Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:28:37.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The Linguistic Prehistory of the Sahara

from Part VI - Linguistic Aspects of Migration and Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2019

M. C. Gatto
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
D. J. Mattingly
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
N. Ray
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
M. Sterry
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

The expansion of languages such as Hassaniya and Tuareg are demonstrably recent and a prior history is there to be uncovered.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Manga, A. A. 1995. The Songhai speech communities in the Sudan with special reference to the Songhai speakers of the Blue Nile. In Nicolai, R. and Rottland, F. (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 1327.Google Scholar
Al-Chennafi, M. and Norris, H. T. 1981. How the Hassaniyya vernacular of Mauritania supplanted Zenaga. The Maghreb Review 76.5–6: 7778.Google Scholar
Ameur, M. 1990. A propos de la classification des dialectes berbères. Etudes et Documents Berbères 7: 1527.Google Scholar
Anon, . n.d. Chants de Femmes Nemadi. Label: Buda Musique, Ref: CD 926212.Google Scholar
Anthonioz, R. 1968. Les Imraguen, pêcheurs nomades de Mauritanie. Bulletin de l’Institut fondamental d’Afrique noire 29, série B 3–4.2: 695738.Google Scholar
Arnaud, R. 1906. Chasseurs et pêcheurs du Tagant et du Hodh. La Géographie 13: 148–49.Google Scholar
Attayoub, A. K. 2001. La Tətsərret des Ayttawari Seslem: identification socio-linguistique d’un parler berbère non-documenté chez les Touaregs de l’Azawagh (Niger). Mémoire de maîtrise. Paris: Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales.Google Scholar
Baroin, C. 1985. Anarchie et cohésion chez les Téda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Basset, A. 1933. Note sur les parlers zenaga. Bulletin du comité d’études historiques et scientifiques de l’Afrique Occidentale française 1933: 319–32.Google Scholar
Basset, A. 1952. La langue berbère. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bechhaus-Gerst, M. 1989. Nubier und Kuschiten im Niltal. Sprach- und Kulturkontakte im ‘no man’s land’. Köln: Afrikanische Arbeitspapiere.Google Scholar
Behrens, P. 1989. Langues et migrations des premiers pasteurs du Sahara: la formation de la branche berbère. In Libya Antiqua. Reports and Papers of the Symposium organized by UNESO in Paris, 16–18 January 1984, Paris: UNESCO, 3153.Google Scholar
Bellair, P. 1951. La ramla des Daouada (Fezzân). Travaux de l’institut de recherches sahariennes 7: 6986.Google Scholar
Bernus, E. 1981. Touaregs Nigériens. Unité culturelle et diversité régionale d’un peuple pasteur. Mémoires ORSTOM n. 94. Paris: Éditions de l’office de la recherche scientifique et techniques outre-mer.Google Scholar
Biagetti, S., Kaci, A. A. and di Lernia, S. 2015. The ‘written landscape’ of the central Sahara: recording and digitising the Tifinagh inscriptions in the Tadrart Acacus Mountains. In Kominko, M. (ed.), From Dust to Digital: Ten Years of the Endangered Archives Programme, United Kingdom: Open Book Publishers, 130.Google Scholar
Biagetti, S., Kaci, A. A., Mori, L. and di Lernia, S. 2012. Writing the desert: the ‘Tifinagh’ rock inscriptions of the Tadrart Acacus (southwestern Libya). Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 47.2: 153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blench, R. M. 2001. Types of language spread and their archaeological correlates: the example of Berber. Origini 23: 169–90.Google Scholar
Brett, M. and Fentress, E. 1996. The Berbers. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brogan, O. 1954. The camel in Roman Tripolitania. Papers of the British School at Rome 22: 126–31.Google Scholar
Brooks, N., Clarke, J., Garfi, S., and Pirie, A. 2009. The archaeology of Western Sahara: results of environmental and archaeological reconnaissance. Antiquity 83.322: 918–34.Google Scholar
Brosset, (Capt.) D. 1932. Les Némadi. Bulletin de l’Afrique de l’Ouest Française, Renseignements coloniaux: 337–46.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1961. Monuments et rites funéraires protohistoriques. Paris: Arts et métiers graphiques.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1974. L’âge du tombeau de Tin Hinan, ancêtre des Touareg du Hoggar. Zephyrus 25: 497516.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1980. Berbères. Aux marges de l’histoire. Toulouse: Hespérides.Google Scholar
Çelebi, E. 1995/2007. Evliya Çelebi Seyahatnâmesi, Topkapi Sarayi Bagdat 304 Yazamasinin Transkripsyonu –Dizini. 10 vols. Gökyay, O. S. and Dağh, Y. eds. Istanbul: Yapi Kredi Yayinlari.Google Scholar
Chaker, S. 2002. L’écriture libyco-berbère. État des lieux et perspectives. Colloque annuel de la SHESL, Lyon-ENS, samedi 2 février 2002.Google Scholar
Chalmel, , (Capt.) 1931. Notice sur les Bideyat. Bulletin de la société de recherches congolaises 15: 3391.Google Scholar
Chapelle, J. 1957. Nomades noirs du Sahara. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Clapperton, H. 1829. Journal of a Second Expedition into the Interior of Africa. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Cleaveland, T. 2002. Becoming Walāta. A History of Saharan Social Formation and Transformation. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Cline, W. 1950. The Teda of Tibesti, Borku and Kawar in the Eastern Sahara. Menasha, WI: George Banta Publishing.Google Scholar
Creissels, D. 1981. De la possibilité de rapprochements entre le Songhay et les langues Niger-Congo (en particulier Mandé). In Schadeberg, T. and Bender, M. L. (eds), Nilo-Saharan: Proceedings of the First Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, Leiden, September 8 –10, Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 185–99.Google Scholar
Daniels, C. M. 1975. An ancient people of the Libyan Sahara. In J. and Bynon, T. (eds), Hamito-Semitica, The Hague: Mouston, 249–65.Google Scholar
De Noray, M. L. 2006. Le livre des Imraguen: pêcheurs du banc d’Arguin en Mauritanie. Paris: Buchet-Chastel.Google Scholar
De Pommerol, P. J. 1997. L’arabe tchadien: Émergence d’une langue véhiculaire. Paris: Karthala Editions.Google Scholar
di Lernia, S. 2001. Dismantling dung: delayed use of food resources among Early Holocene foragers of the Libyan Sahara. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20: 408–41.Google Scholar
di Lernia, S. 2006. Building monuments, creating identity: cattle cult as a social response to rapid environmental changes in the Holocene Sahara. Quaternary International 151: 5062.Google Scholar
di Lernia, S. 2013. The emergence and spread of herding in Northern Africa. In Mitchell, P. and Lane, P. (eds), Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 527–40.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G. J. 2007. Eastern Sudanic and the Wadi Howar and Wadi El Milk diaspora. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 18:3767.Google Scholar
Drake, N. A., Blench, R. M., Armitage, S. J., Bristow, C. S. and White, K. H. 2011. Ancient watercourses and biogeography of the Sahara explain the peopling of the desert. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108.2: 458–62.Google Scholar
Dubié, P. 1940. L’îlot berbérophone de Mauritanie. Bulletin de l’Institut fondamental d’Afrique noire 2: 315–25.Google Scholar
Faidherbe, L. L. 1877. Le Zenaga des tribus Sénégalaises. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Fevrier, J. G. 1965. La constitution municipale de Dougga à l’époque numide. Mélanges de Carthage 1964–65:8591.Google Scholar
Fondacci, P. H. (Capt.). 1945. Les Némadis. Paris: Mémoire du CHEAM n. 1009.Google Scholar
Fortier, C. 2004. Au miroir de l’autre: Chasseurs (Némadi) et pêcheurs (Imraguen) dans un monde de pasteurs nomades (Mauritanie). Figures Sahariennes 7. http://recherche.univ-montp3.fr/cerce/r7/c.f.htm, accessed 2/6/2016.Google Scholar
Fuchs, P. 1961. Die Völker der Südost-Sahara: Tibesti, Borku, Ennedi. Vienna: W. Braumüller.Google Scholar
Fuchs, P. 1983. Das Brot der Wüste. Sozio-Okonomie der Sahara-Kanuri von Fachi. Studien zur Kulturkunde 67. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Gabelenz, G. 1894. Die Verwandschaft des Baskischen mit den Berbersprachen Nordafrikas. Braunschweig: A. C. Graf von der Schulenburg.Google Scholar
Gabus, J. 1952. Contribution à l’étude des Némadi, chasseurs archaïques du Djouf. Bulletin de la Société Suisse d’Anthropologie et d’Ethnologie 52: 4983.Google Scholar
Galand, L. 1971. Unité et diversité du vocabulaire berbère. In Giuffre, A. (ed.), Atti della settimana magrebina. Cagliari 22–25 Maggio 1969, Milan: Università di Cagliari, Istituto di Studi Africani, 1720.Google Scholar
Galand, L. 1988. Berberisch: der Schlüssel zum Altkanarischen? Almogaren 18–19:716.Google Scholar
Garcea, E. A. A. (ed.). 2013. Gobero: the No-Return Frontier. Archaeology and Landscape at the Saharo-Sahelian Borderland. Frankfurt: Africa Magna Verlag.Google Scholar
Gauthier, A. 2001. The Early to Late Neolithic archeofaunas from Nabta and Bir Kiseiba. In Wendorf, F. and Schild, R. (eds), Holocene Settlement of the Egyptian Sahara Volume 1: The Archaeology of Nabta Playa, New York: Springer, 609–35.Google Scholar
Gautier, A. 1984. Archaeozoology of the Bir Kiseiba Region. In Wendorf, F. and Schild, R. (eds), Cattle-Keepers of the Eastern Sahara, Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 4972.Google Scholar
Gautier, A. 1987. Prehistoric men and cattle in North Africa: a dearth of data and a surfeit of models. In Close, A. (ed.), Prehistory of Arid North Africa. Essays in Honor of Fred Wendorf, Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 163–87.Google Scholar
Gerteiny, A. G. 1967. Mauritania. New York: Frederic A. Praeger.Google Scholar
González Anton, R. and Tejera Gaspar, A. 1990. Los aborígenes canarios: Gran Canaria y Tenerife. Oviedo: Ediciones Istmo.Google Scholar
Gsell, S. 1933. La Tripolitaine et le Sahara au IIIème siècle. Mémoires de l’Académie des Inscriptions 43: 149–66.Google Scholar
Habraszewski, T. 1967. Kanuri – language and people – in the ‘Travel book’ (Siyahetname) of Evliya Çelebi. Africana Bulletin 6: 5966.Google Scholar
Haour, A., Banni Guene, O., Gosselain, O., Livingstone Smith, A. and N’Dah, D. 2011. Survey along the Niger River valley at the Benin-Niger border. Nyame Akuma 76: 2332.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1998a. Dictionnaire Songhay –Anglais- Français. Tome I, Koyra Chinni. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1998b. Dictionnaire Songhay –Anglais- Français. Tome II, Djenné Chinni. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2006. Dictionnaire touareg du Mali. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Hermans, J. M. 2013. Les Nemadis, chasseurs-cueilleurs du désert mauritanien. Paris: Edilivre.Google Scholar
Jongeling, K. and Kerr, R. M. 2005. Late Punic Epigraphy: an Introduction to the Study of Neo-Punic and Latino-Punic Inscriptions. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. M. 2010. Latino-Punic Epigraphy. A Descriptive Study of the Inscriptions. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossmann, M. 1999. Essai sur la phonologie du proto-berbère. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Kossmann, M. 2013. The Arabic Influence on Northern Berber. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, A. 1958. Die Teda von Tibesti. Wiener Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte und Linguistik XII. Vienna: Ferdinand Berger.Google Scholar
Laforgue, P. 1917. Une fraction non musulmane en Mauritanie saharienne, les Némadi. Annuaire et mémoires du comité d’études historiques et scientifiques de l’Afrique occidentale française: 685–92.Google Scholar
Laoust, E. 1932. Siwa. I. Son parler. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Le Quellec, J. L. 2011. Rock art, scripts and proto-scripts in Africa: the Libyco-Berber example. In Delmas, A. and Penn, N. (eds), Written Cultures in a Colonial Context: Africa and the Americas, 1500–1900, Leiden: Brill, 329.Google Scholar
Le Quellec, J. L. and Civrac, M. A. 2010. La chasse au filet sur les peintures rupestres du Sahara central et dans l’antiquité. Les cahiers des amis de l’art rupestre saharien 14: 255–62.Google Scholar
Le Rouvreur, A. (ed.). 1989. Sahéliens et sahariens du Tchad. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lhote, H. 1985. Stations inédites de gravures rupestres au Hoggar. Dossiers et recherches sur l’Afrique 2: 153–61.Google Scholar
Limouzin, , (Capt.). 1951. La marche chez les Daouada. Bulletin de liaison saharienne, 5: 3031.Google Scholar
Lindblom, G. 1925. Jakt-och fångstmetoder bland Afrikanska folk: (with a retrospect in English). Stockholm: V. Pettersons.Google Scholar
Lotte, L. 1937. Coutumes des Imraguen (côtes de Mauritanie, AOF). Journal de la société des africanistes 7.1: 4151.Google Scholar
Lukas, J. 1952. Umrisse einer ostsaharanischen Sprachgruppe. Afrika und Ubersee 36: 37.Google Scholar
Lux, C. 2013. Le tetserrét, langue berbère du Niger: description phonétique, phonologique et morphologique, dans une perspective comparative. Berber Studies 38. Koln: Rudiger Koppe.Google Scholar
MacMichael, H. A. 1912. Notes on the Zaghawa and the people of Gebel Midob, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 42: 288344.Google Scholar
Maigret, J. 1985. Les Imraguen, pêcheurs des côtes de la Mauritanie: une technique ancestrale. Vémes rencontres internationale d’archéologie et d’histoire d’Antibes, 24, 25, 26 octobre 1984, Juan-les-Pins: Association pour la promotion et la diffusion des connaissances archéologiques, 205–14.Google Scholar
Maigret, J. and Abdallahi, A. O. 1976. La pêche des Imraguen sur le Banc d’Arguin et au Cap Timiris (Mauritanie): techniques et méthodes de pêche. Notes Africaines 149: 18.Google Scholar
Malášková, Z. and Blažek, V. 2012. Phoenician/Punic loans in Berber languages and their role in the chronology of Berber. Unpublished paper presented at the conference Rethinking Africa’s Transcontinental Continuities in Pre- and Protohistory. African Studies Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, 12–13 April 2012.Google Scholar
Masqueray, E. 1879. Comparaison d’un vocabulaire des Zenaga avec les vocabulaires correspondants des dialectes Chawia et des Beni Mzab. Archives des missions scientifiques et littéraires 3.5: 473533.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. (ed.). 2003. The Archaeology of Fazzān, Volume 1. Synthesis. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquities.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. (ed.). 2010. The Archaeology of Fazzān, Volume 3. Excavations of C. M. Daniels. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquities.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. J. (ed.). 2013. The Archaeology of Fazzān, Volume 4. Excavations at Old Jarma. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquities.Google Scholar
Milburn, M. 1988. Guanche: prehistoric inhabitants of Tenerife and possible African affinities. Africa: Rivista trimestrale di studi e documentazione dell’Istituto italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente 43.3: 475–81.Google Scholar
Monteil, C. 1939. La langue Azer. Publications du comité d’études historiques et scientifiques de l’Afrique Occidentale française série B.5: 213–41.Google Scholar
Moreno García, J. C. 2014. Invaders or just herders? Libyans in Egypt in the third and second millennia BCE. World Archaeology 46.4: 610–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukarovsky, H. G. 1964. Baskisch und Berberisch. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 59–60:5294.Google Scholar
Mukarovsky, H. G. 1969. Baskisch und Berberische Entsprechung. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 62: 3251.Google Scholar
Nicholas, F. 1953. La langue berbère de Mauritanie. Mémoire de l’IFAN 33. Dakar: IFAN.Google Scholar
Nicolaï, R. 1981. Les dialectes du songhay: contribution à l’étude des changements linguistiques. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Nicolaï, R. 2003. La force des choses, ou, l’épreuve ‘nilo-saharienne’: questions sur les reconstructions archéologiques et l’évolution des langues. Koln: Rudiger Koppe.Google Scholar
Nicolaï, R. 1990. Parentés linguistiques (à propos du songhay). Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Nicolaisen, I. 2010. Elusive Hunters: the Haddad of Kanem and the Bahr el Ghazal. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
O’Connor, M. 1996. The Berber scripts. In Bright, W. and Daniels, P. (eds), The World’s Writing Systems, New York: Oxford University Press, 112–16.Google Scholar
Paradisi, U. 1960. Il berbero du Augila (materiale lessicale). Rivisita degli Studi Orientali 35: 157–77.Google Scholar
Paradisi, U. 1963. Il linguaggio berbero di El-Fógǎha (Fezzân) (testi e materiale lessicale). Annali ns 13: 93126.Google Scholar
Park, D. P. 2010. Prehistoric Timbuktu and its hinterland. Antiquity 84: 1076–88.Google Scholar
Pauphilet, D. 1953. Les Daouada, In Bellair, P., Gobert, E. G., Jodot, P. and Pauphilet, D. (eds), Mission Au Fezzan, 1949. Publications scientifiques I, Tunis: Institut de hautes études de Tunis, 115–32.Google Scholar
Petráček, K. 1987. Berti or Sagato-a (Saharan) Vocabulary. Afrika und Übersee 70: 163–93.Google Scholar
Putten, M. V. 2013. A Grammar of Awjila Berber (Libya): Based on Umberto Paradisi’s Material, Unpublished PhD thesis, Leiden University, Leiden.Google Scholar
Segert, S. 1976. A Grammar of Phoenician and Punic. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. D. 1979. The camel in Roman North Africa and the Sahara: history, biology and human economy. Bulletin de l’Institut fondamental d’Afrique noire série B 41.4: 663721.Google Scholar
Skinner, N. 1996. Hausa Comparative Dictionary. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Souag, M. L. 2010. Grammatical Contact in the Sahara: Arabic, Berber, and Songhay in Tabelbala and Siwa. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, UK.Google Scholar
Souag, M. L. 2012. The subclassification of Songhay and its historical implications. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 33.2: 181213.Google Scholar
Souag, M. L. 2015. Explaining Korandje: language contact, plantations, and the trans-Saharan trade. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30.2: 189224.Google Scholar
Sudlow, D. 2009. Dictionary of the Tamasheq of North-East Burkina Faso. Köln: Rudiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Sznycer, Maurice 1967. Les passages puniques en transcription latine dans le Poenulus de Plaute. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Taine-Cheikh, C. 1979. Aperçus sur la situation sociolinguistique en Mauritanie. In Introduction à la Mauritanie. Centre de recherches et d’études sur les sociétés méditerranéennes, Centre d’études d’Afrique noire, Paris: Editions du CNRS, 169–73.Google Scholar
Taine-Cheikh, C. 2008. Dictionnaire Zénaga-français (berbère de Maurétanie). Köln: Rudiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Taine-Cheikh, C. 2010. Dictionnaire français-Zénaga (berbère de Maurétanie). Köln: Rudiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Taine-Cheikh, C. 2013. Des ethnies chimériques aux langues fantômes: l’exemple des Imraguen et Nemâdi de Mauritanie. In de Féral, C. (ed.), In and out of Africa: Languages in Question. In Honour of Robert Nicolaï. Vol. 1. Language Contact and Epistemological Issues, Leuven: Peeters, 137–64.Google Scholar
Topper, U. 1993. Einige Notizen zur berberischen Fischerbevölkerung am Atlantik. Almogaren 23: 151–69.Google Scholar
Trotignon, E. 1981. Données socio-économiques sur le village de pêcheurs Imraguen d’Iwik (Mauritanie). Bulletin de l’Institut fondamental d’Afrique noire série B 43.3–4: 319–60.Google Scholar
Tubiana, M. J. 1964. Survivances pré-islamiques en pays zaghawa. Paris: Université de Paris.Google Scholar
Tubiana, M. J. 1985. Des troupeaux et de femmes: mariage et transferts de biens chez les Beri (Zaghawa et Bideyat) du Tchad et du Soudan. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Tubiana, M. J. and Tubiana, J. 1977. The Zaghawa from an Ecological Perspective. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Tucker, B. 2003. Mikea origins: relicts or refugees? In Crossland, Z., Sodikoff, G. and Griffin, W. (eds), Lova/Inheritance – Past and Present in Madagascar. Discussions in Anthropology 14, Ann Arbor: Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 193215.Google Scholar
Vernet, R. and Onrubia-Pintado, J. 1994. La place des ancêtres de berbères dans le Sahara Néolithique. In Milieux, hommes et techniques du Sahara préhistorique, Paris: Harmattan, 5367.Google Scholar
Vernet, R., Otte, M., Tarrou, L., Gallin, A. and Géoris-Creuseveau, J. 2007. Fouille de la butte de FA 10 (Banc d’Arguin) et son apport à la connaissance de la culture épipaléolithique de Foum Arguin, nord-ouest du Sahara. Journal of African Archaeology 5.1: 1745.Google Scholar
Vycichl, W. 1952. Punischer Sprachinfluβ in Berberischen. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 11: 198204.Google Scholar
Walz, T. 1978. Trade Between Egypt and Bilād as-Sūdān 1700–1820. Cairo: IFAO.Google Scholar
Wellard, J. 1964. The Great Sahara. London: Hutchinson and Co.Google Scholar
Willms, A. 1980. Die dialektale Differenzierung des Berberishen. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Wölfel, D. J. 1955. Eurafrikanische Wortschichten als Kulturschichten. Acta Salmanticensia. Filosofía y letras, 9.1. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Wölfel, D. J. 1965. Monumenta linguae Canariae. Austria: Akademische Druck.Google Scholar
Wolff, E. and Alidou, H. 2001. On the non-linear ancestry of Tasawaq (Niger), or: how ‘mixed’ can a language be? In Nurse, D. (ed.), Historical Language Contact in Africa, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe, 523–74.Google Scholar
Worms, J. and Ould Eida, A. M. 2002. Les savoirs traditionnels des Imraguen, activités liées à la pêche. Nouakchott: Parc National du Banc d’Arguin.Google Scholar
Zeltner, J. C. 1970. Histoire des Arabes sur les rives du Lac Tchad. Annales de l’Université d’Abidjan, ethnosociologie 2.2: 112–79.Google Scholar
Zyhlarz, E. 1932. Die Sprache Numidiens. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 7: 275–80.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×