Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Practical Reason, Normativity and Ethics
- 6 Natural Law, Basic Goods and Practical Reason
- 7 Practical Reason in the Context of Law
- 8 Hume, Virtue and Natural Law
- 9 Natural Law Reasoning in Applied Ethics
- Part III Law
- Index
- References
6 - Natural Law, Basic Goods and Practical Reason
from Part II - Practical Reason, Normativity and Ethics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Practical Reason, Normativity and Ethics
- 6 Natural Law, Basic Goods and Practical Reason
- 7 Practical Reason in the Context of Law
- 8 Hume, Virtue and Natural Law
- 9 Natural Law Reasoning in Applied Ethics
- Part III Law
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence , pp. 133 - 158Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited
Bowlin, J. 1999. Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas’s Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J.M., Grisez, G. and Tollefsen, C. 1976. Free Choice: A Self-Referential Argument. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J.M. 2002. ‘Free Choice, Incomparably Valuable Options and Incommensurable Categories of Good’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 47: 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J.M. 2005. ‘Free Choice, Incommensurable Goods, and the Self-Refutation of Determinism’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 50: 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J.M. 2013. ‘On the Most Fundamental Principle of Morality’. In eds. Keown, J. and George, R.P., Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brock, S.L. 2015. ‘Practical Truth and its First Principles in the Theory of Grisez, Boyle, and Finnis’. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15: 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J., Boyle, J.M. and Grisez, G. 1987. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. Natural Law and Natural Rights revised edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011b. Collected Essays Volume I: Reason in Action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011c. Collected Essays Volume IV: Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2015. ‘Grounding Human Rights in Natural Law’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 60: 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. 1972. ‘Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives’. Philosophical Review 81: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. and Tollefsen, C. 2013. ‘Natural Law’. In ed. LaFollette, H., The International Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Girgis, S. 2016. ‘Subjectivity Without Subjectivism: Revisiting the Is/Ought Gap’, in eds. Snell, R.J. and McGuire, S.F., Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1965. ‘The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1–2, Question 94, Article 2’. Natural Law Forum 10: 168–201.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1983. The Way of the Lord Jesus, Volume I, Christian Moral Principles. Franciscan Herald Press.Google Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J. and Finnis, J. 1987. ‘Practical Principles, Moral Truth and Ultimate Ends’, American Journal of Jurisprudence 32: 99–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J., Finnis, J. and May, W.E. 1988. ‘“Every Marital Act Ought To Be Open to New Life”: Toward a Clearer Understanding’. The Thomist, 52: 365–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. 2001. ‘Natural Law, God, Religion, and Human Fulfillment’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 46: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. 2008. ‘The True Ultimate End of Human Beings: The Kingdom, Not God Alone’. Theological Studies 69: 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, G. Unpublished. ‘Sketch of a Complete, Systematic, Philosophical Ethics’.Google Scholar
Hittinger, R. 1987. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1985. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. By Beck, L.W.. Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 2002. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Aquinas, Thomas. 1964. Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by Litzinger, C.I.. Henry Regnery Co.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, C. 2015. ‘Suffering, Enhancement, and Human Goods’. Quaestiones Disputatae 5: 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, C. 2016. ‘First and Third Person Standpoints in the New Natural Law Theory’, in eds. Snell, R.J. and McGuire, S.F., Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern. Lexington Books: 95–114.Google Scholar
Veatch, H. 1990. ‘Natural Law and the ‘Is-Ought’ Question: Queries to Finnis and Grisez’, in Swimming Against the Current in Contemporary Philosophy. Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by