Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:37:49.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Theoretical Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

Edited by
Roger Masterman  and
Robert Schütze
Roger Masterman
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Robert Schütze
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law , pp. 9 - 66
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Gardbaum, S., ‘How Do and Should We Compare Constitutional Law’, in Besson, Samantha et al. (eds.), Comparing Comparative Law (Schulthess, 2017), 109–126.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’ 2005 53 American Journal of Comparative Law 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R., ‘From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies’ 2013 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1–12.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R., Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Jackson, V.C., ‘Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law’ 2010 28 Penn State International Law Review 319–326.Google Scholar
Jackson, V.C., ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’, in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), 54–74.Google Scholar
Meuwese, A. and Versteeg, M., ‘Quantitative Methods for Comparative Constitutional Law’, in Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco (eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 230–256.Google Scholar
Reimann, M., ‘Comparative Law and Neighboring Disciplines’, in Bussani, Mauro and Mattei, Ugo (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 13–34.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K.L., ‘Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction’ 2004 38 Law & Society Review 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M., ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’ 1999 108 Yale Law Journal 1225–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

Albert, R., Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Casper, G., Constitutionalism (1987) University of Chicago Law Occasional Papers No. 22.Google Scholar
Cottier, T. and Hertig, M., ‘The Prospects of 21st Century Constitutionalism’ (2003) 7 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 261–328.Google Scholar
Gordon, S., Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today (Harvard University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, J.-E., Constitutionalism and Political Theory (Manchester University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., The Idea of Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
McIlwain, C.H., Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern (Liberty Fund, 2008).Google Scholar
Murkens, J.E.K., ‘The Quest for Constitutionalism in UK Public Law Discourse’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 427–455.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., ‘Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion’ (1962) 56 American Political Science Review 853–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, R., ‘Constitutionalism and the European Union’, in Barnard, C. and Peers, S. (eds.), European Union Law (Oxford University Press, 2017), 71–96.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×