AA.VV. (2005)Google Scholar

EU Environmental Policy Handbook, European Environmental Bureau, 2005.Google Scholar

AA.VV. (2007)Google Scholar

EU Environmental Guide, Amcham EU, 2007.Google Scholar

ADDINK (1983)Google Scholar

Addink, G.H., Het vergunningenstelsel in de Afvalstoffenwet: een voorbeeld van een overcomplexe bevoegdheid, Milieu & Recht, 4, 1983, pp. 97–105.Google Scholar

ADDINK (1991a)Google Scholar

Addink, G.H., Biedt het wetvoorstel afvalstoffen adequate oplossingen voor de belangrijkste knelpunten van het Nederlandse afvalstoffenbeleid?, in Jans, & Van Acht, (eds.), Afvalstoffenrecht, Tjeenk Willink, 1991, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar

ADDINK (1991b)Google Scholar

Addink, G.H., Afvalstoffenwetgeving, in Brussaard, A.O (eds.), Milieu & Recht, 2^de drukt, Tjeenk Willink, 1991, pp. 212–259.Google Scholar

ADDINK (1993)Google Scholar

Addink, G.H., Het normerend karakter van de nieuwe afvalstoffenregelgeving, Milieu & Recht, 12, 1993, pp. 677–687.Google Scholar

ADDINK (1996)Google Scholar

Afvalstoffen, G.H. Addink, in Brussard, e.o., (eds.), Milieurecht, 4^de druk, Tjeenk Willink, 1996, pp. 159–189.Google Scholar

ADDINK (2004a)Google Scholar

Addink, G.H., Afvalstoffenrechtspraak in vogelvlucht, Milieu & Recht, 8, 2004, pp. 470–482.Google Scholar

ADDINK (2004b)Google Scholar

Addink, G.H., Annotatie HvJ EG C-194/01, Milieu & Recht, 7, nr. 63, 2004, pp. 437–446.Google Scholar

ADDINK (2006)Google Scholar

Addink, G.H., Afvalstoffen, in Backes, W., Gilhuis, P.C., Koeman, N.S.J. (eds.), Milieurecht, 6^de druk, Kluwer, 2006, pp. 181–222.Google Scholar

ADINOLFI (2004)Google Scholar

Adinolfi, A., Nuove procedure per l’attuazione delle direttive comunitarie nelle materie di competenza regionale: verso le leggi comunitarie regionali?, Rivista di Diritto Internazionale, 2004, pp. 759 ff.Google Scholar

ADRIAANSE ET AL. (2008)Google Scholar

Adriaanse, P.C, Barkhuysen, T., Den Ouden, W. & Schuurmans, Y.E., Effective Implementation of European Community Law, A Facilitating Role of National General Administrative Law, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 22E, 2008, pp. 5–33.Google Scholar

ALKEMA (2005)Google Scholar

Alkema, E.A., Noot HR 2 november 2004, nr. 00156/04 E, NJ (2005), 80.Google Scholar

AMBLER, CHITTENDEN & OBODOVSKI (2004)Google Scholar

Ambler, T., Chittenden, F. & Obodovski, M., How Much Regulation Is Establishing Gold Plating? A Study of UK Elaboration of EU Directives, (London, British Chambers of Commerce, 2004).Google Scholar

ANDERSON & LIEFFERINK (eds.) (1997)Google Scholar

Anderson, M.S. & Liefferink, D., European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers, Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

ANKER ET AL. (2015)Google Scholar

Anker, H.T., de Graaf, K., Purdy, R. & Squintani, L., Coping with EU Environmental Legislation – Transposition Principles and Practices, Journal of Environmental Law 27 (1) 2015, 17–44.Google Scholar

ARENDSEN (2008)Google Scholar

Arendsen, R., Geen bericht, goed bericht, (dissertation) Vossiuspers UvA, Amsterdam University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

ARENTZ & WOLDENDORP (2005)Google Scholar

Arentz, B. & Woldendorp, H.E., Soortenbescherming Flora-en faunawet: complexiteit naar climax, Milieu & Recht, 2005, pp. 202–211.Google Scholar

ATTHOFF & WALLGREN (2012)Google Scholar

Atthoff, K. & Wallgren, M., Clarifying Gold-Plating – Better Implementation of EU Legislation, Board of Swedish Industry and Commerce for Better Regulation, 2012.Google Scholar

AXELROD & VIG (1998)Google Scholar

Axelrod, R.S. & Vig, N.J., The European Union as an Environmental Governance System, in Vig, & Axelrod, (eds.), The Global Environment. Institutions, Law and Policy, CQ Press, 1998, pp. 72–97.Google Scholar

BÄCKER (2008)Google Scholar

Backer, R.J.G., De Wet Luchtkwaliteit: nieuwe ronde, nieuwe kansen?, Milieu & Recht, nr. 7, 2005, pp. 421–427.Google Scholar

BACKES (1993)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Het wetsvoorstel voor een Flora- en faunawet: integratie or opeenhoping van regelgeving?, in Backes, Ch.W. & Koopmans, A.J.C., Flora- en faunawet, Tjeenk Willing, 1993, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar

BACKES (1995)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W. Implementatie van Habitatrichtlijn in het Nederlandse (natuurbeschermingd) recht, Milieu & Recht, nr. 11, 1995, pp. 216–221.Google Scholar

BACKES (1997)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Afvalverwerking – zeker een Europees(rechtelijk) probleem, in Dresden, e.o., Afval: provinciaal, landelijk of Europees probleem?, Tjeenk Willink, 1997, pp. 44–52.Google Scholar

BACKES (1999)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Introduction, in Backes, Ch. & Betlem, G. (eds.), Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar

BACKES (2000)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Handhaving van de Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijnen, in Koopmans en Verscheuren, Handhaving van Europees milieurecht, Boom juridische uitgevers, 2000, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar

BACKES (2002)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Geen grenzen aan het afvalstoffenbegrip?, in Dresden, & Uylenburg, (eds.), Afvalstoffen: Actuele thema’s rond afval en stoffen, Kluwer, 2002, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar

BACKES (2005a)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Samenhang in het Europees milieurecht? – De relatie tussen de Richtlijn milieuaansprakelijkheid, de Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijn en de Kaderrichtlijn Water, Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht, vol. 5, 2005, pp. 167–170.Google Scholar

BACKES (2005b)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Transformatie van Richtlijn 1999/30/EG in het recht van enkele EG-landen en –regio’s en toepassing van de grenswaarden voor NO2 en PM10 in de praktijk, Centrum voor Omgevingsrecht en Beleid/ NILOS, Universiteit Utrecht, 2005.Google Scholar

BACKES (2006a)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Natuurbeschermingsrecht, Hoofdstuk 15, in Backes, ChW., Gilhuis, P.C. & Koeman, N.S.J., (eds.), Milieurecht, 6th edition, Kluwer, 2006, pp. 482–510.Google Scholar

BACKES (2006b)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Het dossier luchtkwaliteit: anders verder!, Tijdschrift Bouwrecht, nr. 2, 2006, pp. 88 ff.Google Scholar

BACKES (2006c)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Internationale vergelijking implementatie EU-richtlijnen luchtkwaliteit, Centrum voor Omgevingsrecht en Beleid/NILOS, Universiteit Utrecht, 2006.Google Scholar

BACKES ET AL. (2002)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Bastmeijer, C.J., A.A., van Gestel, R.A.J. & Verschuuren, J.M., Codificatie van milieurechtelijke beginselen in de Wet milieubeheer, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2002.Google Scholar

BACKES & KOOPMANS (1993)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W. & Koopmans, A.J.C., Discussie, in Backes, & Koopmans, , Flora- en faunawet, Tjeenk Willing, 1993, pp. 35–47.Google Scholar

BACKES & VAN NIEUWERBURGH (2005)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W. & van Nieuwerburg, T., Transformatie van Richtlijn 1999/30/EG in het recht van enkele EG-landen en –regio’s en toepassing van de grenswaarden voor NO₂ en PM₁₀ in de praktijk / The transposition of Directive 1999/30/EG in the national law of several EC countries and regions and application of the limit values for NO₂ and PM₁₀ in practice, Centrum voor Omgevingsrecht en Beleid/NILOS, Universiteit Utrecht, 2005.Google Scholar

BACKES, FRERIKS & ROBBE (2009)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Freriks, A.A. & Robbe, J., Hoofdlijnen natuurbeschermingsrecht, Sdu Uitgevers, 2009.Google Scholar

BACKES, GILHUIS & KOEMAN (2006)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Gilhuis, P.C. & Koeman, N.S.J. (eds.), Milieurecht, Kluwer, 2006.Google Scholar

BACKES & VAN DEN BROEK (2005)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W. & van den Broek, J.H.G., Gebiedsbescherming eindelijk geboden, Milieu & Recht, nr. 8, 2005 pp. 474–481.Google Scholar

BACKES, VAN NIEUWERBURG & KOELEMEIJER (2005)Google Scholar

Backes, C.W., Van Nieuwerburg, T., Koelemeijer, R.B.A., Transformation of the First Daughter Directive on Air Quality in Several EU Member States and Its Application in Practice, European Environmental Law Review 14 2005, pp. 157–164.Google Scholar

BACKES, PONTEN & NEUMAN (2000)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Ponten, J.A.W.M., & Neumann, F., Gemeenten en de Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijn, VMR 2000–2004.Google Scholar

BACKES, POORTINGA & WOLDENDORP (2010)Google Scholar

Backes, Ch.W., Poortinga, M.A. & Woldendorp, H.E., ‘Natuurbescherming in de natuurwet: Kop eraf?’, in: Natuur(lijk) met recht beschermd: Naar een effectieve en hanteerbare natuurbescherming, Vereniging voor milieurecht 2010–2012, pp.19–57.Google Scholar

BAKKER & VAN WIJMEN (1988)Google Scholar

Bakker, E.H. & van Wijmen, P.C.E., De natuursbeschermingswet, Vereniging voor milieurecht 1988, nr. 4, 1989.Google Scholar

BALDOCK (1987),Google Scholar

Baldock, D., The Organisation of Nature Conservation in Selected EC Countries, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London, 1987.Google Scholar

BARENTS (1999)Google Scholar

Barents, R., Harmonisatie binnen het Europese materiële recht, RegelMaat, 1999 pp. 66–72.Google Scholar

BARNARD (2007)Google Scholar

Barnard, C., The Substantive Law of the EU, the Four Freedoms, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

BASTEIN ET AL. (2013)Google Scholar

Bastein, T. et al., Kansen voor de circulaire economie in Nederland, TNO-rapport, 11 juni 2013, TNO 2013 R10864.Google Scholar

BASTMEIJER (2009)Google Scholar

Bastmeijer, C.J., Natuurbeschermingsrecht in crisistijd: ‘opzij, opzij, opzij … maak plaats, maak plats, maak plats … wij hebben ongelofelijke haast’, Milieu & Recht, afl. 10, 2009, pp. 628–633.Google Scholar

BASTMEIJER & DE VRIES (2005)Google Scholar

Bastmeijer, C.J. & de Vries, J., Implementatie van de EG milieuaansprakelijkheidsrichtlijn in Nederland, Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht, vol. 4, 2005, pp. 135–140.Google Scholar

BASTMEIJER & WILLEMS (2010),Google Scholar

Bastmeijer, C.J. & Willems, K., ‘Robuust, verboden en… beschermd’. Past een klimaatbestendig natuurbeleid met aandacht voor ‘wilde natuur’-beleving in het juridische Natura 2000-jasje?, in Backes, Ch.W., Natuur(lijk) met recht beschermd: Naar een effectieve en hanteerbare natuurbescherming, Vereniging voor Milieurecht Bju 2010–2012, pp. 85–116.Google Scholar

BATES (1996)Google Scholar

Bates, T.St.J.N., United Kingdom Implementation of EU Directives, Statute Law Review 17(1) 1996, pp. 27–49.Google Scholar

BAUW (1991)Google Scholar

Verslag van de, R. Bauw forumdiscussie tijdens de ochtendzitting, in Jans, & Van Acht, (eds.), Afvalstoffenrecht, Tjeenk Willink, 1991, pp. 43–46.Google Scholar

BAUW (2004)Google Scholar

Richtlijn, E. Bauw 2004/35/EG: vernieuwend, maar ook uitvoerbaar?, Nederlandse Tijdschrift voor Europees Recht, nr. 12, 2004, pp. 344–347.Google Scholar

BEIJEN (2007)Google Scholar

Beijen, B.A., Ploeteren met de Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijn, in A. Blomberg & T. de Gier (eds.), Van Utrecht via Brussel naar Maastricht, Kluwer, 2007, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

BEIJEN (2010)Google Scholar

Beijen, B.A., De kwaliteit van milieurichltijnen, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2010.Google Scholar

BEKKERS ET AL. (1995)Google Scholar

Bekkers, V., Bonnes, J., De Moor-van Vugt, A., Schoneveld, P. & Voermans, W., The Case of the Netherlands, in Pappas, S.A. (ed.), National Administrative Procedures for the Preparation and Implementation of Community Decisions, European Institute of Public Administration, 1995, pp. 573–636.Google Scholar

BELLIS (2003)Google Scholar

Bellis, R., Implementation of EU Legislation: An Independent Study for the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, London, Foreign & Commonwealth Office, 2003.Google Scholar

BELOW (2009)Google Scholar

Below, N., elni forum 2009, The EU Directive on Industrial Emission and Its Implementation in National Key Issues and Practical Experiences 14th May 2009 in Brussels, Belgium, Environmental Law Network International Review, (2) (2009), pp. 93–94.Google Scholar

BERGKAMP (2002)Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L., The Proposed Environmental Liability Directive, European Environmental Law Review, 11, 2002, pp. 327–341.Google Scholar

BERGKAMP (2005a)Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L., Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive in EU Member States, in ERA, 2005, pp. 389–400.Google Scholar

BERGKAMP (2005b)Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L., The European Environmental Liability Directive and Its Effects on Industry and the Economy, in Mellenberg, R. & Uylenburg, R (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid voor schade aan de natuur, Europa Law Publishing, 2005, pp. 95– 132.Google Scholar

BERGKAMP (2006)Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L., The Proposed Waste Framework Directive and Liability for Soil and Groundwater Contamination, Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht, 3, 2006, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar

BERNARD (1996)Google Scholar

Bernard, N., The Future of European Economic Law in the Light of the Principle of Subsidiarity, Common Market Law Review, 33, 1996, pp. 633–666.Google Scholar

BERR (1995)Google Scholar

Berr, C.J., Chronique de jurisprudence du Tribunal et de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes. Libre circulation des marchandises, Journal du droit international, No. 2, 1995, pp. 460–461.Google Scholar

BESSELINK, ET AL. (2002)Google Scholar

Besselink, I.F.M., Kummeling, H.R.B.M., de Lange, R., Mendelts, P. & Prechal, S., De Nederlandse Grondwet en de Europese Unie, Europa Law Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar

BETLEM (2005)Google Scholar

Betlem, G., De rol en betekenis van ‘exploitant-aansprakelijkheid’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht, 5, 2005, pp. 171–176.Google Scholar

BIEZEVELD (1993)Google Scholar

Biezeveld, G.A., De Wet milieubeheer: een impuls voor handhaving, Milieu & Recht nr. 2, 1993, pp. 110–117.Google Scholar

BIJKERK (1997)Google Scholar

Bijkerk, Y.G.C.M., Is afval een provincial problem?, in Dresden, e.o., Afval: provinciaal, landelijk of Europees probleem?, Tjeenk Willink, 1997, pp. 13–43.Google Scholar

BINSBERGEN (1994)Google Scholar

Binsbergen, A., Vogelwet 1936 herzien, Het Vogeljaar, nr. 4, 1994, pp. 164–165.Google Scholar

BINSBERGEN (1996)Google Scholar

Binsbergen, A., Vogelwet en Vogelrichtlijn, Het Vogeljaar, nr. 6, 1996, pp. 277–278.Google Scholar

BLEEKER (2009)Google Scholar

Bleeker, A., Does the Polluter Pay?, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 18, 2009, pp. 289–306.Google Scholar

BOCKEN (2006)Google Scholar

Bocken, H., Financial Guarantees in the Environmental Liability Directive: Next Time Better, European Environmental Law Review, 15, 2006, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar

BOEVE & Van den Broek (2012),Google Scholar

Boeve, M.N. & van den Broek, G.M., The Programmatic Approach; a Flexible and Complex Tool to Achieve Environmental Quality Standards, Utrecht Law Review, 8(3) 2012, pp. 74–85.Google Scholar

BOEVE, GROOTHUIJSE & VAN ’T LAM (2009)Google Scholar

Boeve, M.N., Groothuijse, F.A.G. & van ’t Lam, V.M.Y., Omgevingsrecht, Europa Law Publishing, 2009.Google Scholar

BOEVE, PEETERS & POORTINGA (2010)Google Scholar

Boeve, M.N. Peeters, M. & Poortinga, M., Een nieuwe regeling voor de ambtshalve wijziging van de milieuvergunning in her licht van her richtlijnvoorstel industriële emissies, Milieu & Recht, nr. 2, 2010, pp. 77–84.Google Scholar

BOGOJEVIC (2016)Google Scholar

Bogojevic, S., Judicial Protection of Individual Applicants Revisited: Access to Justice through the Prism of Judicial Subsidiarity, in Yearbook of European Law, 34, 2015, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar

BOGOJEVIC (2016)Google Scholar

Bogojevic, S., Climate Change Law and Policy in the European Union, in Carlarne, Cinnamon P., Gray, K. R., & Tarasofsky, R., The Oxford Handbook of International Climate Change Law, Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 670–687.Google Scholar

BOHNE & DIETZE (2004)Google Scholar

Bohne, E. & E. Dietze, Pollution Prevention and Control in Europe Revisited, European Environmental Law Review, 7, 2004, pp. 198–217.Google Scholar

BOHNE (2006)Google Scholar

Bohne, E., The Quest for Environmental Regulatory Integration in the European Union. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Environmental Impact Assessment and Major Accident Prevention, Kluwer Law International, 2006.Google Scholar

BOHNE (2008)Google Scholar

Bohne, E., The implementation of the IPPC Directive from a Comparative Perspective and Lessons for Its Recast (Part I), Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, vol. 5 (1), 2008, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

BOHNE (2008-bis)Google Scholar

Bohne, E., The Implementation of the IPPC Directive from a Comparative Perspective and Lessons for Its Recast (Part II), Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 5(3–4), 2008, pp. 319–338.Google Scholar

BOK (1992)Google Scholar

Bok, A.J., Rechtsbescherming in Franrijk en Duitsland 2nd edition, Wolters Kluwer, 1992.Google Scholar

BONGAERTS (1993)Google Scholar

Bongaerts, J.C., The Packaging Ordinance in Germany and Its Implementation First Experiences, in Wiggers-Rust, e.o. (eds.), Waste Prevention in the EEC, Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 81–92.Google Scholar

BOON, BROUWER & SCHILDER (2005)Google Scholar

Brouwer, B., S. Regelgeving in Nederland, Kluwer, 2005.Google Scholar

BORGERS (2005)Google Scholar

Borgers, H.C., Het Besluit luchtkwaliteit; de recente jurisprudentie in vogelvlucht, Milieu & Recht, nr. 6, 2005, pp. 342–350.Google Scholar

BORGERS (2007)Google Scholar

Borgers, H.C., De beste beschikbare technieken voor het bepalen van de beste beschikbare technieken, in Teesing, N. (ed.), Nederlandse milieurichtlijnen en beste beschikbare technieken, Verslag van de 95ª ledenvergadering van de Vereniging voor Milieurecht op 28 maart 2007, Boom Juridisch Uitgevers, 2007, pp. 27–45.Google Scholar

BÖRZEL (2002)Google Scholar

Börzel, T., Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to Europeanization, in Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 2002, pp. 193–214.Google Scholar

BOSMA (2009),Google Scholar

Bosma, W.J., De wet ‘Wijziging van de Wet milieubeheer (implementatie en derogatie luchtkwaliteitseisen)’, Tijdschrift Bouwrecht, nr. 8, 2009, pp. 641 ff.Google Scholar

BOWMAN, DAVIES & REDGWELL (2010)Google Scholar

Bowman, M., Davies, P. & Redgwell, C., Lyster’s International Wildlife Law, 2nd edition, Cambridge, 2010.Google Scholar

BRANS (2001)Google Scholar

Brans, E.H.P., Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources, Ph.D. Thesis, 2001.Google Scholar

BRANS (2003)Google Scholar

Brans, E.H.P., EC Proposal for an Environmental Liability Directive: Standing and Assessment of Damages, in Griffin’s View on International and Comparative Law, 4(1), 2003, pp. 67–87.Google Scholar

BRANS (2004)Google Scholar

Brans, E.H.P., Richtlijn 2004/35/EG betreffende milieuaansprakelijkheid met betrekking tot het voorkomen en herstellen van milieuschade, in TMA 2004, num. 4, pp. 149–150.Google Scholar

BRANS (2005a)Google Scholar

Brans, E.H.P., De EU Richtlijn Milieuaansprakelijkheid, in Mellenberg, R. & Uylenburg, R. (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid voor schade aan de natuur, Europa Law Publishing, 2005, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar

BRANS (2005b)Google Scholar

Brans, E.H.P., De EU-Richtlijn Milieuaansoprakelijkheid, in Bouwrecht, 2005/1, pp. 14–28.Google Scholar

BRINKHORST (1992)Google Scholar

Brinkhorst, L.J., Subsidiariteit en Milieu in de Europees Gemeenschap. Doos van Pandora of Panacee, Rijks Universiteit Leiden, 1992.Google Scholar

BROEKMEYER ET AL. (2010)Google Scholar

Broekmeyer, M.E.A., Heitkönig, I.M.A., Ninaber, A.E.M. & van Veen, M., Natuurbescherming in Nederland: een ecologische benadering, in: Natuur(lijk) met recht beschermd: Naar een effectieve en hanteerbare natuurbescherming, Vereniging voor milieurecht, 2010–12, pp. 61–84.Google Scholar

BRÖRING (1993)Google Scholar

Bröring, H.E., Richtlijnen, Kluwer, 1993.Google Scholar

BRÖRING (2007)Google Scholar

Bröring, H.E., Richtlijnen, beleidsregels, BREFs: mooi, mooier, mooist?, in Teesing, N. (ed.), Nederlandse milieurichtlijnen en beste beschikbare technieken, Verslag van de 95ª ledenvergadering van de Vereniging voor Milieurecht op 28 maart 2007, Boom Juridisch Uitgevers, 2007, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar

BRUS (2003)Google Scholar

Brus, M., Case C-510/99, Procureur de la République v. Vavier Tridon, Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 October 2001, in Common Market Law Review, 40, 2003, pp. 169–178.Google Scholar

BRUSSARD (1991)Google Scholar

Brussard, W., Natuurbeschermingsrecht, Hoofdstuk 3in Brussard W., Drupsteen, Th.G., Gilhuis, P.C. & Koeman, N.S.J. (eds.), Milieurecht, 2nd edition, Tjeenk Willink, 1991, pp. 338–386.Google Scholar

BRUSSARD (1996)Google Scholar

Brussard, W., Natuurbeschermingsrecht, Hoofdstuk 15 in Brussard W., Drupsteen, Th.G., Gilhuis, P.C. & Koeman, N.S.J. (eds.), Milieurecht, 4th edition, Tjeenk Wilink, 1996, pp. 409–442.Google Scholar

BURMEISTER & STAEBE (2009)Google Scholar

Burmeister, F. & Staebe, E., Grenzen des sog. Gold Plating bei der Umsetzung europäischer Richtlijnien in nationales Recht, in Europarecht, 2009, pp. 444–457.Google Scholar

CALLIESS (1997)Google Scholar

Calliess, C., Towards a European Environmental Constitutional Law, in European Environmental Law Review, 1997, vol. 6, pp. 113–120.Google Scholar

CANNIZARO (2005)Google Scholar

Cannizaro, E., La riforma della Legge La Pergola e la competenza di Stato e Regioni nei processi di formazione ed attuazione di norme dell’Unione Europea, in Rivista di Diritto Internazionale, 2005, pp. 153 ff.Google Scholar

CANNIZARO (2012)Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, E., the Neo-Monism of the European Legal Order, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchieri, P. & Wessel, R.A., International Law as Law of the European Union, Martinus Nijhof Publishers, 2012, pp. 35–58.Google Scholar

CASOLARI (2012)Google Scholar

Casolari, F., Giving Indirect Effect to International Law within the EU Legal Order: The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchieri, P. & Wessel, R.A., International Law as Law of the European Union, Martinus Nijhof Publishers, 2012, pp. 395–415.Google Scholar

CASTELIJN ET AL. (1998)Google Scholar

Castelijn, A., de Jong, P.O., de Ridder, J., Schilstra, A.J. & Lambers, C., Meer dan de som der delen?: Een onderzoek naar de aard van de afwegingen bij de opstelling van milieuvergunningen, ECW-achtergrondstudie nr. 34, Den Haag 1998.Google Scholar

CEA (2008)Google Scholar

CEA, The Environmental Liability Directive, Enhancing Sustainable Insurance Solutions, CEA, 2008.Google Scholar

CHALMERS (1995)Google Scholar

Chalmers, D., Community Policy on Waste Management – Managing Environmental Decline Gently, in Barav, A. & Wyatt, D.A., Yearbook of European Law, 1994, vol. 14, Clarendon Press, 1995, pp. 257–312.Google Scholar

CLOSE (1978)Google Scholar

Close, G., Harmonisation of Laws: Use or Abuse of the Powers under the EEC Treaty, in European Law Review, 1978, pp. 461–481.Google Scholar

CONTALDI (2005)Google Scholar

Contaldi, G., La disciplina della partecipazione Italiana ai processi normative europei alla luce della riforma della legge La Pergola, in Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea, 2005, pp. 515 ff.Google Scholar

CORONER (2006)Google Scholar

Coroner, F., Environmental Liability Directive: How Well Are Member States Handling Transposition?, in Environmental Liability, 2006, pp. 226–229.Google Scholar

CROWHURST (2006)Google Scholar

Crowhurst, G., The Environmental Liability Directive: A UK Perspective, in European Environmental Law Review, 2006, vol. 15, pp. 266–276.Google Scholar

D’OLIVEIRA (1988)Google Scholar

d’ Oliveira, U.J., Single European Act (SEA) and Environmental Policy – Some Questions, in Schwarze, J. & Schermers, H.G. (eds.), Structure and Dimension of European Community Policy – Structure et dimensions des politiques communautaires. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988, pp. 123–125.Google Scholar

DAMEN ET AL. (2009)Google Scholar

Damen, L.J.A. et al., Bestuursrecht, Deel 1, Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2009.Google Scholar

DANIELE (2007)Google Scholar

Daniele, L., Diritto dell’Unione Europea, Giuffré, seconda edizione, 2007.Google Scholar

DAVIDSON (2006)Google Scholar

Davidson, N., Davidson Review: Implementation of EU Legislation (London, Better Regulation Executive, 2006)Google Scholar

DAVIES (2004)Google Scholar

Davis, P.G.G., European Union Environmental Law: An Introduction to Key Selected Issues, Ashgate Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

DASHWOOD (2004)Google Scholar

Dashwood, A., The Relationship between the Member States and the European Union/European Community, in Common Market Law Review 2004, 41, pp. 355–381.Google Scholar

DE BRUYCKER & MORRENS (1993),Google Scholar

De Bruycker, P. & Morrens, P., The concept of waste in EEC, in Wiggers-Rust, e.o. (eds.), Waste Prevention in the EEC, Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

DE BÚRCA (1994)Google Scholar

de Búrca, G., The Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law, in Yearbook of European Law, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 105–150.Google Scholar

DE BÚRCA (1998)Google Scholar

de Búrca, G., The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Court of Justice as an Institutional Actor, in Journal of Common Market Studies, 1998, vol. 36, pp. 217–235.Google Scholar

DE BÚRCA (2000)Google Scholar

de Búrca, G., Proportionality and Subsidiarity as General Principles of Law, in Bernitz, U. & Nergelius, J. (eds.), General Principles of European Community Law, Kluwer Law International, 2000, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar

DE CECCO (2006)Google Scholar

De Cecco, F., Room to Move? Minimum Harmonisation and Fundamental Rights, in Common Market Law Review, 43, 2006, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar

DE GIER & ROBBE (2007)Google Scholar

de Gier, T., & Robbe, J., Integratie of Segregatie?, in Blomberg, A. & de Gier, T. (eds.), Van Utrecht via Brussel naar Maastricht, Kluwer, 2007, pp. 101–119.Google Scholar

DE GROOT & PRINCEN (2004)Google Scholar

de Groot, T.C. & Princen, S.B.M., Weg van Europa? Het Nederlandse openbaar bestuur in de Europese Unie, in Bestuurskunde, 2004, nr. 6, pp. 250 ff.Google Scholar

DE HOOP (2004)Google Scholar

de Hoop, M., Luchtkwaliteit en wegaanpassingen in het kader van de Spoedwet wegverbreiding, in Ramnewash-Oemrawsigh, S.T. (ed.), Regeling inzake luchtkwaliteit; Nederland op slot?, Vereniging voor Milieurecht, BJu, 2006, nr. 1, pp. 61–66.Google Scholar

DE LEEUW & RUYSSENAARS (2011)Google Scholar

de leeuw, F. & Ruyssenaars, P., Evaluation of Current Limit and Target Values as Set in the EU Air Quality Directive, ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2011/3, available at: http://acm.eionet.europa.eu/ (last accessed April 2012).Google Scholar

DE ROOIJ (2004)Google Scholar

de Rooij, R.A.A., ‘Den Haag’ onder druk? Over de relatie tussen de EU, gemeenten en provincies, in Bestuurskunde, 2004, nr. 6, pp. 279 ff.Google Scholar

DE SADELEER (2003)Google Scholar

De Sadeleer, N., Procedures for Derogations from the Principle of Approximation of Laws under Article 95 EC, in Common Market Law Review, 40, 2003, pp. 889.Google Scholar

DE SADELEER (2005)Google Scholar

De Sadeleer, N., Habitat Conservation in EC Law – from Nature Sanctuaries to Ecological Networks, Yearbook of European Environmental Law, 5, Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 215–252.Google Scholar

DE SAVORNIN LOHMAN (2007)Google Scholar

De Savornin Lohman, A.F., De afweging tussen economie en natuurbescherming in jurisprudentie en beleid’, Milieu & Recht 2007, p. 2–6.Google Scholar

DE SMEDT (2008)Google Scholar

De Smedt, K., Environmental Liability in a Federal System: A Law and Economics Analysis, in European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 2008, vol. 17, pp. 106–117.Google Scholar

DE SMEDT (2009)Google Scholar

De Smedt, K., Is Harmonisation Always Effective? The Implementation of the Environmental Liability Directive, in European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 18, 2009, pp. 2–18.Google Scholar

DE VILLEMEUVE (1993)Google Scholar

de Villeneuve, C.H.V., Legal Aspects of Prevention by Technologies, Products and Management, in Wiggers-Rust, e.o. (eds.), Waste Prevention in the EEC, Tjeenk Willink Zwolle, 1993, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar

DE VRIES (2005)Google Scholar

de Vries, J.S., De totstandkoming van de Richtlijn Milieuaansprakelijkheid, in Mellenberg, R. & Uylenburg, R. (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid voor schade aan de natuur, Europa Law Publishing, 2005, pp. 23–30.Google Scholar

DE WITTE (2012)Google Scholar

De Witte, B., Using International Law for the European Union’s Domestic Affairs, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchieri, P. & Wessel, R.A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union, Martinus Nijhof Publishers, 2012, pp. 133–156.Google Scholar

DENYS (1999)Google Scholar

Denys, C., Case C-203/96: Chemische Afvalstoffen Dusseldorp v. Minister van Vlkshuisvestiging, Ruimtelijk Ordening en Milieubeheer, 25 June 1998 (not yet published), Case Report, in European Environmental Law Review, 1999, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar

DESCAMPS (2005)Google Scholar

Descamps, H., Liability for Environmental Damage in Belgium (Flemish Region) in 2005, ERA Forum, 6(3), 2005, pp. 401–414.Google Scholar

DIJKSEN (1994)Google Scholar

Dijkens, A.J., Natuurbescherming op Texel, in Het Vogeljaar, 1994, nr. 1, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

DIJKMANS, DE JONGE & POST (2011)Google Scholar

Dijkman, B.J., de Jonge, M. & Post, A., Koppen in de E&G Wet – Eindrapport, Verslag van het onderzoek naar de nationale kop in de Elektriciteits- en Gaswetgeving ten opzichte van Europese richtlijnen en de afwijkingen in de Electriciteitswet 1998 en in de Gaswet ten opzichte van nationale generieke wetten.Google Scholar

DIMITRAKOPOULOS (2001)Google Scholar

Dimitrakopoulos, D.G., The Transposition of EU Law: ‘Post-Decisional Politics’ and Institutional Autonomy, in European Law Journal, 7(4), 2001, pp. 442–458.Google Scholar

DIMITRAKOPOULOS (2001)Google Scholar

Dimitrakopoulos, D.G., Unintended Consequences: Institutional Autonomy and Executive Discretion in the European Union, Jnl Publ. Pol, 2001, 21/2, pp. 107–131.Google Scholar

D’OLIVEIRA (1988)Google Scholar

d’Oliveira, U.J., Single European Act (SEA) and Environmental Policy – Some Questions, in Schwarze, J. & Schermers, H.G. (eds.), Structure and Dimension of European Community Policy – Structure et dimensions des politiques communautaires, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988, pp. 123–125.Google Scholar

DONELAND (1997)Google Scholar

Doneland, E., The Role of the Office of the Parliamentary Draftsman in the Implementation of European Union Directives in Ireland, in Statute Law Review, 18(1), 1997, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

DOPPELHAMMER (2000)Google Scholar

Doppelhammer, M., More Difficult than Finding The Way Round Chinatown? The IPPC Directive and Its Implementation, in European Environmental Law Review, 2000, vol. 9, pp. 199–206.Google Scholar

DOUGAN (2000)Google Scholar

Dougan, M., Minimum Harmonisation and the Internal Market, in Common Market Law Review, 2000, vol. 37, pp. 853–885.Google Scholar

DRESDEN (1997)Google Scholar

Dresden, M.J., Afval: een nationaal probleem?, in Dresden, e.o. (eds.), Afval: provinciaal, landelijk of Europees probleem?, Tjeenk Willink, 1997, pp. 2–12.Google Scholar

DRESDEN (2005)Google Scholar

Dresden, M.J., Afvalstoffen in een nieuwe jas, in Milieu & Recht, 2005, pp. 2–8.Google Scholar

DREWRY (1995)Google Scholar

Drewey, G., The Case of the United Kingdom, in Pappas, S.A. (ed.) National Administrative Procedures for the Preparation and Implementation of Community Decisions, European Institute of Public Administration, 1995, pp. 468 ff.Google Scholar

DRUPSTEEN (1999)Google Scholar

Drupsteen, Th. G., Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control: The Dutch Experience, in Backes, Ch. & Betlem, G. (eds.), Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 81–90.Google Scholar

DURVILLE (2003)Google Scholar

Duville, A.J., De hete soep van de FFW, in Milieu & Recht 2003/6, pp. 176–178.Google Scholar

DWARKING (1977)Google Scholar

Dwarkin, R.M., Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

EISBOUTS, JANS, & VOGELAAR (2006)Google Scholar

Eisbouts, W.T., Jans, J.H. & Vogelaar, F.O.W., Europees Recht; Algemeen Deel, Europa Law Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar

EISBOUTS ET AL. (2010)Google Scholar

Eisbouts, W.T., Jans, J.H., Senden, L.A.J. & Prechal, A. (eds.), Europees Recht; Algemeen Deel, Europa Law Publishing, (Groningen 2010).Google Scholar

EKINS & MACLEOD (2009)Google Scholar

Ekins, P. & MacLeod, M., Conclusions and Recommendations, in MacLeod, et al. (eds.), Understanding the Costs of Environmental Regulation in Europe, Edward Elgar 2009, pp. 230–246.Google Scholar

EKINS & VENN (2009)Google Scholar

Ekins, P. & Venn, A., Assessing Innovation Dynamics Induced by Environmental Policy, in MacLeod, et al. (eds.), Understanding the Costs of Environmental Regulation in Europe, Edward Elgar 2009, pp. 193–229.Google Scholar

EMILIOU (1996)Google Scholar

Emiliou, N., The Principle of Proportionality in European Law, Kluwer Law International, 1996.Google Scholar

EMMOTT (1999)Google Scholar

Emmott, N., An Overview of the IPPC Directive and Its Development, in Backes Ch. & Betlem G. (eds.), Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 23–41.Google Scholar

EMMOTT & HAIGH (1996)Google Scholar

Emmott, N. & Haigh, N., Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control: UK and EC Approaches and Possible Next Steps, in Journal of Environmental Law, 8(2), 1996, pp. 301–311.Google Scholar

ENCHELMAIER (2013)Google Scholar

S. Enchelmaier, Alpine Transport Restrictions Reconsidered: Commission v. Austria, in Common Market Law Review, 50(1), 2013, pp. 183–202.Google Scholar

ENDRES (2011)Google Scholar

Endres, A., Environmental Economics, Theory and Policy, Revisited and extended English edition, Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

EPINEY (2005)Google Scholar

Epiney, A., Omweltrecht in der Europäischen Union, 2nd edition, Nomos, 2005.Google Scholar

EPINEY (2006)Google Scholar

Epiney, A., European Principles, in Macroy (ed.), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2006, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar

ERASMUS (1993)Google Scholar

Erasmus, H., Priority Waste Streams, in Wiggers-Rust e.o. (eds.), Waste Prevention in the EEC, Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 77–80.Google Scholar

ERMACORA (1998)Google Scholar

Ermacora, F., Community Legislation and Jurisprudence in the Area of Waste Management: Recent Developments, in Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 3(3), 1998, pp. 274282.Google Scholar

EZROJ (2009)Google Scholar

Ezroj, A., Extended Producer Responsibility Programmes in the European Union: In Search of the Optimal Legal Basis, in Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 2009, vol. 20, pp.199–223.Google Scholar

FABBRINI & DONÁ (2003)Google Scholar

Fabbrini, S. & Doná, A., Europeanisation as Strengthening of Domestic Executive Power? The Italian Experience and the case of the ‘Legge Comunitaria’, in Journal of European Integration, 25, pp. 31 ff.Google Scholar

FARMER, TEN BRINK & KETTUNEN (2006),Google Scholar

Farmer, A., Ten Brink, P. & Kettunen, M., Taking Advantage of Flexibility in Implementing EU Environmental Law, in Journal for Environmental & Planning Law, 2006, 3(5), pp. 395–405.Google Scholar

FAURE (1998)Google Scholar

Faure, M.G., Harmonisation of Environmental Law and Market Integration: Harmonising for the Wrong Reasons?, in European Environmental Law Review, 7, 1998, pp. 169–175.Google Scholar

FAURE (2000)Google Scholar

Faure, M.G., Defining Harmonization, Codification and Integration, in European Environmental Law Review, 9 2000, p. 174–182.Google Scholar

FAURE (2005)Google Scholar

Faure, M.G., De Europese Richtlijn Milieuaansprakelijkheid: Kritische inleidende bedenkingen, in Mellenberg, R. & Uylenburg, R. (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid voor schade aan de natuur, Europa Law Publishing, 2005, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

FAURE AND DE SMEDT (2013)Google Scholar

Faure, M.G. & De Smedt, K., The ELD’s Effects in Practice, in Bergkamp, L. and Goldsmith, B. (eds.) The EU Environmental Liability Directive a Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 299–314.Google Scholar

FAURE & LEFEVERE (1996)Google Scholar

Faure, M.G. & Lefevere, J.G.J., The Draft Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control: An Economic Perspective, in European Environmental Law Review, 1996, pp. 112–122.Google Scholar

FIETEN & DRAHMANN (2010)Google Scholar

Fieten, R.M. & Drahmann, A., ‘Nieuw beoordelingskader voor Ffw-ontheffingen: probleem opgelost?’, Bouwrecht 2010, p. 181 e.v.Google Scholar

FLEURKE (2008)Google Scholar

Fleurke, F.M., What Use for Article 95(5) EC? An Analysis of Land Oberösterreich and Republic of Austria v Commission, in Journal of Environmental Law, 20(2), 2008, pp. 267–278.Google Scholar

FLEURKE & TROUWBORST (2011)Google Scholar

Fleurke, F.M. & Trouwborst, A., Kolencentrales, robuuste verbindingen en EU-milieurichtlijnen: balanceren tussen nationale en Europese doelstellingen, NtEr, 2011 (12), p. 95–103Google Scholar

FLORIJN (2009)Google Scholar

Florijn, L.T., De Europees richtlijn luchtkwaliteit en de veehouderij: een mission impossible, in Milieu & Recht, 2005, nr. 5, pp. 278–284.Google Scholar

FOGLEMAN (2006)Google Scholar

Fogleman, V., Enforcing the Environmental Liability Directive: Duties, Powers and Self-Executing Provisions, in Environmental. Liability, 2006, pp. 127–146.Google Scholar

FOIS (2008)Google Scholar

Fois, P., Il Diritto Ambientale nell’Ordinamento dell’Unione Europea, in Cordini G, Fois P. and Marchisio S, Diritto Ambientale, Profili Internazionali, Europei e Comparati, Giappichelli, 2008, 6th edition, pp. 51–97.Google Scholar

FRANSEN (2008),Google Scholar

Fransen, D.S.P., Wet luchtkwaliteiteisen, in Tijdschrift Bouwrecht, 2008, nr. 2, pp. 96 ff.Google Scholar

FRERIKS (2005),Google Scholar

Freriks, A.A., (Herziene) Natuurbeschermingswet 1998 in werking; implementatie van de Vogel- en Habitatrichtlijnen nader voltooiing, in Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht, 2005, nr. 6, pp. 207–213.Google Scholar

GARCIA-URETA (2005)Google Scholar

Garcia-Ureta, A., Nature Conservation, in The Yearbook of European Environmental Law, Oxford, 2005, pp. 371–394.Google Scholar

GASPARINETTI (2009)Google Scholar

Gasparinetti, M., Air Quality: A Breathtaking Directive?, in The protection of ambient air in international and European law, Eleven, 2009, pp. 123–134.Google Scholar

GERADIN (1994)Google Scholar

Geradin, D., Trade and Environmental Protection, in Yearbook of European Law, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 151–199.Google Scholar

GILHUIS (1993)Google Scholar

Gilhuis, P.C., Tussen verandering en continuïteit: het hoofdstuk over vergunningen en algemene regels, in Milieu & Recht, 1993, nr. 2, pp. 86–96.Google Scholar

GILHUIS (2006)Google Scholar

Gilhuis, P.C., Algemene aspecten, in Backes, Ch.W., Gilhuis, P.C. & Koeman, N.S.J. (eds.), Milieurecht, Kluwer, 2006, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

GILHUIS & VERSCHUUREN (2007)Google Scholar

Gilhuis, P.C. & Verschuuren, J.M., Is er nog verschil en moet er nog verschil zijn?, in Gilhuis & Verschuuren (eds.), Is er nog verschil tussen Europa en Nederlands milieurecht, Boom Juridische uitgevers, 2003, pp. 125–133.Google Scholar

GORISSEN (2008)Google Scholar

Gorissen, N.H.A, Gewekt vertrouwen in Europees perspectief, Ph.D. dissertation University of Maastricht 2008, Sdu, 2008.Google Scholar

GORMLEY (2010)Google Scholar

Gormley, L.W., Free Movements of Goods and Their Use – What Is the Use of It?, in Fordham International Law Journal, 33, 2010, pp. 1589–1628.Google Scholar

GORMLEY (2015)Google Scholar

Gormley, L. W. 2015. Inconsistencies and Misconceptions in the Free Movement of Goods, European Law Review, 40(6), 925–939.Google Scholar

GRIMEAUD (2001),Google Scholar

Grimeaud, D., Reforming EU Water Law: Towards Sustainability?, in European Environmental Law Review, 2001, vol. 10, pp. 41–51.Google Scholar

GROEN (1988)Google Scholar

Groen, R.H., De provicie in het nieuwe stelsel van de afvalstoffenwetgeving, in Milieu & Recht, 1988, nr. 6, pp. 245–250.Google Scholar

GROOTHUIJSE (2007)Google Scholar

Groothuijse, F., De nakoming van de gebiedsbeschermende verplichtingen uit de Vogel- en Habitatrchtlijn: een spoedonderzoek, in Van Utrecht via Brussel naar Maastricht, Kluwer, 2007, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar

GROUSSOT (2005)Google Scholar

Groussot, X., Creation, Development and Impact of the General Principles of Community Law: Towards a Jus Commune Europaeum? 2005 Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar

GROUSSOT (2006)Google Scholar

Groussot, X., General Principles of Community Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar

GUADEMENT (2001)Google Scholar

Guadement, Y., Traité de Droit Administratif, Tome 1, Droit administratief general, 16th edition, 2001.Google Scholar

GUIZZI (1990)Google Scholar

Guizzi, V., La Legge La Pergola N. 86/89: Una impostazione nuova del circuito decisionale e operative Italia-Comunitá, in Rivista di Diritto Europeo, 1990, pp. 3 ff.Google Scholar

HAIGH (1984)Google Scholar

Haigh, N., EEC Environmental Policy & Britain. An Essay and a Handbook, Environmental Data Services, 1984.Google Scholar

HAMPTON (2005)Google Scholar

Hampton, P., Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement, March 2005.Google Scholar

HARDENBERG & VAN DE PEPPEL (1997)Google Scholar

Hardenberg, E. & van de Peppel, R.A., Coördinatie van verguningen in het milieurecht, in Milieu & Recht, 1997, nr. 2, pp. 39–43.Google Scholar

HENSELMANS (1988),Google Scholar

Henselmans, J.V., Afval 2000, in Milieu & Recht 1988, nr. 6, pp. 215–222.Google Scholar

HAYTHORNTHWAITE (2007)Google Scholar

Haythornthwaite, R., Better Regulation in Europe, in Weatherill (2007), Better Regulation, SOIECL, 2007, pp. 19–26Google Scholar

HAYWARD (2000)Google Scholar

Hayward, T., Constitutional Environmental Rights: A Case for Political Analysis, in Political Studies, 48, 2000, pp. 558–572.Google Scholar

HERTIN, JACOB AND VOLKEY (2008)Google Scholar

Hertin, J., Jacob, K. & Volkery, A., Appraisal, Policy, in Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A. (eds.), Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating Environment or Sustainability, Edward Elgar, 2008, pp. 114–133.Google Scholar

HERTIN ET AL. (2009a)Google Scholar

Hertin, J., Turnpenny, J., Jordan, A., Nilsson, M., Russel, D. & Nykvist, B., Rationalising the Policy Mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process, in Environmental and Planning, 2009 41(5), pp. 1185–1200.Google Scholar

HERTIN ET AL. (2009b)Google Scholar

Hertin, J., Jacob, K., Pesch, U. & Pacchi, C., The production and use of knowledge in Regulatory Impact Assessment: An empirical analysis, in Forest Policy and Economics, 2009 11(5–6), pp. 413–421.Google Scholar

HERTIN (2016)Google Scholar

Hertin, J., Making Government More Reflexive: The Role of Regulatory Impact Assessment, Ph.D. dissertation, Wageningen University.Google Scholar

HEYES (2009)Google Scholar

Heyes, A., Is Environmental Regulation Bad for Competition? A survey, in Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2009, 26, pp. 1–28Google Scholar

HILLEGERS, LAM & NIJMEIJER (2006)Google Scholar

Hilleger, S., Lam, T.E.P.A., & Nijmeijer, A.G.A., Het wetvoorstel luchtkwaliteit nader beschouwt, in Milieu & Recht, 2006, nr. 10, pp. 597–605.Google Scholar

HINTON (1997)Google Scholar

Hinton, E.F., ‘Balancing Justice, Expediency, and Legal Certainty: The Free Movement of Goods in the European Union’ (1997) 5 Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 1–28.Google Scholar

HOFHUIS (2006)Google Scholar

Hofhuis, Y., Minimumharmonisatie in het Europees recht, s.n., Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam, 2006.Google Scholar

HOITINK (1998)Google Scholar

Hoitink, J.E., Bestaande rechten in het milieurecht, Tjeek Willink, 1998.Google Scholar

HOLWERDA (2011)Google Scholar

Holwerda, J.M., Deploying Carbon Capture and Storage ‘Safely’: The Scope for Member States of the EU to Adopt More Stringent CO2 Stream-Purity Criteria under EU Law, [2011] Climate Law, nr. 2, pp. 37–61.Google Scholar

HORDIJK (1993)Google Scholar

Hordijk, M.G., Een nieuwe wet voor het milieubeheer, Milieu & Recht, 1993, nr. 2, pp. 66–74.Google Scholar

JACOB ET AL. (2008)Google Scholar

Jacob, Klaus et al., Improving the Practice of Impact Assessment (EVIA 2008)Google Scholar

JACOBS (1988)Google Scholar

Jacobs, F.G., The Protection of the Environment under the Single European Act, in Schwarze, J. & Schermers, H.G. (eds.), Structure and Dimension of European Community Policy – Structure et dimensions des politiques communautaires, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988, pp. 117–122.Google Scholar

JACOBS (2006)Google Scholar

Jacobs, F.G, The Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of the Environment, in Journal of Environmental Law (18)2, 2006, pp. 185–205.Google Scholar

JACQUÉ (1986)Google Scholar

Jacqué, P., The ‘Single European Act’ and Environmental Policy, in Environmental Policy and Law, 1986, vol. 16, pp. 122–124.Google Scholar

JANS (1989)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Europeesrerchtelijke grenzen aan nationaal milieubeleid, in Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving, 1989, pp. 217–240.Google Scholar

JANS (1991)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Europees Milieurecht in Nederland, Wolters-Noordhoff, 1991.Google Scholar

JANS (1992a)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Evenredigheid: ja, maar waartussen?, in Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving, 1992, pp. 751–770.Google Scholar

JANS (1992b)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Wat staat er nu in 100A lid 4 EEG-Verdrag?, in NJB, 1992, No. 19, p. 616.Google Scholar

JANS (1993)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Zelfvoorziening: beginsel van milieubescherming?, in Milieu & Recht, 1993, nr. 12, pp. 708–713.Google Scholar

JANS (1996a)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., The Development of EC Environmental Law, in Winter (ed.), European Environmental Law. A Comparative Perspective, Dartmouth, 1996, pp. 271–276.Google Scholar

JANS (1996b)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Objectives and Principles of EC Environmental Law, in Winter (ed.), European Environmental Law. A Comparative Perspective, Dartmouth, 1996, pp. 276–296.Google Scholar

JANS (1996c)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., The Competences for EC Environmental Law, in Winter (ed.), European Environmental Law. A Comparative Perspective, Dartmouth, 1996, pp. 317–340.Google Scholar

JANS (1998)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Hof van Justitie, EG, 25 juni 1998; C-203/96, Noot, in Milieu & Recht, 1998, No. 11, pp. 292–293.Google Scholar

JANS (1999a)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., The Status of the Self-Sufficiency and Proximity Principles with Regard to the Disposal and Recovery of Waste in the European Community, in Journal of Environmental Law, 11(1), 1999, pp. 121–156.Google Scholar

JANS (1999b)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., The Relationship between the IPPC Directive and Other EC Environmental Law, in Backes, Ch. & Betlem, G. (eds.), Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 43–50.Google Scholar

JANS (2000a)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Annotatie bij ECJ C-318/98 Fornasar, in Milieu & Recht, 2000, pp. 208–211.Google Scholar

JANS (2000b)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Evenredigheid Revisited, in Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving, 2000, pp. 270–282.Google Scholar

JANS (2000c)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Boekbespreking, R.H. van Ooik, De keuze der rechtsgrondslag voor besluiten van Europese Unie, in Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving, 2000, p. 471.Google Scholar

JANS (2000d)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., European Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar

JANS (2005)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Noot aan Deponiezweckverband Eiterköpfe, in Milieu & Recht, 2005, pp. 440–443.Google Scholar

JANS (2007)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Minimum Harmonisation and the Role of the Principle of Proportionality, in Umweltrecht und Umweltwissenschaft: Festschrift für Eckard Rehbinder, 2007, pp. 705–717.Google Scholar

JANS (2008a)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., HvJ EG 19 juni 2008, nr. C-219/07, Noot, in Milieu & Recht, 2008, vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 446–447.Google Scholar

JANS (2008b)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Richtlijn 96/62/EG inzake de beordeling en het beheer van de luchtkwaliteit art. 7 lid 3, HvJ EG 25 julie 2008 C-237/07, in Milieu & Recht, 2008, nr. 8, pp. 511–515.Google Scholar

JANS (2010)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Stop the Integration Principle, in Fordham International Law Journal, 33(5), 2010, nr. 5, 1533 ff.Google Scholar

JANS (2011)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Who Is the Referee? Access to Justice in a Globalised Legal Order, in Review of European Administrative Law, 4(1), 2011, pp. 85–97.Google Scholar

JANS ET AL. (2007)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., De Lange, R., Prechal, S. & Widdershoven, R.J.G.M., Europeanization of Public Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar

JANS, SEVENSTER & JANSSEN (2007)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Sevenster, H.G. & Janssen, J.M.P., Environmental Spill-Overs into General Community Law, in Fordham International Law Journal, 31(5), 2007, pp. 1360–1386.Google Scholar

JANS, SQUINTANI ET AL. (2009)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H., Squintani, L. with Aragao, A., Macrory, R. & Winter, B.W., ‘Gold Plating’ of European Environmental Measures, in Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 6(4), 2009, pp. 417–435.Google Scholar

JANS & VEDDER (2008)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H. & Vedder, H.H.B., European Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar

JANS & VEDDER. (2012)Google Scholar

Jans, J.H. & Vedder, H.H.B., European Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

JEFREYS (1991)Google Scholar

Jefreys, R., The Role of Legislative Draftsman in the UK in Making and Implementing EC Law, in RegelMaat, 1991, pp. 39 ff.Google Scholar

JENDROSKA (2006)Google Scholar

Jendroska, J., Public Information and Participation in EC Environmental Law, in Macroy, (ed.), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2006, pp. 61–84.Google Scholar

JENKINS (1998)Google Scholar

Jenkins, R., Environmental Regulation and International Competitiveness: A Review of Literature and Some European Evidence, The United National University, INTECH, Discussion Paper Series,#9801, 1998.Google Scholar

JONGMA (2002)Google Scholar

Jongma, M.P., De mileuvergunning, Kluwer, 2002.Google Scholar

JONGMA (2003)Google Scholar

Jongma, M.P., De IPPC-richtlijn als inspiratiebron, in: Gilhuis, P.C. & Verschuuren, J.M., Is er nog verschil tussen Europees en Nederlands milieurecht?, Den Haag: BJu 2003, p. 57–77.Google Scholar

JONGMAN & KAMPHORST (2002)Google Scholar

Jongman, R. H., Kamphorst, D., Council of Europe. Committee for the Activities of the Council of Europe in the Field of Biological and Landscape Diversity, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasburg 2002.Google Scholar

JORDAN (2001)Google Scholar

Jordan, A., National Environmental Ministries: Managers or Ciphers of European Union Environmental Policy?, in Public Administration, 2001, vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 643–663.Google Scholar

KAT (2005)Google Scholar

Kat, W., Effects on the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive on Environmental Protection, in Revue de Métallurgie, 2005, nr. 6, pp. 55–58.Google Scholar

KEADING (2007)Google Scholar

Keading, M., Administrative Convergence Actually, in Journal of European Integration, 2007, vol. 29, pp. 425 ff.Google Scholar

KIIVER (2007)Google Scholar

Kiiver, P., The Treaty of Lisbon, the National Parliaments and the Principle of Subsidiarity, in Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15, 2007, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar

KLABBERS (2001)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., International Law in Community Law: The Law and Politics of Direct Effect, in Yearbook of European Law, 2001, vol. 21, pp. 263?298.Google Scholar

KLATTE (1983)Google Scholar

Klatte, E.R., Tien jaar Europees milieubeleid (1973–1983), een balans, in Milieu & Recht 1983, vol. 10, pp. 298–312.Google Scholar

KNEGTERING (2009)Google Scholar

Knegtering, E., The Featheries and the Furries, Species Characteristics and Tendencies in Public Species Conservation, Ph.D. dissertaion, University of Groningen, 2009.Google Scholar

KNIFF (2010)Google Scholar

Kniff, C.L., Beste beschikbare technieken, in Milieu & Recht, 2010, nr. 2, pp. 150–158.Google Scholar

KOELEMEIJER ET AL. (2005)Google Scholar

Koelemeijer, R.B.A., Backes, Ch.W., Blom, W.F., Bouwman, A.A. & Hammingh, P., Consequenties van de EU-luchtkwaliteitrichtlijnen voor ruimtelijk onwikkelingsplannen in verschillende EU-landen, Report 500052001/2005, Centrum voor Omgevingsrecht en Beleid/NILOS, Universiteit Utrecht, 2005.Google Scholar

KOEMAN (1991)Google Scholar

Koeman, N.S.J., Publiek-private samenwerking en afvalstoffen, in Jans & Van Acht (eds.), Afvalstoffenrecht, Tjeenk Willink, 1991, pp. 47–55.Google Scholar

KOEMAN (2005),Google Scholar

Koeman, N.S.J., Het Besluit Luchtkwaliteit: hoe nu verder?, in Tijdschrift Bouwrecht, 2005, nr. 6, pp. 504 ff.Google Scholar

KOEMAN & TEN VEEN (2006)Google Scholar

Koeman, N. & Ten Veen, A., Netherlands, in AA.VV. 273–279. The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Environmental Law 2006, Global Legal Group, 2006, Chapter 35.Google Scholar

KOLE (1996)Google Scholar

Kole, R.A., Naar een aanvaarbare Flora- en Faunawet?, in Het Vogeljaar, 1996, nr. 4, pp. 171–174.Google Scholar

KONSTADINIDES (2009)Google Scholar

Konstadinides, T., Division of Powers in European Union Law: The Delimitation of Internal Competence between the EU and the Member States, Kluwer Law International, 2009.Google Scholar

KOOPMANS (1993)Google Scholar

Koopmans, A.J.C., Enkele kritische opmerkingen uit het oogpunt van Faunabescherming en Natuurbescherming over wetsontwerp 23 147 voor een nieuwe Flora- en Faunawet, in Backes & Koopmans, Flora- en faunawet, Tjeenk Willing, 1993, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar

KORTMANN (1991)Google Scholar

Kortmann, C.A.J.M., De vorm van implementatie van EEG-recht, in RegelMaat, 1991, pp. 47 ff.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1987)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., The Single European Act and Environmental Protection: Reflection on Several New Provisions in Community law, in Common Market Law Review, 1987, vol. 24, pp. 659–688.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1990)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., EEC Treaty and Environmental Policy, Sweet & Maxwell, 1990.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1992)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., The implementation of Environmental Laws by the European Economic Communities, German Yearbook of International Law; 34, 1992, pp. 9–53.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1993a)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., The Interdependency of Community ad Member States Activity on Nature Protection within the European Community, Ecological Law Quarterly, 1993, vol. 20, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1993)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., Economic, Fiscal and Other Financial Measures to Contribute to Waste Prevention, in Wiggers-Rust, e.o. (eds.), Waste Prevention in the EEC, Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1996)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., The Elaboration of EC Environmental Legislation, in Winter, (ed.), European Environmental Law: A Comparative Perspective, Dartmouth, 1996, pp. 297–316.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1996b)Google Scholar

Krämer, L, Public Interest Litigation in Environmental Matters before European Courts, Journal of Environmental Law. 8, 1996, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (1997)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., Focus on European Environmental Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 1997.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (2000)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., Differentiation in EU Environmental Policy, in European Environmental Law Review, 2000, pp. 133–140.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (2002)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., Casebook on EU Environmental Law, Hart Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar

KRÄMER. (2005a)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., Directive 2004/35 on Environmental Liability and Environmental Principles, in Tijdschrift voor Milieuschade en Aansprakelijkheidsrecht, 2005, vol. 4, pp. 131–134.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (2005b)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., De positie van de milieuorganisaties als gevolg van de Richtlijn Milieuaansprakelijkheid, in Mellenberg, R. & Uylenburg, R. (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid voor schade aan de natuur, Europa Law Publishing, 2005, pp. 75–91.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (2006)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., Thirty Years of Environmental Governance in the European Union, in Macroy, (ed.), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2006, pp. 555–576.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (2007)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., EC Environmental Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 6th edition, 2007.Google Scholar

KRÄMER (2011)Google Scholar

Krämer, L., EC Environmental Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 7th edition, 2011.Google Scholar

KROMAREK (1988)Google Scholar

Kromarek, P., Commentaire de l’Acte unique européen en matière d’environnement, Revue juridique de l’ environnement 1988 (1), pp. 75–92.Google Scholar

KWISTHOUT (2002)Google Scholar

Kwisthout, J.K.B.H., Van afval naar stoffen, in Dresden, & Uylenburg, (eds.), Afvalstoffen: Actuele thema’s rond afval en stoffen, Kluwer aan den Rijn, 2002, pp. 67–83.Google Scholar

LAAN (2002)Google Scholar

Laan, R.G.J., Grenzen voor Afval, in Dresden, & Uylenburg, (eds.), Afvalstoffen: Actuele thema’s rond afval en stoffen, Kluwer aan den Rijn, 2002, pp. 25–38.Google Scholar

LEYLAND & ANTHONY (2008)Google Scholar

Leyland, P. & Anthony, G., Textbook on Administrative Law, 6th edition, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 215–218.Google Scholar

LAMBERTS (1977)Google Scholar

Lamberts, C., Milieurecht, Kluwer, 1977.Google Scholar

LANGLET & SAID MAHMOUDI (2016)Google Scholar

Langlet, D. & Mahmoudi, S., EU Environmental Law and Policy, Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

LANOIE, PATRY & LAJEUNESSE (2008)Google Scholar

Lanoie, P., Patry, M. & Lajeunesse, R., Environmental regulation and Productivity: Testing the Porter Hypothesis, in Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 2008, pp. 121–128.Google Scholar

LAVRANOS (2010)Google Scholar

Lavranos, N., Protecting European Law from International Law, in European Foreign Affairs Review, 2010, vol. 20, pp. 265–282.Google Scholar

LAVRYSEN & THEUNIS (2007)Google Scholar

Lavrysen, L. & Theunis, J., The Right to the Protection of a Healthy Environment in the Belgian Constitution: Retrospect and International Perspective, in Larmuseau, I., Constitutional rights to an ecologically balanced environment, VlaamseVereniging voor Omgevingsrecht, 2007, pp. 9–29.Google Scholar

LEE (2003)Google Scholar

Lee, M., Public Participation, Procedure, and Democratic Deficit in EC Environmental Law, in The Yearbook of European Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, 2003, vol. 3., pp. 193–226.Google Scholar

LEE (2005)Google Scholar

Lee, M., EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making, Hart Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar

LEEMANS (2007)Google Scholar

Leemans, T.C., De Nederlandse milieurichtlijnen en BBT: de toetsing door de rechter, in Teesing, N. (ed.), Nederlandse milieurichtlijnen en beste beschikbare technieken, Verslag van de 95ª ledenvergadering van de Vereniging voor Milieurecht op 28 maart 2007, Boom Juridisch Uitgevers, 2007, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar

LEEMANS (2008)Google Scholar

Leemans, T.C., De toetsing door de bestuursrechter in milieugeschillen (diss. Leiden), Den Haag: BJu 2008.Google Scholar

LEENEN (1976)Google Scholar

Leenen, H.J.J., Milieuhygiënerecht, 2^de drukt, Samson, 1976.Google Scholar

LEFEVERE (1997)Google Scholar

Lefevere, J.G.J., The New Directive on Ambient Air Quality Assessment and Management, European Environmental Law Review; 6(7), 1997, pp. 210–213.Google Scholar

LEIJENDEKKER-VAN KAAM (1988)Google Scholar

Leijendekker-van Kaam, H.P.H.M., Integratie van de afvalstoffenwetgeving, in Milieu & Recht, 1988, nr. 6, pp. 206–214.Google Scholar

LENAERTS (1994)Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K., The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Environment in the European Union: Keeping the Balance of Federalism, in Fordham International Law Journal, 1994, vol. 17, pp. 864–895.Google Scholar

LENAERTS & NUFFEL (2005)Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K. & van Nuffel, P., Constitutional Law of the European Union, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell, 2005.Google Scholar

LENAERTS & VAN NUFFEL (2011)Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K. & van Nuffel, P., European Union Law, 3rd edition, Sweet & Maxwell, 2011.Google Scholar

LENSCHOW (2010)Google Scholar

Lenschow, A., Chapter 13 – Environmental Policy, in Wallace, H., Pollack, M.A. & Young, A.R., Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 307–330.Google Scholar

LENZ & BORCHARDT (EDS.) (2003)Google Scholar

Lenz, C.O. & Borchardt, K.D. (eds.), EU- und EG-Vertrag. Kommentar, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 2003.Google Scholar

LOOPUYT-VAN DEN BERG (1988)Google Scholar

Loopuyt-van den Berg, L.M., Constructief overleg tussen overheid en bedrijfsleven noodzakelijk, in Milieu & Recht 1988, nr. 6, p. 222–229.Google Scholar

LIEFFERINK & ANDERSEN (1998a)Google Scholar

Liefferink, D. & Andersen, M.S., Greening the EU: National Positions in the Run-Up to the Amsterdam Treaty, in Environmental Politics, 7(3), 1998, pp. 66–93.Google Scholar

LIEFFERINK & ANDERSEN (1998b)Google Scholar

Liefferink, D. & Andersen, M.S., Strategies of the ‘Green’ Member States in EU Environmental Policy-Making, in Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 1998, p. 254–270.Google Scholar

LOUKA (2004)Google Scholar

Louka, E., Conflicting Integration: The Environmental Law of the European Union, Intersentia, 2004.Google Scholar

LÜBBE-WOLFF (2001)Google Scholar

Lübbe-Wolff, G., Efficient Environmental Legislation – On Different Philosophies on Pollution Control in Europe, in Journal of Environmental Law, 13(1), 2001, pp. 79–87.Google Scholar

LÜBBE-WOLFF (2011)Google Scholar

Luebbe-Wolff, G., Who Has the Last Word? National and Transnational Courts—Conflict and Cooperation, Yearbook of European Law, 30, 2011, pp. 86 ff.Google Scholar

LUST (2007)Google Scholar

Lust, S., Administrative Law in Belgium, in Seerden, René (ed.), Administrative Law of the European Union, its Member States and the United States: A Comparative Analysis, Metro, 2007, pp. 5–60.Google Scholar

MACLEOD ET AL. (2009)Google Scholar

MacLeod, M., Moran, D., Hussain, S. & Bevan, K., The Origins and Appraisal of Regulation, in MacLeod, et al (eds.), Understanding the Costs of Environmental Regulation in Europe, Edward Elgar, 2009, pp. 8–31.Google Scholar

MACRORY (1999)Google Scholar

Macrory, R., Integrated Prevention and Pollution Control: The UK Experience, in Backes, Ch. & Betlem, G. (eds.), Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar

MAES (2006)Google Scholar

Maes, G., Het Standstillbeginsel in Verdragsbepalingen en in Art. 23 G.W.: Progressieve (sociale) Grondrechtenbescherming, in Rechtskundig Weekblad 2005–2006, nr. 28, pp. 1081–1094.Google Scholar

MAK (2004)Google Scholar

Mak, P.J., Luchtkwaliteiteisen: niet nieuwe wel hot, in Milieu & Recht, 2004, nr. 5, pp. 322–328.Google Scholar

MALLENBERG (2005)Google Scholar

Mallenberg, R., Verslag van de Eerste paneeldiscussie, in Mellenberg, R. & Uylenburg, R. (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid voor schade aan de natuur, Europa Law Publishing, 2005, pp. 153–163.Google Scholar

MANDERS ET AL. (2009)Google Scholar

Manders, A.M.M., Schaap, M., Jozwicka, M., van Arkel, F., Weijers, E. & Matthijsen, J., The contribution of sea salt to PM10 and PM2.5 in the Netherlands, Netherlands Research Programme on Particulate Matter, 2009.Google Scholar

MANT (1995)Google Scholar

Mant, H., The Proposed Directive on Ambient Air Quality Assessment and Management, in European Environmental Law Review, 4(2), 1995, pp. 50–52.Google Scholar

MASTENBROEK (2007)Google Scholar

Mastenbroek, E., The Politics of Compliance, University of Leiden, Ph.D. Thesis, 2007.Google Scholar

MASTENBROEK (2009)Google Scholar

Mastenbroek, E., Surviving the Deadline, in European Union Politics 2009, pp. 371 ff.Google Scholar

MEIJER DREES (1990)Google Scholar

Meijer Drees, F.J., Afvalstoffenbeleid, toegespits op de regelgeving in Nederland, in Meijer Drees & Van Velzen (eds.), Afvalstoffenbeleid, Tjeenk Willink 1990, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar

MEIJER & ZWIER (2012)Google Scholar

Meijer, E. & Zwier, W., Voorjaarsschoonmaak in het natuurbeschermingsrecht: minder geld, minder regels, minder bescherming, in Milieu & Recht, 2012, jaargang 39, afl.3, pp. 160–171.Google Scholar

MCMANUS (2006)Google Scholar

McManus, F., European Noise Law, in Macroy, (ed.), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2006, pp. 371–382.Google Scholar

MICHIELS (2007)Google Scholar

Michiels, L., Doorbreking en verhaal van handhavingkosten, in Van Utrecht via Brussel naar Maastricht, Kluwer, 2007, pp. 185–202.Google Scholar

MISONNE (2011)Google Scholar

Misonne, D., Droit Européen de l’environnement et de la santé. L’embition d’un niveau élevé de protection, Anthemis, 2011.Google Scholar

MONTINI (2009)Google Scholar

Montini, M., EC Legislation on Air Pollution: From Guidelines to Limit Values, in Post, H. (ed.), The Protection of Ambient Air in International and European Law, Eleven, 2009, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar

MORENO (2006)Google Scholar

Moreno, A.G., Environmental Impact Assessment in EC Law, in Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law, Macroy, (ed.), Europa Law Publishing, 2006, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar

MORTELMANS (1990)Google Scholar

Mortelmans, K.J.M., Afvalverwerking en de interne markt, in Nederlandsch Juristenblad, 1990, pp. 1118–1119.Google Scholar

MORTELMANS (1992)Google Scholar

Mortelmans, K.J.M., EEG-Minimum-harmonisatie en consumentenrecht, in Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht, 1992, pp. 170–186.Google Scholar

MORTELMANS (1994)Google Scholar

Mortelmans, K.J.M., De interne markt en het facettenbeleid na het Keck-arrest: nationaal beleid, vrij verkeer of harmonisatie, in Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving 1994, Vol. 4 pp. 236–250.Google Scholar

MORTELMANS (2008)Google Scholar

Mortelmans, K.J.M., Chapter VIII – The Functioning of the Internal Market: The Freedoms, in Kapteyn, et al. (eds.), The Law of the European Union and of the European Communities, 4th edition, Kluwer Law International, 2008.Google Scholar

NAGL, MOOSMANN & SCHNEIDER (2006)Google Scholar

Nagl, C., Moosmann, L. & Schneider, J., Assessment of Plans and Programmes Reported under 1996/62/EC – Final Report Service Contract to the European Commission – DG Environment Contract No. 070402/2005/421167/MAR/C1.Google Scholar

NAO (2006)Google Scholar

National Audit Office, Evaluation of Regulatory Impact Assessments 2005–06, NAO.Google Scholar

NASH (2009)Google Scholar

Nash, H.A., The Revised Directive on Waste: Resolving Legislative Tensions in Waste Management?, in Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 21, 2009, pp. 139–149.Google Scholar

NEFRAMI (2012)Google Scholar

Neframi, E., Mixed Agreements as a Source of European Union Law, in Cannizzaro, E., Palchieri, P. & Wessel, R.A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union, Martinus Nijhof Publishers, 2012, pp. 325–349.Google Scholar

NELSON (1993)Google Scholar

Nelson, E., Waste prevention: products, in Wiggers-Rust, e.o. (eds.), Waste Prevention in the EEC, Tjeenk Willink, 1993, pp. 39–44.Google Scholar

NEUERBURG & VERFAILLE (1991)Google Scholar

Neuerburg, E.N. & Verfaille, P., Schets van het Nederlands milieurecht, Samsom/Vuga, 1991.Google Scholar

NEVEN (2005)Google Scholar

Neven, M.G.G. e.o. Eurosites Insights. Image, implementation, Interpretation and Integration of Natura 2000 in European Perspective, Alterra Rapport 2005.Google Scholar

NICOLAYSEN (1988)Google Scholar

Nicolaysen, G., Environmental Policy before the Single European Act, in Schwarze, J. & Schermers, H.G. (eds.), Structure and Dimension of European Community Policy – Structure et dimensions des politiques communautaires, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988, pp.111–115.Google Scholar

NOTARO (1999)Google Scholar

Notaro, N., Case C-203/96, Chemische Afvalstoffen Dusseldorp BV and Others v. Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Judgment of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 25 June 1998, [1998] ECR I-4075, in Common Market Law Review, 1999, Vol 36, pp. 1309–1323.Google Scholar

O’REILLY (1996)Google Scholar

O’Reilly, J.Sc., Coping with Community Legislation – A Practitioner’s Reaction, in Statute Law Review, 17(1), 1996, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar

ONG (1998)Google Scholar

Ong, D.M., The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES, 1973): Implications of Recent Developments in International and EC Environmental Law, Journal of Environmental Law, 1(2), 1998, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar

OOSTERHAGEN (1989)Google Scholar

Oosterhagen, M.T., Doelmatig inzamelen in de zin van rtikel 3 lid 2 AW, in Milieu & Recht 1989, nr. 4, pp. 157–163.Google Scholar

OOSTERHUIS ET AL. (2006)Google Scholar

Oosterhuis, F., Monier, V., Görlach, C., Jarvis, A., Medhurst, J., Kuik, O., Vanner, R., Ekins, P., Jantzen, J., van der Woerd, H., Vercaemst, P., Huybrechts, D. and Meynaerts, E., Ex post Estimates of Costs to Business of EU environmental Legislation, Final Report to DG Environment, April 2006.Google Scholar

OOSTERHUIS (2006)Google Scholar

Oosterhuis, F., Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals, 2006 IVM, Vrij Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar

OOSTERHUIS, PEETERS & UYLENBURG (2007)Google Scholar

Oosterhuis, F.H., Peeters, M.G.W.M. & Uylenburg, R., Het beordelingskader an de IPPC Rihtlijn: implementatie, interpretatie en toepassing, STEM publictie 2007/1.Google Scholar

OUWENEEL (1996),Google Scholar

Ouweneel, G., Vogels beschermen in Nederland over 10, 25 en 75 jaar, in Het Vogeljaar, 1996, nr. 5, pp. 193–195.Google Scholar

PAGH (1996)Google Scholar

Pagh, P., EU-miljøret. København : Christian Ejlers, 1996.Google Scholar

PAGH (2006)Google Scholar

Pagh, P., The Battle of European Policy Competences, in Macroy, (ed.), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law, Europa Law Publishing, 2006, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

PALLEMAERTS (1994)Google Scholar

Pallemaerts, M., Van de stranden van blackpool tot de moerassen van Santona: plaatsgebonden verplichtingen in het milieurecht, Milieu & Recht, 1994, p.19.Google Scholar

PALLEMAERTS (1996)Google Scholar

Pallemaerts, M., The Proposed IPPC Directive: Re-Regulation or De-Regulation?, in European Environmental Law Review, 1996, vol. 5, pp. 174–177.Google Scholar

PEETERS, VAN DER WOERD & IN DE BRAEK (2006)Google Scholar

Peeters, M., van der Woerd, F. & in de Braek, G., Evaluatie van het Besluit Financiële Zekerheid – Kwalitatieve Ervaringen 2003–2006, STEM publicatie 2006/2.Google Scholar

PEETERS (2016)Google Scholar

Peeters, M., Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in the EU, in Farber, D.A. and Peeters, M. (eds.), Climate Change Law, 2016 Edward Edgar, chapter 2.Google Scholar

PERFETTI ET AL. (2007)Google Scholar

Perfetti, L. et al., Manuale di Diritto amministrativo, CEDAM 2007.Google Scholar

PESCATORE (1987)Google Scholar

Pescatore, P., Some Critical Remarks on the ‘Single European Act., in Common Market Law Review, 1987, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar

PETERS (1999)Google Scholar

Peters, J.A., Environmental Framework Directives of the European Union – Ideas on Coherence and Suggestions for a Logical Basic Structure, in Backes, Ch. & Betlem, G. (eds.), Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Kluwer Law International, 1999, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar

PETRICCIONE (1989)Google Scholar

Petriccione, R.M., Italy: A New Mechanism for the Implementation of Community Law, in EURLR, 1989, pp. 456 ff.Google Scholar

PIJNACKER HORDIJK (1991)Google Scholar

Pijnacker Hordijk, E.H., Zaak C-169/89, Gurmetterie Van den Burg, arrest van 23 mei 1990, in Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving, 1991, No. 4, pp. 261–271.Google Scholar

PISANI (1998)Google Scholar

Pisani, C., Chemische Afvalstoffen Dusseldorp BV and Others v. Minister van Volkshuisvestiging, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer – Case C-203/96, in Review of European Community & International Law, 7(3), 1998, pp. 312–313.Google Scholar