Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:27:52.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

P. J. E. Kail
P. J. E. Kail
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Berkeley's A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge
An Introduction
 , pp. 152 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atherton, M.Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Atherton, M. ‘The Objects of Immediate Perception’, in Daniel, S. (ed.), New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2008, pp. 107–19.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.How to Do Things with Words,2nd edn, ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, M. ‘Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?’, in Winkler, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 34–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, M. R.Locke, 2 vols. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Ayers, M. R. (ed.). George Berkeley: Philosophical Works. Dent: London, 1975.
Bayle, P.Historical and Critical Dictionary, Selections, trans. Popkin, R.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar
Belfrage, B. ‘Berkeley’s Four Concepts of the Soul (1707–1709)’, in Daniel, S. (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 172–87.Google Scholar
Bennett, J.Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, 2 vols., Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bennett, J.Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. ‘Editors Introduction’, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, ed. Dancy, J., Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Berman, D.George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bettcher, T. M.Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology, and the Elusive Subject. London: Continuum, 2007.Google Scholar
Buckle, S. ‘British Sceptical Realism: A Fresh Look at the British Tradition’, European Journal of Philosophy 7 (1999), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. ‘Berkeley’s Puzzle’, in Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 127–43.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D.The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols., Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Cummins, P. ‘Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance’, in Daniel, S. (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 121–52.Google Scholar
Dancy, J.Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Daniel, S. ‘How Berkeley’s Works are Interpreted’, in Parigi, S. (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, S. (ed.). ‘Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance’, in New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2008, pp. 203–30.
Daniel, S. ‘Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001), 239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicker, G.Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, L. ‘Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science’, in Winkler, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 230–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, L. ‘Berkeley’s Argument for Other Minds’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990), 431–40.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R.Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Frankel, M. ‘Berkeley and God in the Quad’, Philosophy Compass 7 (2012), 338–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, M. ‘Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meanings and Minds, Philosophia 37 (2009), 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, A. ‘Berkeley’s Master Argument’, Philosophical Review 83 (1974), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauser, R. ‘Berkeley on the Numerical Identity of what Several Immediately Perceive (Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous iii 247–8), Philosophy Compass 7/8 (2012), 517–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauser, R. ‘The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley’, in Daniel, S. (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 50–81.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C.Berkeley: The Central Arguments. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. ‘Meaning’, Philosophical Review 66 (1957), 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hight, Marc A.Ideas and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Hight, M. and Ott, W. ‘The New Berkeley’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D.A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., rev. Nidditch, P. H., Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Jesseph, D. ‘Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics’, in Winkler, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 266–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesseph, D.Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N.Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Kail, P. ‘Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism’, in Parigi, S. (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kail, P.Projection and Realism in Hume’s Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalderon, M. (ed.). Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.
Locke, J.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H., Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Loeb, L.From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. ‘Experience and its Objects’, in Crane, T. (ed.), The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E. (eds.), The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, 9 vols., London: Thomas Nelson, 1949.
McCracken, C. ‘Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit’, in Atherton, M. (ed.), The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley and Hume. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999, pp. 145–52.Google Scholar
McCracken, C. and Tipton, I. (eds.), Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
McKim, R. ‘Berkeley’s Notebooks’, in Winkler, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, J. ‘Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrence’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008), 567–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malebranche, N.Dialogues Concerning Metaphysics and Religion, trans. Jolley, N. and Scott, D.. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Malebranche, N.The Search After Truth, trans. Lennon, T. and Olscamp, P.. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Migely, G. ‘Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind’, in Daniel, S. (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 153–71.Google Scholar
Muehlmann, R. (ed.). ‘The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy’, in Berkeley’s Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretative and Critical Essays. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995, pp. 89–105.
Newton-Smith, W. H. ‘Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science’, in Foster, J. and Robinson, H. (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1985, pp. 149–61.Google Scholar
Pappas, G.Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Pitcher, G.Berkeley. London: Routledge, 1977.Google Scholar
Richmond, A.Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. R.A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, T. ‘Malebranche’s Cartesianism and Lockean Colours’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995), 387–403.Google Scholar
Schwartz, C. ‘Berkeley and his Contemporaries: The Question of Mathematical Formalism’, in Parigi, S. (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010, pp. 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, W. ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man’, in Colodny, R. (ed.), Science, Perception and Reality. Ridgeview: Humanities Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. ‘Of Primary and Secondary Qualities’, Philosophical Review 99 (1990), 221–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. ‘Hermeneutic Fictionalism’, in French, P. and Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy xxv: Figurative Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, pp. 36–71.Google Scholar
Stoneham, T.Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. ‘Action and Inaction in Berkeley’, in Foster, J. and Robinson, H. (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985, pp. 211–25.Google Scholar
Turbayne, C. (ed.). ‘Lending a Hand to Philonous: The Berkeley, Plato, Aristotle Connection’, in Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays. Manchester University Press, 1982, pp. 295–310.
Westfall, R.The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Williams, M.Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. ‘Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary–Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke?’, in Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 215–28.Google Scholar
Winkler, K.Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, R.Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz: The Concept of Substance in Seventeenth-Century Metaphysics. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Yolton, J.John Locke and the Way of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • P. J. E. Kail, University of Oxford
  • Book: Berkeley's <I>A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge</I>
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736506.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • P. J. E. Kail, University of Oxford
  • Book: Berkeley's <I>A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge</I>
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736506.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • P. J. E. Kail, University of Oxford
  • Book: Berkeley's <I>A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge</I>
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736506.009
Available formats
×