Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:25:40.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - A New Commonwealth Constitutionalism?

from Part V - Transnational Constitutionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

Roger Masterman
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Robert Schütze
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

Until recently, standard accounts of the global constitutional landscape assigned the world’s constitutions to one of two dichotomous models for the constitutional protection of human rights: legislative supremacy or judicial supremacy. According to this binary taxonomy, the first model is characterized by the absence of any codified bill of rights and by the allocation of final authority on human rights questions to the legislative branch of the state. The second is characterized, to the contrary, by the presence of an entrenched and supreme law bill of rights, interpreted and enforced (including as against the legislature) by courts of some kind.1

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Gardbaum, S., The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Geiringer, C., ‘Moving Beyond the Constitutionalism/Democracy Dilemma: ‘Commonwealth Model’ Scholarship and the Fixation on Legislative Compliance’, in Elliott, M., Varuhas, J.N.E. and Stark, S.W. (eds.), The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Hart Publishing, 2018) 30.Google Scholar
Hiebert, J.L. and Kelly, J.B., Parliamentary Bills of Rights: The Experiences of New Zealand and the United Kingdom (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Hogg, P.W. and Bushell, A.A., ‘The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing After All)’ (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 75.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘What’s so Weak About ‘Weak-Form Review’? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1008.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘The Lure and Limits of Dialogue’ (2016) 66 University of Toronto Law Journal 83.Google Scholar
Roach, K., The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue (Irwin Law, revised ed, 2016).Google Scholar
Stephenson, S., From Dialogue to Disagreement in Comparative Rights Constitutionalism (Federation Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Tushnet, M., Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×