Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 151
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
February 2014
Print publication year:
2014
Online ISBN:
9781139600224

Book description

This book presents a history of behavioral economics. The recurring theme is that behavioral economics reflects and contributes to a fundamental reorientation of the epistemological foundations upon which economics had been based since the days of Smith, Ricardo, and Mill. With behavioral economics, the discipline has shifted from grounding its theories in generalized characterizations to building theories from behavioral assumptions directly amenable to empirical validation and refutation. The book proceeds chronologically and takes the reader from von Neumann and Morgenstern's axioms of rational behavior, through the incorporation of rational decision theory in psychology in the 1950s–70s, to the creation and rise of behavioral economics in the 1980s and 1990s at the Sloan and Russell Sage Foundations.

Reviews

'This superb book gives the reader a unique and fascinating window into the historical and intellectual origins of behavioral economics, a movement that is rebuilding economics on a new, more realistic foundation.'

George Loewenstein - Herbert A. Simon Professor of Economics and Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University

'The author provides a balanced treatment of diverging views with a light hand on interpretation … Summing up: highly recommended.'

M. H. Lesser Source: Choice

‘Together, the two narratives make for a richer fabric that can undergird future debates and serve as a basis for much-needed further work on the history, philosophy, and methodology of behavioral economics.’

Erik Angner Source: Journal of the History of Economic Thought

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Non-Published Sources

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation annual reports 1980–2000, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, New York City. Google Scholar
William Baumol Papers, Duke University Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library, Duke University. Google Scholar
William Baumol, e-mail to author, October 18, 2011. Google Scholar
Clyde Coombs Papers, Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan. Google Scholar
Robyn Dawes, interview with the author, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, June 23, 2008. Google Scholar
Gerd Gigerenzer, e-mail to author, July 12, 2008. Google Scholar
Lyle V. Jones, e-mail to author, January 31, 2011. Google Scholar
Daniel Kahneman, interview with the author, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, April 16, 2009. Google Scholar
David Krantz, e-mail to author, August 11, 2008. Google Scholar
David Krantz, interview with the author, Columbia University, New York City, June 20, 2008. Google Scholar
David Krantz, personal archive, Columbia University – not generally accessible. Google Scholar
George Loewenstein, e-mail to author, June 16, 2008. Google Scholar
R. Duncan Luce Papers, Harvard University Archives. Google Scholar
James March, e-mail to the author, 4 April, 2010. Google Scholar
Robert Pachella, interview with the author, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, April 8, 2009. Google Scholar
Psychology Department archives, Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan. Google Scholar
Albert Rees Papers, Duke University Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library, Duke University. Google Scholar
Stephen Richards, e-mail to author, December 4, 2008. Google Scholar
Russell Sage Archives, Rockefeller Foundation Archives, Rockefeller Archive Center, Sleepy Hollow, New York. Google Scholar
Jimmie Savage Papers, Yale University Library. Google Scholar
Timothy Taylor, e-mail to the author, April 6, 2010. Google Scholar
Richard Thaler, e-mail to author, January 14, 2009. Google Scholar
Eric Wanner, interview with the author, Russell Sage Foundation, New York City, April 14, 2009. Google Scholar
Eric Wanner, interview with the author, Russell Sage Foundation, New York City, April 7, 2010. Google Scholar

Published Sources

Allais, M. (1953a). “Fondements d'une Théorie Positive des Choix Comportant un Risque et Critique des Postulats et Axioms de L’Ecole Americaine.” Econometrie XL: 257–332. Google Scholar
Allais, M. (1953b). “Le comportement de l'homme Rationnel devant de le risque: critique des postulats et axioms de l’école americainne.” Econometrica 21: 503–546. Google Scholar
Allais, M. (1953c). “La Psychologie De L’homme Rationnel Devant Le Risque: La Théorie Et L’experience.” Journal de la société statistique de Paris 94: 47–73. Google Scholar
Allais, M. (1979 [1952]). The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School. Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. M. Allais and O. Hagen. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company: 27–148. Google Scholar
Allais, M. and O. Hagen, Eds. (1979). Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. London, D. Reidel Publishing Company. Google Scholar
Allen, R. G. D. (1938). Mathematical Analysis for Economists. London, Macmillan. Google Scholar
Amadae, S. M. (2003). Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy, The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Angner, E. and G. Loewenstein (2012). Behavioral economics. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science Volume 13 Philosophy of Economics. U. Maki. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 641–690. Google Scholar
Archibald, G. C., et al. (1963). “Discussion.” The American Economic Review 53(2): 227–236. Google Scholar
Arrow, K. (1951a). “Alternative Approaches to the Theory of Choice in Risk-Taking Situations.” Econometrica 19: 404–437. Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1951b). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York, Wiley. Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1982). “Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics.” Economic Inquiry 20: 1–9. Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. and F. H. Hahn (1971). General Competitive Analysis. San Francisco, Holden-Day. Google Scholar
Augier, M. and J. G. March, Eds. (2004). Models of a Man: Essays in Memory of Herbert A. Simon. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. (2008). Economics in the United States after 1945. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. L. Blume and S. Durlauf. London, Palgrave: 8: 522–533. Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. (2010). The Puzzle of Modern Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Badger, G. J., et al. (2007). “Altered states: The Impact of Immediate Craving on the Valuation of Current and Future Opioids.” Journal of Health Economics 26: 865–876. Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., et al. (1992). The Adapted Mind, Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Basili, M. and C. Zappia (2010). “Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Ellsberg and Shackle.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 449–474. Google Scholar
Basset, G. W. (1987). “The St. Petersburg Paradox and Bounded Utility.” History of Political Economy 19(4): 517–523. Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1951). “The Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Index – An Ordinalist View.” The Journal of Political Economy 59(1): 61–66. Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1958). “The Cardinal Utility which Is Ordinal.” Economic Journal 68: 665–672. Google Scholar
Ben-Shakar, G., et al. (2007). “Reciprocity and Emotions in Bargaining: Using Physiological and Self-Report Measures.” Journal of Economic Psychology 28(3): 314–323. Google Scholar
Berelson, B. (1968). Behavioral Sciences. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. D. L. Sills and R. K. Merton. New York, Macmillan: 41–45. Google Scholar
Bernoulli, D. (1954 [1738]). “Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk.” Econometrica 22(1): 23–36. Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., et al. (forthcoming). “Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision-Making among the Poor.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. Google Scholar
Blattberg, R. and T. J. Sargent (1971). “Regression with Non-Gaussian Stable Disturbances: Some Sampling Results.” Econometrica 39(3): 501–510. Google Scholar
Blaug, M. (1980). The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Boring, E. C. (1929). A History of Experimental Psychology. New York, The Century Co. Google Scholar
Boumans, M. J. (2005). How Economists Model the World into Numbers. London, Routledge. Google Scholar
Boumans, M. J., Ed. (2007). Measurement in Economics: A Handbook. London, Academic Press. Google Scholar
Bowles, S. (2004). Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The Logic of Modern Physics. Toronto, Macmillan. Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (2001). History of Social Survey. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes. Oxford, Elsevier: 14469–14473. Google Scholar
Burns, A. F. and W. C. Mitchell (1946). Measuring Business Cycles. New York, National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Camerer, C., et al. (1997). “Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 407–441. Google Scholar
Camerer, C., S. Issacharoff, et al. (2003). “Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for ‘Asymmetric Paternalism.’University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151: 1211–1254. Google Scholar
Camerer, C. and G. Loewenstein (2004). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future. Advances in Behavioral Economics. C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein and M. Rabin. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press: 3–52. Google Scholar
Camerer, C., et al. (2005). “Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 43: 9–64. Google Scholar
Campbell, N. R. (1957). Foundations of Science: The Philosophy of Theory and Experiment. New York, Dover Publications. Google Scholar
Capshew, J. H. (1999). Psychologists on the March, Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Cattel, M. (1930). “Psychology in America.” Psychological Review. Ninth International Congress of Psychology, Proceedings and Papers: 12–32. Google Scholar
Chapanis, A., et al. (1949). Applied Experimental Psychology, Human Factors in Engineering Design. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague, Mouton. Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1981). “Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally Demonstrated?The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 317–370. Google Scholar
Cohen-Cole, J. (2007). “Instituting the Science of Mind: Intellectual Economies and Disciplinary Exchange at Harvard's Center for Cognitive Studies.” British Journal for the History of Science 40(4): 567–597. Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. (1983). Psychology and Mathematics: An Essay on Theory. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H., et al. (1970). Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction, CITY, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Coombs, C. H. and S. S. Komorita (1958). “Measuring Utility of Money through Decisions.” American Journal of Psychology 71: 383–389. Google Scholar
Cootner, P. H. (1964). Comments on the Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. The Random Character of Stock Market Prices. P. H. Cootner. London, Risk Books: 413–418. Google Scholar
Cordeschi, R. (2002). The Discovery of the Artificial: Behavior, Mind, and Machines before and beyond Cybernetics. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publications. Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. and J. Tooby (1996). “Are Humans Good Intuitive Statisticians after All? Rethinking Some Conclusions from the Literature on Judgment under Uncertainty.” Cognition 58: 1–73. Google Scholar
Cronqvist, H. and R. Thaler (2004). “Design Choices in Privatized Social-Security Systems: Learning from the Swedish Experience.” American Economic Review, papers and proceedings 94(2): 424–428. Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, H. (2005). Herbert A. Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, H. (2006). “Patrons of the Revolution, Ideals and Institutions in Postwar Behavioral Science.” Isis 97: 420–446. Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza – Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. New York, Harcourt Books. Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the Subject, Historical Origins of Psychological Research. New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the Mind, How Psychology Found its Language. London, Sage. Google Scholar
Daston, L. (1988). Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Daston, L. and P. Galison (2007). Objectivity. New York, Zone Books. Google Scholar
Davis, D. D. and C. A. Holt (1993). Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Davis, J. B. (2003). The Theory of the Individual in Economics. New York, Routledge. Google Scholar
Davis, R. L. (1954). Introduction. Decision Processes. R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davis. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 1–18. Google Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M. and R. Thaler (1985). “Does the Stock Market Overreact?The Journal of Finance 40(3): 793–805. Google Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M. and R. Thaler (1990). “Do Security Analysts Overreact?The American Economic Review 80(2): 52–57. Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1937). “La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjective.” Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7: 1–68. Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1949). “Le vrai et le probable.” Dialectica 3: 78–93. Google Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1951). Recent Suggestions for the Reconciliation of Theories of ProbabilityProceedings of the Second [1950] Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. J. Neyman. Berkeley, University of California Press: 217–226. Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1954). Representation of Preference Ordering by a Numerical Function. Decision Processes. R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davis. New York, Wiley: 159–165. Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1958). “Stochastic Choice and Cardinal Utility.” Econometrica 26: 440–444. Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1959a). “Cardinal Utility for Even-chance Mixtures of Pairs of Sure Prospects.” Review of economic studies 71: 174–177. Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1959b). Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New York, Wiley. Google Scholar
Debreu, G. (1960). Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory. Mathematical Methods in the Social Science, 1959. K. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press: 16–26. Google Scholar
Diamond, P. A. and M. Rothschild, Eds. (1978).Uncertainty in Economics: Readings and ExercisesSan Diego, Academic Press. Google Scholar
Dimand, M. A. and R. W. Dimand, Eds. (1997). The Foundations of Game Theory. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
Dimand, R. W. (2005). Experimental Economic Games: The Early Years. The Experiment in the History of Economics. P. Fontaine and R. Leonard. New York, Routledge: 5–24. Google Scholar
Dodge, R. (1919). “Mental Engineering during the War.” American Review of Reviews 59: 504–508. Google Scholar
Dowie, M. (2001). American Foundations: An Investigative History. Cambrdige. The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Duderstadt, J. D. (1994). “Foreword.” The Making of the University of Michigan 1817–1992. M. L. Steneck and N. H. Steneck. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press: V. Google Scholar
Dunlap, J. W. (1942). “The Psychometric Society – Roots and Powers.” Psychometrika 7(1): 1–8. Google Scholar
Dupuy, J.-P. (2009). On the Origins of Cognitive Science, The Mechanization of the Mind. Cambridge, The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Edwards, W. (1954). “The Theory of Decision Making.” Psychological Bulletin 51: 380–417. Google Scholar
Edwards, W. (1961). “Behavioral Decision Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology(12): 473–498. Google Scholar
Edwards, W. and A. Tversky, Eds. (1967). Decision Making. Penguin Modern Psychology Readings. Baltimore, Penguin Books. Google Scholar
Ellsberg, D. (1961). “Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 75(4): 643–669. Google Scholar
Elster, J. and G. Loewenstein (1992). Utility from Memory and Anticipation. Choice over Time. G. Loewenstein and J. Elster. New York, Russell Sage Foundation: 213–234. Google Scholar
Elzinga, K. G. (1992). “The Eleven Principles of Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 58(4): 861–879. Google Scholar
Erickson, P. (2010). “Mathematical Models, Rational Choice, and the Search for Cold War Culture.” Isis 101(2): 386–392. Google Scholar
Eriksson, L. and A. Hajek (2007). “What Are Degrees of Belief?Studia Logica 86(2): 185–215. Google Scholar
Estes, W. K. (1964). Probability Learning. Categories of Human Learning. A. W. Melton. New York, Academic Press: 89–128. Google Scholar
Fama, E. (1970). “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” The Journal of Finance 25(2): 383–417. Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1964 [1860]). Elemente der Psychophysiek. Amsterdam, Bonset. Google Scholar
Festinger, L. and D. Katz, Eds. (1953). Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences. Fort Worth, Dryden Press. Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1964). Decision and Value Theory. New York, Wiley. Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1981). “Subjective Expected Utility: A Review of Normative Theories.” Theory and Decision 13: 139–199. Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1989). “Retrospective on the Utility Theory of von Neumann and Morgenstern.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2: 127–158. Google Scholar
Flom, M. C., F. W. Weymouth, et al. (1963). “Visual Resolution and Contour Interaction.” Journal of the Optical Society of America 53(9): 1026–1032. Google Scholar
Fontaine, P. and R. Backhouse, Eds. (2010). The Unsocial Social Science? Economics and Neighboring Disciplines since 1945. Durham, NC, and London, Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Forman, P. (1987). “Behind Quantum Electronics: National Security as Basis for Physical Research in the United States, 1940–1960.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 18: 149–229. Google Scholar
Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and Societies, Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, & France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Frantilla, A. (1998). Social Science in the Public Interest: A fiftieth-year history of the Institute of Social Research. Ann Arbor, Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan. Google Scholar
Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, et al. (2002). “Time Discounting and Time Preference A Critical Review.” Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351–401. Google Scholar
Frederiksen, N. and H. Gulliksen, Eds. (1964). Contributions to Mathematical Psychology. London, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar
Friedman, J., Ed. (1996). The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. New Haven, Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1953). The Methodology of Positive Economics. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, Chicago University Press: 3–43. Google Scholar
Friedman, M. and L. Savage (1948). “The Utility Analysis of Choice Involving Risk.” Journal of Political Economy LVI (4): 279–304. Google Scholar
Friedman, M. and L. Savage (1952). “The Expected-utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy LX (6): 463–474. Google Scholar
Friedman, D. and S. Sunder (1994). Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Fryback, D. (2005). “Ward Edwards: Father of Behavioral Decision Theory.” Medical Decision Making 25: 468–470. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1987a). The Probabilistic Revolution in Psychology – an Overview. The Probabilistic Revolution 2. L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer and M. S. Morgan. Cambridge, MIT Press: 7–10. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1987b). Survival of the Fittest Probabilist: Brunswik, Thurstone, and the Two Disciplines of Psychology. The Probabilistic Revolution 2. L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer and M. S. Morgan. Cambridge, MIT Press: 49–72. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). “How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond ‘Heuristics and Biases.’European Review of Social Psychology 2: 83–115. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1993). “From Metaphysics to Psychophysics and Statistics.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(1): 139–140. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). “On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996).” Psychological Review 103(3): 592–596. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and D. J. Murray (1987). Cognition as Intuitive Statistics. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and R. Selten (2001). Bounded Rationality, The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MIT Press. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., P. M. Todd, et al., Eds. (1999). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2000). Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Behavior. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Giocoli, N. (2013). “From Wald to Savage: Homo Economicus becomes a Baysian Statistician.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 49(1): 63–95. Google Scholar
Giraud, Y. (forthcoming). The Political Economy of Textbook Writing: Paul Samuelson and the making of the First Ten Editions of Ecoomics (1945–1976). Google Scholar
Goldstein, W. M. and R. M. Hogarth, Eds. (1997). Research on Judgement and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. D. (1998). “The Patrons of Economic in a Time of Transformation.” History of Political Economy Annual supplement: 53–81. Google Scholar
Green, D. and I. Shapiro (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Thoery: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Green, D. M. and J. A. Swets (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, Wiley. Google Scholar
Grether, D. and C. R. Plott (1979). “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon.” The American Economic Review 69(4): 623–638. Google Scholar
Grether, D. M. and C. R. Plott (1982). “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon: Reply.” American Economic Review 72(3): 575. Google Scholar
Grossman, D. M. (1982). “American Foundations and the Support of Economic Research, 1913–1929.” Minerva 20(1–2): 59–82. Google Scholar
Grunwald, M. (2009). How Obama Is Using the Science of Change. Time. New York. April 2. Google Scholar
Guala, F. (2000). “The Logic of Normative Falsification: Rationality and Experiments in Decision Theory.” Journal of Economic Methodology 7(1): 59–93. Google Scholar
Guala, F. (2005). The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric Methods. New York, McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975). The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. London, New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Hájek, Alan, “Interpretations of Probability,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/probability-interpret/>. Google Scholar
Hands, D. W. (2001). Reflection without Rules, Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Hands, D. W. (2013). Normative Rational Choice Theory: Past, Present, and Future (July 9). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1738671 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1738671. Google Scholar
Hands, D. W. (2010). “Economics, Psychology, and the History of Consumer Choice Theory.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 633–648. Google Scholar
Hands, D. W. and P. Mirowski (1998). Harold Hoteling and the Neoclassical Dream. Economics and Methodology: Crossing Boundaries. R. Backhouse, D. Hausman, U. Mäki and A. Salanti. London, Macmillan: 322–397. Google Scholar
Harris, C. and D. Laibson (2001). “Dynamic Choices of Hyperbolic Consumers.” Econometrica 69(4): 935–957. Google Scholar
Hauptmann, E. (2006). “From Opposition to Accommodation: How Rockefeller Foundation Grants Redefined Relations between Political Theory and Social Science in the 1950s.” American Political Science Review 100(4): 643–649. Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Heidelberger, M. (1993). “Fechner's Impact for Measurement Theory (Comment on Murray, D. J. ‘A Perspective for Viewing the History of Psychophysics’).” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 146–148. Google Scholar
Heidelberger, M. (2004). Nature from Within, Gustav Theodor Fechner and His Psychophysical Worldview. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
Heise, D. R. (1970). The Semantic Differential and Attitude Research. Attitude Measurement. G. F. Summers. Chicago, Rand McNally: 235–253. Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2001). Group Report: What Is the Role of Culture in Bounded Rationality?Bounded Rationality, The Adaptive Toolbox. G. Gigerenzer and R. Selten. Cambridge USA, MIT Press: 343–359. Google Scholar
Henrich, J., et al. (2001). “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies.” The American Economic Review 91(2): 73–78. Google Scholar
Henrich, J., et al. (2004). Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-scale SocietiesOxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Hertwig, R. and G. Gigerenzer (1999). “The ‘Conjunction Fallacy’ Revisited: How Intelligent Inferences Look Like Reasoning Errors.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12: 275–305. Google Scholar
Hertwig, R. and A. Ortmann (2008). “Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in its Defense.” Ethics & Behavior 18(1): 59–92. Google Scholar
Heukelom, F. (2011). “How Validity Travelled to Economic Experimenting.” Journal of Economic Methodology 18(1): 13–28. Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. and R. G. D. Allen (1934a). “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value.” Economica 1(1): 52–76. Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. and R. G. D. Allen (1934b). “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value. Part II. A Mathematical Theory of Individual Demand FunctionsEconomica 1(2): 196–219. Google Scholar
Hogarth, R. M. and M. W. Reder, Eds. (1987). Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Hollinger, D. A. (1989). Academic Culture at Michigan, 1938–1988: The Apotheosis of Pluralism. Intellectual History and Academic Culture at the University of Michigan: Fresh Explorations. M. A. Lourie. Ann Arbor, H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies: 58–101. Google Scholar
Hollinger, D. A. (1995). “Science as a Weapon in Kulturkampfe in the United States during and after World War II.” Isis 86(3): 440–454. Google Scholar
House, J. S., et al., Eds. (2004). A Telescope on Society, Survey Research & Social Science at the University of Michigan & Beyond. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. (1998). Rescuing Prometheus. New York, Pantheon. Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. and A. C. Hughes, Eds. (2000). Systems, Experts, and Computers: teh Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Hunter, W. S. (1946). “Psychology in the War.” American Psychologist 1: 479–492. Google Scholar
Hyman, H. H. (1991). Taking Society's Measure. New York, Russell Sage. Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. and G. Israel (1990). The Invisible Hand. Cambridge, MIT Press. Google Scholar
Jallais, S. and P.-C. Pradier (2005). The Random Character of Stock Market Prices. The Experiment in the History of Economics. P. Fontaine and R. Leonard. New York, Routledge: 25–49. Google Scholar
Jallais, S., P. C. Pradier, and D. Teira et al. (2008). “Facts, Norms and Expected Utility Functions.” History of the Human Sciences 21(2): 45–62. Google Scholar
Jamisona, J., et al. (2008). “To Deceive or Not To Deceive: The Effect of Deception on Behavior in Future Laboratory Experiments.” Jounral of Economic Behavior & Organization 68(3–4): 477–488. Google Scholar
Jones, E. and S. Rahman (2009). “The Maudsley Hospital and the Rockefeller Foundation: The Impact of Philanthropy on Research and Training.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 64(3): 273–299. Google Scholar
Jones, L. V. (1959). “Prediction of Consumer Purchase and the Utility of Money.” Journal of Applied Psychology 43: 334–337. Google Scholar
Jordan, J. M. (1994). Machine-Age Ideology: Social Engineering and American Liberalism, 1911–1939. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina. Google Scholar
Jorland, G. (1987). The Saint Petersburg Paradox 1713–1937. The Probabilistic Revolution 1. L. Kruger, L. J. Daston, and M. Heidelberger. Cambridge, MIT Press: 157–190. Google Scholar
Jovanovic, F. (2008). “The Construction of the Canonical History of Financial Economics.” History of Political Economy 40(2): 213–242. Google Scholar
Juster, F. T. (2004). The Behavioral Study of Economics. A Telescope on Society, Survey Research & Social Science at the University of Michigan & Beyond. J. S. House, F. T. Juster, R. L. Kahn, H. Schuman, and E. Singer. Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press: 119–130. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1963). “The Semantic Differential and the Structure of Inferences among Attributes.” American Journal of Psychology 76: 554–567. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1964). “Temporal Summation in an Acuity Task at Different Energy Levels – a Study of the Determinants of Summation.” Vision Research 4: 557–566. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1965a). “Control of Spurious Association and the Reliability of the Controlled Variable.” Psychological Bulletin 64(5): 326–329. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1965b). “Exposure Duration and Effective Figure-ground Contrast.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17: 308–314. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1966a). “Time-intensity Reciprocity in Acuity as a Function of Luminance and Figure-ground Contrast.” Vision Research 6: 207–215. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1966b). “Time-intensity Reciprocity under Various Conditions of Adaptation and Backward Masking.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 71: 543–549. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1967). Temporal Effects in the Perception of Light and Form. Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Form. W. Wathen-Dunn. Cambridge, M.I.T. Press: 157–170. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewoods Cliffs, CA, Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003). “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” The American Economic Review 93(5): 1449–1475. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and D. Beatty (1966). “Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory.” Science 154: 1583–1585. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and D. Beatty (1967). “Pupillary Responses in a Pitch-discrimination Task.” Perception and Psychophysics 2: 101–105. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., et al. (1967). “Perceptual Deficit during a Mental Task.” Science 157: 218–219. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and E. E. Ghiselli (1962). “Validity and Nonlinear Heteroscedastic Models.” Personnel Psychology 15: 1–12. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., et al. (1990). “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem.” The Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1325–1348. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., et al. (1991). “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 193–206. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and J. Norman (1964). “The Time-intensity Relation in Visual Perception as a Function of Observer's Task.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 68: 215–220. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and W. S. Peavler (1969). “Incentive Effects and Pupillary Changes in Association Learning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 79(2): 312–318. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., et al. (1968). “Effect of Verbalization and Incentive on the Pupil Response to Mental Activity.” Canadian Journal of Psychology 22(3): 186–196. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1972). “Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness.” Cognitive Psychology 3: 430–454. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 313–327. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1996). “On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions.” Psychological Review 103(3): 582–591. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, Eds. (2000). Choices, Values and Frames. New York, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Kalish, G. K., et al. (1954). Some Experimental N-person Games. Decision Processes. R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davis. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 301–327. Google Scholar
Katona, G. (1975). Psychological Economics. Amsterdam, Elsevier. Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1921). Treatise on Probability. London, Macmillan & Co. Google Scholar
Kiddler, L. M. (1981). Research Methods in Social Relations. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
Kitch, E. W. (1977). “The Nature and Function of the Patent System.” Journal of Law and Economics 20(2): 265–290. Google Scholar
Klein, J. L. (forthcoming). Protocols of War. Google Scholar
Kolmogoroff, A. (1933). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin, Julius Springer. Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H., et al. (1971). Foundations of Measurement I. New York, Academic Press. Google Scholar
Krüger, L., et al., Eds. (1987). The Probabilistic Revolution Volume 1: Ideas in History. Cambridge, MIT Press. Google Scholar
Krüger, L., et al., Eds. (1987). The Probabilistic Revolution Volume 2: Ideas in Science. Cambridge, MIT Press. Google Scholar
Laibson, D. (1997). “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 443–477. Google Scholar
Laibson, D. and R. Zeckhauser (1998). “Amos Tversky and the Ascent of Behavioral Economics.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16: 7–47. Google Scholar
Laming, D. (1973). Mathematical Psychology. London, Academic Press. Google Scholar
Lee, K. S. (2004). Rationality, Minds, and Machines in the Laboratory: A Thematic History of Vernon Smith's Experimental Economics. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame. PhD: 300. Google Scholar
Lee, K. S. and P. Mirowski (2008). “The Energy Behind Vernon Smith's Experimental Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 32: 257–271. Google Scholar
Lemov, R. (2005). World as Laboratory, Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men. New York, Hill and Wang. Google Scholar
Lenfant, J.-S. (2012). “Indifference Curves and the Ordinalist Revolution.” History of Political Economy 44(1): 113–155. Google Scholar
Leonard, R. (1991). Essays in the History of Economic Thought: Theory and Institutions in the Mid-Twentieth-Century Economics. Economics. Duke, Duke University. PhD. Google Scholar
Leonard, R. (2010). Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory, From Chess to Social Science, 1900–1960. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Leonard, R. and P. Fontaine (2005). Introduction. The Experiment in the History of Economics. P. Fontaine and R. Leonard. New York, Routledge: 1–4. Google Scholar
Lewin, S. (1996). “Economics and Psychology: Lessons for Our Own Day From the Early Twentieth Century.” Journal of Economic Literature 34(3): 1293–1323. Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, S. and P. Slovic, Eds. (2006). The Construction of Preference. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G. and P. O. Steiner (1972). Economics. 3rd ed. New York, Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G. and P. O. Steiner (1981). Economics. 6th ed. New York, Harper & Row. Google Scholar
oewenstein, G. (1992). The Fall and Rise of Psychological Explanations in the Economics of Intertemporal Choice. Choice over Time. G. Loewenstein and J. Elster. New York, Russell Sage Foundation: 3–34. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (1999a). “Because It Is There: The Challenge of Mountaineering…for Utility Theory.” Kyklos 52: 315–344. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (1999b). “Experimental Economics from the vantage-point of Behavioural Economics.” The Economic Journal 109: F25–F34. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and J. Elster, Eds. (1992). Choice over Time. New York, Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and E. Haisley (2008). The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of “Light” Paternalism. Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations. A. Caplin and A. Schotter. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 210–245. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and D. Prelec (1991). “Negative Time Preference.” The American Economic Review 81(2): 347–352. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and D. Prelec (1992). Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2): 573–597. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and R. Thaler (1989). “Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 181–193. Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., et al. (2001). “Risk as Feelings.” Psychological Bulletin 127: 267–286. Google Scholar
Lopes, L. L. (1991). “The Rhetoric of Irrationality.” Theory and Psychology 1: 65–82. Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., et al., Eds. (1963a). The Handbook of Mathematical Psychology I. New York, John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., et al., Eds. (1963b). The Handbook of Mathematical Psychology II. New York, John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., et al., Eds. (1965). The Handbook of Mathematical Psychology III. New York, John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., et al. (1990). Foundations of Measurement 3. Representation, Axiomatization, and Invariance. San Diego, Academic Press. Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. and H. Raiffa (1957). Games and Decisions, Introduction and Critical Survey. New York, Dover Publications. Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. and J. W. Tukey (1964). “Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1(1): 1–27. Google Scholar
Maas, H. (2005a). “Mill and Jevons on the Private Laboratory of the Mind.” The Manchester School: 620–649. Google Scholar
Maas, H. (2005b). William Stanley Jevons and the Making of Modern Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
MacHale, D. (1985). George Boole: His Life and Work. Dublin, Boole. Google Scholar
Machina, M. J. (1982). “‘Expected Utility’ Analysis without the Independent Axiom.” Econometrica 50(2): 277–323. Google Scholar
Machina, M. J. (1989). “Dynamic Consistency and Non-Expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty.” Journal of Economic Literature 27(1622–1668). Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. A. (2006). An Engine, Not a Camera, How Financial Models Shape Markets. London, MIT Press. Google Scholar
Mäki, U., Ed. (2009). The Methodology of Positive Economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. and R. L. Hudson (2004). The (Mis)behavior of Markets, A Fractal View of Financial Turbulence. New York, Basic Books. Google Scholar
Mandler, M. (1999). Dilemmas in Economic Theory. New York, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Marschak, J. (1946). “Neumann's and Morgenstern's New Approach to Static Economics.” The Journal of Political Economy 44(2): 97–115. Google Scholar
Marschak, J. (1950). “Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility.” Econometrica 18: 111–141. Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., et al. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
McClure, S. M., et al. (2004). “Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards.” Science 306: 503–507. Google Scholar
McConnell, C. R. (1960). Economics, Pirnciples, Porblems, and Policies. New York, McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
McConnell, C. R. (1975). Economics. New York, McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. G. (2005). Fischer Black and the Revolutionary Idea of Finance. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley. Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. G. (2011). The New Lombard Street, How the Fed Became the Dealer of Last Resort. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, E. (1989). “Robert K. Merton: The Celebration and Defense of Science.” Science in Context 3(1): 269–289. Google Scholar
Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in Psychology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Michell, J. (2007). Representational Theory of Measurement. Measurement in Economics: a handbook. M. Boumans. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 19–39. Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1844). On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of Investigation Proper to it. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. J. S. Mill. London, Longmans: 86–118. Google Scholar
Mindell, D. A. (2002). Between Human and Machine: Feedback, Control and Computing before Cybernetics. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (1989). “Tis a Pity Econometrics Isn't an Empirical Endeavor: Mandelbrot, Chaos, and the Noah and Joseph Effects.” Recherche Economiche 43: 76–99. Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (1990). “From Mandelbrot to Chaos in Economic Theory.” Southern Economic Journal 57(2): 289–307. Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine Dreams, Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. and D. W. Hands (1998). A Paradox of Budgets: The Postwar Stabilization of American Neoclassical Demand Theory. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. M. S. Morgan and M. Rutherford. London, Duke University Press: 260–289. Google Scholar
Mongin, P. (2009). Duhemian Themes in Expected Utility Theory. French Studies in the Philosophy of Science. A. Brenner and J. Gayon. Berlin, Springer: 303–357. Google Scholar
Morawski, J. G. (1986). “Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations.” Isis 77: 219–242. Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (1990). The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Morgenstern, O. (1972). “Descriptive, Predictive and Normative Theory.” Kyklos 25(4): 699–714. Google Scholar
Morgenstern, O. (1973). Some Reflections on Utility. Expected Uility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. M. Allais and O. Hagen. London, D. Reidel Publishing Company: 175–183. Google Scholar
Moscati, I. (2007a). “Early Experiments in Consumer Demand Theory: 1930–1970.” History of Political Economy 39(3): 359–401. Google Scholar
Moscati, I. (2007b). “History of Cosumer Demand Theory, 1871–1971: A Neo-Kantian Rational Reconstruction.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 119–156. Google Scholar
Moscati, I. (2010). Were Jevons, Menger and Walras Really Cardinalists? On the Notion of Measurement in Utility Theory, Psychology, Mathematics and other Disciplines, ca. 1870–1910. University of Turin Working Paper Series. Google Scholar
Mosteller, F. and P. Nogee (1951). “An Experimental Measurement of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 50: 371–404. Google Scholar
Mullainathan, S. (2007). Development Economics through the Lens of Psychology. Working Paper, Harvard University. Google Scholar
Murchison, C., Ed. (1929). The Psychological Register. Worecester, MA, Clark University Press. Google Scholar
Nagel, E. (1963). “Assumptions in Economic Theory.” American Economic Review 53(2): 211–219. Google Scholar
National Research Council (1943). Psychology for the Fighting Man: Prepared for the Fighting Man Himself. Washington D.C., Infantry Journal. Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1993). The Nature of Rationality. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. and R. Hertwig (2002). “The Costs of Deception: Evidence from Psychology.” Experimental Economics 5(2): 111–131. Google Scholar
Peckham, H. H. (2005). The Making of the University of Michigan 1917–1992, Edited and Updated by M. L. Steneck and N.H. Steneck. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Phillips, L. D. and D. Von Winterfeldt (2006). Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards to Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. LSEOR. London, LSE. Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S. and D. L. Rubenfield (1995). Microeconomics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Plott, C. R. and V. L. Smith, Eds. (2008). Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Volume 1. Amsterdam, Elsevier. Google Scholar
Poitras, G. and F. Jovanovic, Ed. (2007). Pioneers of Financial Economics, Volume 2: Twentieth-Century Contributions. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
Pooley, J. (forthcoming). A “Not Particularly Felicitous” Phrase: A History of the “Behavioral Sciences” Label. Google Scholar
Pooley, J. and M. Solovey (2010). “Marginal to the Revolution: The Curious Relationship between Economics and the Behavioral Sciences Movement in Mid-Twentieth-Century America.” History of Political Economy 42 (annual supplement): 199–233. Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (1986). The Rise of Statistical Thinking 1820–1900. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Prelec, D. and G. Loewenstein (1997). “Beyond Time Discounting.” Marketing Letters 8(1): 97–108. Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1993). “Incorporating Fairness into Game theory and Economics.” American Economic Review 83(5): 1281–1302. Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1994). “Cognitive Dissonance and Social Change.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23: 177–194. Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1998). “Psychology and Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 11–46. Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. (1931). The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays. London, Routledge. Google Scholar
Raphelson, A. C. (1980). “Psychology at Michigan: The Pillsbury Year, 1987–1947.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16: 301–312. Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1989). The Origins of Violence: Approaches to the Study of Conflict. New York, Paragan House. Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. and A. Tversky (1970). “Choice Behavior in an Optimal Stopping Task.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 5: 105–120. Google Scholar
Roll, R. (1970). The Behavior of Interest Rates. New York, Basic Books. Google Scholar
Roll, R. (1981). “A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect.” The Journal of Finance 36(4): 879–888. Google Scholar
Roll, R. (1983). “The Turn-of-the-Year Effect and the Return Premia of Small Firms.” Journal of Portfolio Management 9: 18–28. Google Scholar
Ross, D. (2003). Changing Contours of the Social Science Disciplines. The Modern Social Sciences. T. Porter and D. Ross. CambridgeCambridge University Press: 7: 205–237. Google Scholar
Ross, D. (2008). “Two Styles of Neuroeconomics.” Economics and Philosophy 24(373–383). Google Scholar
Samuelson, F. (1985). “Organizing for the Kingdom of Behavior: Academic Battles and Organizational Policies in the Twenties.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 21(1): 33–47. Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1950). “Probability and the Attempts to Measure Utility.” The Economic Review 1: 167–173. Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1952). Economics. London, McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1966 [1952]). Utility, Preference and Probability (reprint from French). The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson. J. Stiglitz. Cambridge, MIT Press: 127–136. Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. and W. D. Nordhaus (1985). Economics. New York, McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1951). “The Theory of Statistical Decision.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 46: 55–67. Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1969). “Models of Segregation.” American Economic Review 59(2): 488–493. Google Scholar
Schultz, H. (1928). “Rational Economics.” The American Economic Review 18(4): 643–648. Google Scholar
Schultz, H. (1928). Statistical Laws of Demand and Supply with Special Application to Sugar. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Schultz, H. (1938). The Theory and Measurement of Demand. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Sears, R. R. (1973). “Donald George Marquis: 1908–1973.” American Journal of Psychology 86: 661–663. Google Scholar
Sedlmeier, P. and G. Gigerenzer (1997). “Intuitions about Sample Size: The Empirical Law of Large Numbers.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 10: 33–51. Google Scholar
Sedlmeier, P. and G. Gigerenzer (2000). “Was Bernoulli Wrong? On Intuitions about Sample Size.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 133–139. Google Scholar
Selcer, P. (2009). “The View From Everywhere: Disciplining Diversity in Post-World War II International Social Science.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45(4): 309–329. Google Scholar
Senn, P. R. (1966). “‘What Is “Behavioral Science?’ – Notes toward a History.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 2(2): 107–122. Google Scholar
Sent, E.-M. (1998). The Evolving Rationality of Rational Expectations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Sent, E.-M. (2001). “Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32(3): 479–500. Google Scholar
Sent, E.-M. (2004). “Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made its (Limited) Way Back into Economics.” History of Political Economy 36(4): 735–760. Google Scholar
Sent, E.-M. (2005). “Simplifying Herbert Simon.” History of Political Economy 37(2): 227–232. Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. (1949). Expectations in Economics. New York, Wiley. Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. (1961). Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Shefrin, H. M. and R. Thaler (1988). “The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis.” Economic Inquiry 26(609–641). Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. (1979). “The Volatility of Long-Term Interest Rates and Expectations Models of the Term Structure.” Journal of Political Economy 87: 1190–1219. Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. (1981). “Do Stock Prices Move too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?American Economic Review 71(3): 421–436. Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. (1989). Market Volatility. Cambridge, The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient Markets, an Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man, Social and Rational – Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1959). “Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Sciences.” American Economic Review 49(1): 253–283. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1962). “New Developments in the Theory of the Firm.” American Economic Review 52(3): 1–15. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1963). Economics and PsychologyPsychology: A Study of a Science. S. Koch. New York, McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1978). “Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought.” The American Economic Review 68(2, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninetieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association): 1–16. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1986). “Interview: The Failure of Armchair Economics.” Challenger November–December: 18–25. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1987). Behavioural Economics. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and O. Newman. London, Macmillan:221–224. Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. (2003). John Maynard Keynes, 1883–1946: Economist, Philosopher, Statesman. London, Macmillan. Google Scholar
Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein (1971). “Reversal of Preferences Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55. Google Scholar
Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein (1973). “Response-Induced Reversals of Preferences in Gambling: An Extended Replication in Las Vegas.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 101: 16–20. Google Scholar
Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein (1983). “Preference reversals: A broader perspective.” American Economic Review 73(4): 596–605. Google Scholar
Slovic, P. and A. Tversky (1974). “Who Accepts Savage's Axiom?Behavioral Science 19(6): 368–373. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1959). “The Theory of Investment and Production.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 73(1): 61–87. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1960). “Problems in Production-Investment Planning over Time.” International Economic Review 1(3): 198–216. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1962). “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior.” The Journal of Political Economy 70(2): 111–137. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1965). “Experimental Auction Markets and the Walrasian Hypothesis.” The Journal of Political Economy 73(4): 387–393. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1967). “Experimental Studies of Discrimination Versus Competition in Sealed-Bid Auction Markets.” The Journal of Business 40(1): 56–84. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1968). “Economics of Production from Natural Resources.” The American Economic Review 58(3): 409–431. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1969). “Measuring Nonmonetary Utilities in Uncertain Choices: The Ellsberg Urn.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 83(2): 324–329. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1974). “Economic Theory and Its Discontents.” The American Economic Review 64(2): 320–322. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1982). “Markets as Economizers of Information: Experimental Examination of the ‘Hayek Hypothesis.’Economic Inquiry 2: 165–179. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1989). “Theory, Experiment and Economics.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(1): 151–169. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1994). “Economics in the Laboratory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1): 113–131. Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (2008). Rationality in Economics, Constructivist and Ecological Forms. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Stapleford, T. A. (2011). Positive Economics for Democratic Policy: Friedman, Institutionalism, and the Science of History. Building Chicago Economics: New Perspectives on the History of America's Most Powerful Economics Program. R. van Horn, P. Mirowski and T. A. Stapleford, Cambridge University Press: 3–35. Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1939). “Psychology and the Science of Science.” Psychological Bulletin 36(4): 221–263. Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S., Ed. (1951). Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, Measurement, and Psychophysics. Handbook of Experimental Psychology. S. S. Stevens. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 1–50. Google Scholar
Stigler, G. (1988). Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. New York, Basic Books. Google Scholar
Summers, L. H. (1986). “Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values?The Journal of Finance 41(3): 591–601. Google Scholar
Suppes, P., et al. (1989). Foundations of Measurement 2. Geometrical, treshold and probabilistic representations. San Diego, Academic Press. Google Scholar
Teira, D. (2006). “On the Normative Dimension of the St. Petersburg Paradox.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 210–223. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. (1985). “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice.” Marketing Science 4(3): 199–214. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. (1987). The Psychology of Choice and the Assumptions of Economics. Laboratory Experiments in Economics: Six Points of View. A. Roth. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 99–130. Google Scholar
Thaler, R., Ed. (1992). The Winners Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. New York, Free Press. Google Scholar
Thaler, R., Ed. (1993). Advances in Behavioral Finance. New York, Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
Thaler, R., Ed. (2005). Advances in Behavioral Finance. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1980). “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1991). Quasi Rational Economics. New York, Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (2000). “From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(1): 133–141. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and S. Benartzi (2004). “Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving.” Journal of Political Economy 112: S164–187. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and C. R. Sunstein (2003). “Libertarian Paternalism.” The American Economic Review 93(2): 175–179. Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and C. R. Sunstein (2008). Nudge, Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Thomas, W. (2007). “The Heuristics of War: Scientific Method and the Founders of Operations Research.” British Journal for the History of Science 40(2): 251–274. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1927a). “Psychophysical Analysis.” American Journal of Psychology 38: 368–389. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1927b). “A Law of Comparative Judgment.” Psychological Review 34: 273–286. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1927c). “A Mental Unit of Measurement.” Psychological Review 34: 415–423. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). “The Indifference Function.” Journal of Social Psychology 2(2): 139–167. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple-factor Analysis: A Development and Expansion of the Vectors of Mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1959). The Measurement of Values. Chicago, University of Chicago. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. and E. J. Chave (1929). The Measurement of Attitude, a Psychophysical Method and Some Experiments with a Scale for Measuring Attitude toward the Church. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. and L. V. Jones (1957). “The Rational Origin for Measuring Subjective Values.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 52: 458–471. Google Scholar
Todd, P. M., et al. (2011). Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1967a). “Additivity, Utility and Subjective Probability.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4: 175–202. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1967b). “A General Theory of Polynomial Conjoint Measurement.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4: 1–20. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1967c). “Utility Theory and Additivity Analysis of Risky Choices.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 75(1): 27–36. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1969). “The Intransitivity of Preferences.” Psychological Review 76: 31–48. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1971). Elimination by Aspects: A Probabilistic Theory of Choice. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan. Department of psychology. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1972). “Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice.” Psychological Review 79: 218–299. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. (1991). Introduction. Frontiers of Mathematical Psychology, Essays in Honor of Clyde Coombs. D. R. Brown and J. E. K. Smith. New York, Springer-Verlag: xiii–xxvi. Google Scholar
Tverksy, A. and W. Edwards (1966). “Information versus reward in binary choices.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(5): 680–683. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1971). “Belief in the Law of Small Numbers.” Psychological Bulletin 76: 105–110. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1974). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124–1131. Google Scholar
Tversky, T. and D. Kahneman (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211: 453–458. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1992). “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323. Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and D. H. Krantz (1970). “The Dimensional Representation and the Metric Structure of Similarity Data.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 7: 572–596. Google Scholar
van Winden, F. (2007). “Affect and Fairness in Economics.” Social Justice Research 20(1): 32–52. Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1988). The Mathematician. The World of Mathematics: A Small Library of the Literature of Mathematics from A’h-mosé the Scribe to Albert Einstein. J. R. Newman. New York, Simon and Schluster: 2029–2039. Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern (2004 [1944]). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
von Plato, J. (1994). Creating Modern Probability. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Vromen, J. (2007). “Neuroeconomics as a Natural Extension of Bioeconomics: The Shifting Scope of Standard Economic Theory.” Journal of Bioeconomics 9(145–167). Google Scholar
Wald, A. (1950). Statistical Decision Functions. New York, Wiley. Google Scholar
Wallis, W. A. and M. Friedman (1942). The Empirical Derivation of Indifference Functions. Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics, In Memory of Henry Schultz. O. Lange, F. McIntyre, and T. O. Yntema. New York, Books for Libraries Press: 175–189. Google Scholar
Wanner, E. (1973). “Do We Understand Sentences from the Outside-in or from the Inside-out.” Daedalus 102((3) Language as a Human Problem): 163–183. Google Scholar
Wanner, E., et al. (1975). Garden Paths in Relative Clauses. S.L., S.N. Google Scholar
Wanner, E. and S. Shiner (1976). “Measuring Transient Memory Load.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15: 159–167. Google Scholar
Weaver, W. (1967). U.S. Philanthropic Foundations: Their History, Structure, Management, and Record. New York, Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. (1991). Stabilizing Dynamics, Constructing Economic Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R., Ed. (1992). Toward a History of Game Theory. London, Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. and P. Mirowski (1994). “The Pure and the Applied: Bourbakism Comes to Mathematical Economics.” Science in Context 7(2): 245–272. Google Scholar
Wong, S. (1978). The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preferences Theory, a Study by the Method of Rational Reconstruction. London, Routledge. Google Scholar
Wright, P. and D. Kahneman (1971). “Evidence for Alternative Strategies of Sentence Retention.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 23: 197–213. Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. M. (1941). “Psychology and Defense.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 84: 527–542. Google Scholar
Zappia, C. (2008). “Non-Bayesian Decision Theory Ante Litteram: The Case of G.L.S. Shackle.” Depeid Working Papers 4/2008. Google Scholar

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 508
Total number of PDF views: 8371 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 10749 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 9th April 2025. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.