Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:35:00.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Internal Reasons and the Scope of Blame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

John Skorupski
Affiliation:
Professor of Moral Philosophy, University of St. Andrews
Get access

Summary

One of Bernard Williams' most influential themes has been the claim that there are only “internal” reasons. It is an important element in his moral philosophy, constituting, in particular, the main thrust in a striking critique of “modern morality,” a critique that has interesting affinities with that of Nietzsche. Yet despite the very extensive discussion this theme has produced, it also has been surprisingly elusive. Critics have found it hard to pin down the difference between “internal” and “external” reasons, and even harder to get clear about what bearing the claim that there are only internal reasons has on modern morality. What is it about this thing that Williams wishes to reject?

Here we shall set ourselves a twofold aim: to examine (§§1–3) Williams' argument for “internalism” – the thesis that there are only internal reasons – and to assess (§§4–6) what bearing internalism has on modern moral ideas, or on modern ideas about the nature of the moral.

Williams often seems to weave his internalism into a Humean model of practical reasons – a model that has struck many philosophers as unconvincing, and indeed seriously misleading. However I shall suggest that Hume's conception of practical reasons is neither the only possible starting point, nor the best starting point, for Williams' questions about morality – notably, about the scope of blame.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bernard Williams , pp. 73 - 103
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Darwall, Stephen, Gibbard, Allan, and Railton, Peter, eds. (1997). Moral Discourse and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991a). Philosophy of Right, Allen, W. Wood (ed.), H. B. Nisbet (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991b). Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline, ed. Behler, Ernst (New York: Continuum International, 1991).Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad (1987). “Williams' Argument against External Reasons,” Analysis, 47, pp. 42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1986). “Scepticism about Practical Reason,” Journal of Philosophy, 83, pp. 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millgram, Elijah (ed.) (2001). Varieties of Practical Reasoning (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2000). Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1997). “Reasons and Motivation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, ⅬXⅪ, pp. 98–146.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. (1999). What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome B. (1998). The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Skorupski, John (1999). Ethical Explorations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Skorupski, John (2004). “Morality as Self-Governance: Has it a Future?,” Utilitas, 16, pp. 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1981). Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Fontana Paperbacks).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1995). “Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame,” Making Sense of Humanity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1995a). “How Free Does the Will Need to Be?,” Making Sense of Humanity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1995b). “Replies,” In Altham, J. E. J. and Harrison, Ross (eds.), World, Mind and Ethics, Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 185–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (2001). “Postscript: Some Further Notes on Internal and External Reasons,” in Millgram, Elijah (ed.), Varieties of Practical Reasoning, pp. 90–97.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×