Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contenst
- List of Illustrations
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Dedication
- Introduction
- Part I The Irish Revolution, 1916–23
- Part II The Restless Dominion, 1923–39
- 5 British Images of Ireland
- 6 The Cosgrave Years
- 7 The de Valera Challenge
- 8 England's Back Door
- Part III War and Neutrality, 1939–45
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
6 - The Cosgrave Years
from Part II - The Restless Dominion, 1923–39
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contenst
- List of Illustrations
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Dedication
- Introduction
- Part I The Irish Revolution, 1916–23
- Part II The Restless Dominion, 1923–39
- 5 British Images of Ireland
- 6 The Cosgrave Years
- 7 The de Valera Challenge
- 8 England's Back Door
- Part III War and Neutrality, 1939–45
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The evolution of the Irish Free State after 1923 offered support to each of the conflicting British images of Ireland. On the one hand, the new state experienced eight years of remarkable political stability. The pro-Treaty party, Cumann na nGaedheal, remained in government throughout this period, under the leadership of William T. Cosgrave. It was cautious in its nation building, placing pragmatism before idealism, because its priority was to restore economic, financial and social order after a decade of revolutionary upheaval. Irish ministers avoided radical economic reform, incorporated existing institutions into the new state and accepted assistance from the British imperial authorities. Kevin O'Higgins famously remarked that ‘we were probably the most conservative revolutionaries that ever put across a successful revolution’. Moreover, due to the bitterness engendered by the Civil War, they were implacably opposed to the republican movement and committed to working within the framework of the Anglo-Irish Treaty. Developments appeared to support the British liberal imperialist expectation that the Free State would settle down to a peaceful existence as a loyal, co-operative Dominion within the empire.
Yet there were dissenting voices within the Free State. Although reeling from defeat in the Civil War, the republican movement maintained a latent strength. Its underground army had not gone away. The new IRA Chief of Staff, Frank Aiken, made this plain in his instructions to officers on 28 May 1923, five days after the cessation of hostilities:
We joined the I.R.A. and enlisted men to firmly establish the Republic of Ireland. We fought for that, our comrades died for it. Until we reach that object it is our duty to push towards it, using at every moment the means at our disposal best suited to achieve our purpose … The dumping of arms does not mean that the usefulness of the I.R.A. is past, or release any member of it from his duty to his country. On the contrary, a disciplined Volunteer force, ready for any emergency, will be a great source of strength to the nation in its march to Independence. It is clearly our duty to keep the Army Organisation intact.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- British Spies and Irish RebelsBritish Intelligence and Ireland, 1916–1945, pp. 175 - 214Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2008