Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations of European Criminal Law
- Part II Purposes and Principles
- Part III European Substantive Criminal Law
- Part IV European Criminal Procedure
- Part V Institutions
- Part VI Perspectives
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Part II - Purposes and Principles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations of European Criminal Law
- Part II Purposes and Principles
- Part III European Substantive Criminal Law
- Part IV European Criminal Procedure
- Part V Institutions
- Part VI Perspectives
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law , pp. 57 - 154Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Further Reading
Alston, P. and Weiler, J. H. H., ‘An “Ever Closer Union” in Need of a Human Rights Policy’ (1998) 9 EJIL, 658.Google Scholar
Bates, E., The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Búrca, G. de, ‘The Road not Taken: The European Union as a Global Human Rights Actor’ (2011) 105(4) AJIL, 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzethsiarou, K., Lock, T., Konstadinides, T., and O’Meara, N. (eds.), Human Rights Law in Europe: The Influence, Overlaps and Contradictions of the EU and ECHR, London: Routledge 2014.Google Scholar
Greer, S., Gerards, J., and Slowe, R., Human Rights in the Council of Europe and European Union – Achievements, Trends and Challenges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Lock, T., ‘Rights and Principles in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, (2019) 56(5) CMLR, 1201.Google Scholar
Mavronicola, N., Torture, Inhumanity and Degradation under Article 3 of the ECHR – Absolute Rights and Absolute Wrongs, Oxford: Hart 2021.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V., EU Criminal Law after Lisbon: Trust, Rights and the Transformation of Justice in Europe, Oxford: Hart 2016.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Ambos, K., ‘Comments on the Model Penal Code and European Criminal Law’, in Klip, A. (ed.), Substantive Criminal Law of the European Union, Antwerp: Maklu, 2011, pp. 227–232.Google Scholar
Klip, A., ‘European Integration and Harmonisation and Criminal Law’, in Curtin, D. M., Smits, J. M., Klip, A. and McCahery, J. A. (eds.), European Integration and Law, Antwerp: Intersentia, 2006, pp. 109–150.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V., ‘The Uneasy Relationship between the UK and the European Criminal Law: From Opt-Outs to Brexit’, (2016) 63 CLR, 517–536.Google Scholar
Vogel, J., ‘Why Is the Harmonisation of Penal Law Necessary? A Comment’, in Klip, A. and van der Wilt, H. (eds.), Harmonisation and Harmonising Measures in Criminal Law, Amsterdam: Koninklijke, 2002, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
Further reading
Herlin-Karnell, E., The Constitutional Dimension of European Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart, 2012.Google Scholar
Kettunen, M., Legitimizing European Criminal Law. Justification and Restrictions, Cham: Springer, 2020.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Ronsfeld, P., Rechtshilfe, Anerkennung und Vertrauen. Die Europäische Ermittlungsanordnung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2015.Google Scholar
Sztompka, P., Trust. A Sociological Theory, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität, 4th edn., Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius, 2000.Google Scholar