Book contents
- A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition
- Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law
- A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Frontispiece
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Biggest Legal Mind We Have
- 3 Young Dicey in Oxford
- 4 Dicey the Common Lawyer
- 5 Dicey and the Art and Science of Law
- 6 Lectures Introductory to the Law of the Constitution
- 7 Dicey’s Legal Constitution
- 8 The Law of Parliamentary Sovereignty
- 9 The Supremacy of Ordinary Law
- 10 Sovereignty and the Spirit of Legality
- 11 Dicey’s Administrative Law Blind Spot
- 12 Towards a Discursive Legalism
- 13 The Constitution in the Common Law Tradition
- Appendix Was Dicey Diceyan?
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2021
Book contents
- A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition
- Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law
- A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional Tradition
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Frontispiece
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Biggest Legal Mind We Have
- 3 Young Dicey in Oxford
- 4 Dicey the Common Lawyer
- 5 Dicey and the Art and Science of Law
- 6 Lectures Introductory to the Law of the Constitution
- 7 Dicey’s Legal Constitution
- 8 The Law of Parliamentary Sovereignty
- 9 The Supremacy of Ordinary Law
- 10 Sovereignty and the Spirit of Legality
- 11 Dicey’s Administrative Law Blind Spot
- 12 Towards a Discursive Legalism
- 13 The Constitution in the Common Law Tradition
- Appendix Was Dicey Diceyan?
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A.V. Dicey and the Common Law Constitutional TraditionA Legal Turn of Mind, pp. 405 - 442Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
‘Alexis de Tocqueville’ (Aug. 1893) 21:126 National Review 771‒784.Google Scholar
‘Appeal to the Nation’ (May 1914) 75 Nineteenth Century and After 945‒957.Google Scholar
‘Autobiographical Sketch’. In Rait, Robert S., ed. Memorials of Albert Venn Dicey, Being Chiefly Letters and Diaries. London: Macmillan & Co., 1925, 1‒15.Google Scholar
‘Bagehot’s Physics and Politics’ (4 Mar. 1873) 16:405 The Nation 238‒240 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Balance of Classes’. In Essays on Reform. London: Macmillan & Co., 1867, 67‒84.Google Scholar
‘Blackstone’ (7 Oct. 1897) 65 The Nation 274‒276 (pt. I); (14 Oct. 1897) 295‒296 (pt. II).Google Scholar
‘Blackstone’s Commentaries’ (Dec. 1909) 65 The National Review 653‒675, reprinted (1932) 4 Cambridge Law Journal 286‒307.Google Scholar
‘Burke on Bolshevism’ (Aug. 1918) 84 Nineteenth Century and After 274‒287.Google Scholar
‘Can the English Constitution Be Americanized?’ (28 Jan. 1886) 42 The Nation 73‒74.Google Scholar
‘Cant and Constitutionalism’ (18 Jan. 1883) 36:916 The Nation 54‒56.Google Scholar
‘Chetti v. Chetti’ (1909) 25 Law Quarterly Review 202‒205.Google Scholar
‘The College as It Is Now’. In Davies, J. Llewelyn, ed. The Working Men’s College, 1854‒1904. London: Macmillan & Co., 1904, 236‒254.Google Scholar
‘The Combination Laws. I. ‒ Introductory’ (Dec. 1903) 8:133 Working Men’s College Journal 212‒217.Google Scholar
‘A Common Citizenship for the English Race’ (Jan.–June 1897) 71 Contemporary Review 457‒476.Google Scholar
‘The Conscientious Objector’ (Feb. 1918) 83:492 The Nineteenth Century and After 357‒373.Google Scholar
‘Constitutional Revision’ (1895) 11 Law Quarterly Review 387‒392.Google Scholar
‘The Criteria of Jurisdiction’ (1892) 8 Law Quarterly Review 21‒39.Google Scholar
‘Democratic Assumptions’ (20 Nov. 1890) 51:1325 The Nation 397‒399 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Development of Administrative Law in England’ (1915) 31 Law Quarterly Review 148‒153.Google Scholar
‘The Development of the Common Law’ (May‒Oct. 1871) 24 Macmillan’s Magazine 287‒296.Google Scholar
‘Digby on History of English Law’ (9 Dec. 1875) 21 The Nation 373‒374 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Droit Administratif in Modern French Law’ (1901) 17 Law Quarterly Review 302‒318.Google Scholar
‘Earl Russell’s Recollections and Suggestions’ (6 May 1875) 20:514 The Nation 317‒318 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘England in 1848’ (Oct. 1920) 234 Quarterly Review 221‒242.Google Scholar
‘England and America’ (Oct. 1898), 82 Atlantic Monthly 441‒445.Google Scholar
‘The English Constitution from 1760 to 1860’ (13 Apr. 1882) 34:876 The Nation 318‒319 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘An English View of American Conservatism’ (25 Mar. 1880) 30:769 The Nation 228‒230.Google Scholar
‘The Extension of Law Teaching at Oxford’ (1910‒1911) 24 Harvard Law Review 1‒5.Google Scholar
‘Federal Government’ (1885) 1 Law Quarterly Review 80‒99.Google Scholar
‘Freeman’s Growth of the English Constitution’ (9 Dec. 1872) 15:376 The Nation 169‒170 (Part I); (19 Dec. 1872) 15:377 The Nation 188‒191 (Part II) [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Garibaldi and the Movement of 1848’ (June 1882) 34 The Nation 540‒542.Google Scholar
‘Gneist’s History of the English Constitution’ (24 June 1886) 42:1095 The Nation 531‒532 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘His Book and His Character’. In Memories of John Westlake. London: Smith, Elder, 1914, 17‒42.Google Scholar
‘History’ (Mar. 1990) 6:94 Working Men’s College Journal 193‒198.Google Scholar
‘Home Rule from an English Point of View’ (July 1882) 42 Contemporary Review 66‒86.Google Scholar
‘How Is the Law to Be Enforced in Ireland?’ (Nov. 1881) 30:179 Fortnightly Review 537‒552.Google Scholar
‘The Influence of John Bright’ (12 Oct. 1882) 35 The Nation 305‒306.Google Scholar
‘Introduction’. In Emile Boutmy, Studies in Constitutional Law France ‒ England ‒ United States. E. M. Dicey, trans. London: Macmillan & Co., 1891.Google Scholar
‘Introduction’. In The Legal Sufferings of the Jews in Russia. Wolf, Lucien, ed. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1912, i‒x.Google Scholar
‘Introduction’. In Wordsworth’s Tract on the Convention of Cintra. London: Humphrey Milford, 1915, vii‒xl.Google Scholar
‘An Introduction to Jurisprudence’ (24 Sept. 1896) 63 The Nation 234‒235.Google Scholar
‘Is It Wise to Establish Home Rule before the End of the War?’ (July 1917) 82 The Nineteenth Century and After 1‒25.Google Scholar
‘John Stuart Mill’ (11 May 1882) 34:880 The Nation 403‒404 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Judicial Policy’ (Apr. 1874) 29 Macmillan’s Magazine 473‒487.Google Scholar
‘Law-Teaching, Oral and Written’. In A Memoir of the Right Honourable Sir William Anson. Henson, Herbert Hensley, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1920, 84‒101.Google Scholar
‘The Legal Boundaries of Liberty’ (1 Jan. 1868) 3:13 Fortnightly Review 1‒13.Google Scholar
‘Legal Education’ (Nov. 1871–Apr. 1872) 25 Macmillan’s Magazine 115‒127.Google Scholar
‘Legal Etiquette’ (Aug. 1867) 2:8 Fortnightly Review 169‒179.Google Scholar
‘Leslie Stephen’s Science of Ethics’ (26 Apr. 1883) 36:930 The Nation 364‒366 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Lord Pembroke’ (Jan. 1897) 28:167 National Review 616‒629.Google Scholar
‘Louis Napoleon: 1852 and 1873’ (Feb. 1873) 13:74 Fortnightly Review 197‒204.Google Scholar
‘Maine’s Early History of Institutions’ (1 Apr. 1875) 20:509 The Nation 225‒226 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Maine’s Early Law and Custom ‒ I’ (23 Aug. 1883) 37:947 The Nation 165‒166.Google Scholar
‘Mill “On Liberty”’ (Feb. 1901) 7:103 Working Men’s College Journal 17‒21.Google Scholar
‘Mill’s Autobiography’ (15 Jan. 1874) 18:446 The Nation 43‒44 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Modern English Law’ (2 Nov. 1876) 23:592 The Nation 273‒274 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Mr. Bryce on the Relation between Whites and Blacks’ (10 July 1902) 75 Nation 26‒28.Google Scholar
‘New Jacobinism and Old Morality’ (Jan.–June 1888) 53 Contemporary Review 475‒502.Google Scholar
‘Novel Reading’ (Nov. 1903) 8:132 Working Men’s College Journal 201.Google Scholar
‘On Private International Law as a Branch of the Law of England’ (1890) 6 Law Quarterly Review 1‒21.Google Scholar
‘Ought the Referendum to Be Introduced into England?’ (Jan.‒June 1890) 57 Contemporary Review 489‒511.Google Scholar
‘A Political Forecast’ (3 Aug. 1882) 35 Nation 89‒90.Google Scholar
‘The Political Outlook in England’ (20 Apr. 1882) 34:877 The Nation 332‒334.Google Scholar
‘Préface de l’édition française’. In Dicey, A. V., Introduction à l’étude du droit constitutionnel. Batut, A. and Jèze, G., trans. Paris: Giard et Brière, 1902, xxix‒xxxii.Google Scholar
‘The Prevalence of Lawlessness in England’ (8 Feb. 1883) 37:944 The Nation 95‒96.Google Scholar
‘The Protest of Irish Protestantism’ (July 1892) 62 Contemporary Review 1‒15.Google Scholar
‘The Referendum’ (Mar. 1894) 23 National Review 65‒72.Google Scholar
‘The Referendum and Its Critics’ (Apr. 1910) 212 Quarterly Review 538‒562.Google Scholar
‘The Reform Act of 1832 and Its Critics’ (Jan. 1883) 33:193 Fortnightly Review 116‒131.Google Scholar
‘The Republic and Christianity’ (Dec. 1857) 1 Undergraduate Papers 16‒19.Google Scholar
Review of The American Commonwealth by Bryce, James (Apr. 1889) 169437 Edinburgh Review 481‒518.Google Scholar
Review of The Common Law by Holmes, O. W. Jr (3 June 1882) The Spectator, Literary Supplement 745‒747 [unsigned].Google Scholar
Review of The Law of Legislative Power in Canada by Lefroy, A. H. F. (1898) 14 Law Quarterly Review 198‒200.Google Scholar
‘Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics – I’ (9 Mar. 1876) 22:558 The Nation 162‒163; ‘Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics – II’ (16 Mar. 1876) 22:558 The Nation 180‒181 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Social Movement in England. – I’. (10 Jan. 1884) 38 The Nation 29‒30; ‘The Social Movement in England. – II’. (17 Jan. 1884) 38 The Nation 49‒51; ‘The Social Movement in England. – III’. (27 Mar. 1884) 38 The Nation 272‒273; ‘The Social Movement in England. – IV’. (17 Apr. 1884) 38 The Nation 337‒338.Google Scholar
‘Some Aspects of Democracy in England’ (July‒Dec. 1883) 137 North American Review 317‒326.Google Scholar
‘Signs of the Times in England’ (11 May 1882) 34 The Nation 395‒397.Google Scholar
‘Sir Alexander Cockburn’ (May 1881) 10 The International Review 397‒410.Google Scholar
‘Sir George Bramwell and the English Bench’ (15 Dec. 1881) 33:859 The Nation 468‒470.Google Scholar
‘Sir Leslie Stephen, K.C.B.’ (17 July 1902) 75:1933 The Nation 49‒50 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Special Correspondence: July 14, 1789–July 14, 1880’ (12 Aug. 1880) 31:789 The Nation 109‒110.Google Scholar
‘Stephen’s History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century’ (30 Aug. 1977) 25:635 The Nation 138‒140 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Stephen’s “Hours in a Library”’(31 Dec. 1874) 19:496 The Nation 440‒443 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Strength and the Weakness of the Third French Republic’ (July 1910) 68:401 The Nineteenth Century and After 205‒219.Google Scholar
‘Stubbs’s Constitutional History of England’ (4 Mar. 1875) 20:505 The Nation 152‒154 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Study of Jurisprudence’ (1879‒1880) 5 Law Magazine & Review 382‒401.Google Scholar
‘Suggestions on Academical Organisation’ (Oct. 1869) 80: 478 Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 407‒430.Google Scholar
‘Thomas Edward Dicey (Proprietor of the “Mercury” for 50 Years)’. In Hadley, W. W., The Bi-Centenary Record of the Northampton Mercury, 1720‒1920. Northampton: The Mercury Press, 1920, 49‒54.Google Scholar
‘Thoughts on the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland under the Constitution of 1690 (1690‒1707)’ (Apr. 1917) 14 Scottish Historical Review 197‒215.Google Scholar
‘The United States and the Swiss Confederation’ (8 Oct. 1885) 41 The Nation 297‒298.Google Scholar
‘Unjust and Impolitic Provincial Legislation and Its Disallowance by the Governor-General’ (1909) 45 Canada Law Journal 457‒462.Google Scholar
‘Walter Bagehot’ (26 June 1879) 28:730 The Nation 436‒437 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Weak Side of the Historical Method’ (12 Apr. 1877) 24:615 The Nation 217‒218 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘What Is the State of English Opinion about Ireland?’ (2 Feb. 1882) 34 The Nation 95‒97.Google Scholar
‘Why Do People Hate Mr. Gladstone?’ (14 Sept. 1882) 35:898 The Nation 218‒220.Google Scholar
‘Why Englishmen Are Not Alarmed at the Political Crisis’ (14 Jan. 1886) 42 The Nation 340‒341.Google Scholar
‘Woman Suffrage’ (Jan. 1909) 210 Quarterly Review 276‒304.Google Scholar
‘Wordsworth and the War’ (May 1918) 77 The Nineteenth Century and After 1041‒1060.Google Scholar
Introduction à l’étude du droit constitutionnel. A. Batut and G. Jèze, trans.; preface by A. Ribot. Paris: Giard et Brière, 1902.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 4th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1893.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 5th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1897.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 6th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1902.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1908.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1915.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 9th ed. Wade, E. C. S., ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1939.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed. Wade, E. C. S., ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1959.Google Scholar
Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: Macmillan & Co., 1885.Google Scholar
Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1886.Google Scholar
The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume One: Law of the Constitution. Allison, J. W. F., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 [republication of the 1885 edition].Google Scholar
Can English Law Be Taught at the Universities? An Inaugural Lecture, Delivered at All Souls College, 21st April 1883. London: Macmillan & Co., 1883.Google Scholar
A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws. London: Steven & Sons, 1897.Google Scholar
A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Dicey, A. V. and Keith, A. Berriedale, eds. London: Stevens & Son; Sweet & Maxwell, 1922.Google Scholar
England’s Case against Home Rule. London: John Murray, 1886.Google Scholar
A Fool’s Paradise: Being a Constitutionalist’s Criticism on the Home Rule Bill of 1912. London: John Murray, 1913.Google Scholar
The Law of Domicil as a Branch of the Law of England, Stated in the Form of Rules. London: Stevens & Sons, 1879.Google Scholar
A Leap in the Dark, or Our New Constitution. London: John Murray, 1893.Google Scholar
Lectures on Comparative Constitutionalism: The Oxford Edition of Dicey, volume 2. Allison, J. W. F., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. London: Macmillan & Co., 1905; 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1914.Google Scholar
Letters to a Friend on Votes for Women. London: John Murray, 1909.Google Scholar
The Privy Council: The Arnold Prize Essay, 1860. Oxford: T. & G. Shrimpton, 1860; 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1887.Google Scholar
The Statesmanship of Wordsworth: An Essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1917.Google Scholar
(with Rait, R. S.). Thoughts on the Union between England & Scotland. London: Macmillan & Co., 1920.Google Scholar
A Treatise on the Rules for the Selection of the Parties to an Action. London: William Maxwell & Son, 1870.Google Scholar
The Verdict: A Tract on the Political Significance of the Report of the Parnell Commission. London: Cassell & Co., 1890.Google Scholar
‘Alexis de Tocqueville’ (Aug. 1893) 21:126 National Review 771‒784.Google Scholar
‘Appeal to the Nation’ (May 1914) 75 Nineteenth Century and After 945‒957.Google Scholar
‘Autobiographical Sketch’. In Rait, Robert S., ed. Memorials of Albert Venn Dicey, Being Chiefly Letters and Diaries. London: Macmillan & Co., 1925, 1‒15.Google Scholar
‘Bagehot’s Physics and Politics’ (4 Mar. 1873) 16:405 The Nation 238‒240 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Balance of Classes’. In Essays on Reform. London: Macmillan & Co., 1867, 67‒84.Google Scholar
‘Blackstone’ (7 Oct. 1897) 65 The Nation 274‒276 (pt. I); (14 Oct. 1897) 295‒296 (pt. II).Google Scholar
‘Blackstone’s Commentaries’ (Dec. 1909) 65 The National Review 653‒675, reprinted (1932) 4 Cambridge Law Journal 286‒307.Google Scholar
‘Burke on Bolshevism’ (Aug. 1918) 84 Nineteenth Century and After 274‒287.Google Scholar
‘Can the English Constitution Be Americanized?’ (28 Jan. 1886) 42 The Nation 73‒74.Google Scholar
‘Cant and Constitutionalism’ (18 Jan. 1883) 36:916 The Nation 54‒56.Google Scholar
‘Chetti v. Chetti’ (1909) 25 Law Quarterly Review 202‒205.Google Scholar
‘The College as It Is Now’. In Davies, J. Llewelyn, ed. The Working Men’s College, 1854‒1904. London: Macmillan & Co., 1904, 236‒254.Google Scholar
‘The Combination Laws. I. ‒ Introductory’ (Dec. 1903) 8:133 Working Men’s College Journal 212‒217.Google Scholar
‘A Common Citizenship for the English Race’ (Jan.–June 1897) 71 Contemporary Review 457‒476.Google Scholar
‘The Conscientious Objector’ (Feb. 1918) 83:492 The Nineteenth Century and After 357‒373.Google Scholar
‘Constitutional Revision’ (1895) 11 Law Quarterly Review 387‒392.Google Scholar
‘The Criteria of Jurisdiction’ (1892) 8 Law Quarterly Review 21‒39.Google Scholar
‘Democratic Assumptions’ (20 Nov. 1890) 51:1325 The Nation 397‒399 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Development of Administrative Law in England’ (1915) 31 Law Quarterly Review 148‒153.Google Scholar
‘The Development of the Common Law’ (May‒Oct. 1871) 24 Macmillan’s Magazine 287‒296.Google Scholar
‘Digby on History of English Law’ (9 Dec. 1875) 21 The Nation 373‒374 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Droit Administratif in Modern French Law’ (1901) 17 Law Quarterly Review 302‒318.Google Scholar
‘Earl Russell’s Recollections and Suggestions’ (6 May 1875) 20:514 The Nation 317‒318 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘England in 1848’ (Oct. 1920) 234 Quarterly Review 221‒242.Google Scholar
‘England and America’ (Oct. 1898), 82 Atlantic Monthly 441‒445.Google Scholar
‘The English Constitution from 1760 to 1860’ (13 Apr. 1882) 34:876 The Nation 318‒319 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘An English View of American Conservatism’ (25 Mar. 1880) 30:769 The Nation 228‒230.Google Scholar
‘The Extension of Law Teaching at Oxford’ (1910‒1911) 24 Harvard Law Review 1‒5.Google Scholar
‘Federal Government’ (1885) 1 Law Quarterly Review 80‒99.Google Scholar
‘Freeman’s Growth of the English Constitution’ (9 Dec. 1872) 15:376 The Nation 169‒170 (Part I); (19 Dec. 1872) 15:377 The Nation 188‒191 (Part II) [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Garibaldi and the Movement of 1848’ (June 1882) 34 The Nation 540‒542.Google Scholar
‘Gneist’s History of the English Constitution’ (24 June 1886) 42:1095 The Nation 531‒532 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘His Book and His Character’. In Memories of John Westlake. London: Smith, Elder, 1914, 17‒42.Google Scholar
‘History’ (Mar. 1990) 6:94 Working Men’s College Journal 193‒198.Google Scholar
‘Home Rule from an English Point of View’ (July 1882) 42 Contemporary Review 66‒86.Google Scholar
‘How Is the Law to Be Enforced in Ireland?’ (Nov. 1881) 30:179 Fortnightly Review 537‒552.Google Scholar
‘The Influence of John Bright’ (12 Oct. 1882) 35 The Nation 305‒306.Google Scholar
‘Introduction’. In Emile Boutmy, Studies in Constitutional Law France ‒ England ‒ United States. E. M. Dicey, trans. London: Macmillan & Co., 1891.Google Scholar
‘Introduction’. In The Legal Sufferings of the Jews in Russia. Wolf, Lucien, ed. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1912, i‒x.Google Scholar
‘Introduction’. In Wordsworth’s Tract on the Convention of Cintra. London: Humphrey Milford, 1915, vii‒xl.Google Scholar
‘An Introduction to Jurisprudence’ (24 Sept. 1896) 63 The Nation 234‒235.Google Scholar
‘Is It Wise to Establish Home Rule before the End of the War?’ (July 1917) 82 The Nineteenth Century and After 1‒25.Google Scholar
‘John Stuart Mill’ (11 May 1882) 34:880 The Nation 403‒404 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Judicial Policy’ (Apr. 1874) 29 Macmillan’s Magazine 473‒487.Google Scholar
‘Law-Teaching, Oral and Written’. In A Memoir of the Right Honourable Sir William Anson. Henson, Herbert Hensley, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1920, 84‒101.Google Scholar
‘The Legal Boundaries of Liberty’ (1 Jan. 1868) 3:13 Fortnightly Review 1‒13.Google Scholar
‘Legal Education’ (Nov. 1871–Apr. 1872) 25 Macmillan’s Magazine 115‒127.Google Scholar
‘Legal Etiquette’ (Aug. 1867) 2:8 Fortnightly Review 169‒179.Google Scholar
‘Leslie Stephen’s Science of Ethics’ (26 Apr. 1883) 36:930 The Nation 364‒366 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Lord Pembroke’ (Jan. 1897) 28:167 National Review 616‒629.Google Scholar
‘Louis Napoleon: 1852 and 1873’ (Feb. 1873) 13:74 Fortnightly Review 197‒204.Google Scholar
‘Maine’s Early History of Institutions’ (1 Apr. 1875) 20:509 The Nation 225‒226 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Maine’s Early Law and Custom ‒ I’ (23 Aug. 1883) 37:947 The Nation 165‒166.Google Scholar
‘Mill “On Liberty”’ (Feb. 1901) 7:103 Working Men’s College Journal 17‒21.Google Scholar
‘Mill’s Autobiography’ (15 Jan. 1874) 18:446 The Nation 43‒44 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Modern English Law’ (2 Nov. 1876) 23:592 The Nation 273‒274 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Mr. Bryce on the Relation between Whites and Blacks’ (10 July 1902) 75 Nation 26‒28.Google Scholar
‘New Jacobinism and Old Morality’ (Jan.–June 1888) 53 Contemporary Review 475‒502.Google Scholar
‘Novel Reading’ (Nov. 1903) 8:132 Working Men’s College Journal 201.Google Scholar
‘On Private International Law as a Branch of the Law of England’ (1890) 6 Law Quarterly Review 1‒21.Google Scholar
‘Ought the Referendum to Be Introduced into England?’ (Jan.‒June 1890) 57 Contemporary Review 489‒511.Google Scholar
‘A Political Forecast’ (3 Aug. 1882) 35 Nation 89‒90.Google Scholar
‘The Political Outlook in England’ (20 Apr. 1882) 34:877 The Nation 332‒334.Google Scholar
‘Préface de l’édition française’. In Dicey, A. V., Introduction à l’étude du droit constitutionnel. Batut, A. and Jèze, G., trans. Paris: Giard et Brière, 1902, xxix‒xxxii.Google Scholar
‘The Prevalence of Lawlessness in England’ (8 Feb. 1883) 37:944 The Nation 95‒96.Google Scholar
‘The Protest of Irish Protestantism’ (July 1892) 62 Contemporary Review 1‒15.Google Scholar
‘The Referendum’ (Mar. 1894) 23 National Review 65‒72.Google Scholar
‘The Referendum and Its Critics’ (Apr. 1910) 212 Quarterly Review 538‒562.Google Scholar
‘The Reform Act of 1832 and Its Critics’ (Jan. 1883) 33:193 Fortnightly Review 116‒131.Google Scholar
‘The Republic and Christianity’ (Dec. 1857) 1 Undergraduate Papers 16‒19.Google Scholar
Review of The American Commonwealth by Bryce, James (Apr. 1889) 169437 Edinburgh Review 481‒518.Google Scholar
Review of The Common Law by Holmes, O. W. Jr (3 June 1882) The Spectator, Literary Supplement 745‒747 [unsigned].Google Scholar
Review of The Law of Legislative Power in Canada by Lefroy, A. H. F. (1898) 14 Law Quarterly Review 198‒200.Google Scholar
‘Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics – I’ (9 Mar. 1876) 22:558 The Nation 162‒163; ‘Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics – II’ (16 Mar. 1876) 22:558 The Nation 180‒181 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Social Movement in England. – I’. (10 Jan. 1884) 38 The Nation 29‒30; ‘The Social Movement in England. – II’. (17 Jan. 1884) 38 The Nation 49‒51; ‘The Social Movement in England. – III’. (27 Mar. 1884) 38 The Nation 272‒273; ‘The Social Movement in England. – IV’. (17 Apr. 1884) 38 The Nation 337‒338.Google Scholar
‘Some Aspects of Democracy in England’ (July‒Dec. 1883) 137 North American Review 317‒326.Google Scholar
‘Signs of the Times in England’ (11 May 1882) 34 The Nation 395‒397.Google Scholar
‘Sir Alexander Cockburn’ (May 1881) 10 The International Review 397‒410.Google Scholar
‘Sir George Bramwell and the English Bench’ (15 Dec. 1881) 33:859 The Nation 468‒470.Google Scholar
‘Sir Leslie Stephen, K.C.B.’ (17 July 1902) 75:1933 The Nation 49‒50 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Special Correspondence: July 14, 1789–July 14, 1880’ (12 Aug. 1880) 31:789 The Nation 109‒110.Google Scholar
‘Stephen’s History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century’ (30 Aug. 1977) 25:635 The Nation 138‒140 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘Stephen’s “Hours in a Library”’(31 Dec. 1874) 19:496 The Nation 440‒443 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Strength and the Weakness of the Third French Republic’ (July 1910) 68:401 The Nineteenth Century and After 205‒219.Google Scholar
‘Stubbs’s Constitutional History of England’ (4 Mar. 1875) 20:505 The Nation 152‒154 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Study of Jurisprudence’ (1879‒1880) 5 Law Magazine & Review 382‒401.Google Scholar
‘Suggestions on Academical Organisation’ (Oct. 1869) 80: 478 Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 407‒430.Google Scholar
‘Thomas Edward Dicey (Proprietor of the “Mercury” for 50 Years)’. In Hadley, W. W., The Bi-Centenary Record of the Northampton Mercury, 1720‒1920. Northampton: The Mercury Press, 1920, 49‒54.Google Scholar
‘Thoughts on the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland under the Constitution of 1690 (1690‒1707)’ (Apr. 1917) 14 Scottish Historical Review 197‒215.Google Scholar
‘The United States and the Swiss Confederation’ (8 Oct. 1885) 41 The Nation 297‒298.Google Scholar
‘Unjust and Impolitic Provincial Legislation and Its Disallowance by the Governor-General’ (1909) 45 Canada Law Journal 457‒462.Google Scholar
‘Walter Bagehot’ (26 June 1879) 28:730 The Nation 436‒437 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘The Weak Side of the Historical Method’ (12 Apr. 1877) 24:615 The Nation 217‒218 [unsigned].Google Scholar
‘What Is the State of English Opinion about Ireland?’ (2 Feb. 1882) 34 The Nation 95‒97.Google Scholar
‘Why Do People Hate Mr. Gladstone?’ (14 Sept. 1882) 35:898 The Nation 218‒220.Google Scholar
‘Why Englishmen Are Not Alarmed at the Political Crisis’ (14 Jan. 1886) 42 The Nation 340‒341.Google Scholar
‘Woman Suffrage’ (Jan. 1909) 210 Quarterly Review 276‒304.Google Scholar
‘Wordsworth and the War’ (May 1918) 77 The Nineteenth Century and After 1041‒1060.Google Scholar
Introduction à l’étude du droit constitutionnel. A. Batut and G. Jèze, trans.; preface by A. Ribot. Paris: Giard et Brière, 1902.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 4th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1893.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 5th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1897.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 6th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1902.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1908.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1915.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 9th ed. Wade, E. C. S., ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1939.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed. Wade, E. C. S., ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1959.Google Scholar
Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: Macmillan & Co., 1885.Google Scholar
Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1886.Google Scholar
The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume One: Law of the Constitution. Allison, J. W. F., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 [republication of the 1885 edition].Google Scholar
Can English Law Be Taught at the Universities? An Inaugural Lecture, Delivered at All Souls College, 21st April 1883. London: Macmillan & Co., 1883.Google Scholar
A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws. London: Steven & Sons, 1897.Google Scholar
A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Dicey, A. V. and Keith, A. Berriedale, eds. London: Stevens & Son; Sweet & Maxwell, 1922.Google Scholar
England’s Case against Home Rule. London: John Murray, 1886.Google Scholar
A Fool’s Paradise: Being a Constitutionalist’s Criticism on the Home Rule Bill of 1912. London: John Murray, 1913.Google Scholar
The Law of Domicil as a Branch of the Law of England, Stated in the Form of Rules. London: Stevens & Sons, 1879.Google Scholar
A Leap in the Dark, or Our New Constitution. London: John Murray, 1893.Google Scholar
Lectures on Comparative Constitutionalism: The Oxford Edition of Dicey, volume 2. Allison, J. W. F., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. London: Macmillan & Co., 1905; 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1914.Google Scholar
Letters to a Friend on Votes for Women. London: John Murray, 1909.Google Scholar
The Privy Council: The Arnold Prize Essay, 1860. Oxford: T. & G. Shrimpton, 1860; 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1887.Google Scholar
The Statesmanship of Wordsworth: An Essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1917.Google Scholar
(with Rait, R. S.). Thoughts on the Union between England & Scotland. London: Macmillan & Co., 1920.Google Scholar
A Treatise on the Rules for the Selection of the Parties to an Action. London: William Maxwell & Son, 1870.Google Scholar
The Verdict: A Tract on the Political Significance of the Report of the Parnell Commission. London: Cassell & Co., 1890.Google Scholar
Introduction à l’étude du droit constitutionnel. A. Batut and G. Jèze, trans.; preface by A. Ribot. Paris: Giard et Brière, 1902.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1889.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 4th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1893.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 5th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1897.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 6th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1902.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1908.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1915.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 9th ed. Wade, E. C. S., ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1939.Google Scholar
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed. Wade, E. C. S., ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1959.Google Scholar
Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London: Macmillan & Co., 1885.Google Scholar
Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1886.Google Scholar
The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume One: Law of the Constitution. Allison, J. W. F., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 [republication of the 1885 edition].Google Scholar
Can English Law Be Taught at the Universities? An Inaugural Lecture, Delivered at All Souls College, 21st April 1883. London: Macmillan & Co., 1883.Google Scholar
A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws. London: Steven & Sons, 1897.Google Scholar
A Digest of the Law of England with Reference to the Conflict of Laws, 3rd ed. Dicey, A. V. and Keith, A. Berriedale, eds. London: Stevens & Son; Sweet & Maxwell, 1922.Google Scholar
England’s Case against Home Rule. London: John Murray, 1886.Google Scholar
A Fool’s Paradise: Being a Constitutionalist’s Criticism on the Home Rule Bill of 1912. London: John Murray, 1913.Google Scholar
The Law of Domicil as a Branch of the Law of England, Stated in the Form of Rules. London: Stevens & Sons, 1879.Google Scholar
A Leap in the Dark, or Our New Constitution. London: John Murray, 1893.Google Scholar
Lectures on Comparative Constitutionalism: The Oxford Edition of Dicey, volume 2. Allison, J. W. F., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century. London: Macmillan & Co., 1905; 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1914.Google Scholar
Letters to a Friend on Votes for Women. London: John Murray, 1909.Google Scholar
The Privy Council: The Arnold Prize Essay, 1860. Oxford: T. & G. Shrimpton, 1860; 2nd ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1887.Google Scholar
The Statesmanship of Wordsworth: An Essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1917.Google Scholar
(with Rait, R. S.). Thoughts on the Union between England & Scotland. London: Macmillan & Co., 1920.Google Scholar
A Treatise on the Rules for the Selection of the Parties to an Action. London: William Maxwell & Son, 1870.Google Scholar
The Verdict: A Tract on the Political Significance of the Report of the Parnell Commission. London: Cassell & Co., 1890.Google Scholar
Abbott, Edwin. Francis Bacon: An Account of His Life and Works. London: Macmillan & Co., 1885.Google Scholar
Abbott, Evelyn, and Campbell, Lewis. The Life and Letters of Benjamin Jowett, M.A., Master of Balliol College, Oxford. London: John Murray, 1897. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Allen, Carleton Kemp. Law and Orders: An Inquiry into the Nature and Scope of Delegated Legislation and Executive Powers in England. London: Stevens & Sons, 1945.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. A Continental Distinction in the Common Law, a Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume 1: A. V. Dicey, Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution; Volume 2: Comparative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Amos, Sheldon. Fifty Years of the English Constitution, 1830‒1880. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1880.Google Scholar
Annan, Noel. Leslie Stephen, the Godless Victorian. London: Weindenfeld and Nicolson, 1984.Google Scholar
Sir Anson, William. The Law and Custom of the Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1886‒1892. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew. The Adventures of the Constituent Power: Beyond Revolutions? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Archerley, Roger. Britannic Constitution: or, the Fundamental Form of Government in Britain. London: printed for Bettesworth, Osborn, and Longman, 1727.Google Scholar
Arthurs, Harry. ‘Without the Law’: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth-Century England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sir Atkyns, Robert. The Power, Jurisdiction and Priviledge of Parliament and the Antiquity of the House of Commons. London: Printed for Timothy Goodwin, 1689.Google Scholar
Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Second Edition, Being the First Part of a Series of Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law. London: John Murray, 1861 (volume I).Google Scholar
Austin, John. Lectures on Jurisprudence: Being the Sequel to “The Province of Jurisprudence Determined” to Which Are Added Notes and Fragments. London: John Murray, 1863 (volumes 2 and 3).Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. Legal Education in London, 1250–1850 (2007), as reprinted in Sir John Baker, Collected Papers on English Legal History. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Banu, Roxana. Nineteenth Century Perspectives on Private International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bell, Julian, ed. We Did Not Fight: 1914‒18 Experiences of War Resisters. London: Cobden-Sanderson, 1935.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. The Book of Fallacies: From Unfinished Papers of Jeremy Bentham [1824]. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Volume 2. Bowring, John, ed. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. A Fragment on Government; Being an Examination of What Is Delivered, on the Subject of Government in General, in the Introduction to Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries. London: T. Payne, P. Elmsly, E. Brooke, 1776.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation [1780; 1823]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Theory of Legislation, 4th ed. Hildreth, R., trans. London: Trubner & Co., 1882.Google Scholar
Bew, P. Ideology and the Irish Question: Ulster Unionism and Irish Nationalism, 1912‒16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bigot, Grégoire. Introduction historique au droit administratif depuis 1789. Paris: Press universitaires de France, 2002.Google Scholar
Bingham, Tom. Lives of the Law: Selected Essays and Speeches 2000‒2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Blackett, R. J. M. Divided Hearts: Britain and the American Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean. The Six Bookes of a Common-weale. Knolles, Richard, trans. London: G. Bishop, 1606.Google Scholar
Bonham-Carter, Victor. In a Liberal Tradition: A Social Biography 1750–1950. London: Constable, 1960.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. Études de droit constitutionnel: France – Angleterre – États-Unis. Paris: E. Plon, Nourrit et Cie., 1885.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. Studies in Constitutional Law France – England – United States. Dicey, E. M., trans. London: Macmillan & Co., 1891.Google Scholar
Bracton, Henry de. De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae. In Thorne, Samuel E., trans. and ed. Bracton on the Laws and Customs of England. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Bramwell, George. An Analytical Table of the Private Statutes. London: Joseph Butterworth, 1813.Google Scholar
Brown, Desmond H. The Genesis of the Canadian Criminal Code of 1892. Toronto: Osgoode Society, 1989.Google Scholar
Brown, Ford K. Fathers of the Victorians: The Age of Wilberforce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. The Government of Ireland Bill: Speech Delivered in the House of Commons on the Motion for the Second Reading of the Bill for the Future Government of Ireland on 17th May, 1886. London: National Press Agency, 1886.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. Studies in History and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Burdeau, François. Histoire du droit administratif (de la Révolution au début des années 1970). Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the French Revolution, and on the Proceedings of Certain Societies in London Relative to That Event. London: J. Dodsley, 1791.Google Scholar
Burgess, John W. Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law. Boston and London: Ginn & Co., 1890.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Cane, Peter. Controlling Administrative Power: An Historical Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Care, Henry. English Liberties: Or, the Free-Born Subject’s Inheritance. London: Sarah Harris, 1691.Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino. La construction du droit administratif: France et Royaume Uni. Morvillez-Maigret, Jeannine, trans. Paris: Montchrestien, 2000.Google Scholar
Charmont, J. Les analogies de la jurisprudence administrative et de la jurisprudence civile. Paris: J. B. Sirey, 1907.Google Scholar
Chester, D. N. The English Administrative System, 1780–1870. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques. L’Élaboration historique du principe de séparation de la juridiction administrative et de l’administration active. Paris: R. Pichon & R. Durand-Auzias, 1970.Google Scholar
Clark, E. C. Practical Jurisprudence, a Comment on Austin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1883.Google Scholar
Clifford, Frederick. A History of Private Bill Legislation. London: Butterworths, 1885‒1887.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Frederick, ed. Charge of the Lord Chief Justice of England to the Grand Jury at the Central Criminal Court in the Case of the Queen against Nelson and Brand. London: William Ridgway, 1867.Google Scholar
Cocks, R. C. J. Sir Henry Maine: A Study in Victorian Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Colaiaco, James A. James Fitzjames Stephen and the Crisis of Victorian Thought. London: Macmillan Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain 1850‒1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Sir Comyns, John. A Digest of the Laws of England. Volume 4. London: H. Woodfall and W. Strahan, 1766; Volume 5. Anthony Hammond, ed. London: A. Strahan, 1822.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Richard A. The Rule of Law: Albert Venn Dicey, Victorian Jurist. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 1980.Google Scholar
Coumoul, Jules. Traité du pouvoir judiciaire, de son rôle constitutionnel, de sa réforme organique. 2nd ed. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1911.Google Scholar
Cox, Homersham. A History of the Reform Bills of 1866 and 1867. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1868.Google Scholar
Cowell, John. The Interpreter: Or Booke Containing the Signification of Words … Mentioned in the Lawe Writers, or Statutes. Cambridge: Iohn Legate, 1607.Google Scholar
Cowell, John The Institutes of the Lawes of England, Digested into the Method of the Civill or Imperiall Institutions. London: T. Roycroft, 1651.Google Scholar
Craig, P. P. Public Law and Democracy in the United Kingdom and the United States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard, ed. Essays on Reform 1967: A Centenary Tribute. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Cruet, Jean. Étude juridique de l’arbitraire gouvernemental et administrative. Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1906.Google Scholar
Cruise, William. A Digest of the Laws of England respecting Real Property, 3rd ed. London: Joseph Butterworth, 1824.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian, ed. The Book of Common Prayer: The Texts of 1549, 1559, and 1662. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sir Davies, John. Le Primer Report des Cases & Matters en Ley resolues & adijdges en les Courts del Roy en Ireland. Dublin: John Franckton, 1615.Google Scholar
Davitt, Michael. Fall of Feudalism: Or, the Story of the Land League Revolution. London: Harper & Brothers, 1904.Google Scholar
Diamond, A., ed. The Victorian Achievement of Sir Henry Maine: A Centennial Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Real Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1875.Google Scholar
Dimova-Cookson, Maria, and Mander, W. J., eds. T. H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dodd, Cyril, and Wilberforce, H. W. W.. A Guide to the Procedure upon Private Bills. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1898.Google Scholar
Sir Doderidge, John. The English Lawyer: Describing a Method for the Managing of the Lawes of This Land. London: Assignes of I. Moore, 1631.Google Scholar
Dodson, John George. Private Bill Legislation: Speech of Mr. Dodson, in the House of Commons, March 15, 1872. Westminster: J. B. Nichols & Sons, 1872.Google Scholar
Drescher, Seymour. Tocqueville and England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Dubrulle, Hugh. Ambivalent Nation: How Britain Imagined the American Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. Law in the Modern State. Frida and Harold Laski, trans. London: Allen & Overy, 1921.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. Les transformations du droit public. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, 1913.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. Frederick Pollock and the English Juristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: Pathologies of Legality, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Eaglesham, E. The Foundations of Twentieth-Century Education in England. London: Routledge, 1967.Google Scholar
Emden, C. S. The Civil Servant in the Law and the Constitution. London: Stevens & Sons, 1923.Google Scholar
Ésmein, A. Cours élémentaire d’histoire du droit français, à l’usage des étudiants de première année. Paris: Société du recueil général des lois, 1898.Google Scholar
Ésmein, A. Éléments de droit constitutionnel. Paris: Société du recueil général des lois, 1896.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, Trevor J. John Singer Sargent: The Sensualist. Seattle: Seattle Art Museum, 2001.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Adam. Better Day Coming: Blacks and Equality, 1890‒2000. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Fifoot, C. H. S. Judge and Jurist in the Reign of Victoria. London: Stevens and Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
Sir Finch, Henry. A Description of the Common Laws of England, According to the Rules of Art, Compared with the Prerogatives of the King. London: A. Millar, 1759.Google Scholar
Sir Finch, Henry. Nomotexnia; Cestascavoir, Un Description Del Common Leys Dangleterre Solnque les Rules de Art. London: Printed for the Societie of Stationers, 1613.Google Scholar
Fischel, Edward. The English Constitution. Shee, Richard, trans. 2nd ed. London: Bosworth and Harrison, 1863.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. A. L. Frederick William Maitland: A Biographical Sketch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. A. L. James Bryce: Viscount Bryce of Dechmont, O.M. London: Macmillan, 1927. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Ned. A Praiseworthy Device for Amusing and Pacifying Savages? What the Framers Meant by the English Text of the Treaty of Waitangi. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, 2014.Google Scholar
Flogaïtis, Spyridon. Administrative law et droit administratif. Paris: R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias, 1986.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael. The Politics of the British Constitution. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Forsyth, William, ed. Cases and Opinions on Constitutional Law and Various Points of English Jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Haynes, 1869.Google Scholar
Ford, Trowbridge. Albert Venn Dicey: The Man and His Times. Chichester: Barry Rose Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar
Sir Fortescue, John. De Laudibus Legum Angliæ. Amos, A., trans. Cambridge: University Printer, 1825.Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan. Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. E. A. Shils, trans. New York: Oxford University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Freeman, Edward A. The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times. London: Macmillan & Co., 1872.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. Das englische Verwaltungsrecht der Gegenwart Das englische Verwaltungsrecht mit Einschluss des Heeres, der Gerichte und der Kirche geschichtlich und systematisch. Berlin: J. Springer, 1867.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. Das heutige englische Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsrecht. Berlin: J. Springer, 1857.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. The History of the English Constitution. Ashworth, Philip A., trans. London: William Clowes & Sons, 1886. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. Selbstverwaltung Kommunal Verfassung und Verwaltungsgerichte in England. Berlin: J. Springer, 1871.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. Comparative Administrative Law: An Analysis of the Administrative Systems National and Local, of the United States, England, France and Germany. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1893.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. London: Macmillan & Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael. Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK Constitution: Process, Politics and Democracy. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Green, Thomas Hill. Prolegomena to Ethics. Bradely, A. C., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1883.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. Sovereignty: The Origin and Future of a Political and Legal Concept. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, and Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní. Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hadley, W. W. The Bi-Centenary Record of the Northampton Mercury, 1720‒1920. Northampton: The Mercury Press, 1920.Google Scholar
Hague, William. William Wilberforce: The Life of the Great Anti-Slave Trade Campaigner. London: HarperPress, 2007.Google Scholar
Hahn, Erich. ‘Rudolf Gneist and the Prussian Rechtsstaat: 1862‒78’ (1977) 49 (Suppl.) Journal of Modern History D1361‒D1381.Google Scholar
Sir Hale, Matthew. The Original Institution, Power and Jurisdiction of Parliaments. London: Jacob Tonson, Benjamin Barker, Charles King, 1707.Google Scholar
Hall, Catherine, McClelland, Keith, and Rendall, Jane. Defining the Victorian Nation: Class, Race, Gender and the Reform Act of 1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hallam, Henry. View of the State of Europe during the Middle Ages. Volume 2. London: John Murray, 1818.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Lotte, and Hamburger, Joseph. Troubled Lives: John and Sarah Austin. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Hamson, C. J. Executive Discretion and Judicial Control: An Aspect of the French Conseil d’Etat. London: Stevens & Sons, 1954.Google Scholar
Hanbury, Harold Greville. The Vinerian Chair and Legal Education. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frederic. Martial Law: Six Letters to the Daily News. London: The Jamaica Committee, 1867.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. F. C. A History of the Working Men’s College, 1854‒1954. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hartog, P. J., ed. The Owens College Manchester: A Brief History of the College and Description of Its Various Departments. Manchester: J. E. Cornish, 1900.Google Scholar
Harvie, Christopher. A Floating Commonwealth: Politics, Culture, and Technology on Britain’s Atlantic Coast, 1860–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Harvie, Christopher. The Lights of Liberalism: University Liberals and the Challenge of Democracy, 1860‒86. London: Allen Lane, 1976.Google Scholar
Sir Hatton, Christopher. A Treatise Concerning Statutes, or Acts of Parliament: And the Exposition thereof [c. 1576‒1591]. London: Richard Tonson, 1677.Google Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice. La jurisprudence administrative de 1892 à 1929. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1929.Google Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice. Précis de droit administratif et droit public. 8th ed. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1914.Google Scholar
Hearn, W. E. The Government of England: Its Structure and Its Development. London: Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer, 1867.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. G. Foundations of English Administrative Law: Certiorari and Mandamus in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1963.Google Scholar
Hennessey, Thomas. Dividing Ireland, World War I and Partition: The Passing of the Home Rule Bill. London: Routledge Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hilton, Boyd. The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1795‒1865. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hinchcliff, Peter. Benjamin Jowett and the Christian Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil [1651]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1946.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, William Searle. Professor Sir Thomas Erskine Holland, 1835–1926. London: Humphrey Milford, 1927.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. The Elements of Jurisprudence, 4th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888.Google Scholar
Howe, Mark DeWolfe, ed. Holmes-Pollock Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874‒1932. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Howe, Mark DeWolfe Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold J. Laski 1916‒1935. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Hylson-Smith, Kenneth. Evangelicals in the Church of England, 1734‒1984. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1988.Google Scholar
Ions, E. James Bryce and American Democracy, 1870‒1922. London: Macmillan & Co., 1968.Google Scholar
Jacquelin, René. Droit français de la juridiction administrative dans le droit constitutionnel. Paris: A. Giard, 1891.Google Scholar
Jacquelin, René. Une conception de l’ensemble du droit administratif. Paris: A. Giard & E. Briere, 1899.Google Scholar
Jansen, Nils. The Making of Legal Authority: Non-Legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. The Law and the Constitution. London: University of London Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. Local Government in the Modern Constitution. London: University of London Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. Principles of Local Government Law. London: University of London Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Jèze, Gaston. Les principes généraux du droit administratif. 3rd ed. Paris: Marcel Giard, 1925.Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolph von. The Struggle for Law. Lalor, J. J., trans. 5th ed. Chicago: Callaghan, 1879.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S. The French State in Question: Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Keir, D. L., and Lawson, F. H., Cases in Constitutional Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Wedberg, Anders, trans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Victor. Strange Brew: Metaphors of Magic and Science in Rock Music. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Kidd, Colin. Subverting Scotland’s Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo-British Identity, 1689‒c.1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kimball, Bruce A. The Inception of Modern Professional Education: C. C. Langdell, 1826‒1906. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2009.Google Scholar
King, Julia, and Miletic-Vejzovic, Laila eds. The Library of Leonard and Virginia Woolf: A Short-Title Catalog. Pullman: Washington State University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Knaplund, Paul. James Stephen and the British Colonial System, 1813‒1847. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Knight, William A. Memoir of John Nichol, Professor of English Literature in the University of Glasgow. Glasgow: James MacLehose and Sons, 1896.Google Scholar
Kostal, R. W. A Jurisprudence of Power: Victorian Empire and the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Künnecke, Marina. Tradition and Change in Administrative Law: An Anglo-German Comparison. Berlin: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
Laferrière, Édouard. Traité de la juridiction administarative et des recours contentieux. Paris: Berger-Levrault, 1887.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold J. Authority in the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1919.Google Scholar
Lawson, George. Politica Sacra & Civilis: Or, a Model of Civil and Ecclesiastical Government [1660]. 2nd ed. London: J. S., 1689.Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert. Bills of Rights in the Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lefroy, A. H. F. The Law of Legislative Power in Canada. Toronto: Toronto Law Book and Publishing, 1897‒1898.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. The Civil Lawyers in England, 1603‒1641. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Lewans, Matthew. Administrative Law and Judicial Deference. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2018.Google Scholar
Lewis, George Cornewall. An Essay on the Government of Dependencies. London: John Murray, 1841.Google Scholar
Lewis, George Cornewall. Remarks on the Use and Abuse of Some Political Terms [1832], 2nd ed. Oxford: James Thornton, 1877.Google Scholar
Rev. Sir Lewis, Gilbert Frankland, ed. Letters of Sir George Cornewall Lewis, Bart. to Various Friends. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1870.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government: In the Former, the False Principles and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer and His Followers Are Detected and Overthrown, the Latter Is an Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government. London: Printed for Awnsham Churchill, 1690.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Mackworth, Humphrey. A Vindication of the Rights of the Commons of England. London: J. Nutt, 1701.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Ancient Law, Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray, 1861.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Dissertations on Early Law and Custom: Chiefly Selected from Lectures Delivered at Oxford. London: John Murray, 1883.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Lectures on the Early History of Institutions. London: John Murray, 1875.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Village-Communities in the East and West: Six Lectures Delivered at Oxford. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic William. The Constitutional History of England: A Course of Lectures Delivered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic William. Life and Letters of Leslie Stephen. London: Duckworth & Co., 1906.Google Scholar
Mandler, Peter. Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform: Whigs and Liberals, 1830–1852. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Martin, Theodore. On the Present System of Private Bill Legislation. Westminster: J. B. Nichols & Sons, 1872.Google Scholar
McBride, Keally. Mr. Mothercountry: The Man Who Made the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McBride, Nicholas J., and Steel, Sandy. Great Debates in Jurisprudence. London: Palgrave, 2014.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles E. The German Historians and England: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Views. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
McIlwain, Charles Howard. The High Court of Parliament and Its Supremacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain. What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
McLean, Janet. Searching for the State in British Legal Thought: Competing Conceptions of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Merriam, C. E. Jr History of the Theory of Sovereignty Since Rousseau. New York: Columbia University Press, 1900.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Autobiography. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Green, Reader & Dyer, 1873.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son & Bourn, 1861.Google Scholar
Moggach, Doug, and Jones, Gareth Stedman, eds. The 1848 Revolutions and European Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Moloney, Senan. The Phoenix Murders: Conspiracy, Betrayal and Retribution. Dublin: Mercier Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Moyle, J. B., ed. and trans. The Institutes of Justinian. 5th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Nakano-Okuno, Mariko. Sidgwick and Contemporary Utilitarianism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Nares, Robert. Principles of Government Deduced from Reason, Supported by English Experience, and Opposed to French Errors. London: John Stockdale, 1792.Google Scholar
Nettleship, R. L., ed. Works of Thomas Hill Green. Volume 3: Miscellanies and Memoir, 1888. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1888.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter. The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank. Voters, Patrons, and Parties: The Unreformed Electoral System of Hanoverian England, 1734–1832. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Oliver, Peter. The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Otter, Sandra M. den British Idealism and Social Explanation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. Rights of Man: Being an Answer to Mr. Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution. London: J.S. Jordan, 1791.Google Scholar
Paley, William. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. London: printed for R. Faulder, 1785.Google Scholar
Sir Palmer, Roundell. A Speech Delivered in the House of Commons, on Tuesday July 11, 1871, on Moving Resolutions for the Establishment of a General School of Law. Westminster: J. B. Nichols & Sons, 1871.Google Scholar
Perry, R. Ross. Common-Law Pleading: Its History and Principles Including Dicey’s Rules Concerning Parties to Actions and Stephen’s Rules of Pleading. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1897.Google Scholar
[Petyt, George]. Lex Parliamentaria: Or, a Treatise of the Laws and Custom of the Parliaments of England [1690]. London: Henry Lintot, 1748.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood The Principles of English Law and the Constitution. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1939.Google Scholar
Plowden, Francis. Jura Anglorum: The Rights of Englishmen. London: E. & R. Brooke, 1792.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957; 1987 reissue.Google Scholar
Sir Pollock, Frederick. Essays on Jurisprudence and Ethics. London: Macmillan & Co., 1882.Google Scholar
Sir Pollock, Frederick. A First Book of Jurisprudence for Students of the Common Law London: Macmillan & Co., 1896; 2nd ed. Macmillan & Co., 1904.Google Scholar
Poole, Thomas. Reason of State: Law, Prerogative and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Prynne, William. The Soveraigne Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes: Divided into Fovre Parts. London: Printed for Michael Sparke, 1643.Google Scholar
Raina, P., ed. A. V. Dicey: General Characteristics of English Constitutionalism, Six Unpublished Lectures. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.Google Scholar
Rait, Robert S., ed. Memorials of Albert Venn Dicey, Being Chiefly Letters and Diaries. London: Macmillan & Co., 1925.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and his Age. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1964.Google Scholar
Robson, William. Justice and Administrative Law: A Study of the British Constitution. 3rd ed. London: Stevens & Sons, 1951.Google Scholar
Rumble, Wilfred E. Doing Austin Justice: The Reception of John Austin’s Philosophy of Law in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Russell, Lord John. An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution, from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, 1823.Google Scholar
Salmond, John W. Jurisprudence, or the Theory of the Law. London: Stevens & Haynes, 1902.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Seitzer, Jeffrey, trans. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard. French Administrative Law and the Common Law World. New York: New York University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Scrutton, Thomas Edward. The Influence of the Roman Law on the Law of England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1885.Google Scholar
Searle, G. R. The Liberal Party: Triumph and Disintegration, 1886‒1929. London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 1992.Google Scholar
Sedley, Stephen. Lions under the Throne: Essays on the History of English Public Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Shultz, Bart. Henry Sidgwick: The Eye of the Universe – An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Alfred, and Sidgwick, Eleanor. Henry Sidgwick: A Memoir. London: Macmillan & Co., 1906.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan & Co., 1874. 7th. ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1907.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. What Is the Third Estate? Blondel, M., trans. and Finer, S. E., ed. London: Phaidon Press Ltd., 1964.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. Qu’est-ce que le Tiers état? [1789]. Paris: Éditions du Boucher, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Goldwin. The Reorganization of the University of Oxford. Oxford: James Parker & Co., 1868.Google Scholar
Smith, K. J. M. James Fitzjames Stephen: Portrait of a Victorian Rationalist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. de Judicial Review of Administrative Action. London: Stevens & Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
Sir Smith, Thomas. De Republica Anglorum: A Discourse on the Commonwealth of England [1583]. Alston, L., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1906.Google Scholar
Smith, T. B. British Justice: The Scottish Contribution. London: Stevens & Sons, 1961.Google Scholar
Smith, T. B. Scotland: The Development of Its Laws and Constitution. London: Stevens & Sons, 1962.Google Scholar
Snyder, Laura J. Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Spalding, Frances. Vanessa Bell: Portrait of the Bloomsbury Artist. London: George Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983.Google Scholar
Spedding, James, Leslie, Robert Ellis, , and Heath, Douglas Denon, eds. Works of Francis Bacon. Boston: Houghlin, Mifflin and Co, 1858.Google Scholar
St German, Christopher. Dialogue between a Doctor of Divinity and a Student in the Laws of England [1523‒1531]. Plucknett, T. F. T. and Barton, J. L., eds. London: Selden Society, 1974.Google Scholar
St John Stevas, Norman, ed. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Volume 1. London: The Economist, 1965‒1978.Google Scholar
Stansky, Peter, and Abrahams, William. Julian Bell: From Bloomsbury to the Spanish Civil War. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. Legal Foundations of Tribunals in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. The Victorian Taxpayer and the Law: A Study in Constitutional Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. Legal Evolution: The Story of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Stephen, Caroline Emelia. The First Sir James Stephen; Letters with Biographical Notes. Printed for Private Circulation Only, 1906.Google Scholar
Stephen, Caroline Emelia. The Service of the Poor; Being an Inquiry into the Reasons for and against the Establishment of Religious Sisterhoods for Charitable Purposes. London: Edward Hicks, 1871.Google Scholar
Stephen, Caroline Emelia. The Vision of Faith, and Other Essays. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Limited, 1911.Google Scholar
Stephen, Henry John. New Commentaries on the Laws of England (Partly Founded on Blackstone). London: C. Rowoth and Sons, 1841‒1845. 4 volumes.Google Scholar
Stephen, Henry John. A Treatise on the Principles of Pleading in Civil Actions; Comprising a Summary View of the Whole Proceeding in a Suit at Law. London: Joseph Butterworth, 1824.Google Scholar
Stephen, James. The Crisis of the Sugar Colonies: Or, an Enquiry into the Objects and Probable Effects of the French Expedition to the West Indies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1802.Google Scholar
Stephen, James. The Memoirs of James Stephen, Written by Himself for the Use of His Children. Bevington, Merle M., ed. London: Hogarth Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Stephen, James. The Slavery of the British West India Colonies Delineated: As It Exists Both in Law and Practice, and Compared with the Slavery of Other Countries, Antient and Modern. London: Littlewood and Co., 1830.Google Scholar
Sir Stephen, James. Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography, 4th ed. London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, 1860.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. A Digest of the Law of Evidence. London: Macmillan & Co., 1876.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. A General View of the Criminal Law of England. London and Cambridge: Macmillan & Co., 1863.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. A History of the Criminal Law of England. London: Macmillan & Co., 1883. 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1873.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie. The Life of Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, Bart., K.C.S.I., A Judge of the High Court of Justice. 2nd ed. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1895.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. T. Q. The Ulster Crisis, Resistance to Home Rule, 1912–14. London:Faber and Faber, 1967.Google Scholar
Stubbs, William. The Constitutional History of England in Its Origin and Development. London: Macmillan & Co., 1874‒1878. 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Sypnowich, Christine. Equality Renewed: Justice, Flourishing and the Egalitarian Ideal. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. Laissez-faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth Century Britain. London: Palgrave, 1972.Google Scholar
Terry, C. S. The Scottish Parliament: Its Constitution and Procedure, 1603–1707. Glasgow: James MacLehose & Sons, 1905.Google Scholar
Tierney, Stephen. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Reeve, Henry, trans. 7th ed. New York: Edward Walker, 1847.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Stephen. The Clapham Sect: How Wilberforce’s Circle Transformed Britain. Oxford: Lion Hudson, 2010.Google Scholar
Townshend, C. Political Violence in Ireland: Government and Resistance Since 1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, James. Bibliotheca Politica: Or an Enquiry into the Ancient Constitution of the English Government. London: Printed for R. Baldwin, 1694.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Viner, Charles. A General Abridgment of the Law and Equity, Alphabetically Digested under Proper Titles [1756]. 2nd ed. London: R. Brooke, 1793.Google Scholar
Wade, E. C. S., and Phillips, G. Godfrey. Constitutional Law. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1931.Google Scholar
Weidenfeld, Katia. Histoire du droit administratif du XIVe siècle à nos jours. Paris: Economica, 2010.Google Scholar
West, Richard, and Defoe, Daniel. A Discourse Concerning Treasons, and Bills of Attainder. London: J. Roberts, 1716.Google Scholar
Wilson, Geoffrey. Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Michael. Nationalism and the Irish Party: Provincial Ireland, 1910‒1916. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy: A New Edition with Additional Lectures. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1862.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. The Elements of Morality, Including Polity. London: John W. Parker, 1848. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. History of Moral Philosophy in England. London: John W. Parker & Son, 1852.Google Scholar
Wilberforce, Edward. Statute Law: The Principles Which Govern the Construction and Operation of Statutes. London: Stevens & Sons, 1881.Google Scholar
Wood, Thomas. An Institute of the Laws of England; or, the Laws of England in Their Natural Order, According to Common Use [1720]. 3rd ed. London: Printed by E. and R. Nutt and R. Gosling for Richard Sare, 1724.Google Scholar
Wood, Thomas. An Institute of the Laws of England; or, the Laws of England in Their Natural Order, According to Common Use. 10th ed. London: Printed by W. Strahan and M. Woodfall, for J. Whiston, 1772.Google Scholar
Zoller, Élisabeth. Introduction to Public Law: A Comparative Study. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008.Google Scholar
Adams, George Burton. ‘The Descendants of the Curia Regis’ (1907) 13 American Historical Review 11‒15.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Dworkin and Dicey: The Rule of Law as Integrity’ (1988) 8 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 266‒277.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Editor’s Introduction to Volume One’. In Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume I: The Law of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, xi‒xlvii.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘History in the Law of the Constitution’ (2007) 28 Journal of Legal History 263‒282.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Introduction’. In Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume II: Comparative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, xxxii‒xxxiii.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Preface to The Oxford Edition of Dicey’. In Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘The Spirits of the Constitution’. In Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter, eds. Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 27‒56.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Variation of View on English Legal Distinctions between Public and Private’ (2007) 66 Cambridge Law Journal 698‒711.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip. ‘The Courts and Parliament: Who Whom?’ (1979) 38 Cambridge Law Journal 79‒117.Google Scholar
Annan, Noel. ‘The Intellectual Aristocracy’. In Plumb, J. H., ed. Studies in Social History: A Tribute to G. M. Trevelyan. London: Longmans, 1955, 243‒287.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Review of Conflict of Laws, by A. V. Dicey (30 Jan. 1897) 15 The Speaker: A Quarterly Magazine 133‒134.Google Scholar
Anson, W. R. ‘The Government of Ireland Bill and the Sovereignty of Parliament’ (1886) 2 Law Quarterly Review 427‒443.Google Scholar
Arndt, H. W. ‘The Origin of Dicey’s Concept of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 31 Australian Law Journal 117‒123.Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. W. ‘Jonah and the Whale: The Appearance, Disappearance, and Reappearance of Administrative Law’ (1980) 30 University of Toronto Law Journal 225‒239.Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. W. ‘Rethinking Administrative Law: A Slightly Dicey Business’ (1979) 17 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1‒45.Google Scholar
Bates, David. ‘Political Unity and the Spirit of Law: Judicial Concepts of the State in the Late Third Republic’ (2005) 28 French Historical Studies 69‒101.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. ‘Doctor Bonham’s Case: Statutory Construction or Constitutional Theory’ (1969) 117 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 521‒545.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. Jr ‘The Expansion of American Administrative Law’ (1917) 30 Harvard Law Review 430‒448.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. ‘Constitutional Law and Politics’ (1987) 7 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 454‒464.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. ‘Dicey and the Reform of the Constitution’ [1985] Public Law 652‒78.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. ‘Western Europe’. In Butler, David and Ranney, Austin, eds. Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington DC: AEI Press, 1994, 24‒97.Google Scholar
Boudin, Louis B. ‘Lord Coke and the American Doctrine of Judicial Power’ (1929) 6 New York University Law Review 223‒246.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. ‘L’État et l’individu en Angleterre’. In Annales de l’École libre des sciences politiques. Paris: Germer Baillière, 1887, 485‒522.Google Scholar
Boyer, Allen Dillard. ‘“Understanding, Authority, and Will”: Sir Edward Coke and the Elizabethan Origins of Judicial Review’ (1997) 39 Boston College Law Review 43‒93.Google Scholar
Braun, Alexandra. ‘The English Codification Debate and the Role of Jurists in the Development of Legal Doctrines’. In Lobban, Michael and Moses, Julia, eds. The Impact of Ideas on Legal Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 204‒225.Google Scholar
Brink, David O. ‘Introduction’. In Dimova-Cookson, Maria and Mander, W. J., eds. T. H. Green’s Prolegomena to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brodrick, G .C. ‘A History of the University of Oxford: Oxford and Its Professors’ (Oct. 1889) 170:348 Edinburgh Review 303‒327.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. ‘American Judges’ (Nov. 1871–Apr. 1872) 25 Macmillan’s Magazine 422‒432.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. ‘The Legal Profession in America’ (Nov. 1871–Apr. 1872) 25 Macmillan’s Magazine 206‒217.Google Scholar
Buckland, C. E. Review of Law and Public Opinion (1915) 15 (n.s.) Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 266‒267.Google Scholar
Cassesse, Sabino. ‘Albert Venn Dicey e il diritto amministrativo’ (1990) 19 Quaderni Fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico modern 5‒82.Google Scholar
Chrimes, S. B. ‘The Constitutional Ideas of Dr. John Cowell’ (1949) 49 English Historical Review 461‒487.Google Scholar
Cilleuls, Alfred des. Commentaire sur Introduction à l’étude du droit constitutionnel par M. Dicey, Bulletin du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, Section des Sciences économique et sociales, Année 1902. Paris: 1903.Google Scholar
Clark, E. C. ‘Jurisprudence; Its Use and Its Place in Legal Education’ (1885) 1 Law Quarterly Review 201‒206.Google Scholar
Cohn, Margit. ‘Medieval Chains, Invisible Inks: On Non-Statutory Powers of the Executive’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 97‒122.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. ‘The Establishment of Judicial Review’ (1910–11) 9 Michigan Law Review 102‒125.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. ‘The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law, Part II’ (1929) 42 Harvard Law Review 365‒409.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Richard. ‘Law’. In Van Arsdel, Rosemary T. and Vann, J. Don, eds. Victorian Periodicals and Victorian Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, 11‒21.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Richard. ‘The Reception of Analytic Jurisprudence: The Victorian Debate on the Separation of Law and Morality’ (1981) 74 Durham University Journal 50.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. ‘Dicey: Unitary, Self-Correcting Democracy and Public Law’ (1990) 106 Law Quarterly Review 105‒143.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’ [1997] Public Law 467‒487.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’ [1998] Public Law 63‒90.Google Scholar
Dickinson, H. T. ‘The Eighteenth-Century Debate on the Sovereignty of Parliament’ (1976) 26 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 189‒210.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. ‘Objective Law. III’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 126‒143; ‘Objective Law. IV’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 242‒256.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. ‘English Jurisprudence between Austin and Hart’ (2005) 91 Virginia Law Review 1‒91.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey’ (2011) 24 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 411‒430.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Compulsion of Legality’. In Ramraj, Victor, ed. Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 33‒59.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Form and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review’. In Forsyth, Christopher, ed. Judicial Review and the Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000, 279‒307.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Geneology of Legal Positivism’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 39‒67.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law’ (2001) 20 Law and Philosophy 461‒498.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Hobbes’s Constitutional Theory’. In Shapiro, Ian, ed. Leviathan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010, 453‒480.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Hobbes on the Authority of Law’. In Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas, eds. Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 186‒209.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘How Hobbes Met the “Hobbes Challenge”’ (2009) 72 Modern Law Review 488‒506.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’. In Taggart, Michael, ed. The Province of Administrative Law. Oxford: Hart, 1997, 279‒307.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Puzzle of Martial Law’ (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 1‒64.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency inside or outside the Legal Order?’ (2006) 27 Cardozo Law Review 2005‒2039.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Ludwik. ‘Comparative Public Law and the Fundamentals of Its Study’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 623‒646.Google Scholar
Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Constitution’ (2009) 22 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 267‒290.Google Scholar
Elton, Charles. Review of Law of the Constitution (3 Apr. 1886) 726 The Academy 229‒230.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. ‘Was Entick v. Carrington a Landmark?’ In Tomkins, Adam and Scott, Paul, eds. Entick v. Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Errera, Roger. ‘Dicey and French Administrative Law: A Missed Encounter?’ [1985] Public Law 695‒707.Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. ‘The Law and the Constitution: Manifesto of the Progressive Party’ (2004) 67 Modern Law Review 734‒752.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale. ‘The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 210‒239.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix. ‘The Task of Administrative Law’ (1927) 75 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 614‒621.Google Scholar
Friedmann, W. ‘French Administrative Law and the Common-Law World’ (1955) 11 University of Toronto Law Journal 143‒147.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Ralph F. ‘Concepts and Policies in Anglo-American Administrative Law Theory’ (1938) 47 Yale Law Journal 538‒576.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick. ‘A Concept of Legal Tradition’ (2008) 34 Queen’s Law Journal 427‒445.Google Scholar
Goebel, Julius Jr. ‘Constitutional History and Constitutional Law’ (1938) 38 Columbia Law Review 555‒577.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. ‘The Self-Destruction of Legal Positivism’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 449‒486.Google Scholar
Goodare, Julian. ‘The Estates in the Scottish Parliament, 1286‒1707’ (1996) 15 Parliamentary History 11‒32.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Arthur L. ‘English Contributions to the Philosophy of Law’ (1948) 48 Columbia Law Review 671‒688.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Arthur L. ‘Introduction’. In Sir Frederick Pollock, Jurisprudence and Legal Essays. London: Macmillan & Co., 1963.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Arthur L. ‘The Rule of Law and Absolute Sovereignty’ (1958) 106 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 943‒963.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. ‘The Executive and the Courts’ (1886) 1 Political Science Quarterly 533‒559.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. ‘The Writ of Certiorari’ (1891) 6 Political Science Quarterly 493‒536.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. M. ‘The Relation of Facts to Jurisdiction’ (1929) 45 Law Quarterly Review 459‒493.Google Scholar
Grant, James A. ‘The Ideals of the Rule of Law’ (2017) 37 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 383‒405.Google Scholar
Gray, Charles M. ‘Bonham’s Case Reviewed’ (1972) 116 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 35‒58.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. ‘Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation’ [1879‒1880]. In Nettleship, R. L., ed. Works of Thomas Hill Green. Volume 2: Philosophical Works. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1886, 335‒552.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren. ‘Extra-legality and the Ethic of Political Responsibility’ In Ramraj, Victor, ed. Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 61‒93.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren. ‘Stability and Flexibility: A Dicey Business’. In Ramraj, Victor, Hor, Michael, and Roach, Kent, eds. Global Anti-terrorism Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 90‒106.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, and Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní, Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hahn, Erich. ‘Rudolph Gneist and the Prussian Rechtsstaat: 1862‒78’ (1977) 49 (Supp.) Journal of Modern History D1361‒D1381.Google Scholar
Haldane, R. B. (Viscount of Cloan), ‘The Constitutional Evolution of the Civil Service’ (1923) 2 Journal of Public Administration 9‒22.Google Scholar
Hall, Hugh. ‘Jurisprudence’. In Stedman, A. M. M., ed. Oxford: Its Life and Schools. London: George Bell & Sons, 1887, 266‒296.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip A. ‘Revolution and Judicial Review: Chief Justice Holt’s Opinion in City of London v. Wood’ (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review 2091‒2153.Google Scholar
Hand, G. J. ‘A. V. Dicey’s Unpublished Materials on the Comparative Study of Constitutions’. In Hand, G. J. and McBride, J., eds. Droit sans Frontières: Essays in Honour of L. Neville Brown. Birmingham: Holdsworth Club, 1991, 77‒92.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol. ‘Disposing of Dicey: From Legal Autonomy to Constitutional Discourse’ (2000) 48 Political Studies 356‒369.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Holmes’ Common Law’ (17 Oct. 1963) 1:4 New York Review of Books 15‒16.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593‒629.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. Burnett. ‘The Rule of Law in Historical Perspective’ (1961) 59 Michigan Law Review 487‒500.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frederic. “The English School of Jurisprudence. Part I. Austin and Maine on Sovereignty” (1878) 24 The Fortnightly Review 479.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frederic. Review of Lectures on the Law of the Constitution by A. V. Dicey (1885) 1 Law Quarterly Review 502‒505.Google Scholar
Harvie, Christopher. ‘Ideology and Home Rule: James Bryce, A. V. Dicey and Ireland, 1880‒1887’ (1976) 91 English Historical Review 298‒314.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H. ‘Bonham’s Case, Judicial Review, and the Law of Nature’ (2009) 1 Journal of Legal Analysis 325‒354.Google Scholar
Henderson, James Youngblood. ‘The Doctrine of Aboriginal Rights in Western Legal Tradition’. In Boldt, Menno and Long, J. Anthony, eds. The Quest for Justice: Aboriginal Peoples and Aboriginal Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985, 185‒220.Google Scholar
Ilbert, C. P. ‘Sir James Stephen as a Legislator’ (1894) 10 Law Quarterly Review 222‒227.Google Scholar
Innes, Joanna. ‘Legislating for Three Kingdoms: How the Westminster Parliament Legislated for England, Scotland and Ireland, 1707‒1830’. In Hoppit, Julian, ed. Parliaments, Nations and Identities in Britain and Ireland, 1660‒1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003, 15‒47.Google Scholar
Jacquelin, René. ‘L’Évolution de la procédure administrative’. In Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et à l’étranger. Volume 1. 1903, 373‒447.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L., and Henderson, Edith G.. ‘Judicial Review and the Rule of Law: Historical Origins’ (1956) 72 Law Quarterly Review 345‒364.Google Scholar
[James, Edward, and Stephen, James Fitzjames]. ‘Case and Joint Opinion of Mr. Edward James, Q. C., and Mr. Fitzjames Stephen, Q. C., on Martial Law, with Reference to the Jamaica Insurrection’. In Forsyth, William, ed. Cases and Opinions on Constitutional Law and Various Points of English Jurisprudence, 1866. London: Stevens & Haynes, 1869, 551‒563.Google Scholar
Jenks, Edward. ‘The Prerogative Writs in English Law’ (1923) 32 Yale Law Journal 523‒534.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, H. ‘Remarks on Certain Points in Mr. Dicey’s “Law of the Constitution”’ (1887) 3 Law Quarterly Review 204‒210.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. ‘Administrative Law and Administrative Jurisdiction’ (1938) 20 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 99‒104.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. ‘Courts and Administrative Law: The Experience of English Housing Legislation’ (1936) 49 Harvard Law Review 426‒454.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. Review of The Law of the Constitution, 9th ed., by Dicey, A. V. (1940) 3 Modern Law Review 321‒322.Google Scholar
Jones, Harry W. ‘The Rule of Law and the Welfare State’ (1958) 58 Columbia Law Review 143‒156.Google Scholar
Jordan, Donald. ‘The Irish National League and the “Unwritten Law”: Rural Protest and Nation-Building in Ireland 1882‒1890’ (Feb. 1998) 158 Past & Present 146‒171.Google Scholar
Jowell, Jeffrey. ‘The Rule of Law’. In Jowell, Jeffrey, Oliver, Dawn, and O’Cinneide, Colm, eds. The Changing Constitution, 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 13‒37.Google Scholar
Kirby, James. ‘A. V. Dicey and English Constitutionalism’ (2019) 45 History of European Ideas 33‒46.Google Scholar
Lakin, Stuart. ‘Debunking the Idea of Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Controlling Factor of Legality in the British Constitution’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 709‒734.Google Scholar
La Nauze, J. A. ‘Hearn and the “Government of England”’ (1967) 26 Australian Journal of Public Administration 303‒310.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold. ‘The Responsibility of the State in England’ (1919) 32 Harvard Law Review 447‒472.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. ‘“Office Is a Thing Borrowed”: Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government’ (2013) 41 Political Theory 409‒440.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. ‘Unmaking Law: Jean Bodin on Law, Equity, and Legal Change’ (2018) 39 History of Political Thought 269‒296.Google Scholar
Lefcowitz, Allan B., and Lefcowitz, Barbara F.. ‘James Bryce’s First Visit to America: The New England Sections of His 1870 Journal and Related Correspondence’ (June 1977) 50:2 New England Quarterly 314‒331.Google Scholar
Lester, Anthony. ‘Fundamental Rights in the United Kingdom: The Law and the British Constitution’ (1976) 125 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 337‒363.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. ‘The English Civilians, 1500‒1750’. In Prest, Wilfrid, ed. Lawyers in Early Modern Europe and America. London: Croom Helm, 1981, 108‒128.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. ‘Law and Ideology: The Civil Law and Theories of Absolutism in Elizabethan and Jacobean England’. In Dubrow, Heather and Strier, Richard, eds. The Historical Renaissance: New Essays on Tudor and Stuart Literature and Culture. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1988, 220‒241.Google Scholar
Lewans, Matthew. ‘Rethinking the Diceyan Dialectic’ (2008) 58 University of Toronto Law Journal 75‒104.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. Underwood. ‘Sir Edward Coke (1552‒1633): His Theory of “Artificial Reason” as a Construct for Modern Basic Legal Theory’ (1968) 84 Law Quarterly Review 330‒342.Google Scholar
Little, Gavin. ‘Scotland and Parliamentary Sovereignty’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies 540‒567.Google Scholar
Lindsay, A. D. ‘Sovereignty’ (1924) 24 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 235‒254.Google Scholar
Lino, Dylan. ‘Albert Venn Dicey and the Constitutional Theory of Empire’ (2016) 36 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 751‒780.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael. ‘Was There a Nineteenth Century “English School of Jurisprudence”?’ (1995) 16 Journal of Legal History 34‒62.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. ‘Constituent Power Subverted: From English Constitutional Argument to British Constitutional Practice’ in Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil, eds. The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, 27‒48.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. ‘Representation and Constitutional Theory’. In Craig, Paul and Rawlings, Richard, eds. Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, 47‒66.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, and Tierney, Stephen, ‘The Shibboleth of Sovereignty’ (2018) 81 Modern Law Review 989‒1016.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. P. ‘Albert Venn Dicey’ (Apr. 1922) 17:310 Working Men’s College Journal 223‒224.Google Scholar
Lucas, W. W. ‘Immunity of the Crown from Mandamus’ (1909) 25 Law Quarterly Review 290‒296.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. ‘Does the United Kingdom have a Constitution? Reflections on MacCormick v. Lord Advocate’ (1978) 29 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 1‒20.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. ‘Jurisprudence and the Constitution’ (1983) 36 Current Legal Problems 13‒30.Google Scholar
MacKay, R. A. ‘Coke – Parliamentary Sovereignty or the Rule of Law?’ (1924) 22 Michigan Law Review 215‒247.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. ‘Why the History of English Law Is Not Written’ [1888]. In Fisher, H. A. L., ed. The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911, 480‒497.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. ‘William Stubbs, Bishop of Oxford’ (July 1901) 16:63 English Historical Review 417‒426.Google Scholar
Markby, W. ‘Analytical Jurisprudence’ (Aug. 1876) 1 (5th ser.) Law Magazine and Review 624‒30.Google Scholar
McDowell, Gary L. ‘Coke, Corwin and the Constitution: The “Higher Law Background” Reconsidered’ (1993) 55 Review of Politics 393‒420.Google Scholar
McGarry, John. ‘The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty’ (2012) 32 Legal Studies 577‒599.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., and Taylor, M. W., ‘Liberalism and the Referendum in British Political Thought 1890–1914’ (1990) 1 Twentieth Century British History 37‒45.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. ‘Austin on Jurisprudence’, Edinburgh Review (Oct. 1863). Reprinted in John Stuart Mill, Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical and Historical. Volume 3. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1867, 206‒274.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. ‘Whewell on Moral Philosophy’ (1852). In Robson, John M., ed. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: Volume X – Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society (Utilitarianism). Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985, 167‒202.Google Scholar
Mitchell, James. ‘Re-inventing the Union: Dicey, Devolution, and the Union’. In Miller, William L., ed. Anglo-Scottish Relations, from 1900 to Devolution and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 35‒49.Google Scholar
Morrison, Trevor W. ‘Suspension and the Extrajudicial Constitution’ (2007) 107 Columbia Law Review 1533‒1616.Google Scholar
Müller, Frank Lorenz. ‘Before “The West”: Rudolf von Gneist’s English Utopia’. In Bavaj, Riccardo and Steber, Martina, eds. Germany and ‘the West’: The History of a Modern Concept. New York: Berghahn Books, 2015, 152‒166.Google Scholar
Newman, Warren J. ‘The Principles of the Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty in Constitutional Theory and Litigation’ (2005) 17 National Journal of Constitutional Law 175‒296.Google Scholar
Orth, John V. ‘Did Sir Edward Coke Mean What He Said?’ (1999) 16 Constitutional Commentary 33‒38.Google Scholar
Parker, Edmund M. Review of Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. (1909) 3 American Political Science Review 362‒370.Google Scholar
Parker, Edmund M. ‘State and Official Liability’ (1906) 19 Harvard Law Review 335‒349.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood ‘Constitutional Conventions: Dicey’s Predecessors’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Review 137‒148.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood ‘Dicey’s Law of the Constitution: A Personal View’ [1985] Public Law 587‒595.Google Scholar
Plucknett, Theodore F. T. ‘Bonham’s Case and Judicial Review’ (1926) 40 Harvard Law Review 30‒70.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick. ‘Dicey on the Conflict of Laws’ (3 Oct. 1896) The Spectator 17‒19.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick. ‘The History of the Science of Politics – IV’. (1 Jan. to 1 June 1883) 33 (new ser.) Fortnightly Review 83‒99.Google Scholar
Poole, Thomas. ‘Judicial Review at the Margins: Law, Power, and Prerogative’ (2010) 60 University of Toronto Law Journal 81‒108.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. ‘The Scope and Purpose of Sociological Jurisprudence’ (1911‒1912) 25 Harvard Law Review 489‒516.Google Scholar
Prosser, Tony. ‘Understanding the British Constitution’ (1996) 44 Political Studies 473‒487.Google Scholar
Prothero, G. W. ‘Gneist on the English Constitution’ (1888) 3 English Historical Review 1‒33.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. ‘A. V. Dicey: The Referendum as the People’s Veto’ (1999) 20 History of Political Thought 531‒546.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’ (1980) 77 Journal of Philosophy 515‒572.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. ‘Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics’ (1951) 60 Philosophical Review 177‒197.Google Scholar
Risk, R. C. B. ‘A. H. F. Lefroy: Common Law Thought in Late Nineteenth-Century Canada: On Burying One’s Grandfather’ (1991) 41 University of Toronto Law Journal 307‒331.Google Scholar
Ritchie, David G. ‘On the Conception of Sovereignty’ (1891) 1 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 385‒411.Google Scholar
Robson, William A. ‘Dicey’s Law of the Constitution: A Review’ (1939) 38 Michigan Law Review 205‒207.Google Scholar
Robson, William A. ‘The Report of the Committee on Ministers’ Powers’ (1932) 3 Political Quarterly 346‒364.Google Scholar
Rumple, Wilfrid. ‘John Austin and His Nineteenth Century Critics: The Case of Sir Henry Maine’ (1988) 39 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 119‒149.Google Scholar
Sait, Edward McChesney. Review of Law of the Constitution, 9th ed. (1941) 46 American Historical Review 399‒400.Google Scholar
Salmond, John W. ‘The Names and Nature of the Law’ (1899) 6 Law Quarterly Review 367‒377.Google Scholar
Santoro, Emilio. ‘The Rule of Law and the “Liberties of the English”: The Interpretation of Albert Venn Dicey’. In Costa, Pietro and Zolo, Danilo, eds. The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007, 153‒199.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David. ‘A. V. Dicey, Lord Watson, and the Law of the Canadian Constitution in the Late Nineteenth Century’ (1998) 16 Law and History Review 495‒526.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. ‘Jeremy Bentham and Nineteenth-Century English Jurisprudence’ (1991) 12 Journal of Legal History 58‒88.Google Scholar
Sir Sedley, Stephen. ‘Foreword’. In Taggart, Michael, ed. The Province of Administrative Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997, vii‒viii.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. N. ‘Political Theory and the Rule of Law’. In Hutchinson, A. C. and Monahan, Patrick, eds. The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology. Toronto: Carswell, 1987, 1‒16.Google Scholar
Simard, Augustin. ‘Tocqueville, Dicey et le “problème” du droit administratif’ (2017) 38 Tocqueville Review 271‒298.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B. ‘The Common Law and Legal Theory’. In Simpson, A. W. B., ed. Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, second series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973, 77‒99.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B. ‘The Rise and Fall of the Legal Treatise: Legal Principles and the Forms of Legal Literature’ (1981) 48 University of Chicago Law Review 632‒679.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. ‘A Genealogy of the Modern State’ (2009) 162 Proceedings of the British Academy 325‒370.Google Scholar
II Smith, George P. ‘Dr. Bonham’s Case and the Modern Significance of Lord Coke’s Influence’ (1966) 41 Washington Law Review 297‒314.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. de ‘The Limits of Judicial Review: Statutory Discretions and the Doctrine of Ultra Vires’ (1948) 11 Modern Law Review 306‒325.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. de ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty Unmasked – Mr. Pickin Changes Trains’ (1973) 32 Cambridge Law Journal 8‒10.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Julia. ‘Dicey and His Legacy’ (1995) 16 History of Political Thought 234‒256.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. ‘The Appeal by Way of Case Stated from the Determinations of General Commissioners of Income Tax: An Historical Perspective’ (1996) British Tax Review 611‒618.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. ‘Bureaucratic Adjudication: The Internal Appeals of the Inland Revenue’. In Brand, Paul and Getzler, Joshua, eds. Judges and Judging in the History of the Common Law and Civil Law: From Antiquity to Modern Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 157‒174.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. ‘The General Commissioners of Income Tax: Assessors or Adjudicators?’ (1993) British Tax Review 52‒64.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. ‘Biographical Notice of Sir James Stephen’. In Sir Stephen, James, Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography, 4th ed. London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, 1860, xi‒xvii.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. ‘English Jurisprudence’, Review of The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, 2nd ed. by Austin, John, and Ancient Law by Henry Sumner Maine (Oct. 1861) 114:232 Edinburgh Review 456‒486.Google Scholar
Sir Stephen, James. ‘Colonization as a Branch of Social Economy’ (13 Oct. 1858). In Knaplund, James Stephen and the British Colonial System, 281‒298.Google Scholar
Strahan, J. A. ‘Lord Bryce: Personal Recollections’ (1922) 38 Law Quarterly Review 235‒239.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘From Legal Biography to Legal Life Writing: Broadening Conceptions of Legal History and Socio-Legal Scholarship’ (2015) 42 Journal of Law and Society 7‒36.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘The Legal Boundaries of Liberty: Dicey, Liberalism and Legal Science’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Review 102‒111.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘Legal Theory, the Common Law Mind and the Making of the Textbook Tradition’. In Twinning, W., ed. Legal Theory and Common Law. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986, 26‒61.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘Making Respected Gentlemen out of Law Professors: A Commentary on Albert Venn Dicey, Can English Law Be Taught at the Universities (1883)’. In Kultur ind Beruf in Europa. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2012, 161‒168.Google Scholar
Sykes, John G. W. “II – Jurisprudence: A Review” (1875) 4 Law Magazine and Review 491‒492.Google Scholar
Tener, Robert H. ‘The Spectator Records, 1874‒1897’ (Spring 1960) 17 The Victorian Newsletter 33‒36.Google Scholar
Thorburn, Malcolm. ‘Justifications, Powers, and Authority’ (2008) 117 Yale Law Journal 1070‒1130.Google Scholar
Touster, Saul. ‘Holmes a Hundred Years Ago: The Common Law and Legal Theory’ (1981‒1982) 10 Hofstra Law Review 673‒717.Google Scholar
Twining, William. ‘R. G. Collingwood’s Autobiography: One Reader’s Response’ (1998) 25 Journal of Law and Society 603‒620.Google Scholar
Tyler, Amanda L. ‘Suspension as an Emergency Power’ (2009) 118 Yale Law Journal 600‒694.Google Scholar
Vinogradoff, Paul. ‘The Teaching of Sir Henry Maine’ (1904) 20 Law Quarterly Review 119‒133.Google Scholar
Wade, E. C. S. ‘Preface’ and ‘Introduction’. In Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 9th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1939.Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R. ‘The Basis of Legal Sovereignty’ (1955) 13 Cambridge Law Journal 172‒197.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. ‘Are Constitutional Norms Legal Norms?’ (2006) 75 Fordham Law Review 1697‒1713.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Deliberating about Constitutionalism’. In Kong, Hoi, Levy, Ron, Orr, Graeme, and King, Jeff eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 167‒180.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Dicey on Writing the Law of the Constitution’ (2012) 32 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21‒49.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Judicial Review of Ministerial Advice to the Crown’ (2016) 25 Constitutional Forum 33‒42.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘The Law behind the Conventions of the Constitution: Reassessing the Prorogation Debate’ (2011) 5 Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law 131‒154.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Legal Humanism and Law as Integrity’ (2008) 67 Cambridge Law Journal 352‒375.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Respecting Deference as Respect: Rights, Reasonableness and Proportionality in Canadian Administrative Law’. In Elliott, Mark and Wilberg, Hanna, eds. The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015, 395‒422.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Toward the Unity of Constitutional Value – or, How to Capture a Pluralistic Hedgehog’ (2017) 63 McGill Law Journal 1‒21.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘The Unwritten Constitution as a Legal Concept’. In Dyzenhaus, David and Thorburn, Malcolm, eds. The Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 33‒52.Google Scholar
Watt, Horatia Muir. ‘Theorizing Private International Law’. In Orford, Anne, Hoffmann, Florian, and Clark, Martin, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 862‒881.Google Scholar
Westlake, John. Review of Conflict of Laws by A. V. Dicey (1896) 12 Law Quarterly Review 397‒401.Google Scholar
Williams, Ian. ‘Dr. Bonham’s Case and “Void” Statutes’ (2006) 27 Journal of Legal History 111‒128.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. ‘The Study of Administration’ (1887) 2 Political Science Quarterly 197‒222.Google Scholar
Youngblood Henderson, James. ‘The Doctrine of Aboriginal Rights in Western Legal Tradition’. In Boldt, Menno and Long, J. Anthony, eds. The Quest for Justice: Aboriginal Peoples and Aboriginal Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985, 185‒220.Google Scholar
Abbott, Edwin. Francis Bacon: An Account of His Life and Works. London: Macmillan & Co., 1885.Google Scholar
Abbott, Evelyn, and Campbell, Lewis. The Life and Letters of Benjamin Jowett, M.A., Master of Balliol College, Oxford. London: John Murray, 1897. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Allen, Carleton Kemp. Law and Orders: An Inquiry into the Nature and Scope of Delegated Legislation and Executive Powers in England. London: Stevens & Sons, 1945.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. A Continental Distinction in the Common Law, a Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume 1: A. V. Dicey, Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution; Volume 2: Comparative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Amos, Sheldon. Fifty Years of the English Constitution, 1830‒1880. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1880.Google Scholar
Annan, Noel. Leslie Stephen, the Godless Victorian. London: Weindenfeld and Nicolson, 1984.Google Scholar
Sir Anson, William. The Law and Custom of the Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1886‒1892. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew. The Adventures of the Constituent Power: Beyond Revolutions? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Archerley, Roger. Britannic Constitution: or, the Fundamental Form of Government in Britain. London: printed for Bettesworth, Osborn, and Longman, 1727.Google Scholar
Arthurs, Harry. ‘Without the Law’: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth-Century England. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sir Atkyns, Robert. The Power, Jurisdiction and Priviledge of Parliament and the Antiquity of the House of Commons. London: Printed for Timothy Goodwin, 1689.Google Scholar
Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Second Edition, Being the First Part of a Series of Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law. London: John Murray, 1861 (volume I).Google Scholar
Austin, John. Lectures on Jurisprudence: Being the Sequel to “The Province of Jurisprudence Determined” to Which Are Added Notes and Fragments. London: John Murray, 1863 (volumes 2 and 3).Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. Legal Education in London, 1250–1850 (2007), as reprinted in Sir John Baker, Collected Papers on English Legal History. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Banu, Roxana. Nineteenth Century Perspectives on Private International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bell, Julian, ed. We Did Not Fight: 1914‒18 Experiences of War Resisters. London: Cobden-Sanderson, 1935.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. The Book of Fallacies: From Unfinished Papers of Jeremy Bentham [1824]. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Volume 2. Bowring, John, ed. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. A Fragment on Government; Being an Examination of What Is Delivered, on the Subject of Government in General, in the Introduction to Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries. London: T. Payne, P. Elmsly, E. Brooke, 1776.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation [1780; 1823]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1879.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Theory of Legislation, 4th ed. Hildreth, R., trans. London: Trubner & Co., 1882.Google Scholar
Bew, P. Ideology and the Irish Question: Ulster Unionism and Irish Nationalism, 1912‒16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bigot, Grégoire. Introduction historique au droit administratif depuis 1789. Paris: Press universitaires de France, 2002.Google Scholar
Bingham, Tom. Lives of the Law: Selected Essays and Speeches 2000‒2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Blackett, R. J. M. Divided Hearts: Britain and the American Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean. The Six Bookes of a Common-weale. Knolles, Richard, trans. London: G. Bishop, 1606.Google Scholar
Bonham-Carter, Victor. In a Liberal Tradition: A Social Biography 1750–1950. London: Constable, 1960.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. Études de droit constitutionnel: France – Angleterre – États-Unis. Paris: E. Plon, Nourrit et Cie., 1885.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. Studies in Constitutional Law France – England – United States. Dicey, E. M., trans. London: Macmillan & Co., 1891.Google Scholar
Bracton, Henry de. De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae. In Thorne, Samuel E., trans. and ed. Bracton on the Laws and Customs of England. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Bramwell, George. An Analytical Table of the Private Statutes. London: Joseph Butterworth, 1813.Google Scholar
Brown, Desmond H. The Genesis of the Canadian Criminal Code of 1892. Toronto: Osgoode Society, 1989.Google Scholar
Brown, Ford K. Fathers of the Victorians: The Age of Wilberforce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. The Government of Ireland Bill: Speech Delivered in the House of Commons on the Motion for the Second Reading of the Bill for the Future Government of Ireland on 17th May, 1886. London: National Press Agency, 1886.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. Studies in History and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Burdeau, François. Histoire du droit administratif (de la Révolution au début des années 1970). Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the French Revolution, and on the Proceedings of Certain Societies in London Relative to That Event. London: J. Dodsley, 1791.Google Scholar
Burgess, John W. Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law. Boston and London: Ginn & Co., 1890.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Cane, Peter. Controlling Administrative Power: An Historical Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Care, Henry. English Liberties: Or, the Free-Born Subject’s Inheritance. London: Sarah Harris, 1691.Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino. La construction du droit administratif: France et Royaume Uni. Morvillez-Maigret, Jeannine, trans. Paris: Montchrestien, 2000.Google Scholar
Charmont, J. Les analogies de la jurisprudence administrative et de la jurisprudence civile. Paris: J. B. Sirey, 1907.Google Scholar
Chester, D. N. The English Administrative System, 1780–1870. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques. L’Élaboration historique du principe de séparation de la juridiction administrative et de l’administration active. Paris: R. Pichon & R. Durand-Auzias, 1970.Google Scholar
Clark, E. C. Practical Jurisprudence, a Comment on Austin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1883.Google Scholar
Clifford, Frederick. A History of Private Bill Legislation. London: Butterworths, 1885‒1887.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Frederick, ed. Charge of the Lord Chief Justice of England to the Grand Jury at the Central Criminal Court in the Case of the Queen against Nelson and Brand. London: William Ridgway, 1867.Google Scholar
Cocks, R. C. J. Sir Henry Maine: A Study in Victorian Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Colaiaco, James A. James Fitzjames Stephen and the Crisis of Victorian Thought. London: Macmillan Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain 1850‒1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Sir Comyns, John. A Digest of the Laws of England. Volume 4. London: H. Woodfall and W. Strahan, 1766; Volume 5. Anthony Hammond, ed. London: A. Strahan, 1822.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Richard A. The Rule of Law: Albert Venn Dicey, Victorian Jurist. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 1980.Google Scholar
Coumoul, Jules. Traité du pouvoir judiciaire, de son rôle constitutionnel, de sa réforme organique. 2nd ed. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1911.Google Scholar
Cox, Homersham. A History of the Reform Bills of 1866 and 1867. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1868.Google Scholar
Cowell, John. The Interpreter: Or Booke Containing the Signification of Words … Mentioned in the Lawe Writers, or Statutes. Cambridge: Iohn Legate, 1607.Google Scholar
Cowell, John The Institutes of the Lawes of England, Digested into the Method of the Civill or Imperiall Institutions. London: T. Roycroft, 1651.Google Scholar
Craig, P. P. Public Law and Democracy in the United Kingdom and the United States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard, ed. Essays on Reform 1967: A Centenary Tribute. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Cruet, Jean. Étude juridique de l’arbitraire gouvernemental et administrative. Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1906.Google Scholar
Cruise, William. A Digest of the Laws of England respecting Real Property, 3rd ed. London: Joseph Butterworth, 1824.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian, ed. The Book of Common Prayer: The Texts of 1549, 1559, and 1662. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sir Davies, John. Le Primer Report des Cases & Matters en Ley resolues & adijdges en les Courts del Roy en Ireland. Dublin: John Franckton, 1615.Google Scholar
Davitt, Michael. Fall of Feudalism: Or, the Story of the Land League Revolution. London: Harper & Brothers, 1904.Google Scholar
Diamond, A., ed. The Victorian Achievement of Sir Henry Maine: A Centennial Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Real Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1875.Google Scholar
Dimova-Cookson, Maria, and Mander, W. J., eds. T. H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dodd, Cyril, and Wilberforce, H. W. W.. A Guide to the Procedure upon Private Bills. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1898.Google Scholar
Sir Doderidge, John. The English Lawyer: Describing a Method for the Managing of the Lawes of This Land. London: Assignes of I. Moore, 1631.Google Scholar
Dodson, John George. Private Bill Legislation: Speech of Mr. Dodson, in the House of Commons, March 15, 1872. Westminster: J. B. Nichols & Sons, 1872.Google Scholar
Drescher, Seymour. Tocqueville and England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Dubrulle, Hugh. Ambivalent Nation: How Britain Imagined the American Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. Law in the Modern State. Frida and Harold Laski, trans. London: Allen & Overy, 1921.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. Les transformations du droit public. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, 1913.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. Frederick Pollock and the English Juristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: Pathologies of Legality, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Eaglesham, E. The Foundations of Twentieth-Century Education in England. London: Routledge, 1967.Google Scholar
Emden, C. S. The Civil Servant in the Law and the Constitution. London: Stevens & Sons, 1923.Google Scholar
Ésmein, A. Cours élémentaire d’histoire du droit français, à l’usage des étudiants de première année. Paris: Société du recueil général des lois, 1898.Google Scholar
Ésmein, A. Éléments de droit constitutionnel. Paris: Société du recueil général des lois, 1896.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, Trevor J. John Singer Sargent: The Sensualist. Seattle: Seattle Art Museum, 2001.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Adam. Better Day Coming: Blacks and Equality, 1890‒2000. New York: Penguin Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Fifoot, C. H. S. Judge and Jurist in the Reign of Victoria. London: Stevens and Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
Sir Finch, Henry. A Description of the Common Laws of England, According to the Rules of Art, Compared with the Prerogatives of the King. London: A. Millar, 1759.Google Scholar
Sir Finch, Henry. Nomotexnia; Cestascavoir, Un Description Del Common Leys Dangleterre Solnque les Rules de Art. London: Printed for the Societie of Stationers, 1613.Google Scholar
Fischel, Edward. The English Constitution. Shee, Richard, trans. 2nd ed. London: Bosworth and Harrison, 1863.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. A. L. Frederick William Maitland: A Biographical Sketch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. A. L. James Bryce: Viscount Bryce of Dechmont, O.M. London: Macmillan, 1927. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Ned. A Praiseworthy Device for Amusing and Pacifying Savages? What the Framers Meant by the English Text of the Treaty of Waitangi. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, 2014.Google Scholar
Flogaïtis, Spyridon. Administrative law et droit administratif. Paris: R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias, 1986.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael. The Politics of the British Constitution. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Forsyth, William, ed. Cases and Opinions on Constitutional Law and Various Points of English Jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Haynes, 1869.Google Scholar
Ford, Trowbridge. Albert Venn Dicey: The Man and His Times. Chichester: Barry Rose Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar
Sir Fortescue, John. De Laudibus Legum Angliæ. Amos, A., trans. Cambridge: University Printer, 1825.Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, Evan. Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. E. A. Shils, trans. New York: Oxford University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Freeman, Edward A. The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times. London: Macmillan & Co., 1872.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. Das englische Verwaltungsrecht der Gegenwart Das englische Verwaltungsrecht mit Einschluss des Heeres, der Gerichte und der Kirche geschichtlich und systematisch. Berlin: J. Springer, 1867.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. Das heutige englische Verfassungs- und Verwaltungsrecht. Berlin: J. Springer, 1857.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. The History of the English Constitution. Ashworth, Philip A., trans. London: William Clowes & Sons, 1886. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf von. Selbstverwaltung Kommunal Verfassung und Verwaltungsgerichte in England. Berlin: J. Springer, 1871.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. Comparative Administrative Law: An Analysis of the Administrative Systems National and Local, of the United States, England, France and Germany. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1893.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. London: Macmillan & Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael. Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK Constitution: Process, Politics and Democracy. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Green, Thomas Hill. Prolegomena to Ethics. Bradely, A. C., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1883.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. Sovereignty: The Origin and Future of a Political and Legal Concept. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, and Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní. Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hadley, W. W. The Bi-Centenary Record of the Northampton Mercury, 1720‒1920. Northampton: The Mercury Press, 1920.Google Scholar
Hague, William. William Wilberforce: The Life of the Great Anti-Slave Trade Campaigner. London: HarperPress, 2007.Google Scholar
Hahn, Erich. ‘Rudolf Gneist and the Prussian Rechtsstaat: 1862‒78’ (1977) 49 (Suppl.) Journal of Modern History D1361‒D1381.Google Scholar
Sir Hale, Matthew. The Original Institution, Power and Jurisdiction of Parliaments. London: Jacob Tonson, Benjamin Barker, Charles King, 1707.Google Scholar
Hall, Catherine, McClelland, Keith, and Rendall, Jane. Defining the Victorian Nation: Class, Race, Gender and the Reform Act of 1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hallam, Henry. View of the State of Europe during the Middle Ages. Volume 2. London: John Murray, 1818.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Lotte, and Hamburger, Joseph. Troubled Lives: John and Sarah Austin. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Hamson, C. J. Executive Discretion and Judicial Control: An Aspect of the French Conseil d’Etat. London: Stevens & Sons, 1954.Google Scholar
Hanbury, Harold Greville. The Vinerian Chair and Legal Education. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frederic. Martial Law: Six Letters to the Daily News. London: The Jamaica Committee, 1867.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. F. C. A History of the Working Men’s College, 1854‒1954. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hartog, P. J., ed. The Owens College Manchester: A Brief History of the College and Description of Its Various Departments. Manchester: J. E. Cornish, 1900.Google Scholar
Harvie, Christopher. A Floating Commonwealth: Politics, Culture, and Technology on Britain’s Atlantic Coast, 1860–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Harvie, Christopher. The Lights of Liberalism: University Liberals and the Challenge of Democracy, 1860‒86. London: Allen Lane, 1976.Google Scholar
Sir Hatton, Christopher. A Treatise Concerning Statutes, or Acts of Parliament: And the Exposition thereof [c. 1576‒1591]. London: Richard Tonson, 1677.Google Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice. La jurisprudence administrative de 1892 à 1929. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1929.Google Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice. Précis de droit administratif et droit public. 8th ed. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1914.Google Scholar
Hearn, W. E. The Government of England: Its Structure and Its Development. London: Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer, 1867.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. G. Foundations of English Administrative Law: Certiorari and Mandamus in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1963.Google Scholar
Hennessey, Thomas. Dividing Ireland, World War I and Partition: The Passing of the Home Rule Bill. London: Routledge Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hilton, Boyd. The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1795‒1865. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hinchcliff, Peter. Benjamin Jowett and the Christian Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil [1651]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1946.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, William Searle. Professor Sir Thomas Erskine Holland, 1835–1926. London: Humphrey Milford, 1927.Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine. The Elements of Jurisprudence, 4th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888.Google Scholar
Howe, Mark DeWolfe, ed. Holmes-Pollock Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874‒1932. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Howe, Mark DeWolfe Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold J. Laski 1916‒1935. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Hylson-Smith, Kenneth. Evangelicals in the Church of England, 1734‒1984. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1988.Google Scholar
Ions, E. James Bryce and American Democracy, 1870‒1922. London: Macmillan & Co., 1968.Google Scholar
Jacquelin, René. Droit français de la juridiction administrative dans le droit constitutionnel. Paris: A. Giard, 1891.Google Scholar
Jacquelin, René. Une conception de l’ensemble du droit administratif. Paris: A. Giard & E. Briere, 1899.Google Scholar
Jansen, Nils. The Making of Legal Authority: Non-Legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. The Law and the Constitution. London: University of London Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. Local Government in the Modern Constitution. London: University of London Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. Principles of Local Government Law. London: University of London Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Jèze, Gaston. Les principes généraux du droit administratif. 3rd ed. Paris: Marcel Giard, 1925.Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolph von. The Struggle for Law. Lalor, J. J., trans. 5th ed. Chicago: Callaghan, 1879.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S. The French State in Question: Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Keir, D. L., and Lawson, F. H., Cases in Constitutional Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Wedberg, Anders, trans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Victor. Strange Brew: Metaphors of Magic and Science in Rock Music. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Kidd, Colin. Subverting Scotland’s Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo-British Identity, 1689‒c.1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kimball, Bruce A. The Inception of Modern Professional Education: C. C. Langdell, 1826‒1906. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2009.Google Scholar
King, Julia, and Miletic-Vejzovic, Laila eds. The Library of Leonard and Virginia Woolf: A Short-Title Catalog. Pullman: Washington State University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Knaplund, Paul. James Stephen and the British Colonial System, 1813‒1847. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Knight, William A. Memoir of John Nichol, Professor of English Literature in the University of Glasgow. Glasgow: James MacLehose and Sons, 1896.Google Scholar
Kostal, R. W. A Jurisprudence of Power: Victorian Empire and the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Künnecke, Marina. Tradition and Change in Administrative Law: An Anglo-German Comparison. Berlin: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
Laferrière, Édouard. Traité de la juridiction administarative et des recours contentieux. Paris: Berger-Levrault, 1887.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold J. Authority in the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1919.Google Scholar
Lawson, George. Politica Sacra & Civilis: Or, a Model of Civil and Ecclesiastical Government [1660]. 2nd ed. London: J. S., 1689.Google Scholar
Leckey, Robert. Bills of Rights in the Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Lefroy, A. H. F. The Law of Legislative Power in Canada. Toronto: Toronto Law Book and Publishing, 1897‒1898.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. The Civil Lawyers in England, 1603‒1641. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Lewans, Matthew. Administrative Law and Judicial Deference. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2018.Google Scholar
Lewis, George Cornewall. An Essay on the Government of Dependencies. London: John Murray, 1841.Google Scholar
Lewis, George Cornewall. Remarks on the Use and Abuse of Some Political Terms [1832], 2nd ed. Oxford: James Thornton, 1877.Google Scholar
Rev. Sir Lewis, Gilbert Frankland, ed. Letters of Sir George Cornewall Lewis, Bart. to Various Friends. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1870.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government: In the Former, the False Principles and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer and His Followers Are Detected and Overthrown, the Latter Is an Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government. London: Printed for Awnsham Churchill, 1690.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Mackworth, Humphrey. A Vindication of the Rights of the Commons of England. London: J. Nutt, 1701.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Ancient Law, Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. London: John Murray, 1861.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Dissertations on Early Law and Custom: Chiefly Selected from Lectures Delivered at Oxford. London: John Murray, 1883.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Lectures on the Early History of Institutions. London: John Murray, 1875.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. Village-Communities in the East and West: Six Lectures Delivered at Oxford. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic William. The Constitutional History of England: A Course of Lectures Delivered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic William. Life and Letters of Leslie Stephen. London: Duckworth & Co., 1906.Google Scholar
Mandler, Peter. Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform: Whigs and Liberals, 1830–1852. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Martin, Theodore. On the Present System of Private Bill Legislation. Westminster: J. B. Nichols & Sons, 1872.Google Scholar
McBride, Keally. Mr. Mothercountry: The Man Who Made the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McBride, Nicholas J., and Steel, Sandy. Great Debates in Jurisprudence. London: Palgrave, 2014.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles E. The German Historians and England: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Views. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
McIlwain, Charles Howard. The High Court of Parliament and Its Supremacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain. What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
McLean, Janet. Searching for the State in British Legal Thought: Competing Conceptions of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Merriam, C. E. Jr History of the Theory of Sovereignty Since Rousseau. New York: Columbia University Press, 1900.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Autobiography. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Green, Reader & Dyer, 1873.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son & Bourn, 1861.Google Scholar
Moggach, Doug, and Jones, Gareth Stedman, eds. The 1848 Revolutions and European Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Moloney, Senan. The Phoenix Murders: Conspiracy, Betrayal and Retribution. Dublin: Mercier Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Moyle, J. B., ed. and trans. The Institutes of Justinian. 5th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Nakano-Okuno, Mariko. Sidgwick and Contemporary Utilitarianism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Nares, Robert. Principles of Government Deduced from Reason, Supported by English Experience, and Opposed to French Errors. London: John Stockdale, 1792.Google Scholar
Nettleship, R. L., ed. Works of Thomas Hill Green. Volume 3: Miscellanies and Memoir, 1888. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1888.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter. The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Frank. Voters, Patrons, and Parties: The Unreformed Electoral System of Hanoverian England, 1734–1832. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Oliver, Peter. The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Otter, Sandra M. den British Idealism and Social Explanation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. Rights of Man: Being an Answer to Mr. Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution. London: J.S. Jordan, 1791.Google Scholar
Paley, William. The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy. London: printed for R. Faulder, 1785.Google Scholar
Sir Palmer, Roundell. A Speech Delivered in the House of Commons, on Tuesday July 11, 1871, on Moving Resolutions for the Establishment of a General School of Law. Westminster: J. B. Nichols & Sons, 1871.Google Scholar
Perry, R. Ross. Common-Law Pleading: Its History and Principles Including Dicey’s Rules Concerning Parties to Actions and Stephen’s Rules of Pleading. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1897.Google Scholar
[Petyt, George]. Lex Parliamentaria: Or, a Treatise of the Laws and Custom of the Parliaments of England [1690]. London: Henry Lintot, 1748.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood The Principles of English Law and the Constitution. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1939.Google Scholar
Plowden, Francis. Jura Anglorum: The Rights of Englishmen. London: E. & R. Brooke, 1792.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957; 1987 reissue.Google Scholar
Sir Pollock, Frederick. Essays on Jurisprudence and Ethics. London: Macmillan & Co., 1882.Google Scholar
Sir Pollock, Frederick. A First Book of Jurisprudence for Students of the Common Law London: Macmillan & Co., 1896; 2nd ed. Macmillan & Co., 1904.Google Scholar
Poole, Thomas. Reason of State: Law, Prerogative and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
Prynne, William. The Soveraigne Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes: Divided into Fovre Parts. London: Printed for Michael Sparke, 1643.Google Scholar
Raina, P., ed. A. V. Dicey: General Characteristics of English Constitutionalism, Six Unpublished Lectures. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.Google Scholar
Rait, Robert S., ed. Memorials of Albert Venn Dicey, Being Chiefly Letters and Diaries. London: Macmillan & Co., 1925.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and his Age. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1964.Google Scholar
Robson, William. Justice and Administrative Law: A Study of the British Constitution. 3rd ed. London: Stevens & Sons, 1951.Google Scholar
Rumble, Wilfred E. Doing Austin Justice: The Reception of John Austin’s Philosophy of Law in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Russell, Lord John. An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution, from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time. 2nd ed. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, 1823.Google Scholar
Salmond, John W. Jurisprudence, or the Theory of the Law. London: Stevens & Haynes, 1902.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Constitutional Theory. Seitzer, Jeffrey, trans. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard. French Administrative Law and the Common Law World. New York: New York University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Scrutton, Thomas Edward. The Influence of the Roman Law on the Law of England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1885.Google Scholar
Searle, G. R. The Liberal Party: Triumph and Disintegration, 1886‒1929. London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 1992.Google Scholar
Sedley, Stephen. Lions under the Throne: Essays on the History of English Public Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Shultz, Bart. Henry Sidgwick: The Eye of the Universe – An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Alfred, and Sidgwick, Eleanor. Henry Sidgwick: A Memoir. London: Macmillan & Co., 1906.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan & Co., 1874. 7th. ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1907.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. What Is the Third Estate? Blondel, M., trans. and Finer, S. E., ed. London: Phaidon Press Ltd., 1964.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph. Qu’est-ce que le Tiers état? [1789]. Paris: Éditions du Boucher, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Goldwin. The Reorganization of the University of Oxford. Oxford: James Parker & Co., 1868.Google Scholar
Smith, K. J. M. James Fitzjames Stephen: Portrait of a Victorian Rationalist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. de Judicial Review of Administrative Action. London: Stevens & Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
Sir Smith, Thomas. De Republica Anglorum: A Discourse on the Commonwealth of England [1583]. Alston, L., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1906.Google Scholar
Smith, T. B. British Justice: The Scottish Contribution. London: Stevens & Sons, 1961.Google Scholar
Smith, T. B. Scotland: The Development of Its Laws and Constitution. London: Stevens & Sons, 1962.Google Scholar
Snyder, Laura J. Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Spalding, Frances. Vanessa Bell: Portrait of the Bloomsbury Artist. London: George Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1983.Google Scholar
Spedding, James, Leslie, Robert Ellis, , and Heath, Douglas Denon, eds. Works of Francis Bacon. Boston: Houghlin, Mifflin and Co, 1858.Google Scholar
St German, Christopher. Dialogue between a Doctor of Divinity and a Student in the Laws of England [1523‒1531]. Plucknett, T. F. T. and Barton, J. L., eds. London: Selden Society, 1974.Google Scholar
St John Stevas, Norman, ed. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Volume 1. London: The Economist, 1965‒1978.Google Scholar
Stansky, Peter, and Abrahams, William. Julian Bell: From Bloomsbury to the Spanish Civil War. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. Legal Foundations of Tribunals in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. The Victorian Taxpayer and the Law: A Study in Constitutional Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. Legal Evolution: The Story of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Stephen, Caroline Emelia. The First Sir James Stephen; Letters with Biographical Notes. Printed for Private Circulation Only, 1906.Google Scholar
Stephen, Caroline Emelia. The Service of the Poor; Being an Inquiry into the Reasons for and against the Establishment of Religious Sisterhoods for Charitable Purposes. London: Edward Hicks, 1871.Google Scholar
Stephen, Caroline Emelia. The Vision of Faith, and Other Essays. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons Limited, 1911.Google Scholar
Stephen, Henry John. New Commentaries on the Laws of England (Partly Founded on Blackstone). London: C. Rowoth and Sons, 1841‒1845. 4 volumes.Google Scholar
Stephen, Henry John. A Treatise on the Principles of Pleading in Civil Actions; Comprising a Summary View of the Whole Proceeding in a Suit at Law. London: Joseph Butterworth, 1824.Google Scholar
Stephen, James. The Crisis of the Sugar Colonies: Or, an Enquiry into the Objects and Probable Effects of the French Expedition to the West Indies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1802.Google Scholar
Stephen, James. The Memoirs of James Stephen, Written by Himself for the Use of His Children. Bevington, Merle M., ed. London: Hogarth Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Stephen, James. The Slavery of the British West India Colonies Delineated: As It Exists Both in Law and Practice, and Compared with the Slavery of Other Countries, Antient and Modern. London: Littlewood and Co., 1830.Google Scholar
Sir Stephen, James. Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography, 4th ed. London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, 1860.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. A Digest of the Law of Evidence. London: Macmillan & Co., 1876.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. A General View of the Criminal Law of England. London and Cambridge: Macmillan & Co., 1863.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. A History of the Criminal Law of England. London: Macmillan & Co., 1883. 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1873.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie. The Life of Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, Bart., K.C.S.I., A Judge of the High Court of Justice. 2nd ed. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1895.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. T. Q. The Ulster Crisis, Resistance to Home Rule, 1912–14. London:Faber and Faber, 1967.Google Scholar
Stubbs, William. The Constitutional History of England in Its Origin and Development. London: Macmillan & Co., 1874‒1878. 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Sypnowich, Christine. Equality Renewed: Justice, Flourishing and the Egalitarian Ideal. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. Laissez-faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth Century Britain. London: Palgrave, 1972.Google Scholar
Terry, C. S. The Scottish Parliament: Its Constitution and Procedure, 1603–1707. Glasgow: James MacLehose & Sons, 1905.Google Scholar
Tierney, Stephen. Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Reeve, Henry, trans. 7th ed. New York: Edward Walker, 1847.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Stephen. The Clapham Sect: How Wilberforce’s Circle Transformed Britain. Oxford: Lion Hudson, 2010.Google Scholar
Townshend, C. Political Violence in Ireland: Government and Resistance Since 1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, James. Bibliotheca Politica: Or an Enquiry into the Ancient Constitution of the English Government. London: Printed for R. Baldwin, 1694.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Viner, Charles. A General Abridgment of the Law and Equity, Alphabetically Digested under Proper Titles [1756]. 2nd ed. London: R. Brooke, 1793.Google Scholar
Wade, E. C. S., and Phillips, G. Godfrey. Constitutional Law. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1931.Google Scholar
Weidenfeld, Katia. Histoire du droit administratif du XIVe siècle à nos jours. Paris: Economica, 2010.Google Scholar
West, Richard, and Defoe, Daniel. A Discourse Concerning Treasons, and Bills of Attainder. London: J. Roberts, 1716.Google Scholar
Wilson, Geoffrey. Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Michael. Nationalism and the Irish Party: Provincial Ireland, 1910‒1916. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy: A New Edition with Additional Lectures. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1862.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. The Elements of Morality, Including Polity. London: John W. Parker, 1848. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. History of Moral Philosophy in England. London: John W. Parker & Son, 1852.Google Scholar
Wilberforce, Edward. Statute Law: The Principles Which Govern the Construction and Operation of Statutes. London: Stevens & Sons, 1881.Google Scholar
Wood, Thomas. An Institute of the Laws of England; or, the Laws of England in Their Natural Order, According to Common Use [1720]. 3rd ed. London: Printed by E. and R. Nutt and R. Gosling for Richard Sare, 1724.Google Scholar
Wood, Thomas. An Institute of the Laws of England; or, the Laws of England in Their Natural Order, According to Common Use. 10th ed. London: Printed by W. Strahan and M. Woodfall, for J. Whiston, 1772.Google Scholar
Zoller, Élisabeth. Introduction to Public Law: A Comparative Study. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008.Google Scholar
Adams, George Burton. ‘The Descendants of the Curia Regis’ (1907) 13 American Historical Review 11‒15.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Dworkin and Dicey: The Rule of Law as Integrity’ (1988) 8 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 266‒277.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Editor’s Introduction to Volume One’. In Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume I: The Law of the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, xi‒xlvii.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘History in the Law of the Constitution’ (2007) 28 Journal of Legal History 263‒282.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Introduction’. In Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey, Volume II: Comparative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, xxxii‒xxxiii.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Preface to The Oxford Edition of Dicey’. In Allison, J. W. F., ed. The Oxford Edition of Dicey. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘The Spirits of the Constitution’. In Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter, eds. Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 27‒56.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Variation of View on English Legal Distinctions between Public and Private’ (2007) 66 Cambridge Law Journal 698‒711.Google Scholar
Allott, Philip. ‘The Courts and Parliament: Who Whom?’ (1979) 38 Cambridge Law Journal 79‒117.Google Scholar
Annan, Noel. ‘The Intellectual Aristocracy’. In Plumb, J. H., ed. Studies in Social History: A Tribute to G. M. Trevelyan. London: Longmans, 1955, 243‒287.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Review of Conflict of Laws, by A. V. Dicey (30 Jan. 1897) 15 The Speaker: A Quarterly Magazine 133‒134.Google Scholar
Anson, W. R. ‘The Government of Ireland Bill and the Sovereignty of Parliament’ (1886) 2 Law Quarterly Review 427‒443.Google Scholar
Arndt, H. W. ‘The Origin of Dicey’s Concept of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 31 Australian Law Journal 117‒123.Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. W. ‘Jonah and the Whale: The Appearance, Disappearance, and Reappearance of Administrative Law’ (1980) 30 University of Toronto Law Journal 225‒239.Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. W. ‘Rethinking Administrative Law: A Slightly Dicey Business’ (1979) 17 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1‒45.Google Scholar
Bates, David. ‘Political Unity and the Spirit of Law: Judicial Concepts of the State in the Late Third Republic’ (2005) 28 French Historical Studies 69‒101.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. ‘Doctor Bonham’s Case: Statutory Construction or Constitutional Theory’ (1969) 117 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 521‒545.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. Jr ‘The Expansion of American Administrative Law’ (1917) 30 Harvard Law Review 430‒448.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. ‘Constitutional Law and Politics’ (1987) 7 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 454‒464.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. ‘Dicey and the Reform of the Constitution’ [1985] Public Law 652‒78.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. ‘Western Europe’. In Butler, David and Ranney, Austin, eds. Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington DC: AEI Press, 1994, 24‒97.Google Scholar
Boudin, Louis B. ‘Lord Coke and the American Doctrine of Judicial Power’ (1929) 6 New York University Law Review 223‒246.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. ‘L’État et l’individu en Angleterre’. In Annales de l’École libre des sciences politiques. Paris: Germer Baillière, 1887, 485‒522.Google Scholar
Boyer, Allen Dillard. ‘“Understanding, Authority, and Will”: Sir Edward Coke and the Elizabethan Origins of Judicial Review’ (1997) 39 Boston College Law Review 43‒93.Google Scholar
Braun, Alexandra. ‘The English Codification Debate and the Role of Jurists in the Development of Legal Doctrines’. In Lobban, Michael and Moses, Julia, eds. The Impact of Ideas on Legal Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 204‒225.Google Scholar
Brink, David O. ‘Introduction’. In Dimova-Cookson, Maria and Mander, W. J., eds. T. H. Green’s Prolegomena to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brodrick, G .C. ‘A History of the University of Oxford: Oxford and Its Professors’ (Oct. 1889) 170:348 Edinburgh Review 303‒327.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. ‘American Judges’ (Nov. 1871–Apr. 1872) 25 Macmillan’s Magazine 422‒432.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. ‘The Legal Profession in America’ (Nov. 1871–Apr. 1872) 25 Macmillan’s Magazine 206‒217.Google Scholar
Buckland, C. E. Review of Law and Public Opinion (1915) 15 (n.s.) Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 266‒267.Google Scholar
Cassesse, Sabino. ‘Albert Venn Dicey e il diritto amministrativo’ (1990) 19 Quaderni Fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico modern 5‒82.Google Scholar
Chrimes, S. B. ‘The Constitutional Ideas of Dr. John Cowell’ (1949) 49 English Historical Review 461‒487.Google Scholar
Cilleuls, Alfred des. Commentaire sur Introduction à l’étude du droit constitutionnel par M. Dicey, Bulletin du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques, Section des Sciences économique et sociales, Année 1902. Paris: 1903.Google Scholar
Clark, E. C. ‘Jurisprudence; Its Use and Its Place in Legal Education’ (1885) 1 Law Quarterly Review 201‒206.Google Scholar
Cohn, Margit. ‘Medieval Chains, Invisible Inks: On Non-Statutory Powers of the Executive’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 97‒122.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. ‘The Establishment of Judicial Review’ (1910–11) 9 Michigan Law Review 102‒125.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. ‘The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law, Part II’ (1929) 42 Harvard Law Review 365‒409.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Richard. ‘Law’. In Van Arsdel, Rosemary T. and Vann, J. Don, eds. Victorian Periodicals and Victorian Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, 11‒21.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Richard. ‘The Reception of Analytic Jurisprudence: The Victorian Debate on the Separation of Law and Morality’ (1981) 74 Durham University Journal 50.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. ‘Dicey: Unitary, Self-Correcting Democracy and Public Law’ (1990) 106 Law Quarterly Review 105‒143.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’ [1997] Public Law 467‒487.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’ [1998] Public Law 63‒90.Google Scholar
Dickinson, H. T. ‘The Eighteenth-Century Debate on the Sovereignty of Parliament’ (1976) 26 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 189‒210.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. ‘Objective Law. III’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 126‒143; ‘Objective Law. IV’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 242‒256.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. ‘English Jurisprudence between Austin and Hart’ (2005) 91 Virginia Law Review 1‒91.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey’ (2011) 24 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 411‒430.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Compulsion of Legality’. In Ramraj, Victor, ed. Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 33‒59.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Form and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review’. In Forsyth, Christopher, ed. Judicial Review and the Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000, 279‒307.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Geneology of Legal Positivism’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 39‒67.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law’ (2001) 20 Law and Philosophy 461‒498.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Hobbes’s Constitutional Theory’. In Shapiro, Ian, ed. Leviathan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010, 453‒480.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Hobbes on the Authority of Law’. In Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas, eds. Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 186‒209.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘How Hobbes Met the “Hobbes Challenge”’ (2009) 72 Modern Law Review 488‒506.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’. In Taggart, Michael, ed. The Province of Administrative Law. Oxford: Hart, 1997, 279‒307.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘The Puzzle of Martial Law’ (2009) 59 University of Toronto Law Journal 1‒64.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency inside or outside the Legal Order?’ (2006) 27 Cardozo Law Review 2005‒2039.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Ludwik. ‘Comparative Public Law and the Fundamentals of Its Study’ (1921) 21 Columbia Law Review 623‒646.Google Scholar
Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Constitution’ (2009) 22 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 267‒290.Google Scholar
Elton, Charles. Review of Law of the Constitution (3 Apr. 1886) 726 The Academy 229‒230.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. ‘Was Entick v. Carrington a Landmark?’ In Tomkins, Adam and Scott, Paul, eds. Entick v. Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Errera, Roger. ‘Dicey and French Administrative Law: A Missed Encounter?’ [1985] Public Law 695‒707.Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. ‘The Law and the Constitution: Manifesto of the Progressive Party’ (2004) 67 Modern Law Review 734‒752.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale. ‘The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 210‒239.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix. ‘The Task of Administrative Law’ (1927) 75 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 614‒621.Google Scholar
Friedmann, W. ‘French Administrative Law and the Common-Law World’ (1955) 11 University of Toronto Law Journal 143‒147.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Ralph F. ‘Concepts and Policies in Anglo-American Administrative Law Theory’ (1938) 47 Yale Law Journal 538‒576.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick. ‘A Concept of Legal Tradition’ (2008) 34 Queen’s Law Journal 427‒445.Google Scholar
Goebel, Julius Jr. ‘Constitutional History and Constitutional Law’ (1938) 38 Columbia Law Review 555‒577.Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. ‘The Self-Destruction of Legal Positivism’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 449‒486.Google Scholar
Goodare, Julian. ‘The Estates in the Scottish Parliament, 1286‒1707’ (1996) 15 Parliamentary History 11‒32.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Arthur L. ‘English Contributions to the Philosophy of Law’ (1948) 48 Columbia Law Review 671‒688.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Arthur L. ‘Introduction’. In Sir Frederick Pollock, Jurisprudence and Legal Essays. London: Macmillan & Co., 1963.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Arthur L. ‘The Rule of Law and Absolute Sovereignty’ (1958) 106 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 943‒963.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. ‘The Executive and the Courts’ (1886) 1 Political Science Quarterly 533‒559.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Frank J. ‘The Writ of Certiorari’ (1891) 6 Political Science Quarterly 493‒536.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. M. ‘The Relation of Facts to Jurisdiction’ (1929) 45 Law Quarterly Review 459‒493.Google Scholar
Grant, James A. ‘The Ideals of the Rule of Law’ (2017) 37 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 383‒405.Google Scholar
Gray, Charles M. ‘Bonham’s Case Reviewed’ (1972) 116 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 35‒58.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. ‘Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation’ [1879‒1880]. In Nettleship, R. L., ed. Works of Thomas Hill Green. Volume 2: Philosophical Works. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1886, 335‒552.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren. ‘Extra-legality and the Ethic of Political Responsibility’ In Ramraj, Victor, ed. Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 61‒93.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren. ‘Stability and Flexibility: A Dicey Business’. In Ramraj, Victor, Hor, Michael, and Roach, Kent, eds. Global Anti-terrorism Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 90‒106.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, and Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní, Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hahn, Erich. ‘Rudolph Gneist and the Prussian Rechtsstaat: 1862‒78’ (1977) 49 (Supp.) Journal of Modern History D1361‒D1381.Google Scholar
Haldane, R. B. (Viscount of Cloan), ‘The Constitutional Evolution of the Civil Service’ (1923) 2 Journal of Public Administration 9‒22.Google Scholar
Hall, Hugh. ‘Jurisprudence’. In Stedman, A. M. M., ed. Oxford: Its Life and Schools. London: George Bell & Sons, 1887, 266‒296.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip A. ‘Revolution and Judicial Review: Chief Justice Holt’s Opinion in City of London v. Wood’ (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review 2091‒2153.Google Scholar
Hand, G. J. ‘A. V. Dicey’s Unpublished Materials on the Comparative Study of Constitutions’. In Hand, G. J. and McBride, J., eds. Droit sans Frontières: Essays in Honour of L. Neville Brown. Birmingham: Holdsworth Club, 1991, 77‒92.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol. ‘Disposing of Dicey: From Legal Autonomy to Constitutional Discourse’ (2000) 48 Political Studies 356‒369.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Holmes’ Common Law’ (17 Oct. 1963) 1:4 New York Review of Books 15‒16.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593‒629.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. Burnett. ‘The Rule of Law in Historical Perspective’ (1961) 59 Michigan Law Review 487‒500.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frederic. “The English School of Jurisprudence. Part I. Austin and Maine on Sovereignty” (1878) 24 The Fortnightly Review 479.Google Scholar
Harrison, Frederic. Review of Lectures on the Law of the Constitution by A. V. Dicey (1885) 1 Law Quarterly Review 502‒505.Google Scholar
Harvie, Christopher. ‘Ideology and Home Rule: James Bryce, A. V. Dicey and Ireland, 1880‒1887’ (1976) 91 English Historical Review 298‒314.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H. ‘Bonham’s Case, Judicial Review, and the Law of Nature’ (2009) 1 Journal of Legal Analysis 325‒354.Google Scholar
Henderson, James Youngblood. ‘The Doctrine of Aboriginal Rights in Western Legal Tradition’. In Boldt, Menno and Long, J. Anthony, eds. The Quest for Justice: Aboriginal Peoples and Aboriginal Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985, 185‒220.Google Scholar
Ilbert, C. P. ‘Sir James Stephen as a Legislator’ (1894) 10 Law Quarterly Review 222‒227.Google Scholar
Innes, Joanna. ‘Legislating for Three Kingdoms: How the Westminster Parliament Legislated for England, Scotland and Ireland, 1707‒1830’. In Hoppit, Julian, ed. Parliaments, Nations and Identities in Britain and Ireland, 1660‒1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003, 15‒47.Google Scholar
Jacquelin, René. ‘L’Évolution de la procédure administrative’. In Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et à l’étranger. Volume 1. 1903, 373‒447.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Louis L., and Henderson, Edith G.. ‘Judicial Review and the Rule of Law: Historical Origins’ (1956) 72 Law Quarterly Review 345‒364.Google Scholar
[James, Edward, and Stephen, James Fitzjames]. ‘Case and Joint Opinion of Mr. Edward James, Q. C., and Mr. Fitzjames Stephen, Q. C., on Martial Law, with Reference to the Jamaica Insurrection’. In Forsyth, William, ed. Cases and Opinions on Constitutional Law and Various Points of English Jurisprudence, 1866. London: Stevens & Haynes, 1869, 551‒563.Google Scholar
Jenks, Edward. ‘The Prerogative Writs in English Law’ (1923) 32 Yale Law Journal 523‒534.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, H. ‘Remarks on Certain Points in Mr. Dicey’s “Law of the Constitution”’ (1887) 3 Law Quarterly Review 204‒210.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. ‘Administrative Law and Administrative Jurisdiction’ (1938) 20 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 99‒104.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. ‘Courts and Administrative Law: The Experience of English Housing Legislation’ (1936) 49 Harvard Law Review 426‒454.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor. Review of The Law of the Constitution, 9th ed., by Dicey, A. V. (1940) 3 Modern Law Review 321‒322.Google Scholar
Jones, Harry W. ‘The Rule of Law and the Welfare State’ (1958) 58 Columbia Law Review 143‒156.Google Scholar
Jordan, Donald. ‘The Irish National League and the “Unwritten Law”: Rural Protest and Nation-Building in Ireland 1882‒1890’ (Feb. 1998) 158 Past & Present 146‒171.Google Scholar
Jowell, Jeffrey. ‘The Rule of Law’. In Jowell, Jeffrey, Oliver, Dawn, and O’Cinneide, Colm, eds. The Changing Constitution, 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 13‒37.Google Scholar
Kirby, James. ‘A. V. Dicey and English Constitutionalism’ (2019) 45 History of European Ideas 33‒46.Google Scholar
Lakin, Stuart. ‘Debunking the Idea of Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Controlling Factor of Legality in the British Constitution’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 709‒734.Google Scholar
La Nauze, J. A. ‘Hearn and the “Government of England”’ (1967) 26 Australian Journal of Public Administration 303‒310.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold. ‘The Responsibility of the State in England’ (1919) 32 Harvard Law Review 447‒472.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. ‘“Office Is a Thing Borrowed”: Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government’ (2013) 41 Political Theory 409‒440.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel. ‘Unmaking Law: Jean Bodin on Law, Equity, and Legal Change’ (2018) 39 History of Political Thought 269‒296.Google Scholar
Lefcowitz, Allan B., and Lefcowitz, Barbara F.. ‘James Bryce’s First Visit to America: The New England Sections of His 1870 Journal and Related Correspondence’ (June 1977) 50:2 New England Quarterly 314‒331.Google Scholar
Lester, Anthony. ‘Fundamental Rights in the United Kingdom: The Law and the British Constitution’ (1976) 125 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 337‒363.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. ‘The English Civilians, 1500‒1750’. In Prest, Wilfrid, ed. Lawyers in Early Modern Europe and America. London: Croom Helm, 1981, 108‒128.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. ‘Law and Ideology: The Civil Law and Theories of Absolutism in Elizabethan and Jacobean England’. In Dubrow, Heather and Strier, Richard, eds. The Historical Renaissance: New Essays on Tudor and Stuart Literature and Culture. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1988, 220‒241.Google Scholar
Lewans, Matthew. ‘Rethinking the Diceyan Dialectic’ (2008) 58 University of Toronto Law Journal 75‒104.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. Underwood. ‘Sir Edward Coke (1552‒1633): His Theory of “Artificial Reason” as a Construct for Modern Basic Legal Theory’ (1968) 84 Law Quarterly Review 330‒342.Google Scholar
Little, Gavin. ‘Scotland and Parliamentary Sovereignty’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies 540‒567.Google Scholar
Lindsay, A. D. ‘Sovereignty’ (1924) 24 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 235‒254.Google Scholar
Lino, Dylan. ‘Albert Venn Dicey and the Constitutional Theory of Empire’ (2016) 36 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 751‒780.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael. ‘Was There a Nineteenth Century “English School of Jurisprudence”?’ (1995) 16 Journal of Legal History 34‒62.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. ‘Constituent Power Subverted: From English Constitutional Argument to British Constitutional Practice’ in Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil, eds. The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, 27‒48.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. ‘Representation and Constitutional Theory’. In Craig, Paul and Rawlings, Richard, eds. Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, 47‒66.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, and Tierney, Stephen, ‘The Shibboleth of Sovereignty’ (2018) 81 Modern Law Review 989‒1016.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. P. ‘Albert Venn Dicey’ (Apr. 1922) 17:310 Working Men’s College Journal 223‒224.Google Scholar
Lucas, W. W. ‘Immunity of the Crown from Mandamus’ (1909) 25 Law Quarterly Review 290‒296.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. ‘Does the United Kingdom have a Constitution? Reflections on MacCormick v. Lord Advocate’ (1978) 29 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 1‒20.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. ‘Jurisprudence and the Constitution’ (1983) 36 Current Legal Problems 13‒30.Google Scholar
MacKay, R. A. ‘Coke – Parliamentary Sovereignty or the Rule of Law?’ (1924) 22 Michigan Law Review 215‒247.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. ‘Why the History of English Law Is Not Written’ [1888]. In Fisher, H. A. L., ed. The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911, 480‒497.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. ‘William Stubbs, Bishop of Oxford’ (July 1901) 16:63 English Historical Review 417‒426.Google Scholar
Markby, W. ‘Analytical Jurisprudence’ (Aug. 1876) 1 (5th ser.) Law Magazine and Review 624‒30.Google Scholar
McDowell, Gary L. ‘Coke, Corwin and the Constitution: The “Higher Law Background” Reconsidered’ (1993) 55 Review of Politics 393‒420.Google Scholar
McGarry, John. ‘The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty’ (2012) 32 Legal Studies 577‒599.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., and Taylor, M. W., ‘Liberalism and the Referendum in British Political Thought 1890–1914’ (1990) 1 Twentieth Century British History 37‒45.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. ‘Austin on Jurisprudence’, Edinburgh Review (Oct. 1863). Reprinted in John Stuart Mill, Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical and Historical. Volume 3. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1867, 206‒274.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. ‘Whewell on Moral Philosophy’ (1852). In Robson, John M., ed. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: Volume X – Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society (Utilitarianism). Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985, 167‒202.Google Scholar
Mitchell, James. ‘Re-inventing the Union: Dicey, Devolution, and the Union’. In Miller, William L., ed. Anglo-Scottish Relations, from 1900 to Devolution and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 35‒49.Google Scholar
Morrison, Trevor W. ‘Suspension and the Extrajudicial Constitution’ (2007) 107 Columbia Law Review 1533‒1616.Google Scholar
Müller, Frank Lorenz. ‘Before “The West”: Rudolf von Gneist’s English Utopia’. In Bavaj, Riccardo and Steber, Martina, eds. Germany and ‘the West’: The History of a Modern Concept. New York: Berghahn Books, 2015, 152‒166.Google Scholar
Newman, Warren J. ‘The Principles of the Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty in Constitutional Theory and Litigation’ (2005) 17 National Journal of Constitutional Law 175‒296.Google Scholar
Orth, John V. ‘Did Sir Edward Coke Mean What He Said?’ (1999) 16 Constitutional Commentary 33‒38.Google Scholar
Parker, Edmund M. Review of Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. (1909) 3 American Political Science Review 362‒370.Google Scholar
Parker, Edmund M. ‘State and Official Liability’ (1906) 19 Harvard Law Review 335‒349.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood ‘Constitutional Conventions: Dicey’s Predecessors’ (1966) 29 Modern Law Review 137‒148.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood ‘Dicey’s Law of the Constitution: A Personal View’ [1985] Public Law 587‒595.Google Scholar
Plucknett, Theodore F. T. ‘Bonham’s Case and Judicial Review’ (1926) 40 Harvard Law Review 30‒70.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick. ‘Dicey on the Conflict of Laws’ (3 Oct. 1896) The Spectator 17‒19.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick. ‘The History of the Science of Politics – IV’. (1 Jan. to 1 June 1883) 33 (new ser.) Fortnightly Review 83‒99.Google Scholar
Poole, Thomas. ‘Judicial Review at the Margins: Law, Power, and Prerogative’ (2010) 60 University of Toronto Law Journal 81‒108.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. ‘The Scope and Purpose of Sociological Jurisprudence’ (1911‒1912) 25 Harvard Law Review 489‒516.Google Scholar
Prosser, Tony. ‘Understanding the British Constitution’ (1996) 44 Political Studies 473‒487.Google Scholar
Prothero, G. W. ‘Gneist on the English Constitution’ (1888) 3 English Historical Review 1‒33.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. ‘A. V. Dicey: The Referendum as the People’s Veto’ (1999) 20 History of Political Thought 531‒546.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’ (1980) 77 Journal of Philosophy 515‒572.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. ‘Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics’ (1951) 60 Philosophical Review 177‒197.Google Scholar
Risk, R. C. B. ‘A. H. F. Lefroy: Common Law Thought in Late Nineteenth-Century Canada: On Burying One’s Grandfather’ (1991) 41 University of Toronto Law Journal 307‒331.Google Scholar
Ritchie, David G. ‘On the Conception of Sovereignty’ (1891) 1 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 385‒411.Google Scholar
Robson, William A. ‘Dicey’s Law of the Constitution: A Review’ (1939) 38 Michigan Law Review 205‒207.Google Scholar
Robson, William A. ‘The Report of the Committee on Ministers’ Powers’ (1932) 3 Political Quarterly 346‒364.Google Scholar
Rumple, Wilfrid. ‘John Austin and His Nineteenth Century Critics: The Case of Sir Henry Maine’ (1988) 39 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 119‒149.Google Scholar
Sait, Edward McChesney. Review of Law of the Constitution, 9th ed. (1941) 46 American Historical Review 399‒400.Google Scholar
Salmond, John W. ‘The Names and Nature of the Law’ (1899) 6 Law Quarterly Review 367‒377.Google Scholar
Santoro, Emilio. ‘The Rule of Law and the “Liberties of the English”: The Interpretation of Albert Venn Dicey’. In Costa, Pietro and Zolo, Danilo, eds. The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007, 153‒199.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, David. ‘A. V. Dicey, Lord Watson, and the Law of the Canadian Constitution in the Late Nineteenth Century’ (1998) 16 Law and History Review 495‒526.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. ‘Jeremy Bentham and Nineteenth-Century English Jurisprudence’ (1991) 12 Journal of Legal History 58‒88.Google Scholar
Sir Sedley, Stephen. ‘Foreword’. In Taggart, Michael, ed. The Province of Administrative Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997, vii‒viii.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. N. ‘Political Theory and the Rule of Law’. In Hutchinson, A. C. and Monahan, Patrick, eds. The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology. Toronto: Carswell, 1987, 1‒16.Google Scholar
Simard, Augustin. ‘Tocqueville, Dicey et le “problème” du droit administratif’ (2017) 38 Tocqueville Review 271‒298.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B. ‘The Common Law and Legal Theory’. In Simpson, A. W. B., ed. Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, second series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973, 77‒99.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B. ‘The Rise and Fall of the Legal Treatise: Legal Principles and the Forms of Legal Literature’ (1981) 48 University of Chicago Law Review 632‒679.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. ‘A Genealogy of the Modern State’ (2009) 162 Proceedings of the British Academy 325‒370.Google Scholar
II Smith, George P. ‘Dr. Bonham’s Case and the Modern Significance of Lord Coke’s Influence’ (1966) 41 Washington Law Review 297‒314.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. de ‘The Limits of Judicial Review: Statutory Discretions and the Doctrine of Ultra Vires’ (1948) 11 Modern Law Review 306‒325.Google Scholar
Smith, S. A. de ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty Unmasked – Mr. Pickin Changes Trains’ (1973) 32 Cambridge Law Journal 8‒10.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Julia. ‘Dicey and His Legacy’ (1995) 16 History of Political Thought 234‒256.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. ‘The Appeal by Way of Case Stated from the Determinations of General Commissioners of Income Tax: An Historical Perspective’ (1996) British Tax Review 611‒618.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. ‘Bureaucratic Adjudication: The Internal Appeals of the Inland Revenue’. In Brand, Paul and Getzler, Joshua, eds. Judges and Judging in the History of the Common Law and Civil Law: From Antiquity to Modern Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 157‒174.Google Scholar
Stebbings, Chantal. ‘The General Commissioners of Income Tax: Assessors or Adjudicators?’ (1993) British Tax Review 52‒64.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. ‘Biographical Notice of Sir James Stephen’. In Sir Stephen, James, Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography, 4th ed. London: Longman, Green, Longman and Roberts, 1860, xi‒xvii.Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. ‘English Jurisprudence’, Review of The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, 2nd ed. by Austin, John, and Ancient Law by Henry Sumner Maine (Oct. 1861) 114:232 Edinburgh Review 456‒486.Google Scholar
Sir Stephen, James. ‘Colonization as a Branch of Social Economy’ (13 Oct. 1858). In Knaplund, James Stephen and the British Colonial System, 281‒298.Google Scholar
Strahan, J. A. ‘Lord Bryce: Personal Recollections’ (1922) 38 Law Quarterly Review 235‒239.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘From Legal Biography to Legal Life Writing: Broadening Conceptions of Legal History and Socio-Legal Scholarship’ (2015) 42 Journal of Law and Society 7‒36.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘The Legal Boundaries of Liberty: Dicey, Liberalism and Legal Science’ (1983) 46 Modern Law Review 102‒111.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘Legal Theory, the Common Law Mind and the Making of the Textbook Tradition’. In Twinning, W., ed. Legal Theory and Common Law. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986, 26‒61.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. ‘Making Respected Gentlemen out of Law Professors: A Commentary on Albert Venn Dicey, Can English Law Be Taught at the Universities (1883)’. In Kultur ind Beruf in Europa. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2012, 161‒168.Google Scholar
Sykes, John G. W. “II – Jurisprudence: A Review” (1875) 4 Law Magazine and Review 491‒492.Google Scholar
Tener, Robert H. ‘The Spectator Records, 1874‒1897’ (Spring 1960) 17 The Victorian Newsletter 33‒36.Google Scholar
Thorburn, Malcolm. ‘Justifications, Powers, and Authority’ (2008) 117 Yale Law Journal 1070‒1130.Google Scholar
Touster, Saul. ‘Holmes a Hundred Years Ago: The Common Law and Legal Theory’ (1981‒1982) 10 Hofstra Law Review 673‒717.Google Scholar
Twining, William. ‘R. G. Collingwood’s Autobiography: One Reader’s Response’ (1998) 25 Journal of Law and Society 603‒620.Google Scholar
Tyler, Amanda L. ‘Suspension as an Emergency Power’ (2009) 118 Yale Law Journal 600‒694.Google Scholar
Vinogradoff, Paul. ‘The Teaching of Sir Henry Maine’ (1904) 20 Law Quarterly Review 119‒133.Google Scholar
Wade, E. C. S. ‘Preface’ and ‘Introduction’. In Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 9th ed. London: Macmillan & Co., 1939.Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R. ‘The Basis of Legal Sovereignty’ (1955) 13 Cambridge Law Journal 172‒197.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. ‘Are Constitutional Norms Legal Norms?’ (2006) 75 Fordham Law Review 1697‒1713.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Deliberating about Constitutionalism’. In Kong, Hoi, Levy, Ron, Orr, Graeme, and King, Jeff eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 167‒180.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Dicey on Writing the Law of the Constitution’ (2012) 32 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21‒49.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Judicial Review of Ministerial Advice to the Crown’ (2016) 25 Constitutional Forum 33‒42.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘The Law behind the Conventions of the Constitution: Reassessing the Prorogation Debate’ (2011) 5 Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law 131‒154.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Legal Humanism and Law as Integrity’ (2008) 67 Cambridge Law Journal 352‒375.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Respecting Deference as Respect: Rights, Reasonableness and Proportionality in Canadian Administrative Law’. In Elliott, Mark and Wilberg, Hanna, eds. The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015, 395‒422.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘Toward the Unity of Constitutional Value – or, How to Capture a Pluralistic Hedgehog’ (2017) 63 McGill Law Journal 1‒21.Google Scholar
Walters, Mark D. ‘The Unwritten Constitution as a Legal Concept’. In Dyzenhaus, David and Thorburn, Malcolm, eds. The Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 33‒52.Google Scholar
Watt, Horatia Muir. ‘Theorizing Private International Law’. In Orford, Anne, Hoffmann, Florian, and Clark, Martin, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 862‒881.Google Scholar
Westlake, John. Review of Conflict of Laws by A. V. Dicey (1896) 12 Law Quarterly Review 397‒401.Google Scholar
Williams, Ian. ‘Dr. Bonham’s Case and “Void” Statutes’ (2006) 27 Journal of Legal History 111‒128.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. ‘The Study of Administration’ (1887) 2 Political Science Quarterly 197‒222.Google Scholar
Youngblood Henderson, James. ‘The Doctrine of Aboriginal Rights in Western Legal Tradition’. In Boldt, Menno and Long, J. Anthony, eds. The Quest for Justice: Aboriginal Peoples and Aboriginal Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985, 185‒220.Google Scholar