Ahlfors, L. V., Complex analysis: An introduction to the theory of analytic functions of one complex variable, 3rd ed. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1978.Google Scholar

Anshel, I. and Goldfeld, D., Calculus a computer algebra approach, International Press, Boston, 1996.Google Scholar

Atiyah, M. F. and Macdonald, I. G., Introduction to commutative algebra, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.-London-Don Mills, Ont., 1969.Google Scholar

Atkin, A. O. L. and Lehner, J., Hecke operators on Γ0(m), Math. Ann. 185 (1970), 134–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badulescu, I. A. and Renard, D., Unitary dual of GL(n) at Archimedean places and global Jacquet-Langlands correspondence, preprint available at: arxiv.org/pdf/0905.4143.

Baruch, E. M., A proof of Kirillov's conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2) 158 (2003), no. 1, 207–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, H., Lazard, M. and Serre, J.-P., Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1964), 385–392.

Bass, H., Milnor, J. and Serre, J.-P., Solution of the congruence subgroup problem for SLn (n ≥ 3) and Sp2n (n ≥ 2), Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. No. 33, (1967), 59–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, J. N., All reductive p-adic groups are of type I, (Russian) Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozen. 8 (1974), no. 2, 3–6.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. N., P-invariant distributions on GL(N) and the classification of unitary representations of GL(N) (non-Archimedean case), Lie group representations, II (College Park, Md., 1982/1983), 50–102, Lecture Notes in Math., 1041, Springer, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. N. and Gelbart, S. (Editors), An Introduction to the Langlands Program, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2003.Google Scholar

Bernstein, I. N. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Representations of the group GL(n,F), where F is a local non-Archimedean field, (Russian) Uspehi Mat. Nauk 31 (1976), no. 3(189), 5–70.Google Scholar

Bernstein, I. N. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups. 1, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 10 (1977), no. 4, 441–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borel, A., Introduction to automorphic forms, Algebraic Groups and Discontinuous Subgroups (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Boulder, Colo., 1965), pp. 199–210, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borel, A., Automorphic L-functions, in Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 2, pp. 27–61, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1979.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N., Integration I, Chapters 1–6. Translated from the 1959, 1965 and 1967 French originals by Sterling K. Berberian, Elements of Mathematics (Berlin), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bump, D., Automorphic forms and representations, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 55, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar

Bushnell, C. J. and Kutzko, P. C., The admissible dual of GL(N) via compact open subgroups, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 129, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993.Google Scholar

Casselman, W., Introduction to the theory of admissible representations of p-adic reductive groups, unpublished lecture notes, available at http://www.math.ubc.ca/~cass/research.html.

Casselman, W.On some results of Atkin and Lehner, Math. Ann. 201 (1973), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassels, J. W. S., Local fields, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clozel, L., Progrès récents vers la classification du dual unitaire des groupes réductifs réels, Séminaire Bourbaki, Vol. 1986/87. Astèrisque No. 152–153 (1987), 5, 229–252 (1988).Google Scholar

Cogdell, J. W., L-functions and converse theorems for GLn, in Automorphic Forms and Applications (edited by Sarnak, Shahidi), IAS/Park Cith Mathematics Series, Vol 12, 2002.Google Scholar

Davenport, H., Multiplicative number theory, Third edition. Revised and with a preface by Hugh L., Montgomery, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 74. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.Google Scholar

Deligne, P., Formes modulaires et représentations l-adiques, Séminaire Bourbaki vol. 1968/69 Exposés 347–363, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 179, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1971.Google Scholar

Deligne, P., La conjecture de Weil. I, (French) Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. No. 43 (1974), 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichler, M., Allgemeine Kongruenzklasseneinteilungen der Idealen einfacher Algebren über algebraischen Zahlkörpern and ihrer L-Reihen, J., Reine Angew. Math., 179 (1938), 227–251.Google Scholar

Fesenko, I., Local reciprocity cycles. Invitation to higher local fields, (Mnster, 1999), 293–298 (electronic), Geom. Topol. Monogr., 3, Geom. Topol. Publ., Coventry, 2000.Google Scholar

Fesenko, I., Analysis on arithmetic schemes I. Kazuya Kato's fiftieth birthday, Doc. Math. (2003), Extra Vol., 261–284.Google Scholar

Fesenko, I., Adelic approach to the zeta function of arithmetic schemes in dimension two, Mosc. Math. J. 8 (2008), no. 2, 273–317, 399–400.Google Scholar

Flath, D., Decomposition of representations into tensor products, Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 1, pp. 179–183, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1979.Google Scholar

Fujisaki, G., On the zeta-functions of the simple algebra over the field of rational numbersJ. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo. Sect. I, 7 (1958), 567–604.Google Scholar

Fujisaki, G., On the L-functions of simple algebras over the field of rational numbersJ. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo. Sect. I, 9 (1962), 293–311.Google Scholar

Fulton, W. and Harris, J., Representation theory a first course, Graduate Texts in Math., vol. 129, Readings in Mathematics, Springer Verlag, New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Garrett, P. B., Holomorphic Hilbert modular forms, The Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Mathematics Series, Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, CA, 1990.Google Scholar

Gelfand, I. M., Spherical functions in symmetric Riemann spaces, (Russian) Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 70, (1950), 5–8.Google Scholar

Gelfand, I. M., Graev, M. I. and Pyatetskii-Shapiro, I. I., Representation theory and automorphic functions, Translated from the Russian by K. A., Hirsch. Reprint of the 1969 edition. Generalized Functions, 6. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1990.Google Scholar

Gelfand, I. M. and Kajdan, D. A., Representations of the group GL(n, K) where K is a local field, Lie groups and their representations (Proc. Summer School, Bolyai János Math. Soc., Budapest, 1971), pp. 95–118. Halsted, New York, 1975.Google Scholar

Godement, R., Les fonctions des algebres simples, I, II, Séminaire Bourbaki, 1958/1959, Exposé p. 171, 176.

Godement, R., Notes on Jacquet-Langlands theory, mimeographed notes, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, 1970.Google Scholar

Godement, R. and Jacquet, H., Zeta functions of simple algebras, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 260, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1972.Google Scholar

Goldfeld, D., Automorphic forms and L-functions for the group GL(n, ℝ), Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 99, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar

Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M., Table of integrals, series, and products, Translated from the Russian. Translation edited and with a preface by Alan, Jeffrey and Daniel, Zwillinger. Seventh edition, Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2007.Google Scholar

Gross, B. H. and Reeder, M., From Laplace to Langlands via representations of orthogonal groups, Bulletin of the AMS, Vol. 43, no. 2 (2006), 163–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halmos, P. R., Measure Theory, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York, NY, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harish-Chandra, , Discrete series for semisimple Lie groups, II, Explicit determination of the characters, Acta Math. 116 (1966), 1–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harish-Chandra, , Harmonic analysis on reductive p-adic groups, Notes by G., van Dijk. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 162. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hecke, E., Über die Bestimmung Dirichletscher Reihen durch ihre Funktionalgleichung, Math. Ann., 113 (1936), 664–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hecke, E., Über Modulfunktionen und die Dirichletschen Reihen mit Eulerscher Produktententwicklung, I, Math. Ann. 114 (1937), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hecke, E., Über Modulfunktionen und die Dirichletschen Reihen mit Eulerscher Produktententwicklung, II, Math. Ann. 114 (1937), 316–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hewitt, E. and Ross, K. A., Abstract harmonic analysis, Vol. I. Structure of topological groups, integration theory, group representations, Second edition, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften (Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences), 115 Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1979.Google Scholar

Hey, K., Analytische Zahlentheorie in System hyperkomplexer Zahlen, Diss., Hamburg, 1929.Google Scholar

Howe, R., The Fourier transform and germs of characters (case of Gln over a p-adic field), Math. Ann. 208 (1974), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howe, R. E., Some qualitative results on the representation theory of GLn over a p-adic field, Pacific J. Math. 73 (1977), no. 2, 479–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iwaniec, H., Spectral methods of automorphic forms, Second edition, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 53. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Revista Matemática Iberoamericana, Madrid, 2002.Google Scholar

Iwasawa, K., Some properties of (L)-groups, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Cambridge, Mass., (1950), vol. 2, pp. 447–450. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1952.Google Scholar

Iwasawa, K., Letter to J. Dieudonné, Zeta functions in geometry (Tokyo, 1990), 445–450, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., 21, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1992.Google Scholar

Jacquet, H., Fonctions de Whittaker associées aux groupes de Chevalley, (French) Bull. Soc. Math. France 95 (1967), 243–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquet, H., Representations des groupes linaires p-adiques, (French) Theory of group representations and Fourier analysis (Centro Internaz. Mat. Estivo (C.I.M.E.), II Ciclo, Montecatini Terme, 1970), pp. 119–220.Google Scholar

Jacquet, H., Sur les représentations des groupes réductifs p-adiques, (French. English summary) C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 280 (1975).Google Scholar

Jacquet, H., Principal L-functions of the linear group, Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 2, pp. 63–86, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1979.Google Scholar

Jacquet, H., Principal L-functions for GL(n), Representation theory and automorphic forms (Edinburgh, 1996), 321–329, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 61, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquet, H. and Langlands, R. P., Automorphic forms on GL(2), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 114. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1970.Google Scholar

Jacquet, H. and Shalika, J. A., On Euler products and the classification of automorphic forms, I, Amer. J. Math. 103(3) (1981), 499–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquet, H. and Shalika, J. A., On Euler products and the classification of automorphic forms, II, Amer. J. Math. 103(4) (1981), 777–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquet, H., Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. and Shalika, J. A., Automorphic forms on GL(3), I, Ann. of Math. (2), 109(1) (1979), 169–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquet, H., Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. and Shalika, J. A., Automorphic forms on GL(3), II, Ann. of Math. (2), 109(2), (1979) 213–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacquet, H., Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I. and Shalika, J. A., Conducteur des représentations du groupe linéaire, Math. Ann. 256 (1981), no. 2, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kato, K. and Saito, S., Global class field theory of arithmetic schemes, Contempr. Math., vol. 55, AMS, Providence, RI (1986), 255–331.Google Scholar

Kirillov, A. A., Infinite-dimensional unitary representations of a second-order matrix group with elements in a locally compact field, (Russian) Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 150 (1963), 740–743.Google Scholar

Kirillov, A. A., Classification of irreducible unitary representations of a group of second-order matrices with elements from a locally compact field, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 168 273–275 (Russian); translated as Soviet Math. Dokl. 7 (1966), 628–631.Google Scholar

Knapp, A. and Trapa, P. E., Representations of semisimple Lie groups, in Representation theory of Lie groups (Park City, UT, 1998), 7–87, IAS/Park City Math. Ser., 8, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000.Google Scholar

Knapp, A. W. and Vogan, D. A., Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, S., Real analysis, Second edition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program, Reading, MA, 1983.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. P., The work of Robert Langlands, http://publications.ias.edu/rpl/

Langlands, R. P., On the classification of irreducible representations of real algebraic groups, Representation theory and harmonic analysis on semisimple Lie groups, 101–170, Math. Surveys Monogr., 31, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laumon, G. and Ngô, B. C., Le lemme fondamental pour les groupes unitaires, Ann. of Math. (2) 168 (2008), no. 2, 477–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maass, H., Über eine neue Art von nicht analytischen automorphen Funktionen and die Bestimmung Dirichletscher Reihen lurch Funktionalgleichung, Math. Ann., 121 (1949), 141–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maass, H., Über automorphe Funktionen von mehreren Ver änderlichen und die Bestimmung von Dirichletschen Reihen durch Funktionalgleichungen, (German) Ber. Math.-Tagung Tübingen 1946 (1946), 100–102 (1947).Google Scholar

Maass, H., Die Differentialgleichungen in der Theorie der elliptischen Modulfunktionen, Math. Ann. 125 (1953), 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maass, H., Lectures on modular functions of one complex variable, Second edition, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Lectures on Mathematics and Physics, 29, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, 1983.Google Scholar

Magnus, W., Noneuclidean tesselations and their groups, Academic Press, New York, 1974.Google Scholar

Margulis, G. A., On the arithmeticity of discrete groups, Soviet Math. Dokl. 10 (1969), 900–902; translated from Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 187 (1969), 518–520 (Russian).Google Scholar

Margulis, G. A., Discrete subgroups of semisimple Lie groups, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], 17, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar

Mautner, F. I., Spherical functions over p-adic fields, I, Amer. J. Math. 80 (1958), 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mautner, F. I., Spherical functions over p-adic fields, II, Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mennicke, J. L., Finite factor groups of the unimodular group, Ann. of Math. (2) 81 (1965), 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miyake, T., On automorphic forms on GL2 and Hecke operators, Ann. of Math. (2) 94 (1971), 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miyake, T., Modular forms, Translated from the 1976 Japanese original by Yoshitaka Maeda. Reprint of the first 1989 English edition. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.Google Scholar

Moeglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Spectral decomposition and Eisenstein series, Une paraphrase de l'criture [A paraphrase of Scripture]. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 113, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar

Moy, A. and Sally, P. Jr., Supercuspidal representations of SLn over a p-adic field, Duke J. Math. 51 (1984), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, W., The mean square of Dirichlet series associated with automorphic forms, Monatsh. Math. 113 (1992), no. 2, 121–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munkres, J. R., Topology: a first course, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1975.Google Scholar

Murty, R. M., Introduction to p-adic analytic number theory, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 27, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; International Press, Somerville, MA, 2002.Google Scholar

Nachbin, L., The Haar integral, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., Princeton, NJ-Toronto-London, 1965.Google Scholar

Ngô, B. C., Le lemme fondamental pour les algebres de Lie, (2008), preprint available at: arxiv:0801.0446v3.

Osborne, M. S., On the Schwartz-Bruhat space and the Paley-Wiener theorem for locally compact abelian groups, J. Functional Analysis 19 (1975), 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parshin, A. N., On the arithmetic of two-dimensional schemes, I. Distributions and residues, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 40 (1976), no. 4, 736–773.Google Scholar

Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I., Euler subgroups. Lie groups and their representations, (Proc. Summer School, Bolyai Jnos Math. Soc., Budapest, 1971), pp. 597–620, Halsted, New York, 1975.Google Scholar

Prasad, D. and Raghuram, A., Representation theory of GL(n) over non-Archimedean local fields, School on Automorphic Forms on GL(n), 159–205, ICTP Lect. Notes, 21, Abdus Salam Int. Cent.Theoret. Phys., Trieste, 2008.Google Scholar

Raghunathan, M. S., The congruence subgroup problem, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 114 (2004), no. 4, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramanujan, S., On certain arithmetical functions, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, XXII, No. 9, (1916), 159–184.Google Scholar

Rankin, R. A., Diagonalizing Eisenstein series, I, Analytic number theory (Allerton Park, IL, 1989), 429–450, Progr. Math., 85, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rankin, R. A., Diagonalizing Eisenstein series, III, Discrete groups and geometry (Birmingham, 1991), 196–208, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 173, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rankin, R. A., Diagonalizing Eisenstein series, II, A tribute to Emil Grosswald: number theory and related analysis, 525–537, Contemp. Math., 143, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rankin, R. A., Diagonalizing Eisenstein series, IV, The Rademacher legacy to mathematics (University Park, PA, 1992), 107–118, Contemp. Math., 166, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riemann, B., Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebener Grösse, Monatsberichte der Berliner Akad, (Nov. 1859); Werke (2nd ed.), 145–153.Google Scholar

Rodier, F., Représentations de GL(n, k) où k est un corps p-adique, (French) [Representations of GL(n, k) where k is a p-adic field] Bourbaki Seminar, Vol. 1981/1982, pp. 201–218, Astérisque, 92–93, Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1982.Google Scholar

Roelcke, W., Das Eigenwertproblem der automorphen Formen in der hyperbolischen Ebene, I, II, (German) Math. Ann. 167 (1966), 292–337; ibid. 168 (1966), 261–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudin, W., Fourier analysis on groups, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 12 Interscience Publishers (a division of John Wiley and Sons), New York-London, 1962.Google Scholar

Sahi, S., A simple construction of Stein's complementary series representations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1990), no. 1, 257–266.Google Scholar

Sarnak, P., Selberg's eigenvalue conjecture, Notices of the AMS, Vol. 42, number 11, number 4 (1995), 1272–1277.Google Scholar

Selberg, A., Harmonic analysis and discontinuous groups in weakly symmetric Riemannian spaces with applications to Dirichlet series, J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 20 (1956), 47–87.Google Scholar

Selberg, A., On the estimation of Fourier coefficients of modular forms, 1965 Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. VIII pp. 1–15 Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.

Selberg, A., Collected papers. Vol. I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.Google Scholar

Selberg, A., Collected papers, Vol. II, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar

Serre, J.-P., Représentations Linéaires des Groupes Finis, 3rd Ed, Hermann, Paris, 1998.Google Scholar

Shalika, J. A., Representations of the two by two unimodular group over local fields, IAS notes (1966).

Shalika, J. A., On the multiplicity of the spectrum of the space of cusp forms of GLn, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), 454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shalika, J. A., The multiplicity one theorem for GL(n), Annals of Math. 100 (1974), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shimura, G., Arithmetic Theory of Automorphic Functions, Princeton Univ. Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Speh, B., Unitary representations of Gl(n, R) with nontrivial (g, K)-cohomology, Invent. Math. 71 (1983), no. 3, 443–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Springer, T. A., Linear Algebraic Groups, 2nd EdBirkhäuser, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, E. M., Analysis in matrix spaces and some new representations of SL (N, ℂ), Ann. of Math. (2) 86 (1967), 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tadić, M., Unitary representations of general linear group over real and complex field, preprint MPI/SFB85–22, Bonn, 1985.Google Scholar

Tadić, M., Classification of unitary representations in irreducible representations of general linear group (non-archimedean case), Ann. scient. Éc. Norm. Sup., 4 série, t. 19 (1986), 335–382.Google Scholar

Tadić, M., An external approach to unitary representations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 28 (1993), no. 2, 215–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tamagawa, T., On the ξ-functions of a division algebra, Ann. of Math. (2) 77 (1963), 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tate, J., Fourier analysis in number fields and Hecke's zeta function, Thesis, Princeton (1950), also appears in Algebraic Number Theory, edited by J.W., Cassels and A., Frohlich, Academic Press, New York, 1968, pp. 305–347.Google Scholar

Vogan, D. A. Jr., Gelfand-Kirillov dimension for Harish-Chandra modules, Invent. Math. 48 (1978), no. 1, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogan, D. A. Jr., The unitary dual of GL(n) over an Archimedean field, Invent. Math. 83 (1986), no. 3, 449–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallach, N. R., Real reductive groups, I, Pure and Applied Mathematics, 132. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988.Google Scholar

Wedderburn, J. H. M., On hypercomplex numbers, Proc. London Math. Soc. 6 (1907), 77–118.Google Scholar

Wedhorn, T., The local Langlands correspondence for GL(n) over p-adic fields, School on Automorphic Forms on GL(n), 237–320, ICTP Lect. Notes, 21, Abdus Salam Int. Cent.Theoret. Phys., Trieste, 2008.Google Scholar

Whittaker, E. T. and Watson, G. N., A Course in Modern Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Zelevinsky, A. V., Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups, II, On irreducible representations of GL(n), Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 13 (1980), no. 2, 165–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar