Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:26:07.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2019

Gordon Hull
Gordon Hull
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Biopolitics of Intellectual Property
Regulating Innovation and Personhood in the Information Age
 , pp. 199 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Aaker, D. A. (2011). Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 134 U.S. 2347 (2014).Google Scholar
Amoore, L. (2004). Risk, Reward and Discipline at Work. Economy and Society, 33(2), 174–196. doi:10.1080/03085140410001677111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AMP v. Myriad, 689 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2012).Google Scholar
AMP v. Myriad, 133 S. Ct. 2107 (2013).Google Scholar
AMP v. USPTO, 702 F. Supp. 2d 181 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).Google Scholar
Anten, T. (2006). Self-Disparaging Trademarks and Social Change: Factoring the Reappropriation of Slurs into Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act. Columbia Law Review, 106(2), 388–434.Google Scholar
Armstrong, H. W. (1985). Mystery of the Ages. Retrieved from www.thetrumpet.com/literature/books_and_booklets/730.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvidsson, A. (2004). On the “Pre-History of the Panoptic Sort”: Mobility in Market Research. Surveillance and Society, 1(4), 456–474.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, P., Milosevic, T., & Bello, B. (2015). The Impact of Copyright Permissions Culture on the US Visual Arts Community: The Consequences of Fear of Fair Uuse. New Media & Society 18(9), 2012–2027. doi:10.1177/1461444815575018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, H. J., Brawarsky, P., Murray, M. F., & Haas, J. S. (2010). Familial Risk of Cancer and Knowledge and Use of Genetic Testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(7), 717–724. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1334-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bair, S., & Pedraza-Fariña, L. (2018). Anti-Innovation Norms. Northwestern Law Review.Google Scholar
Baker, J. B. (2007). Beyond Schumpeter vs. Arrow: How Antitrust Fosters Innovation. Antitrust Law Journal, 74(3), 575–602.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M. (2004). Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society. New York University Law Review, 79(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
Bankhead, C. (2018, May 7). Genetic Test Criteria Often Miss Breast Cancer Risk. MedPage Today. Retrieved from www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/additionalmeetings/72742.Google Scholar
Barrett, B. (2015). Keurig’s My K-Cup Retreat Shows We Can Beat DRM. Wired. Retrieved from www.wired.com/2015/05/keurig-k-cup-drm/Google Scholar
Barron, A. (2010). Copyright Infringement, “Free-Riding” and the Lifeworld. In Bentley, L., Davis, J., & Ginsburg, J. C. (Eds.), Copyright and Piracy: An Interdisciplinary Critique (pp. 93–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartow, A. (2015). The Gender of Trademarks and Luxury Branding. In Sun, H., Beebe, B., & Sunder, M. (Eds.), The Luxury Economy and Intellectual Property (pp. 145–170). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1995). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. In Febrero, R. & Schwartz, P. S. (Eds.), The Essence of Becker (pp. 3–17). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (2007). Health as Human Capital: Synthesis and Extensions. Oxford Economic Papers, 59(3), 379–410. doi:10.1093/oep/gpm020.Google Scholar
Beebe, B. (2008). The Semiotic Account of Trademark Doctrine and Trademark Culture. In Dinwoodie, G. B. & Janis, M. D. (Eds.), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 42–62). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
Beebe, B. (2010). Intellectual Property Law and the Sumptuary Code. Harvard Law Review, 123, 809–889.Google Scholar
Beebe, B. (2014). The Suppressed Misappropriation Origins of Trademark Antidilution Law: The Landgericht Elberfeld’s Odol Opinion and Frank Schechter’s “The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection”. In Ginsburg, J. C. & Dreyfuss, R. C. (Eds.), Intellectual Property at the Edge: The Contested Contours of IP (pp. 59–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A., & Parchomovsky, G. (2005). A Theory of Property. Cornell Law Review, 90, 531–615.Google Scholar
Bellcross, C. A., Kolor, K., Goddard, K. A., Coates, R. J., Reyes, M., & Khoury, M. J. (2011). Awareness and Utilization of BRCA1/2 Testing among U.S. Primary Care Physicians. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(1), 61–66. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benkler, Y. (2000). An Unhurried View of Private Ordering in Information Transactions. Vanderbilt Law Review, 53, 2063–2080. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00121.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm. Yale Law Journal, 112, 370–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-Based Peer Production and Virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x.Google Scholar
Berardi, F. (2009). The Soul at Work: From Alienation to Autonomy (Cadel, F. & Mecchia, G.., Trans. Smith, J. E. Ed.). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Berlinguer, G. (2004). Bioethics, Health, and Inequality. Lancet, 364(9439), 1086–1091. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17066-9.Google Scholar
Bernstein, G. (2010). Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Gatekeeping the Production of Genetic Information. UMKC Law Review, 79(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
Bessière, J. (2002). Local Development and Heritage: Traditional Food and Cuisine as Tourist Attractions in Rural Areas. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 21–34. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00061.Google Scholar
Biebricher, T. (2014). Sovereignty, Norms, and Exception in Neoliberalism. qui parle, 23(1), 77–107.Google Scholar
Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010).Google Scholar
Binkley, S. (2009). The Work of Neoliberal Governmentality: Temporality and Ethical Substance in the Tale of Two Dads. Foucault Studies, 6, 60–78.Google Scholar
Binkley, S. (2014). Happiness as Enterprise: An Essay on Neoliberal Life. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Blewett, R. A. (1995). Property Rights as a Cause of the Tragedy of the Commons: Institutional Change and the Pastoral Maasai of Kenya. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(4), 477–490.Google Scholar
Bleyer, A., & Welch, H. G. (2012). Effect of Three Decades of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer Incidence. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(21), 1998–2005. doi:doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1206809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, A. (2012). Speaking “Truth” to Biopower. Southwestern University Law Review, 41, 241–252.Google Scholar
Bode, K. (2018). Once Again, Activists Must Beg the Government to Preserve the Right to Repair. vIce.com. Retrieved from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mbxzyv/dmca-1201-exemptions.Google Scholar
Boenink, M. (2010). Molecular Medicine and Concepts of Disease: The Ethical Value of a Conceptual Analysis of Emerging Biomedical Technologies. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 13(1), 11–23. doi:10.1007/s11019-009-9223-x.Google Scholar
Boenink, M. (2011). Unambiguous Test Results or Individual Independence? The Role of Clients and Families in Predictive BRCA-Testing in the Netherlands Compared to the USA. Social Science & Medicine, 72(11), 1793–1801. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bone, R. G. (1998). A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification. California Law Review, 86, 241–313.Google Scholar
Bone, R. G. (2008). Schechter’s Ideas in Historical Context and Dilution’s Rocky Road. Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal, 24, 469–506.Google Scholar
Borgmann, A. (1995). The Moral Significance of Material Culture. In Feenberg, A. & Hannay, A. (Eds.), Technology and the Politics of Knowledge (pp. 85–93). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Borgmann, A. (2010). Reality and Technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 27–35. doi:10.1093/cje/bep021 10.1093/cje/ben055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bork, R. H. (1993). The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Borry, P., & Howard, H. (2008). DTC Genetic Services: A Look across the Pond. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(6), 14–16. doi:10.1080/15265160802248252.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. (1997). Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. (2000). Cruel, Mean, or Lavish? Economic Analysis, Price Discrimination, and Digital Intellectual Property. Vanderbilt Law Review, 53, 2007–2039.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. (2008). The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bridgeport Music v. Dimension Films, 410 F.3d 792 (2005).Google Scholar
Brïdson, K., & Evans, J. (2004). The Secret to a Fashion Advantage is Brand Orientation. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 32(8), 403–411. doi:doi:10.1108/09590550410546223.Google Scholar
Bronk, R. (2013). Hayek on the Wisdom of Prices: A Reassessment. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 6(1), 82–107.Google Scholar
Brown, M. F. (2003). Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (2005). Neoliberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy. In Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics (pp. 37–59). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (2006). Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Bryant, R. L. (2013). Branding Natural Resources: Science, Violence and Marketing in the Making of Teak. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(4), 517–530. doi:10.1111/tran.12006.Google Scholar
Buck, D., Getz, C., & Guthman, J. (1997). From Farm to Table: The Organic Vegetable Commodity Chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis, 37(1), 3–20. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugos, G. E., & Kevles, D. J. (1992). Plants as Intellectual Property: American Practice, Law, and Policy in World Context. Osiris, 2nd series 7, 74–104.Google Scholar
Burk, D. L. (2014). The Curious Incident of the Supreme Court in Myriad Genetics. Notre Dame Law Review, 90(2), 505–542.Google Scholar
Burk, D. L. (2016). Beyond Abstraction: Applying the Brakes to Runaway Patent Ineligibility. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(3), 697–703. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsw055.Google Scholar
Burk, D. L., & Gillespie, T. (2006). Autonomy and Morality in DRM and Anti-Circumvention Law. tripleC, 4(2), 239-245.Google Scholar
Busch, L., & Tanaka, K. (1996). Rites of Passage: Constructing Quality in a Commodity Subsector. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21(1), 3–27. doi:10.1177/016224399602100101.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998). Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics. In Callon, M. (Ed.), The Laws of the Markets (pp. 1–58). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002). The Economy of Qualities. Economy and Society, 31(2), 194–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camargo, R., & Ried, N. (2016). Towards a Genealogy of Pharmacological Practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(1), 85–94. doi:10.1007/s11019-015-9648-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campeau, P. M., Foulkes, W. D., & Tischkowitz, M. D. (2008). Hereditary Breast Cancer: New Genetic Developments, New Therapeutic Avenues. Human Genetics, 124(1), 31–42. doi:10.1007/s00439-008-0529-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, A., Huang, L., & Shao, Z. (2017). The Preventive Intervention of Hereditary Breast Cancer. In Song, E. & Hu, H. (Eds.), Translational Research in Breast Cancer: Biomarker Diagnosis, Targeted Therapies and Approaches to Precision Medicine (pp. 41–57). Singapore: Springer Singapore.Google Scholar
Carere, D. A., Kraft, P., Kaphingst, K. A., Roberts, J. S., & Green, R. C. (2016). Consumers Report Lower Confidence in Their Genetics Knowledge Following Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing. Genetic Medicine, 18(1), 65–72. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.34.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. A., Katyal, S. K., & Riley, A. R. (2009). In Defense of Property. Yale Law Journal, 118, 1022–1125.Google Scholar
Caryn Rabin, R. (2018, March 6). F.D.A. Approves First Home Testing for Three Breast Cancer Mutations, With Caveats. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2018/03/06/well/fda-brca-home-testing.html.Google Scholar
Cassier, M., & Sinding, C. (2008). ‘Patenting in the Public Interest:’ Administration of Insulin Patents by the University of Toronto. History and Technology, 24(2), 153–171. doi:10.1080/07341510701810948.Google Scholar
Cervellon, M.-C. (2012). Victoria’s Dirty Secrets. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 133–145. doi:10.1080/00913367.2012.10672462.Google Scholar
Chander, A., & Sunder, M. (2004). The Romance of the Public Domain. California Law Review, 92, 1331–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, E. K. (2006). Structural Laws and the Puzzle of Regulating Behavior. Northwestern University Law Review, 100, 655–717.Google Scholar
Childers, C. P., Childers, K. K., Maggard-Gibbons, M., & Macinko, J. (2017). National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women with a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(34), 3800–3806. doi:10.1200/jco.2017.73.6314.Google Scholar
Chon, M. (2006). Intellectual Property and the Development Divide. Cardozo Law Review, 27, 2814–2904.Google Scholar
Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cochoy, F. (2002). Une sociologie du packaging, ou l’âne de Buridan face au marché. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cohen, F. S. (1932). The Subject Matter of Ethical Science. International Journal of Ethics, 42(4), 397–418.Google Scholar
Cohen, F. S. (1935). Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach. Columbia Law Review, 35(6), 809–849.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (1998). Lochner in Cyberspace: The New Economic Orthodoxy of ‘Rights Management’. Michigan Law Review, 97, 462–563.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (2007). Creativity and Culture in Copyright Theory. University of California, Davis Law Review, 40, 1151–1205.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. E. (2012). Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, S. J. (2009). Topologies of Power: Foucault’s Analysis of Political Government beyond ‘Governmentality’. Theory, Culture & Society, 26, 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, R. J. (1998). The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. (2008). Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Craig, C. J. (2019). Critical Copyright Law and the Politics of ‘IP’. In Christodoulidis, E., Dukes, R., & Goldoni, M. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Critical Legal Theory forthcoming. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Crouch, D., & Merges, R. P. (2010). Operating Efficiently Post-Bilski by Ordering Patent Doctrine Decision-making. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25, 1673–1692.Google Scholar
Davies, L., Petitti, D. B., Martin, L., Woo, M., & Lin, J. S. (2018). Defining, Estimating, and Communicating Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(1), 36–43. doi:10.7326/M18-0694.Google Scholar
Davies, W. (2011). The Political Economy of Unhappiness. New Left Review, 71(Sept-Oct), 65–80.Google Scholar
Davies, W. (2012). The Emerging Neocommunitarianism. The Political Quarterly, 83(4), 767–776. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02354.x.Google Scholar
Davies, W. (2014). The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, M. (2016). “It’s Not if I Get Cancer, It’s When I Get Cancer”: BRCA-Positive Patients’ (un)certain Health Experiences Regarding Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk. Social Science & Medicine, 163, 21–27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, M., & Davidson, L. G. (2016). Previvors’ Uncertainty Management Strategies for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Health Communication, 33(2), 122–130. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1250187.Google Scholar
Dean, O. (2006). Copyright in the Courts: The Return of the Lion. WIPO Magazine, (April). Retrieved from www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2006/02/article_0006.html.Google Scholar
Dekeuwer, C., & Bateman, S. (2013). Much More than a Gene: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Reproductive Choices and Family Life. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 16(2), 231–244. doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9361-9Google Scholar
Delfanti, A. (2017). Distributed Biotechnology. In Tyfield, D., Lave, R., Randalls, S., & Thorpe, C. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science, 237–48. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a Theory of Property Rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1969). Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint. The Journal of Law & Economics, 12(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (1970). The Private Production of Public Goods. The Journal of Law & Economics, 13(2), 293–306.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. (2008). From Economic Man to Economic System: Essays on Human Behavior and the Institutions of Capitalism. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, D. R. (2012). From Trademarks to Brands. Florida Law Review, 64, 981–1044.Google Scholar
Desai, D. R. (2015). The Chicago School Trap in Trademark: The Co-Evolution of Corporate, Antitrust, and Trademark Law. Cardozo Law Review, 37, 551–620.Google Scholar
Deselnicu, O. C., Costanigro, M., Souza-Monteiro, D. M., & Thilmany McFadden, D. (2013). A Meta-Analysis of Geographical Indication Food Valuation Studies: What Drives the Premium for Origin-Based Labels? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 38(2), 204–219.Google Scholar
Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).Google Scholar
Dilts, A. (2011). From ‘Entrepreneur of the Self’ to ‘Care of the Self:’ Neo-liberal Governmentality and Foucault’s Ethics. Foucault Studies, 12(October), 130–146.Google Scholar
Domchek, S. M., Bradbury, A., Garber, J. E., Offit, K., & Robson, M. E. (2013). Multiplex Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility: Out on the High Wire Without a Net? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(10), 1267–1270. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.46.9403Google Scholar
Domchek, S. M., Friebel, T. M., Singer, C. F. et al. (2010). Association of Risk-Reducing Surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers with Cancer Risk and Mortality. JAMA, 304(9), 967–975. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1237Google Scholar
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, R. C. (1990). Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation. Notre Dame Law Review, 65, 397–424.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, R. C. (2002). Commodifying Collaborative Research. In Elkin-Koren, N. & Netanel, N. W. (Eds.), The Commodification of Information (pp. 397–413). The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Easton, D. F. (1999). How Many More Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes are There? Breast Cancer Research, 1(1), 14–17.Google Scholar
Elden, S. (2016). Foucault’s Last Decade. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003).Google Scholar
Elkin-Koren, N. (2002). It’s All About Control: Rethinking Copyright in the New Information Landscape. In Elkin-Koren, N. & Netanel, N. W. (Eds.), The Commodification of Information (pp. 79–106). The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Enoch, D., & Fisher, T. (2015). Sense and “Sensitivity:” Epistemic and Instrumental Approaches to Statistical Evidence. Stanford Law Review, 67, 557–611.Google Scholar
Enoch, D., Spectre, L., & Fisher, T. (2012). Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40(3), 197–224. doi:10.1111/papa.12000.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. (2002). The Allocation of the Commons: Parking on Public Roads. The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S2), S515–S544. doi:10.1086/342023Google Scholar
Ewald, F. (1990). Norms, Discipline, and the Law. Representations, (30), 138–161. doi:10.2307/2928449Google Scholar
Fallon, R. H. Jr. (1994). Two Senses of Autonomy. Stanford Law Review, 46, 875–905.Google Scholar
Fennell, L. A. (2012). Lumpy Property. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 160, 1955–1993.Google Scholar
Finch, A., Evans, G., & Narod, S. A. (2012). BRCA Carriers, Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Menopause: Clinical Management Considerations and Recommendations. Womens Health (Lond Engl), 8(5), 543–555. doi:10.2217/whe.12.41Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, D. (2006). Evolution and Chaos in Property Rights Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access. Yale Law Journal, 115, 996–1048.Google Scholar
Flurry, S. (2006). Raising the Ruins. Retrieved from www.thetrumpet.com/literature/books_and_booklets/967.Google Scholar
Foster, R. J. (2007). The Work of the New Economy: Consumers, Brands, and Value Creation. Cultural Anthropology, 22, 707–731.Google Scholar
Foster, R. J. (2008). Commodities, Brands, Love, and Kula. Anthropological Theory, 8(1), 9–25. doi:10.1177/1463499607087492.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (Smith, A. M. S., Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1975[1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. In Dreyfus, H. L. & Rabinow, P. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984a). The Politics of Health in the Eighteenth Century (Porter, C., Trans.). In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 273–289). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984b). What is an Author? In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 101–120). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1988a). The History of Sexuality (Hurley, R., Trans. Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1988b). Technologies of the Self. In Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, 16–49. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994a). The Birth of Social Medicine. In Faubion, J. J. (Ed.), Power (pp. 134–156). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994b). Truth and Juridical Forms. In J. J. Faubion (Ed.), Power (pp. 1–89). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (Macey, D., Trans.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004). The Crisis of Medicine or the Crisis of Antimedicine. Foucault Studies, 1, 5–19.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978 (Burchell, G., Trans. Senellart, M. Ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (Burchell, G., Trans. Senellart, M. Ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2012). The Mesh of Power. Viewpoint Magazine, 2. Retrieved from www.viewpointmag.com/2012/09/12/the-mesh-of-power/.Google Scholar
Freidberg, S. (2004). French Beans and Food Scares: Culture and Commerce in an Anxious Age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frischmann, B. M. (2007). Evaluating the Demsetzian Trend in Copyright Law. Review of Law & Economics, 3, 649–677).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frischmann, B. M., & Lemley, M. A. (2006). Spillovers. Columbia Law Review, 100, 101–143.Google Scholar
Frischmann, B. M., & Selinger, E. (2018). Re-Engineering Humanity. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
FTC v. Actavis, 570 U.S. 136 (2013).Google Scholar
Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948).Google Scholar
Galkina Cleary, E., Beierlein, J. M., Khanuja, N. S., McNamee, L. M., & Ledley, F. D. (2018). Contribution of NIH Funding to New Drug Approvals 2010–2016. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(10), 2329. doi:10.1073/pnas.1715368115.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. (2012). Knowing the Essence of the State in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(1), 50–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00512.xGoogle Scholar
Giannakeas, V., & Narod, S. A. (2018). The Expected Benefit of Preventive Mastectomy on Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality in BRCA Mutation Carriers, by Age at Mastectomy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 167(1), 263–267. doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4476-1Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (2007). Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in Intellectual Property Law. Yale Law Journal, 116, 882–951.Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2007). Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, T. (2010). The Politics of ‘Platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. doi:10.1177/1461444809342738Google Scholar
Gold, E. R., & Carbone, J. (2010). Myriad Genetics: In the Eye of the Policy Storm. Genetic Medicine, 12(1s), S39–S70.Google Scholar
Golder, B., & Fitzpatrick, P. (Eds.). (2010). Foucault’s Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Golder, B., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2010). Foucault and Law: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Goodrich, P., Katyal, S. K., & Tushnet, R. (2013). Critical Legal Studies in Intellectual Property and Information Law Scholarship. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 31, 601–623.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. J. (2008). Moral Philosophy, Information Technology, and Copyright: The Grokster Case. In Hoven, J. v. d. & Weckert, J. (Eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy (pp. 270–300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goswami, N. (2008). Autophagia and Queer Transnationality: Compulsory Heteroimperial Masculinity in Deepa Mehta’s Fire. Signs, 33(2), 343–369. doi:10.1086/521052Google Scholar
Grand Upright Music, Ltd v. Warner Bros. Records Inc., 780 F. Supp. 182 (SDNY 1991).Google Scholar
Grimmelmann, J. (2009). The Ethical Visions of Copyright Law. Fordham Law Review, 77, 2005–2037.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, F. S., & Tavani, H. T. (2010). Appying the ‘Contextual Integrity’ Model of Privacy to Personal Blogs in the Blogosphere. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3(2), 38–47.Google Scholar
Guo, F., Hirth, J. M., Lin, Y. L., Richardson, G., Levine, L., Berenson, A. B., & Kuo, Y. F. (2017). Use of BRCA Mutation Test in the U.S., 2004–2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(6), 702–709. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.027Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1986). Making Up People. In Heller, T. C., Sosna, M., & Welleby, D. E. (Eds.), Reconsructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technoloy, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 149–182). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harcourt, B. E. (2011). The Illusion of Free Markets. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hébert, K. (2010). In Pursuit of Singular Salmon: Paradoxes of Sustainability and the Quality Commodity. Science as Culture, 19(4), 553–581. doi:10.1080/09505431.2010.519620Google Scholar
Heller, M. A. (1998). The Tragedy of the Anti-Commons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review, 111, 621–688.Google Scholar
Hemmungs Wirtén, E. (2008). Terms of Use: Negotiating the Jungle of the Intellectual Commons. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hemmungs Wirtén, E. (2015). The Patent and the Paper: a Few Thoughts on Late Modern Science and Intellectual Property. Culture Unbound, 7, 600–609.Google Scholar
Herz, M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2013). Activation of Country Stereotypes: Automaticity, Consonance, and Impact. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(4), 400–417. doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0318-1Google Scholar
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 111–145.Google Scholar
Hetcher, S. A. (2009). Hume’s Penguin, or, Yochai Benkler and the Nature of Peer Production. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 11, 963–1000.Google Scholar
Heymann, L. A. (2005). The Birth of the Authornym: Authorship, Pseudonymity, and Trademark Law. Notre Dame Law Review, 80, 1377–1449.Google Scholar
Hobart, M. E., & Schiffman, Z. S. (1998). Information Ages: Literacy, Numeracy and the Computer Revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1971). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England (Cropsey, J. Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, D. A., & Mehra, S. K. (2009). Wikitruth through Wikiorder. Emory Law Journal, 59, 152–-209.Google Scholar
hooks, b. (1999). Eating the Other. In Black Looks: Race and Representation (pp. 21–40). Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, H. (2015). The Rule of Reason and the Scope of the Patent. San Diego Law Review, 52, 515–554.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, H. (2018). Reasonable Patent Exhaustion. Yale Journal of Regulation, 35(2), 513–548.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. (2006). Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon: The Spirited Debate about Geographical Indications. Hastings Law Journal, 58, 299–386.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2003a). Digital Copyright and the Possibility of Pure Law. qui parle, 14, 21–47.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2003b). Thoughts on the Fetishization of Cyberspeech and the Turn from ‘Public’ to ‘Private’ Law. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 10(1), 113–134.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2009a). Clearing the Rubbish: Locke, the Waste Proviso, and the Moral Justification of Intellectual Property. Public Affairs Quarterly, 23, 67–93.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2009b). Hobbes and the Making of Modern Political Thought. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2009c). Overblocking Autonomy: The Case of Mandatory Library Filtering Software. Continental Philosophy Review, 42(1), 81–100. doi:10.1007/s11007-009-9097-x.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2012). Coding the Dictatorship of ‘the They:’ A Phenomenological Critique of Digital Rights Management. In Sanders, M. & Wisnewski, J. J. (Eds.), Ethics and Phenomenology (pp. 197–220). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2013). Biopolitics Is Not (Primarily) about Life: On Biopolitics, Neoliberalism, and Families. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 27(3), 322–335.Google Scholar
Hull, G. (2017). Equitable Relief as a Relay between Juridical and Biopower: The Case of School Desegregation. Continental Philosophy Review, 50(2), 225–248.Google Scholar
Hull, G., & Pasquale, F. (2018). Toward a Critical Theory of Corporate Wellness. BioSocieties, 13(1), 190–212. doi:10.1057/s41292-017-0064-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, M., & Mills, M. (2013). Uncovering Victoria’s Secret: Exploring Women’s Luxury Perceptions of Intimate Apparel and Purchasing Behaviour. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 460–485. doi:10.1108/JFMM-03-2013-0020.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (1992). Foucault’s Expulsion of Law: Toward a Retrieval. Law and Social Inquiry, 17(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
Ilbery, B., & Kneafsey, M. (2000). Producer Constructions of Quality in Regional Speciality Food Production: A Case Study from South West England. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(2), 217–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00041-8.Google Scholar
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006).Google Scholar
Impression Products v. Lexmark International, 137 S. Ct. 1523 (Supreme Court of the U.S. 2017).Google Scholar
In re Brunetti, 877 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2017).Google Scholar
In re Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2015).Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (2018, May 14). Multigene Test in Breast Ca Often Skipped Until After Surgery. MedPage Today.Google Scholar
Introna, L. D., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169-185. doi:10.1080/01972240050133634.Google Scholar
James, R. (2015). Resilience & Melancholy: Pop Music, Feminism, Neoliberalism. Alresford: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Jefferson, T. (1956). The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (Vol. 13). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Juffer, J. (1996). A Pornographic Femininity? Telling and Selling Victoria’s (Dirty) Secrets. Social Text (48), 27–48. doi:10.2307/466785.Google Scholar
Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co., 335 U.S. 560, 335 U.S. 560 (1949).Google Scholar
Kane, E. M. (2004). Splitting the Gene: DNA Patents and the Genetic Code. Tennessee Law Review, 71, 707–767.Google Scholar
Kane, E. M. (2011). Patenting Genes and Genetic Methods: What’s at Stake? Journal of Business and Technology Law, 6, 101–134.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, A. (2008). The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. Yale Law Journal, 117, 804–885.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, A. (2012). The Cost of Price: Why and How to Get Beyond Intellectual Property Internalism. UCLA Law Review, 59, 970–1026.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, A. (2014). Intellectual Property’s Leviathan. Law and Contemporary Problems, 77, 131–145.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, A. (2017). Order without Intellectual Property Law: Open Science in Influenza. Cornell Law Review, 102, 1539–1648.Google Scholar
Kary, J. H. (1999/2000). Contract Law and the Social Contract: What Legal History Can Teach Us about the Political Theory of Hobbes and Locke. Ottawa Law Review, 31, 73–91.Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K. (2006a). Performance, Property, and the Slashing of Gender in Fan Fiction. Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, 14, 461–518.Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K. (2006b). Semiotic Disobedience. Washington University Law Review, 84, 489–571.Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K. (2010a). Stealth Marketing and Antibranding: The Love that Dare Not Speak Its Name. Buffalo Law Review, 58, 795–849.Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K. (2010b). Trademark Intersectionality. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1601–1699.Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K. (2015). Cosmopolitanism and the Transnational Trademark. In Sun, H., Beebe, B., & Sunder, M. (Eds.), The Luxury Economy and Intellectual Property (pp. 309–337). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1993). The Stakes of Law, or Hale and Foucault! In Sexy Dressing Etc. (pp. 83–125). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. L. (1996). At the Crossroads: Rap Music and Its African Nexus. Ethnomusicology, 40(2), 223–248. doi:10.2307/852060.Google Scholar
Khan, L. M. (2018a). The Ideological Roots of America’s Market Power Problem. Yale Law Journal Forum, 127, 960–979.Google Scholar
Khan, L. M. (2018b). The New Brandeis Movement: America’s Antimonopoly Debate. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice, 9(3), 131–132.Google Scholar
Knopper, S. (2009). Appetite for Self-Destruction: The Spectacular Crash of the Record Industry in the Digital Age. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Koebler, J. (2017). Why American Farmers Are Hacking Their Tractors with Ukrainian Firmware. Vice. Retrieved from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xykkkd/why-american-farmers-are-hacking-their-tractors-with-ukrainian-firmware.Google Scholar
Kohane, I. S., Masys, D. R., & Altman, R. B. (2006). The Incidentalome: A Threat to Genomic Medicine. JAMA, 296(2), 212–215. doi:10.1001/jama.296.2.212.Google Scholar
KSR v. Teleflex, 550 U.S. 398 (2007).Google Scholar
Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Hopper, J. L., Barnes, D. R. et al. (2017). Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for brca1 and brca2 Mutation Carriers. JAMA, 317(23), 2402–2416. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7112.Google Scholar
Kukla, R. (2012). “Author TBD”: Radical Collaboration in Contemporary Biomedical Research. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 845–858. doi:10.1086/668042.Google Scholar
Kurian, A. W., Li, Y., Hamilton, A. S., Ward, K. C. et al. (2017). Gaps in Incorporating Germline Genetic Testing into Treatment Decision-Making for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(20), 2232–2239. doi:10.1200/jco.2016.71.6480.Google Scholar
Kurian, A. W., Ward, K. C., Hamilton, A. S. et al. (2018). Uptake, Results, and Outcomes of Germline Multiple-Gene Sequencing after Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. JAMA Oncology, 4(8), 1066–1072. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0644Google Scholar
Kwall, R. R. (2006). Inspiration and Innovation: The Intrinsic Dimension of the Artistic Soul. Notre Dame Law Review, 81, 1945–2012.Google Scholar
Laakmann, A. B. (2016). A Property Theory of Medical Innovation. Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 56, 117–163.Google Scholar
Lafraniere, S. (2006, March 22). In the Jungle, the Unjust Jungle, a Small Victory. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2006/03/22/world/africa/in-the-jungle-the-unjust-jungle-a-small-victory.html.Google Scholar
Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1987). Trademark Law: An Economic Perspective. Journal of Law and Economics, 30, 265–309.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Objects. In Bijker, W. E. & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp. 225–258). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern (Porter, C., Trans.).Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. (2011). A History of Drag Balls, Houses, and the Culture of Voguing. In Baker, S. (Ed.), Voguing and the House Ballroom Scene of New York, 1989–92. London: Soul Jazz.Google Scholar
Lee, E.-G., Kang, H. J., Lim, M. C. et al. (2018). Different Patterns of Risk Reducing Decisions in Affected or Unaffected BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers. Journal of Korean Cancer Association, 51(1), 280–288. doi:10.4143/crt.2018.079Google Scholar
Lemley, M. A. (1997). Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property. Texas Law Review, 75, 873–906.Google Scholar
Lemley, M. A. (2005). Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding. Texas Law Review, 83, 1031.Google Scholar
Lemley, M. A. (2008). The Surprisinig Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights. Stanford Law Review, 61, 311–354.Google Scholar
Lemley, M. A. (2015). Faith-Based Intellectual Property. UCLA Law Review, 62, 1328–1346.Google Scholar
Lemley, M. A., Risch, M., Sichelman, T., & Wagner, R. P. (2011). Life after Bilski. Stanford Law Review, 63(6), 1315–1347.Google Scholar
LeRoy v. Tatham, 55 U.S. 156 (1853).Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (1998). The New Chicago School. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 661–691. doi:10.1086/468039.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. (2006). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levmore, S. (2002). Two Stories about the Evolution of Property Rights. The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S2), S421–S451. doi:10.1086/342027.Google Scholar
Levy, L. (2018, December 6). The Gatekeepers of SoundCloud Rap. Vulture. Retrieved from www.vulture.com/2018/12/the-gatekeepers-of-soundcloud-rap.html.Google Scholar
Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. Impression Products, 816 F.3d 721 (2016).Google Scholar
The Lingerie Industry Reveals Some Secrets: Growing Market Raises Questions about Self-Image. (2014). Strategic Direction, 30(3), 19–21. doi:10.1108/SD-02-2014-0018.Google Scholar
Litman, J. (2002). Electronic Commerce and Free Speech. In Elkin-Koren, N. & Netanel, N. W. (Eds.), The Commodification of Information (pp. 23–42). The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Litman, J. (2006). Digital Copyright. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Lobel, O. (2018). You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v. MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark Side. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1997). Political Essays (Goldie, M. Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, C. (2006). Dilution. Columbia Law Review, 106, 1029–1078.Google Scholar
Loughran v. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co., 286 F. 694 (1923).Google Scholar
Loughran v. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co., 296 F. 822 (3rd Cir. 1924).Google Scholar
Lovett, F. (2010). Cultural Accommodation and Domination. Political Theory, 38(2), 243–267. doi:10.1177/0090591709354870.Google Scholar
Lowry, K. P., Lee, J. M., Kong, C. Y. et al. (2012). Annual Screening Strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Gene Mutation Carriers: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis. Cancer, 118(8), 2021–2030. doi:10.1002/cncr.26424.Google Scholar
Lubochinski, E. J. (2003). Hegel’s Secret: Personality and the Housemark Cases. Emory Law Journal, 52, 489–514.Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified Sex: A Critical Analysis of Sexual and Reproductive Self-Tracking Using Apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.920528.Google Scholar
Macaulay, T. B. (1841). Copyright. Retrieved from https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Copyright_Law_(Macaulay).Google Scholar
Madison, M. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Strandburg, K. J. (2009). The University as Constructed Cultural Commons. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 30, 365–403.Google Scholar
Madison, M. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Strandburg, K. J. (2010). Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment. Cornell Law Review, 95(2010), 657–709.Google Scholar
Mai, P. L., Vadaparampil, S. T., Breen, N., McNeel, T. S., Wideroff, L., & Graubard, B. I. (2014). Awareness of Cancer Susceptibility Genetic Testing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(5), 440–448. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.002.Google Scholar
Mansfield, B. (2003). Fish, Factory Trawlers, and Imitation Crab: The Nature of Quality in the Seafood Industry. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 9–21.Google Scholar
Marazzi, C. (2008). Capital and Language: From the New Economy to the War Economy. Los Angeles; Cambridge: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017).Google Scholar
Mathur, P., Jain, S. P., & Maheswaran, D. (2012). Consumers’ Implicit Theories about Personality Influence Their Brand Personality Judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 545–557. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.01.005.Google Scholar
Matsubayashi, H., Takaori, K., Morizane, C. et al. (2017). Familial Pancreatic Cancer: Concept, Management, and Issues. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 23(6), 935–948. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.935.Google Scholar
Mayo v. Prometheus, 132 S. Ct. 1289 (Supreme Court of the U.S. 2012).Google Scholar
Menapace, L., Colson, G., Grebitus, C., & Facendola, M. (2011). Consumers’ Preferences for Geographical Origin Labels: Evidence from the Canadian Olive Oil Market. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(2), 193–212. doi:10.1093/erae/jbq051.Google Scholar
Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Inv. Co., 320 U.S. 661 (1944).Google Scholar
Merges, R. P. (1993). Are You Making Fun of Me? Notes on Market Failure and the Parody Defense in Copyright. American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, 21, 305–312.Google Scholar
Merges, R. P. (2011). Justifying Intellectual Property. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merges, R. P. (2017a). Against Utilitarian Fundamentalism. [ssrn].Google Scholar
Merges, R. P. (2017b). Economics of Intellectual Property Law. In Parisi, F. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 2: Private and Commercial Law (pp. 200–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, T. W. (1998). Property and the Right to Exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77(4), 730–755.Google Scholar
Merrill, T. W., & Smith, H. E. (2001). What Happened to Property in Law and Economics? Yale Law Journal, 111, 357–398.Google Scholar
Merrill, T. W., & Smith, H. E. (2007). The Morality of Property. William and Mary Law Review, 48, 1849–1895.Google Scholar
Mezey, N. (2007). The Paradoxes of Cultural Property. Columbia Law Review, 107(8), 2004–2046.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1965). The Principles of Political Economy (Vol. III). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing Economic Life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31. doi:10.1080/03085149000000001.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2011). Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2013). Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Monsanto Chemical Co. v. Perfect Fit Products Manufacturing Co., No. 12-416, 349 F.2d 389 (2nd Cir. 1965).Google Scholar
Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co., 314 U.S. 488 (1942).Google Scholar
Moseley v. V. Secret Catalogue, 537 U.S. 413 (2003).Google Scholar
Moseley v. Victoria’s Secret Catalogue, Brief for Respondent, No. 01-1015, 537 U.S. 413 (2003).Google Scholar
Newman, G. E., & Dhar, R. (2014). Authenticity Is Contagious: Brand Essence and the Original Source of Production. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 51(3), 371–386.Google Scholar
Nimmer, D. (2001). Copyright in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship and Originality. Houston Law Review, 38, 1–217.Google Scholar
Nimmer, D. (2003). ‘Fairest of them All’ and other Fairy Tales of Fair Use. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 264–287.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., & Waclaw, B. (2017). Genes, Environment, and “Bad Luck”. Science, 355(6331), 1266.Google Scholar
O’Reilly v. Morse, 56 U.S. 62 (1854).Google Scholar
Oeppen, J., & Vaupel, J. W. (2002). Broken Limits to Life Expectancy. Science, 296(5570), 1029.Google Scholar
Offit, K., Bradbury, A., Storm, C., Merz, J. F., Noonan, K. E., & Spence, R. (2013). Gene Patents and Personalized Cancer Care: Impact of the Myriad Case on Clinical Oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(21), 2743–2748. doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.7388.Google Scholar
Oguamanam, C. (2009). Beyond Theories: Intellectual Property Dynamics in the Global Knowledge Economy. Wake Forest Intellectual Property Law Journal, 9(2), 105–154.Google Scholar
Oil States v. Greene, 138 S. Ct. 1365 (Supreme Court of the U.S. 2018).Google Scholar
Oke, J. (2018). Why BRCA Screening Will Harm (Some) Women. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjebmspotlight/2018/01/24/brca-screening-will-harm-women/.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. (2002). Mistresses of Their Own Destiny:’ Group Rights, Gender, and Realistic Rights of Exit. Ethics, 112, 205–230.Google Scholar
Oliar, D. (2006). Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress as a Limitation on Congress’s Intellectual Property Power. Georgetown Law Journal, 94, 1771–1845.Google Scholar
Ouellette, L. (2018). What Happened in Patent Law in the Past Year? Retrieved from https://writtendescription.blogspot.com/2018/01/what-happened-in-patent-law-in-past-year.html.Google Scholar
Park, J. K., & John, D. R. (2010). Got to Get You into My Life: Do Brand Personalities Rub Off on Consumers? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 655–669. doi:10.1086/655807.Google Scholar
Park, J. K., & John, D. R. (2012). Capitalizing on Brand Personalities in Advertising: The Influence of Implicit Self-Theories on Ad Appeal Effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 424–432. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.05.004.Google Scholar
Parry, B. (2008). Geographical Indications: Not all Champagne and Roses. In Bently, L., Davis, J., & Ginsburg, J. C. (Eds.), Trade Marks and Brands: An Interdisciplinary Critique. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patry, W. (2009). Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peeler, C. D. (1999). From the Providence of Kings to Copyrighted Things (and French Moral Rights). Independent International and Comparative Law Review, 9, 423–456.Google Scholar
Peñalver, E. M., & Katyal, S. K. (2010). Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protesters Improve the Law of Ownership. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Perfect 10 v. Google, 653 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2011).Google Scholar
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
Phili, S. (2013, May 6). Robin Thicke on that Banned Video, Collaborating with 2 Chainz and Kendrick Lamar, and His New Film. GQ. Retrieved from www.gq.com/story/robin-thicke-interview-blurred-lines-music-video-collaborating-with-2-chainz-and-kendrick-lamar-mercy.Google Scholar
Pike, A. (2009). Geographies of Brands and Branding. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 619–645. doi:10.1177/0309132508101601.Google Scholar
Pike, A. (2011). Placing Brands and Branding: A Socio-Spatial Biography of Newcastle Brown Ale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(2), 206–222. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00425.x.Google Scholar
Pike, A. (2013). Economic Geographies of Brands and Branding. Economic Geography, 89(4), 317–339. doi:10.1111/ecge.12017.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. (2005). Intellectual Property: The Law and Economics Approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(2), 57–73.Google Scholar
Poster, M. (2001). What’s the Matter with the Internet? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Prince, A. E. R. (2015). Prevention for Those Who Can Pay: Insurance Reimbursement of Genetic-Based Preventive Interventions in the Liminal State between Health and Disease. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(2), 365–395. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsv008.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. (1996). Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality. In Essays on the Anthropology of Reason (pp. 91–111). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower Today. BioSocieties, 1, 195–217.Google Scholar
Rai, S. (2001, August 25). India–U.S. Fight on Basmati Rice Is Mostly Settled. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2001/08/25/business/india-us-fight-on-basmati-rice-is-mostly-settled.html.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K., & Sprigman, C. (2012). The Knockoff Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, L. (2017). Truth or Spin? Disease Definition in Cancer Screening. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 42(4), 385–404. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhx006.Google Scholar
Reilly, G. (2018). Our 19th Century Patent System. IP Theory, 7(2). Retrieved from www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ipt/vol7/iss2/3.Google Scholar
Richards, C. (2012, July 6). The Court Case that Changed Hip-Hop – From Public Enemy to Kanye – Forever. Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-court-case-that-changed-hip-hop--from-public-enemy-to-kanye--forever/2012/07/06/.Google Scholar
Riley, A. R. (2000). Recovering Collectivity: Group Rights to Intellectual Property in Indigenous Communities. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 18, 175–225.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. J. (2017). Supreme Court’s Printer Decision Is Good News for Retailers and Consumers. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/05/30/supreme-court-printers/.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. (1990). Property as Storytelling: Perspectives from Game Theory, Narrative Theory, Feminist Theory. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2(1), 37–57.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. (1999). Canons of Property Talk, or, Blackstone’s Anxiety. Yale Law Journal, 108, 601–632.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. (2005). Property in all the Wrong Places. Yale Law Journal, 114, 991–1019.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. (2006). Introduction: Property and Language, or, the Ghost of the Fifth Panel. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 18(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Rose, M. (1993). Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, N. S. (2007). Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, T. (1989). Orality and Technology: Rap Music and Afro‐American Cultural Resistance. Popular Music and Society, 13(4), 35–44. doi:10.1080/03007768908591371.Google Scholar
Rose, T. (1991). “Fear of a Black Planet”: Rap Music and Black Cultural Politics in the 1990s. The Journal of Negro Education, 60(3), 276–290. doi:10.2307/2295482.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, E. L. (2011). A Theory of IP’s Negative Space. Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 34, 317–365.Google Scholar
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court of the U.S. 1991).Google Scholar
Sasso, B. (2014). Congress Passed a Cell-Phone Unlocking Bill. But It Won’t Do Much. The Atlantic. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/07/congress-passed-a-cell-phone-unlocking-bill-but-it-wont-do-much/457434/.Google Scholar
Schaper, M., & Schicktanz, S. (2018). Medicine, Market, and Communication: Ethical Considerations in Regard to Persuasive Communication in Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing Services. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), 56. doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0292-3.Google Scholar
Schechter, F. I. (1925). The Historical Foundations of the Law Relating to Trade-Marks. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schechter, F. I. (1927). The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection. Harvard Law Review, 40(6), 813–833. doi:10.2307/1330367.Google Scholar
Schillinger, D., & Dohan, D. (2008). Genetic Testing for Vulnerable Populations: What Kinds of Communication We Need and Do Not Need. The American Journal of Bioethics, 8(6), 12–14. doi:10.1080/15265160802248393.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2011). Who Speaks? Citizen Political Voice on the Internet Commons. Daedalus, 140(4), 121–139. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00119.Google Scholar
Schur, R. L. (2011). Parodies of Ownership: Hip-Hop Aesthetics and Intellectual Property Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sell, S. K. (2003). Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seltzer, W. (2010). Free Speech Unmoored in Copyright’s Safe Harbor: Chilling Effects of the DMCA on the First Amendment. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 24(1), 171–232.Google Scholar
Senftleben, M. (2009). The Trademark Tower of Babel – Dilution Concepts in International, US and EC Trademark Law. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 40(1), 45–77.Google Scholar
Shaul, O. (2017). How Introns Enhance Gene Expression. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 91, 145–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2017.06.016.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. (1999). Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, J. (2008). The Mythical Beginnings of Intellectual Property. George Mason Law Review, 15, 319–379.Google Scholar
Silbey, J. (2014). The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Everyday Intellectual Property. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. (2002). Taking Risks: Extreme Sports and the Embrace of Risk in Advanced Liberal Societies. In Baker, T. & Simon, J. (Eds.), Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility (pp. 177–208). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simons, H. C. (1948). Economics Policy for a Free Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skytte, A. B., Gerdes, A. M., Andersen, M. K. et al. (2010). Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Salpingo-Oophorectomy in Unaffected BRCA Mutation Carriers: Uptake and Timing*. Clinical Genetics, 77(4), 342–349. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01329.x.Google Scholar
Smith, D. (2013, July 25). South Africa Fights to Protect Rooibos Tea Name after French Trademark Bid. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/25/south-africa-rooibos-tea-france.Google Scholar
Smith, H. (2002). Exclusion versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights. The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S2), S453–S487. doi:10.1086/344529.Google Scholar
Smith, H. E. (2007). Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information. Yale Law Journal, 116, 1742–1822.Google Scholar
Spence, L. K. (2011). Stare in the Darkness: The Limits of Hip-Hop and Black Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
State v. Shack, 58 N.J. 297 (1971).Google Scholar
Stone, B. (2009, July 17). Amazon Erases Orwell Books from Kindle. New York Times.Google Scholar
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D. (2016). The Biological Effects and Clinical Implications of BRCA Mutations: Where Do We Go from Here? European Journal of Human Genetics, 24 (Suppl 1), S3–S9. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2016.93.Google Scholar
Strahilevitz, L. J. (2007). Wealth without Markets. Yale Law Journal, 116, 1472–1516.Google Scholar
Strandburg, K. J. (2005). Curiosity-Driven Research and University Technology Transfer. In Libecap, G. D. (Ed.), University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Process, Design, and Intellectual Property (pp. 93–122). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Strandburg, K. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Madison, M. J. (2017). The Knowledge Commons Framework. In Frischmann, B. M., Strandburg, K. J., & Madison, M. J. (Eds.), Governing Medical Knowledge Commons (pp. 9–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunder, M. (2000). Intellectual Property and Identity Politics: Playing with Fire. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 4, 67–98.Google Scholar
Sunder, M. (2001). Cultural Dissent. Stanford Law Review, 54, 495–567.Google Scholar
Sunder, M. (2006). IP3. Stanford Law Review, 59, 257–332.Google Scholar
Sunder, M. (2007). The Invention of Traditional Knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems, 70, 97–124.Google Scholar
Sunder, M. (2008). Intellectual Property and Development as Freedom. In Netanel, N. W. (Ed.), The Development Agenda. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunder, M. (2012). From Goods to a Good Life: Intellectual Property and Global Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sunder Rajan, K. (2006). Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (1996). Social Norms and Social Roles. Columbia Law Review, 96, 903–968.Google Scholar
Surbone, A. (2011). Social and Ethical Implications of BRCA Testing. Annals of Oncology, 22(Suppl 1), i60–i66. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq668f.Google Scholar
Tadros, V. (1998). Between Governance and Discipline: The Law and Michel Foucault. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), 75–103. doi:10.1093/ojls/18.1.75.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. O. (2019). Patent Reform, Then and Now. Michigan State Law Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tehranian, J. (2012). Towards a Critical IP Theory: Copyright, Consecration & Control. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, 1237–1296.Google Scholar
Tellmann, U. (2013). Catastrophic Populations and the Fear of the Future: Malthus and the Genealogy of Liberal Economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(2), 135–155. doi:10.1177/0263276412455830.Google Scholar
Thacker, E. (2005). The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tkach, J. (1997a). The Central Plank Cracks. Transformed by Truth: Grace Communion International. Retrieved from www.gci.org/aboutus/truth9.Google Scholar
Tkach, J. (1997b). The First Reforms. Transformed by Truth: Grace Communion International. Retrieved from www.gci.org/aboutus/truth8.Google Scholar
Tomasetti, C., Li, L., & Vogelstein, B. (2017). Stem Cell Divisions, Somatic Mutations, Cancer Etiology, and Cancer Prevention. Science, 355(6331), 1330.Google Scholar
Tomasetti, C., & Vogelstein, B. (2015). Variation in Cancer Risk among Tissues Can Be Explained by the Number of Stem Cell Divisions. Science, 347(6217), 78.Google Scholar
Triangle Publications v. Rohrlich,, 167 F.2d (2nd Cir. 1948).Google Scholar
Tully, J. (1993). Rediscovering America: The Two Treatises and Aboriginal Rights. In An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts (pp. 137–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, R. (2004). Copy This Essay: How Fair Use Doctrine Harms Free Speech and How Copying Serves It. Yale Law Journal, 114, 535–590.Google Scholar
Tushnet, R. (2007). My Fair Ladies: Sex, Gender, and Fair Use in Copyright. American University Journal of Gender and Social Policy, 15, 273–303.Google Scholar
Tushnet, R. (2009). Economies of Desire: Fair Use and Marketplace Assumptions. William and Mary Law Review, 51, 513–546.Google Scholar
Tzouvala, N. (2017). Neoliberalism as Legalism: International Economic Law and the Rise of the Judiciary. In Golder, B. & McLoughlin, D. (Eds.), The Politics of Legality in a Neoliberal Age (pp. 97–115). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
V Secret Catalogue, Inc. v. Moseley, 259 F.3d 464 (6th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
V. Secret Catalogue v. Moseley, 605 F.3d 382 (6th Cir. 2010).Google Scholar
Vadaparampil, S. T., Malo, T., de la Cruz, C., & Christie, J. (2012). Do Breast Cancer Patients Tested in the Oncology Care Setting Share BRCA Mutation Results with Family Members and Health Care Providers? Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2012, 498062. doi:10.1155/2012/498062.Google Scholar
Van Horn, R. (2009). Reinventing Monopoly and the Role of Corporations: The Roots of Chicago Law and Economics. In Mirowski, P. & Plehwe, D. (Eds.), The Road from Mont Pèrelin (pp. 204–237). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Horn, R., & Klaes, M. (2013). Intervening in Laissez-Faire Liberalism: Chicago’s Shift on Patents. In Van Horn, R., Mirowski, P., & Stapleford, T. A. (Eds.), Building Chicago Economics: New Perspectives on the History of America’s Most Powerful Economics Program (Paperback ed. ed., pp. 180–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Horn, R., & Mirowski, P. (2009). The Rise of the Chicago School of Economics and the Birth of Neoliberalism. In Mirowski, P. & Plehwe, D. (Eds.), The Road from Mont Pèrelin (pp. 139–178). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vatter, M. (2017). Foucault and Becker: A Biopolitical Approach to Human Capital and the Stability of Preferences. In Golder, B. & McLoughlin, D. (Eds.), The Politics of Legality in a Neoliberal Age (pp. 64–82). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Venn, C. (2009). Neoliberal Political Economy, Biopolitics and Colonialism: A Transcolonial Genealogy of Inequality. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 206–233. doi:10.1177/0263276409352194.Google Scholar
Vinaya, S. (2012). Intellectual Property Rights and the Handloom Sector: Challenges in Implementation of Geographical Indications Act. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17(1), 55–63.Google Scholar
Virno, P. (2003). A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life (Bertoletti, I., Cascaito, J., & Casson, A., Trans.). Cambridge: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
VMG Salsoul, LLC v. Ciccone, 824 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2016).Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. P. (2003). Information Wants to Be Free: Intellectual Property and the Mythologies of Control. Columbia Law Review, 103, 995–1034.Google Scholar
Walterscheid, E. C. (1994). To Promote the Progress of Science and Useful Arts: the Background and Origin of the Intellectual Property Clause of the United States Constitution. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2, 1–56.Google Scholar
Ware, J. H. (2006). The Limitations of Risk Factors as Prognostic Tools. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(25), 2615–2617. doi:10.1056/NEJMp068249.Google Scholar
Weiner, C. (1987). Patenting and Academic Research: Historical Case Studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 12(1), 50–62. doi:10.1177/016224398701200105Google Scholar
Welch, H. G., Prorok, P. C., O’Malley, A. J., & Kramer, B. S. (2016). Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(15), 1438–1447. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1600249Google Scholar
Wheeler, E. A. (1991). “Most of My Heroes Don’t Appear on No Stamps”: The Dialogics of Rap Music. Black Music Research Journal, 11(2), 193–216. doi:10.2307/779266.Google Scholar
White-Smith Music Publishing v. Apollo, 201 U.S. 1 (1908).Google Scholar
Wieberg, S. (2005, August 23, 2005). NCAA Allowing Florida State to Use its Seminole Mascot. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/2005-08-23-fsu-mascot-approved_x.htmGoogle Scholar
Wilf, S. (2008). The Making of the Post-War Paradigm in American Intellectual Property Law. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 31(2), 139–207.Google Scholar
Williams v. Gaye, 885 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 2018).Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109, 121–136.Google Scholar
Woolf, N. (2016, Nov. 18). Urban Outfitters Settles with Navajo Nation after Illegally Using tribe’s Name. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/18/urban-outfitters-navajo-nation-settlement.Google Scholar
Worldwide Church of God v. Philadelphia Church of God, Inc., 227 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
Wu, T. (2012). Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement if Innovation Mattered Most. Antitrust Law Journal, 78(2), 313–328.Google Scholar
Wu, T. (2013). Intellectual Property Experimentalism by Way of Competition Law. Competition Policy International, 9(2), 30–40.Google Scholar
Yu, P. K. (2008). Cultural Relics, Intellectual Property, and Intangible Heritage. Temple Law Review, 81, 433–506.Google Scholar
Yu, P. P., Vose, J. M., & Hayes, D. F. (2015). Genetic Cancer Susceptibility Testing: Increased Technology, Increased Complexity. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(31), 3533–3534. doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.3628Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Gordon Hull, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
  • Book: The Biopolitics of Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 01 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687232.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Gordon Hull, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
  • Book: The Biopolitics of Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 01 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687232.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Gordon Hull, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
  • Book: The Biopolitics of Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 01 November 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687232.008
Available formats
×