Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Hawthorne’s Labors In Concord
- 2 Hawthorne as cultural theorist
- 3 Hawthorne and American masculinity
- 4 Hawthorne and the question of women
- 5 Hawthorne, modernity, and the literary sketch
- 6 Hawthorne’s American history
- 7 Hawthorne and the writing of childhood
- 8 Love and politics, sympathy and justice in The Scarlet Letter
- 9 The marvelous queer interiors of The House of the Seven Gables
- 10 Sympathy and reform in The Blithedale Romance
- 11 Perplexity, sympathy, and the question of the human: a reading of The Marble Faun
- 12 Whose Hawthorne?
- Selected bibliography
- Index
- Series list
11 - Perplexity, sympathy, and the question of the human: a reading of The Marble Faun
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2006
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Hawthorne’s Labors In Concord
- 2 Hawthorne as cultural theorist
- 3 Hawthorne and American masculinity
- 4 Hawthorne and the question of women
- 5 Hawthorne, modernity, and the literary sketch
- 6 Hawthorne’s American history
- 7 Hawthorne and the writing of childhood
- 8 Love and politics, sympathy and justice in The Scarlet Letter
- 9 The marvelous queer interiors of The House of the Seven Gables
- 10 Sympathy and reform in The Blithedale Romance
- 11 Perplexity, sympathy, and the question of the human: a reading of The Marble Faun
- 12 Whose Hawthorne?
- Selected bibliography
- Index
- Series list
Summary
By almost all accounts, The Marble Faun is the most obscure of Hawthorne's four full-length romances. Not only does it break stride with the other long romances and most of the short fiction by being set outside the United States ( “Rappaccini's Daughter,” the notable exception, is also set in Italy), but it seems even to violate Hawthorne's own carefully specified definition of romance fiction. This is the definition put forth in the preface to The House of the Seven Gables, in which Hawthorne establishes the basic features of what becomes an influential, perhaps definitive American genre:
When a writer calls his work a Romance, it need hardly be observed that he wishes to claim a certain latitude, both as to its fashion and material, which he would not have felt himself entitled to assume, had he professed to be writing a Novel. The latter form of composition is presumed to aim at a very minute fidelity, not merely to the possible, but to the probable and ordinary course of man's experience. The former - while, as a work of art, it must rigidly subject itself to laws, and while it sins unpardonably, so far as it may swerve aside from the truth of the human heart - has fairly a right to present that truth under circumstances, to a great extent, of the writer's own choosing or creation . . . He will be wise, no doubt, to make a very moderate use of the privileges here stated, and, especially, to mingle the Marvellous rather as a slight, delicate, and evanescent flavor, than as any portion of the actual substance of the dish offered to the Public. He can hardly be said, however, to commit a literary crime, even if he disregard this caution.
(ii: 1)- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Nathaniel Hawthorne , pp. 230 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
- 5
- Cited by