Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Sources for the period
- 2 The succession to Alexander
- 3 Monarchies and monarchic Ideas
- 4 The formation of the Hellenistic kingdoms
- 5 Ptolemaic Egypt
- 6 Syria and the East
- 7 Macedonia and Greece
- 8 Cultural, social and economic features of the Hellenistic world
- 9 Hellenistic science: its application in peace and war
- 10 Agathocles
- 11 The Syrian-Egyptian Wars and the new lingdoms of Asia Minor
- 12 Macedonia and the Greek leagues
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Index
- Map 3. Egypt.
- Map 4. Hellenistic Asia.
- Map 5. The Greek mainland and the Aegean.
- References
10 - Agathocles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- 1 Sources for the period
- 2 The succession to Alexander
- 3 Monarchies and monarchic Ideas
- 4 The formation of the Hellenistic kingdoms
- 5 Ptolemaic Egypt
- 6 Syria and the East
- 7 Macedonia and Greece
- 8 Cultural, social and economic features of the Hellenistic world
- 9 Hellenistic science: its application in peace and war
- 10 Agathocles
- 11 The Syrian-Egyptian Wars and the new lingdoms of Asia Minor
- 12 Macedonia and the Greek leagues
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Index
- Map 3. Egypt.
- Map 4. Hellenistic Asia.
- Map 5. The Greek mainland and the Aegean.
- References
Summary
AGATHOCLES' RISE AND SEIZURE OF POWER
At the time of Timoleon's death in 337 B.C. the situation in Sicily seemed quite stable: the tyrannies had been removed and replaced by democratic systems, the Carthaginians had been decisively defeated in the battle at the Crimisus, the Greek cities of the island had been drawn together into a symmachia under the hegemony of Syracuse and a generous settlement programme had been carried through that seemed to promise the island a new period of prosperity. In reality, however, Timoleon's work was not of long duration. Soon after his death bitter party struggles and social unrest broke out, particularly in Syracuse, where Timoleon had established a moderate form of democracy. This constitution proved to be very short-lived, for as early as about 330 power fell into the hands of an oligarchic coterie of 600 men from the noble and wealthy families under the leadership of Sosistratus and Heracleides. The constitutional battles reflected not only the long-standing antagonism between oligarchs and democrats but above all the contrast between old and new citizens. In addition, an important role in the factional struggle was played by the ‘radicals’, that is to say the many people without property who were hostile to the ruling oligarchy. The Sicels, in so far as they were politically and economically dependent on Syracuse, also constituted a source of unrest. These sharp political and social contrasts explain how it was that one man was able to assert himself in the struggle against the ruling oligarchy and to seize absolute power in the form of a typical military monarchy.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Ancient History , pp. 384 - 411Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1984
References
- 7
- Cited by