Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Life, Work and Influences of a ‘Master of Suspicion’
- 2 Theory of Practice: Field, Habitus, Capital
- 3 Bourdieu's Writings on Religion
- 4 Outline of a Theory of Religious Practice: Eternalizing the Arbitrary in Colonial New England
- 5 Using Bourdieu to Interpret Religion: Applications and Limitations
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Concise Glossary of Key Terms
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - Outline of a Theory of Religious Practice: Eternalizing the Arbitrary in Colonial New England
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Life, Work and Influences of a ‘Master of Suspicion’
- 2 Theory of Practice: Field, Habitus, Capital
- 3 Bourdieu's Writings on Religion
- 4 Outline of a Theory of Religious Practice: Eternalizing the Arbitrary in Colonial New England
- 5 Using Bourdieu to Interpret Religion: Applications and Limitations
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Concise Glossary of Key Terms
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This island of the sacred, ostentatiously opposed to the profane, everyday world of production, a sanctuary for gratuitous, disinterested activity, offers, like theology in other periods, an imaginary anthropology obtained by denial of all negations really performed by the ‘economy’
(Bourdieu 1990b, 134).Overview
Pierre Bourdieu conceives of the religious field as one of numerous distinct yet interrelated fields that together constitute human society. Fields are characterized and structured principally by the struggle or competition that takes place within them, as explained in Chapter 2. For Bourdieu (1987a, 126), the religious field is characterized by a ‘[c]ompetition for religious power [that] owes its specificity … to the fact that what is at stake is the monopoly of the legitimate exercise of the power to modify, in a deep and lasting fashion, the practice and worldview of lay people, by imposing on and inculcating in them a particular religious habitus’. Struggle in the religious field, furthermore, unfolds principally between the Church (Eglise) and its priests versus the prophet (or ‘heresiarch’) and his believers, or orthodoxy versus heterodoxy, over the production, administration and consumption of religious capital and the adherence of the laity to whom it is marketed. Bourdieu (1971a, 305) stresses that the Church's primary interest (an interest concealed by the Church's trademark use of euphemisms) is ‘the monopoly over the legitimate production of religious capital’ and the ‘institutionalization of their dominance in the religious field’.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bourdieu on ReligionImposing Faith and Legitimacy, pp. 81 - 106Publisher: Acumen PublishingPrint publication year: 2007