On the Legal and Economic Activities of Buddhist Nuns

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139044134.008

5 - On the Legal and Economic Activities of Buddhist Nuns

Two Examples from Early India

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014

Gregory Schopen

Edited by

Rebecca Redwood French and

Mark A. Nathan

Show author details

Rebecca Redwood French: Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Mark A. Nathan: Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Re-visioning the Indian Buddhist Nun as a “Legal Person”

One of the most obvious limitations of even recent work on the economics and business or corporate law of Buddhist monasticism in early India has been its almost exclusive focus on male monasticism, on male monasteries and monks. Nuns and nunneries have once again been overlooked or dropped between the cracks. There is, of course, no good reason for this, especially since it has been clear for some time from Buddhist inscriptional records that up until the Gupta period, at least, nuns were as active as donors at Buddhist sites as were monks, and must therefore have had very considerable means and economic presence. Even more recently it has also been noted that, although textually nuns may have been hierarchically or ritually subservient to monks, this had – according to at least one Vinaya or monastic code – no bearing on their legal or economic status: for this Vinaya, nuns had equal legal rights of ownership and economic independence. This same Vinaya, the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya, or closely related texts, moreover, deals with nuns who engage in a wide range of business enterprises, both licit and – according to the male authors of this code – illicit, and who have at their disposal and use a series of sophisticated financial instruments. A comprehensive, detailed survey of all of this would be, of course, of considerable interest and importance for any future view of the Indian Buddhist nun, but such a survey is hardly possible now, and certainly not here. The investigation of these issues has just begun; the sources we must use are in some disarray and more often than not very difficult, and the basic legal vocabulary is barely understood. Here, then, we can only make a start on two topics that will come to form a part of any such future survey: the use of negotiable promissory notes by Buddhist nuns, and their involvement in lending on interest funds that they held as permanent endowments. These two topics alone will amply illustrate the difficulties involved in pursuing these kinds of investigations, and will all too elegantly reveal how very far we have yet to go.

Type: Chapter
Information: Buddhism and Law
An Introduction
, pp. 91 - 114

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139044134.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Schopen, G., Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still More Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Kieffer-Pülz, P.’s contribution entitled “Die buddhistische Gemeinde” in Der Buddhismus I. Der indische Buddhismus und seine Verzweigungen (Die Religionen der Menschheit, Bd. 24, 1), Bechert, H. et al. (Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 2000), 302–03Google Scholar

Schopen, G., “Separate but Equal: Property Rights and the Legal Independence of Buddhist Nuns and Monks in Early North India,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 128 (2008), 625–40Google Scholar

Schopen, G., “The Urban Buddhist Nun and a Protective Rite for Children in Early North India,” in Straube, M. et al. (eds.), Pāsādikadānaṁ. Festschrift für Bhikkhu Pāsādika, Indica et Tibetica 52 (Marburg: Indica et Tibetica Verlag, 2009), 375–77Google Scholar

Roerich, Y.N., Tibetan-Russian-English Dictionary (Moscow: Nauka Publishers, 1985), vol. III, 70Google Scholar

Yisun, Zhang, et al., Bod rgya tshig mdzod chen mo (Beijing: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 1985), 779Google Scholar

Takeuchi, T., Old Tibetan Contracts from Central Asia (Tokyo: Daizo Shuppan, 1995), 49Google Scholar

Dutt, N., Gilgit Manuscripts, vol. III, Pt. 2 (Srinagar: The Calcutta Oriental Press, 1942)Google Scholar

The Tibetan Tripitaka. Taipei Edition ed. Barber, A.W. (Taipei: SMC Publishing Inc, 1991)

Garner, B.A., Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed. (St. Paul: West Group, 1999), 1058Google Scholar

Schopen, G., “On Emptying Chamber Pots without Looking and the Urban Location of Buddhist Nunneries in Early India Again,” Journal Asiatique 296 (2008), 231–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Herrman-Pfandt, A., Die Lhan Kar Ma. Ein früher Katalog der ins Tibetische übersetzten buddhistischen Texte (Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2008)Google Scholar

Oldenberg, H., The Vinaya Piṭaka (London: Williams and Norgate, 1882)Google Scholar

(Horner, I.B.’s translation of the text is less clear than it might be because she renders the difficult and uncommon ussayavādikā as “one who speaks in envy,” The Book of the Discipline), (London: Oxford University Press, 1942), vol. III, 177–81Google Scholar

Cone, M., A Dictionary of Pāli (Oxford: 2001), Pt. 1, 516Google Scholar

Nolot, É., Règles de discipline des nonnes bouddhistes (Paris: Collège de France, 1991), 88–92Google Scholar

Heirman, A., ‘The Discipline in Four Parts’: Rules for Nuns according to the Dharmaguptakavinaya (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 2002), Pt. 2, 331–35Google Scholar

Nolot, É., “Textes de discipline bouddhique. Les Sūtra-Vibhaṅga ou ‘Classification des sūtra,’” in Balbir, N. (ed.), Genres litteraires en Inde (Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle, 1994), 103–22Google Scholar

Tsomo, K.L., Sisters in Solitude: Two Traditions in Buddhist Monastic Ethics for Women (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996), 85Google Scholar

Rockhill, W.W., “Le Traité d’Émancipation ou Pratimoksha Sutra traduit du tibétain,” Revue de l’histoire des religions 9.1 (1884), 15

Waldschmidt, E., Bruchstücke des Bhikṣuṇī-Prātimokṣa der Sarvāstivādins. Mit einer Darstellung der Überlieferung des Bhikṣuṇī-Prātimokṣa in den verschiedenen Schulen (Leipzig: Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft, 1926), 87Google Scholar

Sankrityayana, R., Vinayasūtra of Bhadanta Gunaprabha (Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1981)Google Scholar

Burgess, J., Report on the Buddhist Cave Temples and Their Inscriptions Archaeological Survey of Western India vol. IV (London: Trübner, 1883), 93Google Scholar

Sadakata, A., “Japanese Translation of Junnar Inscriptions” (in Japanese), The Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters Tokai University 48 (1987), 211Google Scholar

Tsukamoto, K., Indo bukkyō himei no kenkyū [A Comprehensive Study of the Indian Buddhist Inscriptions] Pts. I and II (in Japanese) (Kyoto: Heirakuji-Shoten Ltd., 1996–98), 411Google Scholar

Law, B.C., “Bhikshunis in Indian Inscriptions,” Epigraphia Indica 25 (1939–40), 31–34Google Scholar

Nagaraju, S., Buddhist Architecture of Western India (c. 250 BC– AD 300) (Delhi: Agam Kala Prakashan, 1981)Google Scholar

Sircar, D.C., Indian Epigraphical Glossary (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1966), 149Google Scholar

Thakur, U., “The First Coins: A Study in Evolution and Growth,” in Sircar, D.C. (ed.), Early Indian Indigenous Coins (Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1971), 21–47Google Scholar

Bopearachchi, O. and Pieper, W., Ancient Indian Coins (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998) 7–174)Google Scholar

Kosambi, D.D., “Dhenukākaṭa,” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bombay 30.2 (1955), 53Google Scholar

Burgess, J., “Report on the Elura Cave Temples and the Brahmanical and Jaina Caves in Western India,” Archaeological Survey of Western India vol. V (London: Trübner, 1883) 83Google Scholar

Slusser, M.S., Nepal Mandala. A Cultural Study of the Kathmandu Valley (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Riccardi, T., “Buddhism in Ancient and Early Medieval Nepal,” in Studies in History of Buddhism ed. Narain, A.K. (Delhi: B. R. Publishing Corporation, 1980), 265–81Google Scholar

Regmi, D.R., Inscriptions of Ancient Nepal (New Delhi: Abhinav Publications, 1983)Google Scholar

Gadre, A.S., “Five Vala Copper-plate Grants,” Journal of the University of Bombay 3 (1934), 74–91Google Scholar

Misra, B., Orissa under the Bhauma Kings [Calcutta: The Vishwamitra Press, 1934], 40–50)Google Scholar

Singh, U., Kings, Brāhmaṇas and Temples in Orissa: An Epigraphic Study AD 300–1147 (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1994), 254Google Scholar

Davidson, R.M., Indian Esoteric Buddhism: A Social History of the Tantric Movement (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002), 91–98Google Scholar

Oldenberg, H., The Vinaya Piṭakaṃ (London: Williams and Norgate, 1882)Google Scholar

Bareau, A., Les sectes bouddhiques du petit véhicule (Paris: École Française d’Extrême-Orient, 1955), 127Google Scholar

Gernet, J., Les aspects économiques du bouddhisme dans la société chinoise du Ve au Xe siècle (Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient, 1956), 154–62Google Scholar

Ch’en, K.K.S., for example, covers some of this same material, but does not always say the same thing – see, The Chinese Transformation of Buddhism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973)Google Scholar

Derrett, J.D.M., “Nīvī,” Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal 12 (1974), 89–90Google Scholar

Maity, S.K., Economic Life in Northern India in the Gupta Period (Cir. A. D. 300–580), rev. 2nd ed. (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1970), 36–42Google Scholar

Hubbard, J., Absolute Delusion, Perfect Buddhahood. The Rise and Fall of a Chinese Heresy (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2001), 151Google Scholar

Yamagiwa, N., “Ārāmika – Gardener or Park Keeper? One of the Marginals around the Buddhist Saṃgha,” in Buddhist and Indian Studies in Honour of Professor Sodo Mori (Hamamatsu: Kokusai Bukkyōto Kyōkai, 2002), 363–85Google Scholar

Schopen, G., “The Buddhist ‘Monastery’ and the Indian Garden: Aesthetics, Assimilations, and the Siting of Monastic Establishments,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 126 (2006), 487–88Google Scholar

Kieffer-Pülz, P., “Stretching the Vinaya Rules and Getting Away with It,” Journal of the Pali Text Society 29 (2007), 1–51Google Scholar

Chatterjee, H., The Law of Debt in Ancient India (Calcutta: Sanskrit College, 1971), 21Google Scholar

von Hinüber, O., “Everyday Life in an Ancient Indian Buddhist Monastery,” Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 9 (2006), 20 n. 53Google Scholar

Jinananda, B., Abhisamācārikā (Patna: K.P. Jayaswal Research Institute, 1969), 127.14Google Scholar

Gnoli, R., The Gilgit Manuscript of the Śayanāsanavastu and Adhikaraṇavastu, Serie Orientale Roma 50, (Rome: Istituto per il Medio ed Estremo Oriento, 1978), 39.4Google Scholar

Schopen, G., “The Buddhist Nun as an Urban Landlord and a ‘Legal Person’ in Early India,” in Feller, D. et al. (eds.), Denadattīyam: Johannes Bronkhorst Felicitation Volume (Bern: Peter Lang, 2011), 627–42Google Scholar