Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T20:59:42.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Measuring knowledge work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Rob Austin  and
Pat Larkey
Edited by
Andy Neely
Rob Austin
Affiliation:
Associate Professor Harvard Business School, USA
Pat Larkey
Affiliation:
Professor Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Andy Neely
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, UK
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The explosive growth of the information-related and science-based sectors of industrialized economies has seen concomitant growth in the demand for products and services with potential to help organizations apply what they know more profitably. There are entirely new occupational categories – combinatorial chemist, network manager, software engineer, to name just a few – that produce economic value mostly by creating and manipulating symbols. Even in traditional occupations, ways of working have come to depend on intellectual activity more than physical activity. Factory workers invent and share process improvement ideas; salespeople develop novel ways to use the Web to reach or retain customers.

As the nature of work has changed, the relationship between an organization's measured resources and its market success has become tenuous. Factors that contribute substantially to a firm's market success largely elude traditional means of quantification. Unlike materials and equipment, core competencies comprised of the distinctive abilities of employees and teams are not easily captured on balance sheets. This fact not only makes valuation of individual firms harder, it also complicates traditional analyses for allocating resources, improving processes, and compensating employees.

Existing notions of performance measurement and organizational control meet with substantial challenges in knowledge work settings. In this chapter, we identify distinctive characteristics of “knowledge work” that impact our ability to measure it, and briefly discuss the research challenges and practical implications associated with those characteristics. Conceptually, these characteristics can be placed in three categories.

First, knowledge work is less observable than physical work.

Type
Chapter
Information
Business Performance Measurement
Unifying Theory and Integrating Practice
 , pp. 279 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amabile, Teresa M. (2005). Conversation with the author.
Amabile, Teresa M. (1996). Creativity in Context, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
Austin, R. D. (1999). Trilogy Software, Inc., Case no. N9–699–034. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Austin, R. D.(1996). Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations. New York: Dorset House.Google Scholar
Austin, Robert D. and Patrick D. Larkey (2000). “Performance Based Incentives in Knowledge Work: Are Agency Models Relevant?” Int. J. Business Performance Management, Vol. 2, Nos. 1/2/3, p. 57.CrossRef
Alchian, A., and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–95.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. (1992). Incentives, contracts and performance measurement. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 598–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banker, R. D., and Datar, S. M. (1989). Sensitivity, precision and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (1990). Essays on the Foundations of Game Theory. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1963). The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Frederick (1995). The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, 20th Anniversary Edition Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Curtis, B., Krasner, H., and Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Thomas H. (2005). Thinking for a living: How to Get Better Performances and Results from Knowledge Workers, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage what They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrisic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31(2), 134–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., and Brown, S. L. (1997). Competing on the Edge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. A. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. (1993). Motivation as a limit to pricing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannaway, J. (1992). Higher-order thinking, job design and incentives: an analysis and proposal. American Education Research Journal, 29(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgard, E. and Bower, G. (1975). Theories of Learning (4th ed), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Hiltzik, Michael A. (1999). Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age, New York: Harper Collins. pp. 145–146.
Hirsch, F. (1976). The Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. (1987). Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica, 55, 302–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P. (1991). Multi-task principal–agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, 7, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way (trans. Lu, D. J.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, A. (1993). Why work incentives fall down on the job. USA Today, 16 December, A13.
Larkey, P., Kadane, J., Austin, R., and Zamir, S. (1997). Skill in games. Management Science, 43(5), 596–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. E. III, and Rhode, J. G. (1976). Information and Control in Organizations. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.Google Scholar
Leavitt, B., and March, J. G. (1988). Chester I. Barnard and the intelligence of learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–40.Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
March, J. G., and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
McGraw, K. O. (1978). The detrimental effects of reward on performance: a literature review and a prediction model. In Lepper, M. R., and Greene, D. (eds.), The Hidden Costs of Reward: New Perspectives on the Psychology of Human Motivation, 33–60. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of the Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1981). How American Business can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C., and Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
Ridgway, V. F. (1956). Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(2), 240–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: the principal's problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–9.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1989). Models of Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, R. (1996). How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. (1966). Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Stake, R. E. (1971). Testing hazards in performance contracting. Phi Delta Kappan, 54, 583–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vroom, V. H., and Deci, E. L. (eds.) (1970). Management and Motivation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Measuring knowledge work
    • By Rob Austin, Associate Professor Harvard Business School, USA, Pat Larkey, Professor Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Edited by Andy Neely, Cranfield University, UK
  • Book: Business Performance Measurement
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Measuring knowledge work
    • By Rob Austin, Associate Professor Harvard Business School, USA, Pat Larkey, Professor Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Edited by Andy Neely, Cranfield University, UK
  • Book: Business Performance Measurement
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Measuring knowledge work
    • By Rob Austin, Associate Professor Harvard Business School, USA, Pat Larkey, Professor Carnegie Mellon University, USA
  • Edited by Andy Neely, Cranfield University, UK
  • Book: Business Performance Measurement
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488481.017
Available formats
×