Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:36:37.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - What is the “social” in social practice?: comparing experiments in performance

from Part II - Body politics: the individual in history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2009

Tracy C. Davis
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

““In my innermost heart I am a Minimalist with a guilt complex.” - Santiago Sierra / “Touchable Stories began in 1996 with the idea of using the talents of contemporary artists to help individual communities define their own voice and give it public expression.”” - Shannon Flattery, Touchable Stories website (italics in original) / The above quotations come from two artists whose work differs enormously, yet both artists' work has been called “social practice.” As I noted recently in the “Lexicon” special issue of Performance Research, social practice is a term that has allegiances with a number of movements in experimental art and performance studies. Those allegiances bring to mind other terms that share some kinship with social practice: activist art, social work, protest performance, performance ethnography, community art, relational aesthetics, conversation pieces, action research, and other terms that signal a social turn in art practice aswell as the representational dimension of social and political formations. However, “social practice” is also embedded in a longer history of terms that have not always enjoyed triumphant celebration in the history of aesthetics: literal art, functionalist art, dumbed-down art, social realist art, victim art, consumable art, and related terms that have been coined to lament the capitulations to accessibility and intelligibility that can occur when art practice and social practice - aesthetics and politics - combine. How should we come to terms with this difference? Do the barometers for assessing aesthetic innovation differ so enormously from those that assess social innovation?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×