Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART 1 ADAPTATION AND ITS CONTEXTS
- PART 2 GENRES AND PLAYS
- PART 3 DIRECTORS
- PART 4 CRITICAL ISSUES
- 14 Looking at Shakespeare's women on film
- 15 National and racial stereotypes in Shakespeare films
- 16 Shakespeare the illusionist
- 17 Shakespeare's cinematic offshoots
- Further reading
- Filmography
- Index
15 - National and racial stereotypes in Shakespeare films
from PART 4 - CRITICAL ISSUES
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2006
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- PART 1 ADAPTATION AND ITS CONTEXTS
- PART 2 GENRES AND PLAYS
- PART 3 DIRECTORS
- PART 4 CRITICAL ISSUES
- 14 Looking at Shakespeare's women on film
- 15 National and racial stereotypes in Shakespeare films
- 16 Shakespeare the illusionist
- 17 Shakespeare's cinematic offshoots
- Further reading
- Filmography
- Index
Summary
We all object to stereotypes. They are oversimplified preconceptions, involving those who trade in them in lazy thinking and prejudice. They don't derive from direct experience. They are subject to fashion. And they tend to come into conflict with one another. But however objectionable they may be, on intellectual or moral grounds, we can't avoid them in our own, as well as other people's, thinking.
When, in Kenneth Branagh’s film of Hamlet (1996), the Gravedigger (Billy Crystal) remarks that in England the men are as mad as Hamlet, we laugh. Not exactly uproariously, but in the way, no doubt, that the line has raised a laugh for four hundred years. We laugh at the complexity of the dramatic irony in the situation – the Gravedigger’s subject is his Prince, he is his Prince’s subject, and yet here he is literally addressing his Prince on the subject. However, we also laugh at the English playwright giving the Danish character a stereotypical characterisation of the English. And if we’re English we laugh, slightly awkwardly, at the joke at our expense (not sure whether or not we recognise ourselves in it, not sure whether we’re particularly proud of our great English playwright’s laboured handling of it).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film , pp. 261 - 273Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000