Benefactors and the Polis The Public Gift in the Greek Cities from the Homeric World to Late Antiquity
Book contents
- Benefactors and the Polis
- Benefactors and the Polis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Benefiting the Community in Early Greece
- Part II Classical Benefactors
- Part III Hellenistic Benefactors
- Chapter 5 The Politics of Endowments
- Chapter 6 ‘To be magnanimous and grateful’
- Chapter 7 Socially Embedded Benefaction on Delos
- Part IV Benefactors and the Polis under Rome
- Part V The Decline and Fall of Euergetism?
- Conclusion
- Index
- Index locorum
- References
Chapter 6 - ‘To be magnanimous and grateful’
The Entanglement of Cities and Empires in the Hellenistic Aegean
from Part III - Hellenistic Benefactors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2021
Book contents
- Benefactors and the Polis
- Benefactors and the Polis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Benefiting the Community in Early Greece
- Part II Classical Benefactors
- Part III Hellenistic Benefactors
- Chapter 5 The Politics of Endowments
- Chapter 6 ‘To be magnanimous and grateful’
- Chapter 7 Socially Embedded Benefaction on Delos
- Part IV Benefactors and the Polis under Rome
- Part V The Decline and Fall of Euergetism?
- Conclusion
- Index
- Index locorum
- References
Summary
In the Hellenistic period, cities were the cornerstones of imperial rule. Cities were the loci for the acquisition of capital and manpower, and imperial agents (philoi) were recruited for a large part among Greek civic elites. This chapter departs from the dual premise that premodern empires are negotiated enterprises and that they are often networks of interaction rather than territorial states. The relentless competition between three rival superpowers in the Hellenistic Aegean – the Seleukid, Ptolemaic and Antigonid Empires – gave cities a good bargaining position vis-à-vis these empires. The fact that the imperial courts were dominated by philoi from the Aegean poleis moreover meant that these cities held a central and privileged place in Hellenistic imperialism, and benefited greatly from it. Royal benefactions structured imperial-local interactions. They were instrumental in a complex of reciprocal gift-exchange between empires and cities. Empires most of all needed capital, loyalty and military support. As kings were usually short of funds, the gifts by which they hoped to win the support of cities against their rivals often came in the form of immaterial benefactions like the granting of privileges and the protection of civic autonomy.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Benefactors and the PolisThe Public Gift in the Greek Cities from the Homeric World to Late Antiquity, pp. 137 - 178Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aalders, G. J. D. (1969) ‘Nomos empsuchos’, in Steinmetz, P. (ed.), Politeia und Res Publica. Beiträge zum Verständnis von Politik, Recht und Staat in der Antike; dem Andenken Rudolf Starks gewidmet. Wiesbaden, 315–29.Google Scholar
Ager, S. L. (2003) ‘An uneasy balance: from the death of Seleukos to the battle of Raphia’, in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World. Malden, MA, 35–50.Google Scholar
Agut-Labordère, D. (2017) ‘Persianism through Persianization: the case of Ptolemaic Egypt’, in Strootman, R. and Versluys, M. J. (eds.), Persianism in Antiquity. Stuttgart, 147–62.Google Scholar
Allen, L. (2005) ‘Le roi imaginaire: an audience with the Achaemenid king’, in Hekster, O. and Fowler, R. (eds.), Imaginary Kings: Royal Images in the Ancient Near East, Greece and Rome. Stuttgart, 39–62.Google Scholar
Alston, R., and Van Nijf, O. M. (2011) ‘Political culture in the Greek city after the classical age: introduction and preview’, in Alston, R., van Nijf, O. M. and Williamson, C. (eds.), Political Culture in the Greek City after the Classical Age. Leuven, 1–26.Google Scholar
Andrade, N. J. (2011) ‘Local authority and civic Hellenism: Tarcondimotus, Hierapolis-Castabala and the cult of Perasia’, Anatolian Studies 61: 123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, M. M. (1986) ‘Hellenistic kings, war, and the economy’, The Classical Quarterly 36: 450–66.Google Scholar
Avram, A. (2005) ‘La défense des cités en mer Noire à la basse époque hellénistique’, in Fröhlich, P. and Müller, C. (eds.), Citoyenneté et participation à la basse époque hellénistique. Geneva, 163–82.Google Scholar
Bang, P. F. (2011) ‘Lords of all the world: the state, heterogeneous power and hegemony in the Roman and Mughal empires’, in Bang, P. F. and Bayly, C. A. (eds.), Tributary Empires in Global History. London, 171–92.Google Scholar
Bang, P. F. (2012) ‘Between Aśoka and Antiochos: an essay in world history on universal kingship and cosmopolitan culture in the Hellenistic ecumene’, in Bang, P. F. and Kołodziejczyk, D. (eds.), Universal Empire: A Comparative Approach to Imperial Culture and Representation in Eurasian History. Cambridge, 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang, P. F., and Bayly, C. A. (2011) ‘Tributary empires: towards a global and comparative history’, in Bang, P. F. and Bayly, C. A. (eds.), Tributary Empires in Global History. London, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, T. J. (2008) The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Barkey, K. (2008) Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. S. (2008) Murder among Friends: Violation of Philia in Greek Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bernett, M. (2004) ‘Polis und Politeia. Zur politischen Organisation Jerusalems und Jehuds in der Perserzeit’, in Alkier, A. and Witte, M. (eds.), Die Griechen und das antike Israel. Göttingen, 73–129.Google Scholar
Bertrand, J.-M. (2005) ‘À propos des πάροικοι dans les cités d’Asie Mineure’, in Fröhlich, P. and Müller, C. (eds.), Citoyenneté et participation à la basse époque hellénistique. Geneva, 39–49.Google Scholar
Bickerman, E. J. (1935) ‘La charte séleucide de Jérusalem’, Revue des Études Juives 197–8: 4–35.Google Scholar
Bickerman, E. J. (1948) ‘Une proclamation séleucide relative au temple de Jérusalem’, Syria 25: 67–88.Google Scholar
Bickerman, E. J. (1983) ‘The Seleucid period’, in Yarshater, E. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 3: The Seleucid, Parthian, and Sasanian Periods. Cambridge, 3–20.Google Scholar
Boffo, L. (2013) ‘La “presenza” dei re negli archivi delle poleis ellenistiche’, in Faraguna, M. (ed.), Archives and Archival Documents in Ancient Societies. Trieste, 201–44.Google Scholar
Börm, H. (2015) ‘Hellenistische Poleis und römischer Bürgerkrieg. Staseis im griechischen Osten nach den Iden des März’, in Börm, H., Mattheis, M. and Wienand, J. (eds.), Civil Wars in Ancient Greece and Rome. Stuttgart, 99–125.Google Scholar
Boulay, T. (2014) Arès dans la cité: les poleis et la guerre dans l’Asie Mineure hellénistique. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (1993) ‘The king as benefactor: some remarks on ideal kingship in the age of Hellenism’, in Bulloch, A. W. et al. (eds.), Images and Ideologies: Self-Definition in the Hellenistic World. Berkeley, 7–24.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (2000) Geben und nehmen. Monarchische Wohltätigkeit und Selbstdarstellung im Zeitalter des Hellenismus. Mit einem numismatischen Beitrag von Hans-Christoph Noeske, 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (2001) ‘Grain, timber and money: Hellenistic kings, finance, buildings and foundations in Greek cities’, in Archibald, Z. H. et al. (eds.), Hellenistic Economies. London, 205–14.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (2002) ‘Rhodos als Bildungszentrum der hellenistischen Welt’, Chiron 32: 71–82.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K. (2005) ‘Königliche Ökonomie im Spiegel des Euergetismus der Seleukiden’, Klio 87.1: 102–15.Google Scholar
Bringmann, K., and Von Steuben, H. (1995) Schenkungen hellenistischer Herrscher an griechische Städte und Heiligtümer. 1. Teil: Zeugnisse und Kommentare, ed. Ameling, W. and Schmidt-Dounas, B.. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringmann, K., and Von Steuben, H. (2000) Schenkungen hellenistischer Herrscher an griechische Städte und Heiligtümer. 2.Teil: Historische und archäologische Auswertung, ed. Ameling, W. and Schmidt-Dounas, B.. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugh, G. R. (2014) ‘Mithridates the Great and the freedom of the Greeks’, in Cojocaru, V., Coşkun, A. and Mădălina, D. (eds.), Interconnectivity in the Mediterranean and Pontic World during the Hellenistic and Roman Periods. Cluj-Napoca, 383–96.Google Scholar
Burbank, J., and Cooper, F. (2010) Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton.Google Scholar
Canepa, M. P. (2017) ‘Rival images of Iranian kingship and Persian identity in Post-Achaemenid Western Asia’, in Strootman, R. and Versluys, M. J. (eds.), Persianism in Antiquity. Stuttgart, 201–22.Google Scholar
Capdetrey, L. (2007) Le pouvoir séleucide: territoire, administration, finances d’un royaume hellénistique: 312–129 avant J.C. Rennes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, S. (2010) Hellenistic Democracies: Freedom, Independence and Political Procedure in Some East Greek City-States. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Carstens, A. M. (2011) ‘Achaemenids in Labraunda: a case of imperial presence in a rural sanctuary in Karia’, in Karlsson, L. and Carlsson, S. (eds.), Labraunda and Karia: Proceedings of the International Symposion Commemorating Sixty Years of Swedish Archaeological Work in Labraunda. Uppsala, 121–31.Google Scholar
Cavalier, L., Descat, R., and Des Courtils, J. (eds.) (2011) Basiliques et agoras de Grèce et d’Asia Mineure. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. (1996) Die Verträge zwischen kretischen Poleis in der hellenistischen Zeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. (2005) War in the Hellenistic World: A Social and Cultural History. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Chankowski, A. S. (2010) L’éphébie hellénistique: étude d’une institution civique dans les cités grecques des iles de la mer Égée et de l’Asie Mineure. Paris.Google Scholar
Clancier, P., and Monerie, J. (2014) ‘Les sanctuaires babyloniens à l’époque hellénistique: évolution d’un relais de pouvoir’, Topoi 191: 181–237.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. M. (1995) The Hellenistic Settlements in Europe, the Islands, and Asia Minor. Hellenistic Culture and Society 17. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Couvenhes, J.-C. (2004) ‘Les cités grecques d’Asie Mineure et le mercenariat à l’époque hellénistique’, in Couvenhes, J.-C. and Fernoux, H.-L. (eds.), Les cités grecques et la guerre en Asie Mineure à l’époque hellénistique. Tours, 77–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Altroy, T. N. (2001) ‘Politics, resources, and blood in the Inca empire’, in Alcock, S. E. et al. (eds.), Empires: Perspectives from Archaeology and History. Cambridge, 201–26.Google Scholar
Dickenson, C. P. (2012) ‘On the agora: power and public space in Hellenistic and Roman Greece’, PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Dickenson, C. P., and Van Nijf, O. M. (eds.) (2013) Public Space in the Post-Classical City. Leuven.Google Scholar
Dixon, M. (2007) ‘Corinth, Greek freedom, and the Diadochoi, 323–301 BC’, in Heckel, W., Tritle, L. and Wheatley, P. (eds.), Alexander’s Empire: Formulation to Decay: A Companion to Crossroads of History. Claremont, CA, 151–78.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, S. (2005) City Government in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitriev, S. (2010) The Greek Slogan of Freedom and Early Roman Politics in Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dreyer, B., and Mittag, P. F. (eds.) (2011) Lokale Eliten unter den hellenistischen Königen. Zwischen Kooperation und Konfrontation. Berlin.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (1997) ‘Der Euergetismus im Funktionszusammenhang der kaiserzeitlichen Städte’, in Christol, M. and Masson, O. (eds.), Actes du Xe Congrès International d‘Épigraphie Grecque et Latine. Paris, 305–31.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. (2007) Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Engels, D. (2011) ‘Middle Eastern “feudalism” and Seleukid dissolution’, in Erickson, K. and Ramsey, G. (eds.), Seleucid Dissolution: The Sinking of the Anchor. Wiesbaden, 19–36.Google Scholar
Engels, D. (2014) ‘Antiochos III. der Große und sein Reich. Überlegungen zur “Feudalisierung” der seleukidischen Peripherie’, in Hoffmann, F. and Schmidt, K. S. (eds.), Orient und Okzident in hellenistischer Zeit. Beiträge zur Tagung „Orient und Okzident – Antagonismus oder Konstrukt? Machtstrukturen, Ideologien und Kulturtransfer in hellenistischer Zeit“, Würzburg 10.–13. April 2008. Vaterstetten, 31–76.Google Scholar
Erickson, K. (2011) ‘Apollo-Nabû: the Babylonian policy of Antiochus I’, in Erickson, K. and Ramsey, G. (eds.), Seleucid Dissolution: The Sinking of the Anchor. Wiesbaden, 51–66.Google Scholar
Flamerie de Lachapelle, G. (2012) ‘Les prises de parole d’Antiochus III dans l’œuvre de Tite Live’, Paideia 67: 123–33.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (2010) ‘King, bigger king, king of kings: structuring power in the Parthian world’, in Facella, M. and Kaizer, T. (eds.), Kingdoms and Principalities in the Roman Near East. Stuttgart, 57–79.Google Scholar
Funck, B. (1994) ‘Seleukos Nikator und Ilion. Einige Beobachtungen zum Verhältnis von König und Staat im frühen Hellenismus’, Historische Zeitschrift 258.2: 317–37.Google Scholar
Funck, B. (1996) ‘“König Perserfreund”. Die Seleukiden in der Sicht ihrer Nachbarn (Beobachtungen zu einigen ptolemäischen Zeugnissen des 4. und 3. Jh.s v. Chr.)’, in Funck, B. (ed.), Hellenismus. Tübingen, 195–215.Google Scholar
Gauger, J.-D. (1977) Beiträge zur jüdischen Apologetik. Untersuchungen zur Authentizität von Urkunden bei Flavius Josephus und im I. Makkabäerbuch. Cologne.Google Scholar
Gauthier, P. (1985) Les cités grecques et leurs bienfaiteurs (IVe–Ier siècle av. J.-C.): contribution à l’histoire des institutions. Athens.Google Scholar
Gauthier, P. (1989) ‘Grandes et petits cités: hégémonie et autarcie’, reprinted in P. Gauthier, Études d’histoire et d’institutions grecques: choix d’écrits, ed. Rousset, D.. Geneva, 315–50.Google Scholar
Gauthier, P. (1993) ‘Les cités hellénistiques’, reprinted in P. Gauthier, Études d’histoire et d’institutions grecques: choix d’écrits, ed. Rousset, D.. Geneva, 351–434.Google Scholar
Gauthier, P. (1994) ‘Les rois hellénistiques et les juges étrangers: à propos de décrets de Kimôlos et de Laodicée du Lykos’, in P. Gauthier, Études d’histoire et d’institutions grecques: choix d’écrits, ed. Rousset, D.. Geneva, 113–44.Google Scholar
Grieb, V. (2008) Hellenistische Demokratie. Politische Organisation und Struktur in freien griechischen Poleis nach Alexander dem Großen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1958) ‘Die herrschende Gesellschaft in den hellenistischen Monarchien’, Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 45: 1–16.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (2008) ‘Judicial control of the legislature in Greek states’, in Virgilio, B. (ed.), Studi ellenistici, vol. 20. Pisa, 17–24.Google Scholar
Hamon, P. (2009) ‘Démocraties grecques après Alexandre: à propos de trois ouvrages récents’, Topoi 16: 347–82.Google Scholar
Harders, A.-C. (2016) ‘The making of a queen: Seleukos Nikator and his wives’, in Coškun, A. and McAuley, A. (eds.), Seleukid Royal Women: Creation, Representation and Distortion of Hellenistic Queenship in the Seleukid Empire. Stuttgart, 25–38.Google Scholar
Heinle, M. (2008) ‘Stadtbilder im Hellenismus – Wahrnehmung urbaner Struktur in hellenistischer Zeit’, in Matthaei, A. and Zimmermann, M. (eds.), Stadtbilder im Hellenismus. Berlin, 41–69.Google Scholar
Herman, G. (1981) ‘The “friends” of the early Hellenistic rulers: servants or officials?’, Talanta 12–13: 103–49.Google Scholar
Herman, G. (1997) ‘The court society of the Hellenistic age’, in Cartledge, P., Garnsey, P. and Gruen, E. (eds.), Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography. Berkeley, 199–224.Google Scholar
Hermann, P. (1987) ‘Milesier am Seleukidenhof. Prosopographische Beiträge zur Geschichte Milets im 2. Jhdt. v. Chr’, Chiron 17: 171–92.Google Scholar
Heuss, A. (1937) Stadt und Herrscher des Hellenismus in ihren staats- und völkerrechtlichen Beziehungen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Honigman, S. (2011) ‘King and Temple in 2 Maccabees: the case for continuity’, in Grabbe, L. L. and Lipschits, O. (eds.), Judah between East and West: The Transition from Persian to Greek Rule: ca. 400–200 BCE. London, 91–130.Google Scholar
Hoo, M. (2015) ‘Maanvrouwe aan de Oxus. Baktrisch Ai Khanum als casus voor globalisering in de Oudheid’, Tijdschrift voor Mediterrane Archeologie 27.54: 34–40.Google Scholar
Hoo, M. (2018) ‘Ai Khanum in the face of Eurasian globalisation: a translocal approach to a contested site in Hellenistic Bactria’, Ancient West & East 17: 161–86.Google Scholar
Hoover, O. D. (2005) ‘Ceci n’est pas l’autonomie: the coinage of Seleucid Phoenicia as royal and civic power discourse’, in Chankowski, V. and Duyrat, F. (eds.), Le roi et l’économie: autonomies locales et structures royales dans l’économie de l’empire séleucide: actes des rencontres de Lille, 23 juin (2003) et d’Orléans, 29–30 janvier 2004. Paris, 485–507.Google Scholar
Kah, D. (2015) ‘Soziokultureller Wandel im hellenistischen Priene. Das Zeugnis der Ehrendekrete’, in Matthaei, A. and Zimmermann, M. (eds.), Urbane Strukturen und bürgerliche Identität im Hellenismus. Heidelberg, 389–99.Google Scholar
Kappeler, A. (1993) Russland als Vielvölkerreich. Entstehung, Geschichte, Zerfall, 2nd ed. Munich.Google Scholar
Karlsson, L. (2015) ‘The sanctuary of Zeus with the double axe at Labraunda: from nature sanctuary to Persian paradeisos’, in Winter, E. and Zimmermann, K. (eds.), Zwischen Satrapen und Dynasten. Kleinasien im 4. Jahrhundert. Bonn, 75–82.Google Scholar
Kennell, N. M. (2013) ‘Who were the Neoi?’, in Martzavou, P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), Epigraphical Approaches to the Postclassical Polis: Fourth Century BC to Second Century AD. Oxford, 228–9.Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. (2015) ‘L’éphébie athénienne comme préparation à la guerre du IVe au IIe siècle av. J.-C.’, in Contamine, P., Jouanna, J. and Zink, M. (eds.), La Grèce et la guerre: actes du 25e colloque de la Villa Kérylos à Beaulieu-sur-Mer les 3 et 4 octobre 2014. Paris, 59–104.Google Scholar
Kosmin, P. J. (2013) ‘Seleucid ethnography and indigenous kingship: the Babylonian education of Antiochus I’, in Haubold, J., Lanfranchi, G. B., Rollinger, R. and Steele, J. M. (eds.), The World of Berossos: Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on ‘The Ancient Near East between Classical and Ancient Oriental Traditions’, Hatfield College, Durham 7th–9th July 2010. Wiesbaden, 199–212.Google Scholar
Kosmin, P. J. (2014a) The Land of the Elephant Kings: Space, Territory, and Ideology in the Seleucid Empire. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kosmin, P. J. (2014b) ‘Seeing double in Seleucid Babylonia: rereading the Borsippa Cylinder of Antiochus I’, in Moreno, A. and Thomas, R. (eds.), Patterns of the Past: Epitēdeumata in the Greek Tradition. Oxford, 173–98.Google Scholar
Kuhrt, S., and Sherwin-White, A. (1991) ‘Aspects of Seleucid royal ideology: the cylinder of Antiochus I from Borsippa’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 111: 71–86.Google Scholar
Labarre, G. (2004) ‘Phrourarques et phrouroi des cités grecques d’Asie Mineure à l’époque hellénistique’, in Couvenhes, J.-C. and Fernoux, H.-L. (eds.), Les cités grecques et la guerre en Asie Mineure à l’époque hellénistique. Tours, 221–48.Google Scholar
Lavan, M., Payne, R. E., and Weisweiler, J. (2016) ‘Cosmopolitan politics: the assimilation and subordination of elite cultures’, in Lavan, M. et al. (eds.), Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Universal Rulers, Local Elites, and Cultural Integration in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. Oxford, 1–28.Google Scholar
Lévêque, P. (1968) ‘La guerre à l’époque hellénistique’, in Vernant, J.-P. (ed.), Problèmes de la guerre en Grèce ancienne. Paris, 261–87.Google Scholar
Lipschits, O. (2005) ‘Achaemenid imperial policy, settlement processes in Palestine and the status of Jerusalem in the middle of the fifth century B.C.E.’, in Lipschits, O. and Oeming, M. (eds.), Judah and the Judeans in the Persian, Achaemenid) Period. Winona Lake, IN, 19–52.Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2013) ‘Ruling alone: monarchy in Greek politics and thought’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Splendors and Miseries of Ruling Alone: Encounters with Monarchy from Archaic Greece to the Hellenistic Mediterranean. Stuttgart, 11–24.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2000b) ‘Seleukids and speech-acts: performative utterances, legitimacy and negotiation in the world of the Maccabees’, Scripta Classica Israelica 19: 71–112.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2000c) ‘Fighting poleis of the Hellenistic world’, in van Wees, H. (ed.), War and Violence in Ancient Greece. London, 337–76.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2003) ‘Peer polity interaction in the Hellenistic Age’, Past and Present 180.1: 9–39.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2004) ‘Une culture militaire en Asie mineure hellénistique?’, in Couvenhes, J.-C. and Fernoux, H.-L. (eds.), Les cités grecques et la guerre en Asie Mineure à l’époque hellénistique. Actes de la journée d’études de Lyon, 10 octobre 2003. Tours, 199–220.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2007) ‘Hellenistic honorific statues and their inscriptions’, in Newby, Z. and Leader-Newby, R. (eds.), Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World. Cambridge, 203–20.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (2013) Statues and Cities: Honorific Portraits and Civic Identity in the Hellenistic World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mack, W. (2015) Proxeny and Polis: Institutional Networks in the Ancient Greek World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Magie, D. (1941) ‘The political status of the independent cities of Asia Minor in the Hellenistic period’, in The Greek Political Experience: Studies in Honor of W. K. Prentice. Princeton, 173–86.Google Scholar
Mann, C., and Scholz, P. (eds.) (2012) ‘Demokratie’ im Hellenismus. Von der Herrschaft des Volkes zur Herrschaft der Honoratioren? Mainz.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power, vol. 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Manning, J. G. (2011) ‘Networks, hierarchies, and markets in the Ptolemaic economy’, in Archibald, Z., Davies, J. K. and Gabrielsen, V. (eds.), The Economies of Hellenistic Societies, Third to First Centuries BC. Oxford, 296–323.Google Scholar
Martzavou, P., and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.) (2013) Epigraphical Approaches to the Postclassical Polis, Fourth Century BC to Second Century AD. Oxford.Google Scholar
McNicoll, A. W. (1997) Hellenistic Fortifications from the Aegean to the Euphrates, 2nd rev. ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Meeus, A. (2014) ‘The territorial ambitions of Ptolemy I’, in Hauben, H. and Meeus, A. (eds.), The Age of the Successors and the Creation of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 323–276 B.C. Leuven, 307–22.Google Scholar
Meier, L. (2011) Die Finanzierung öffentlicher Bauten in der hellenistischen Polis. Berlin.Google Scholar
Meijering, R. (2015) ‘Religious support and political gain: the Seleucids, Miletus and Didyma, 301–281 BC’, Talanta 46–7: 237–50.Google Scholar
Meissner, B. (2013) ‘Peace, publicity and Panhellenism: Greek freedom, propaganda, and communication at the great games’, in Birgalias, N., Buraselis, K., Cartledge, P., Gartziou-Tatti, A. and Dimopoulou, M. (eds.), War–Peace and Panhellenic Games: In Memory of Pierre Carlier. Athens, 423–37.Google Scholar
Michels, C. (2010) ‘Zum “Philhellenismus” der Könige von Bithynien, Pontos und Kappadokien’, in Rollinger, R. et al. (eds.), Interkulturalität in der Alten Welt. Vorderasien, Hellas Ägypten und die vielfältigen Ebenen des Kontakts. Wiesbaden, 561–82.Google Scholar
Migeotte, L. (2008) ‘Kriegs- und Verteidigungsfinanzierung in den hellenistischen Städten’, in Burrer, F. and Müller, H. (eds.), Kriegskosten und Kriegsfinanzierung in der Antike. Darmstadt, 151–60.Google Scholar
Mittag, P. F. (2006) Antiochos IV. Epiphanes. Eine politische Biographie. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebergall, A. (2011) ‘Lokale Eliten unter hellenistischen Herrschern: Mithradates VI. von Pontos und die griechischen Eliten Kleinasiens und Griechenlands’, in Dreyer, B. and Mittag, P. F. (eds.), Lokale Eliten unter den hellenistischen Königen. Zwischen Kooperation und Konfrontation. Berlin, 55–79.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (2000) ‘Political conflicts, political debates, and political thought’, in Osborne, R. (ed.), Classical Greece, 500–323 B.C. Oxford, 111–38.Google Scholar
O’Neil, J. L. (2000) ‘Royal authority and city law under Alexander and his Hellenistic successors’, Classical Quarterly 50: 424–31.Google Scholar
O’Neil, J. L. (2003) ‘The ethnic origins of the friends of the Antigonid kings of Macedon’, Classical Quarterly 53.2: 510–22.Google Scholar
O’Neil, J. L. (2006) ‘Places of origin of the officials of Ptolemaic Egypt’, Historia 55.1: 16–25.Google Scholar
Orth, W. (1977) Königlicher Machtanspruch und städtische Freiheit. Untersuchungen zu den politischen Beziehungen zwischen den ersten Seleukidenherrschern (Seleukos I., Antiochos I., Antiochos II.) und den Städten des westlichen Kleinasien. Munich.Google Scholar
Panessa, G. (1990) ‘La “philia” nelle relazioni interstati del mondo greco’, in Nenci, G. and Thür, G. (eds.), Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte, Siena-Pisa, 6.–8. Juni 1988. Cologne, 261–7.Google Scholar
Paschidis, P. (2008) Between City and King: Prosopographical Studies on the Intermediaries between the Cities of the Greek Mainland and the Aegean and the Royal Courts in the Hellenistic Period, 322–190 BC. Athens.Google Scholar
Paschidis, P. (2013) ‘Φίλοι and φιλία between poleis and kings in the Hellenistic Period’, in Mari, M. (ed.), Parole in movimento. Linguaggio politicoe lessico storiografico nel mondo ellenistico. Pisa, 283–98.Google Scholar
Pimouguet-Pédarros, I. (2011) La cité à l’épreuve des rois: le siège de Rhodes par Démétrios Poliorcète, 305–304 av. J.-C. Rennes.Google Scholar
Pitts, M., and Versluys, M. J. (2015) ‘Globalisation and the Roman world: perspectives and opportunities’, in Pitts, M. and Versluys, M. J. (eds.), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture. Cambridge, 3–31.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2006) Il basileus come nomos empsychos tra diritto naturale e diritto divino. Spunti platonici del concetto e sviluppi di età imperiale e tardo-antica. Naples.Google Scholar
Ramsey, G. (2016) ‘The diplomacy of Seleukid women: Apama and Stratonike’, in Coškun, A. and McAuley, A. (eds.), Seleukid Royal Women: Creation, Representation and Distortion of Hellenistic Queenship in the Seleukid Empire. Stuttgart, 87–104.Google Scholar
Rheidt, K. (2015) ‘Polis und Stadtbild im 4. und 3. Jahrhundert v. Chr.’, in Matthaei, A. and Zimmermann, M. (eds.), Urbane Strukturen und bürgerliche Identität im Hellenismus. Heidelberg, 300–29.Google Scholar
Robert, L. (1984) ‘Pline VI, 49, Démodamas de Milet et la reine Apame’, Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 108: 467–72.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. W. (1997) The First Democracies: Early Popular Government outside Athens. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Robinson, , (2011) Democracy beyond Athens: Popular Government in the Greek Classical Age. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. A. (2011) ‘The image of Athens in Diodorus Siculus’, in Schmitz, T. A. and Wiater, N. (eds.), The Struggle for Identity: Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE. Stuttgart, 235–51.Google Scholar
Schuler, C. (1998) Ländliche Siedlungen und Gemeinden im hellenistischen und römischen Kleinasien. Munich.Google Scholar
Seager, R. J., and Tuplin, C. J. (1980) ‘The freedom of the Greeks of Asia: On the origins of a concept and the creation of a slogan’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 100: 141–54.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, S., and Kuhrt, A. (1993) From Samarkhand to Sardis: A New Approach to the Seleucid Empire. London.Google Scholar
Shipley, G. (1993) ‘Distance, development, decline? World-systems analysis and the “Hellenistic” world’, in Bilde, P. et al. (eds.), Centre and Periphery in the Hellenistic World. Aarhus, 271–84.Google Scholar
Shipley, G., and Hansen, M. H. (2006) ‘The polis and federalism’, in Bugh, G. R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Hellenistic World. Cambridge, 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinopoli, C. M. (1994) ‘The Archaeology of Empires’, Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 159–80.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. (2014) ‘The Antiochus Cylinder, Babylonian scholarship and Seleucid imperial ideology’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 134: 66–88.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2006a) ‘Van wetsgetrouwen en afvalligen. Religieus geweld en culturele verandering in de tijd der Makkabeeën’, in Becking, B. and Rouwhorst, G. (eds.), Religies in interactie. Jodendom en Christendom in de Oudheid. Zoetermeer, 79–97.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2006b) ‘“En in woede en razernij doodden zij de afvalligen”. Interactie van Joodse en Griekse cultuur in hellenistisch Palestina’, Leidschrift 21.3: 69–80.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2007) ‘The Hellenistic royal courts: court culture, ceremonial and ideology in Greece, Egypt and the Near East, 336–30 BCE’, PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2008) ‘Seleucid Era’, in Yarshater, E. et al. (eds.), Encyclopaedia Iranica. Online at www.iranica.com; printed edition forthcoming.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2010) ‘Queen of Kings: Cleopatra VII and the Donations of Alexandria’, in Facella, M. and Kaizer, T. (eds.), Kingdoms and Principalities in the Roman Near East. Stuttgart, 139–58.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2011a) ‘Kings and cities in the Hellenistic Age’, in Alston, R., van Nijf, O. and Williamson, C. (eds.), Political Culture in the Greek City after the Classical Age. Leuven, 141–53.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2011b) ‘Hellenistic court society: the Seleukid imperial court under Antiochos the Great, 223–187 BCE’, in Duindam, J., Kunt, M. and Artan, T. (eds.), Royal Courts in Dynastic States and Empires: A Global Perspective. Leiden, 63–89.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2013a) ‘Dynastic courts of the Hellenistic empires’, in Beck, H. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Greek Government. Malden, MA, 38–53.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2013b) ‘Babylonian, Macedonian, king of the world: the Antiochos Cylinder from Borsippa and Seleukid imperial integration’, in Stavrianopoulou, E. (ed.), Shifting Social Imaginaries in the Hellenistic Period: Narrations, Practices, and Images. Leiden, 67–97.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2014a) Courts and Elites in the Hellenistic Empires: The Near East after the Achaemenids, 330–30 BCE. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2014b) ‘Hellenistic imperialism and the idea of world unity’, in Rapp, C. and Drake, H. (eds.), The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge, 38–61.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2014c) ‘“Men to whose rapacity neither sea nor mountain sets a limit”: the aims of the Diadochs’, in Hauben, H. and Meeus, A. (eds.), The Age of the Successors and the Creation of the Hellenistic Kingdoms, 323–276 B.C. Leuven, 307–22.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2014d) ‘The dawning of a Golden Age: images of peace and abundance in Alexandrian court poetry in the context of Ptolemaic imperial ideology’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Hellenistic Poetry in Context: Tenth International Workshop on Hellenistic Poetry, Groningen 25th–27th August 2010. Leuven, 325–41.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2017a) ‘Imperial Persianism: Seleukids, Arsakids, Fratarakā’, in Strootman, R. and Versluys, M. J. (eds.), Persianism in Antiquity. Stuttgart, 169–92.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2017b) ‘Eunuchs, renegades and concubines: the “paradox of power” and the promotion of favorites in the Hellenistic empires’, in Erskine, A., Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Wallace, S. (eds.), The Hellenistic Royal Court. Swansea, 121–42.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2017c) The Birdcage of the Muses: Patronage of the Arts and Sciences at the Ptolemaic Imperial Court, 305–222 BCE. Leuven.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2018) ‘The return of the king: civic feasting and the entanglement of city and empire in Hellenistic Greece’, in Blok, J. H., Strootman, R. and van den Eijnde, F. (eds.), Feasting and Polis Institutions. Leiden, 273–296.Google Scholar
Strootman, R. (2019) ‘Antiochos IV and Rome: the festival at Daphne (Syria), the Treaty of Apameia and the revival of Seleukid expansionism in the West’, in Coşkun, A. and Engels, D. (eds.), Rome and the Seleukid East: Select Papers from Seleukid Study Day V, Brussels, 21–23 August 2015. Brussels, 173–216.Google Scholar
Teegarden, D. A. (2013) Death to Tyrants! Ancient Greek Democracy and the Struggle against Tyranny. Princeton.Google Scholar
Thomsen, A. (2008) ‘Hellenistische Städte in Unteritalien’, in Matthaei, A. and Zimmermann, M. (eds.), Stadtbilder im Hellenismus. Berlin, 380–401.Google Scholar
Thonemann, P. (2013) ‘Alexander, Priene, and Naulochon’, in Martzavou, P. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), Epigraphical Approaches to the Postclassical Polis: Fourth Century BC to Second Century AD. Oxford, 23–36.Google Scholar
Tucci, P. (2003) ‘La democrazia di Polibio tra eredità classica e federalisme’, in Bearzot, C. et al. (eds.), Gli stati territoriali nel mondo antico. Milan, 45–86.Google Scholar
Van der Spek, R. J. (1987) ‘The Babylonian city’, in Kuhrt, A. and Sherwin-White, S. (eds.), Hellenism in the East: The Interaction of Greek and Non-Greek Civilizations From Syria to Central Asia After Alexander. Berkeley, 57–74.Google Scholar
Vanderkam, J. C. (2004) From Joshua to Caiaphas: High Priests after the Exile. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Versluys, M. J. (2015) ‘Roman visual material culture as globalizing koinē’, in Pitts, M. and Versluys, M. J. (eds.), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture. Cambridge, 141–74.Google Scholar
Versluys, M. J. (2016) Visual Style and Constructing Identity in the Hellenistic World: Nemrud Dağ and Commagene under Antiochos I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. (1990) ‘Isis, una quae es omnia: tyrants against tyranny: Isis as a paradigm of Hellenistic rulership’, in Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion I: Ter Unus. Isis, Dionysos, Hermes. Three Studies in Henotheism. Leiden, 39–95.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1976) Le pain et le cirque: sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. (2011) ‘The freedom of the Greeks in the early Hellenistic period: a study in ruler–city relations’, PhD dissertation, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. (2014) ‘Defending the freedom of the Greeks: Antigonos, Telesphoros, and the Olympic Games of 312 B.C.’, Phoenix 68.3–4: 235–46.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1989) ‘Patronage in Roman society: from Republic to Empire’, in Wallace-Hadrill, A. (ed.), Patronage in Ancient Society. London, 63–87.Google Scholar
Weber, G. (1997) ‘Interaktion, Repräsentation und Herrschaft. Der Königshof im Hellenismus’, in Winterling, A. (ed.), Zwischen Haus und Staat. Antike Höfe im Vergleich. Munich, 27–71.Google Scholar
Winterling, A. (2004) ‘“Hof”. Versuch einer idealtypischen Bestimmung anhand der mittelalterlichen und neufrühzeitlichen Geschichte’, in Butz, R., Hirschbiegel, J. and Willoweit, D. (eds.), Hof und Theorie. Cologne, 77–90.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2014) Die Agora von Solunt. Öffentliche Gebäude und öffentliche Räume des Hellenismus im griechischen Westen. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Wörrle, M. (2004) ‘Der Friede zwischen Milet und Magnesia. Methodische Probleme einer Communis opinio’, Chiron 34: 45–57.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. (2005) ‘The icing on the cake: benefactors, economics and public buildings in Roman Asia Minor’, in Mitchell, S. and Katsari, C. (eds.), Patterns in the Economy of Roman Asia Minor. Swansea, 167–86.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. (2008) ‘On the political sociology of the imperial Greek city’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 48: 417–45.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. (2009) The Politics of Munificence in the Roman Empire: Citizens, Elites and Benefactors in Asia Minor. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A. (2014) ‘Controlling urban public space in Roman Asia Minor’, in Bekker-Nielsen, T. (ed.), Space, Place and Identity in Northern Anatolia. Stuttgart, 99–108.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by