Book contents
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion toComparative Constitutional Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases (Selection)
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Historical Experiences
- Part III Constitutional Principles
- Part IV State Institutions
- Part V Transnational Constitutionalism
- Index
- References
Part IV - State Institutions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2019
Book contents
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion toComparative Constitutional Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases (Selection)
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Foundations
- Part II Historical Experiences
- Part III Constitutional Principles
- Part IV State Institutions
- Part V Transnational Constitutionalism
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law , pp. 333 - 470Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Further Reading
McKay, W. and Johnson, C.W., Parliament and Congress: Representation and Scrutiny in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Oleszek, W.J., Oleszek, M.J., Rybicki, E.E. and Heniff, W.A., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process (CQ Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Russell, M., The Contemporary House of Lords: Westminster Bicameralism Revived (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Beyme, K. von, Parliamentary Democracy: Democratization, Destabilization, Reconsolidation (Palgrave Macmillan, 2000).Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W., Die Organisationsgewalt im Bereich der Regierung (Duncker & Humblot, 1964).Google Scholar
Craig, P. and Tomkins, A. (eds.), The Executive and Public Law: Power and Accountability in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Fombad, C. (ed.), Separation of Powers in African Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Gargarella, R., Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810–2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Helms, L., Presidents, Prime Ministers and Chancellors: Executive Leadership in Western Democracies (Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (eds.), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Comparative Constitutional Engineering, 2nd ed. (New York University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bignami, F. and Zaring, D. (eds.), Elgar Research Handbook on Comparative Law and Regulation (Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P. (eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P., and Emerson, B. (eds.), Comparative Administrative Law, 2nd ed. (Edward Elgar, 2017).Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S., Egidy, S. and Fowkes, J., Due Process of Lawmaking: The United States, South Africa, Germany and the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Fraenkel-Haeberle, C., Kropp, S., Palmero, F. and Sommermann, K.-P. (eds.), Citizen Participation in Multi-Level Democracies (Brill/Nijhoff, 2015).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Brewer-Carias, A.R., Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Chen, A.H.Y. and Maduro, M.P., ‘The Judiciary and Constitutional Review’ in Tushnet, M., Fleiner, T. and Saunders, C. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Daly, T., The Alchemists: Questioning our Faith in Courts as Democracy Builders (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Delledonne, G., ‘Relation of Constitutional Courts to Supreme Courts’, Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (2017) http://oxcon.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e571 (accessed 11 May 2018).Google Scholar
Kante, B., ‘Models of Constitutional Jurisdiction in Francophone West Africa’ (2008) 3(2) Journal of Comparative Law 158.Google Scholar
De Visser, M., Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Hart Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
Garlicki, L., ‘Constitutional Courts Versus Supreme Courts’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 44.Google Scholar
Saunders, C., ‘Constitutional Review in Asia: A Comparative Perspective’, in Chen, Albert HY and Harding, Andrew (eds.), Constitutional Courts in Asia (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Einzig, P., The Control of the Purse: Progress and Decline of Parliament’s Financial Control (Secker & Warburg, 1959).Google Scholar
Elster, J., Ulysees and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Joyce, P.G., The Congressional Budget Office – Honest Numbers, Power, and Policy Making (Georgetown University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Kopits, G. (ed.), Restoring Public Debt Sustainability: The Role of Independent Fiscal Institutions (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Tucker, P., Unelected Power: The Quest for Legitimacy in Central Banking and the Regulatory State (Princeton University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Webber, C. and Wildavsky, A., A History of Taxation and Expenditure in the Western World (Simon and Schuster, 1986).Google Scholar
Wehner, J., Legislatures and the Budget Process – The Myth of Fiscal Control (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar