Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Series Preface
- Preface: Overview of Benefits and Risks of Biological Control Introductions
- Part I Biological Invasions
- Part II Classical Biocontrol
- 5 Benefits and Risks of Classical Biological Control
- 6 Potential Impacts on Threatened and Endangered Insects Species in the United States from Introductions of Parasitic Hymenoptera for the Control of Insect Pests
- 7 Lessons from Post-release Investigations in Classical Biological Control: The Case of Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hym., Braconidae) Introduced into Australia and New Zealand for the Biological Control of Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Col., Curculionidae)
- 8 Host Specificity Screening of Insect Biological Weed Control Agents as Part of an Environmental Risk Assessment
- Part III Augmentative Biocontrol
- Part IV Use of Genetically Modified Organisms
- Part V Economics and Registration
- Index
8 - Host Specificity Screening of Insect Biological Weed Control Agents as Part of an Environmental Risk Assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Series Preface
- Preface: Overview of Benefits and Risks of Biological Control Introductions
- Part I Biological Invasions
- Part II Classical Biocontrol
- 5 Benefits and Risks of Classical Biological Control
- 6 Potential Impacts on Threatened and Endangered Insects Species in the United States from Introductions of Parasitic Hymenoptera for the Control of Insect Pests
- 7 Lessons from Post-release Investigations in Classical Biological Control: The Case of Microctonus aethiopoides Loan (Hym., Braconidae) Introduced into Australia and New Zealand for the Biological Control of Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal (Col., Curculionidae)
- 8 Host Specificity Screening of Insect Biological Weed Control Agents as Part of an Environmental Risk Assessment
- Part III Augmentative Biocontrol
- Part IV Use of Genetically Modified Organisms
- Part V Economics and Registration
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Host specificity screening is the most important step that each potential weed biological control agent (whether insect or pathogen) has to pass prior to its introduction (Schroeder, 1983). Regardless of its control potential, only the demonstrated safety of plants of economic or ecological importance in the release area, will lead to approval for release of the control agent. The use of screening-protocols for weed biological control agents (Wapshere, 1975; Schroeder, 1983; CAB, 1986) are now widely accepted. Even less rigorous tests in the first part of this century have never led to the release of a ‘new pest’ (Crawley, 1989; Howarth, 1991).
The safety record of weed biocontrol using insects is excellent, nonetheless, the growing awareness of the public towards environmental interference by man, has led to legislative regulations such as the ‘Biological Control Act of 1984’ in Australia. Today, information on the environmental impact, alternatives, the relationship between local short-term uses and long-term productivity, and a risk analysis of the proposed action are required. Conflicts of interest over the implementation or safety of a specific biological control programme or agents, may still arise (Delfosse, 1990).
During the last decades especially, the critical objections of nature conservationists who fear for already stricken and endangered plant species related to the target weed, have considerably delayed the progress of programmes (Schroeder and Goeden, 1986). Despite the excellent safety record of weed biocontrol, we have to assess the risks of introducing a foreign species into a new environment.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Biological ControlBenefits and Risks, pp. 84 - 90Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995
- 11
- Cited by