Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:01:25.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Reconstituting the universal: human rights as a regional idea

from Part III - Platforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

This chapter discusses the reconstitution of the universality of human rights as a regional idea that as a result becomes visible through the lens of regional treaty-based systems of human rights. There are four such initiatives: the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (European Convention), the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man 1948 (American Declaration) read together with the American Convention on Human Rights 1969 (ACHR, American Convention), and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights 1981 (African Charter). Although these regimes form the pinnacle of regional human rights law, they have crystallised into regional systems in which a corpus of specific human rights regimes have sprouted in relation to, for example, the prevention of torture, the protection of minorities, women, children, and economic, social and cultural rights, etc. Such treaty regimes are not the focus of this chapter although they should be acknowledged as belonging to respective regional systems of human rights.

We start our discussion of reconstituting the universal by examining the essential characteristics of universality, the reasons for reconstituting the universal and the place of universality as the flying buttress of regionalism. This discussion is then followed by an examination of human rights protection as a regional idea. Here we consider the reasons behind the establishment of regional regimes of human rights, the essence of regional human rights obligations in the context of universality, and the relative differences between regional human rights regimes. The chapter then examines regional human rights protection mechanisms, and the dynamics that lie behind the development of human rights law by the cross-fertilisation of human rights ideas across regional bodies of human rights. This development is seen as a reinforcement of universality. (The issue of relativism is not directly discussed as it falls outside the compass of the chapter albeit, as is to be expected, it emerges frequently as a point of importance when working through the content of the regional rights’ instruments that we will be discussing.)

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyani, C., ‘Recent Developments in the African Human Rights System 2004–2006’ (2007) 7 (3) Human Rights Law Review582–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighton Declaration on the European Court of Human Rights,
Chinedu Okafor, O., The African Human Rights System: Activist Forces and International Institutions (Cambridge University Press 2007)Google Scholar
Christoffersen, J. and Rask Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press 2011)CrossRef
Goldman, R. K.History and Action: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights’ (2009) 31 Human Rights Quarterly856–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasqualucci, J. M., The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. C. A. and Ovey, C., The European Convention on Human Rights, 5th edn (Oxford University Press: 2010)Google Scholar
Council of Europe, European Social Charter 1961 (rev. 1996)
Gearty, C., Essays on Human Rights and Terrorism (London: Cameron May 2008)Google Scholar
Ghai, Y., ‘Universalism and Relativism: Human Rights as a Framework for Negotiating Interethnic Claims’ (1999–2000) 21 Cardozo Law Review1096.Google Scholar
Rishmawi, M., ‘The Arab Charter on Human Rights and the League of Arab States: An Update’ (2010) 10 (1) Human Rights Law Review169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyani, C., ‘Toward a More Effective Guarantee of Women’s Rights in the African Human Rights System’, in Cook, R., Human Rights of Women (University of Pennsylvania Press 1994) 285–306.Google Scholar
Toonen v. Australia 1–3 Human Rights Reports (1994) 97
Sheffield and Horsham v. UK (1999) EHRR 163
Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania (2004) ECHR 395
Budayeva v. Russia (2008) ECHR 15339/02
Uner  v. Netherlands (2006) ECHR 340
D H and Others v. Czech Republic (2007) ECHR 57325/00

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×