Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:15:10.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Mechanisms of Flow and Sediment Transport in Fluvial Ecosystems: Physical and Ecological Consequences

from Part IV - Coupling Fluvial and Aeolian Geomorphology, Hydrology/Hydraulics, and Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Brett Eaton
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Jordan Rosenfeld
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Edward A. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Yvonne E. Martin
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Anyone who has spent time in or around rivers will recognize that water flows in complex, ever-changing patterns that are in part determined by the physical shape and roughness of the stream boundaries. Low gradient, deep rivers may look almost like lakes, having very smooth water surfaces giving little indication that the water is flowing at all, while a great deal less water flowing through a steep, cobble-bedded mountain channel may form a turbulent, noisy maelstrom of whitewater (Figure 10.1). It is also true that these complex flow patterns imprint themselves physically upon the riverine environment by eroding, transporting and depositing sediment and organic material, thereby shaping the streams in which the water flows.

Channels that have developed within large deposits of sediment (i.e., floodplains, fans and deltas) have alluvial channel boundaries, meaning that they consist of the sediment transported and deposited by the river itself. These systems are particularly dynamic, in that the boundaries of the stream channel evolve at rates that are appreciable on human timescales; the evolution of these boundaries is determined by the interplay between the forces and energy associated with the flux of water in the stream channel and the quantity and texture of sediment delivered to a stream channel from the surrounding drainage basin. In this way, the behavior of a stream at any given point can be influenced by processes happening anywhere in the drainage basin upstream. As the boundaries of these alluvial streams change, the aquatic ecosystems that they support must adapt.

Hutchinson (1965) described the environment as a stage where plant and animal species play out the theater of life. In many ecosystems, such as boreal and tropical forests on land, or kelp forests in the ocean, plants form much of the three-dimensional structure that forms the ecological stage where individual growth, survival, predation, competition, and community dynamics occur. In streams and rivers, it is the physical structure of the channel itself that forms the dominant habitat template that constrains ecological processes and the adaptations of aquatic organisms. All aspects of the ecology of aquatic organisms – from behavior, growth, and reproduction to avoiding predation – are mediated by the attributes of the flowing water environment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackers, P. and White, W. R. (1973). Sediment transport: new approach and analysis. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 99(hy11), 2041–60.Google Scholar
Airy, G. B. (1841) Tides and waves. In Encyclopaedia Metropolitana , ed. Rose, H. J. et al. Mixed Sciences, 3, 1817–45.Google Scholar
Allan, J. and Castillo, M. (2007). Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters,. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Andrews, E. D. (1980). Effective and bankfull discharge of streams in the Yampa River basin, Colorado and Wyoming. Journal of Hydrology, 46, 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, E. D. (1983). Entrainment of gravel from naturally sorted riverbed material. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 94, 1225–31.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. D. and Nislow, K. H. (2006). Critical habitat during the transition from maternal provisioning in freshwater fish, with emphasis on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta). Journal of Zoology, 269(4), 403–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, P. J. and Ferguson, R. I. (1989). Size‐selective entrainment of bed load in gravel bed streams. Water Resources Research, 25(4), 627–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnold, R. A. (1980). An empirical correlation of bedload transport rates in flumes and natural rivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 372 (1751), 453–73.Google Scholar
Benson, M. A. and Thomas, D. M. (1966). A definition of dominant discharge. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 11(2), 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, P. A., Bilby, R. E., Bryant, M. D. et al. (1987). Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future. In Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions, ed. Salo, E. O. and Cundy, T. W.. Seattle, WA: College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, pp. 143–90.
Bizzi, S. and Lerner, D. N. (2013). The use of stream power as an indicator of channel sensitivity to erosion and deposition processes. River Research and Applications, 31(1), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanckaert, K., Garcia, X.-F., Ricardo, A.-M., Chen, Q. and Pusch, M. T. (2013). The role of turbulence in the hydraulic environment of benthic invertebrates. Ecohydrology, 6(4), 700–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocchiola, D., Rulli, M. C. and Rosso, R. (2006). Transport of large woody debris in the presence of obstacles. Geomorphology, 76(1), 166–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braudrick, C. A. and Grant, G. E. (2001). Transport and deposition of large woody debris in streams: a flume experiment. Geomorphology, 41(4), 263–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumner, G. W. (2010). HEC-RAS River Analysis System. Hydraulic Reference Manual. Version 4.1. Davis, CA: Hydrologic Engineering Center.
Carling, P. A. (1983). Threshold of coarse sediment transport in broad and narrow natural streams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 8, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, M. (1985). Bed load in gravel-bed rivers: observed phenomena and implications for computation. Proceedings, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering Annual Meeting, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 2, 17–37.Google Scholar
Church, M. (1992). Channel morphology and typology. In The Rivers Handbook 1. Oxford, Blackwell Science, pp. 126–143.
Crawford, C. G. (1991). Estimation of suspended-sediment rating curves and mean suspended-sediment loads. Journal of Hydrology, 129(1), 331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, K. W. (1974). Structure and function of stream ecosystems. BioScience, 24(11), 631–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, B. C. and Church, M. (2011). A rational sediment transport scaling relation based on dimensionless stream power. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 36(7), 901–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, B. C. and Hassan, M. A. (2013). Scale‐dependent interactions between wood and channel dynamics: modeling jam formation and sediment storage in gravel‐bed streams. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118(4), 2500–8.Google Scholar
Einstein, H. A. ( 1950 ). The Bedload Function for Sediment Transportation in Open Channels . Technical Bulletin No. 1026. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
Enders, E. C., Boisclair, D. and Roy, A. G. (2003). The effect of turbulence on the cost of swimming for juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 60(9), 1149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelund, F. and Hansen, E. (1967). A Monograph on Sediment Transport in Alluvial Streams. Copenhagen: Teknisk forlag.
Ferguson, R. I. (2007). Flow resistance equations for gravel- and boulder-bed streams. Water Resources Research, 43, doi:10.1029/2006WR005422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, R. I. and Church, M. (2004). A simple universal equation for grain settling velocity. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 74(6), 933–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetherston, K. L., Naiman, R. J. and Bilby, R. E. (1995). Large woody debris, physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific Northwest. Geomorphology, 13, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbins, C., Vericat, D. and Batalla, R. J. (2007). When is stream invertebrate drift catastrophic? The role of hydraulics and sediment transport in initiating drift during flood events. Freshwater Biology, 52(12), 2369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B. and Church, M. (1989). An assessment of bed load sediment transport formulae for gravel bed rivers. Water Resources Research, 25(6), 1161–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurnell, A. M., Piegay, H., Swanson, F. J. and Gregory, S. V. (2002). Large wood and fluvial processes. Freshwater Biology, 47(4), 601–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haschenburger, J. K. and Wilcock, P. R. (2003). Partial transport in a natural gravel bed channel. Water Resources Research, 39 (1), doi:10.1029/2002WR001532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, M. A., Hogan, D. L., Bird, S. A. et al. (2005). Spatial and temporal dynamics of wood in headwater streams of the Pacific Northwest. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 41(4), 899–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauer, C., Unfer, G., Graf, W. et al. (2011). Hydro-morphologically related variance in benthic drift and its importance for numerical habitat modelling. Hydrobiologia, 683(1), 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. and Jowett, I. (1994). Microhabitat models of large drift-feeding brown trout in three New Zealand Rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 14, 710–25.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open Channel Flow. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
Hickin, E. J. (1984). Vegetation and river channel dynamics. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 28(2), 111–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinch, S. and Rand, P. (2000). Optimal swimming speeds and forward-assisted propulsion: energy-conserving behaviors of upriver-migrating adult salmon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 2470–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1965). The Ecological Theatre and the Evolutionary Play. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hynes, H. (1970). The ecology of running waters. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Jackson, W. L. and Beschta, R. L. (1982). A model of two‐phase bedload transport in an Oregon coast range stream. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 7(6), 517–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, S. (1985). Identification of stream drift mechanisms: an experimental and observational approach. Ecology, 66(6), 1749–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komar, P. D. (1987). Selective grain entrainment by a current from a bed of mixed sizes: a reanalysis. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 57(2), 203–11.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. and Hildrew, A. (1993). Characterizing in-stream flow refugia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50, 1663–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, E. W. (1957). A Study of the Shape of Channels Formed by Natural Streams Flowing in Erodible Material. Omaha, NB: US Army Engineer Division, Missouri River.
Leopold, L. B. and Maddock, T. (1953). The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and Some Physiographic Implications. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, No. 252. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Leopold, L. B. and Wolman, M. G. (1957). River Channel Patterns: Braided, Meandering, and Straight. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, No. 282-b. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Liao, J. C., Beal, D., Lauder, G. V. and Triantafyllou, M. (2003a). The Karman gait: novel body kinematics of rainbow trout swimming in a vortex street. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, 1059–73.Google Scholar
Liao, J. C., Beal, D. N., Lauder, G. V. and Triantafyllou, M. (2003b). Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science, 302, 1566–9.Google Scholar
Lienkaemper, G. W. and Swanson, F. J. (1987). Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 150–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, J. J., Lapointe, M. F., Roy, A. G. and Ketterling, D. B. (2013). The effects of sand abrasion of a predominantly stable stream bed on periphyton biomass losses. Ecohydrology, 6, 689–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackin, J. H. (1948). Concept of the graded river. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 59, 463–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magilligan, F. J. (1992). Thresholds and the spatial variability of flood power during extreme floods. Geomorphology, 5, 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. R. and Townsend, C. R. (1998). Do different predators affect distance, direction, and destination of movements by a stream mayfly? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55(8), 1954–60.Google Scholar
McLean, D. G., Church, M. and Tassone, B. (1999). Sediment transport along lower Fraser River. Water Resources Research, 35 (8), 2533–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meffe, G. (1984). Effects of abiotic disturbance on coexistence of predator-prey fish species. Ecology, 65 (5), 1525–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Peter, R. and Müller, R. (1948). Formulas for bedload transport. Proceedings 2nd Meeting International Association of Hydraulic Research, Stockholm, 39–64.
Moore, J. W. (2006). Animal ecosystem engineers in streams. BioScience, 56(3), 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. M. and Gregory, S. V. (1988). Summer habitat utilization and ecology of cutthroat trout fry (Salmo clarki) in Cascade Mountain streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45(11), 1921–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M., Heifetz, J., Johnson, F. W., Koski, K. and Thedinga, J. F. (1986). Effects of clear-cut logging with and without buffer strips on juvenile salmonids in Alaskan streams. Canadian journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43, 1521–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, R., Johnston, C. and Kelley, J. (1988). Alteration of North American streams by beaver. BioScience, 38, 753–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanson, G. C. and Croke, J. C. (1992). A genetic classification of floodplains. Geomorphology, 4, 459–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanson, G. C. and Knighton, A. D. (1996). Anabranching rivers: their cause, character and classification. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21, 217–39.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickelson, T. T., Rodgers, J. D., Johnson, S. L. and Solazzi, M. F. (1992). Seasonal changes in habitat use by juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Oregon coastal streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 783–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. (1991). Selective sorting and abrasion of river gravel. II: Applications. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(2), 150–71.Google Scholar
Parker, G. (1990). Surface-based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 28(4), 417–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. and Klingeman, P. C. (1982). On why gravel bed rivers are paved. Water Resources Research, 18(5), 1409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Klingeman, P. C. and McLean, D. G. (1982). Bedload and size distribution in paved gravel-bed streams, J. Hydraul. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 108(HY4), 544–71.Google Scholar
Peakall, J., Ashworth, P. and Best, J. (1996). Physical modelling in fluvial geomorphology: principles, applications and unresolved issues. In The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology, ed. Rhoads, B. L. and Thorn, C.. Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp. 221–253.
Pickup, G. and Warner, R. F. (1976). Effects of hydrologic regime on magnitude and frequency of dominant discharge. Journal of Hydrology, 29, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, M., Pess, G., Beechie, T. and Montgomery, D. (2004). The importance of beaver ponds to coho salmon production in the Stillaguamish River basin, Washington, USA. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24, 749–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pujolar, J. M., Vincenzi, S., Zane, L. et al. (2011). The effect of recurrent floods on genetic composition of marble trout populations. PloS One, 6(9), e23822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roghair, C., Dolloff, C. and Underwood, M. (2002). Response of a brook trout population and instream habitat to a catastrophic flood and debris flow. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 131, 718–30.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. S., Bouwes, N., Wall, C. E. and Naman, S. M. (2014). Successes, failures, and opportunities in the practical application of drift-foraging models. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 97, 551–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoklitsch, A. (1934). Der geschiebetrieb und die geschiebefracht. Wasserkraft Wasserwirtschaft, 4, 1–7.Google Scholar
Sear, D. A., Frostick, L. B., Rollinson, G. and Lisle, T. E. (2008). The significance and mechanics of fine-sediment infiltration and accumulation in gravel spawning beds. In Salmonid Spawning Habitat in Rivers: Physical Controls, Biological Responses, and Approaches to Remediation, ed. Sear, D. A. and CeVries, P.. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp 149–73.
Seo, J. I. and Nakamura, F. (2009). Scale-dependent controls upon the fluvial export of large wood from river catchments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34(6), 786–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, D. B. and Richardson, E. V. (1963). Forms of bed roughness in alluvial channels. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 128(1), 284–302.Google Scholar
Solazzi, M. F., Nickelson, T. E., Johnson, S. L. and Rodgers, J. D. (2000). Effects of increasing winter rearing habitat on abundance of salmonids in two coastal Oregon streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 906–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statzner, B. (2012). Geomorphological implications of engineering bed sediments by lotic animals. Geomorphology, 157–158, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statzner, B., Arens, M., Champagne, J.-Y., Morel, R. and Herouin, E. (1999). Silk‐producing stream insects and gravel erosion: significant biological effects on critical shear stress. Water Resources Research, 35, 3495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttle, K., Power, M., Levine, J. and McNeeley, C. (2004). How fine sediment in riverbeds impairs growth and survival of juvenile salmonids. Ecological Applications, 14(4), 969–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, M. and Liao, J. C. (2011). Rainbow trout consume less oxygen in turbulence: the energetics of swimming behaviors at different speeds. Journal of Experimental Biology, 214, 1428–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Berg, J. H. (1995). Prediction of alluvial channel pattern of perennial rivers. Geomorphology, 12, 259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rijn, L. C. (1984a). Sediment transport, part I: bed load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(10), 1431–56.Google Scholar
Van Rijn, L. C. (1984b). Sediment transport, part II: suspended load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(11), 1613–41.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. B. and Webster, J. R. (1996). The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annual Review of Entomology, 41(131), 115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walling, D. E. (1977). Assessing the accuracy of suspended sediment rating curves for a small basin. Water Resources Research, 13(3), 531–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, K. X. and Tucker, G. E. (1999). Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104, 17661–74.Google Scholar
Wilcock, P. R. and Crowe, J. C. (2003). Surface-based transport model for mixed-size sediment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129(2), 120–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcock, P. R. and McArdell, B. W. (1993). Surface-based fractional transport rates: mobilization thresholds and partial transport of a sand-gravel sediment. Water Resources Research, 29(4), 1297–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, M. G. and Miller, J. P. (1960). Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. Journal of Geology, 69, 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×