Alberti, Valentin. Compendium juris naturae, orthodoxae theologiae conformatum. Leipzig, 1676.Google Scholar

Alberti, Valentin. Eros Lipsicus. Leipzig, 1687.Google Scholar

Althusius, Johannes. Politica methodice digesta [1605], 3rd ed. n.p., 1614.Google Scholar

Amyraldus (Amyraut), Moses. Brief traité de la predestination. Saumur, 1634.Google Scholar

Arnisaeus, Henning. De republica; seu relectionis politicae libri duo. Frankfurt am Main, 1615.Google Scholar

Barbeyrac, Jean. ‘An historical and critical account of the science of morality’, preface to Pufendorf, Of the Law of Nature and Nations. Eight Books (see above).Google Scholar

Barbeyrac, Jean. Jugement d’un Anonyme [Leibniz] sur l’original de cet abrégé avec des reflexions du traducteur, in appendix to Samuel Pufendorf, Les devoirs de l’homme et du citoyen, trans. J. Barbeyrac. Amsterdam, 1718. English translation: ‘The judgment of an anonymous writer on the original of this abridgment’, in Pufendorf, The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, trans. Andrew Tooke (1691), ed. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David, [with] Two Discourses and a Commentary by Jean Barbeyrac, trans. David Saunders. Indianapolis, IN, 2003, 267–305.Google Scholar

Becman, Johann Christoph. Meditationes politicae XXIV [1672]. Frankfurt a. d. Oder, 1674.Google Scholar

[Beck, Christian August]. Recht und Verfassung des Reiches in der Zeit Maria Theresias. Die Vorträge zum Unterricht des Erzherzogs Joseph im Natur- und Völkerrecht sowie im Deutschen Staats- und Lehnrecht, ed. Conrad, Hermann et al. Cologne and Opladen, 1964.Google Scholar

[Beckmann, Nikolaus, and Schwartz, Josua]. Index quarandum novitatum quas Dominus Samuel Puffendorff libro suo De jure naturae et gentium, contra orthodoxa fundamenta Londini edidit. Lund, 1673.Google Scholar

Besold, Christoph. Dissertatio politico-juridica de politica maiestate. Tübingen, 1625.Google Scholar

Bibliotheca Barbeyraciana, sive catalogus exquisitissimæ supellectilis librariæ, qua usus est vir præclarus, atque omni doctrina perpolitus J. Barbeyracius Jctus … Groningen, 1744.Google Scholar

Boecler, Johann Heinrich. In Hugonis Grotii Jus belli et pacis, ad Illustrissimum Baronem Boineburgium commentatio. Straßburg, 1663.Google Scholar

Boecler, Johann Heinrich. In Hugonis Grotii Juris belli et pacis Lib. II cap. priora VII. Ad Illustrissimum Baronem Boineburgium commentatio. Straßburg, 1664.Google Scholar

Boecler, Johann Heinrich. Historia belli Danici, Annis MDCXLIII, MDCXLIV, MDCXLV gesti. Stockholm, 1676 (reprinted Strasburg 1679 as Historia belli Sveco-Danici).Google Scholar

Budde(us), Johann Franz. Historia juris naturalis aucta et ad hanc aetatem usque continuata. Halle, 1717.Google Scholar

Budde(us), Johann Franz. Institutiones Theologiae dogmaticae [1723], in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 7.1, ed. Friedrike, Nüssel. Hildesheim and New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Budde(us), Johann Franz. Isagoge historico-theologica ad theologiam universam singulasque eius partes [1727, ²1730] in Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 8, ed. Hell, Leonhard. Hildesheim, New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Calixt, Georg. Epitomes theologiae moralis […]. Helmstedt, 1634, ²1662.Google Scholar

Calixt, Georg. De tolerantia Reformatorum circa quaestiones inter ipsos et Augustanam Confessionem professos controversas consultatio. Helmstedt, 1658.Google Scholar

Calixt, Georg. Werke in Auswahl, ed. Mager, Inge. 5 vols. Göttingen 1970–82.Google Scholar

Carmichael, Gershom. Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Scottish Enlightenment. The Writings of Gershom Carmichael, ed. and trans. Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael. Indianapolis, IN, 2002.Google Scholar

Chemnitz, Bogislaw Philipp von. Königlichen Schwedischen in Teutschland geführten Krieg erster Theil. Stettin, 1648.Google Scholar

Chemnitz, Bogislaw Philipp von. Königlichen Schwedischen in Teutschland geführten Krieg zweiter Theil. Stockholm, 1653.Google Scholar

Cocceji, Samuel / Cocceji, Heinrich, Disputatio juridica inauguralis de principio juris naturalis unico, vero, et adaequato. Frankfurt a. d. Oder [1699], 1712.Google Scholar

[Cocceji, Samuel]. The Frederician Code; Or, A Body of Law for the Dominions of the King of Prussia. Founded on Reason, and the Constitutions of the Country, trans. anon, 2 vols. Edinburgh, 1761.Google Scholar

Cocceji, Samuel. Justitiae naturalis, et Romanae novum systema in quo praemisso principio generali omnia justitiae naturalis praecepta complectente, demonstrantur [1740], in Samuel Cocceji, Introductio Ad Henrici L. B. De Cocceii Grotium illustratum; Continens dissertationes prooemiales XII. Halle, 1748, 227–510.Google Scholar

Coccejus, Johannes. Summa doctrinae de foedere et testamento Dei. Leiden, 1654. Frankfurt am Main, ²1689.Google Scholar

Conring, Hermann. De pace perpetua Protestantibus danda consultatio catholica [anon. 1648]. Helmstedt, 1657.Google Scholar

Dürr, Johann Conrad. Enchiridion theologiae moralis, in quo virtutes et officia hominis Christiani tum in genere tum in certis vitae statibus considerati explicantur. Nuremberg, 1662.Google Scholar

Erasmus, Desiderius. De sarcenda ecclesiae concordia deque sedandis opinionibus dissidiis. Basel, 1534.Google Scholar

Forcellini, Aegidio. Lexicon totius Latinitatis [1688–1768], ed. Furlanetto, Joseph and updated by Corradini, Francisco and Perin, Joseph, 5 vols. Padua, 1940. Online at www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/25_90_1688-1768-_Forcellini_Aeg.html (accessed 4 May 2022).Google Scholar

Frederick the Great. Mémoires pour servis à l’histoire de maison de Brandenbourg. Berlin, 1751.Google Scholar

Gerhard, Johann. Centuria quaestionum politicarum, Coronis: An diversae religiones in bene constituta Respublica tolerandae? Jena, 1608.Google Scholar

Glafey, Adam Friedrich. Vollständige Geschichte des Rechts der Vernunft … nebst einer Bibliotheca Juris Naturae et Gentium [1739]. Aalen, 1962.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace [1625], ed. Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis, IN, 2005.Google Scholar

Gundling, Nicolaus Hieronymus. ‘Preliminär-Discours’, in Erläuterung über Samuelis Pufendorfii zwey Bücher De officio hominis & civis secundum legem naturalem, aus dessen Academischen Discoursen …, ed. Ayrmann, Christoph Friedrich. Hamburg, 1744.Google Scholar

Heineccius, Johann Gottlieb. A Methodical System of Universal Law: Or, The Laws of Nature and Nations, trans. George Turnbull [1741]. Indianapolis, IN, 2008.Google Scholar

Heineccius, Johann Gottlieb. Praelectiones academicae in Hugonis Grotii De Ivre Belli Et Pacis Libros III. Berlin, 1744.Google Scholar

Hertius, Joannis Nicolai. ‘Benevolo Lectori’, in Samuel Pufendorf, De jure naturae et gentium libri octo, cum annotatis Joannis Nicolai Hertii, editio nova. Frankfurt am Main, 1706.Google Scholar

Heumann, Christoph August. Acta philosophorum, das ist gründliche Nachrichten aus dem Historia philosophica. Halle, 1715–26.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, 3 vols., ed. Malcolm, Noel. Oxford, 2012.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard, trans. Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Holberg, Ludvig. Introduktion til naturens og folkerettens kundskab. Uddraget af de fornemste juristers, besynderlig Grotii, Pufendorfs og Thomasii skrifter … [1716], introd. Haakonssen, Knud. Copenhagen, 2018.Google Scholar

Horn, Johann Friedrich. Politicorum pars architectonica de civitate. Utrecht, 1664.Google Scholar

Hufeland, Gottlieb. Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts. Leipzig, 1785.Google Scholar

Hülsemann, Johannes. Calvinismus irreconciliabilis. Seu delineatio caussarum, earumque applicatio ad Calvinismum propter quas Josephus Hallus, Exoniensis Episcopus Papismum censuit esse irreconciliabilem. Wittenberg, 1641, ³1667.Google Scholar

Hülsemann, Johannes. Extensio breviarii theologici, exhibentis praecipuas et recentiores Christianae fidei controversias. Leipzig, 1648, Heilbronn, ⁵1667.Google Scholar

Hunnius, Nikolaus. [Diaskepsis] theologica de fundamentali dissensu doctrinae Evangelicae-Lutheranae, et Calvinianae. Wittenberg, 1626, ²1663.Google Scholar

Hunnius, Nikolaus. Epitome credendorum, oder Kurtzer Inhalt dessen, was ein Christ von göttlichen und geistlichen Dingen zu wissen und zu gleuben bedürftig. Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig, 1625.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises [1725], ed. Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis, IN, ²2008.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy [1755], ed. Haakonssen, Knud and Maurer, Christian. Indianapolis, IN, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Index librorum prohibitorum 1600–1966 (Index de livres interdits, vol. XI), ed. de Bujanda, J. M.. Montréal, 2002.Google Scholar

Jablonski, Daniel Ernst. Kurtze Vorstellung der Einigkeit und des Unterscheids im Glauben beyder Evangelischen so genandten Lutherischen und Reformirten Kirchen. Berlin, 1697.Google Scholar

Jablonski, Daniel Ernst. De decreto absoluto. [Berlin], 1698.Google Scholar

Jurieu, Pierre. De pace inter Protestantes ineunda consultatio. Utrecht, 1688.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. ‘Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim’ [1784], in Anthropology, History, and Education, in the Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, ed. and trans. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge, 2007, 107–20.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. ‘Towards perpetual peace’ [1795], in Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge, 1996, 311–52.Google Scholar

Kirchner, Hermann. Respublica ad disputationis aciem methodice revocata (1608). Marburg, ²1614.Google Scholar

Klinger, Gottfried, see Rolleti, Johannis.Google Scholar

König, Johann Friedrich. Theologia positiva acroamatica, synoptice tractata […]. [1664; ¹⁴1719], ed. Stegmann, Andreas. Tübingen, 2006.Google Scholar

Lange, Joachim. Lebenslauf […] von ihm selbst verfaßet. Halle and Leipzig, 1744.Google Scholar

Lauremberg, Johannes. Graecia antiqua, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel. Amsterdam, 1660.Google Scholar

Le Clerc, Jean. Review of Pufendorf, Jus feciale divinum, in: Bibliothèque Choisie (1705): 391–401.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Epistola ad Amicum super exercitationes posthumas Samuelis Pufendorfii De consensu et dissensu Protestantium’, in Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, IV.6. Berlin, 2008, 326–35.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Essais de théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l’homme et l’origine du mal. Amsterdam, 1710.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Meditation on the common concept of justice’ [c. 1702–3], in The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Patrick Riley (Cambridge, 1972), 45–64.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Monita quaedam ad principia Pufendorfiani operis De officio hominis et civis’, in Opera omnia, 6 vols., ed. Dutens, Ludovici. Geneva, 1768, vol. IV.3, 275–83.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Neue Methode Jurisprudenz zu lernen und zu lehren’ [1667], in Frühe Schriften zum Naturrecht, ed. and trans. Busche, Hubertus. Hamburg, 2003.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Opinion on the principles of Pufendorf’ [1706], in The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Patrick Riley (Cambridge, 1972), 65–75.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Riley, Patrick. Cambridge, ² 1988.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, (Akademie Ausgabe), I.4. Berlin, Leipzig, 1990.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. ‘Sur Thomasius, Utrum hæresis sit crimen’ [c. 1698], in G. W. Leibniz: Textes Inédits, 2 vols., ed. Grua, Gaston. Paris, 1948, 210–12.Google Scholar

Lessing, Theophil. Disputatio de religionum tolerantia [1669], Lat./Ger., ed. Gawlick, Günter. Göttingen, 1991.Google Scholar

Loccenius, Johannes. Historiæ rerum Svecicarum, A primo rege Sveciæ usque ad Caroli Gustavi Regis Sveciæ obitum deductæ, libri novem. Uppsala, 1662.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government [1690], ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, 1988, ² 2000.Google Scholar

Ludovici, Jacob Friedrich. Delineatio historiae juris divini naturalis et positivi universalis. Halle, 1701.Google Scholar

Mascovius, Gottfridus. ‘Lectori Benevolo’, in Samuel Pufendorf, De jure naturae et gentium libri octo …, ed. Gottfridus Mascovius, 2 vols. Frankfurt & Leipzig, 1744, vol. I, i–xx.Google Scholar

Meijer, Ludwig. Philosophia S. Scripturae interpres. 1666.Google Scholar

Meisner, Balthasar. [Anthropologias] sacrae, in qua status naturae humanae, et eo spectantes articuli exponuntur, Decas prima [secunda, tertia]. Wittenberg, 1619, ³1663.Google Scholar

Meisner, Balthasar. Dissertatio de legibus, in quattuor libellos distributa. Wittenberg, 1616.Google Scholar

Meisner, Balthasar. Philosophia sobria, hoc est pia consideratio quaestionum philosophicarum in controversiis theologicis, quas Calviniani moverunt Orthodoxis, subinde occurentium. Pars prima. Wittenberg 1611, ⁷1655; Secunda pars […] in controversiis Papisticis […]. Wittenberg 1613, ¹⁰1655; Tertia pars […]. Wittenberg, 1623, ⁴1655.Google Scholar

Meursius, Johannes. Ceramicus geminus, sive de ceramici Atheniensium utriusque antiquitatibus, liber singularis, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel. Utrecht, 1663.Google Scholar

Meursius, Johannes. Miscellanea Laconica, sive variarum antiquitatum Laconicarum libri IV, ed. Pufendorf, Samuel. Amsterdam, 1661.Google Scholar

Molanus, Gerhard Wolter and Hermann Barckhausen. Methodus reducendae unionis ecclesiasticae inter Romanenses et Protestantes [1682], in Commercium litterarium clarorum virorum. Braunschweig, 1737–8, vol. 2, 327–42.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, , de Secondat, Charles-Louis, la Brède, Baron de et de, Meine Reisen in Deutschland 1728–1729, ed. and intr. Jürgen Overhoff, trans. Hans W. Schumacher, postscript by Vanessa de Senarclens. Stuttgart, 2014.Google Scholar

Musaeus, Johannes. Introductio in theologiam, qua de natura theologiae naturalis, et revelatae, itemque de theologiae revelatae principio cognoscendi primo, Scriptura Sacra, agitatur. Jena, 1679.Google Scholar

Neumann, J. F. W. Bibliotheca iuris Imperantium quadripartita. Nuremberg, 1727.Google Scholar

Pareus, David. Irenicum sive de unione et synodo Evangelicorum concilianda liber votivus, paci Ecclesiae et desideriis pacificorum dicatus. Heidelberg, 1614.Google Scholar

Pictet, Benedict. De consensu ac dissensu inter Reformatos, et Augustanae confessionis fratres, dissertatio. Amsterdam, 1697.Google Scholar

Rachel, Samuel. De jure naturae et gentium dissertationes [1676], ed. Bar, Carl Ludwig, trans. Bate, John Pawley, 2 vols. Washington, DC, 1916.Google Scholar

Rechenberg, Adam. Lineamenta philosophiae civilis. Leipzig, 1693.Google Scholar

Rolleti, Johannis [pseudonym for Gottfried Klinger]. Discussio Calumniarum quas Absurdissimas de Illustri Viro Samuele Pufendorfio, Relegatus e Suecia nequam Nicolaus Beckmannus … non ita pridem in vulgus sparsit. Mannheim, 1677.Google Scholar

Rolleti, Johannis. Scarenschmidus vapulans. Stralsund, 1678.Google Scholar

Rosenkrantz, Gunde. Dissertatio juridico-politica de Legato-Suecico durante obsidione Hafniensi a Rege Daniæ jure detento. n.p., 1659.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Second Discourse, in The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge, 1997, 111–222.Google Scholar

Rojas y Spinola, Cristoforo. Regulae circa Christianorum omnium ecclesiasticam reunionem, in Publicorum negotiorum sylloge, ed. Lünig, J. C.. Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig, 1694, 1092–1124.Google Scholar

Schmauss, Johann Jacob. Neues Systema des Rechts der Natur. Göttingen, 1754.Google Scholar

Schurzfleisch, K. S. Epistolae arcanae. Halle, 1711.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Josua. Dissertatio epistolica ad eximium unum juvencum Severinum Wildschyssium. Schleswig [for Leipzig], 1688.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Josua. under pseudonym of Severinus Wildschütz, Discussio calumniarum Samuelis Pufendorfii. Slesvig, 1687.Google Scholar

[Schwartz, J. and Beckmann, N.], Index quarundam novitatum quas Dominus Samuel Pufendorff libro suo De Iure Naturae et Gentium contra orthodoxa fundamenta Londini edidit. Giessen, 1673.Google Scholar

Selden, John. De iure naturali et gentium, iuxta disciplinam Ebraeorum, libri septem. London, 1640.Google Scholar

Spener, Philipp Jakob. Schriften. Korrespondenz, ed. Beyreuther, Erich and Dietrich, Blaufuß. 16 vols. Hildesheim, 1979–2010:Google Scholar

‘Die Evangelische Glaubens-Lehre, …’ [1688], Vol. III.1. Ed. Beyreuther, Erich, Hildesheim, 1986.Google Scholar

‘Unmaßgebliche gedancken’ [1702], vol. XV/1 (1), pp. 286–95. Ed. Dietrich, Blaufuß. Hildesheim, 1987.Google Scholar

Spinola, see Rojas y Spinola, CristoforoGoogle Scholar

Spinoza, Benedict de. Theological-Political Treatise, in The Collected Works of Spinoza, 2 vols., ed. and trans. Edwin Curley. Princeton, NJ, 1985–2016, vol. II, 43–354.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedict de. Tractatus theologico-politicus. Amsterdam, 1670.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco. Disputationes metaphysicae (1866), 2 vols. Hildesheim, 1998.Google Scholar

Svenska riksrådets protokoll. X. 1643, 1644, ed. Bergh, Severin. Stockholm, 1905.Google Scholar

Svenska riksrådets protokoll. XVI. 1654–1656, ed. Sondén, Per. Stockholm, 1923.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. Dreyfache Rettung des Rechts Evangelischer Fürsten in Kirchen-Sachen [… ed. Gottfried Zeidler]. Frankfurt am Main, 1701.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. Einleitung zur Hoff-Philosophie, oder, kurtzer Entwurff und die ersten Linien von der Klugheit zu Bedencken und vernünfftig zu schliessen, trans. P. D. Berlin & Leipzig, 1712.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. ‘Von der Historie des Rechts der Natur bis auf Grotius’, Vorrede in Hugo Grotius, Vom Recht des Krieges und des Friedens. Halle, 1707.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. Institutiones iurisprudentiae divinae. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1688.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. Institutes of Divine Jurisprudence with Selections from Foundations of the Law of Nature and Nations, ed. and trans. Thomas Ahnert. Indianapolis, IN, 2011.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. Introductio ad philosophiam aulicam, seu lineae primae libri de prudentia cogitandi et ratiocinandi (1688). Halle, Magdeburg, 1702.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. Paulo plenior historia iuris naturalis. [1719], Tübingen, 1972.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Christian. Vollständige Erläuterung der Kirchen-Rechts-Gelahrtheit, Oder Gründliche Abhandlung vom Verhältniß der Religion gegen den Staat, Ueber Samuelis Puffendorffii Tract. de Habitu Religionis Christianae ad vitam civilem. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1740.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Jacob. Disputatio politica de patria potestate. s.l. [Leipzig], 1673.Google Scholar

Thomasius, Jacob. Erotemata metaphysica pro incipientibus (1670). 2nd ed. Leipzig, 1678.Google Scholar

Vattel, Emer de. The Law of Nations, or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essays on the Origin and Nature of Natural Law and on Luxury, eds. Kapossy, Bela and Whatmore, Richard, trans. Thomas Nugent and T. J. Hochstrasser. Indianapolis, IN, 2008.Google Scholar

Weigel, Erhard. Analysis Aristotelica ex Euclide restituta [1658], ed. Thomas Behme. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 2008.Google Scholar

Weigel, Erhard. Arithmetische Beschreibung der Moral-Weißheit von Personen und Sachen. [1674], ed. Behme, Thomas. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt, 2008.Google Scholar

Wildschütz, Severinus, see [Schwartz, Josua].Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Jus naturae methodo scientifica pertractatum, 8 vols. Leipzig, 1740–8.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. The Law of Nations treated according to the Scientific Method, trans. Joseph Horace Drake (rev. Thomas Ahnert), ed. Ahnert, Thomas. Indianapolis, IN, 2017.Google Scholar

Ahnert, Thomas. ‘Problematische Bindugswirkung: Zum “Epikureismus” im Naturrecht der deutschen Frühaufkläring’, in Das Naturrecht der Geselligkeit. Anthropologie, Recht und Politik im 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Fiorillo, Vanda and Grunert, Frank. Berlin, 2009, 39–54.Google Scholar

Ahnert, Thomas. ‘Samuel Pufendorf and religious intolerance in the early Enlightenment’, in Natural Law and Toleration in the Early Enlightenment, ed. Parkin, Jon and Stanton, Tim. Oxford, 2013, 15–33.Google Scholar

Ahnert, Thomas. Religion and the Origins of the German Enlightenment: Faith and the Reform of Learning in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. Rochester, NY, 2006.Google Scholar

Albrecht, Michael. Eklektik. Eine Begriffsgeschichte mit Hinweis auf die Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Leipzig and Munich, 1994.Google Scholar

Aretin, Karl Otmar von. ‘Das Reich, eine Föderation?’, in Faszinierende Frühneuzeit. Reich, Frieden, Kultur und Kommunikation 1500–1800. Festschrift für Johannes Burkhardt zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Weber, Wolfgang E. J. and Dauser, Regina. Berlin, 2008, 15–26.Google Scholar

Behme, Thomas. ‘Einleitung’, in Erhard Weigel, Analysis Aristotelica ex Euclide restituta, ed. Behme, Thomas. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt, 2008, ix–lxv.Google Scholar

Behme, Thomas. ‘Einleitung’, in Erhard Weigel: Arithmetische Beschreibung der Moral-Weißheit von Personen und Sachen, ed. Behme, Thomas. Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt, 2008, vii–xxviii.Google Scholar

Behme, Thomas. ‘Die fictio contrarii als methodisches Werkzeug in Pufendorfs Naturrechtslehre’, in Begriffe, Metaphern und Imaginationen in Philosophie und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, ed. Danneberg, L., Spoerhase, C. and Werle, D.. Wiesbaden, 2009, 266–86.Google Scholar

Behme, Thomas. ‘Introduction’, in Samuel Pufendorf, Two Books of the Elements of Universal Jurisprudence, ed. Thomas Behme, trans. William Abbott Oldfather, rev. Thomas Behme. Indianapolis, IN, 2009, ix–xvii.Google Scholar

Behme, Thomas. ‘Samuel Pufendorf als Weigel-Schüler’, in Erhard Weigel (1625–1699) und seine Schüler, ed. Habermann, Katharina and Herbst, Klaus-Dieter. Göttingen, 2016, 85–112.Google Scholar

Behme, Thomas. Samuel von Pufendorf: Naturrecht und Staat. Eine Analyse und Interpretation seiner Theorie, ihrer Grundlagen und Probleme. Göttingen, 1995.Google Scholar

Behrendt, Walter. Lehr-, Wehr- und Nährstand. Haustafelliteratur und Dreiständelehre im 16. Jahrhundert. Berlin, 2009.Google Scholar

Betz, Hans D., Browning, Don S., Janowski, Bernd and Jüngel, Eberhard (eds.). Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 8 vols. Tübingen, 1998–2005. English trans. as database: https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/religion-past-and-present.Google Scholar

Biskup, Gerhard. Die landesfürstlichen Versuche zum wirtschaftlichen Wiederaufbau der Kurpfalz nach dem 30jährigen Kriege (1648–74). Ein Beitrag zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte der Pfalz. Frankfurt am Main, 1932.Google Scholar

Blanning, Tim. ‘The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation past and present’, Historical Research, 85 (2012): 57–70.Google Scholar

Blickle, Peter. Von der Leibeigenschaft zu den Menschenrechten. Eine Geschichte der Freiheit in Deutschland. Munich, 2003.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto. ‘Leibniz e Pufendorf’, Rivista di filosofia, 38 (1947): 118–29.Google Scholar

Boucher, David and Kelly, Paul (eds.). The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls. London and New York, 1994.Google Scholar

Breuer, Dieter (ed.). Religion und Religiosität im Zeitalter des Barock. Wiesbaden, 1995.Google Scholar

Buchholz, Stephan. ‘Erunt quattuor in carne una: Aspekte der neuzeitlichen Polygamiediskussion’, in Zur Geschichte des Familien- und Erbrechts, ed. Mohnhaupt, Heinz. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 71–91.Google Scholar

Buchholz, Stephan. Recht, Religion und Ehe. Orientierungswandel und gelehrte Kontroversen im Übergang vom 17. zum 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main, 1988.Google Scholar

Buckle, Stephen. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar

Burgdorf, Wolfgang. Protokonstitutionalismus: Die Reichsverfassung in den Wahlkapitulationen der römisch-deutschen Könige und Kaiser 1519–1792. Göttingen, 2015.Google Scholar

Cairncross, John. After Polygamy Was Made a Sin: The Social History of Christian Polygamy. London, 1974.Google Scholar

Cairns, John. ‘Stoicism, slavery, and law. Grotian jurisprudence and its reception’, Grotiana, 21/22 (2001): 198–231.Google Scholar

Catana, Leo. The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’. Its Origin, Nature, Influence, and Legitimacy. Leiden and Boston, MA, 2008.Google Scholar

Christov, Theodore. Before Anarchy: Hobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar

Clark, R. Scott. ‘Christ and covenant: federal theology in orthodoxy’, in Reformed Orthodoxy, ed. Selderhuis, Herman J.. Leiden, 2013, 403–28.Google Scholar

Consortium of European Research Libraries. CERL Thesaurus: https://data.cerl.org/thesaurus/cnp01340889 (accessed on 2 October 2021).Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. ‘Autonomy in modern natural law’, in New Essays on the History of Autonomy, ed. Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry. Cambridge, 2004, 110–29.Google Scholar

Dawson, Hannah. ‘The normativity of nature in Pufendorf and Locke’, Historical Journal, 63 (2020): 528–58.Google Scholar

De Angelis, Simone. ‘Pufendorf und der Cartesianismus’, Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur, 29 (2004): 129–72.Google Scholar

Dellsperger, Rudolf. ‘Der Beitrag der “vernünftigen Orthodoxie” zur innerprotestantischen Ökumene’, in Union-Konversion-Toleranz, ed. Duchhardt, Heinz and May, Gerhard. Mainz, 2000, 289–300.Google Scholar

Denzer, Horst. Moralphilosophie und Naturrecht bei Samuel Pufendorf: Eine geistes- und wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Geburt des Naturrechts aus der Praktischen Philosophie. Munich, 1972.Google Scholar

Diesselhorst, Malte. Die Lehre des Hugo Grotius vom Versprechen. Cologne, 1959.Google Scholar

Dixon, Suzanne. ‘Family’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, ed. du Plessis, Paul J., Ando, Clifford and Tuori, Kaius. Oxford, 2016, 461–72.Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Biographisches zu Samuel von Pufendorf’, in Samuel Pufendorf und seine Wirkungen bis auf die heutige Zeit, ed. Geyer, B. and Goerlich, H.. Baden-Baden, 1996, 23–37.Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Erhard Weigels Zeit an der Universität Leipzig (1647 bis 1653)’, in Erhard Weigel 1625 bis 1699. Baroker Erzvater der deutschen Frühaufklärung, ed. Schielicke, Reinhard E., Herbst, Klaus-Dieter and Kratochwil, Stefan. Frankfurt am Main, 1999, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. Frühaufklärung und obrigkeitliche Zensur in Brandenburg: Friedrich Wilhelm Stosch und das Verfahren gegen sein Buch ‘Concordia rationis et fidei’. Berlin, 1995.Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. Pufendorf-Studien. Beiträge zur Biographie Samuel von Pufendorfs und zu seiner Entwicklung als Historiker und theologischer Schriftsteller. Berlin, 1992.Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf and toleration’, in Beyond the Persecuting Society: Toleration before the Enlightenment, ed. Laursen, John Christian and Nederman, Cary J.. Philadelphia, PA, 1997, 178–96.Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. Samuel Pufendorf in der Welt des 17. Jahrhunderts: Untersuchungen zur Biographie Pufendorfs und zu seinem Wirken als Politiker und Theologe. Frankfurt am Main, 2012:Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Die Kritik Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz an Samuel von Pufendorf. Eine Auseinandersetzung im Vorfeld der Aufklärung’, 309–38. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Das Lebensende von Samuel Pufendorf’, 155–80. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Die Privatbibliothek Samuel von Pufendorfs’, 339–57. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel Pufendorf als Student in Leipzig’, 1–43. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf als Verfasser politischer Gutachten und Streitschriften’, 181–223. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel von Pufendorfs Berufung nach Brandenburg-Preuβen’, 131–54. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Samuel Pufendorf und die Heidelberger Universität in der Mitte des 17. Jahrhunderts’, 45–77. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Die Universität Leipzig im Zeitalter der Aufklrung. Geschichte, Stand und Perspektiven der Forschung’, Historisches Jahrbuch, 122 (2002): 413–61. Google Scholar

Döring, Detlef. ‘Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der theologischen und religionspolitischen Vorstellungen Samuel von Pufendorfs’, in Religion und Religiosität im Zeitalter des Barock, ed. D. Breuer et al. Wiesbaden, 1995, 873–82. Google Scholar

Drakopoulou, Maria. ‘Samuel Pufendorf, feminism and the question of “women and law”’, in Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy, ed. Drakopoulou, Maria. London, 2013, 66–91.Google Scholar

Dreitzel, Horst. ‘Zur Entwicklung und Eigenart der eklektischen Philosophie’, Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 18 (1991): 281–343.Google Scholar

Dreitzel, Horst. ‘Naturrecht als politische Philosophie’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 836–48.Google Scholar

Dreitzel, Horst. ‘The reception of Hobbes in the political philosophy of the early German Enlightenment’, History of European Ideas, 29 (2003): 255–89.Google Scholar

Dreitzel, Horst. ‘Samuel Pufendorf’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 757–812.Google Scholar

Droysen, Johann Gustav. ‘Zur Kritik Pufendorfs’ [1864], Abhandlungen zur neueren Geschichte. Leipzig, 1876, 307–86.Google Scholar

Dufour, Alfred. ‘L’influence de la méthodologie des sciences physiques et mathématiques sur les fondateurs de l’école du droit naturel moderne (Grotius, Hobbes, Pufendorf)’, in Grotius, ed. John Dunn and Ian Harris. Lyme, NH, 1997, 93–110. (Originally in Grotiana 1, n.s. (1980): 33–52).Google Scholar

Dufour, Alfred. Le mariage dans l’école allemande du droit naturel moderne au XVIIIe siècle. Paris, 1972.Google Scholar

Dufour, Alfred. ‘Pufendorf’, in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., Goldie, M.. Cambridge, 1991, 561–88.Google Scholar

Edelstein, Dan. On the Spirit of Rights. Chicago, IL, 2019.Google Scholar

Fleming, Julia A. Defending Probabilism, the Moral Theology of Juan Caramuel. Washington, DC, 2006.Google Scholar

Formigari, Lia. A History of Language Philosophies. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA, 2004.Google Scholar

Franke, Bernd. Sklaverei und Unfreiheit im Naturrecht des 17. Jahrhunderts. Hildesheim, 2009.Google Scholar

Friedeburg, Robert von. Luther’s Legacy. The Thirty Years War and the Modern Notion of ‘State’ in the Empire, 1530s to 1790s. Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar

Friedeburg, Robert von and Seidler, Michael J.. ‘The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation’, in European Political Thought 1450–1700: Religion, Law and Philosophy, ed. Lloyd, Howell A., Burgess, Glenn and Hodson, Simon. New Haven, CT and London, 2008, 102–72.Google Scholar

Friedenthal, Meelis, Marti, Hanspeter and Seidel, Robert (eds.). Early Modern Disputations and Dissertations in an Interdisciplinary and European Context. Boston, MA, 2020.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Peter. ‘Karl I. Ludwig’, Neue Deutsche Biographie, 11 (1977), 246–9, available at www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd118560182.html, accessed 12 January 2019.Google Scholar

Gallati, Frieda. ‘Der Königlich Schwedische in Teutschland geführte Krieg’ des Bogislav Philipp von Chemnitz und seine Quellen. Frauenfeld, 1902.Google Scholar

Gángó, Gábor. ‘Ernst König’, in Natural Law 1625–1850: Database, ed. Jensen, Mikkel Munthe, (Erfurt, Gotha, Jena: ThULB, 2019–), [Online Database at http://naturallawdatabase.thulb.uni-jena.de].Google Scholar

Gángó, Gábor. ‘Johann Christian von Boineburg, Samuel Pufendorf, and the foundation myth of modern natural law’, History of European Ideas, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2022.2099044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Aaron. ‘Seventeenth century moral philosophy: self-help, self-knowledge, and the devil’s mountain’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics, ed. Crisp, Roger. Oxford, 2013, 229–79.Google Scholar

Garrett, Aaron. ‘Spinoza as natural lawyer’, Cardozo Law Review, 25 (2003): 627–41.Google Scholar

Gelderen, Martin van. ‘Aristotelians, monarchomachs and republicans: sovereignty and respublica mixta in Dutch and German political thought, 1580–1650’, in Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage, ed. van Gelderen, M. and Skinner, Q., 2 vols. Cambridge, 2002, vol. 1: 195–217.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. ‘Humanism and political theory’, in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, M.. Cambridge, 1991, 9–29.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge, MA, 1991.Google Scholar

Groenland, Juliette A. ‘Humanism in the classroom’, in The Making of the Humanities, Volume I: Early Modern Europe, ed. Bod, R., Maat, J. and Weststeijn, T.. Amsterdam, 2010, 199–229.Google Scholar

Gross, Hanns. Empire and Sovereignty: A History of the Public Law Literature in the Holy Roman Empire, 1599–1804. Chicago, IL, 1973.Google Scholar

Grunert, Frank. ‘“Handel mit Herrn Hector Gottfried Masio.” Zur Pragmatik des Streits in den Kontroversen mit dem Kopenhagener Hofprediger’, in Appell an das Publikum. Die öffentliche Debatte in der deutschen Aufklärung 1687–1796, ed. Goldenbaum, Ursula, Berlin, 2004, 119–74.Google Scholar

Grunert, Frank. ‘Das Recht der Natur als Recht des Gefühls: Zur Naturrechtslehre von Johann Jacob Schmauss’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik. Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 12 (2004): 139–53.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Christian Wolff (1679–1754)’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, ed. Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne. Oxford, 2012, 1106–9.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ‘The English context of a Scotsman’s translation of German natural law: Turnbull and Heineccius’, in Love as the Principle of Natural Law, ed. Grunert, Frank and Haakonssen, Knud. Leiden, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ‘German natural law’, in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, ed. Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert. Cambridge, 2006, 251–90.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Holberg’s Law of Nature and Nations’, in Ludvig Holberg (1684–1754). Learning and Literature in the Nordic Enlightenment, ed. Haakonssen, Knud and Olden-Jørgensen, Sebastian. London, 2017, 59–79.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Natural jurisprudence and the identity of the Scottish Enlightenment’, in Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain: New Case Studies, ed. Savage, R.. Oxford, 2012, 258–77.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. ‘Protestant natural-law theory: a general interpretation’, in New Essays on the History of Autonomy: A Collection Honoring J. B. Schneewind, ed. Brender, N. and Krasnoff, L.. Cambridge, 2004, 92–109.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud (ed.). Grotius, Pufendorf and Modern Natural Law. Aldershot, 1999.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy. From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar

Haara, Heikki. ‘Pufendorf on passions and sociability’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 77 (2016): 423–44.Google Scholar

Haara, Heikki and Stuart-Buttle, Tim. ‘The problem of sociability after Hobbes: Pufendorf and Locke and the politics of recognition’, in Passions, Politics and the Limits of Society, ed. Haara, Heikki, Stapelbroek, Koen and Immanen, Mikko. Oldenbourg, 2020, 177–94.Google Scholar

Haas, Julia. Die Reichstheorie in Pufendorfs ‘Severinus de Monzambano’: Monstrositätsthese und Reichsdebatte im Spiegel der politisch-juristischen Literatur von 1667 bis heute. Berlin, 2006.Google Scholar

Habermann, Katharina and Herbst, Klaus-Dieter (eds.). Erhard Weigel (1625–1699) und seine Schüler. Göttingen, 2016.Google Scholar

Häfner, Ralph. ‘Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philologie um 1700. Zum Verhältnis von Polymathie und Aporetik bei Jacob Friedrich Reimman, Christian Thomasius und Johann Albert Fabricius’, in Philologie und Erkenntnis: Beiträge zu Begriff und Problem frühneuzeitlicher ‘Philologie’, ed. Häfner, Ralph. Tübingen, 2001, 95–128.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Zum Fortwirken von Pufendorfs Naturrechtslehre an den Universitäten des Heiligen Römisches Reiches Deutscher Nation während des 18. Jahrhunderts’, in Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982, ed. Modéer, Kjell Å.. Lund, 1986, 31–51.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Relations with authority’, in A History of the University in Europe, Volume II: Universities in Early Modern Europe (1500–1800), ed. Ridder-Symoens, Hilda de. Cambridge, 1996, 114–54.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Samuel Pufendorf’, in Staatsdenker im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Reichspublizistik – Politik – Naturrecht, ed. Stolleis, Michael. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 172–96.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker. ‘Universitäten – Territorialstaaten – Gelehrte Räte’, in Die Rolle der Juristen bei der Enstehung des modernen Staates, ed. Schnur, R.. Berlin, 1986, 687–735.Google Scholar

Hartung, Gerald. ‘Von Grotius zu Pufendorf. Die Herkunft des säkularisierten Strafrechts aus dem Kriegsrecht der Frühen Neuzeit’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung, ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 123–36.Google Scholar

Heckel, Martin. ‘Itio in partes: Zur Religionsverfassung des Heiligen Römischen Reiches Deutscher Nation’, in Heckel, Martin, Gesammelte Schriften: Staat, Kirche, Recht, Geschichte, vol. 2, ed. Schlaich, Klaus. Tübingen, 1989, 636–736.Google Scholar

Heppe, Heinrich. Reformierte Dogmatik. Neu dargestellt und aus den Quellen belegt. Neukirchen, 1935.Google Scholar

Heydt, Colin. Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain: God, Self, and Other. Cambridge, 2018.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, Nancy J. ‘Hobbes on the family’, in The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, ed. Martinich, A. P. and Kinch, Hoechstra. Oxford, 2016, 242–63.Google Scholar

Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Wright, Joane H. (eds.). Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. University Park, PA, 2012.Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, T. J. ‘The claims of conscience: natural law theory, obligation, and resistance in the Huguenot diaspora’, in New Studies in the Political Thought of the Huguenots of the Refuge, ed. Laursen, J. C.. Leiden, 1995, 15–51.Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, T. J.. ‘Conscience and reason – the natural law theory of Jean Barbeyrac’, Historical Journal, 36 (1993): 289–308 [reprinted in Grotius, Pufendorf and Modern Natural Law, ed. K. Haakonssen. Aldershot, 1999, 381–400].Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, T. J.. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge, 2000.Google Scholar

Holland, Ben. ‘Pufendorf’s theory of facultative sovereignty: on the configuration of the soul of the state’, History of Political Thought, 33 (2012): 427–54.Google Scholar

Holland, Ben. The Moral Person of the State: Pufendorf, Sovereignty and Composite Polities. Cambridge, 2017.Google Scholar

Holzhey, Helmut. ‘Philosophie als Eklektik’, Studia Leibnitiana, XV (1983): 19–29.Google Scholar

Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm (eds.). Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das Heilige Römische Reich Deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa. Basel, 2001.Google Scholar

Holzhey, Helmut and Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘Christian Thomasius’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 1165–1202.Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google Scholar

Hont, Istvan. Politics in Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. Cambridge, MA, 2015.Google Scholar

Hüning, Dieter. ‘“Is not the power to punish essentially a power that pertains to the state?” The different foundations of the right to punish in early modern natural law doctrines’, in Politisches Denken, Jahrbuch 2004, ed. Graf Ballestrem, K., Gerhardt, V., Ottmann, H. and Thompson, M. P.. Berlin, 2004, 43–60.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘The invention of human nature: the intention and reception of Pufendorf’s entia moralia doctrine’, History of European Ideas, 45 (2019): 933–52.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘Johann Jakob Moser and Immanuel Kant on public law and the German religious constitution’, in Kant and his German Contemporaries, Volume II: Aesthetics, History, Politics, and Religion, ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. Cambridge, 2018, 150–69.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘Kant and Vattel in context: cosmopolitan philosophy and diplomatic casuistry’, History of European Ideas, 39 (2013): 477–502.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘The law of nature and nations’, in The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Garrett, Aaron. Abingdon, 2015, 559–92.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘Natural law as political philosophy’, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, ed. Clark, Desmond and Wilson, Catherine. Oxford, 2011, 475–99.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘Public law and the limits of philosophy: German idealism and the religious constitution’, Critical Inquiry, 44 (2018): 528–53.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. ‘Secularization: the birth of a modern combat concept’, Modern Intellectual History, 12 (2015): 1–32.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian. The Secularisation of the Confessional State. The Political Thought of Christian Thomasius. Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar

Jägerskjöld, S. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf in Schweden 1668–1688. Einige neue Beiträge’, in Satvra Roberto Feenstra sexagesimum qvintum annvm aetatis complenti ab alvmnis collegis amicis oblata, ed. Ankum, J. A., Spruit, J. E., Wubbe, F. B. J.. Fribourg, 1985, 557–70.Google Scholar

Jensen, Mads Langballe. ‘Serving Danish foreign policy: Andreas Hojer’s De eo quod iure belli licet in minores (1735)’, in The Law of Nations and Natural Law 1625–1850, ed. Zurbuchen, Simone. Leiden, 2019, 39–59.Google Scholar

Jones, Tom. ‘Theories of language in the eighteenth century’, in Literature, Literary Studies 1701–1800, Oxford Handbooks Online (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935338.013.100.Google Scholar

Jong, W. R. D. de and Betti, A.. ‘The classical model of science: a millennia-old model of scientific rationality’, Synthese, 174 (2010): 185–203.Google Scholar

Jounannet, Emmanuelle. ‘Emer De Vattel (1714–1767)’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, ed. Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne. Oxford, 2012, 1118–21.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Thomas. Konfession und Kultur. Lutherischer Protestantismus in der zweiten Hälfte des Reformationsjahrhunderts. Tübingen, 2020.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. ‘Eclecticism and the history of ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 62 (2001): 577–92.Google Scholar

Kelly, Kristin A. ‘Private family, private individual: John Locke’s distinction between paternal and political power’, Social Theory and Practice, 28 (2002): 361–80.Google Scholar

Kersting, Wolfgang. Die politische Philosophie des Gesellschaftsvertrags. Darmstadt, 1996.Google Scholar

Kischkel, Thomas. Die Spruchtätigkeit der Giessener Juristenfakultät. Grundlagen, Verlauf, Inhalt. Hildesheim etc., 2016.Google Scholar

Klippel, Diethelm (ed.). Naturrecht im 19. Jahrhundert. Kontinuität, Inhalt, Funktion, Wirkung. Goldbach, 1997.Google Scholar

Knott, Martin Otero. ‘Cocceji on sociality’, History of European Ideas, 48 (2022): 351–66.Google Scholar

Knott, Martin Otero. ‘Samuel Cocceji on the foundations of natural law’, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar

Korkmann, Petter. ‘Voluntarism and moral obligation: Barbeyrac’s defence of Pufendorf revisited’, in Early Modern Natural Law Theories: Contexts and Strategies in Early Enlightenment, ed. Hochstrasser, T. J. and Schröder, P.. Dordrecht, 2003, 195–225.Google Scholar

Krawczuk, Wojciech. Samuel Pufendorf and Some Stories of the Northern War 1655–1660. Kraków, 2014.Google Scholar

Kraye, Jill. ‘Conceptions of moral philosophy’, in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael, 2 vols. Cambridge, 1998, vol. 2, 1279–1316.Google Scholar

Kraye, Jill. ‘Philologists and Philosophers’, in The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Kraye, Jill. Cambridge, 1996, 142–60.Google Scholar

Krieger, Leonard. ‘History and law in the seventeenth century: Pufendorf’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 21 (1960): 198–210.Google Scholar

Krieger, Leonard. ‘Samuel Pufendorf’, in Deutsche Historiker, vol. 9, ed. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. Göttingen, 1982, 7–22.Google Scholar

Krieger, Leonard. The German Idea of Freedom. History of a Political Tradition. Chicago, IL, 1957.Google Scholar

Krieger, Leonard. The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law. Chicago, IL, 1965.Google Scholar

Lehmann-Brauns, Sicco. Weisheit in der Weltgeschichte: Philosophiegeschichte zwischen Barok und Aufklärung. Tübingen, 2004.Google Scholar

Levitin, Dmitri. ‘From sacred history to the history of religion: Paganism, judaism, and Christianity in European historiography from Reformation to “Enlightenment”’, The Historical Journal, 55 (2012): 1117–60.Google Scholar

Levitin, Dmitri. Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700. Cambridge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Wenchao, Poser, Hans and Rudolph, Hartmut (eds.). Leibniz und die Ökumene. Wiesbaden, 2013.Google Scholar

Lifschitz, Avi. ‘The arbitrariness of the linguistic sign: variations on an Enlightenment theme’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 73 (2012): 537–57.Google Scholar

Link, Christoph, ‘Johann Stephan Pütter’, in Staatsdenker im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Reichspublizistik – Politik – Naturrecht, ed. Stolleis, Michael. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 310-31.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Bernd. Die Wiederentdeckung des Epikureischen Naturrechts. Zu Thomas Hobbes’ philosophischer Entwicklung von De Cive zum Leviathan im Pariser Exil 1640–1651. Frankfurt am Main, 1998.Google Scholar

Luig, Klaus. ‘Zur Verbreitung des Naturrechts in Europa’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 60 (1972): 539–57.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. ‘Hobbes and Spinoza’, in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002, 27–52.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. ‘Hobbes’s science of politics and his theory of science’, in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002, 146–55.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. ‘Hobbes’s theory of international relations’, in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002, 432–56.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford, 2002.Google Scholar

Malmström, Oscar. Samuel Pufendorf och hans arbeten i Sveriges historia. Stockholm, 1899.Google Scholar

Maryks, Robert Aleksander. Saint Cicero and the Jesuits. The Influence of the Liberal Arts on the Adoption of Moral Probabilism. Burlington, VT, 2008.Google Scholar

Meinecke, Friedrich. Die Idée der Staatsräson in der neueren Geschichte. Berlin and Munich, 1924.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. ‘The metaphysics of the Theological-Political Treatise’, in Spinoza’s ‘Theological-Political Treatise’: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael A.. Cambridge, 2010, 128–42.Google Scholar

Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael. ‘Gershom Carmichael and the natural jurisprudence tradition in eighteenth-century Scotland’, in Wealth and Virtue. The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael. Cambridge, 1983, 73–87.Google Scholar

Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael. ‘Natural sociability and natural rights in the moral philosophy of Gershom Carmichael’, in Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Hope, Vincent. Edinburgh, 1984, 1–12.Google Scholar

Moss, Ann. ‘Monita et exempla politica as example of a genre’, in (Un)masking the Realities of Power. Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe, ed. Bom, Erik de, Janssens, Marijke, Van Houdt, Toon and Papy, Jan. Leiden, 2011, 97–114.Google Scholar

Mulsow, Martin. ‘Christian Humanism in the age of critical philology: Ralph Häfner’s Gods in Exile’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 70 (2009): 659–67.Google Scholar

Mulsow, Martin. ‘Eclecticism or skepticism? A problem of the early enlightenment’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 58 (1997): 465–77.Google Scholar

Mulsow, Martin. Radikale Frühaufklärung in Deutschland 1680–1720, 2 vols. Göttingen, 2018. Vol. 2: Clandestine Vernunft.Google Scholar

Nanz, Klaus-Peter. Die Entstehung des allgemeinen Vertragsbegriffs im 16. und 18. Jahrhundert. Munich, 1985.Google Scholar

Niléhn, Lars. ‘On the use of natural law. Samuel Pufendorf as royal Swedish state historian’, in Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982. Et rätshistoriskt symposium i Lund 15–16 januari 1982, ed. Modéer, Kjell Å.. Stockholm, 1986, 52–70.Google Scholar

Nischan, Bodo. ‘The exorcism controversy and baptism in the late Reformation’, Sixteenth Century Journal, 18 (1987): 31–52.Google Scholar

Nischan, Bodo. Prince, People, and Confession: The Second Reformation in Brandenburg. Philadelphia, PA, 1994.Google Scholar

Nokkala, Ere. From Natural Law to Political Economy: J. H. G. von Justi on State, Commerce and International Order. Münster, 2019.Google Scholar

Oakley, Francis. Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas. New York, 2005.Google Scholar

Oestreich, Gerhard. ‘Die antike Literatur als Vorbild der praktischen Wissenschaften im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert’, in Classical Influences on European Culture A. D. 500–1500, ed. Bolgar, R. R.. Cambridge, 1971, 315–24.Google Scholar

Oestreich, Gerhard. ‘Die Bedeutung des niederländischen Späthumanismus für Brandenburg-Preußen’, in Humanismus und Naturrecht in Berlin-Brandenburg-Preussen, ed. Thieme, H.. Berlin, 1979, 16–28.Google Scholar

Olsthoorn, Johann. ‘Grotius and Pufendorf’, in Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Ethics, ed. Angier, Tom. Cambridge, 2019, 51–70.Google Scholar

Paasch, Kathrin. Die Bibliothek des Johann Christian von Boineburg (1622–1672). Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Die Bibliothek Samuel Pufendorfs’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Früaufklarung: Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, F. and Hartung, G.. Berlin, 1996, 29–39.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Le due lettere di Pufendorf al Barone di Boineburg: quella nota e quella “perduta”’, Nouvelles de la république des lettres, 1 (1984): 119–44.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Jean Barbeyrac’, in Natural Law 1625–1850: Database, ed. Jensen, Mikkel Munthe. Erfurt, Gotha, Jena: ThULB, 2019–. [Online Database], online at https://naturallawdatabase.thulb.uni-jena.de/item/natlaw_198.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘Pufendorf on Milton and divorce’, Neulateinisches Jahrbuch, 3 (2001): 117–24.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. ‘S. Pufendorf lettore di Guicciardini’, La Cultura. Rivista de Filosofia Letteratura e Storia, XXII (1984): 44-93.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. Die Berliner Huguenotten und der Fall Barbeyrac. Orthodoxe und ‘Sozinianer’ im Refuge (1685-1720). Leiden and Boston, MA, 2011.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. La biblioteca di Samuel Pufendorf. Catalogo dell’asta di Berlin del settembre 1697. Wiesbaden, 1999.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. Discussioni seicentesche su Samuel Pufendorf. Scritti Latini: 1663–1700. Bologna, 1978.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. Samuel Pufendorf discepolo di Hobbes. Per una reinterpretazione del giusnaturalismo moderno. Bologna, 1990.Google Scholar

Palladini, Fiammetta. Samuel Pufendorf, Disciple of Hobbes: For a Reinterpretation of Modern Natural Law, trans. David Saunders. Leiden, 2019.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA, 1988.Google Scholar

Petersen, Hans. ‘Johann Christian von Boineburg und die Mainzer Irenik des 17. Jahrhunderts’, in Union-Konversion-Toleranz, ed. Duchhardt, Heinz and May, Gerhard. Mainz, 2000, 105–18.Google Scholar

Petersen, Peter. Geschichte der Aristotelischen Philosophie im Protestantischen Deutschland. Hamburg, 1921.Google Scholar

Piirimäe, Eva and Schmidt, Alexander. ‘Introduction: between morality and anthropology – sociability in enlightenment thought’, History of European Ideas, 41 (2015): 571–88.Google Scholar

Piirimäe, Pärtel. ‘Politics and history: an unholy alliance? Samuel Pufendorf as official historiographer’, in Rund um die Meere des Nordens. Festschrift für Hain Rebas, ed. Engelbrecht, Michael, Hanssen-Decker, Ulrike and Höffker, Daniel. Heide, 2008, 237–52.Google Scholar

Pink, Thomas. ‘Natural law and the theory of moral obligation’, in Psychology and Philosophy: Inquiries into the Soul from Late Scholasticism to Contemporary Thought, ed. Heinämaa, Sara and Reuter, Martina. Dordrecht, 2009, 97–114.Google Scholar

Pomata, Gianna and Siraisi, Nancy G.. ‘Introduction’, in Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe, ed. Pomata, Gianna and Siraisi, Nancy G.. Cambridge, MA, 2005, 1–38.Google Scholar

Pomata, Gianna and Siraisi, Nancy G. (eds.). Historia: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google Scholar

Ranke, Leopold von. ‘Analekten II. Nachträglich zum dritten Buche. Über Chemnitz und Pufendorf, mit einigen Bemerkungen zur Schlacht von Fehrbellin’, in Zwölf Bücher preuβischer Geschichte. Leipzig, 1874, vols. 3–4 [books 5–9], 594–606.Google Scholar

Ranum, Orest. Artisans of Glory. Writers and Historical Thought in Seventeenth-Century France. Chapel Hill, NC, 1980.Google Scholar

Reill, Hanns Peter. The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Berkeley, CA, 1975.Google Scholar

Remer, Gary. ‘Justus Lipsius, morally acceptable deceit and prudence in the Ciceronian tradition’, History of Political Thought, 37 (2016): 238–70.Google Scholar

Röd, Wolfgang. ‘Erhard Weigels Lehre von den entia moralia’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 51 (1969): 58–84.Google Scholar

Röd, Wofgang. Geometrischer Geist und Naturrecht. Methodengeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur Staatsphilosophie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Munich, 1970.Google Scholar

Röding, Hans. Pufendorf als Historiker und Politiker in den ‘Commentarii de rebus gestis Friderici Tertii’. Halle, 1912.Google Scholar

Roeck, Bernd. Reichssystem und Reichsherkommen: Die Diskussion über die Staatlichkeit des Reiches in der politischen Publizistik des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart, 1984.Google Scholar

Rørvik, Thor Inge. ‘The law of nations at the Naval Academy in Copenhagen around 1800: the lectures of Christian Krohg’, in The Law of Nations and Natural Law, 1625-1800, ed. Zurbuchen, Simone. Leiden, 2019, 60–88.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, Helena. Rousseau and Geneva. From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762. Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Donald. ‘Spinoza’s conception of law: metaphysics and ethics’, in Spinoza’s ‘Theological-Political Treatise’: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael A.. Cambridge, 2010, 143–67.Google Scholar

Saastamoinen, Kari. ‘Pufendorf and the stoic model of natural law’, Grotiana, 20/21 (1999/2000): 257–70.Google Scholar

Saastamoinen, Kari. The Morality of the Fallen Man: Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law. Helsinki, 1995.Google Scholar

Sagar, Paul. ‘Of mushrooms and method: history and the family in Hobbes’s science of politics’, European Journal of Political Theory, 14 (2015): 98–117.Google Scholar

Sagar, Paul. The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith. Princeton, NJ, 2018.Google Scholar

Salatowsky, Sascha. ‘Dic cur hic? Die philosophische Ethik der Lutheraner im frühen 17. Jahrhundert’, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch 11 (2006): 103–58.Google Scholar

Salatowsky, Sascha. De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA, 2006.Google Scholar

Salzer, Ernst. Der Übertritt des Grossen Kurfürsten von der schwedischen auf die polnische Seite während des ersten nordischen Krieges in Pufendorfs ‘Carl Gustav’ und ‘Friedrich Wilhelm’. Heidelberg, 1904.Google Scholar

Scattola, Merio. ‘Das Naturrecht der Triebe, oder das Ende des Naturrechts: Johann Jakob Schmauß und Johann Christian Claproth’, in Das Naturrecht der Geselligkeit: Anthropologie, Recht und Politik im 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Fiorillo, Vanda and Grunert, Frank. Berlin, 2009, 231–50.Google Scholar

Scattola, Merio. ‘“Ein Stein des Anstosses”: Thomas Hobbes und die deutsche Naturrechtslehre des siebzehnten und achtzehnten Jahrhunderts’, in Der lange Schatten des Leviathan. Hobbes’ politische Philosophie nach 350 Jahren, ed. Hüning, Dieter. Berlin, 2005, 331–54.Google Scholar

Schaab, Meinrad, Geschichte der Kurpfalz, 2 vols. Stuttgart, 1988–92. Vol. 2: Neuzeit.Google Scholar

Schindling, Anton. ‘Schulen und Universitäten im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. Zehn Thesen zu Bildungsexpansion, Laienbildung und Konfessionalisierung nach der Reformation’, in Ecclesia Militans. Studien zur Konzilien- und Reformationsgeschichte Remigius Bäumer zum 70. Geburtstag gewidmet, ed. W. Brandmüller, H. Immenkötter and E. Iserloh. Paderborn, 1988, 561–70.Google Scholar

Schlaich, Klaus. Kollegialtheorie: Kirche, Recht und Staat in der Aufklärung. Munich, 1969.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Alexander. ‘Unsociable sociability and the crisis of natural law: Michael Hissmann (1752–1784) on the state of nature’, History of European Ideas, 41 (2015): 619–39.Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B. ‘Pufendorf’s place in the history of ethics’, Synthese, 72 (1987): 123–55.Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B.. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Schneider, Bernd Christian. Ius reformandi: Die Entwicklung eines Staatskirchenrechts von seinen Anfängen bis zum Ende des Alten Reiches. Tübingen, 2001.Google Scholar

Schneider, Hans-Peter. ‘Christliches Naturrecht’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 813–35.Google Scholar

Schneider, Hans-Peter. Justitia Universalis. Quellenstudien zur Geschichte des ‘Christlichen Naturrechts’ bei Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Frankfurt am Main, 1967.Google Scholar

Schneider, Ulrich Johannes. ‘Eclecticism and the history of philosophy’, in History and the Disciplines, ed. Donald R. Kelley. Rochester, NY, 1997, 83–102.Google Scholar

Schnettger, Matthias. Kaiser und Reich: Eine Verfassungsgeschichte (1500–1806). Stuttgart, 2020.Google Scholar

Scholz, Luca. ‘Leibeigenschaft rechtfertigen: Kontroversen um Ursprung und Legitimität der Leibeigenschaft im Wildfangstreit’, Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 45 (2018): 41-81.Google Scholar

Schröder, Jan. ‘The concept of (natural) law in the doctrine of law and natural law of the early modern era’, in Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Stolleis, Michael. Farnham, 2008, 57–71.Google Scholar

Schröder, Jan. ‘Naturrecht in den Tübinger Konsilien von Wolfgang Adam Schöpf’, in Naturrecht und Staat in der Neuzeit. Diethelm Klippel zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Eisfeld, J., Otto, M., Pahlow, L. and Zwanzger, M.. Tübingen, 2013, 101–12.Google Scholar

Schröder, Jan and Pielemeier, Ines. ‘Naturrecht als Lehrfach an den deutschen Universitäten des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts’, in Naturrecht – Spätaufklärung – Revolution, ed. Dann, Otto and Klippel, Diethelm. Hamburg, 1995, 255–69.Google Scholar

Schröder, Peter. ‘The constitution of the Holy Roman Empire after 1648: Samuel Pufendorf’s assessment in his Monzambano’, The Historical Journal, 42 (1990): 961–83.Google Scholar

Schubert, Anselm. Das Ende der Sünde. Anthropologie und Erbsünde zwischen Reformation und Aufklärung. Göttingen 2002.Google Scholar

Schultze, Johannes. ‘Der Geschichtsschreiber Samuel von Pufendorf. Eine Episode’, Forschungen zur brandenburgischen und preuβischen Geschichte, 55 (1944): 169–80.Google Scholar

Schwab, Dieter. ‘Der Staat im Naturrecht der Scholastik’, in Naturrecht und Staat: Politische Funktionen des europäischen Naturrechts (17.–19. Jahrhundert), ed. Klippel, Diethelm and Elisabeth, Müller-Luckner. Munich, 2006, 1–18.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J. ‘Economising natural law: Pufendorf on moral quantities and sumptuary legislation’, in Philosophy, Rights and Natural Law: Essays in Honour of Knud Haakonssen, ed. Hunter, Ian and Whatmore, Richard. Edinburgh, 2019, 241–77.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Introductory essay’, in Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Natural State of Men. The 1678 Latin Edition and English Translation, ed. and trans. Seidler, Michael J.. Lewiston, NY, 1990, 1–69.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘“Monstrous” Pufendorf: sovereignty and system in the Dissertations’, in Monarchism and Absolutism in Early Modern Europe, ed. Burgess, Glenn and Cuttica, Cesare. London, 2011, 159–76.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Natural law and history. Pufendorf’s philosophical historiography’, in History and the Disciplines. The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, ed. Kelley, Donald R.. Rochester, NY, 1997, 203–22.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘The politics of self-preservation: toleration and identity in Pufendorf and Locke’, in Early Modern Natural Law Theories, ed. T. J. Hochstrasser and Peter Schröder (Dordrecht, 2003), 227–55.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Pufendorf and the politics of recognition’, in Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought, ed. Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David. Basingstoke, 2002, 235–51.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Pufendorf’s moral and political philosophy’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA, 2015. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pufendorf-moral/.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘Qualification and standing in Pufendorf’s two English revolutions’, in Widerstandsrecht in der frühen Neuzeit. Erträge und Perspektiven der Forschung im deutsch-britischen Vergleich, ed. von Friedeburg, Robert. Berlin, 2001, 329–51.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘“Turkish judgment” and the English Revolution: Pufendorf on the right of resistance’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung. Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 83–104.Google Scholar

Seidler, Michael J.. ‘“Wer mir gutes thut, den liebe ich.” Pufendorf on patriotism and political loyalty’, in ‘Patria’ und Patrioten vor dem Patriotismus. Pflichten, Rechte, Glauben und die Rekonfigurierung europäischer Gemeinswesen im 17. Jahrhundert, ed. von Friedeburg, Robert. Wiesbaden, 2005, 335–65.Google Scholar

Silnizki, Michael. Geschichte des gelehrten Rechts in Rußland. ‘Jurisprudencija’ an den Universitäten des Russischen Reiches 1700–1835. Frankfurt am Main, 1997.Google Scholar

Silvestrini, Gabriella. ‘Rousseau, Pufendorf and the eighteenth-century natural law tradition’, History of European Ideas, 36 (2010): 280–301.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. Cambridge, 2018.Google Scholar

Sommer, Wolfgang. Politik, Theologie und Frömmigkeit im Luthertum der Frühen Neuzeit. Göttingen, 1999.Google Scholar

Sparn, Walter. ‘Das Bekenntnis des Philosophen. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz als Philosoph und Theologe’, Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie, 28 (1986): 139–78.Google Scholar

Sparn, Walter. ‘Die fundamentaltheologische Fixierung des Anticalvinismus’, in Calvinismus, ed. Selderhuis, Herman J.. Göttingen, 2013, 127–50.Google Scholar

Sparn, Walter. ‘Menschsein: Substanz und Modus: Balthasar Meisners Anthropologia sacra im interkonfessionellen Kontext’, in De homine. Anthropologien in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Sascha Salatowsky and Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann. Stuttgart Wiesbaden, 2021, 217–36.Google Scholar

Sparn, Walter. ‘Religiöse Toleranz am Maß politischer Klugheit. Johann Gerhard und Theophil Lessing zur staatlichen Religionspolitik’, in Dulding religiöser Vielfalt — Sorge um die wahre Religion. Toleranzdebatten in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Salatowsky, Sascha and Schröder, Winfried. Stuttgart, 2016, 39–57.Google Scholar

Sparn, Walter. ‘Theologie [Leibniz]’, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Band 4: Das heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation, Nord- und Ostmitteleuropa, ed. Holzhey, Helmut and Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm. Basel, 2001, 1079–90.Google Scholar

Sparn, Walter. Wiederkehr der Metaphysik. Die ontologische Frage in der lutherischen Theologie des frühen 17. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart, 1976.Google Scholar

Sprenger, Gerhard. ‘Der Einfluß der Naturwissenschaften auf das Denken Samuel Pufendorfs’, in Samuel Pufendorf und seine Wirkungen bis auf die heutige Zeit, ed. Geyer, Bodo and Helmut, Goerlich. Baden-Baden, 1996, 165–93.Google Scholar

Sreedhar, Susanne. ‘Pufendorf on patriarchy’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31 (2014): 209–27.Google Scholar

Stade, Arne. Erik Dahlberg och Carl X Gustafs krigshistoria. Stockholm, 1967.Google Scholar

Stanglin, Keith G. Beyond Dordt and ‘De Auxiliis’. The Dynamics of Protestant and Catholic Soteriology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Leiden, 2019.Google Scholar

Stegmann, Andreas. ‘Das Lehrstück der benevolentia universalis in den Textgattungen des akademischen Unterrichts im Luthertum des 17. Jh.’, in Prädestination und Willensfreiheit, ed. Härle, Wilfried. Leipzig, 2009, 125–34.Google Scholar

Steiger, Johann Anselm. ‘The development of the Reformation legacy. Hermeneutics and interpretation of Sacred Scripture in the age of orthodoxy’, in Hebrew Bible / Old Testament. The History of its Interpretation, ed. Sæbø, Magne, 2 vols. Göttingen, 2000–8, vol. 2, 691–757.Google Scholar

Steiger, Johann Anselm. Philologia sacra. Zur Exegese der Heiligen Schrift im Protestantismus des 16.–18. Jahrhunderts. Neukirchen-Vluyn, 2011.Google Scholar

Stephenson, John. ‘Sacraments in Lutheranism, 1600–1800’, in The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theology, ed. Lehner, Ulrich L. et al. Oxford, 2016, 341–58.Google Scholar

Stern, Robert. Kantian Ethics: Value, Agency and Obligation. Oxford, 2015.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael. ‘The legitimation of law through God, tradition, will, nature and constitution’, in Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, ed. Daston, Lorraine and Stolleis, Michael. Farnham, 2008, 45–56.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael. Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland, 4 vols. Munich, 1988–2012. Vol. 1: 1600–1800.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael (ed.). Hermann Conring (1606–1681). Beiträge zu Leben und Werk. Berlin, 1983.Google Scholar

Tierney, Brian. Liberty and Law. The Idea of Permissive Natural Law 1000–1800. Washington, DC, 2014.Google Scholar

Toyoda, Tetsuya. Theory and Politics of the Law of Nations: Political Bias in International Law Discourse of Seven German Court Councilors in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Leiden, 2011.Google Scholar

Treitschke, Heinrich von. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf I’, Preußische Jahrbücher, 35 (1875): 614–55.Google Scholar

Treitschke, Heinrich von. ‘Samuel von Pufendorf II’, Preußische Jahrbücher, 36 (1876): 61–109.Google Scholar

Treitschke, Heinrich von. Deutsche Geschichte im neunzehnten Jahrhundert, 5 vols. Leipzig, 1879–94.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar

Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries. Cambridge, 1980.Google Scholar

Varella, Laura Beck. ‘Between Rome and Azcapotzalco: Catholic readings of Heineccius’s Elementa iuris naturae et gentium’, in Love as the Principle of Natural Law. The Natural Law of Johann Gottlieb Heineccius and Its Contexts, ed. Grunert, Frank and Haakonssen, Knud. Leiden, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Vogel, Ursula. ‘Political philosophers and the trouble with polygamy: patriarchal reasoning in modern natural law’, History of Political Thought, 12 (1991): 229–51.Google Scholar

Vogel, Ursula. ‘Private contract and public institution: the peculiar case of marriage’, in Public and Private: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives, ed. Passerin d’Entrèves, Maurizio and Vogel, Ursula. London, 2000, 177–99.Google Scholar

Waldmann, Felix. ‘Natural law and the chair of ethics in the University of Naples, 1703–1769’, Modern Intellectual History, 19 (2022): 54–80.Google Scholar

Wall, Heinrich de. Die Staatslehre Johann Friedrich Horns. Aalen, 1992.Google Scholar

Warmholtz, Carl Gustav. Bibliotheca Historica Sveo-Gothica, vol. 9: Rikets Historia under K. K. Carl Gustaf, och Carl XI. Uppsala, 1803.Google Scholar

Welzel, Hans. Die Naturrechtslehre Samuel Pufendorfs: Ein Beitrag zur Ideengeschichte des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin, 1958.Google Scholar

Whaley, Joachim. ‘Hier existiert noch das alte heilige deutsche Reich: the legacy of the Holy Roman Empire and the unity of Germany’, Publications of the English Goethe Society, 83 (2014): 1–21.Google Scholar

Whaley, Joachim. ‘The old Reich in modern memory: recent controversies concerning the “relevance” of early modern German history’, in German History, Literature and the Nation, ed. Midgley, David and Emden, Christian. Oxford, 2004, 25–49.Google Scholar

Whaley, Joachim. Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, 2 vols. Oxford, 2012. Volume I: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia 1493–1648. Volume II: The Peace of Westphalia to the Dissolution of the Reich 1648–1806.Google Scholar

Whitman, James Q. The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era. Princeton, NJ, 1990.Google Scholar

Whitman, James Q.. The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War. Cambridge, MA, 2012.Google Scholar

Willoweit, Dietmar. ‘Hermann Conring’, in Staatsdenker im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Reichspublizistik – Politik – Naturrecht, ed. Stolleis, Michael. Frankfurt am Main, 1987, 129–47.Google Scholar

Wilson, Peter. ‘Still a monstrosity? Some reflections on early modern German statehood’, The Historical Journal, 49 (2006): 565–76.Google Scholar

Witt, Christian. Protestanten. Das Werden eines Integrationsbegriffs in der Frühen Neuzeit. Tübingen, 2011.Google Scholar

Witte, John Jr. Church, State, and Family: Reconciling Traditional Teachings and Modern Liberties. Cambridge, 2019.Google Scholar

Witte, John. The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy. Cambridge, 2015.Google Scholar

Wokler, Robert. ‘Rousseau’s Pufendorf: natural law and the foundations of commercial society’, History of Political Thought, 15 (1994): 373–402.Google Scholar

Wyduckel, Dieter. ‘Die Vertragslehre Pufendorfs und ihre rechts- und staatstheoretischen Grundlagen’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung. Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 147–65.Google Scholar

Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘Dignity and equality in Pufendorf’s natural law theory’, in Philosophy, Rights and Natural Law: Essays in Honour of Knud Haakonssen, ed. Hunter, Ian and Whatmore, Richard. Edinburgh, 2019, 147–68.Google Scholar

Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘Gewissensfreiheit und Toleranz: Zur Pufendorf-Rezeption bei Christian Thomasius’, in Samuel Pufendorf und die europäische Frühaufklärung: Werk und Einfluß eines deutschen Bürgers der Gelehrtenrepublik nach 300 Jahren (1694–1994), ed. Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald. Berlin, 1996, 169–80.Google Scholar

Zurbuchen, Simone. ‘The state of nature, the family, and the state’, in The State of Nature: Histories of an Idea, ed. Peters, Anne and Somos, Mark. Leiden, 2021, 216–45.Google Scholar