Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: the theology of liberation
- Part I Contemporary Liberation Theology
- Part II Aspects of Liberation Theology
- Part III Analysis and Criticism
- 10 Liberation theology and the Roman Catholic Church
- 11 Marxism, liberation theology and the way of negation
- 12 The economics of liberation theology
- 13 Political theology, tradition and modernity
- 14 Globalising liberation theology: the American context, and coda
- Epilogue: the future of liberation theology
- Select bibliography
- Index
- Series list
11 - Marxism,liberation theology and the way of negation
from Part III - Analysis and Criticism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2008
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: the theology of liberation
- Part I Contemporary Liberation Theology
- Part II Aspects of Liberation Theology
- Part III Analysis and Criticism
- 10 Liberation theology and the Roman Catholic Church
- 11 Marxism, liberation theology and the way of negation
- 12 The economics of liberation theology
- 13 Political theology, tradition and modernity
- 14 Globalising liberation theology: the American context, and coda
- Epilogue: the future of liberation theology
- Select bibliography
- Index
- Series list
Summary
In 1984 the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith publishedan Instruction on Certain Aspects of the 'Theology ofLiberation', known from the first two words of its Latin text as Libertatis Nuntius. The intention of this document was, itsays, 'limited and precise', which was
to draw the attention of pastors, theologians, and all the faithful to the deviations, and risks of deviation, damaging to the faith and Christian living, that are brought about by certain forms of liberation theology which use, in an insufficiently critical manner, concepts borrowed from various currents of marxist thought.
The issue, then, was Marxism, or the use of it within some versions of liberationtheology. The document is careful to point out that it offers no general criticismof liberation theology as such, at any rate insofar as liberation theology isdefined by its response to the 'preferential option for the poor'; nor, it adds,should its criticisms of liberation theology on the score of its Marxism 'serve asan excuse for those who maintain an attitude of neutrality and indifference in theface of the tragic and pressing problems of human misery and injustice'. TheApostolic See, it goes on, has a good record of denunciation, for it 'has notceased to denounce the scandal involved in the gigantic arms race', nor does itany longer tolerate 'the shocking inequality between rich and poor' the injuriesof which to the poor, it notes, are aggravated by 'the memory of crimes of acertain type of colonialism'.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Liberation Theology , pp. 229 - 247Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
- 5
- Cited by