We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2022
CASE 1. ERICA’s IMPROVED BEER MARKET SOFTWARE
A.1. BASE CASE
Frank heads a major beer producing company. In the 1970s, he developed a computer programme which analyses regional patterns of beer distribution and beer consumption. Since then, he has constantly refined the programme and has freely distributed the programme to his traders, trade associations and market analysts. Over time, the programme became the standard instrument to analyse the beer market. Without using it, one cannot be active on this market. Therefore Erica, a former trader of Frank’s products and now director of a major competitor of Frank, started to model her own distribution system on Frank’s system. Does Frank have a right to an injunction arguing that the computer programme is his?
B.1. CASE MODIFICATION
Frank does license the programme to Erica under the obligation not to improve it and not to market the programme without his permission. Can Frank claim an injunction if Erica improves the programme and markets it without Frank’s prior consent?
CASE 2. MEDICAL RESEARCH (PUBLIC HEALTH – MODELLED ON BRCA1/2 AND CCR5)
A.1. CASE
Mary, owner of a small biotech company, was granted a patent on the gene BRAU-7. As a utility, the patent accounts for cardiovascular diseases. Five years after the patent was granted, her competitor John found out that the gene BRAU-7, in conjunction with the gene BLIB-5, is responsible for healing wounds.
The proportional relationship to which each gene accounts for the healing process is scientifically unclear. John is also granted a patent on his invention. He sets up a business and starts producing an ointment.
Does Mary have a claim for injunction against John?
CASE 3. CULTURE – THIRD PARTY ACCESS (MODELLED ON P2P FILE-SHARING)
A.1. BASE CASE
Carla, a 15-year-old teenager, downloads and uploads songs from the Internet and exchanges CDs with her girlfriend Karen. She is now sued by the record company ‘string’.
Will an injunction be granted ?
B.1. MODIFICATION
At the same time, ‘string’ is seeking an injunction against the Internet-based music provider ‘Keep Mov’n’, whose site has become the most popular music exchange site.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
