Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations of European Criminal Law
- Part II Purposes and Principles
- Part III European Substantive Criminal Law
- Part IV European Criminal Procedure
- Part V Institutions
- Part VI Perspectives
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Part III - European Substantive Criminal Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations of European Criminal Law
- Part II Purposes and Principles
- Part III European Substantive Criminal Law
- Part IV European Criminal Procedure
- Part V Institutions
- Part VI Perspectives
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law , pp. 155 - 228Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Further Reading
Asp, P., ‘(More Than) Two Decades Later – Does the Principle of Assimilation Still Have a Role to Play within European Criminal Law?’, in Freund, G. et al. (eds.), Grundlagen und Dogmatik des gesamten Strafrechtssystems – Festschrift für Wolfang Frisch zum 70. Geburtstag, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2013, pp. 1389–1401.Google Scholar
Bock, S., ‘Der Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der Union. Überlegungen zur Betrugsbekämpfungsrichtlinie 2017/1371’, in Ambos, K. and Bock, S. (eds.), Aktuelle und grundsätzliche Fragen des Wirtschaftsstrafrechts / Questions actuelle et fondamentales du droit pénal des affaires, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2019, pp. 155–180.Google Scholar
Covolo, V., L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau. Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015.Google Scholar
Fromm, I. E., Der strafrechtliche Schutz der Finanzinteressen der EG – Die Frage der Einführung einer supranationalen Strafrechtskompetenz durch Artikel 280 IV EGV, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
Gröblinghoff, S., Die Verpflichtung des deutschen Strafgesetzgebers zum Schutz der Interessen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1996.Google Scholar
Kaiafa-Gbandi, M., ‘The Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on the Fight against Fraud to the Union’s Financial Interests by Means of Criminal Law (COM (2012) 363 final) – An Assessment Based on the Manifesto for a European Criminal Policy’, (2012) 2 EuCLR, 319–337.Google Scholar
Pabsch, W. C., Der strafrechtliche Schutz der überstaatlichen Hoheitsgewalt, Bonn: Ludwig Röhrscheid Verlag, 1965.Google Scholar
Sunderland, J. et al., Study on the Legal Framework for the Protection EU Financial Interests by Criminal Law, 4 Mai 2012.Google Scholar
Weißer, B., ‘Strafgesetzgebung durch die Europäische Union: Nicht nur ein Recht, sondern auch eine Pflicht?’, (2014) 161 GA, 433–452.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Brière, C., ‘Transnational Responses to Trafficking in Human Beings in Europe: Models for More Inclusive Governance Mechanisms’, in Pereira, R., Engel, A. and Miettinen, S. (eds.), The Governance of Criminal Justice in the European Union, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020.Google Scholar
Guerra, J. E., ‘The Material Competence of the EPPO and the Concept of Inextricably Linked Offences’ (2021) eucrim, 49–50.Google Scholar
Herlin-Karnell, E., Conway, G., and Ganesh, A., European Union Law in Context London: Bloomsbury, 2021, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Jones, J. and Winterdyk, J., ’Human Trafficking: Challenges and Opportunities for the 21st Century. Outcomes and Proposals’, (2018) 8(1) Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 165–173.Google Scholar
Kaunert, C. and Léonard, S., ‘The Collective Securitisation of Terrorism in the European Union’, (2019) 42 West European Politics, 261–277.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. C., ‘Transnational Counter-Terrorism Law: Law, Power and Legitimacy in the “Wars on Terror”’, (2015) 6(1) Transnational Legal Theory, 31–54.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Ambos, K., ‘Is the Development of a Common Substantive Criminal Law for Europe Possible? Some Preliminary Reflections.’ (2005) 12 Maastricht J. Eur. Comp. L., 173–191.Google Scholar
Csonka, P., and Landwehr, O., ‘10 Years after Lisbon. How “lisbonised” Is the Substantive Criminal Law in the EU?’, (2019) eucrim, 261–267.Google Scholar
Kettunen, M., Legitimizing European Criminal Law: Justification and Restrictions, Cham: Springer, 2020.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V., EU Criminal Law after Lisbon: Rights, Trust and the Transformation of Justice in Europe, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V., Bergström, M., and Konstadinides, T. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016.Google Scholar
Öberg, J., Limits to EU Powers: A Case Study of EU Regulatory Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019.Google Scholar
Peers, S., EU Justice and Home Affairs Law: Volume II: EU Criminal Law, Policing, and Civil Law, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Peršak, N., ‘EU Criminal Law and Its Legitimation: In Search for a Substantive Principle of Criminalisation.’ (2018) 26 ECCL, 20–39.Google Scholar
Topa, I., ‘Where Do We Stand with Harmonization of Substantive Criminal Law in EU? Remarks on the Changes Introduced by the Lisbon Treaty.’ (2012) SJLS, 89–99.Google Scholar