Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:20:57.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical and hormonal influences in vivo cause regional differences in bone remodelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Fiona Lyall
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
A. J. El Haj
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The purpose of this chapter is to show that the responses to osteotropic influences of different bones in the skeleton vary according to a ‘survival value’ associated with that particular bone. An understanding of the mechanisms by which these differences occur, particularly the ways in which some bones are resistant to resorption, could have pervasive consequences in the treatment of diseases which are characterised by functionally inappropriate bone loss.

Function of the skeleton

The skeleton has numerous functions, but the one which accounts predominantly for its shape, mass and material properties is the requirement that it should bear loads. Bone is unique among the tissues of the body in the level of its resistance to compressive forces, which results from its composition. While collagen and other organic components give tensile strength, hydroxyapatite is responsible for the resistance to compression. The relative amounts of these two components vary at different stages in life. Young animals have bones which are compliant as a result of a high proportion of organic components and relatively little mineral. This has been suggested to confer resistance to falls which would result in fractures in individuals with more rigid skeletons. Of course, the consequence of such compliance is greater dissipation of energy during loading. This translates into a structure which wastes more energy during locomotion than a more rigid bone (Currey, 1969). During maturation, mineralisation of the skeleton increases, and the individual usually becomes more coordinated, so that falls are less likely, and efficient locomotion is a more important requirement than high fracture threshold.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×