Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:23:27.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - ‘What is the language using us for?’

Modern Scottish Poetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Gerard Carruthers
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Liam McIlvanney
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

Malcolm Mooney’s question, posed at the beginning of W. S. Graham’s late collection of verse, Implements in Their Places, articulates a concern shared by many modern Scottish poets. All poets are sensitive to the complexities of their medium, but in Scotland language itself has been ‘a question’ for centuries. As the great poets of the 1920s and 30s locked horns over the proper use of Scots, English or Gaelic, issues of patriotic loyalty became inextricably bound up with linguistic choices. While many applauded Hugh MacDiarmid’s resistance to what was often seen as the creeping, unavoidable incorporation of the Scottish languages into English, others debated Edwin Muir’s view that Scots had survived largely as a medium for unsophisticated kinds of writing and had little future as a serious literary language. The notion that a poet’s language was to be judged in terms of his national commitment, however, meant that the need to revive Scots and Gaelic was felt deeply – and widely. Graham’s query, presented as both a title and a refrain half a century later, is in part reflective of a sense shared with numerous writers of his generation that their art was somehow determined by their choice of language. It also anticipates, however, the response of many younger poets to the language question, which has been chary of absolute choices and tending instead towards more exploratory, interrogative, ironic or wittily tangential approaches. It is not that the question has been forgotten, but rather that the modes of address have been transformed for a newly devolved, twenty-first-century Scotland.

When Maurice Lindsay introduced his anthology of Modern Scottish Poetry in 1965, he emphasised the ‘variety of experience’ and ‘integrity of expression’ that distinguished the poems he had gathered, arguing that ‘these qualities, and not the question of which of Scotland’s three languages her writers choose to use, are what constitute the real Scottish Renaissance’. His very comment, however, reveals that in the 1960s it would generally seem strange to consider modern Scottish poetry without discussing the language question. Almost thirty years later, when Douglas Dunn turned his attention to editing another Faber collection, Twentieth-Century Scottish Poetry, he still found it necessary to address the implications of the linguistic choices represented in his anthology, observing somewhat drily that ‘Scottish poetry has been steeped in politics ever since MacDiarmid’s instigatory drum-beating back in the early 1920s.’

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Graham, W. S., ‘What is the language using us for?’, in New Collected Poems, ed. M. Francis (London: Faber, 2004)Google Scholar
Lindsay, Maurice (ed.), Modern Scottish Poetry: An Anthology of the Scottish Renaissance (London: Faber, 1966)
Crawford, Robert, ‘Simultaneous Translation’, in Talkies (London: Chatto & Windus, 1992)Google Scholar
Smith, Iain Crichton, ‘The Village’, in Collected Poems (Manchester: Carcanet, 1992)Google Scholar
Graham, ‘What is the language using us for?’, p. 199. The poem revives the eponymous persona of Graham’s Malcolm Mooney’s Land (1970)
The Nightfisherman: Selected Letters of W. S. Graham (Manchester: Carcanet, 1999), pp. 267–8
Morgan, Edwin, Collected Poems (Manchester: Carcanet, 1990), p. 134Google Scholar
Morgan, Edwin, Collected Translations (Manchester: Carcanet, 1996)Google Scholar
Lochhead, Liz, ‘Five Berlin Poems’, in Bagpipe Muzak (London: Penguin, 1991), pp. 77–84Google Scholar
Lochhead, Liz, ‘Tam Lin’s Lady’ from The Grimm Sisters (1981), in Dreaming Frankenstein and Collected Poems 1967–1984 (Edinburgh: Polygon, 1984), p. 93Google Scholar
Lochhead, Liz, ‘Box Room’ from Memo for Spring (1972), in Dreaming Frankenstein, p. 176
Jamie, Kathleen, ‘The Queen of Sheba’ (1994), in Mr and Mrs Scotland are Dead: Poems 1980–1994 (Tarset: Bloodaxe, 2002), p. 111Google Scholar
Jamie, Kathleen, ‘The Wishing Tree’ and ‘The Tree House’, in The Tree House (London: Picador, 2004), pp. 3, 41Google Scholar
Duffy, Carol Ann, ‘Alliance’, in Standing Female Nude (London: Anvil, 1985), p. 26Google Scholar
Duffy, Carol Ann, ‘Originally’, in The Other Country (London: Anvil, 1990), p. 7Google Scholar
Duffy, Carol Ann, ‘Away and See’, in Mean Time (London: Anvil, 1993), p. 23Google Scholar
Thomas, Jane E., ‘“The Intolerable wrestle with words”: The Poetry of Carol Ann Duffy’, Bête Noire, 6 (Winter 1988), 78–88Google Scholar
Woods, Michael, ‘“What it is like in words”: Translation, Reflection and Refraction in the Poetry of Carol Ann Duffy’, in Angelica Michaelis and Antony Rowland (eds.), The Poetry of Carol Ann Duffy (Manchester University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Bête Noire, 6 (Winter 1988), 75–6, cited by Smith, ‘What like is it?’, p. 143
Imlah, Mick, The Lost Leader (London: Faber, 2008)Google Scholar
Muir, Edwin, Scottish Journey, ed. T. C. Smout (1935; Edinburgh: Mainstream, 1979), p. 94Google Scholar
Brown, Ian and Riach, Alan (eds.), The Edinburgh Companion to Twentieth-Century Scottish Literature (Edinburgh University Press, 2009)
Crawford, Robert, Identifying Poets (Edinburgh University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Crawford, Robert and Imlah, Mick (eds.), The New Penguin Book of Scottish Verse (London: Penguin, 2000)
Crawford, Robert and Whyte, Hamish (eds.), About Edwin Morgan (Edinburgh University Press, 1990)
Dunn, Douglas (ed.), Twentieth-Century Scottish Poetry (London: Faber, 1992)
McGuire, Matt and Nicholson, Colin (eds.), The Edinburgh Companion to Contemporary Scottish Poetry (Edinburgh University Press, 2009)
Whyte, Christopher, Modern Scottish Poetry (Edinburgh University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×