Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:27:28.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Conclusions and research agendas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Susan Perry
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles
Dorothy M. Fragaszy
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Susan Perry
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Current state of knowledge regarding the biology of traditions

What is the biological importance of social learning and traditions to the animals?

Recently, biologists have become aware that social learning may play a pivotal role in the behavioral biology and evolution of many animal species. Animals may alter their environments in such a way that they create new selective pressures for the next generation; in other words, they take an active role in shaping the environments that determine the course of their species' evolution (Avital and Jablonka, 2000; Laland, Odling-Smee and Feldman, 2000; Pulliam, 2000; see Ch. 12 for examples of ways in which nonhuman primates may construct their niches). Nevertheless, there are astonishingly few data, particularly from the field, regarding the prevalence of traditions in nature and the fitness consequences of engaging in social learning or practicing particular traditions. Consequently, modelers continue to rely heavily on thought experiments and hypothetical examples to convince readers of the logic of their arguments (e.g., Avital and Jablonka, 2000). Currently, there are very few species and behavioral domains for which the topic of traditions has been thoroughly addressed (i.e., with adequate methodology to assess the role of social learning) in the wild, and we know little about the biological importance of social learning in nature. There are, no doubt, taxonomic biases regarding which species and topics have been targeted for study (e.g., biologists regularly look for tool use in primates and vocal traditions in birds).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Biology of Traditions
Models and Evidence
, pp. 426 - 440
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arcadi, A. C. 1996. Phrase structure of wild chimpanzee pant hoots: patterns of production and interpopulation variability. American Journal of Primatology, 39, 159–1783.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcadi, A. C., Robert, D., and Boesch, C. 1998. Buttress drumming by wild chimpanzees: temporal patterning, phrase integration into loud calls, and preliminary evidence for individual distinctiveness. Primates, 39, 505–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avital, E. and Jablonka, E. 2000. Animal Traditions: Behavioural Inheritance in Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Baldwin, J. M. 1896. A new factor in evolution. American Naturalist, 30, 441–451, 536–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughman, J. W. 1998. Vocal learning by greater spear-nosed bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 265, 227–233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Box, H. and Gibson, K. R. 1999. Mammalian Social Learning: Comparative and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. 1996. Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. In Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 88, Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man, ed. W. G. Runciman, J. M. Smith, and R. I. M. Dunbar. pp. 77–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bradbury, J. W. and Vehrencamp, S. L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
Cook, M. and Mineka, S. 1989. Observational conditioning of fear to fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimuli in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 448–459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coussi-Korbel, S. and Fragaszy, D. M. 1995. On the relation between social dynamics and social learning. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1441–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. and Hinde, R. A. 1949. The opening of milk bottles by birds. British Birds, 42, 347–357Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D. and Visalberghi, E. 1996. Social learning in monkeys: primate “primacy” reconsidered. In Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture, ed. C. M. Heyes and B. G. Galef Jr., pp. 65–84. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Giraldeau, L.-A. and Caraco, T. 2000. Social Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Green, S. 1975. Dialects in japanese monkeys: vocal learning and cultural transmission of locale-specific vocal behavior?Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 38, 304–314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenfield, M. D. 1994. Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of signal interactions. Annual Review of Evolution and Systematics, 25, 97–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfman, G. S. and Schultz, E. T. 1984. Social transmission of behavioural traditions in a coral reef fish. Animal Behaviour, 32, 379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogland, J. L. 1996. Why do Gunnison's prairie dogs give anti-predator calls?Animal Behaviour, 51, 871–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, C. H. and DiBitetti, M. S. 1997. Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, P. 2000. Coping with crowded conditions. In Natural Conflict Resolution, ed. F. Aureli and F. B. M. de Waal, pp. 129–154, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Kummer, H. 1995. In Quest of the Sacred Baboon: A Scientist's Journey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Laland, K. N. and Williams, K. 1997. Shoaling generates social learning of foraging information in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 53, 1161–1169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K. N, Odling-Smee, J., and Feldman, M. W. 2000. Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefebvre, L., Whittle, P., Lascaris, E., and Finkelstein, A. 1997. Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 53, 549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, A., Chivers, D. P, and Smith, R. J. F. 1996. Cultural transmission of predator recognition in fishes: intraspecific and interspecific learning. Animal Behaviour, 51, 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mineka, S. and Cook, M. 1986. Immunization against the observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 307–318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitani, J. C., Hunley, K. L., and Murdoch, M. E. 1999. Geographic variation in the calls of wild chimpanzees: a reassessment. American Journal of Primatology, 47, 133–1513.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulliam, H. R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters, 3, 349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M. and Cheney, D. L. 1999. Production, usage, and response in nonhuman primate vocal development. In The Design of Animal Communication, ed. M. D. Hauser and M. Konishi, pp. 392–417, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Schaik, C. P., Deaner, R. O., and Merrill, M. Y. 1999. The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture. Journal of Human Evolution, 36, 719–741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vehrencamp, S. L. 2001. Is song-type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 1637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieth, W., Curio, E. and Ernst, U. 1980. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing: III. Cultural transmission of enemy recognition in blackbirds: cross-species tutoring and properties of learning. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1217–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. and Byrne, R. W. 1988. Tactical deception in primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 233–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. and Ham, R. 1992. On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: reappraisal of a century of research. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 21, 239–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. C. 1985. The molecular basis of evolution. Scientific American, 253, 148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentall, T. R., Sutton, J. E., and Sherburne, L. M. 1996. True imitation in pigeons. Psychological Science, 7, 343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusions and research agendas
    • By Susan Perry, Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusions and research agendas
    • By Susan Perry, Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusions and research agendas
    • By Susan Perry, Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Edited by Dorothy M. Fragaszy, University of Georgia, Susan Perry, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Biology of Traditions
  • Online publication: 27 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.016
Available formats
×