Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:04:06.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Epigenetic regulation of trophoblast development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2009

By
P. Hajkova ,
S. E. Erhardt  and
M. A. Surani
Edited by
Ashley Moffett ,
Charlie Loke  and
Anne McLaren
Ashley Moffett
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Charlie Loke
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Anne McLaren
Affiliation:
Cancer Research, UK
Get access

Summary

Trophectoderm is the first differentiated lineage to be established during development. In the mouse, the founder cells for this lineage are set aside early as a result of asynchronous division of eight-cell-stage blastomeres, the outer cells being the founder cells for the trophectoderm lineage while the inner cells form the inner cell mass (Johnson & Ziomek 1981). The pluripotent epiblast cells in the inner cell mass of blastocysts serve as the precursors of the developing fetus. However, some of the key signalling molecules for early development of the pluripotent epiblast cells originate from the trophectoderm and primary endoderm cells (Beddington & Robertson 1999), including the signals for the specification of germ cells (McLaren 1999). The purpose of this review is to focus on the role of epigenetic mechanisms in the establishment of the trophectoderm lineage and the subsequent development of the placenta. In particular we are interested in how the maternally inherited factors in the oocyte affect development of the trophoblast through their effect on epigenetic modifications. Although this aspect requires detailed investigations, there are already indications that the interactions between maternal factors in the oocytes and the parental genomes may be critical for early development, including development of the trophoblast.

Role of genomic imprinting in development of the trophoblast

At the time of fertilisation, the parental genomes are epigenetically non-equivalent, but additional epigenetic modifications ensue in the early zygote (Ferguson-Smith & Surani 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Biology and Pathology of Trophoblast , pp. 33 - 45
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, N. D., Norris, M. L. & Surani, M. A. (1990). Epigenetic control of transgene expression and imprinting by genotype-specific modifiers. Cell, 61, 853–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arney, K. L., Erhardt, S., Drewell, R. A. & Surani, M. A. (2001). Epigenetic reprogramming of the genome – from the germ line to the embryo and back again. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45, 533–50.Google Scholar
Arney, K. L., Bao, S., Bannister, A. J., Kouzarides, T. & Surani, M. A. (2002). Histone methylation defines epigenetic asymmetry in the mouse zygote. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 46, 317–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Beddington, R. S. & Robertson, E. J. (1999). Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals. Cell, 96, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, F. (2004). Plant sciences. Imprinting – a green variation. Science, 303, 483–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constancia, M., Hemberger, M., Hughes, J.et al. (2002). Placental-specific IGF-II is a major modulator of placental and fetal growth. Nature, 417, 945–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, H. & Scott, R. (2002). DEMETER, Goddess of the harvest, activates maternal MEDEA to produce the perfect seed. Mol. Cell, 10, 5–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erhardt, S., Su, I. H., Schneider, R.et al. (2003). Consequences of the depletion of zygotic and embryonic Enhancer of Zeste 2 during pre-implantation mouse development. Development, 130, 4235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson-Smith, A. C. & Reik, W. (2003). The need for Eed. Nat. Genet., 33, 433–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson-Smith, A. C. & Surani, M. A. (2001). Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes. Science, 293, 1086–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillemot, F., Caspary, T., Tilghman, S. M.et al. (1995). Genomic imprinting of Mash2, a mouse gene required for trophoblast development. Nat. Genet., 9, 235–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haig, D. & Wilkins, J. F. (2000). Genomic imprinting, sibling solidarity and the logic of collective action. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 355, 1593–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajkova, P., Erhardt, S., Lane, N.et al. (2002). Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev., 117, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. H. & Ziomek, C. A. (1981). The foundation of two distinct cell lineages within the mouse morula. Cell, 24, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, Y., Rideout, W. M.Hilton, K.3rdet al. (1999). Developmental potential of mouse primordial germ cells. Development, 126, 1823–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, J., Inoue, K., Ono, R.et al. (2002). Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development, 129, 1807–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Lefebvre, L., Viville, S., Barton, S. C.et al. (1998). Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nat. Genet., 20, 163–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, L., Keverne, E. B., Aparicio, S. A.et al. (1999). Regulation of maternal behavior and offspring growth by paternally expressed Peg3. Science, 284, 330–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mager, J., Montgomery, N. D., Villena, F. P. & Magnuson, T. (2003). Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed. Nat. Genet., 33, 502–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, W., Niveleau, A., Walter, J., Fundele, R. & Haaf, T. (2000). Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature, 403, 501–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A. (1999). Signaling for germ cells. Genes Dev., 13, 373–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Carroll, D., Erhardt, S., Pagani, M.et al. (2001). The polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development. Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 4330–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oswald, J., Engemann, S., Lane, N.et al. (2000). Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr. Biol., 10, 475–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reik, W., Dean, W. & Walter, J. (2001). Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science, 293, 1089–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, J. F. & Dawson, W. D. (1970). Foetal and placental size in a Peromyscus species cross. J. Reprod. Fertil., 21, 255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surani, M. A. (2001). Reprogramming of genome function through epigenetic inheritance. Nature, 414, 122–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surani, M. A., Barton, S. C. & Norris, M. L. (1986). Nuclear transplantation in the mouse: heritable differences between parental genomes after activation of the embryonic genome. Cell, 45, 127–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, M., Puchyr, M., Gertsenstein, M.et al. (1999). Parental origin-specific expression of Mash2 is established at the time of implantation with its imprinting mechanism highly resistant to genome-wide demethylation. Mech. Dev., 87, 129–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrana, P. B., Guan, X. J., Ingram, R. S. & Tilghman, S. M. (1998). Genomic imprinting is disrupted in interspecific Peromyscus hybrids. Nat. Genet., 20, 362–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yadegari, R., Kinoshita, T., Lotan, O.et al. (2000). Mutations in the FIE and MEA genes that encode interacting polycomb proteins cause parent-of-origin effects on seed development by distinct mechanisms. Plant Cell, 12, 2367–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zechner, U., Hemberger, M., Constancia, M.et al. (2002). Proliferation and growth factor expression in abnormally enlarged placentae of mouse interspecific hybrids. Dev. Dyn., 224, 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, M. J. R., McLaren, A. & Michie, D. (1960). Foetal growth in the mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B Biol. Sci., 153, 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, A. (1965a). Maternal factors in nidation. In Park, W. W., ed., The Early Conceptus, Normal and Abnormal. Edinburgh: University of St Andrews Press, pp. 27–33.Google Scholar
McLaren, A. (1965b). Genetic and environmental effects on foetal and placental growth in the mouse. J. Reprod. Fertil., 9, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, A. & Michie, D. (1956). Studies on the transfer of fertilized mouse eggs to uterine foster-mothers. I. Factors affecting the implantation and survival of native and transferred eggs. J. Exp. Biol., 33, 394–416.Google Scholar
McLaren, A. & Michie, D. (1960). Control of pre-natal growth in mammals. Nature, 187, 363–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×