Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:10:54.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2023

Edited by
Luca Castagnoli  and
Paolo Fait
Luca Castagnoli
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Paolo Fait
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic , pp. 364 - 406
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Platonis Opera. 5 vols., ed. Burnet, J.. Oxford 1899–1907. [Edition]Google Scholar
Cooper, J.M. (1997) Plato. Complete Works. Indianapolis. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Opera. 5 vols., ed. by Bekker, I.. Berlin 1831–70. [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton. [English transl.; the translations of the works of the Organon are all included in vol. 1]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Organon Graece. 2 vols., ed. by Waitz, Th. Leipzig 1844–6. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford 1949. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Catégories, ed. and transl. by Bodéüs, R.. Paris 2001. [Edition and French transl.]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford 1949. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristoteles, De interpretatione, ed. by Weidemann, H.. Berlin and Boston 2014. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (2014) Aristoteles: Peri Hermeneias. 3rd ed. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1964. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1969) Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi. Naples. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Indianapolis. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Ebert, T. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch I. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malink, M. and Strobach, N. (2015) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch II. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2009) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics: Book 1. Oxford. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Paris. [French transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1964. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1975) L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Padua. [Italian comm. on the first book]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2007) Aristotele. Gli Analitici secondi. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles. Analytica Posteriora. Berlin. [German transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1958. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Topiques I–IV, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris 1967. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris 2007. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics Books I and VIII. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1958. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristote. Les Réfutations Sophistiques, ed. by Hecquet, M. Paris, 2019. [Edition, French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques. Paris and Laval. [French transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2013) ‘Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations: A Translation’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 13–54. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W., Huby, P.M., Sharples, R.W. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. 2 vols. Leiden and Boston. [Text, English transl. and comm.] (=FHS&G)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (1972) Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam. [Edition and German comm.]Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1983–90) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae. 4 vols. Naples. [Text and Italian comm.] (=SSR)Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1985) Les Mégariques. Fragments et témoignages. Paris. [French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, ed. by Von Arnim., J. 4 vols. Stuttgart 1903–24. [Edition] (=SVF)Google Scholar
Baldassarri, M. (1984–7) La logica stoica. Testimonianze e frammenti. 8 vols. Como. [Texts with Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (1987–8) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. 4 vols. Stuttgart. [Texts with German transl. and notes] (=FDS)Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. [Selection of texts with English transl. and comm.] (=L&S)Google Scholar
De Lacy, P.H. and De Lacy, E.A. (1985) On Methods of Inference (De signis). Naples. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Institutio Logica, ed. by Kalbfleisch, K.. Leipzig 1896. [Edition]Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.S. (1964) Galen’s Institutio Logica. Baltimore. [English transl., intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. and Morison, B. (forthcoming) Galen: Introduction to Logic. 2 vols. Oxford. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Galeni libellus de captionibus quae per dictionem fiunt, ed. by Gabler, K.. Rostock 1903. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) De Captionibus, in Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. 3 vols. Leiden: vol. 2: pp. 1–26. [Edition]Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity. Leiden. [Intr., text and transl.]Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2002) Galeno e le fallacie linguistiche. Il De captionibus in dictione. Venice. [Text with Italian transl. and notes]Google Scholar
Peri Hermeneias, in Apuleius, De Philosophia libri, ed. by Moreschini, C.. Stuttgart and Leipzig 1991. [Edition]Google Scholar
Londey, D. and Johanson, C. (1987) The Logic of Apuleius. Leiden and New York. [Intr., text, and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critical editions in the series Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (=CAG).Google Scholar
ACA indicates the English translations, with notes, in the series Ancient Commentators on Aristotle directed by R. Sorabji and M. Griffin and published by Duckworth and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Commentary on the First Book of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1883 (CAG II.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.8–13. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.14–22. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23–31. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32–46. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on the Eight Books of Aristotle’s Topics, ed. by Wallies, M. Berlin 1891 (CAG II.2). [Edition]Google Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J.M. (2000) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 1. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2020) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2021) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 3. [ACA]Google Scholar
Isagoge and Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, M. Berlin 1887 (CAG IV.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, ed. by Bodéüs, R. Paris 2008. [Edition with a French transl.]Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1992) Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) Porphyry. Introduction. Oxford. [English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin 1897 (CAG IV.5).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s First Book of the Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1899 (CAG IV.6).Google Scholar
Matthews, G. and Cohen, M. (1991) Ammonius. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1996) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin 1898 (CAG XIII.1).Google Scholar
Sirkel, R., Tweedale, M. and Harris, J. (2015) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 1–5. [ACA]Google Scholar
Share, M. (2019) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 6–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1905 (CAG XIII.2).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1909 (CAG XIII.3).Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2008) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.9–18. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. and Martijn, M. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.19–34. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (2009) Philoponus(?). On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Kalbfleisch, C, Berlin 1907 (CAG VIII).Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2003) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1–4. [ACA]Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and Fleet, B. (2001) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 5–6. [ACA]Google Scholar
Fleet, B. (2002) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 7–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (2000) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 9–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Manlii Severini Boetii opera omnia (Patrologia Latina 64), ed. by Migne, J.-P.. Paris 1847.Google Scholar
Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAS, ed. by Meiser, C. 2 vols. Leipzig 1877–80. [Edition of Boethius’ two commentaries on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2010) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–3. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2011) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 4–6. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA. Partial Translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Boethius. De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L. Brescia 1969. [Edition and Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1978) Boethius. De topicis differentiis. Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1988) Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica, Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Magee, J. (1998) Boethius. De divisione. Leiden and Boston. [Edition and English transl.]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. De syllogismo categorico. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Procli Diadochi In primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentaria, ed. by Friedlein, G. Leipzig 1873. [Edition]Google Scholar
Morrow, G. (1992) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton 1992. [English transl.]Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Platonis Opera. 5 vols., ed. Burnet, J.. Oxford 1899–1907. [Edition]Google Scholar
Cooper, J.M. (1997) Plato. Complete Works. Indianapolis. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Opera. 5 vols., ed. by Bekker, I.. Berlin 1831–70. [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton. [English transl.; the translations of the works of the Organon are all included in vol. 1]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Organon Graece. 2 vols., ed. by Waitz, Th. Leipzig 1844–6. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford 1949. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Catégories, ed. and transl. by Bodéüs, R.. Paris 2001. [Edition and French transl.]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford 1949. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristoteles, De interpretatione, ed. by Weidemann, H.. Berlin and Boston 2014. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (2014) Aristoteles: Peri Hermeneias. 3rd ed. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1964. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1969) Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi. Naples. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Indianapolis. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Ebert, T. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch I. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malink, M. and Strobach, N. (2015) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch II. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2009) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics: Book 1. Oxford. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Paris. [French transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1964. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1975) L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Padua. [Italian comm. on the first book]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2007) Aristotele. Gli Analitici secondi. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles. Analytica Posteriora. Berlin. [German transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1958. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Topiques I–IV, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris 1967. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris 2007. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics Books I and VIII. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1958. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristote. Les Réfutations Sophistiques, ed. by Hecquet, M. Paris, 2019. [Edition, French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques. Paris and Laval. [French transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2013) ‘Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations: A Translation’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 13–54. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Opera. 5 vols., ed. by Bekker, I.. Berlin 1831–70. [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton. [English transl.; the translations of the works of the Organon are all included in vol. 1]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Organon Graece. 2 vols., ed. by Waitz, Th. Leipzig 1844–6. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford 1949. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Catégories, ed. and transl. by Bodéüs, R.. Paris 2001. [Edition and French transl.]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford 1949. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristoteles, De interpretatione, ed. by Weidemann, H.. Berlin and Boston 2014. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (2014) Aristoteles: Peri Hermeneias. 3rd ed. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1964. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1969) Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi. Naples. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Indianapolis. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Ebert, T. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch I. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malink, M. and Strobach, N. (2015) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch II. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2009) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics: Book 1. Oxford. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Paris. [French transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1964. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1975) L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Padua. [Italian comm. on the first book]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2007) Aristotele. Gli Analitici secondi. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles. Analytica Posteriora. Berlin. [German transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1958. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Topiques I–IV, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris 1967. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris 2007. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics Books I and VIII. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford 1958. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristote. Les Réfutations Sophistiques, ed. by Hecquet, M. Paris, 2019. [Edition, French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques. Paris and Laval. [French transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2013) ‘Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations: A Translation’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 13–54. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W., Huby, P.M., Sharples, R.W. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. 2 vols. Leiden and Boston. [Text, English transl. and comm.] (=FHS&G)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (1972) Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam. [Edition and German comm.]Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1983–90) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae. 4 vols. Naples. [Text and Italian comm.] (=SSR)Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1985) Les Mégariques. Fragments et témoignages. Paris. [French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, ed. by Von Arnim., J. 4 vols. Stuttgart 1903–24. [Edition] (=SVF)Google Scholar
Baldassarri, M. (1984–7) La logica stoica. Testimonianze e frammenti. 8 vols. Como. [Texts with Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (1987–8) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. 4 vols. Stuttgart. [Texts with German transl. and notes] (=FDS)Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. [Selection of texts with English transl. and comm.] (=L&S)Google Scholar
De Lacy, P.H. and De Lacy, E.A. (1985) On Methods of Inference (De signis). Naples. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Institutio Logica, ed. by Kalbfleisch, K.. Leipzig 1896. [Edition]Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.S. (1964) Galen’s Institutio Logica. Baltimore. [English transl., intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. and Morison, B. (forthcoming) Galen: Introduction to Logic. 2 vols. Oxford. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Galeni libellus de captionibus quae per dictionem fiunt, ed. by Gabler, K.. Rostock 1903. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) De Captionibus, in Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. 3 vols. Leiden: vol. 2: pp. 1–26. [Edition]Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity. Leiden. [Intr., text and transl.]Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2002) Galeno e le fallacie linguistiche. Il De captionibus in dictione. Venice. [Text with Italian transl. and notes]Google Scholar
Institutio Logica, ed. by Kalbfleisch, K.. Leipzig 1896. [Edition]Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.S. (1964) Galen’s Institutio Logica. Baltimore. [English transl., intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. and Morison, B. (forthcoming) Galen: Introduction to Logic. 2 vols. Oxford. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Galeni libellus de captionibus quae per dictionem fiunt, ed. by Gabler, K.. Rostock 1903. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) De Captionibus, in Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. 3 vols. Leiden: vol. 2: pp. 1–26. [Edition]Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity. Leiden. [Intr., text and transl.]Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2002) Galeno e le fallacie linguistiche. Il De captionibus in dictione. Venice. [Text with Italian transl. and notes]Google Scholar
Peri Hermeneias, in Apuleius, De Philosophia libri, ed. by Moreschini, C.. Stuttgart and Leipzig 1991. [Edition]Google Scholar
Londey, D. and Johanson, C. (1987) The Logic of Apuleius. Leiden and New York. [Intr., text, and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critical editions in the series Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (=CAG).Google Scholar
ACA indicates the English translations, with notes, in the series Ancient Commentators on Aristotle directed by R. Sorabji and M. Griffin and published by Duckworth and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Commentary on the First Book of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1883 (CAG II.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.8–13. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.14–22. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23–31. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32–46. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on the Eight Books of Aristotle’s Topics, ed. by Wallies, M. Berlin 1891 (CAG II.2). [Edition]Google Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J.M. (2000) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 1. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2020) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2021) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 3. [ACA]Google Scholar
Isagoge and Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, M. Berlin 1887 (CAG IV.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, ed. by Bodéüs, R. Paris 2008. [Edition with a French transl.]Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1992) Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) Porphyry. Introduction. Oxford. [English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin 1897 (CAG IV.5).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s First Book of the Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1899 (CAG IV.6).Google Scholar
Matthews, G. and Cohen, M. (1991) Ammonius. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1996) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin 1898 (CAG XIII.1).Google Scholar
Sirkel, R., Tweedale, M. and Harris, J. (2015) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 1–5. [ACA]Google Scholar
Share, M. (2019) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 6–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1905 (CAG XIII.2).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1909 (CAG XIII.3).Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2008) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.9–18. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. and Martijn, M. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.19–34. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (2009) Philoponus(?). On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Kalbfleisch, C, Berlin 1907 (CAG VIII).Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2003) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1–4. [ACA]Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and Fleet, B. (2001) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 5–6. [ACA]Google Scholar
Fleet, B. (2002) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 7–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (2000) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 9–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Manlii Severini Boetii opera omnia (Patrologia Latina 64), ed. by Migne, J.-P.. Paris 1847.Google Scholar
Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAS, ed. by Meiser, C. 2 vols. Leipzig 1877–80. [Edition of Boethius’ two commentaries on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2010) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–3. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2011) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 4–6. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA. Partial Translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Boethius. De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L. Brescia 1969. [Edition and Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1978) Boethius. De topicis differentiis. Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1988) Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica, Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Magee, J. (1998) Boethius. De divisione. Leiden and Boston. [Edition and English transl.]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. De syllogismo categorico. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Procli Diadochi In primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentaria, ed. by Friedlein, G. Leipzig 1873. [Edition]Google Scholar
Morrow, G. (1992) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton 1992. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Commentary on the First Book of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1883 (CAG II.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.8–13. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.14–22. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23–31. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32–46. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on the Eight Books of Aristotle’s Topics, ed. by Wallies, M. Berlin 1891 (CAG II.2). [Edition]Google Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J.M. (2000) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 1. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2020) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2021) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 3. [ACA]Google Scholar
Isagoge and Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, M. Berlin 1887 (CAG IV.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, ed. by Bodéüs, R. Paris 2008. [Edition with a French transl.]Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1992) Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) Porphyry. Introduction. Oxford. [English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin 1897 (CAG IV.5).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s First Book of the Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1899 (CAG IV.6).Google Scholar
Matthews, G. and Cohen, M. (1991) Ammonius. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1996) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin 1898 (CAG XIII.1).Google Scholar
Sirkel, R., Tweedale, M. and Harris, J. (2015) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 1–5. [ACA]Google Scholar
Share, M. (2019) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 6–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1905 (CAG XIII.2).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin 1909 (CAG XIII.3).Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2008) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.9–18. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. and Martijn, M. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.19–34. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (2009) Philoponus(?). On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Kalbfleisch, C, Berlin 1907 (CAG VIII).Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2003) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1–4. [ACA]Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and Fleet, B. (2001) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 5–6. [ACA]Google Scholar
Fleet, B. (2002) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 7–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (2000) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 9–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Manlii Severini Boetii opera omnia (Patrologia Latina 64), ed. by Migne, J.-P.. Paris 1847.Google Scholar
Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAS, ed. by Meiser, C. 2 vols. Leipzig 1877–80. [Edition of Boethius’ two commentaries on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2010) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–3. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2011) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 4–6. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA. Partial Translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Boethius. De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L. Brescia 1969. [Edition and Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1978) Boethius. De topicis differentiis. Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1988) Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica, Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Magee, J. (1998) Boethius. De divisione. Leiden and Boston. [Edition and English transl.]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. De syllogismo categorico. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Procli Diadochi In primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentaria, ed. by Friedlein, G. Leipzig 1873. [Edition]Google Scholar
Morrow, G. (1992) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton 1992. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Abbo of Fleury, (1997) De syllogismis hypotheticis, ed. by Schupp, F.. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Abelard, P. (1970) Dialectica, ed. by de Rijk, L.M.. 2nd ed. Assen.Google Scholar
Abelard, P. (2010) Glossae super peri hermeneias, ed. by Jacobi, K. and Strub, C.. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F. (2003) ‘On the Shoulders of Hipparchus: A Reappraisal of Ancient Greek Combinatorics’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57: 465–502.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F. (2013) ‘Aristotle and Euclid’s Postulates’, Classical Quarterly 63: 680–5.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F. (2021) The Logical Syntax of Greek Mathematics. Berlin.Google Scholar
Achard, G. (1989) Rhétorique À Herennius. Paris.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J.L. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. (ed.) (2013) Interpreting Avicenna. Critical Essays. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. (2010) ‘The Principle of Bivalence in De Interpretatione 4’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 97–113.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. (2015) ‘Names, Verbs and Sentences in Ancient Greek Philosophy’, in Cameron, M and Stainton, R.J. (eds.) Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: 33–54.Google Scholar
Aho, T. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (2009) ‘Late Medieval Logic’, in Haaparanta 2009: 11–77.Google Scholar
al-Khūnajī, Afḍal al-Dīn (2010) Kashf al-asrār ʻan ghawāmiḍ al-afkār, ed. by el, K.-Rouyaheb, . Tehran and Berlin.Google Scholar
Alberti, A. (ed.) (1990) Logica, mente e persona. Studi sulla filosofia antica. Florence.Google Scholar
Alessandrelli, M. (2013) Il problema del λεκτόν nello stoicismo antico. Origine e statuto di una nozione controversa. Florence.Google Scholar
Algra, K.A., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (1995) ‘The Development of Aristotle’s Logic: Part of an Account in Outline’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11: 177–205.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2001) Inferences from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2007) ‘Rhetoric and Logic’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Malden, Oxford and Victoria: 350–64.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2011) ‘Syllogism, Demonstration, and Definition in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 63–90.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2014) ‘Aristotle on the Value of “Probability”, Persuasiveness, and Verisimilitude in Rhetorical Argument’, in Wohl, V (ed.) Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought. Cambridge: 47–64.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2019) ‘Megara and Dialectic’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou 2019: 17–46.Google Scholar
Alston, W.P. (1996) A Realist Conception of Truth. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Anderson, A.R. and Belnap, N.D. Jr. (1975) Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 1. New Haven.Google Scholar
Angioni, L. (2012) ‘Os, seis requisites das premissa daa demonstracão cientifica em Aristóteles (Segundos Aneliticos I 2)’, Manuscrito 35: 7–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angioni, L. and Zuppolini, B. (2019) ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration and Its Logical and Metaphysical Entanglements’, Manuscrito 42: i–ix.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (2000) Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism, transl. 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ariew, R. (2011) Descartes among the Scholastics. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (1974) Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (1978) ‘Multiple Quantification and the Use of Special Quantifiers in Early Sixteenth Century Logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19: 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (1985) ‘Editor’s Introduction’ to Sanderson, R., Logicae artis compendium. Bologna: ix–lv.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2008) ‘Developments in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries’, in Gabbay, D and Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: 609–43.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2010) ‘Terminist Logic’, in Pasnau, R and van Dyke, C. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: vol. I: 146–58.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2015) ‘Logic Teaching at the University of Oxford from the Sixteenth to the Early Eighteenth Century’, Noctua II 1–2: 24–62.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2016) ‘The Post-Medieval Period’, in Dutilh Novaes and Read 2016: 166–94.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca, NY and New York.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1996) ‘Epicurean Semiotics’, in Manetti, G (ed.) Knowledge Through Signs. Bologna: 155–86.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1988) ‘Hand Over Fist: The Failure of Stoic Rhetoric’, Classical Quarterly 38: 392–427.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1993) The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Auroux, S. (1993) La logique des idées. Montréal and Paris.Google Scholar
Ausland, H.W. (2012) ‘Socratic Induction in Plato and Aristotle’, in Fink 2012: 224–50.Google Scholar
Avicenna, (1973) The Propositional Logic of Avicenna, transl. with note and intr. by Shehaby, N.. Dordrecht and Boston.Google Scholar
Avicenna, (1984) Remarks and Admonitions. Part One: Logic, transl. by Inati, S.. Toronto.Google Scholar
Ayer, A.J. (1940) The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. New York.Google Scholar
Bailey, D.T.J. (2006) ‘Plato and Aristotle on the Unhypothetical’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 101–26.Google Scholar
Bailey, D.T.J. (2008) ‘Excavating Dissoi Logoi 4’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 249–64.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1969) ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration’, Phronesis 14: 123–52. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 7.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1970) ‘Property in Aristotle’s Topics’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52: 136–55. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 9.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1975) Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, transl. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1976) ‘Menaechmus and Circular Proof’, Classical Quarterly 27: 278–92. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 9.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1980) ‘Proof Destroyed’, in Schofield, Burnyeat and Barnes 1980: 161–81. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 14.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1981) ‘Proof and the Syllogism’, in Berti 1981: 17–59. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982) ‘Medicine, Experience and Logic’, in Barnes, Brunschwig, Burnyeat and Schofield 1982: 24–68. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 20.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1983) ‘Terms and Sentences: Theophrastus on Hypothetical Syllogisms’, Proceedings of the British Academy 69: 279–326. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 15.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1985), ‘Theophrastus and Hypothetical Syllogistic’, in Wiesener, W. (ed.) Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung. Berlin: 557–76. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 14.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988) ‘Epicurean Signs’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, s.v.: 91–134. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 13.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990) ‘Logical Form and Logical Matter’, in Alberti, A. (ed.) Logica, mente e persona. Florence: 7–119. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 3]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993a) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993b) ‘Meaning, Saying and Thinking’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 47–61. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 21.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993c) ‘A Big, Big D?’, Classical Review 63: 304–6.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993d) ‘“A Third Sort of Syllogism”: Galen and the Logic of Relations’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.) Modern Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers. London: 172–94.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996a) ‘Grammar on Aristotle’s Terms’, in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: 175–302. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 4.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996b) ‘The Catalogue of Chrysippus’ Logical Works’, in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D. T. (eds.) Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy. Leiden, New York and Cologne: 169–84.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997a) Logic and the Imperial Stoa. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997b) ‘Logic in Academica I and the Lucullus’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.) Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden, New York and Cologne: 140–60. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 2.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997c) ‘Proof and the Syllogistic Figures’, in Günther, H.-C and Rengakos, A. (eds.) Beiträge zur antike Philosophie: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann. Stuttgart: 153–66.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997d) ‘Roman Aristotle’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.) Philosophia Togata II. Oxford: 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1999) ‘Aristotle and Stoic Logic’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: 23–53. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 13.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (2005a) ‘Les catégories et les Catégories’, in Bruun, O. and Corti, L. (eds.) Les Catégories et leur histoire. Paris: 11–80. [Repr. in English in Barnes 2012a: ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2005b) ‘What Is a Disjunction?’, in Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.) Language and Learning. Cambridge: 274–98. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 19.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2007) Truth, Etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2010) ‘Review of Charles H. Kahn, Essays on Being (2009)’, Mind 119: 811–14.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2012a) Logical Matters. Essays in Ancient Philosophy II, ed. by Bonelli, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2012b) ‘Syllogistic and the Classification of Predicates’, in Barnes 2012a: 266‒83.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2014a) Proof, Knowledge, and Scepticism. Essays in Ancient Philosophy III, ed. by Bonelli, M., Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2014b) ‘Boethus and Finished Syllogisms’, in Lee, M. (ed.) Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic. Oxford: 175–98.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised English Translation. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1995) The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle Prior Analytics I.1–7, transl. London.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S. and Mignucci, M. (1999) ‘Logic’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 77–176.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M.F. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1982) Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Basso, P. (1999) Filosofia e geometria: Lambert interprete di Euclide. Florence.Google Scholar
Beaney, M. (1996) Frege: Making Sense. London.Google Scholar
Becker, A. (1933) Die Aristotelische Theorie der Möglichkeitsschlüsse. Berlin.Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1956) ‘Über den Κυριεύων λόγος des Diodoros Kronos’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie NS 29: 289–304Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1960) ‘Zur Rekonstruktion des Kyrieuon Logos des Diodoros Kronos. Mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Arbeiten von A.N. Prior’, in Derbolav, J. and Nicolin, F. (eds.) Erkenntnis und Verantwortung. Festschrift für Theodor Litt. Düsseldorf: 250–63.Google Scholar
Beere, J. (2019) ‘Faking Wisdom: The Expertise of Sophistic in Plato’s Sophist’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 57: 153–89.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2007) ‘Vertus dialectiques et défi sceptique: les stoïciens et les académiciens’, Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 22: 79–108.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.) (2019) Dialectic After Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beneke, F. (1842) System der Logik als Kunstlehre des Denkens I–I. Berlin.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (1989) ‘A Note on Eristic and the Socratic Elenchus’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 27: 591–9.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (2010) ‘Plato’s Philosophical Method in the Republic: The Divided Line (510b–511d)’, in McPherran, M.L. (ed.) Plato’s Republic: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: 188–208.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (2015) Clitophon’s Challenge: Dialectic in Plato’s Meno, Phaedo, and Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (ed.) (1981) Aristotle on Science: The ‘Posterior Analytics’. Padua.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (ed.) (2005) Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians, transl. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beziau, J.-Y. (2012) ‘A History of Truth-Values’, in Gabbay, D.M., Pelletier, F.J. and Woods, J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts. Volume 11 of Gabbay and Woods 2004–14: 235–307.Google Scholar
Bïard, J. (ed.) (2015) Raison et demonstration. Les commentaires médiévaux sur les Seconds analytiques. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bïard, J. and Mariani Zini, F. (eds.) (2009) Les lieux de l’argumentation: histoire du syllogisme topique d’Aristote à Leibniz. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bïard, J. and Rosier-Catach, I. (eds.) (2003) La tradition médiévale des catégories (XIIe–XVe siècles). Louvain-la Neuve, Leuven and Paris.Google Scholar
Black, D. (1990) Logic and Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne.Google Scholar
Blair, J.A. (2012) ‘Informal Logic and Logic’, in Blair, J.A (ed.) Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Dordrecht: 119–34.Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (eds.) (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9, with Boethius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 9, transl. London.Google Scholar
Bloch, D. (2012) John of Salisbury on Aristotelian Science. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Blum, P.R. (2012) Studies on Early Modern Aristotelianism. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1986) Die stoische Modallogik. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1993) ‘Chrysippus’ Modal Logic and Its Relation to Philo and Diodorus’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 63–84.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1996) ‘Stoic Syllogistic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14: 133–92.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1997) ‘The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments’, Phronesis 42: 299–312.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1999a) ‘Stoic Logic’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 92–157.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1999b) ‘Logic: The Megarics’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 83–92.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2000) ‘Wholly Hypothetical Syllogisms’, Phronesis 45: 87–137.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002a) ‘The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity: From Aristotle to 2nd Century AD’, Phronesis 47: 359–94.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002b) ‘Pre-Stoic Hypothetical Syllogistic in Galen’s Institutio Logica’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies s.v. 77: 57–72.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002c) ‘Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102: 217–38.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002d) ‘A Greek Parallel to Boethius’ De Hypotheticis Syllogismis’, Mnemosyne 55: 285–300.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2003) ‘Logic’, in Inwood 2003: 85–123.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2004) ‘Peripatetic Hypothetical Syllogistic in Galen – Propositional Logic off the Rails?’, Rhizai 2: 57–102.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2005) ‘The Stoics on Fallacies of Equivocation’, in Frede, D and Inwood, B. (eds.) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: 239–73.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2011) ‘The Combinatorics of Stoic Conjunction: Hipparchus Refuted, Chrysippus Vindicated’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 157–88.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2013) ‘How to Give Someone Horns’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 159–84.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2019) ‘Stoic Sequent Logic and Proof Theory’, History and Philosophy of Logic 40: 234–65.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2020a) ‘Ancient Logic’, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2020b) ‘Demonstration and the Indemonstrability of the Stoic Indemonstrables’, Phronesis 65: 355–78.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2021) ‘Frege Plagiarized the Stoics’, in Leigh, F (ed.) Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy. London: 149–206.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. and Shogry, S. (2020) ‘Stoic Logic and Multiple Generality’, Philosophers’ Imprint 20.Google Scholar
Bocheński, I.M. (1947) La logique de Théophraste. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Bocheński, I.M. (1951) Ancient Formal Logic. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bocheński, I.M. (1956) Formale Logik. Freiburg and Munich.Google Scholar
Boethius (1969) De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L.. Brescia.Google Scholar
Boger, G. (2004) ‘Aristotle’s Underlying Logic’, in Gabbay and Woods 2004: 101–46.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1990) ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic’, in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) Biologie, logique, et métaphysique chez Aristote. Paris: 185–236.Google Scholar
Bolzano, B. (1929) Wissenschaftslehre. 4 vols. 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bolzano, B. (2014) Theory of Science, transl. by George, R. and Rusnock, P.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bonevac, D. (2012) ‘A History of Quantification’, in Gabbay, D.M, Pelletier, F.J and Woods, J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts, vol. 11 of Gabbay and Woods 2004–14: 63–126.Google Scholar
Bonevac, D. and Dever, J. (2012) ‘A History of the Connectives’, in Gabbay, D.M., Pelletier, F.J. and Woods, J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts, vol. 11 of Gabbay and Woods 2004–14: 175–233.Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. (1985) The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bonomi, A. and Zucchi, A. (2001) Tempo e linguaggio. Introduzione alla semantica del tempo e dell’aspetto verbale. Milano.Google Scholar
Boole, G. (1847) The Mathematical Analysis of Logic: Being an Essay Towards a Calculus of Deductive Reasoning. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Boole, G. (1854) An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, On Which Are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boolos, G. (1994) ‘1879?’, in Hale, B. and Clark, P. (eds.) Reading Putnam. Oxford: 31–48.Google Scholar
Bos, H.J.M. (2001) Redefining Geometrical Exactness: Descartes’ Transformation. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botting, D. (2013) ‘What Is a Sophistical Refutation?’, Argumentation 26: 213–23.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. and Todd, R. (2004) Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy: A Translation of The Heavens. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bowen, A.C. (1983) ‘Menaechmus versus the Platonists: Two Theories of Science in the Early Academy’, Ancient Philosophy 3: 13–29.Google Scholar
Bown, A. (2016a) ‘Epicurus on Truth and Falsehood’, Phronesis 51: 463–503.Google Scholar
Bown, A. (2016b) ‘Epicurus on Bivalence and the Excluded Middle’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 98: 239–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G.R. (2018) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H.A.G. and Kneepkens, C.H. (eds.) (2003) Aristotle’s Peri Hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition. Groningen and Haren.Google Scholar
Brandis, C. (1835) ‘Über die Reihenfolge der Bücher des Aristotelischen Organons und ihre Griechischen Ausleger, nebst Beiträgen zur Geschichte des Textes jener Bücher des Aristoteles und ihrer Ausgaben’, in Historisch-Philologische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Jahr 1833). Berlin.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L. (1990) The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breger, H. (2008) ‘The Art of Mathematical Rationality’, in Dascal, M. (ed.) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York and London: 141–52.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. (2000), ‘Eine vollständige Formalisierung der aristotelischen Notwendigkeitssyllogistik’, in Öffenberger, N and Skarica, M. (eds.) Beiträge zum Satz vom Widerspruch und zur Aristotelischen Prädikationstheorie. Hildesheim: 333–56.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1924–5) Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt I–II, ed. by Kraus, O. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1956) Die Lehre vom richtigen Urteil, ed. by Mayer-Hillebrand, F.. Bern.Google Scholar
Broadie, A. (1985) The Circle of John Mair: Logic and Logicians in Pre-Reformation Scotland. Oxford.Google Scholar
Broadie, A. (1993) Introduction to Medieval Logic. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1993) ‘The Syriac Commentary Tradition’, in Burnett 1993: 3–15.Google Scholar
Bronowski, A. (2019) The Stoics on Lekta: All There Is to Say. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. (2012) ‘The Origin and Aim of Posterior Analytics II.19’, Phronesis 57: 29–62.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. (2016) Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (1994) ‘The Verb to Be in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Language. Cambridge: 211–36.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2008) ‘The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood’, in Fine, G. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford: 437–62.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2010) ‘Definition and Division in the Sophist’, in Charles, D. (ed.) Ancient Theories of Definition. Oxford: 151–71.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2018) ‘Rethinking Agreement in Plato’, in Brink, D.O., Sauvé Meyer, S. and Shields, C. (eds.) Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin. Oxford: 18–32.Google Scholar
Brundell, B. (1987) Pierre Gassendi. From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Brungs, A., Kapriev, G. and Mudroch, V. (eds.) (2019) Die Philosophie des Mittelalters I: Byzanz. Judentum. Basel.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1967) Aristote. Topiques I–IV, ed. and transl. Paris.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1969) ‘La proposition particulière et les preuves de non-concluance chez Aristote’, Cahiers pour l’Analyse 10: 3–26.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1980) ‘Proof Defined’, in Schofield, Burnyeat and Barnes 1980: 125–60.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘Sur le système des “prédicables” dans les Topiques d’Aristote’, in Energeia. Etudes aristotéliciennes offertes à Mgr Antonio Jannone, Paris: 145–57.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1989) ‘L’Organon, Tradition Grecque’, in Goulet, R. (ed.) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques. Paris: 482–502.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994) ‘Remarks on the Classification of Simple Propositions in Hellenistic Logics’, in Brunschwig, J, Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 57–71.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2007) Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, ed. and transl. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruun, O. and Corti, L. (eds.) (2005) Les Catégories et leur histoire. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruyère, N. (1984) Méthode et dialectique dans l’oeuvre de Pierre de La Ramée. Paris.Google Scholar
Bueno, A.A. (1988) ‘Aristotle, the Fallacy of Accident, and the Nature of Predication: A Historical Inquiry’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 26: 5–24.Google Scholar
Buickerood, J.G. (1985) ‘The Natural History of the Understanding: Locke and the Rise of Facultative Logic in the Eighteenth Century’, History and Philosophy of Logic 6: 157–90.Google Scholar
Buridan, J. (1976) Tractatus de consequentiis, ed. by Hubien, H.. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar
Burleigh, W. (1955) De puritate artis logicae. Tractatus longior. With a revised edition of the Tractatus Brevior, ed. by Boehner, P. St Bonaventure, Louvain and Paderborn.Google Scholar
Burnett, C. (ed.) (1993) Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions. London.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1981) ‘Aristotle on Understanding Knowledge’, in Berti 1981: 97–139. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 2, ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1982a) ‘Gods and Heaps’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.) Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: 315–38. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 5.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1982b) ‘The Origins of Non-deductive Inference’, in Barnes, Brunschwig, Burnyeat and Schofield 1982: 193–238. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1987) ‘Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion’, in Graeser, A. (ed.) Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Bern: 213–40. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 2, ch. 7.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1994) ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion’, in Furley, D.J. and Nehamas, A. (eds.) Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Philosophical Essays. Princeton: 3–55. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 7.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1996) ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Rationality of Rhetoric’, in Rorty, A.O. (ed.) Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 88–115.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1998) ‘Dissoi Logoi’, in Craig, E. (ed.) The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: vol. 3, 106–7. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 13.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (2002) ‘Plato on How Not to Speak of What Is Not: Euthydemus 283a–288a’, in Canto-Sperber and Pellegrin 2002: 40–66.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (2011) ‘Episteme’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.) Episteme, etc. Oxford: 3–29.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (2012) Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bury, R.G. (ed.) (1935) Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bydén, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (2012), ‘Greek Philosophy’, in Marenbon 2012: 29–57.Google Scholar
Calzolari, V. (2009) ‘David et la tradition arménienne’, in Calzolari and Barnes 2009 : 15–36.Google Scholar
Calzolari, V. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (2009) L’oeuvre de David l’Invincible et la transmission de la pensée grecque dans la tradition arménienne et syriaque. Commentaria in Aristotelem Armeniaca – Davidis opera 1, Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. and Marenbon, J. (eds.) (2010) Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500–1500: On Interpretation and Prior Analytics in two traditions = Vivarium 48, 1–2.Google Scholar
Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) (2002) Le style de la pensée. Paris.Google Scholar
Caplan, H. (1954) [Cicero]. Rhetorica Ad Herennium. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (1990) ‘Editor’s Introduction’ to Segner, J.A, Specimen logicae universaliter demonstratae. Bologna: xi–clxxii.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2002) Kant e la logica, vol. 1. Naples. [Reprint 2013.]Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2006) ‘Kant on Heuristics as a Desirable Addition to Logic’, in Cellucci, C. and Pecere, P. (eds.) Demonstrative and Non-Demonstrative Reasoning in Mathematics and Natural Science. Cassino: 123–81.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2011) ‘The Cognitive Importance of Sight and Hearing in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Logic’, in Cellucci, C., Grosholz, E. and Ippoliti, E. (eds.) Logic and Knowledge. Newcastle upon Tyne: 3–25.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2020) ‘Wahrscheinlichkeit and Scheinbarkeit. A Key Issue in Kant’s Logic and Philosophy’, in Schlüter, G. (ed.) Kants Philosophie in Übersetzungen = Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Sonderheft 15: 513–33.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. and Roncaglia, G. (2009) ‘Logic and Philosophy of Logic from Humanism to Kant’, in Haaparanta 2009: 78–158.Google Scholar
Casari, E. (1958) ‘Sulla disgiunzione nella logica megarico-stoica’, in Gruppo Italiano di Storia delle Scienze (eds.) Actes du VIIIe Congrès International d’Histoire des Sciences. Vinci and Paris: vol. 3, 1217–24.Google Scholar
Cassan, E. (2012) ‘The Status of Bacon in Gassendi’s Syntagma Philosophicum’, History of Logic Society and Politics 6: 80–9.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2009) ‘Sunartēsis crisippea e tesi di Aristotele’, in Alessandrelli, M. and Nasti De Vincentis, M (eds.) La logica nel pensiero antico. Naples: 105–63.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010a) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010b) ‘How Dialectical Was Stoic Dialectic?’, in Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. (eds.) Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality. Cambridge: 153–79.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2013) ‘Aristotle on Begging the Question: Between Dialectic, Logic and Epistemology’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 90–121.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2016) ‘Aristotle on the Non-Cause Fallacy’, History and Philosophy of Logic 37: 9–32.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2019) ‘Dialectic in the Hellenistic Academy’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou 2019: 168–217.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1985) ‘La negazione stoica’, in Cavini, W., Donnini Macciò, M.C., Funghi, M.S. and Manetti, D. (eds.) Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina. Florence: 47–126.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1989) ‘Modalità dialettiche nei Topici di Aristotele’, in Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica su Le teorie delle modalità. Bologna: 15–46.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1991) ‘Semantica fondamentale. Note sul § 44 di Essere e Tempo’, in Usberti, G. (ed.) Problemi Fondazionali nella teoria del significato. Florence: 35–48.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1993) ‘Chrysippus on Speaking Truly and the Liar’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 85–109.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1996) ‘“Essere ed essere vero”. Sull’uso assoluto di ΥΠΑΡΧΩ nella logica stoica’, in Funghi, M.S. (ed.) ΟΔΟΙ ΔΙΖΗΣΙΟΣ: Le vie della ricerca. Studies in honor of Francesco Adorno. Florence: 141–5.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1998) ‘Arguing from a Definition: Aristotle on Truth and the Excluded Middle’, in Avgelis, N and Peonidis, F. (eds.) Aristotle on Logic, Language, and Science. Thessaloniki: 3–15.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (2007) ‘Principia Contradictionis: Sui principi aristotelici della contraddizione (§§ 1–3)’, Antiquorum Philosophia 1: 123–69.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (2011) ‘Vero e falso nelle Categorie di Aristotele’, in Bonelli, M. and Masi, F.G. (eds.) Studi sulle Categorie di Aristotele. Amsterdam: 371–406.Google Scholar
Chance, T.A. (1992) Plato’s Euthydemus: Analysis of What Is and Is Not Philosophy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Charles, D. (ed.) (2010) Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Charles, D. and Peramatzis, M. (2016) ‘Aristotle on Truth-Bearers’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50: 101–41.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1944) Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, vol. 1. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Chiba, K. (2010) ‘Aristotle on Essence and Defining-Phrase in His Dialectic’, in Charles 2010: 203–51.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. (2007) ‘The Rhetoric to Alexander’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Malden, Oxford and Victoria: 90–106.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. (1989) Theory of Knowledge. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cogan, M. (1984) ‘Rodolphus Agricola and the Semantic Revolutions of the History of Invention’, Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 2: 163–94.Google Scholar
Cohen, S.M. (1971) ‘Socrates on the Definition of Piety: Euthyphro 10A–11B’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 9: 1–13.Google Scholar
Consigny, S.P. (2001) Gorgias. Sophist and Artist. Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1987) ‘Hypothetical Necessity and Natural Teleology’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J.G. (eds.) Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: 243–74.Google Scholar
Cope, E.M. (1867) An Introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric. London and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B.P. and Schmitt, C.B. (1992) A History of Western Philosophy: 3 Renaissance Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (1972) ‘Completeness of an Ancient Logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 37: 696–702.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (1974a) ‘Aristotle’s Natural Deduction System’, in Corcoran, J. (ed.) Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht and Boston: 85–131.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (1974b) ‘Remarks on Stoic Deduction’, in Corcoran, J. (ed.) Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht and Boston: 169–81.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (2009) ‘Aristotle’s Demonstrative Logic’, History and Philosophy of Logic 30: 1–20.Google Scholar
Corey, D.D. (2015) The Sophists in Plato’s Dialogues. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Cornford, F.M. (1935) Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. London.Google Scholar
Crager, A. (2015) ‘Meta-Logic in Aristotle’s Epistemology’. Doctoral thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Craig, M. (2013) ‘Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance’, in Akasoy, A. and Giglioni, G. (eds.) Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Dordrecht: 65–80.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (1994) ‘Indefinite Propositions and Anaphora in Stoic Logic’, Phronesis 39: 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2004) Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2010) ‘The Stoics on Definitions’, in Charles 2010: 359–423.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2011a) Plato’s Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2011b) ‘Aristotle on Syllogisms from a Hypothesis’, in Longo, A. (ed.) Argument from Hypothesis in Ancient Philosophy. Napoli: 95–184.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2012) ‘Aristotle’s Logic’, in Shields, C. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford and New York: 113–49.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2015) ‘Truth in Metaphysics Ε 4’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 167–225.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2019) ‘Dialectic in the Early Peripatos’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou 2019: 47–81.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2021) ‘The Sophist’s Appearance in Plato’s Sophist’, in Delcomminette, S. and Lachance, G. (eds.) L’éristique: Définitions, Caractérisations et Historicité. Bruxelles: 217–66.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (forthcoming) ‘Stoic Logic’, in Klein, J and Powers, N (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. and Charles, D. (2011) ‘ΠΡΟΤΑΣΙΣ in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics’, Phronesis 56: 193–203.Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques, transl. Paris.Google Scholar
Dancy, R.M. (1975) Sense and Contradiction: A Study in Aristotle. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Daston, L. (1988) Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, H. (2007) Locke, Language, and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, P. and De Lacy, E. (1978) Philodemus. On Methods of Inference, transl. and comm. 2nd ed. Naples.Google Scholar
De Morgan, A. (1926) Formal Logic, ed. by Taylor, A.E. London.Google Scholar
De Morgan, A. (1966) ‘On the Syllogism: IV and on the Logic of Relations’, in De Morgan, A., On the Syllogism and Other Logical Writings, ed. by Heath, P.. New Haven: 208–42.Google Scholar
de Pater, W.A. (1965) Les Topiques d’Aristote et la Dialectique Platonicienne. Fribourg.Google Scholar
De Quincey, T. (1893) Essays on Style, Rhetoric and Language, ed. by Scott, F.N. Boston: 145–6.Google Scholar
De Romilly, J. (1992) The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delcomminette, S. (2018) Aristote et la nécessité. Paris.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (1981) ‘Time and Modality in Diodorus Cronus’, Theoria 47: 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denyer, N. (1991) Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1964–76) Ouvres de Descartes, ed. by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris.Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1997) ‘Why All Animals Have a Stomach: Demonstration and Axiomatization in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.) Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Stuttgart: 63–84.Google Scholar
Devereux, D.T. (1992) ‘Inherence and Primary Substance in Aristotle’s Categories’, Ancient Philosophy 12: 113–31.Google Scholar
Di Lascio, E.V. (2004) ‘Third Men: The Logic of the Sophisms at Arist. SE 22, 178b36–170a10’, Topoi 23: 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Lascio, E.V. (2013) ‘The Theoretical Rationale Behind Aristotle’s Classification of Linguistic Fallacies in the Sophistical Refutations’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 55–89.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1964) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1993) Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism, transl. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Gergel, T. (2003) The Greek Sophists. London.Google Scholar
Dod, B.G. (1982) ‘Aristoteles latinus’, in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: 45–79.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1972) Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1989) ‘Gab es eine Dialektische Schule?’, Phronesis 34: 293–310.Google Scholar
Döring, K. and Ebert, Th. (eds.) (1993) Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläfer. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les réfutations sophistiques, transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Doyle, J.P. (2007) ‘Hispanic Scholastic Philosophy’, in Hankins, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: 250–69.Google Scholar
Drechsler, M. (2005) Interpretationen der Beweismethoden in der Syllogistik des Aristoteles. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1978) ‘Truth’, in Dummett, M., Truth and Other Enigmas. London: 1–24.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1981) Frege: Philosophy of Language. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1993) ‘What Is a Theory of Meaning? (II)’, in Dummett, M., The Seas of Language. Oxford: 34–93.Google Scholar
Duncombe, M. (2014) ‘Irreflexivity and Aristotle’s Syllogism’, Philosophical Quarterly 64: 434–52.Google Scholar
Durand, M. (2018) ‘Language and Reality: Stoic Semantics Reconstructed’. Doctoral thesis, Toronto.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, C. (2011) ‘The Different Ways in Which Logic Is (Said to Be) Formal’, History and Philosophy of Logic 32: 303–32.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, C. and Read, S. (eds.) (2016) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies. 3 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1990) ‘Philoponus, “Alexander” and the Origins of Medieval Logic’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. London: 445–61. [Repr. in Ebbesen 2008a: 157–70.]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1993) ‘Medieval Latin Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, in Burnett 1993: 129–73.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1996) ‘Greek and Latin Medieval Logic’, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin 66 : 67–95. [Repr. in Ebbesen 2008a: 137–56.]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2008a) Greek-Latin Philosophical Interaction. Collected Essays of Sten Ebbesen, vol. I. Aldershot and Vermont.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2008b) ‘Fragments of “Alexander’s” Commentaries on Analytica Posteriora and Sophistici Elenchi’, in Ebbesen 2008a: 187–201.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2009) ‘The Aristotelian Commentator’, in Marenbon, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge: 34–55.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2010) ‘The Prior Analytics in the Latin West: 12th–13th Centuries’, in Cameron and Marenbon 2010: 96–133.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2015) ‘The Posterior Analytics 1100–1400 in East and West’, in Bïard 2015: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1987) ‘The Origin of the Stoic Theory of Signs in Sextus Empiricus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 5: 83–126.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1991) Dialektiker und frühe Stoiker bei Sextus Empiricus: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der Aussagenlogik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1993) ‘Dialecticians and Stoics on Classifying Propositions’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 111–27.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1995) ‘Was ist ein vollkommener Syllogismus des Aristoteles?’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77: 221–47.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (2015) ‘What Is a Perfect Syllogism in Aristotle’s Syllogistic?’, Ancient Philosophy 35: 351–74.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles: Analytica Priora, Buch I, transl. and comm. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. (2015) ‘Why Are There No Conditionals in Aristotle’s Logic?’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 185–205.Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity: An English Translation of Galen’s De Captionibus (On Fallacies). Leiden.Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1967) ‘Zur stoischen Dialektik’. Doctoral thesis, Bern.Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1979) ‘The Stoic Concept of Anaphora’, in Bäuerle, R., Egli, U. and von Stechow, A. (eds.) Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: 266–83.Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1986) ‘Stoic Syntax and Semantics’, Historiographia Linguistica 13: 281–306.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. (1936) ‘On Certain Mathematical Terms in Aristotle’s Logic’, The American Journal of Philology 57: 33–54 (Part I); 151–72 (Part II).Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2010) Relational Syllogisms and the History of Arabic Logic, 900–1900. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2011) ‘Logic in the Arabic and Islamic World’, in Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: I, 686–92.Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2016) ‘Arabic Logic after Avicenna’, in Dutilh-Novaes and Read 2016: 45–93.Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2019) The Development of Arabic Logic (1200–1800). Basel.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1977) The Works of Yahyâ ibn cAdî. An Analytical Inventory. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1979) ‘More on Aristotelian Epagoge’, Phronesis 24: 301–19.Google Scholar
Engel, P. (1988) ‘Plenitude and Contingency: Modal Concepts in Nineteenth Century French Philosophy’, in Knuuttila 1988: 179–237.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G. (1996) Something to Reckon With: The Logic of Terms. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Erdmann, J.E. (1923) Logische Elementarlehre, ed. by Becher, E.. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Erismann, Ch. (2017) ‘Logic in Byzantium’, in Kaldellis, A. and Siniossoglou, N. (eds.) The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium. Cambridge: 362–80.Google Scholar
Eucken, C. (1983) Isokrates: Seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den Zeitgenössischen Philosophen. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (ed.) (1990) Epistemology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1990a) ‘Epicurus on the Truth of the Senses’, in Everson 1990: 161–83.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (1998) ‘Endoxa e consenso: per la distinzione dei due concetti in Aristotele’, Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 15: 15–48.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2004) ‘Aristotle on a Puzzle about Logical Consequence: Necessity of Being vs. Necessity of Saying’, Topoi 23: 101–12.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche, transl. and comm. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2008a) ‘Aristotele e paralogismi dell’identità’, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 63: 205–26.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2008b) Review of Barnes 2007, Rhizai 5: 345–53.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2013) ‘The “False Validating Premiss” in Aristotle’s Doctrine of Fallacies: An Interpretation of Sophistical Refutations 8’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 238–66.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2016) ‘Aristotle on the Demarcation of Dialectical and Sophistical Arguments’, Antiquorum Philosophia 10: 25–46.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2021) ‘Protagoras’ Attack on Wrestling and the Other Arts: The Cradle of Antilogic and Eristic’, in Delcomminette, S. and Lachance, G. (eds.) L’éristique: Définitions, Caractérisations et Historicité. Bruxelles: 47–80.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (forthcoming) ‘Misplaced Trust and Blind Reasoning: Aristotle on the Fallacy of Equivocation’.Google Scholar
Feingold, M. (2001) ‘English Ramism: A Reinterpretation’, in Feingold, M., Freedman, J.S. and Rother, W. (eds.) The Influence of Petrus Ramus. Basel: 127–76.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (1989) ‘Plato and Aristotle on Negative Predication and Semantic Fragmentation’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 71: 257–82.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (1991) The Origins of Aristotelian Science. New Haven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (2013) Formal Causes: Definition, Explanation, and Primacy in Socratic and Aristotelian Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (1990) ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII’, in Everson 1990: 85–115.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fine, K. (2011) ‘Aristotle’s Megarian Manoeuvres’, Mind 120: 993–1034.Google Scholar
Fink, J.L. (ed.) (2012) The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M.A. (2013) Meta-argumentation: An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory. London.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. (1995) Ways into the Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W. and Mirhady, D.C. (eds.) (1994) Peripatetic Rhetoric After Aristotle. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W., Huby, P.M., Sharples, R.W. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. 2 vols. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (2015) The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (2012) ‘The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are and What They Are Not’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 185–215.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1967) Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von ‘… ist …’ und ‘… ist nicht …’ im Sophistes. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1974a) Die stoische Logik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1974b) ‘Stoic vs. Aristotelian Syllogistic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophy 56: 1–32. [Repr. in Frede 1987a: 99–124.]Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987a) Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987b) ‘Individuals in Aristotle’, in Frede 1987a: 49–71.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994a) ‘The Stoic Notion of a Lekton’, in Everson, S (ed.) Language. Cambridge: 109–28.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994b) ‘The Stoic Notion of a Grammatical Case’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39: 13–24.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999) ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 295–322.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1919) ‘Negation’, in Geach, P.T. and Black, M. (eds.) (1960) Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: 117–35.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1964) Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze, ed. by Angelelli, I., Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1967) Begriffsschrift, a Formula Language Modeled Upon That of Arithmetic, for Pure Thought, in van Heijenoort 1967: 1–82.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1969) Nachgelassene Schriften, ed by. Hermes, H., Kambartel, F. and Kaulbach, F.. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (2013) Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Jena 1893/1903. Translated into English as Basic Laws of Arithmetic, ed. by Ebert, P.A. and Rossberg, M., with Wright, C.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gabbay, D.M. and Woods, J. (eds.) (2004) Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 1, Greek, Indian and Arabic Logic. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gabbay, D.M. and Woods, J. (eds.) (2004–14) Handbook of the History of Logic. 11 vols. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gabriel, G., Hülser, K. and Schlotter, S. (2009) ‘Zur Miete bei Frege – Rudolf Hirzel und die Rezeption der stoischen Logik und Semantik in Jena’, History and Philosophy of Logic 30: 369–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagarin, M. (2014) ‘Eikos Arguments in Athenian Forensic Oratory’, in Wohl, V. (ed.) Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Greek Thought. Cambridge: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganeri, J. (2004) ‘Indian Logic’, in Gabbay and Woods 2004: 309–95.Google Scholar
Garlandus, (1959) Dialectica, ed. by De Rijk, L.M. Assen.Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (1995) The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (1997) ‘The Stoics on Cases, Predicates and the Unity of the Proposition’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle and After. London: 91–108.Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (1999) ‘Tense Logic and the Master Argument’, in Meixner, U and Newen, A (eds.) Antike Philosophie / Ancient Philosophy. Mit einem Schwerpunkt zum Meisterargument / With a Focus on the Master Argument. Paderborn: 203–24.Google Scholar
Gassendi, P. (1964) Opera omnia (facsimile of the ed. Lyon 1658), ed. by Gregory, T.. 6 vols. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S.W. (1989) Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes’s Conception of Inference. Oxford.Google Scholar
Geach, P.T. (1966) ‘Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary’, Monist 50: 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P.T. (1968) ‘History of the Corruptions of Logic’, in Geach 1972: 44–61.Google Scholar
Geach, P.T. (1972) Logic Matters. Oxford.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1983–90) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae. 4 vols. Naples. (=SSR)Google Scholar
Gilbert, N.W. (1960) Renaissance Concepts of Method. New York.Google Scholar
Gili, L. (2011) La sillogistica di Alessandro di Afrodisia. Sillogistica assertoria e sillogistica modale nel commento agli Analitici Primi di Aristotele. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Gill, M.L. (2010) ‘Division and Definition in Plato’s Sophist and Statesman’, in Charles 2010: 172–99.Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (1996) Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 2.1–10. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (1978) ‘La classification stoïcienne des propositions simples selon Diogène Laërce VII 69–70’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.) Les Stoïciens et leur logique. Paris: 171–98.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2000) La dialectique des stoïciens. Paris.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2006) ‘L’histoire du principe de bivalence selon Łukasiewicz’, in Pouivet, R. and Rebuschi, M. (eds.) La philosophie en Pologne: 1919–1939. Paris: 37–66.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2013) ‘La postérité de la classification aristotélicienne des syllogismes aux IIe et IIIe s.: vers un Organon long?’, in Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (ed.) Ad notitiam ignoti: L’‘Organon’ dans la ‘translatio studiorum’ à l’époque d’Albert le Grand. Turnhout: 63–114.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2019) ‘Stoic Dialectic and Its Objects’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou 2019: 134–67.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. and Lemaire, J. (eds.) (2016) Logique et dialectique dans l’Antiquité. Paris.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. (1988) ‘The Availability of Ancient Works’, in Schmitt, C.B., Skinner, Q., Kessler, E. and Kraye, J. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: 767–91.Google Scholar
Grattan-Guinness, I. (1997) ‘Peirce between Logic and Mathematics’, in Houser, N., Roberts, D.D. and van Enra, J. (eds.) Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington, IN: 23–42.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, N. (1984) The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages. Munich.Google Scholar
Griffin, M.J. (2015) Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, W.M.A. (1980) Aristotle. Rhetoric I: A Commentary. New York.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, W.M.A. (1988) Aristotle. Rhetoric II: A Commentary. New York.Google Scholar
Grover, D. (1992) A Prosentential Theory of Truth. Princeton.Google Scholar
Grover, D.L., Camp, J.L. Jr and Belnap, N.D. Jr (1975) ‘A Prosentential Theory of Truth’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 27: 73–125.Google Scholar
Guerlac, R. (1979) Juan Luis Vives Against the Pseudodialecticians: A Humanist Attack on Medieval Logic. Dordrecht, Boston and London.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Günther, H.‑C. and Rengakos, A. (eds.) (1997) Beiträge zur Antiken Philosophie: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullman. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1993) ‘Aspects of Literary Form and Genre in Arabic Logical Works’, in Burnett 1993: 29–76.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1999) ‘The “Alexandria to Baghdad” Complex of Narratives. A Contribution to the Study of Philosophical and Medical Historiography Among the Arabs’, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 10: 155–93.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (2014) Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. 2nd ed. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Haaparanta, L. (1988) ‘Frege and His German Contemporaries on Alethic Modalities’, in Knuuttila 1988: 239–74.Google Scholar
Haaparanta, L. (2009a) ‘Introduction’, in Haaparanta 2009b: 3–10.Google Scholar
Haaparanta, L. (ed.) (2009b) The Development of Modern Logic. New York.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975) The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1982) ‘Die Einteilung der Philosophie im Altertum’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 36: 422–44.Google Scholar
Hallett, R. (2011) ‘Ramus, Printed Loci, and the Reinvention of Knowledge’, in Reid, S.J. and Wilson, E.A. (eds.) Ramus, Pedagogy, and the Liberal Arts: Ramism in Britain and the Wider World. Farnham: 89–112.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C.L. (1970) Fallacies. London.Google Scholar
Hambruch, E. (1904) Logische Regeln der platonischen Schule in der Aristotelischen Topik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D.W. (1976) ‘Aristotelian Epagoge’, Phronesis 21: 167–84.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R.J. (2003) ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in Inwood 2003: 59–84.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R.J. (2007) ‘Self-Refutation and the Sorites’, in Scott, D. (ed.) Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 351–73.Google Scholar
Hansen, H.V. and Pinto, R.C. (eds.) (1995) Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings. University Park.Google Scholar
Harbsmeier, Ch. (1998) Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 7, Part 1: Language and Logic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1970) ‘Induction: A Discussion of the Relevance of a Theory of Knowledge to the Theory of Induction’, in Swain, M. (ed.) Acceptance and Rational Belief. Dordrecht: 83–99.Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2009) ‘Logic and Linguistics: Aristotle’s Account of the Fallacies of Combination and Division in the Sophistical Refutations’, Apeiron 42: 105–52.Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2013) ‘The Ingredients of Aristotle’s Theory of Fallacy’, Argumentation 27: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, G. (1997) ‘The Workings of the Intellect: Mind and Psychology’, in Easton, P.A. (ed.) Logic and the Workings of the Mind: The Logic of Ideas and Faculty Psychology in Early Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, CA: 21–45.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2019) ‘Does Aristotle Distinguish between Common and Specific Topoi in the Rhetoric?’, Eirene 55: 179–97.Google Scholar
Hawtrey, R.S.W. (1981) Plato’s Euthydemus. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Hecquet-Devienne, M. (1993) ‘La pensée et le mot dans les Refutations Sophistiques’, Revue Philosophique 2: 179–96.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1923) Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Band: Die objective Logik, ed. by Lasson, G.. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Heindorf, L.F. (1810) Platonis Dialogi Selecti, ed. and comm., vol. 4. Berlin.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1892) Xenokrates. Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hermann, F.G. (1995) ‘Wrestling Metaphors in Plato’s Theaetetus’, Nikephoros 8: 77–109.Google Scholar
Hestir, B.E. (2016) Plato on the Metaphysical Foundation of Meaning and Truth. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hilpinen, R. (2009) ‘Appendix to Korte, Maunu and Aho 2009. Conditionals and Possible Worlds: On C.S. Peirce’s Conception of Conditionals and Modalities’, in Haaparanta 2009b: 551–61.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1973) Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1980) ‘C.S. Peirce’s “First Real Discovery” and Its Contemporary Relevance’, Monist 63: 304–15.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1987) ‘The Fallacy of Fallacies’, Argumentation 1: 211–38.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1997) ‘What Was Aristotle Doing in His Early Logic, Anyway? A Reply to Woods and Hansen’, Synthese 113: 241–9.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1879) ‘De logica Stoicorum’, in Amicorum Conlegarum Decas (eds.) Satura philologa Hermanno Sauppio. Berlin: 61–78.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, D. (2005) ‘The Peculiarities of Stoic Propositional Logic’, in Woods, J., Peacock, K.A. and Irvine, A.D. (eds.) Mistakes of Reason: Essays in Honour of John Woods. Toronto: 224–42.Google Scholar
Hodges, W. (2009) ‘Traditional Logic, Modern Logic and Natural Language’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 38: 589–606.Google Scholar
Hotson, H. (2000) Johann Heinrich Alsted 1588–1638: Between Renaissance, Reformation, and Universal Reform. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hotson, H. (2007) Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications 1543–1630. Oxford.Google Scholar
Howell, W.S. (1956) Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500–1700. Princeton.Google Scholar
Howell, W.S. (1971) Eighteenth Century British Logic and Rhetoric. Princeton.Google Scholar
Huby, P. (2007) Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Commentary. Volume 2: Logic. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Hudry, J.-L. (2013) ‘Aristotle on Deduction and Inferential Necessity’, The Review of Metaphysics 67: 29–54.Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (1993) ‘Remarques sur la tradition arabe de l’Organon d’après le manuscrit Paris, Bibliothèque nationale, ar. 2346’, in Burnett 1993: 19–28.Google Scholar
Hugonnard-Roche, H. (2004) La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque. Études sur la transmission des textes de l’Organon et leur interprétation philosophique. Paris.Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (1987–8) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. 4 vols. Stuttgart. (=FDS)Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (1993) ‘Zur dialektischen und stoischen Einteilung der Fehlschlüsse’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 167–85.Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (2012) ‘Pragmatics and the Idea of the Illocutionary in Stoic Language Theory’, in Edmondson, R. and Hülser, K. (eds.) Politics of Practical Reasoning: Integrating Action, Discourse and Argument. Lanham: 39–64Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (2021) Römische Jurisprudenz und stoische Logik: Drei Beispiele reflektierender Urteilskraft. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Husik, I. (1906) ‘Aristotle on the Law of Contradiction and the Basis of the Syllogism’, Mind 15: 215–22.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1900) Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Teil: Prolegomena zur reiner Logik. Halle.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1901) Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Halle.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1929) Formale und transzendentale Logik: Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Halle.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1939) Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik, ed. by Landgrebe, L.. Prague.Google Scholar
Ide, H.A. (1992) ‘Chrysippus’s Response to Diodorus’s Master Argument’, History and Philosophy of Logic 13: 133–48.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1990) ‘Analysis in Stoic Logic’. Doctoral thesis, London.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993a) ‘The Stoic Division of Philosophy’, Phronesis 38: 57–74.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993b) ‘The Stoic Indemonstrables in the Later Tradition’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 187–200.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2002) ‘Aristotle’s Use of Examples in the Prior Analytics’, Phronesis 47: 127–52.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2006) ‘Stoic Logic’, in Gill, M.L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: 505–29.Google Scholar
Innes, D.C. (1995) Demetrius. On Style. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Irwin, T.H. (1988) Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1995) ‘Plato’s Objections to the Sophists’, in Powell, C.A. (ed.) The Greek World. London: 568–90.Google Scholar
Isaac, J. (1953) Le Peri hermeneias en occident de Boèce à Saint Thomas. Paris.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. and Dorandi, T. (2012) Senocrate e Ermodoro: Testimonianze e frammenti. Edizione, traduzione e commento. Pisa.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. (1974) Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. (1982) ‘Humanism and the Teaching of Logic’, in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A and Pinborg, J. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: 797–807.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. (1988) ‘Humanistic Logic’, in Schmitt, C.B, Skinner, Q., Kessler, E. and Kraye, J. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: 173–98.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. (2004) ‘Aristotle’s Modal Syllogisms’, in Gabbay and Woods 2004: 247–307.Google Scholar
Johnson, R.H. (1996) The Rise of Informal Logic. Newport News, VA.Google Scholar
Jones, R.E. (2010) ‘Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 6–9’, Phronesis 55: 26–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joray, P. (2014) ‘The Principle of Contradiction and Ecthesis in Aristotle’s Syllogistic’, History and Philosophy of Logic 35: 219–36.Google Scholar
Judson, L. (1991) ‘Chance and “Always or For the Most Part” in Aristotle’, in Judson, L. (ed.) Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays. Oxford: 73–99.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1981) ‘The Role of Nous in the Cognition of First Principles in Posterior Analytics II 19’, in Berti 1981: 385–414.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1996) Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2003a) The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek. 2nd ed. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2003b) ‘On Platonic Chronology’, in Annas, J. and Rowe, C. (eds.) New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient. Cambridge, MA: ch. 4.Google Scholar
Kann, C. (2016) ‘Supposition and Properties of Terms’, in Dutilh Novaes and Read 2016: 220–44.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1929) Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Kant’s gesammelte Schriften III. Transl. by Kemp Smith, N.. London and Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1992) The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures, tr. Meerbote, in Walford, D. (ed.) I. Kant: Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Cambridge: 85–8.Google Scholar
Kapp, E. (1975) ‘Syllogistic’, in Barnes, J., Schofield, M., Sorabji, R. (eds.) Articles on Aristotle. 1. Science. London: 35–49. [Originally published as ‘Syllogistik’ in Pauly–Wissowa IV A [1931], cols. 1046–67.]Google Scholar
Kassel, R. (1976) Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. (1994) A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G.A. (2007) Aristotle. On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd ed. New York and Berlin.Google Scholar
Keyt, D. (1973) ‘Plato on Falsity: Sophist 263B’, in Lee, Mourelatos and Rorty 1973: 285–305.Google Scholar
Kilwardby, R. (2015) Notulae in libros priorum, ed. by Thom, P. and Scott, J.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kirk, G.S. (1962) Heraclitus. The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirwan, C. (1979) ‘Aristotle and the So-Called Fallacy of Equivocation’, Philosophical Quarterly 29: 35–46.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (1994) ‘Epicheirem’, in Ueding, G. and Barner, W. (eds.) Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, vol. 2. Tübingen: 1251–8.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. and Kneale, M. (1962) The Development of Logic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. and Kneale, M. (1972) ‘Prosleptic Propositions and Arguments’, in Stern, S.M., Habib Hourani, A. and Brown, V. (eds.) Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. Berlin: 189–207.Google Scholar
Knorr, W.R. (1986) The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. Boston.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (ed.) (1988) Modern Modalities: Studies of the History of Modal Theories from Medieval Nominalism to Logical Positivism. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Korte, T., Maunu, A., Aho, T. (2009) ‘Modal Logic from Kant to Possible World Semantics’, in Haaparanta 2009b: 516–50.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. (1994) ‘Enthymem’, in Ueding, G. and Barner, W. (eds.) Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, vol. 2. Tübingen: 1197–222.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. (2011) ‘How to Classify Means of Persuasion: The Rhetoric to Alexander and Aristotle on pisteis’, Rhetorica 29: 263–79.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P.O. (1988) ‘Humanism’, in Schmitt, C.B., Skinner, Q., Kessler, E. and Kraye, J. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: 113–38.Google Scholar
Kühn, C. (1819–33) Galeni Opera Omnia, 20 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Gerth, B. (1898) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. 3rd ed. Hannover.Google Scholar
Künne, W. (2003) Conceptions of Truth. Oxford.Google Scholar
Künne, W. (2008) Versuche über Bolzano/Essays on Bolzano. St. Augustin.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. and Manninen, J. (1988) ‘Hegel on Modalities and Monadology’, in Knuuttila 1988: 109–77.Google Scholar
Kusukawa, S. (1995) The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2000) Modal Syllogistics in the Middle Ages. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2008) ‘The Assimilation of Aristotelian and Arabic Logic up to the Later Thirteenth Century’, in Gabbay, D and Woods, J (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2, Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: 281–346.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. and Thom, P. (2013) A Companion to the Philosophy of Robert Kilwardby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lameer, J. (1994) Al-Fārābī and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Lapointe, S. (2014) ‘Bolzano’s Logical Realism’, in Rush, P. (ed.) The Metaphysics of Logic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (1980) Aristotle and Logical Theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lee, E.N., Mourelatos, A.P.D. and Rorty, R.M. (eds.) (1973) Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos. Assen.Google Scholar
Lee, T.-S. (1984) Die griechische Tradition der Aristotelischen Syllogistik in der Spätantike. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G.W. (1978) Die philosophischen Schriften. 7 vols., ed. by Gerhardt, C.I. Hildesheim and New York.Google Scholar
Lejewski, C. (1961) ‘On Prosleptic Syllogisms’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 11: 158–76.Google Scholar
Lejewski, C. (1976) ‘On Prosleptic Premisses’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17: 1–18.Google Scholar
Lennox, J.G. (1987) ‘Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J.G. (eds.) Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: 90–119.Google Scholar
Lenzen, W. (2004) Calculus Universalis. Studien zur Logik von G. W. Leibniz. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Lenzen, W. (2008) ‘Der “logische Calcul Herrn Prof. Ploucquets”’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90: 74–114.Google Scholar
Leszl, W. (2004) ‘Aristotle’s Logical Works and His Conception of Logic’, Topoi 23: 71–100.Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. (2010) Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1975) ‘Language and Languages’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: 3–35.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1991) Parts of Classes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lipps, Th. (1893) Grundzüge der Logik. Hamburg and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1979) Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1961) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. by Yolton, J.. London.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1975) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. by Nidditch, P.H.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lohr, C.H. (2000) ‘Renaissance Latin Translations of the Greek Commentaries on Aristotle’, in Kraye, J. and Stone, M.W.F. (eds.) Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy. New York: 24–40.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1971) ‘Language and Thought in Stoicism’, in Long, A.A., Problems in Stoicism. London: 75–113.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and D.N., Sedley (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. (=L&S)Google Scholar
Lotze, H. (1843) Logik. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1910) ‘Aristotle on the Law of Contradiction’, tr. J. Barnes, in Barnes, J., Schofield, M. and Sorabji, R. (eds.) (1979) Articles on Aristotle 3: Metaphysics. London: 50–62.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1935) ‘Zur Geschichte der Aussagenlogik’, Erkenntnis 5: 111–31. [Transl. by the author from his (1934) ‘Z historii logiki zdań’, Przegląd Filozoficzny 27: 417–37. English translation as (1967) ‘On the History of the Logic of Propositions’ by S. McCall in Polish Logic 1920–1939. Oxford: 66–87.]Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1951) Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic, Oxford.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1957) Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1970) ‘Two-Valued Logic’, in Borkowski, L (ed.) Łukasiewicz: Selected Works. Amsterdam and Warsaw: 89–109.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1963) Structural Semantics: An Analysis of Part of the Vocabulary of Plato. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacColl, S. (1963) Aristotle’s Modal Syllogisms. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. (2000) ‘What Does It Mean to Say That Logic Is Formal?’ Doctoral thesis, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Mack, P. (1993) Renaissance Argument. Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Mack, P. (2011) A History of Renaissance Rhetoric 1380–1620. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maier, H. (1896–1900) Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Maierù, A. (1972) Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica. Rome.Google Scholar
Maierù, A. (1993) ‘La dialettica’, in Cavallo, G., Leonardi, C. and Menestò, E. (eds.) Lo spazio letterario del medioevo latino, vol. 1, t. 2. Rome: 273–94.Google Scholar
Makin, S. (2006) Aristotle. Metaphysics, Book Θ. Oxford.Google Scholar
Malherbe, M. (1996) ‘Bacon’s Method of Science’, in Peltonen, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge: 75–98.Google Scholar
Malink, M. (2008) ‘tōi vs tōn in Prior Analytics 1.1-22’, Classical Quarterly 58: 519–26.Google Scholar
Malink, M. (2013) Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Malink, M. (2014) ‘Deduction in Sophistici Elenchi 6’, in Lee, M.-K. (ed.) Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology and Logic. Oxford: 149–74.Google Scholar
Malink, M. (2015) ‘The Beginning of Formal Logic: Deduction in Aristotle’s Topics vs. Prior Analytics’, Phronesis 60: 267–309.Google Scholar
Malink, M. (2016) ‘Aristotle on One-Sided Possibility’, in Cresswell, M., Mares, E. and Rini, A. (eds.) Logical Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The Story of Necessity. New York: 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malink, M. and Rosen, J. (2013) ‘Proof by Assumption of the Possible in Prior Analytics 1.15’, Mind 122: 953–86.Google Scholar
Malink, M. and Vasudevan, A. (2020) ‘The Peripatetic Program in Categorical Logic: Leibniz on Propositional Terms’, Review of Symbolic Logic 13: 141–205.Google Scholar
Mancosu, P., Jørgensen, K.F. and Pedersen, S.A. (2005) Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manekin, C. (1992) The Logic of Gersonides. Dordrecht and Boston.Google Scholar
Manekin, C. (2009) ‘Propositions and Propositional Inference’, in Nadler, S. and Rudavsky, T.M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy. From Antiquity Through the Seventeenth Century. New York: 167–87.Google Scholar
Mansion, A. (1961) ‘L’origine du syllogisme et la théorie de la science chez Aristote’, in Mansion, S. (ed.) Aristote et les problèmes de methode. Louvain-La-Neuve: 57–81.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2000) ‘Medieval Latin Commentaries and Glosses on Aristotelian Logical Texts, Before ca. 1150 A.D.’ [originally published in Burnett 1993: 77–127], along with Supplementary Working Catalogue, in Marenbon, J, Aristotelian Logic, Platonism, and the Context of Early Medieval Philosophy in the West. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2003) Boethius. New York.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2008) ‘The Latin Tradition of Logic to 1100’, in Gabbay, D.M. and Woods, J. (eds.) A Handbook of the History of Logic, II. Medieval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: 1–63.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2011) ‘Logic at the Turn of the Twelfth Century: A Synthesis’, in Rosier-Catach, I (ed.) Arts du langage et théologie aux confins des XIe–XIIe siècle. Textes, maîtres, débats. Turnhout: 181–217.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2013a) ‘La logique en occident latin (ca. 780 – ca. 1150): le programme des études et ses enjeux’, in Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (ed.) ‘Ad notitiam ignoti’. The Organon in the Translatio Studiorum at the Time of Albert the Great: Orders of Treatises, Divisions of Logic and Textual Transmissions. Turnhout: 173–91.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2013b) ‘Glosses and Commentaries on the Categories Before 1200: A Revised Working Catalogue’, in Ebbesen, S., Marenbon, J. and Thom, P. (eds.) Aristotle’s Categories in the Byzantine, Arabic and Latin Traditions. Copenhagen: 139–73.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (2018) ‘The Isagoge in the Latin Tradition until c. 1200’, Medioevo 43: 151–88.Google Scholar
Marenbon, J. (ed.) (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrone, L. (1997) ‘Le Questioni Logiche di Crisippo’, Cronache Ercolanesi 27: 83–100.Google Scholar
Martin, Ch. (1987) ‘Embarrassing Arguments and Surprising Conclusions in the Development of Theories of the Conditional in the Twelfth Century’, in Jolivet, J. and de Libera, A. (eds.) Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains. Naples: 377–400.Google Scholar
Martin, Ch. (1991) ‘Boethius and the Logic of Negation’, Phronesis 36: 277–304.Google Scholar
Martin, Ch. (2009) ‘The Development of Logic in the Twelfth Century’, in R. Pasnau (ed.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: I, 129–45.Google Scholar
Martin, Ch. (2010) ‘“They Had Added Not a Single Tiny Proposition.”: The Reception of the Prior Analytics in the First Half of the Twelfth Century’, in Cameron and Marenbon 2010: 159–92.Google Scholar
Martin, W.S. (2006) Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mates, B. (1961) Stoic Logic. 2nd ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mates, B. (1992) ‘Bolzano and Ancient Pyrrhonism’, in Bolzano’s Wissenschaftslehre 1837–1987. Florence: 121–39.Google Scholar
Mautner, T. (2005) Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
May, J. and Wisse, J. (2001) Cicero. On the Ideal Orator. New York.Google Scholar
McCabe, M.M. (1994) ‘Persistent Fallacies’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 94: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, M.M. (1999) ‘Silencing the Sophists: the Drama of the Euthydemus’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 14: 139–68.Google Scholar
McCall, S. (1966) ‘Connexive Implication’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 31: 415–33.Google Scholar
McCall, S. (1967) ‘Connexive Implication and the Syllogism’, Mind 76: 346–56.Google Scholar
McConica, J.K. (1979) ‘Humanism and Aristotle in Tudor Oxford’, English Historical Review 94: 291–317.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. (2008) Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. (2000) Logical Properties: Identity, Existence, Predication, Necessity, Truth. Oxford.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. Jr (1992) Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration. Princeton.Google Scholar
Medine, P.E. (1986) Thomas Wilson. Boston.Google Scholar
Meeroff, K. (2006) ‘Bartholemew Keckermann and the Anti-Ramist Tradition at Heidelberg’, in Strohm, C., Freedman, J.S. and Selderius, H.J. (eds.) Späthumanismus und reformierte Konfession. Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Philosophie in Heidelberg an der Wende zum 17. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: 169–205.Google Scholar
Meier-Oeser, S. (1997) Die Spur des Zeichens: das Zeichen und seine Funktion in der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Meier-Oeser, S. (2011) ‘Medieval Semiotics’, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Mendell, H. (1998) ‘Making Sense of Aristotelian Demonstration’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 161–225.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (1995) ‘Metaphysics, Dialectic and the Categories’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 100: 311–37.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (2002) ‘Plato and the Method of Analysis’, Phronesis 47: 193–223.Google Scholar
Micheli, G.A. (2015) ‘Philosophy and Historiography: The Kantian Turning-Point’, in Piaia, G. and Santinello, G. (eds.) Models of the History of Philosophy, vol. 3. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York and London: 697–768.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1978) ‘Sur la logique modale des Stoïciens’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.) Les Stoïciens et leur Logique. Paris: 317–46.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1993a) ‘The Stoic Analysis of the Sorites’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 231–45.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1993b) ‘The Stoic Themata’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 217–38.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1997) ‘Remarks on Aristotle’s Theory of Predication’, in Günther and Rengakos 1997: 135–51.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1999a) ‘Paradoxes’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 157–76.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1999b) ‘The Liar Paradox and the Stoics’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: 54–70.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2000) ‘Parts, Quantification and Aristotelian Predication’, Monist 83: 3–21.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2002) ‘Syllogism and Deduction in Aristotle’s Logic’, in Canto-Sperber and Pellegrin: 244–66.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2019) Ancient Logic, Language, and Metaphysics, ed. by Falcon, A. and Giaretta, P.. Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar
Mikkeli, H. (1992) An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1843) A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. London.Google Scholar
Milne, P. (1995) ‘On the Completeness of Non-Philonian Stoic Logic’, History and Philosophy of Logic 16: 39–64.Google Scholar
Mirhady, D.C. (2011) Rhetoric to Alexander. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Mirhady, D.C. and Too, Y.L. (2000) Isocrates I. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Monfasani, J. (1994) Language and Learning in Renaissance Italy: Selected Articles. London.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2008) ‘Logic’, in Hankinson, R.J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: 66–115.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2015) ‘What Is a Perfect Syllogism?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 107–66.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2019) ‘Theoretical Nous in the Posterior Analytics’, Manuscrito 42: 1–43.Google Scholar
Moss, A. (1993) ‘Commonplace-Rhetoric and Thought-Patterns in Early Modern Culture’, in Roberts, R.H. and Good, J.M.M. (eds.) The Recovery of Rhetoric: Persuasive Discourse and Disciplinarity in the Human Science. Charlottesville: 49–60.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1969) ‘Stoic and Peripatetic Logic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 51: 173–87.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1974) ‘Greek Mathematics and Greek Logic’, in Corcoran, J. (ed.) Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht and Boston: 35–70.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1979) ‘The Completeness of Stoic Propositional Logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20: 201–15.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (1991) ‘On the Notion of a Mathematical Starting Point in Plato, Aristotle, and Euclid’, in Bowen, A.C. (ed.) Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece. New York: 59–97.Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2004) Simplicius. On Aristotle On the Heavens 2.1–9, transl. London.Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1988) Introduction à la pensée des Mégariques. Paris and Brussels.Google Scholar
Narcy, M. (1984) Le philosophe et son double. Un commentaire de l’Euthydème de Platon. Paris.Google Scholar
Nasti De Vincentis, M. (2002) Logiche della connessività. Bern.Google Scholar
Nauta, L. (2009) In Defense of Common Sense: Lorenzo Valla’s Humanist Critique of Scholastic Philosophy. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1990) ‘Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato’s Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 7: 3–16.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (1999) The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2014) ‘The Problem of Pythagorean Mathematics’, in Huffman, C.A. (ed.) A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: 167–84.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2017) ‘Nothing to Do with Apollonius?: Concerning the Style and Chronology of Late-Archimedean Mathematics’, Philologus 161: 47–76.Google Scholar
Newton, L. (ed.) (2008) Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebel, E. (1959) Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung der geometrischen Konstruktion in der Antike. Cologne.Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, I. (1988) ‘From Possibility to Probability: British Discussions on Modality in the Nineteenth Century’, in Knuuttila 1988: 275–309.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. (2006) ‘Stoic Gunk’, Phronesis 51: 162–83.Google Scholar
Normore, C.G. (1993) ‘Cartesian Inference and Its Mediaeval Background’, Synthese 96: 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notomi, N. (1999) The Unity of Plato’s Sophist. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1973) Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. Amsterdam and London.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1991) Dilemmatic Arguments: Towards a History of Their Logic and Rhetoric. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1998) ‘Logic in the Seventeenth Century: Preliminary Remarks and the Constituents of the Proposition’, in Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, vol. 1. Cambridge: 103–17.Google Scholar
Ong, W.J. (1958a) Ramus, Method and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ong, W.J. (1958b) Ramus and Talon Inventory. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Oresme, N. (1961) Questiones super Geometriam Euclidis, ed. by Busard, H.L.L. Leiden.Google Scholar
Owen, G.E.L. (1965) ‘Inherence’, Phronesis 10: 97–105Google Scholar
Palmieri, P. (2017) ‘On Scientia and Regressus’, in Lagerlund, H. and Hill, B. (eds.) Routledge Companion to Sixteenth-Century Philosophy. New York and London: 319–49.Google Scholar
Papazian, M.B. (2001) ‘Chrysippus and the Destruction of Propositions: A Defence of the Standard Interpretation’, History and Philosophy of Logic 22: 1–12.Google Scholar
Papazian, M.B. (2012) ‘Chrysippus Confronts the Liar: The Case for Stoic Cassationism’, History and Philosophy of Logic 33: 1–18.Google Scholar
Papillon, T.L. (2004) Isocrates II. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Papillon, T.L. (2007) ‘Isocrates’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Malden, Oxford and Victoria: 58–74.Google Scholar
Park, W. (2019) ‘On the Hintikka/Woods-Hansen Controversy on Aristotelian Fallacies’, in Gabbay, D.M., Magnani, L., Park, W. and Pietarinen, A.-V. (eds.) Natural Arguments: A Tribute to John Woods. London: 423–46.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (2014) Articulating Medieval Logic. With an Appendix on Artificial Quantifiers in Early 16th-Century Logic. Oxford: 306–18.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (ed.) (2014) The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. (1993) ‘Aristotle’s Perfect Syllogisms, Predication, and the Dictum de Omni’, Synthese 96: 359–78.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. (1995) Aristotle’s Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Patzig, G. (1968) Aristotle’s Theory of the Syllogism: A Logico-Philological Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Peckhaus, V. (2018) ‘Leibniz’s Influence on 19th Century Logic’, in Zalta, E.N (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Peipers, D. (1883) Ontologia Platonica: Ad Notionum Terminorumque Historiam Symbola. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1857–1914) Manuscripts held at the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified in Robin, R. (1967) Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst. (=MS).Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1883) Studies in Logic. Boston.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1931–5) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. I–VI, ed. by Hartshorne, C and Weiss, P. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. VII–VIII, ed. by Burke, A., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1976) The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce. Vols. 1–4, ed. by Eisele, C. The Hague.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1984) Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. Vol. 2, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Pelletier, F.J. (1990) Parmenides, Plato, and the Semantics of Not‑Being. Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. (2020) ‘Conceptions of Truth in Plato’s Sophist’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102: 333–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, D. and Rudolph, U. (eds.) (2005) Logik und Theologie. Das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Petersen, P. (1921) Geschichte der Aristotelischen Philosophie im protestantischen Deutschland. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pignon, L. (1936) Catalogi et chronica: accedunt catalogi Stamsensis et Upsalensis scriptorium O.P., ed. by Meersseman, G. Rome.Google Scholar
Plantin, C. (2018) Dictionary of Argumentation: An Introduction to Argumentation Studies. London.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1948–49) Die Stoa. Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. 2 vols. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Poppi, A. (2004) ‘Zabarella, or Aristotelianism as a Rigorous Science’, in Pozzo, R. (ed.) The Impact of Aristotelianism on Modern Philosophy. Washington, DC: 35–63.Google Scholar
Porter, S.E. (1997) Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330BC–AD400. Leiden.Google Scholar
Poste, E. (1866) Aristotle on Fallacies, or The Sophistici Elenchi, transl. and comm. London.Google Scholar
Pozzo, R. (2012) Adversus Ramistas. Kontroversen über die Natur der Logik am Ende der Renaissance. Basel.Google Scholar
Prantl, C. (1855–70) Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande. 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Priest, G., Routley, R. and Norman, J. (eds.) (1989) Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Munich.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (1996) Die Aristotelische Topik. Munich.Google Scholar
Prior, A.N. (1955) ‘Diodoran Modalities’, Philosophical Quarterly 5: 205–13.Google Scholar
Prior, A.N. (1957) Time and Modality. Oxford.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1982) ‘Peirce the Logician’, Historia Mathematica 9: 290–301.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O (1950) Methods of Logic. New York.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O (1970) Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1971) From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1992) Pursuit of Truth. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rambourg, C. (2014) Topos. Les Premières Méthodes D’Argumentation Dans La Rhètorique Grecque des Ve–IVe Siècles. Paris.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2000) ‘Topos und Syllogismus in Aristoteles’ Topik’, in Schirren, T. and Ueding, G. (eds.) Topik und Rhetorik. Tübingen: 15–35.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2002) Aristoteles. Rhetorik. Übersetzung, Einleitung, Erläuterungen. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2011) ‘Aristotelische Grundbegriffe in der Theorie der juridischen Argumentation’, Rechtstheorie 42: 383–415.Google Scholar
Rapp., C. (2013) ‘Fallacious Arguments in Aristotle’s Rhetoric II.24’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 15: 122–58.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2020) ‘La syllogistique’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Rashed, M. (eds.) Boéthos de Sidon exégéte d’Aristote et philosophe. Berlin and Boston: 255–335.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2021) Ptolémée ‘al-Gharīb’, Épître à Gallus sur la vie, le testament et les écrits d’Aristote. Paris.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2000a) Das Buch E des aristotelischen Topik: Untersuchungen zur Echtsheitfrage. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2000b) Marcus Tullius Cicero. Topica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2002) ‘La Propiedad en los Tópicos de Aristóteles’, Anuario Filosófico 35: 341–64.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2015) ‘On Endoxa in Aristotle’s Topics’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 158: 225–46.Google Scholar
Repici, L. (1993) ‘The Stoics and the Elenchos’, in Döring and Ebert: 253–69.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1966) Galen and the Syllogism. Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Rini, A. (2011) Aristotle’s Modal Proofs: Prior Analytics A8–22 in Predicate Logic. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Risse, W. (1964–70) Die Logik der Neuzeit. 2 vols. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Rist, J.M. (1978) ‘Zeno and the Origins of Stoic Logic’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.) Les Stoïciens et leur logique. Paris: 387–400.Google Scholar
Robertson, D.G. (2004) ‘Chrysippus on Mathematical Objects’, Ancient Philosophy 24: 169–91.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1953) Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, G. (1996) Palaestra rationis. Discussioni su natura della copula e modalità nella filosofia ‘scolastica’ tedesca del XVII secolo. Florence.Google Scholar
Rose, L.E. (1968) Aristotle’s Syllogistic. Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
Rosen, J. and Malink, M. (2012) ‘A Method of Modal Proof in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42: 179–261.Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle. Prior and Posterior Analytics, ed. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ross, WD. (1951) Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. (2006) Logic and the Art of Memory: The Quest for a Universal Language. London and New York.Google Scholar
Rubinelli, S.R. (2003) ‘Topoi e idia nella Retorica di Aristotele’, Phronesis 48: 238–47.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, A. (1722) De sensu veri et falsi libri IV. 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rudolph, U. (2005) ‘Die Neubewertung der Logik durch al-Ghazālī’, in Perler and Rudolph 2005: 73–97.Google Scholar
Rudolph, U. (ed.) (2012) Philosophie in der islamischen Welt I. 8.–10. Jahrhundert. Basel.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1903) The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1905) ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14: 479–93.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1948) Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. New York.Google Scholar
Russell, B. and Whitehead, A.N. (1910) Principia Mathematica I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, D.A. (2001) Quintilian. The Orator’s Education. 5 vols. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1968) ‘Dialectic in the Academy’, in Owen, G.E.L (ed.) Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics. Oxford: 69–79.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1971) ‘Heterologicality’, in Collected Papers. New York: vol. 2, 250–7.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M. (2001) Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schepers, H. (1959) Andreas Rüdigers Methodologie und ihre Voraussetzungen. Cologne.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2002) ‘Aristotle on the Fallacies of Combination and Division in Sophistici Elenchi 4’, History and Philosophy of Logic 24: 111–29.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.T. (1839) Stoicorum grammatica. Halle.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C.B. (1983) John Case and Aristotelianism in Renaissance England. Kingston and Montreal.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C.B. (1988) ‘The Rise of the Philosophical Textbook’, in Schmitt, C.B, Skinner, Q., Kessler, E. and Kraye, J. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: 792–804.Google Scholar
Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M.F and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1980) Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schreiber, S.G. (2003) Aristotle on False Reasoning: Language and World in the Sophistical Refutations. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Schuhl, P.-M. (1960) Le dominateur et les possible. Paris.Google Scholar
Schuurman, P. (2004) Ideas, Mental Faculties and Method: The Logic of Ideas of Descartes and Locke and Its Reception in the Dutch Republic, 1630–1750. Leiden.Google Scholar
Schwab, W. (2016) ‘Understanding Epistēmē in Plato’s Republic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 41–85.Google Scholar
Scolnicov, S. (2013) Euthydemus: Ethics and Language. St. Augustin.Google Scholar
Sebestik, J. (2021) ‘Bolzano’s Logic’, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. (1977) ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 23: 74–120.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. (1982) ‘On Signs’, in Barnes, Brunschwig, Burnyeat and Schofield 1982: 239–72.Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. (2002) ‘Aristotelian Relativities’, in Canto-Sperber and Pellegrin 2002: 324–52. [Transl. of (1997) ‘Relatività aristoteliche (Parte I)’, Dianoia 2: 11–25.]Google Scholar
Sedley, D.N. (2003) ‘Philodemus and the Decentralisation of Philosophy’, Cronache Ercolanesi 33: 31–41.Google Scholar
Sgarbi, M. (2013) The Aristotelian Tradition and the Rise of British Empiricism. Logic and Epistemology in the British Isles (1570–1689). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York and London.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2000) Thinking About Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. New York.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2005) ‘Logical Consequence, Proof Theory and Model Theory’, in Shapiro, S (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford: 651–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharvy, R. (1972) ‘Euthyphro 9D–11B: Analysis and Definition in Plato and Others’, Noûs 6: 119–37.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (1999) Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2016) ‘The Young Dogs of Eristic: Dialectic and Eristic in the Early Academy’, in Thaler, N. (ed.) Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Leiden: 31–54.Google Scholar
Shoesmith, D.J. and Smiley, T.J. (1978) Multiple-Conclusion Logic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1924) ‘The Origin of the Syllogism’, Classical Philology: 1–19.Google Scholar
Simons, P. (1992) Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1996) Rhetoric and Reason in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Slomkowski, P. (1997) Aristotle’s Topics. Leiden.Google Scholar
Smiley, T. (1973) ‘What Is a Syllogism?’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 136–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1978) ‘The Mathematical Origins of Aristotle’s Syllogistic’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19: 201–9.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1982a) ‘The Relationship of Aristotle’s Two Analytics’, Classical Quarterly 32: 327–35.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1982b) ‘The Syllogism in Posterior Analytics I’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 64: 113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1982c) ‘What Is Aristotelian Ecthesis?’, History and Philosophy of Logic 3: 113–27.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle. Prior Analytics, transl. and notes. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1995) ‘Logic’, in Barnes 1995: 27–65.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2017) ‘Aristotle’s Logic’, in Zalta, E.N (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1929) Die Entwicklung der aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941) ‘The Discovery of the Syllogism’, The Philosophical Review 50: 410–21.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1968) ‘Dialectic without the Forms’, in Owen, G.E.L. (ed.) Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics. Oxford: 49–68.Google Scholar
Sommers, F. (1982) The Logic of Natural Language. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1980) Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2005) The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook. Volume 3: Logic and Metaphysics. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Speca, A. (2001) Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Sprague, R. (1962) Plato’s Use of Fallacy: A Study of the Euthydemus and Some Other Dialogues. New York.Google Scholar
Sprute, J. (1982) Die Enthymemtheorie der aristotelischen Rhetorik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Steinkrüger, P. (2015) ‘Aristotle’s Assertoric Syllogistic and Modern Relevance Logic’, Synthese 192: 1413–44.Google Scholar
Stopper, M.R. (1983) ‘Schizzi pirroniani’, Phronesis 28: 265–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, T. (2001) ‘“The eminent later scholar” in Avicenna’s Book of the Syllogism’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 11: 205–18.Google Scholar
Street, T. (2002) ‘An Outline of Avicenna’s Syllogistic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84: 129–60.Google Scholar
Street, T. (2004) ‘Arabic Logic’, in Gabbay and Woods 2004: 523–96.Google Scholar
Street, T. (2005) ‘Fahraddīn ar-Rāzī’s Critique of Avicennan Logic’, in Perler and Rudolph 2005: 99–116.Google Scholar
Street, T. (2013) ‘Avicenna on the Syllogism’, in Adamson 2013: 48–70.Google Scholar
Street, T. (2022) ‘Abū l-Barakāt al-Bagdādī and the Traditions of Arabic Logic’, Studia Graeco-Arabica 11: 41–66.Google Scholar
Street, T. and Gemann, N. (2013) ‘Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Language and Logic’, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1977) ‘Epicurus on the Truth of All Sense Impressions’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59: 125–43. [Repr. in G. Striker, Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: 77–91.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1979) ‘Aristoteles Über Syllogismen “Aufgrund Einer Hypothese”’, Hermes 107: 33–50.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1994) ‘Modal vs. Assertoric Syllogistic’, Ancient Philosophy 14: 39–51.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996) ‘Perfection and Reduction in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics’, in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: 203–19.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1998) ‘Aristotle and the Uses of Logic’, in Gentzler, J. (ed.) Method in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: 209–26.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2009) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics: Book 1, transl. and notes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Strobino, R. (2018) ‘Ibn Sina’s Logic’, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Strobino, R. and Thom, P. (2016) ‘The Logic of Modality’, in Dutilh-Novaes and Read 2016: 342–69.Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1989) Dialectic and Its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. (1967) Apuleian Logic: The Nature Source and Influence of Apuleius’s Peri Hermeneias. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sundholm, G. (2009) ‘A Century of Judgment and Inference, 1837–1936: Some Strands in the Development of Logic’, in Haaparanta 2009b: 263–317.Google Scholar
Swanson, C.E. (2011) ‘Socratic Dialectic and the Resolution of Fallacy in Plato’s Euthydemus’. Doctoral thesis, Rutgers.Google Scholar
Swanson, C.E. (2017) ‘Aristotle on Ignorance of the Definition of Refutation’, Apeiron 50: 153–96.Google Scholar
Szabó, Á. (1978) The Beginnings of Greek Mathematics. Berlin.Google Scholar
Szaif, J. (1998) Platons Begriff der Wahrheit. 2nd ed. Munich.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1981) Speusippus of Athens. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tarski, A. (1994) Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C.C.W. (1980) ‘“All Perceptions are True”’, in Schofield, Burnyeat and Barnes 1980: 105–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.C.W. (2006) ‘Socrates the Sophist’, in Judson, L. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.) Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: 157–68.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.R. (2006) Classical Mechanics. Mill Valley, CA.Google Scholar
Thiel, D. (2006) Die Philosophie des Xenokrates im Kontext der Alten Akademie. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thom, P. (1981) The Syllogism. Munich.Google Scholar
Thom, P. (2003) Medieval Modal Systems: Problems and Concepts. Aldershot and Burlington.Google Scholar
Thom, P. (2007) Logic and Ontology in the Syllogistic of Robert Kilwardby. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Thom, P. (2019) Robert Kilwardby’s Science of Logic: A Thirteenth-Century Intensional Logic. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, I. (1965) ‘The Later History of the Pons Asinorum’, in Tymieniecka, A.T. (ed.) Contributions to Logic and Methodology in Honor of J.M. Bocheński. Amsterdam: 142–50.Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, Ch. (2010) ‘The “Anonymus Aurelianensis III” and the reception of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics in the Latin West’, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin 79: 25–41.Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, Ch. (ed.) (2015) Anonymus Aurelianensis III’ in Aristotelis Analytica priora: Critical Edition, Introduction, Notes, and Indexes. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Todd, M. (1987) Christian Humanism and the Puritan Social Order. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Todd, R.B. (1973) ‘The Stoic Common Notions: A Re‐examination and Reinterpretation’, Symbolae Osloenses 48: 47–75.Google Scholar
Tolsa, C. (2013) ‘Claudius Ptolemy and Self-Promotion: A Study on Ptolemy’s Intellectual Milieu in Roman Alexandria’. Doctoral thesis, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tredennick, H. and Forster, E.S. (1960) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics/Topica, transl. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, A. (1840) Logische Untersuchungen I–II. Berlin.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, A. (1867) Historische Beiträge zur Philosophie, Dritter Band: Vermischte Abhandlungen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Tuominen, M. (2010) ‘Back to Posterior Analytics II 19: Aristotle on the Knowledge of Principles’, Apeiron 43: 115–44.Google Scholar
Überweg, F. (1882) System der Logik und Geschichte der logischen Lehren. Bonn.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. (2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B.C. (1966) ‘Singular Terms, Truth Value Gaps and Free Logic’, Journal of Philosophy 63: 481–95.Google Scholar
van Heijenoort, J. (ed.) (1967) From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1937. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, J. (2016) The Aristotelian Mechanics: Text and Diagrams. Berlin.Google Scholar
Vasoli, C. (1968) La dialettica e la retorica dell’umanesimo. Milan.Google Scholar
Vilkko, R. (2009) ‘The Logic Question During the First Half of the Nineteenth Century’, in Haaparanta 2009b: 203–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitrac, B. (2002) ‘Note Textuelle sur un (Probleme de) Lieu Geometrique dans les Meteorologiques d’Aristote (III. 5, 375 b 16–376 b 22)’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 56: 239–83.Google Scholar
Vlasits, J. (2019) ‘Mereology in Aristotle’s Assertoric Syllogistic’, History and Philosophy of Logic 40: 1–11.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1983) ‘The Socratic Elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 27–58 and 71–4.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1994) ‘Anamnesis in the Meno’, in Day, J. (ed.) Plato’s Meno in Focus. London and New York: 88–111.Google Scholar
Volpe, G. (2005) Teorie della verità. Milan.Google Scholar
von Arnim, J. (1903–24) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 4 vols. Leipzig. (=SVF)Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1962) ‘Review about P.-M. Schuhl, 1960 Le dominateur et les possibles (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)’, Gnomon 34: 138–52.Google Scholar
Vuillemin, J. (1979) ‘L’argument dominateur’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 84: 225–57.Google Scholar
Walton, D. (1981) ‘The Fallacy of Many Questions’, Logique et Analyse 95–6: 291–313.Google Scholar
Walton, D. (1996) Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto.Google Scholar
Walton, D. (2013) Methods of Argumentation. New York.Google Scholar
Waterlow, S. (1982) Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle’s Modal Concepts. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. (2018) ‘Plato’s Theory of Knowledge’, in Brink, D.O., Meyer, S.S. and Shields, C. (eds.) Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Works of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin. Oxford: 33–56.Google Scholar
Wedin, M. V. (2000) ‘Some Logical Problems in Metaphysics Γ’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19: 113–62.Google Scholar
Wedin, M. V. (2009) ‘The Science and Axioms of Being’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Aristotle. Oxford: 125–43.Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (1987) ‘Das sogenannte Meisterargument des Diodoros Kronos und der Aristotelische Möglichkeitsbegriff’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69: 18–53.Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (1989) ‘Aristotle on Inferences from Signs (Rhetoric I 2, 1357b1–25)’, Phronesis 34: 343–51.Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (1999) ‘“Aus etwas Möglichem folgt nichts Unmögliches”. Zum Verständnis der zweiten Prämisse von Diodors Meisterargument’, in Meixner, U. and Newen, A. (eds.) Antike Philosophie mit einem Schwerpunkt zum Meisterargument / Ancient Philosophy With a Focus on the Master Argument. Paderborn: 189–202.Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (2014) Aristoteles. Peri Hermeneias. 3rd ed. Berlin.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. (2004) Frege Explained: From Arithmetic to Analytic Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. (2011) ‘A Deflationary Reading of Aristotle’s Definitions of Truth and Falsehood at Metaphysics 1011b26–7’, Apeiron 44: 67–90.Google Scholar
Whitaker, C.W.A. (1996) Aristotle’s De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford.Google Scholar
White, A.R. (1970) Truth. London.Google Scholar
Wieacker, F. (1988) Römische Rechtsgeschichte, I. Munich.Google Scholar
William of Ockham (1974) Summa logicae, ed. by Boehner, P., Gál, G. and Brown, S.. St. Bonaventure, NY.Google Scholar
Williams, C.J.F. (1976) What Is Truth? Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994) Vagueness. London.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. (2012) Hermagoras. Paris.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (1728) Philosophia rationalis, sive logica. Frankfurt and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (2009) ‘Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40: 341–55.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1999) ‘Rhetoric and Relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias’, in Long, A.A. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: 290–310.Google Scholar
Woods, J. (2013) ‘Ancestor Worship in the Logic of Games: How Foundational Were Aristotle’s Contributions?’, The Baltic International Year Book of Cognition, Logic and Communication, vol. 8, Games, Game Theory and Game Semantics. Berlin: 1–38.Google Scholar
Woods, J. (2013/2014) Errors of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference. London. [Repr. with corrections in 2014.]Google Scholar
Woods, J. (2014a) Aristotle’s Earlier Logic. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Woods, J. (2014b) ‘A History of the Fallacies in Western Logic’, in Gabbay, D.M. and Pelletier, F.J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Questions. Amsterdam: 513–610.Google Scholar
Woods, J. (2016) ‘Does Changing the Subject from A to B Really Enlarge Our Understanding of A?’, Logic Journal of the IGPL 24: 456–80.Google Scholar
Woods, J. (2021) ‘What Did Frege Take Russell to Have Proved?’, Synthese 198: 3949–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, J. and Hansen, H.V. (1997) ‘Hintikka on Aristotle’s Fallacies’, Synthese 113: 217–39.Google Scholar
Woods, J. and Irvine, A. (2004) ‘Aristotle’s Early Logic’, in Gabbay and Woods 2004: 27–99.Google Scholar
Woods, J. and Rosales, A. (2010) ‘Virtuous Distortion: Idealization and Abstraction in Model-Based Science’, in Magnani, L., Carnielli, W. and Pizzi, C. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning. Berlin: 3–30.Google Scholar
Woods, J. and Walton, D. (1977) ‘Composition and Division’, Studia Logica 36: 381–406.Google Scholar
Woods, J. and Walton, D. (1982) ‘The Petitio: Aristotle’s Five Ways’, The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12: 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, J. and Walton, D. (1989) Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972–1982. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Wörner, M. (1990) Das Ethische in der Rhetorik des Aristoteles. Freiburg and Munich.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1880) Logik: Eine Untersuchung der Principien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden Wissenschaftlicher Forschung, Erster Band: Erkenntnislehre. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Xenakis, J. (1957) ‘Plato on Statement and Truth-Value’, Mind n.s. 66: 165–72.Google Scholar
Yolton, J.W. (1955) ‘Locke and the Seventeenth Century Logic of Ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas 16: 431–52.Google Scholar
Yolton, J.W. (1986) ‘Schoolmen, Logic and Philosophy’, in Sutherland, L.S and Mitchell, L.G. (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. V: The Eighteenth Century. Oxford: 565–91.Google Scholar
Young, C.M. (1994) ‘Plato and Computer Dating’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12: 227–50.Google Scholar
Youschkevitch, A.P. (1976) ‘The Concept of Function Up to the Middle of the 19th Century’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 16: 37–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, E. (1882) ‘Über den κυριεύων des Megarikers Diodorus’, in Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 151–9. [Repr. in E. Zeller (1910) Kleine Schriften, I. Berlin: 252–62.]Google Scholar
Zeman, J. (1997) ‘Peirce and Philo’, in Houser, N., Roberts, D.D. and Van Evra, J. (eds.) Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington, IN and Indianapolis: 402–17.Google Scholar
Zonta, M. (1998) ‘Al-Fārābī's Commentaries on Aristotelian Logic: New Discoveries’, in Vermeulen, U. and De Smet, D. (eds.) Philosophy and the Arts in the Islamic World. Leuven: 219–32.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Luca Castagnoli, University of Oxford, Paolo Fait, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic
  • Online publication: 29 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107477674.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Luca Castagnoli, University of Oxford, Paolo Fait, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic
  • Online publication: 29 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107477674.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Luca Castagnoli, University of Oxford, Paolo Fait, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic
  • Online publication: 29 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107477674.021
Available formats
×