Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:03:37.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Suppressiveness of Soils to Invading Micro-organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Heikki M. T. Hokkanen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
James M. Lynch
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Many attempts have been made to control soilborne plant pathogens and to improve the growth of plants by inoculation of seed or soil with selected strains of micro-organisms; mainly bacteria. More recently, selected bacteria that are expected to degrade xenobiotics have been suggested for the bioremediation of polluted sites (Short et al 1990). Nowadays, risk assessment studies also need to address the fate of engineered telluric soil and non-telluric soil bacteria (Tiedje et al., 1989; Doyle etal, 1991).

Besides increased crop yields claimed by Russian workers (Schroth and Becker, 1990), most of the tentative applications of micro-organisms in agricultural soils have failed. The widely practised inoculation of legume seeds with Rhizobium spp. is one of the few examples of success of application of micro-organisms to improve crop yield (Stacey and Upchurch, 1984). Application of the strain K84, and more recently of the modified strain K1026, of Agrobacterium radiobacter to control crown gall of plants is one of the few examples of a biological control method commercially applied with some success in several countries (Ryder and Jones, 1990). In most cases, the beneficial effects expected from the microbial inoculation are not consistently reproduced under field conditions. The poor survival of the introduced microorganisms in soil is the main explanation for these failures. In fact, the population density of the introduced micro-organisms decreases to the limit of the carrying capacity of the soil. Moreover, the soil represents very heterogeneous environments in which the introduced micro-organisms must find suitable habitats, some of which are very strain specific (Hattori and Hattori, 1976).

Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Control
Benefits and Risks
, pp. 3 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×