Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:38:08.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2020

Edited by
Frank Grady
Frank Grady
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, St Louis
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to The Canterbury Tales , pp. 255 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Benson, C. David, Chaucer’s Drama of Style: Poetic Variety and Contrast in the Canterbury Tales, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. A., “Sir Thopas: An Agony in Three Fits,” Review of English Studies, new series, 22 (1971): 54–58.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher, “Form,” in Strohm, Paul, ed.,Twenty-First Century Approaches: Middle English, Oxford University Press, 2007, 177–90.Google Scholar
Cooper, Helen, Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales, Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline, Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network, Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Nolan, Maura, “Aesthetics,” in Turner, Marion, ed., A Handbook of Middle English Studies, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, 223–38.Google Scholar
Panofsky, Erwin, Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism, New York, Meridian Books, 1957.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Thomas, and Rosenfeld, Jessica, eds., Chaucer and the Subversion of Form, Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Larry, Narrative, Authority and Power, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Strohm, Paul, Social Chaucer, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, Karla, Chaucer Reads the Divine Comedy, Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Travis, Peter, Disseminal Chaucer: Rereading the Nun’s Priest’s Tale, University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Doyle, A. I., and Parkes, M. B., “The Production of Copies of the Canterbury Tales and the Confessio Amantis in the Early Fifteenth Century,” in Parkes, M. B. and Watson, Andrew G., eds., Mediaeval Scribes, Manuscripts and Libraries: Essays Presented to N. R. Ker, Aldershot, Scolar Press, 1978, 163–203.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra, and Wakelin, Daniel, eds., The Production of Books in England, 1350–1500, Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jeremy J., and Pearsall, Derek, eds., Book Production and Publishing in Britain, 1375–1475, Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth, Chaucer and his Readers: Imagining the Author in Late-Medieval England, Princeton University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, John M., and Rickert, Edith, eds., The Text of the Canterbury Tales: Studied on the Basis of All Known Manuscripts, Volume I: Descriptions of the Manuscripts, University of Chicago Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., “Chaucer’s Scribe,” Speculum 81 (2006): 97–138.Google Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., and Stubbs, Estelle, Scribes in the City: London Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375–1425, York Medieval Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Mosser, Daniel W., A Digital Catalogue of the Pre-1500 Manuscripts and Incunables of the Canterbury Tales, 2nd edn, http://mossercatalogue.net.Google Scholar
Owen, Charles A., Jr., The Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales, Chaucer Studies xvii, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 1991.Google Scholar
Partridge, Stephen, “Questions of Evidence: Manuscripts and the Early History of Chaucer’s Works,” in Pinti, Daniel, ed., Writing after Chaucer: Essential Readings in Chaucer and the Fifteenth Century, London, Garland, 1998.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Thomas A., and Kline, Barbara, eds., Rewriting Chaucer: Culture, Authority, and the Idea of the Authentic Text, 1400–1602, Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Stevens, Martin, and Woodward, Daniel, eds., The Ellesmere Manuscript: Essays in Interpretation, San Marino, Huntington Library Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bowden, Muriel, A Commentary on the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales, 2nd edn, New York, Macmillan, 1967.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. V., “The Literary Form of the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales,” Modern Philology 49 (1952): 172–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Helen, “The Frame,” in Correale, Robert M and Hamel, Mary, eds., Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales, vol. i, Cambridge, D. S. Brewer, 2002, 1–18.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. T., “Chaucer the Pilgrim,” PMLA 69 (1954): 928–36.Google Scholar
Leicester, H. Marshall Jr., “Structure as Deconstruction: ‘Chaucer and Estates Satire’ in the General Prologue, or Reading Chaucer as a Prologue to the History of Disenchantment,” Exemplaria 2 (1990): 241–61.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill, Chaucer and Medieval Estates Satire: The Literature of Social Classes and the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales, Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Raymo, Robert R., “The General Prologue,” in Correale, Robert M and Hamel, Mary, eds., Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales, vol. ii, Cambridge, D. S. Brewer, 2005, 1–85.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W., Jr., A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspective, Princeton University Press, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, David, Chaucerian Polity: Absolutist Lineages and Associational Forms in England and Italy, Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Aers, David, Chaucer, Langland, and the Creative Imagination, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
Burger, Glenn, Chaucer’s Queer Nation, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan, Gender and Romance in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Fradenburg, L. O. Aranye, Sacrifice Your Love: Psychoanalysis, Historicism, Chaucer, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hansen, Elaine Tuttle, Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolve, V. A., Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative: The First Five Canterbury Tales, Stanford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Leicester, H. Marshall, The Disenchanted Self: Representing the Subject in the Canterbury Tales, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Jill, Feminizing Chaucer, Cambridge, D. S. Brewer, 1991, 2002.Google Scholar
Middleton, Anne, “War by Other Means: Marriage and Chivalry in Chaucer,” Studies in the Age of Chaucer: Proceedings 1 (1984): 119–33.Google Scholar
Miller, Mark, Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales, Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Muscatine, Charles, Chaucer and the French Tradition, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee, Chaucer and the Subject of History, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W. Jr., A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspective, Princeton University Press, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, Elizabeth, The Knight’s Tale and the Clerk’s Tale, London, Edward Arnold, 1962.Google Scholar
Scala, Elizabeth, Desire in the Canterbury Tales, Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Wallace, David, Chaucerian Polity, Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Blamires, Alcuin, “Philosophical Sleaze? The ‘Strok of Thought’ in the Miller’s Tale and Chaucerian Fabliau,” Modrn Language Review 102 (2007): 621–40.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton, “The Miller’s Tale: An UnBoethian Interpretation,” in Mandel, Jerome and Rosenberg, Bruce, eds.,Medieval Literature and Folklore Studies: Essays in Honor of Francis Lee Utley, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1970, 205–11.Google Scholar
Cannon, Christopher, “The Boethianism of the ‘Miller’s Tale’,” in Chinca, Mark, Reuvekamp-Felber, Timo, and Young, Christopher, eds., Mittelalterliche Novellistik im europaischen Kontext Kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven, Berlin, Erich Schmidt Verlag, 2006, 326–46.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. Talbot, “The Idiom of Popular Poetry in the ‘Miller’s Tale’,” in Donldson, Speaking of Chaucer, New York, Norton, 1970, 13–29.Google Scholar
Howard, Donald, The Idea of the Canterbury Tales, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Kolve, V. A., Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative, Stanford University Press, 1984, 158–216.Google Scholar
Lewis, Robert E., “The English Fabliau Tradition and Chaucer’s ‘Miller’s Tale’,” Modern Philology 79 (1982): 241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lochrie, Karma, “Women’s ‘Pryvetees’ and Fabliau Politics in the Miller’s Tale,” Exemplaria 6 (1994): 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Jill, “Speaking Images in Chaucer’s ‘Miller’s Tale’,” in Yeager, Robert F. and Morse, Charlotte C., eds., Speaking Images: Essays in Honor of V. A. Kolve, Asheville, Pegasus Press, 2001, 237–56.Google Scholar
Miller, Mark, “Naturalism and Its Discontents in the ‘Miller’s Tale’,” ELH 67 (2000): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscatine, Charles, Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study in Style and Meaning, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee, Chaucer and the Subject of History, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Zieman, Katherine, “Chaucer’s Voys,” Representations 60 (1997): 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Elizabeth, “Chaucer Answers Gower: Constance and the Trouble with Reading,” ELH 64 (1997): 627–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, John, “Colonialism, Latinity, Resistance,” in Fein, Susanna and Raybin, David, eds., Chaucer: Contemporary Approaches, University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010, 116–31.Google Scholar
Cooper, Christine F., “‘But algates therby was she understonde’: Translating Custance in Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale,” Yearbook of English Studies 36 (2006): 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn, “Pale Faces: Race, Religion, and Affect in Chaucer’s Texts and Their Readers,” SAC 23 (2001): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinshaw, Carolyn Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Fowler, Elizabeth, “The Empire and the Waif: Consent and Conflict of Laws in the Man of Law’s Tale,” in Aers, David, ed., Medieval Literature and Historical Inquiry, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 2000, 55–67.Google Scholar
Frankis, John, “King Aelle and the Conversion of the English: The Development of a Legend from Bede to Chaucer,” in Scragg, Donald and Weinberg, Carole, eds., Literary Appropriations of the Anglo-Saxons from the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century, Cambridge University Press, 2006, 74–92.Google Scholar
Heng, Geraldine, Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy, New York, Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hsy, Jonathan, Trading Tongues: Merchants, Multilingualism, and Medieval Literature, Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 2013, 65–77.Google Scholar
Ingham, Patricia Clare, “Contrapuntal Histories,” in Ingham, Patricia Clare and Warren, Michelle, eds., Postcolonial Moves: Medieval through Modern, New York, Palgrave, 2003, 47–70.Google Scholar
Johnson, Eleanor, “English Law and the Man of Law’s ‘Prose’ Tale,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 114 (2015): 504–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavezzo, Kathy, “Beyond Rome: Mapping Gender and Justice in the Man of Law’s Tale,” SAC 24 (2002): 149–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legassie, Shayne, “Among Other Possible Things: The Cosmopolitanisms of Chaucer’s ‘Man of Law’s Tale’,” in Ganim, John and Legassie, Shayne, eds., Cosmopolitanism and the Middle Ages, New York, Palgrave, 2013, 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Kathryn, “Storytelling, Exchange, Constancy: East and West in the ‘Man of Law’s Tale,’” ChR 33 (1999): 409–22.Google Scholar
Middleton, Anne, “Chaucer’s ‘New Men’ and the Good of Literature in the Canterbury Tales,” in Said, Edward, ed., Literature and Society: Papers from the English Institute, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980, 15–56.Google Scholar
Nelson, Ingrid, “Premodern Media and Networks of Transmission in the Man of Law’s Tale,” Exemplaria 25 (2013): 211–30.Google Scholar
Schibanoff, Susan, “World’s Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale,” Exemplaria 8 (1996): 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearing, A. C., “Narrative Voice: The Case of Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale,” New Literary History 32 (2001): 715–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blamires, Alcuin, ed., Woman Defamed and Woman Defended: An Anthology of Medieval Texts, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Mary, “The Wife of Bath and the Painting of Lions,” PMLA 94 (1979): 209–22.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan, Gender and Romance in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, Marilynn, Ovid’s Art and the Wife of Bath: The Ethics of Erotic Violence, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fradenburg, L. O., “The Wife of Bath’s Passing Fancy,” SAC 8 (1986): 31–58.Google Scholar
Hanning, Robert, “‘I Shal Find It in a Maner Glose’: Versions of Textual Harassment in Medieval Literature,” in Schictman, Martin and Finke, Laurie, eds., Medieval Texts and Contemporary Readers, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1987, 27–50.Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph, “Compilatio and the Wife of Bath: Latin Backgrounds, Ricardian Texts,” in Minnis, A. J., ed., Latin and Vernacular: Studies in Late-Medieval Texts and Manuscripts, Woodbridge, D. S. Brewer, 1989, 1–11.Google Scholar
Hansen, Elaine Tuttle, Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Patricia Clare, “Pastoral Histories: Utopia, Conquest, and the Wife of Bath’s Tale,” Texas Studies in Language and Literature 44 (2002): 34–46.Google Scholar
Leicester, H. Marshall, “The Art of Impersonation: The General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales,” PMLA 95 (1980): 213–24.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill, Feminizing Chaucer, Woodbridge, D. S. Brewer, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreas, James, “‘Newe Science’ from ‘Olde Bookes’: A Bakhtinian Approach to the Summoner’s Tale,” ChR 25 (1990): 138–51.Google Scholar
Berlin, Gail Ivy, “Speaking to the Devil: A New Context for the Friar’s Tale,” Philological Quarterly 69 (1990): 1–12.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W., “The ‘Friar’s Tale’ as a Liminal Tale,” ChR 17 (1983): 286–91.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary, “Letter and Gloss in the Friar’s and Summoner’s Tales,” Journal of Narrative Technique 2 (1972): 208–14.Google Scholar
Eaton, R. D., “More ‘Groping’ in the Summoner’s Tale,” Neophilologus 88 (2004): 615–21.Google Scholar
Finlayson, John, “Art and Morality in Chaucer’s Friar’s Tale and the Decameron, Day One, Story One,” Neophilologus 89 (2005): 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyler, John M., Language and the Declining World in Chaucer, Dante, and Jean de Meun, Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallacher, Patrick J., “The Summoner’s Tale and Medieval Attitudes towards Sickness,” ChR 21 (1986): 201–12.Google Scholar
Georgianna, Linda, “Lords, Churls, and Friars: The Return to Social Order in The Summoner’s Tale,” in Fein, Susanna Greer, Raybin, David, and Braeger, Peter C., eds., Rebels and Rivals: The Contestive Spirit in the Canterbury Tales, Kalamazoo, Medieval Institute Publications, 1991, 149–72.Google Scholar
Godfrey, Mary F., “Only Words: Cursing and the Authority of Language in Chaucer’s Friar’s Tale,” Exemplaria 10 (1998): 307–28.Google Scholar
Harwood, Britton J., “Chaucer on ‘Speche’: House of Fame, the Friar’s Tale and the Summoner’s Tale,” ChR 26 (1992): 343–49.Google Scholar
Hasenfratz, Robert, “The Science of Flatulence: Possible Sources for the Summoner’s Tale,” ChR 30 (1996): 241–61.Google Scholar
Homar, Katie, “Chaucer’s Novelized, Carnivalized Exemplum: A Bakhtinian Reading of the Friar’s Tale,” ChR 45 (2010): 85–105.Google Scholar
Kolve, V. A. “‘Man in the Middle’: Art and Religion in Chaucer’s Friar’s Tale,” SAC 12 (1990): 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leicester, H. Marshall Jr., “‘No Vileyns Word’: Social Context and Performance in Chaucer’s Friar’s Tale,” ChR 17 (1982): 21–39.Google Scholar
Olson, Glending, “Measuring the Immeasurable: Farting, Geometry, and Theology in the Summoner’s Tale,” ChR 43 (2009): 414–27.Google Scholar
Pulsiano, Phillip, “The Twelve-Spoked Wheel of the Summoner’s Tale,” ChR 29 (1995): 382–89.Google Scholar
Somerset, Fiona, “Here, There, and Everywhere? Wycliffite Conceptions of the Eucharist and Chaucer’s ‘Other’ Lollard Joke,” in Somerset, Fiona, Havens, Jill C, and Pitard, Derrick G., eds., Lollards and Their Influence in Late Medieval England, Woodbridge, Boydell, 2003, 127–38.Google Scholar
Szittya, Penn R. The Antifraternal Tradition in Medieval Literature, Princeton University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szittya, Penn R. “The Friar as False Apostle: Antifraternal Exegesis and the Summoner’s Tale,” Studies in Philology 71 (1974): 19–46.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul B., “Chaucer’s Cosyn to the Dede,” Speculum 57 (1982): 315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Peter W., “Thirteen Ways of Listening to a Fart: Noise in Chaucer’s Summoner’s Tale,” Exemplaria 16 (2004): 323–48.Google Scholar
Weiskott, Eric, “Chaucer the Forester: The Friar’s Tale, Forest History, and Officialdom,” ChR 47 (2013): 323–36.Google Scholar
Blamires, Alcuin, Chaucer, Ethics, and Gender, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullon-Fernandez, Maria, “Poverty, Property, and the Self in the Late Middle Ages: The Case of Chaucer’s Griselda,” Mediaevalia 35 (2014): 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Glenn, Conduct Becoming: Representing Good Wives and Husbands in the Late Middle Ages, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Florschuetz, Angela, “‘A Mooder He Hath, but Fader Hath He Noon’: Constructions of Genealogy in the Clerk’s Tale and the Man of Law’s Tale,” ChR 44 (2009): 25–60.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Amy W., “The Griselda Game,” ChR 39 (2004): 41–69Google Scholar
Green, Richard F., “Griselda in Siena,” SAC 33 (2011): 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Hawkins. “The Victim’s Side: Chaucer’s Clerk’s Tale and Webster’s Duchess of Malfi,” Signs 1 (1975): 339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavezzo, Kathy, “Chaucer and Everyday Death: The Clerk’s Tale, Burial, and the Subject of Poverty,” SAC 23 (2001): 255–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Kathryn L., “Despoiling Griselda: Chaucer’s Walter and the Problem of Knowledge in The Clerk’s Tale,” SAC 10 (1988): 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Anne, “The Clerk and His Tale: Some Literary Contexts,” SAC 2 (1980): 121–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Mark, Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales, Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Allan J., Ethics and Exemplary Narrative in Chaucer and Gower, Cambridge, UK, Boydell and Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
Morse, Charlotte C., “Critical Approaches to the Clerk’s Tale,” in David Benson, C and Robertson, Elizabeth, eds., Chaucer’s Religious Tales, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 1990, 71–83.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee, Temporal Circumstances: Form and History in the Canterbury Tales, New York, Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raby, Michael, “The Clerk’s Tale and the Force of Habit,” ChR 47 (2013): 223–46.Google Scholar
Schwebel, Leah, “Redressing Griselda: Restoration through Translation in the Clerk’s Tale,” ChR 47 (2013): 274–99.Google Scholar
Seal, Samantha, Father Chaucer: Generating Authority in the Canterbury Tales, Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutters, Lynn, “Griselda’s Pagan Virtue,” ChR 44 (2009): 61–83.Google Scholar
Sidhu, Nicole Nolan, “Weeping for the Virtuous Wife: Laymen, Affective Piety and Chaucer’s ‘Clerk’s Tale,’” in Kowaleski, Maryanne and Goldberg, P. J. P, eds., Medieval Domesticity: Home, Housing and Household in Medieval England, Cambridge University Press, 2008, 177–208.Google Scholar
Stanbury, Sarah, “Regimes of the Visual in Premodern England: Gaze, Body, and Chaucer’s ‘Clerk’s Tale’,” New Literary History 28 (1997): 261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, David, Chaucerian Polity: Absolutist Lineages and Associational Forms in England and Italy, Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Williams, Tara, Inventing Womanhood: Gender and Language in Later Middle English Writing, Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bachman, W. Bryant, Jr., “To Maken Illusion: The Philosophy of Magic and the Magic of Philosophy in The Franklin’s Tale,” ChR 12 (1977): 55–67.Google Scholar
Battles, Dominique, “Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale and Boccaccio’s Filocolo Reconsidered,” ChR 34 (1999): 38–59.Google Scholar
Battles, Paul, “Magic and Metafiction in the Franklin’s Tale: Chaucer’s Clerk of Orleans as Double of the Franklin,” in Jones, Timothy S and Sprunger, David A, eds., Marvels, Monsters, and Miracles: Studies in the Medieval and Early Modern Imaginations, Kalamazoo, Medieval Institute Publications, 2002.Google Scholar
Bleeth, Kenneth, Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale, Franklin’s Tale, and Physician’s Tale: An Annotated Bibliography, 1900–2005, University of Toronto Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Braswell, Mary Flowers, “The Magic of Machinery: A Context for Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale,” Mosaic 18 (1985): 101–10.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Michael, “Dorigen and Boccaccio’s Female Voices,” SAC 29 (2007): 259–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaganti, Seeta, “Terpsichorean Form: Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale and Robert Smithson’s Spiral Jetty,” in Meyer-Lee, Robert J. and Sanok, Catherine, The Medieval Literary: Beyond Form, Cambridge, UK, Boydell and Brewer, 2018, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnes, Linda, “‘This Werk Unresonable’: Narrative Frustration and Generic Redistribution in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale,” ChR 23 (1989): 300–15.Google Scholar
Coss, Peter, “The Franklin,” in Rigby, Stephen H., ed., Historians on Chaucer: The “General Prologue” to the Canterbury Tales, Oxford University Press, 2014, 227–46.Google Scholar
Crane, Susan, “The Franklin as Dorigen,” ChR 24 (1990): 236–52.Google Scholar
Gaylord, Alan T., “The Promises in The Franklin’s Tale,” ELH 31 (1964): 331–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Cathy, “The Name of Soveragnetee: The Private and Public Faces of Marriage in The Franklin’s Tale,” Studies in Philology 105 (2008): 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittredge, George Lyman, “Chaucer’s Discussion of Marriage,” Modern Philology 9 (1911–12): 435–67.Google Scholar
Kolve, V. A., Telling Images: Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative II, Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Lipton, Emma, “Beyond Kittredge: Teaching Marriage in The Canterbury Tales,” in Travis, Peter W. and Grady, Frank, eds., Approaches to Teaching Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales,” 2nd edn, New York, Modern Language Association, 2014, 88–93.Google Scholar
McEntire, Sandra J., “Illusion and Interpretation in the Franklin’s Tale,” ChR 31 (1996): 145–63.Google Scholar
Smith, Warren S., “Dorigen’s Lament and the Resolution of the Franklin’s Tale,” ChR 36 (2002): 374–90.Google Scholar
Astell, Ann, “The Translatio of Chaucer’s Pardoner,” Exemplaria 4 (1992): 411–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boenig, Robert, “Musical Irony in the Pardoner’s Tale,” ChR 24 (1990): 253–58.Google Scholar
Braswell, Mary Flowers, “Chaucer’s Palimpsest: Judas Iscariot and the Pardoner’s Tale,” ChR 29 (1995): 303–10.Google Scholar
Copeland, Rita, “The Pardoner’s Body and the Disciplining of Rhetoric,” in Kay, Sarah and Rubin, Miri, eds., Framing Medieval Bodies, Manchester University Press, 1994, 138–59.Google Scholar
Cox, Catherine, “Water of Bitterness: The Pardoner and/as the Sotah,” Exemplaria 16 (2004): 131–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Richard Firth, “The Pardoner’s Pants (and Why They Matter),” SAC 15 (1993): 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerner, Fred, “Church Office, Routine, and Self-Exile in Chaucer’s Pardoner,” SAC 16 (1994): 69–98.Google Scholar
Lampert-Weissig, Lisa, “Chaucer’s Pardoner and the Jews,” Exemplaria 28 (2016): 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malo, Robin, “The Pardoner’s Relics (and Why They Matter the Most),” ChR 43 (2008): 82–102.Google Scholar
Maxfield, David K., “St. Mary Rouncivale, Charing Cross: The Hospital of Chaucer’s Pardoner,” ChR 28 (1993): 148–63.Google Scholar
Minnis, Alistair, “Reclaiming the Pardoners,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 33 (2003): 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Marijane, “Transgressive Word and Image in Chaucer’s Enshrined Coillons Passage,” ChR 37 (2003): 365–84.Google Scholar
Pugh, Tison, Chaucer’s (Anti-)Eroticisms and the Queer Middle Ages, Columbus,Ohio State University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rollo, David, Kiss my Relics: Hermaphroditic Fictions of the Middle Ages, University of Chicago Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. Vance, “Death and Texts: Finitude before Form,” Minnesota Review 80 (2013): 131–44.Google Scholar
Bale, Anthony, The Jew in the Medieval Book: English Antisemitisms, 1350–1500, Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bale, Anthony Feeling Persecuted: Christians, Jews and Images of Violence in the Middle Ages, London, Reaktion Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Benson, C. David, and Robertson, Elizabeth, eds., Chaucer’s Religious Tales, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 1990.Google Scholar
Biddick, Kathleen, The Typological Imaginary: Circumcision, Technology, History, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blurton, Heather, and Johnson, Hannah, The Critics and the Prioress: Antisemitism, Criticism, and Chaucer’s Prioress’s Tale, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeremy, Living Letters of the Law: Ideas of the Jew in Medieval Christianity, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Delany, Sheila, ed., Chaucer and the Jews: Sources, Contexts, Meanings, New York, Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Johnson, Hannah, Blood Libel: Scholarship and Ethics at the Limits of Jewish History, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kruger, Steven F. The Spectral Jew: Conversion and Embodiment in Medieval Europe, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Krummel, Miriamne Ara, Crafting Jewishness in Medieval England: Legally Absent, Virtually Present, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampert[-Weissig], Lisa, Gender and Jewish Difference from Paul to Shakespeare, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Langmuir, Gavin, Toward a Definition of Antisemitism, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lavezzo, Kathy, The Accommodated Jew: English Antisemitism from Bede to Milton, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lipton, Sara, Dark Mirror: The Medieval Origins of Anti-Semitic Iconography, New York, Metropolitan Books, 2014.Google Scholar
Mundill, Robin, England’s Jewish Solution: Experiment and Expulsion, 1262–1290, Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nirenberg, David, Neighboring Faiths: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism in the Middle Ages and Today, University of Chicago Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisse, Ruth, Jacob’s Shipwreck: Diaspora, Translation, and Jewish–Christian Relations in Medieval England, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Rubin, Miri, Gentile Tales: The Narrative Assault on Late Medieval Jews, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W., “The Wisdom of The Nun’s Priest’s Tale,” in Edward Vasta and Zacharias P. Thundy, eds., Chaucerian Problems and Perspectives: Essays Presented to Paul E. Beichner CSC., University of Notre Dame Press, 70–82.Google Scholar
Brewer, Derek, Chaucer: The Poet as Storyteller, London, Macmillan, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, E. T., “Patristic Exegesis in the Criticism of Medieval Literature: The Opposition,” in Donaldson, , Speaking of Chaucer, New York, W. W. Norton, 1970, 134–53.Google Scholar
Lenaghan, R. T., “The Nun’s Priest’s Fable,” PMLA 78 (1963): 300–07.Google Scholar
McAlpine, Monica, “The Triumph of Fiction in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale,” in Edward, Robert R., ed., Art and Context in Late Medieval English Narrative: Essays in Honour of Robert Worth Frank, Jr., Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 79–92.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill, From Aesop to Reynard: Beast Literature in Medieval Britain, Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscatine, Charles, Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study in Style and Meaning, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Payne, F. Anne, Chaucer and Menippean Satire, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Derek, “Chaucer, the Nun’s Priest’s Tale and the Modern Reader,” Dutch Quarterly Review 10 (1980): 164–74.Google Scholar
Thomas, Paul R., “‘Have ye no mannes herte?’: Chauntecleer as Cock-Man in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale,” in Beidler, Peter G, ed., Masculinities in Chaucer: Approaches to Maleness in the Canterbury Tales and Troilus and Criseyde, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 1998, 197–202.Google Scholar
Travis, Peter, Disseminal Chaucer: Rereading the Nun’s Priest’s Tale, University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Edward, “Commentary Displacing Text: The Nun’s Priest’s Tale and the Scholastic Fable Tradition,” SAC 18 (1996): 119–41.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Edward“The Nun’s Priest’s Tale,” in Correale, Robert M. and Hamel, Mary, eds., Sources and Analogues of the Canterbury Tales, vol. i, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 2002, 449–52.Google Scholar
Benson, C. David, and Robertson, Elizabeth, eds., Chaucer’s Religious Tales, Chaucer Studies 15, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 1990.Google Scholar
Blamires, Alcuin, Chaucer, Ethics and Gender, Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Alfred, The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer’s Poetry, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Fradenburg, L. O. Aranye, Sacrifice Your Love: Psychoanalysis, Historicism, Chaucer, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mann, Jill, “Chaucer and Atheism,” SAC 17 (1995): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Anne, “The Physician’s Tale and Love’s Martyrs: ‘Ensamples Mo than Ten’ as a Method in the Canterbury Tales,” ChR 8 (1973): 9–32.Google Scholar
Miller, Mark, Philosophical Chaucer: Love, Sex and Agency in the “Canterbury Tales,” Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. Allen, Ethics and Exemplary Narrative in Chaucer and Gower, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 2004.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee, “The ‘Parson’s Tale’ and the Quitting of the ‘Canterbury Tales’,” Traditio 34 (1978): 331–80.Google Scholar
Phillips, Helen, ed., Chaucer and Religion, Christianity and Culture: Issues in Teaching/Research 4, Cambridge, UK, D. S. Brewer, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. W. Jr., A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspective, Princeton University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Larry, Narrative, Authority, and Power: The Medieval Exemplum and the Chaucerian Tradition, Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Travis, Peter, “Deconstructing Chaucer’s Retraction,” Exemplaria 3 (1991): 133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Nicholas, “Chaucer’s Public Christianity,” Religion and Literature 37:2 (Summer 2005): 99–114.Google Scholar
Grudin, Michaela P., “Discourse and the Problem of Closure in the Canterbury Tales,” PMLA 107 (1992): 1157–67.Google Scholar
Howard, Donald R., The Idea of the Canterbury Tales, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank, The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction, rev. edn, Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
McGerr, Rosemarie P., Chaucer’s Open Books: Resistance to Closure in Medieval Discourse, Gainesville, University Press of Florida, 1998.Google Scholar
Patterson, Lee, “The ‘Parson’s Tale’ and the Quitting of the ‘Canterbury Tales’,” Traditio 34 (1978): 331–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Deirdre, “Retraction and Re-Collection: Chaucer’s Apocalyptic Self-Examination,” Mediaevalia 36–37 (2015–16): 263–90.Google Scholar
Travis, Peter, “Deconstructing Chaucer’s Retraction,” Exemplaria 3 (1991): 133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Further Reading
  • Edited by Frank Grady, University of Missouri, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to The Canterbury Tales
  • Online publication: 21 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848463.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Further Reading
  • Edited by Frank Grady, University of Missouri, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to The Canterbury Tales
  • Online publication: 21 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848463.023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Further Reading
  • Edited by Frank Grady, University of Missouri, St Louis
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to The Canterbury Tales
  • Online publication: 21 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848463.023
Available formats
×