Book contents
- Brahms in Context
- Brahms in Context
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Music Examples
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Personality, People and Places
- Part II Identities, Environments and Influences
- Part III Performance and Publishing
- Part IV Society and Culture
- Part V Reception and Legacy
- Further Reading
- Index
- References
Part V - Reception and Legacy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2019
Book contents
- Brahms in Context
- Brahms in Context
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Music Examples
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I Personality, People and Places
- Part II Identities, Environments and Influences
- Part III Performance and Publishing
- Part IV Society and Culture
- Part V Reception and Legacy
- Further Reading
- Index
- References
Summary
The reception of Brahms’s music beyond his home city of Hamburg began in 1853, when the young composer made his first extended journey and presented his compositions to some of the leading figures of German contemporary music: Robert Schumann, Robert Franz and Franz Liszt. Each reacted to these unpublished works in distinctive ways.
Robert Schumann, with whom Brahms spent the whole month of October in Düsseldorf,was instantly enthralled.
Keywords
BrahmscontextreceptionGermanySchumannLeipzigBerlinLisztFranzBrahmscontextreceptionEnglandSchumannJoachimStanfordMannsHalléDaviesBrahmscontextanalysisSchoenbergconservativeprogressiveSchubringRiemannSchenkertheoryBrahmscontextNational SocialismGermanyWorld WarHitlerconcertreceptionBrahmscontexteditingscorephilologycompositionperformancesketchengravingBrahmscontextreceptionrecordingcanoncriticismperformancestyleBrahmscontexthistorical performancestyleinstrumentsrecordingBrahmscontextcompositionmodelquotationKagelLigetiGlanertRihmBrahmscontextmythbiographyHamburgprogressiveconservativewomenfilmfiction
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Brahms in Context , pp. 305 - 392Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Further Reading
Calella, M., ‘Gattung und Erwartung: Brahms, das Leipziger Gewandhaus und der Misserfolg des Klavierkonzerts Op. 15’, Ad Parnassum 2/3 (2004), 31–60Google Scholar
Horstmann, A., Untersuchungen zur Brahms-Rezeption der Jahre 1860–1880 (Hamburg, K. D. Wagner, 1986)Google Scholar
Meurs, N., Neue Bahnen? Aspekte der Brahms-Rezeption 1853–1868 (Cologne: Studio, 1996)Google Scholar
Romberg, U., ‘Zur Geschichte der Brahms-Rezeption im deutschsprachigen Raum’, Beiträge Zur Musikwissenschaft 29/1 (1987), 49–58Google Scholar
Siegmund-Schultze, U., ‘Zur Geschichte der Brahms-Rezeption im deutschsprachigen Raum von 1853 bis 1914’, PhD dissertation, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg (1982)Google Scholar
Neue Zeitschrift für Musik: https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Neue_Zeitschrift_f%C3%BCr_MusikGoogle Scholar
Further Reading
de Val, D., ‘Fanny Davies: “A Messenger for Schumann and Brahms”?’, in Ellsworth, T. & Wollenberg, S. (eds.), The Piano in Nineteenth-Century British Culture. Instruments, Performers and Repertoire (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 217–37Google Scholar
Musgrave, M. (ed.), George Grove, Music and Victorian Culture (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)Google Scholar
Musgrave, M., ‘Brahms and England’, in Musgrave, M. (ed.), Brahms 2. Biographical, Documentary and Analytical Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 1–20Google Scholar
Pascall, R., ‘Frühe Brahms-Rezeption in England’, in Fuchs, I. (ed.), Internationaler Brahms-Kongress Gmunden 1997 (Tuzting: Hans Schneider, 2001), 293–327Google Scholar
Woodhouse, E. L. A., ‘The Music of Johannes Brahms in Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century England and an Assessment of His Reception and Influence on the Chamber and Orchestral Works of Charles Hubert Hastings Parry and Charles Villiers Stanford’, PhD dissertation, Durham University (2013)Google Scholar
Further Reading
The complete bibliographic information for all pre-2008 publications referenced in this article is in Platt, H., Johannes Brahms. A Research and Information Guide, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2011)
Karnes, K., ‘Another Look at Critical Partisanship in the Viennese fin de siècle: Schenker’s Reviews of Brahms’s Vocal Music, 1891–92’, 19th-Century Music 26/1 (Summer 2002), 73–93Google Scholar
Knorr, I., Riemann, H., Sittard, J., and Morin, A., Johannes Brahms: Symphonien und andere Orchesterwerke (Berlin: Schlesinger’sche Buch und Musikhandlung, n.d.)Google Scholar
Lewin, D., ‘A Formal Theory of Generalized Tonal Functions’, Journal of Music Theory 26/1 (Spring 1982), 43–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, H., ‘Text-Music Relationships in the Lieder of Johannes Brahms’, PhD dissertation, Graduate Center of the City University of New York (1992)Google Scholar
Platt, H. and Smith, P. (eds.) Expressive Intersections in Brahms: Essays in Analysis and Meaning (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Pomeroy, B., ‘The Major Dominant in Minor-Mode Sonata Forms: Compositional Challenges, Complications and Effects’, Journal of Schenkerian Studies 5 (2011), 75–89Google Scholar
Riemann, H., ‘Johannes Brahms (geb. 7. Mai 1833 zu Hamburg, gest. 3. April 1897 zu Wien)’, reprinted in Präludien und Studien III: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Ästhetik, Theorie und Geschichte der Musik, 3 vols. (Leipzig: H. Seemann Nachfolger, 1901; rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1967), vol. 3, 215–23Google Scholar
Riemann, H., ‘Die Taktfreiheiten in Brahms’ Liedern’, Die Musik (Berlin) 12/1 (October 1912), 10–21Google Scholar
Rings, S., Tonality and Transformation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), Chapter 6Google Scholar
Rohringer, S., ‘Zu Johannes Brahms’ Intermezzo h-Moll op. 119/1’, Zeitschrift für Musiktheorie 10/1 (2013), www.gmth.de/zeitschrift/artikel/707.aspxGoogle Scholar
Schoenberg, A., ‘Brahms the Progressive’, reprinted in Stein, L. (ed.) Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg, trans. L. Black, (1975; rpt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), 398–441Google Scholar
Further Reading
Arndt, P. et al (eds.), Das ‘Reichs-Brahmsfest’ 1933 in Hamburg: Rekonstruktion und Dokumentation (Hamburg: Von Bockel, 1997)Google Scholar
Beller-McKenna, D., ‘Beyond the End’, Brahms and the German Spirit (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004), 165–94Google Scholar
Dümling, A., Verteidigung des musikalischen Fortschritts: Brahms und Schönberg (Hamburg: Argument, 1990)Google Scholar
von der Linn, M., ‘Themes of Nostalgia and Critique in Weimar-Era Brahms Reception’, in Brodbeck, D. (ed.), Brahms Studies 3 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2001), 231–48Google Scholar
Moseley, R., ‘Brief Immortality: Recasting History in the Music of Brahms’, PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley (2004)Google Scholar
Notley, M., ‘Brahms as Liberal: Genre, Style, and Politics in Late Nineteenth-Century Vienna’, 19th-Century Music 17/2 (Autumn 1993), 107–23Google Scholar
Podschun, A., ‘“Hüte dich nur und bewahre deine Seele wohl” – Der “Tag von Potsdam” und der dritte der Fest- und Gedenksprüche von Johannes Brahms’, Brahms-Studien 17 (2014), 29–50Google Scholar
Romberg, U., ‘Zur Geschichte der Brahms-Rezeption im deutschsprachigen Raum’, Beiträge zur Musikwissenschaft 29/1 (1987), 49–58Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Johannes Brahms: Ein Versuch über die musikalische Selbstreflexion (Wilhelmshaven: Noetzel, 2000)Google Scholar
Further Reading
Behr, J. and Kirsch, K., ‘Ein bislang unbekannter Korrekturabzug zum 2. Klavierkonzert op. 83 von Johannes Brahms’, in Goltz, M., Sandberger, W. and Wiesenfeld, C. (eds.), Spätphase(n)? Johannes Brahms’ Werke der 1880er und 1890er Jahre (Munich: Henle, 2010), 157–69Google Scholar
Kirsch, K., Von der Stichvorlage zum Erstdruck. Zur Bedeutung von Vorabzügen bei Johannes Brahms (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2013)Google Scholar
Kirsch, K., ‘Korrekturphase – Erprobungsphase. Zur Werkentstehung zwischen Redaktion und Interpretation am Beispiel ausgewählter Korrektur- und Aufführungsabzüge von Johannes Brahms’ Werken’, in Krämer, U., Raab, A. et al. (eds.), Das Autograph – Fluch und Segen. Probleme und Chancen für die musikwissenschaftliche Edition (Mainz: Schott, 2015), 167–90Google Scholar
Krummacher, F., Struck, M. et al. (eds.), Johannes Brahms. Quellen – Text – Rezeption – Interpretation (Munich: Henle, 1999)Google Scholar
Oechsle, S., Struck, M. and Eich, K. (eds.), Brahms am Werk. Konzepte – Texte – Prozesse (Munich: Henle, 2016)Google Scholar
Pascall, R., ‘Brahms and the Definitive Text’, in Pascall, R. (ed.), Brahms: Biographical, Documentary and Analytical Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 59–75Google Scholar
Pascall, R., ‘The Editor’s Brahms’, in Musgrave, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Brahms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 250–67Google Scholar
Struck, M., ‘Progression und Regression: Vom Quellenwert der Autographe für die Edition Brahms’scher Werke’, in Krämer, U., Raab, A. et al. (eds.), Das Autograph – Fluch und Segen. Probleme und Chancen für die musikwissenschaftliche Edition. (Mainz: Schott, 2015), 143–66Google Scholar
Struck, M. and Eich, K., ‘Zur Edition der Musik von Johannes Brahms’, in Emans, R. and Krämer, U. (eds.), Musikeditionen im Wandel der Geschichte (Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, 2015), 564–83Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bazzana, K., Glenn Gould: The Performer in the Work (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Chanan, M., Repeated Takes: A Short History of Recording and Its Effects on Music (London: Verso, 1995)Google Scholar
Kraus, D., ‘De Mortuis Nihil Nisi Bene: Anmerkungen zu Glenn Goulds Einspielungen der Klaviermusik von Johannes Brahms’, Brahms-Studien 9 (1992), 23–8Google Scholar
Philip, R., ‘Brahms’s musical world: Balancing the evidence’, in Musgrave, M. and Sherman, B. (eds.), Performing Brahms: Early Evidence of Performing Style (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 349–72Google Scholar
Symes, C., Setting the Record Straight: A Material History of Classical Recording (Middletown CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Further Reading
Brown, C., Classical and Romanic Performing Practice 1750–1900 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Brown, C., Peres da Costa, N., Wadsworth, K., Performance Practices in Johannes Brahms’ Chamber Music (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2015)Google Scholar
Cai, C., ‘Brahms’s Pianos and the Performance of His Late Works’, Performance Practice Review 2/1 (Spring 1989), 58–72Google Scholar
Musgrave, M. and Sherman, B. (eds.), Performing Brahms: Early Evidence of Performing Style (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Pascall, R., Playing Brahms. A Study in 19th-Century Performing Practice (Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 1991)Google Scholar
Winter, R., ‘Orthodoxies, Paradoxes, and Contradictions; Performance Practices in Nineteenth-Century Piano Music’, in Todd, R. L. (ed.), Nineteenth-Century Piano Music, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge, 2004), 16–54Google Scholar
Further Reading
Burkholder, J. P., ‘Brahms and Twentieth-Century Classical Music’, 19th-Century Music 8/1 (Summer 1984), 75–83Google Scholar
Gallon, E., ‘Narrativities in the music of Thomas Adès: The Piano Quintet and Brahms’, in Klein, M. and Reyland, N. (eds.), Music and Narrative since 1900 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013), 216–33Google Scholar
Kagel, M., ‘Die missbrauchte Empfindsamkeit. Johannes Brahms zum 150. Geburtstag’, Worte über Musik. Gespräche, Aufsätze, Reden, Hörspiele (Munich: Piper, 1991), 174–83Google Scholar
Sandberger, W., ‘Bilder, Denkmäler, Konstruktionen – Johannes Brahms als Figur des kollektiven Gedächtnisses’, in Brahms Handbuch, 2–22Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A., ‘Brahms the Progressive’, reprinted in Stein, L. (ed.) Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg, trans. L. Black, (1975; rpt. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), 398–441Google Scholar
Further Reading
Avins, S., ‘The Young Brahms: Biographical Data Reexamined’, 19th-Century Music 24/3 (Spring 2001), 276–89Google Scholar
Hofmann, K., ‘Sehnsucht habe ich immer nach Hamburg …’: Johannes Brahms und seine Vaterstadt: Legende und Wirklichkeit (Reinbek: Dialog-Verlag, 2003)Google Scholar
Musgrave, M. ‘Frei aber Froh: A Reconsideration’, 19th-Century Music 3/3 (March 1980), 251–8Google Scholar
Swafford, J., ‘Did the Young Brahms Play Piano in Waterfront Bars?’, 19th-Century Music 24/3 (Spring 2001), 268–75Google Scholar