Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Beyond the Monastery WallsLay Men and Women in Early Medieval Legal Formularies, pp. 356 - 376Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Baluze, E., Capitularia regum Francorum. Additae sunt Marculfi Monachi et aliorum Formulae veteres, et Notae doctissimorum virorum, Tome 2 (Paris, 1677).Google Scholar
Bernard, A. and Bruel, A., eds., Recueil des chartes de l’abbaye de Cluny, 3 vols. (Paris, 1876–84).Google Scholar
Beyer, H., ed., Urkundenbuch zur Geschichte der, jetzt die Preussischen Regierungsbezirke Coblenz und Trier bildenden mittelrheinischen Territorien, vol. 1 (Coblenz, 1860).Google Scholar
Beyerle, F. and Buchner, R., eds., Lex Ribuaria, MGH LL nat. Germ. 3.2 (Hanover, 1954).Google Scholar
Bignon, J., ed., Marculfi monachi formularum libri duo. Item veteres formulae incerti auctoris ex bibliotheca regis (Paris, 1613).Google Scholar
Blume, F., Lachmann, K., and Rudorff, A., eds., Die Schriften der römischen Feldmesser, vol. I (Berlin, 1848).Google Scholar
Bruckner, A. and Marichal, R., eds., Chartae latinae antiquiores: Facsimile-Edition of the Latin Charters prior to the Ninth Century, vol. 2 (Olten, 1956).Google Scholar
Campbell, B., The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary (London, 2000).Google Scholar
Courtois, J., ed., Chartes de l’abbaye de Saint-Étienne de Dijon (VIIIe, IXe, Xe et XIe siècles) (Paris, 1908).Google Scholar
de Rozière, E., ed., Formules inédites publiées après un manuscrit de la bibliothèque de Strasbourg (Paris, 1851).Google Scholar
de Rozière, E., ed., Recueil général des formules usitées dans l’empire des Francs du Ve au Xe siècle, 3 vols. (Paris, 1859–71).Google Scholar
Dhuoda, Handbook for William: A Carolingian Woman’s Counsel for Her Son, trans. Neel, C. (Washington, DC, 1999).Google Scholar
Dupuy, P. and Dupuy, J., Catalogus bibliothecae Thuanae, ed. Boulliau, I. and Quesnel, J. (Paris, 1679).Google Scholar
Dutton, P. E., ed. and trans., Charlemagne’s Courtier: The Complete Einhard (Peterborough, ON, 1998).Google Scholar
“Formeln von Angers (Betaversion),” Formulae–Litterae–Chartae: Frühmittlelaterliche Formelsammlungen project, University of Hamburg, werkstatt.formulae.uni-hamburg.de/corpus/urn:cts:formulae:andecavensis?lang=eng.Google Scholar
Germer-Durand, E., ed., Cartulaire du chapitre de l’église cathédrale Notre-Dame de Nîmes (Nîmes, 1874).Google Scholar
Gregory of Tours, Libri Historiarum X, ed. Krusch, B. and Levison, W., MGH SSRM 1.1 (Hanover, 1951).Google Scholar
Gundlach, W., Dümmler, E., Arndt, W., and Rodenberg, C., eds., MGH Epp. 3 (Berlin, 1892).Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville, The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville, trans. Barney, S. A, Lewis, W. J, Beach, J. A, and Berghof, O. (Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville, Isidori Hispalensis Episcopi Etymologiarum sive Originum Libri XX, 2 vols., ed. Lindsay, W. M (Oxford, 1911).Google Scholar
Jacob, W. and Hanslik, R., eds., Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 71 (Vienna, 1952).Google Scholar
King, P. D., trans., Charlemagne: Translated Sources (Lambrigg, Kendal, Cumbria, 1987).Google Scholar
Kölzer, Theo, ed., Die Urkunden Ludwigs des Frommen, 3 vols., MGH DD LdF, Tomes 1–3 (Wiesbaden, 2016).Google Scholar
Levillain, L., Receuil des actes de Pépin I et Pépin II, rois d’Aquitaine (814–848) (Paris, 1926).Google Scholar
Longnon, A., ed., Polyptyque de l’abbaye de Saint-Germain des Prés, vol. 2 (Paris, 1886).Google Scholar
Lowe, E. A., Codices Latini Antiquiores: A Palaeographical Guide to Latin Manuscripts prior to the Ninth Century, VI (Oxford, 1953).Google Scholar
Mansi, G. D., ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio (Florence/Venice, 1759–98).Google Scholar
Meyer-Marthaler, E., ed., Die Rechtsquellen des Kantons Graubünden: Lex Romana Curiensis (Aarau, 1959).Google Scholar
Mommsen, T., ed., Libri Pontificales, Part I, MGH Gesta Pontificum Romanorum 1 (Berlin, 1898).Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. and Krueger, P., eds. The Digest of Justinian, trans. Watson, A., vol. 1 (Philadelphia, 1985).Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. and Meyer, P. M., eds., Theodosiani libri XVI cum Constitutionibus Sirmondianis et Leges novellae ad Theodosianum pertinentes (Berlin, 1905).Google Scholar
Mordek, H., Zechiel-Eckes, K., and Glatthaar, M., eds., Die Admonitio Generalis Karls des Großen, MGH Fontes iuris XVI (Hanover, 2012).Google Scholar
Munier, C., ed., Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, vol. 149: Concilia Africae a. 345–525 (Turnhout, 1974).Google Scholar
Nithard, “Nithardi historiarum libri IIII/Nithard Vier Bücher Geschichten,” in Rau, R., ed., Quellen zur karolingischen Reichsgeschichte, Part I (Darmstadt, 1987), 383–461.Google Scholar
Nithard, “Nithard’s Histories,” in Scholz, B. W. and Rogers, B. (trans.), Carolingian Chronicles: Royal Frankish Annals and Nithard’s Histories (Ann Arbor, 1972).Google Scholar
Nolden, R., ed., Das “Goldene Buch” von Prüm (Liber aureus Prumiensis): Faksimile, Übersetzung der Urkunden, Einband (Prüm, 1997).Google Scholar
Pardessus, J. M., ed., Diplomata chartae, epistolae, leges aliaque instrumenta ad res Gallo-Francicas spectantia, 2 vols. (Paris, 1843–49).Google Scholar
Pharr, C., trans., The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions (Princeton, NJ, 1952).Google Scholar
Prou, M. and Vidier, A., eds., Recueil des chartes de l’abbaye de Saint-Benoît-sur-Loire, 2 vols. (Paris, 1907–12).Google Scholar
Rath, G. and Reiter, E., eds., Das älteste Traditionsbuch des Klosters Mondsee (Linz, 1989).Google Scholar
Riedinger, R., ed., Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum, Series Secunda, I: Concilium Lateranense a. 649 celebratum (Berlin, 1984).Google Scholar
Rio, A., trans., The Formularies of Angers and Marculf: Two Merovingian Legal Handbooks (Liverpool, 2008).Google Scholar
Rockinger, L., ed., “Drei Formelsammlungen aus der Zeit der Karolinger,” in Quellen und Erörterungen zur bayerischen und deutschen Geschichte, vol. 7 (Munich, 1858), 127–68.Google Scholar
Schaff, P., ed. and trans., A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Second Series (Edinburgh, 1894).Google Scholar
Schwerin, C. Freiherr von, ed., Lex Saxonum und Lex Thuringorum, MGH Fontes iuris IV (Hanover, 1918).Google Scholar
Sydow, J., “Neue Fragmenta der Formulae S. Emmerami,” Deutsches Archiv, 13 (1957), 525–29.Google Scholar
Tessier, G., ed., Receuil des actes de Charles II le Chauve, roi de France, 3 vols. (Paris, 1943–55).Google Scholar
Tjäder, J.-O., ed., Die nichtliterarischen lateinischen Papyri Italiens aus der Zeit 445–700, vol. 1 (Lund, 1955).Google Scholar
Widemann, J., ed., Die Traditionen des Hochstifts Regensburg und des Klosters S. Emmeram (Aalen, 1969; repr. of original Munich, 1943).Google Scholar
Zeumer, K., Formulae Merowingici et Karolini Aevi, MGH Legum sectio V (Hanover, 1886).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M., “Un formulaire du Xème siècle conserve a Ripoll,” Favienta 4 (1982), 25–86.Google Scholar
Airlie, S., “The Aristocracy,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History II, 431–50.Google Scholar
Airlie, S., “Bonds of Power and Bonds of Association in the Court Circle of Louis the Pious,” in Godman, P. and Collins, R., eds., Charlemagne’s Heir: New Perspectives on the Reign of Louis the Pious (Oxford, 1990), 191–204.Google Scholar
Althoff, G., Amicitiae und Pacta: Bündnis, Einung, Politik und Gebetsgedenken im beginnenden 10. Jahrhundert (Hanover, 1992).Google Scholar
Althoff, G., Verwandte, Freunde und Getreue. Zum politischen Stellenwert der Gruppenbindungen im früheren Mittelalter (Darmstadt, 1990).Google Scholar
Anderson, T., “Roman Military Colonies in Gaul, Salian Ethnogenesis and the Forgotten Meaning of Pactus Legis Salicae 59.5,” Early Medieval Europe 4 (1995), 129–44.Google Scholar
Angenendt, A., “Cartam offerre super altare. Zur Liturgisierung von Rechtsvorgängen,” Frühmittelalterliche Studien 36 (2002), 133–58.Google Scholar
Aubin, H., “Vom Absterben antiken Lebens im Frühmittelalter,” Antike und Abendland 3 (1948), 88–119.Google Scholar
Bachrach, D. S., “Continuity of Written Administration in the Late Carolingian East c. 887–911: The Royal Fisc,” Frühmittelalterliche Studien 42 (2008), 109–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, D. S., “Exercise of Royal Power in Early Medieval Europe: The Case of Otto the Great, 936–73,” Early Medieval Europe 17 (2009), 389–419.Google Scholar
Banniard, M. “Language and Communication in Carolingian Europe,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History II, 695–708.Google Scholar
Barbier, J., “Dotes, donations après rapt et donations mutuelles. Les transferts patrimoniaux dans le royaume franc d’après les formules (VIe–IXe siècle),” in Bougard, F. et al., eds., Dots et douaires, 353–88.Google Scholar
Barbier, J., “Testaments et pratique testamentaire dans le royaume franc (VIe–VIIIe siècle),” in Bougard, F. et al., eds., Sauver son âme, 7–79.Google Scholar
Barthélemy, D., “Une crise de l’écrit? Observations sur des actes de Saint-Aubin d’Angers (XIe siècle),” Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes 155 (1997), 95–117.Google Scholar
Barthélemy, D., The Serf, the Knight, and the Historian, trans. Edwards, G. R (Ithaca, NY, 2009).Google Scholar
Barthélemy, D., La société dans le comté de Vendôme de l’an mil au XIVe siècle (Paris, 1993).Google Scholar
Barthélemy, D. and White, S., “Debate: The Feudal Revolution,” Past and Present 152 (1996), 196–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baus, K., Beck, H.-G., Ewig, E., and Vogt, H. J., The Imperial Church from Constantine to the Early Middle Ages, trans. Biggs, A (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Bautier, R.-H., Avella-Widhalm, G., and Auty, R., eds., Lexikon des Mittelalters, 9 vols. (Munich, 1980–98).Google Scholar
Besson, A., Bibliotheca Legum: A Database on Carolingian Secular Law Texts, www.leges.uni-koeln.de/en/.Google Scholar
Besson, A., Constitutio Antoniniana. L’universalisation de la citoyenneté Romaine au 3e siècle (Basel, 2020).Google Scholar
Bibolet, F. “Bibliotheca Pithoeana. Les manuscrits de Pithou. Une histoire de fraternité et d’amité,” in Nebbiai-Dalla Guarda, D. and Genest, J.-F., eds., Du copiste au collectionneur. Mélanges d’histoire des textes et des bibliothèques en l’honneur d’André Vernet (Turnhout, 1998), 497–521.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R., “Constitutio Antoniniana,” in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Brill’s New Pauly, vol. 3 (Leiden, 2003), col. 726.Google Scholar
Bischoff, B., “Die Hofbibliothek unter Ludwig der Fromme,” in Bischoff, B., ed., Mittelalterliche Studien. Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur Schriftkunde und Literaturgeschichte, III (Stuttgart, 1981), 170–86.Google Scholar
Bischoff, B., Katalog der festländischen Handschriften des neunten Jahrhunderts (mit Ausnahme der wisigotischen), 3 vols. (vol. 2–3 ed. Ebersperger, B.) (Wiesbaden, 1998–2014).Google Scholar
Bischoff, B., Salzburger Formelbücher und Briefe aus Tassilonischer und Karolingischer Zeit (Munich, 1973).Google Scholar
Bischoff, B., Die südostdeutschen Schreibschulen und Bibliotheken in der Karolingerzeit, vol. 1: Die bayrischen Diözesen (Leipzig, 1940).Google Scholar
Bisson, T. N., The Crisis of the Twelfth Century: Power, Lordship, and the Origins of European Government (Princeton, NJ, 2009).Google Scholar
Boswell, J., The Kindness of Strangers: The Abandonment of Children in Western Europe from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Bougard, F., Feller, L., and Le Jan, R., eds., Dots et douaires dans le haut moyen âge (Rome, 2002).Google Scholar
Bougard, F., La Rocca, C., and Le Jan, R., eds., Sauver son âme et se perpétuer. Transmission du patrimoine et mémoire au haut moyen âge (Rome, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowersock, G. W., Brown, P., and Grabar, O., eds., Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World (Cambridge, MA, 1999).Google Scholar
Bowman, J. A., Shifting Landmarks: Property, Proof, and Dispute in Catalonia around the Year 1000 (Ithaca, NY, 2004).Google Scholar
Brown, M. Understanding Illuminated Manuscripts: A Guide to Technical Terms (Los Angeles, 2018).Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “Conflict and Conflict Records in the Formulae Visigothicae,” in Alfonso, I., Andrade, J., and Marques, A. E., eds., Records and Processes of Dispute Settlement in Early Medieval Societies: Iberia and Beyond (Leiden, in press).Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “Conflict, Letters, and Personal Relationships in the Carolingian Formula Collections,” Law and History Review 25 (2007), 323–44.Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “On the Gesta municipalia and the Public Validation of Documents in Frankish Europe,” Speculum 87 (2012), 345–75.Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “The Idea of Empire in Carolingian Bavaria,” in MacLean, S. and Weiler, B., eds., Representations of Power in Medieval Germany, 800–1500 (Turnhout, 2006), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “Die karolingischen Formelsammlungen – warum existieren sie?,” in Erhart, P. et al., eds., Die Privaturkunden, 95–101.Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “Laypeople and Documents in the Frankish Formula Collections,” in Brown, W. C et al., eds., Documentary Culture, 125–51.Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “Old Media Put to New Uses: Legal Form Books in Carolingian Europe,” The Medieval Globe 3.1 (2017), 93–128.Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], Unjust Seizure: Conflict, Interest, and Authority in an Early Medieval Society (Ithaca, NY, 2001).Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “The Use of Norms in Disputes in Early Medieval Bavaria,” Viator 30 (1999), 15–39.Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “Wergeld in the Carolingian Formula Collections,” in Esders, S., Nijdam, H., and Bothe, L, eds., Wergild, Compensation and Penance. The Monetary Logic of Early Medieval Conflict Resolution (Leiden, 2021), 261–76.Google Scholar
Brown, W. [C.], “When Documents Are Destroyed or Lost: Lay People and Archives in the Early Middle Ages,” Early Medieval Europe 11 (2002), 337–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. C., Costambeys, M., Innes, M. and Kosto, A. J., eds., Documentary Culture and the Laity in the Early Middle Ages (Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Brown, W. C. and de Pee, C., “Medieval Media Revolutions: An Exchange,” The Medieval Globe 3 (2017), 169–77.Google Scholar
Brown, W. C. and Górecki, P., “What Conflict Means: The Making of Medieval Conflict Studies in the United States, 1970–2000,” in Brown, W. C and Górecki, P., eds., Conflict in Medieval Europe (Aldershot, 2003), 1–35.Google Scholar
Bruguière, M.-B., “Réflexions sur la crise de la justice en Occident à la fin de l’Antiquité: l’apport de la littérature,” in La Giustizia (Secoli V–VIII), 165–223.Google Scholar
Brunhölzl, F., Studien zum geistigen Leben in Passau im achten und neunten Jahrhundert (Munich, 2000).Google Scholar
Buchner, R., Deutschlands Geschichtsquellen im Mittelalter; Beiheft: die Rechtsquellen (Weimar, 1953).Google Scholar
Bührer-Thierry, G., “Femmes donatrices, femmes bénéficiaires: les échanges entre époux en Bavière du VIIIe au Xe siècle,” in Bougard, F. et al., eds., Dots et douaires, 329–47.Google Scholar
Calboli, G., “Festus and Roman Law (Lex Romana),” lecture given at the Volterra–Festus Colloquium, “Law, Lexica and Libraries: Italy and Francia between the sixth and eleventh centuries,” University College London, June 21, 2013.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Brill’s New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World: Antiquity, 15 vols. (Leiden, 2002–10).Google Scholar
Carpenter, J., ed., “Glossary,” in Davies, W. and Fouracre, P., eds., Settlement of Disputes, 269–76.Google Scholar
Choy, R. S., Intercessory Prayer and the Monastic Ideal in the Time of the Carolingian Reform (Oxford, 2016).Google Scholar
Classen, P., “Fortleben und Wandel spätrömischen Urkundenwesens im frühen Mittelalter,” in Classen, P., ed., Recht und Schrift im Mittelalter (Sigmaringen, 1977), 13–54.Google Scholar
Coleman, E., “Medieval Marriage Characteristics: A Neglected Factor in the History of Medieval Serfdom,” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2 (1971), 205–19.Google Scholar
Constable, G., Letters and Letter-Collections. Typologie des sources du moyen âge occidental, fasc. 17, A-II (Turnhout, 1976).Google Scholar
Costambeys, M., “Disputes and Documents in Early Medieval Italy,” in Cooper, K. and Leyser, C., eds., Making Early Medieval Societies: Conflict and Belonging in the Latin West, 300–1200 (Cambridge, 2016), 125–54.Google Scholar
Costambeys, M., “The laity, the clergy, the scribes and their archives: the documentary record of eighth and ninth-century Italy,” in Brown, W. C et al., eds., Documentary Culture, 231–58.Google Scholar
Costambeys, M., Power and Patronage in Early Medieval Italy: Local Society, Italian Politics and the Abbey of Farfa, c. 700–900 (Cambridge, 2007).Google Scholar
Cubitt, C., Rosenwein, B. H., Airlie, S., Garrison, M., and Larrington, C., “The History of Emotions: A Debate,” Early Medieval Europe 10 (2001): 225–56.Google Scholar
Davies, W., “Forgery in the Cartulaire de Redon,” in Brittany in the Early Middle Ages (Farnham, 2009), 265–74.Google Scholar
Davies, W., “People and Places in Dispute in Ninth-Century Brittany,” in Davies, W. and Fouracre, P., eds., The Settlement of Disputes, 65–84.Google Scholar
Davies, W., “On Servile Status in the Early Middle Ages,” in Bush, M. L., ed., Serfdom and Slavery: Studies in Legal Bondage (London, 1996).Google Scholar
Davies, W., Small Worlds: The Village Community in Early Medieval Brittany (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Davies, W. and Fouracre, P., “Conclusion: The rôle of writing in the resolution and recording of disputes,” in Davies, W. and Fouracre, P, eds., The Settlement of Disputes, 207–14.Google Scholar
Davies, W., and Fouracre, P.,eds., Property and Power in the Early Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Davies, W., and Fouracre, P., eds., The Settlement of Disputes in Early Medieval Europe (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Declercq, G., “Les Formulae Salicae Lindenbrogianae et l’acte privé dans le nord-ouest du royaume franc à l’époque carolingienne,” in Erhart, P. et al., eds., Die Privaturkunden, 135–44.Google Scholar
Declercq, G., “Between Legal Action and Performance: The firmatio of Charters in the Early Middle Ages,” in Mostert, M. and Barnwell, P. S, eds., Medieval Legal Process, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declercq, G., “Between Seligenstadt and St. Bavo’s Abbey, Ghent: Making a Collection out of Einhard’s Letters,” Viator 49 (2019), 47–87.Google Scholar
de Jong, M., “Carolingian Monasticism: The Power of Prayer,” in R. McKitterick, ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History II, 622–53.Google Scholar
Depreux, P., “Le Comte Matfrid d’Orléans (av. 815–836),” Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes 152 (1994), 331–74.Google Scholar
Depreux, P., “Une faide exemplaire? À propos des aventures de Sichaire: vengeance et pacification aux temps Mérovingiens,” in Barthélemy, D., Bougard, F., and Le Jan, R., eds., La Vengeance, 400–1200 (Rome, 2006), 65–85.Google Scholar
Depreux, P., “La tradition manuscrite des ‘Formules de Tours’ et la diffusion des modèles d’actes aux VIIIe et IXe siècles,” Annales de Bretagne et des Pays de l’Ouest 111 (2004), 55–71.Google Scholar
de Rosanbo, L., “Pierre Pithou Biographie,” Revue du seizième siècle 15 (1928), 279–305.Google Scholar
De Smet, I. A. R., Thuanus: The Making of Jacques-Auguste de Thou (1553–1617) (Geneva, 2006).Google Scholar
Devroey, J.-P., “Men and Women in Early Medieval Serfdom: The Ninth-Century North Frankish Evidence,” Past and Present 166 (2000), 3–30.Google Scholar
Devroey, J.-P., Puissants et misérables: système social et monde paysan dans l’Europe des Francs (VIe–IXe siècles) (Brussels, 2006).Google Scholar
Dilke, O. A. W., The Roman Land Surveyors: An Introduction to the Agrimensores (Newton Abbot, 1971).Google Scholar
Duby, G., La société au XIe et XIIe siècles dans la région mâconnaise, 2nd ed. (Paris, 1971 – first published 1953).Google Scholar
Duby, G., The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined, trans. Goldhammer, A. (Chicago, 1982).Google Scholar
Du Cange, C. D., Glossarium mediae et infimae Latinitatis, ed. Favre, L. (Paris, 1883–87).Google Scholar
Duhaime’s Encyclopedia of Law, online, www.duhaime.org.Google Scholar
du Plessis, P. J., Ando, C., and Tuori, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society (Oxford, 2016).Google Scholar
Elsakkers, M., “Raptus ultra Rhenum: Early Ninth-Century Saxon Laws on Abduction and Rape,” Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 52 (1999), 27–53.Google Scholar
Epp, V., Amicitia: Zur Geschichte personaler, sozialer, politischer und geistlicher Beziehungen im frühen Mittelalter (Stuttgart, 1999).Google Scholar
Erhart, P., Heidecker, K., and Zeller, B., eds., Die Privaturkunden der Karolingerzeit (Dietikon-Zürich, 2009).Google Scholar
Esders, S., “Early Medieval Use of Late Antique Legal Texts: The Case of the manumissio in ecclesia,” in Kano, O., ed., Configuration du texte en histoire (Nagoya, 2012), 55–65.Google Scholar
Esders, S., Die Formierung der Zensualität. Zur kirchlichen Transformation des spätrömischen Patronatswesens im früheren Mittelalter (Ostfildern, 2010).Google Scholar
Esders, S., “Roman Law as an Identity Marker in Post-Roman Gaul (5th‒9th Centuries),” in Pohl, W, Gantner, C., Grifoni, C., and Pollheimer-Mohaupt, M., eds., Transformations of Romanness: Early Medieval Regions and Identities (Berlin, 2018), 325–44.Google Scholar
Esders, S., Römische Rechtstradition und merowingisches Königtum. Zum Rechtscharakter politischer Herrschaft in Burgund im 6. und 7. Jahrhundert (Göttingen, 1997).Google Scholar
Esders, S., ed., Rechtsverständnis und Konfliktbewältigung. Gerichtliche und außergerichtliche Strategien im Mittelalter (Cologne, 2007).Google Scholar
Everett, N., “Lay Documents and Archives in Early Medieval Spain and Italy, c. 400–700,” in Brown, W. C et al., eds., Documentary Culture, 63–94.Google Scholar
Everett, N., “Scribes and Charters in Lombard Italy,” Studi Medievali 41 (2000), 39–83.Google Scholar
Ewig, E., “Das Fortleben römischer Institutionen in Gallien und Germanien,” in Atsma, H., ed., Eugen Ewig, Spätantikes und Fränkisches Gallien: Gesammelte Schriften (1952–1973) (Zurich, 1976), 409–34.Google Scholar
Faivre, A., The Emergence of the Laity in the Early Church, trans. Smith, D. (New York, 1990).Google Scholar
Feller, L., “‘Morgengabe,’ Dot, Tertia: Rapport Introductif,” in Bougard, F. et al., eds., Dots et douaires, 1–25.Google Scholar
Felten, F. J., Äbte und Laienäbte im Frankenreich: Studie zum Verhältnis von Staat und Kirche im früheren Mittelalter (Stuttgart, 1980).Google Scholar
Felten, F. J., “Laienabt,” in Lexikon des Mittelalters, vol. 5 (Munich and Zurich, 1991), 1617–18.Google Scholar
Fichtenau, H., “‘Carta’ et ‘Notitia’ en Bavière du VIIIe au Xe siècle,” Le Moyen Âge 69 (1963), 105–120.Google Scholar
Fichtenau, H., Das Urkundwesen in Österreich vom 8. bis zum frühen 13. Jahrhundert (Vienna, 1971).Google Scholar
Fouracre, P., “Carolingian Justice: The Rhetoric of Improvement and Contexts of Abuse,” in La Giustizia (Secoli V–VIII), 771–803.Google Scholar
Fouracre, P., “‘Placita’ and the Settlement of Disputes in Later Merovingian Francia,” in Davies, W. and Fouracre, P., eds., The Settlement of Disputes, 23–43.Google Scholar
Friend, N. E., “Holy Warriors and Bellicose Bishops: The Church and Warfare in Early Medieval Germany” (unpublished Master’s thesis, San José State University, 2015).Google Scholar
Gallagher, R., Roberts, E., and Tinti, F., eds., The Languages of Early Medieval Charters: Latin, Germanic Vernaculars, and the Written Word (Leiden, 2021).Google Scholar
Ganshof, F. L., Frankish Institutions under Charlemagne, trans. , B. and Lyon, M. (Providence, RI, 1968).Google Scholar
Ganz, D., “Tironian Notes,” in Coulson, F. T. and Babcock, R. G., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Latin Palaeography (Oxford, 2020), 295–7.Google Scholar
Garnier, C., Die Kultur der Bitte: Herrschaft und Kommunikation im mittelalterlichen Reich (Darmstadt, 2008).Google Scholar
Garnsey, P., “Roman Citizenship and Roman Law in the Late Empire,” in Swain, S. and Edwards, M., eds., Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire (Oxford, 2004), 133–55.Google Scholar
Garrison, M., “‘Send More Socks’: On Mentality and the Preservation Context of Medieval Letters,” in Mostert, M., ed., New Approaches to Medieval Communication (Turnhout, 1999), 69–99.Google Scholar
Garrison, M., “The Study of Emotions in History: Some Starting Points,” in Cubitt, C. et al., The History of Emotions: A Debate, 243–50.Google Scholar
Garver, V. L., Women and Aristocratic Culture in the Carolingian World (Ithaca, NY, 2009).Google Scholar
Geary, P. J., “Land, Language and Memory in Europe 700–1100,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Sixth series, 9 (1999), 169–84.Google Scholar
Geary, P. J., The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe (Princeton, NJ, 2002).Google Scholar
Geary, P. J., “Oblivion between Orality and Textuality in the Tenth Century,” in Althoff, G., Fried, J., and Geary, P. J., eds., Medieval Concepts of the Past: Ritual, Memory, Historiography (Cambridge, 2002), 111–22.Google Scholar
Geary, P. J., Phantoms of Remembrance: Memory and Oblivion at the End of the First Millennium (Princeton, NJ, 1994).Google Scholar
Geary, P. J., “Die Provence zur Zeit Karl Martells,” in Jarnut, J., Nonn, U., and Richter, M., eds., Karl Martell in seiner Zeit (Sigmaringen, 1994), 381–92.Google Scholar
Gibson, K., “The Carolingian World through Hagiography,” History Compass 13 (2015), 630–645.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C., “Old Age in the Dark Ages: The Status of Old Age during the Early Middle Ages,” Ageing and Society 29 (2009), 1065–84.Google Scholar
Gilsdorf, S., The Favor of Friends: Intercession and Aristocratic Politics in Carolingian and Ottonian Europe (Leiden, 2014).Google Scholar
Gizewski, C., “Dediticii,” in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Brill’s New Pauly, vol. 4 (Leiden, 2004), cols. 170–1.Google Scholar
Goetz, H.-W., “La circulation des biens à l’intérieur de la famille. Rapport introductive,” in Les transferts patrimoniaux en Europe occidentale, 861–79.Google Scholar
Goetz, H.-W., “Frauenbild und weibliche Lebensgestaltung im fränkischen Reich,” in Goetz, H.-W., ed., Weibliche Lebensgestaltung, 7–44.Google Scholar
Goetz, H.-W., Frauen im frühen Mittelalter. Frauenbild und Frauenleben im Frankenreich (Cologne, 1995).Google Scholar
Goetz, H.-W., Life in the Middle Ages: From the Seventh to the Thirteenth Century, ed. Rowan, S., trans. Wimmer, A (South Bend, IN, 1993).Google Scholar
Goetz, H.-W., “Serfdom and the Beginnings of a ‘Seigneurial System’ in the Carolingian Period: A Survey of the Evidence,” Early Medieval Europe 2 (1993), 29–51.Google Scholar
Goetz, H.-W., “Social and Military Institutions,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History II, 451–80.Google Scholar
Guyotjeannin, O., “‘Penuria scriptorum’: le mythe de l’anarchie documentaire dans la France du Nord (Xe – première moitié du XIe siècle),” Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes 155 (1997), 11–44.Google Scholar
Harries, J., “Church and State in the Notitia Galliarum,” The Journal of Roman Studies 68 (1978), 26–43.Google Scholar
Harries, J. and Wood, I., eds., The Theodosian Code: Studies in the Imperial Law of Late Antiquity (London, 1993).Google Scholar
Head, R. C., Making Archives in Early Modern Europe: Proof, Information, and Political Record-Keeping, 1400–1700 (Cambridge, 2019).Google Scholar
Hefele, C. J., A History of the Councils of the Church, from the Original Documents, vol. 2, trans. Oxenham, H. N. (Edinburgh, 1876).Google Scholar
Heidecker, K., “Charters as Texts and Objects in Judicial Actions: The Example of the Carolingian Private Charters of St Gall,” in Mostert, M. and Barnwell, P. S, eds., Medieval Legal Process, 39–53.Google Scholar
Heidecker, K., “Emploi de l’écrit dans les actes judiciaires: trois sondages en profondeur: Bourgogne, Souabe et Franconie (VIIIe–début XIIe siècles),” in Gasse-Grandjean, M-J. and Tock, B-M., eds., Les actes comme expression du pouvoir au Haut Moyen Age (Turnhout, 2003), 125–38.Google Scholar
Heidecker, K., “L’influence de la production documentaire sur les formulaires en Alamannia,” in Guyotjeannin, O., Morelle, L., and Scalfati, S. P., eds., Les formulaires. Compilation et circulation des modèles d’actes dans l’europe médiévale et moderne (Prague, 2018), 35–43.Google Scholar
Heidecker, K., “Introduction,” in Heidecker, K., ed., Charters and the Use of the Written Word in Medieval Society (Turnhout, 2000), 1–12.Google Scholar
Hellmuth, D., Frau und Besitz. Zum Handlungsspielraum von Frauen in Alamannien (700–940) (Sigmaringen, 1998).Google Scholar
Herman, J. “Sur quelques aspects du latin mérovingien: langue écrite et langue parlée,” in Iliescu, M. and Marxgut, W., eds., Latin vulgaire – Latin tardif III, Actes du troisiéme colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif (Innsbruck, 2–5 septembre 1991) (Tübingen, 1992), 173–86.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, B., “Die Gesta Municipalia in Römischer und Frühgermanischer Zeit” (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Marburg, 1904).Google Scholar
Hoeflich, M. H., “Regulation of Judicial Misconduct from Late Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages,” Law and History Review 2 (1984), 79–104.Google Scholar
Hudson, J., “Emotions in the Early Common Law (c. 1166–1215),” The Journal of Legal History 38 (2017), 130–54.Google Scholar
Humfress, C., “Laws’ Empire: Roman Universalism and Legal Practice,” in du Plessis, P. J., ed., New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World (Edinburgh, 2013), 73–101.Google Scholar
Hummer, H., Politics and Power in Early Medieval Europe: Alsace and the Frankish Realm, 600–1000 (Cambridge, 2005).Google Scholar
Hummer, H., “The Production and Preservation of Documents in Francia: The Evidence of Cartularies,” in Brown, W. C. et al., eds., Documentary Culture, 189–230.Google Scholar
Innes, M., “Archives, documents and landowners in Carolingian Francia,” in Brown, W. C et al., eds., Documentary Culture, 152–88.Google Scholar
Innes, M., Introduction to Early Medieval Western Europe, 300–900: The Sword, the Plow, and the Book (London, 2007).Google Scholar
Innes, M., “On the Material Culture of Legal Documents: Charters and their Preservation in the Cluny Archive, Ninth to Eleventh Centuries,” in Brown, W. C et al., eds., Documentary Culture, 283–320.Google Scholar
Innes, M., “Practices of Property in the Carolingian Empire,” in Davis, J. R. and McCormick, M., eds., The Long Morning of Medieval Europe: New Directions in Early Medieval Studies (Burlington, VT, 2008), 247–66.Google Scholar
Innes, M., State and Society in the Early Middle Ages: The Middle Rhine Valley, 400–1000 (Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar
Iogna-Prat, D., “Le ‘baptême’ du schema des trois ordres functionnels: l’apport de l’école d’Auxerre,” Annales ESC 41 (1986), 101–26.Google Scholar
Jahn, J., “Virgil, Arbeo und Cozroh: Verfassungsgeschichtliche Beobachtungen an bairischen Quellen des 8. und 9. Jahrhunderts,” Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Salzburger Landeskunde 130 (1990), 201–91.Google Scholar
Johne, K.-P., “Notitia Galliarum,” in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Brill’s New Pauly, vol. 9 (Leiden, 2006), col. 830.Google Scholar
Joye, S., La femme ravie: le mariage par rapt dans les sociétés occidentales du haut Moyen Âge (Turnhout, 2012).Google Scholar
Karras, R. M., “The Christianization of Medieval Marriage,” in Mengel, D. C. and Wolverton, L., eds., Christianity and Culture in the Middle Ages: Essays to Honor John Van Engen (Notre Dame, IN, 2015), 3–24.Google Scholar
Karras, R. M., “The History of Marriage and the Myth of Friedelehe,” Early Medieval Europe 14 (2006), 119–51.Google Scholar
Kasten, B., “Aspekte des Lehnswesens in Einhards Briefen,” in Schefers, H., ed., Einhard, 247–67.Google Scholar
Kasten, B., “Beneficium zwischen Landleihe und Lehen – eine alte Frage, neu gestellt,” in Bauer, D., Hiestand, R., Kasten, B., and Lorenz, S., eds., Mönchtum–Kirche–Herrschaft (Sigmaringen, 1998), 243–60.Google Scholar
Kasten, B., “Economic and Political Aspects of Leases in the Kingdom of the Franks during the Eighth and Ninth Centuries: A Contribution to the Current Debate about Feudalism,” in Bagge, S., Gelting, M. H., and Lindkvist, T., eds., Feudalism: New Landscapes of Debate (Turnhout, 2011), 27–55.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. R., Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Kéry, L., Canonical Collections of the Early Middle Ages (ca. 400–1140): A Bibliographical Guide to the Manuscripts and Literature (Washington, DC, 1999).Google Scholar
Knibbs, E. “The Interpolated Hispana and the Origins of Pseudo-Isidore,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung 99 (2013), 1–71.Google Scholar
Kosto, A. J., “Hostages in the Carolingian World (714–840),” Early Medieval Europe 11 (2002), 123–47.Google Scholar
Kosto, A. J., Hostages in the Early Middle Ages: Communication, Conversion, and Structures of Alliance (Oxford, 2012).Google Scholar
Kosto, A. J., and Winroth, A., eds., Charters, Cartularies, and Archives: The Preservation and Transmission of Documents in the Medieval West (Toronto, 2002).Google Scholar
Koziol, G., “Baldwin VII of Flanders and the Toll of Saint-Vaast (1111): Judgment as Ritual,” in Brown, W. and Górecki, P, eds., Conflict in Medieval Europe, 151–61.Google Scholar
Koziol, G., The Politics of Memory and Identity in Carolingian Royal Diplomas: The West Frankish Kingdom (840–987) (Turnhout, 2012).Google Scholar
Krause, J.-U., “Colonatus,” in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Brill’s New Pauly, vol. 3 (Leiden, 2003), cols. 538–41.Google Scholar
Kroeschell, K., “Söhne und Töchter im germanischen Erbrecht,” in Landwehr, G., ed., Studien zu den germanischen Volksrechten. Gedächtnisschrift für Wilhelm Ebel (Frankfurt am Main, 1982), 87–116.Google Scholar
Ladner, P., “Die Welt Notkers des Dichters im Spiegel seiner Urkunden,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 41 (1985), 24–38.Google Scholar
Laffitte, M.-P., “Les manuscrits de la collection de Thou,” in Jolly, C., ed., Histoire des bibliothèques françaises. Tome 2: les bibliothèques sous l’Ancien Régime 1530–1789 (Paris, 1988), 108–9.Google Scholar
Latham, R. E., Howlett, D. R., and Ashdowne, R. K., eds., Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources (Oxford, 1975–2013).Google Scholar
Lauranson-Rosaz, C., L’Auvergne et ses marges (Velay, Gévaudan) du VIIIe au XIe siècle. La fin du monde antique? (Le Puy-en-Velay, 1987).Google Scholar
Ledgway, A. and Maiden, M., eds., The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages (Oxford, 2016).Google Scholar
“Legal Form Books by Subject, Introduction,” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Kathrine R. Everett Law Library, library guide : guides.lib.unc.edu/formbooks.Google Scholar
Liebs, D., “Selbstverkauf statt Schuldknechtschaft im germanisch-römischen Recht,” in Atti dell’Accademia Romanistica Costantiniana XVIII in onore di Remo Martini (Rome, 2012), 377–95.Google Scholar
Liebs, D., “Sklaverei aus Not im germanisch-römischen Recht,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 118 (2001), 286–311.Google Scholar
Le Jan, R., Famille et pouvoir dans le monde Franc (VIIe–Xe siècle): essai d’anthropologie sociale (Paris, 1995).Google Scholar
Le Jan, R., “Justice royale et pratiques sociales dans le royaume franc au IXe siècle,” in La Giustizia (Secoli IX–XI), 47–90.Google Scholar
Le Jan, R., “Malo ordine tenent. Transferts patrimoniaux et conflits dans le monde franc (VIIe–Xe siècle),” in Les transferts patrimoniaux, 951–72.Google Scholar
Le Jan, R., Les transferts patrimoniaux en Europe occidentale, VIIIe–Xe siècle (I). Actes de la table ronde de Rome, 6, 7 et 8 mai 1999 (Rome, 1999).Google Scholar
Liebs, D., “Roman Vulgar Law in Late Antiquity,” in Sirks, B., ed., Aspects of Law in Late Antiquity: Dedicated to A.M. Honoré on the Occasion of the Sixtieth Year of His Teaching in Oxford (Oxford, 2008), 35–53.Google Scholar
Liebs, D., “Die im spätantiken Gallien verfügbaren römischen Rechtstexte. Literaturschicksale in der Provinz zwischen dem 3. und 9. Jahrhundert,” in Siems, H., Nehlsen-v. Stryk, K., and Strauch, D, eds., Recht im frühmittelalterlichen Gallien. Spätantike Tradition und germanische Wertvorstellungen (Cologne, 1995), 1–28.Google Scholar
Malettke, K., “Pierre Pithou als Historiker,” in Buck, A., ed., Humanismus und Historiographie (Weinheim, 1991), 89–103.Google Scholar
Marilier, J., “Flavigny (S.-Pierre-et-S. Prix),” in Aubert, R., ed., Dictionnaire d’histoire et de géographie ecclésiastiques (Paris, 1971), 400–5.Google Scholar
Marilier, J., “Le scriptorium de l’abbaye de Flavigny au VIIIe siècle,” Annales de Bourgogne, 44 (1983), 30–3.Google Scholar
Martin, C., “Ne inter coniuges diuortium fiat,” in Jégou, L., Joye, S., Lienhard, T. and Schneider, J., eds., Splendor reginae: passions, genre et famille: mélanges en l’honneur de Régine Le Jan (Turnhout, 2015), 93–9.Google Scholar
McHaffie, M. W., “Law and Violence in Eleventh-Century France,” Past and Present 238 (2018), 3–41.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., “Charters, Languages, and Communication: Recent Work on Early Medieval Literacy,” in Gallagher, R. et al., eds., The Languages of Early Medieval Charters, 22–67.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., The Frankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians, 751–987 (London, 1983).Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., “Frauen und Schriftlichkeit im Frühmittelalter,” in Goetz, H.-W., ed., Weibliche Lebensgestaltung, 65–118.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., “Zur Herstellung von Kapitularien. Die Arbeit des Leges-Skriptoriums,” Mitteilungen des Instituts für Österreichische Geschichtsforschung 101 (1993), 3–16.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., “Knowledge of Canon Law in the Frankish Kingdoms before 789: The Manuscript Evidence,” Journal of Theological Studies, N.S., 36 (1985), 97–117.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., “Perceptions of Rome and the Papacy in Late Merovingian Francia: The Cononian Recension of the Liber Pontificalis,” in Esders, S., Fox, Y., Hen, Y. and Sarti, L., eds., East and West in the Early Middle Ages: The Merovingian Kingdoms in Mediterranean Perspective (Cambridge, 2019), 165–186.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., “Some Carolingian Law-books and Their Function,” in Linehan, P. and Tierney, B., eds., Authority and Power: Studies on Medieval Law and Government Presented to Walter Ullman on His Seventieth Birthday (Cambridge, 1980), 13–27.Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. II c. 700–900 (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., The Uses of Literacy in Early Mediaeval Europe (Cambridge, 1990), 319–33.Google Scholar
Mersiowsky, M., “Regierungspraxis und Schriftlichkeit im Karolingerreich: das Fallbeispiel der Mandate und Briefe,” in Schieffer, R., ed., Schriftkultur und Reichsverwaltung unter den Karolingern (Opladen, 1996), 109–66.Google Scholar
Mordek, H., Bibliotheca Capitularium regum Francorum manuscripta. Überlieferung und Traditionszusammenhang der fränkischen Herrschererlasse (Munich, 1995).Google Scholar
Mordek, H., “Herovalliana, Collectio,” in Bautier, R.-H et al., eds., Lexikon des Mittelalters, vol. 4 (Munich, 1989), 2176.Google Scholar
Mordek, H., Kirchenrecht und Reform im Frankenreich: Die Collectio Vetus Gallica: Die älteste systematische Kanonessammlung des Fränkischen Gallien (Berlin, 1975).Google Scholar
Morelle, L., “Les ‘actes de précaire,’ instruments de transferts patimoniaux (France du nord et de l’est, VIIIe–XIe siècle),” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome. Moyen-Age 111 (1999), 607–47.Google Scholar
Morelle, L., “Incertitudes et faux-semblants: quelques remarques sur l’élaboration des actes privés Carolingiens à la lumière de deux gisements de France septentrionale (Sithiu/Saint-Bertin, Saint-Denis),” in Erhart, P. et al., eds., Die Privaturkunden, 103–20.Google Scholar
Mostert, M. and Barnwell, P. S., eds., Medieval Legal Process: Physical, Spoken and Written Performance in the Middle Ages (Turnhout, 2011).Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H., “Manumission,” in du Plessis, P. J. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, 402–15.Google Scholar
Müller-Mertens, E., “The Ottonians as Kings and Emperors,” in Reuter, T., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. III, 233–66.Google Scholar
Murray, A. C., “So-Called Fictitious Trial in the Merovingian Placita,” in Diefenbach, S. and Müller, G. M., eds., Gallien in Spätantike und Frühmittelalter. Kulturgeschichte einer Region (Berlin, 2013), 297–327.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “Dispute Settlement in Carolingian West Francia,” in Davies, W. and Fouracre, P., eds., The Settlement of Disputes, 45–64.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “England and the Continent in the Ninth Century: III, Rights and Rituals,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 14 (2004), 1–24.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “The Frankish Kingdoms, 814–898: The West,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History II, 110–141.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “Kings with Justice, Kings without Justice: an Early Medieval Paradox,” in La Giustizia (Secoli IX–XI), 797–826.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “Kingship and Royal Government,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History II, 383–430.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “Literacy in Carolingian Government,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The Uses of Literacy, 258–96.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “Rulers and Government,” in Reuter, T., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History, Vol. III, 95–129.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “Translating Images of Authority: The Christian Roman Emperors in the Carolingian World,” in The Frankish World, 750–900 (London, 1996), 89–98.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. L., “The Wary Widow,” in Davies, W. and Fouracre, P., eds., Property and Power, 82–113.Google Scholar
Niermeyer, J. F., van de Kieft, C., and Burgers, J. W. J., eds., Mediae Latinitatis Lexicon Minus, 2nd ed., 2 vols. (Leiden, 2002).Google Scholar
Norberg, D., Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete des Spätlateins und des frühen Mittellateins (Uppsala, 1943).Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. “Ancilla”: Beiträge zur Geschichte der unfreien Frauen im Frühmittelalter (Pfaffenweiler, 1996).Google Scholar
Oexle, O. G., “Tria genera hominum: Zur Geschichte eines Deutungsschemas der sozialen Wirklichkeit in Antike und Mittelalter,” in Fenske, L., Rösener, W., and Zotz, T., eds., Institutionen, Gesellschaft und Kultur im Mittelalter: Festschrift für Josef Fleckenstein zu seinem 65. Geburtstag (Sigmaringen, 1984), 483–99.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, online, www.oed.com.Google Scholar
Patt, S., Studien zu den “Formulae imperiales.” Urkundenkonzeption und Formulargebrauch in der Kanzlei Ludwigs des Frommen (814–840) (Wiesbaden, 2016).Google Scholar
Patzold, S., Ich und Karl der Große: Das Leben des Höflings Einhard (Stuttgart, 2013).Google Scholar
Patzold, S., “… inter pagensium nostrorum gladios vivimus. Zu den ‘Spielregeln’ der Konfliktführung in Niederlothringen zur Zeit der Ottonen und frühen Salier,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte 118 (2001), 58–99.Google Scholar
Patzold, S., “Konflikte als Thema in der modernen Mediävistik,” in Goetz, H.-W., ed., Moderne Mediävistik. Stand und Perspektiven der Mittelalterforschung (Darmstadt, 1999), 198–205.Google Scholar
Pithou, P., Le premier livre des memoires des comtes hereditaires de Champagne et Brie (Paris, 1572).Google Scholar
Prinz, F., “Fortissimus abba. Karolingischer Klerus und Krieg,” in Angerer, F. F and Lenzenwenger, J., eds., Consuetudines Monasticae: Eine Festgabe für Kassius Hallinger aus Anlass seines 70. Geburtstages (Rome, 1982), 61–96.Google Scholar
Puza, R., “Laie,” in Bautier, R.-H. et al., eds., Lexikon des Mittelalters, vol. 5 (Munich, 1991), 1616–17.Google Scholar
Reimitz, H., History, Frankish Identity and the Framing of Western Ethnicity, 550–850 (Cambridge, 2015).Google Scholar
Reuter, T., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. III, c. 900–c. 1024 (Cambridge, 1999).Google Scholar
Reynolds, L., “Dotal Charters in the Frankish Tradition,” in Reynolds, L. and Witte, J. Jr., eds., To Have and to Hold: Marrying and Its Documentation in Western Christendom, 400–1600 (Cambridge, 2007), 114–64.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L., Marriage in the Western Church: The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods (Leiden, 1994).Google Scholar
Richter, M., “À quelle époque a-t-on cessé de parler latin en Gaule? À propos d’une question mal posée,” Annales. Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 38 (1983), 439–48.Google Scholar
Rio, A., “Charters, Law Codes and Formulae: The Franks between Theory and Practice,” in Fouracre, P. and Ganz, D., eds., Frankland: The Franks and the World of the Early Middle Ages (Manchester, 2008), 7–27.Google Scholar
Rio, A., “Freedom and Unfreedom in Early Medieval Francia: The Evidence of the Legal Formulae,” Past and Present 193 (2006), 7–40.Google Scholar
Rio, A., “‘Half-Free’ Categories in the Early Middle Ages: Fine Status Distinctions before Professional Lawyers,” in Dresch, P. and Scheele, J., eds., Legalism: Rules and Categories (Oxford, 2015), 129–52.Google Scholar
Rio, A., “High and Low: Ties of Dependence in the Frankish Kingdoms,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 18, Sixth series (2008), 43–68.Google Scholar
Rio, A., Legal Practice and the Written Word in the Early Middle Ages: Frankish Formulae, c. 500–1000 (Cambridge, 2009).Google Scholar
Rio, A., “Penal Enslavement in the Early Middle Ages,” in Lichtenstein, A. and de Vito, C., eds., Global Convict Labor (Leiden, 2015), 79–107.Google Scholar
Rio, A., “Self-Sale and Voluntary Entry into Unfreedom, 300–1100,” Journal of Social History 45 (2012), 661–85.Google Scholar
Rist, J., “Nestorius, Nestorianism,” in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H, eds., Brill’s New Pauly, vol. 9 (Leiden, 2006), cols. 685–7.Google Scholar
Roberts, E., “Boundary Clauses and the Use of the Vernacular in Eastern Frankish Charters, c. 750–c.900,” Historical Research 91 (2018), 580–604.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. and Harding, J., eds, The Oxford Companion to Wine, 4th ed. (Oxford, 2015).Google Scholar
Rosenwein, B. H., To Be the Neighbor of Saint Peter: The Social Meaning of Cluny’s Property, 909–1049 (Ithaca, NY, 1989).Google Scholar
Rosenwein, B. H., “Property Transfers and the Church, Eighth to Eleventh Centuries: An Overview,” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome. Moyen-Age 111 (1999), 563–75.Google Scholar
Rosenwein, B. H. and Cristiani, R., What Is the History of Emotions? (Cambridge, 2018).Google Scholar
Rovelli, A., “From the Fall of Rome to Charlemagne (c. 400–800),” in Naismith, R., ed., Money and Coinage in the Middle Ages (Leiden, 2018), 63–92.Google Scholar
Saltzman, B. A., Bonds of Secrecy: Law, Spirituality, and the Literature of Concealment in Early Medieval England (Philadelphia, 2019).Google Scholar
Sammarthanus, D. and de Sainte-Marthe, D., eds., Gallia Christiana in provincias ecclesiasticas distributa (Paris, 1728; repr. 1886).Google Scholar
Saunders, E. S., “Public Administration and the Library of Jean-Baptiste Colbert,” Libraries and Culture 26 (1991), 283–300.Google Scholar
Schieffer, R., ed., Schriftkultur und Reichsverwaltung unter den Karolingern (Wiesbaden, 1996).Google Scholar
Schmidt-Wiegand, R., “Leges Alamannorum,” in Beck, H., Geuenich, D., and Steuer, H., eds., Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde, vol. 18 (Berlin, 2001), 201–5.Google Scholar
Seiler, A., “Germanic Names, Vernacular Sounds, and Latin Spellings in Early Anglo-Saxon and Alemannic Charters,” in Gallagher, R. et al., eds., The Languages of Early Medieval Charters, 117–53.Google Scholar
Sennis, A., “Documentary Practices, Archives and Laypeople in Central Italy, Mid Ninth to Eleventh Centuries,” in Brown, W. C. et al., eds., Documentary Culture, 321–35.Google Scholar
Siems, H., “Bestechliche und ungerechte Richter in frühmittelalterlichen Rechtsquellen,” in La Giustizia (Secoli V–VIII), 509–67.Google Scholar
Siems, H., “Die Entwicklung von Rechtstexten zwischen Spätantike und Mittelalter,” in Kölzer, T. and Schieffer, R., eds., Von der Spätantike zum frühen Mittelalter. Kontinuitäten und Brüche, Konzeptionen und Befunde (Sigmaringen, 2009), 245–85.Google Scholar
Smith, J. M. H., “Einhard: The Sinner and the Saints,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 13 (2003), 55–77.Google Scholar
Soliva, C., “Römisches Recht in Churrätien,” Jahrbuch der Historisch-antiquarischen Gesellschaft Graubünden 116 (1986), 189–206.Google Scholar
Staab, F, “La circulation des biens à l’intérieur de la famille dans la région du Rhin moyen,” in Les transferts patrimoniaux, 911–31.Google Scholar
Staab, F, Untersuchungen zur Gesellschaft am Mittelrhein in der Karolingerzeit (Wiesbaden, 1975).Google Scholar
Stafford, P., “Parents and Children in the Early Middle Ages,” Early Medieval Europe 10 (2001), 257–71.Google Scholar
Stratmann, M., “Einhards letzte Lebensjahre (830–840) im Spiegel seiner Briefe,” in Schefers, H., ed., Einhard, 323–39.Google Scholar
Stuard, S. M., “Ancillary Evidence for the Decline of Medieval Slavery,” Past and Present 149 (1995), 3–28.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. S., “Social Status, Legal Status and Legal Privilege,” in du Plessis, P. J. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, 349–61.Google Scholar
Tock, B.-M., “Les actes entre particuliers en Bourgogne méridionale (IXe–XIe siècles),” in Erhart, P. et al., eds., Die Privaturkunden, 121–34.Google Scholar
Turner, C. H., “The Liber Ecclesiasticorum Dogmatum attributed to Gennadius,” The Journal of Theological Studies, O.S., 7 (1905), 78–99.Google Scholar
Ubl, K., “Gab es das Leges-Skriptorium Ludwigs des Frommen?,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 70 (2014), 43–65.Google Scholar
Ubl, K., Inzestverbot und Gesetzgebung. Die Konstruktion eines Verbrechens (300–1100) (Berlin, 2008).Google Scholar
Ubl, K., Sinnstiftung eines Rechtsbuchs. Die Lex Salica im Frankenreich (Ostfildern, 2017).Google Scholar
van den Gheyn, J., Catalogue des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque royale de Belgique, vol. 3 (Brussels, 1903).Google Scholar
van Els, A. M. J., “Een leeuw van een handschrift. Ademar van Chabannes en MS Leiden, Universiteitsbibliotheek,Vossianus Latinus Octavo 15” (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, 2015).Google Scholar
van Els, A. M. J., A Man and His Manuscripts: The Notebooks of Ademar of Chabannes (989–1034), trans. Summerfield, T. (Turnhout, 2020).Google Scholar
van Rhijn, C., Leading the Way to Heaven: Pastoral Care and Salvation in the Carolingian Period (London, 2022).Google Scholar
von den Steinen, W., “Notker des Dichters Formelbuch,” Zeitschrift für Schweizer Geschichte 25 (1945), 449–90.Google Scholar
von Scarpatetti, B. M., Die Handschriften der Stiftsbibliothek St. Gallen, vol. 1, pt. IV: Codices 547–669 (Wiesbaden, 2003).Google Scholar
Wemple, S., Women in Frankish Society: Marriage and the Cloister 500–900 (Philadelphia, 1985).Google Scholar
Wermlinger, O., “Pelagius [4],” in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H., eds., Brill’s New Pauly, vol. 10 (Leiden, 2007), cols. 689–91.Google Scholar
West, C., “Lordship in Ninth-Century Francia: The Case of Bishop Hincmar of Laon and His Followers,” Past and Present 226 (2015), 3–40.Google Scholar
West, C., Reframing the Feudal Revolution. Political and Social Transformation between Marne and Moselle, c.800–c.1100 (Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Wickham, C., “Aristocratic Power in Eighth-Century Lombard Italy,” in Murray, A. C., ed., After Rome’s Fall: Narrators and Sources of Early Medieval History (Toronto, 1998), 153–70.Google Scholar
Wickham, C., “Debate: The Feudal Revolution. Comment 4,” Past and Present 155 (1997), 196–208.Google Scholar
Wickham, C., Framing the Early Middle Ages: Europe and the Mediterranean, 400–800 (Oxford, 2005).Google Scholar
Wickham, C., “Rural Society in Carolingian Europe,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The New Cambridge Medieval History II, 510–37.Google Scholar
Wild, J., “Charta und Notitia in Herzogtum Bayern,” in Kölzer, T., Bornschlegel, F., Friedl, C., and Vogele, G., eds., De Litteris, Manuscriptis, Inscriptionibus … Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Walter Koch (Vienna, 2007), 27–37.Google Scholar
Wolfram, H. Salzburg, Bayern, Österreich: Die Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum und die Quellen ihrer Zeit (Vienna, 1995).Google Scholar
Wolfram, H. Intitulatio. I: Lateinische Königs- und Fürstentitel bis zum Ende des 8. Jahrhunderts (Vienna, 1967).Google Scholar
Wood, I., “Administration, Law and Culture in Merovingian Gaul,” in McKitterick, R., ed., The Uses of Literacy, 63–81.Google Scholar
Wood, I., “The Code in Merovingian Gaul,” in Harries, J. and Wood, I., eds., The Theodosian Code, 161–77.Google Scholar
Wood, I., “Disputes in Late Fifth- and Sixth-Century Gaul: Some Problems,” in Davies, W and Fouracre, P., eds., The Settlement of Disputes, 7–22.Google Scholar
Wood, I., “Letters and Letter-Collections from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages: The Prose Works of Avitus of Vienne,” in Meyer, M. A, ed., The Culture of Christendom: Essays in Medieval History in Commemoration of Denis L. T. Bethell (London, 1993), 29–43.Google Scholar
Wood, I., “Teutslind, Witlaic and the history of Merovingian precaria,” in Davies, W. and Fouracre, P., eds., Property and Power, 31–52.Google Scholar
Wormald, P. The Making of English Law: King Alfred to the Twelfth Century. Vol. I. Legislation and Its Limits (Oxford,1999).Google Scholar
Zeller, B., “Nach 887/888: Herrscherbilder und Herrschaftskonzeptionen in der sogenannten Collectio Sangallensis,” in Pohl, W., Diesenberger, M., and Zeller, B., eds., Neue Wege der Frühmittelalterforschung: Bilanz und Perspektiven (Vienna, 2018), 373–82.Google Scholar
Zeller, B., Diplomatische Studien zu den St. Galler Privaturkunden des frühen Mittelalters (ca. 720–980) (Vienna, 2022).Google Scholar
Zeller, B., “Language, Formulae, and Carolingian Reforms: The Case of the Alemannic Charters from St. Gall,” in Gallagher, R. et al., eds., The Languages of Early Medieval Charters, 154–87.Google Scholar
Zeller, B., “The Use (and Non-Use) of the Collectio Sangallensis and Other Early St Gall Formula Collections,” paper delivered at the International Medieval Congress, University of Leeds, July 5, 2016.Google Scholar
Zeller, B., “Writing Charters as a Public Activity: The Example of the Carolingian Charters of St Gall,” in Mostert, M. and Barnwell, P. S., eds., Medieval Legal Process, 27–37.Google Scholar
Zeumer, K., “Ueber den Ersatz verlorener Urkunden im fränkischen Reiche,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung 1 (1880), 89–123.Google Scholar
Zeumer, K., “Ueber die älteren fränkischen Formelsammlungen,” Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde 6 (1880), 9–115.Google Scholar
Zeumer, K., “Die Lindenbruch’sche Handschrift der Formelsammlung von Flavigny,” Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde 14 (1889), 589–603.Google Scholar
Zeumer, K., “Neue Erörterungen über ältere fränkische Formelsammlungen,” Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde 11 (1886), 311–58.Google Scholar