Ackerman, Bruce, We the People: Foundations (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Addis, Adeno, ‘Community and Jurisdictional Authority’, in Handl, Günther, Zekoll, Joachim and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012), 13–33.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities, revised edn. (London: Verso, 2006).Google Scholar

Anghie, Anthony, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (London: Penguin Books, 1963).Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Company, 1973).Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Was ist Politik? Fragmente aus dem Nachlaß, edited by Ludz, Ursula (München: Piper, 2003).Google Scholar

Arquilla, John and Ronfeldt, David (eds.), Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001).Google Scholar

Augenstein, Daniel, ‘Normative Fault-Lines of Transnational Human Rights Jurisprudence: National Pride and Religious Prejudice in the European Legal Space’, in Global Constitutionalism, 2 (2013) 3, 469–497.Google Scholar

Augenstein, Daniel, Global Business and the Law and Politics of Human Rights (Forthcoming, on file with the author).Google Scholar

Badie, Bernard, Un monde sans souverainité. Les États entre ruse et responsabilité (Paris: Fayard, 1999).Google Scholar

Barber, Benjamin, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Barlow, John Perry, ‘A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace’, available at: www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision website, www.bis.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt, Globalization: The Human Consequences (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt, ‘On Glocalization: Or Globalization for Some, Localization for Some Others’, in Thesis Eleven, 54 (1998), 37–49.Google Scholar

Bauman, Zygmunt, Liquid Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Baxi, Upendra, The Future of Human Rights, 3rd edn. (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Bedorf, Thomas, Verkennende Anerkennung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2010).Google Scholar

Benasayag, Miguel and Sztulwark, Diego, Du contre-pouvoir (Paris: La Decouverte, 2003).Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter, Passagen-Werk (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1983), vol. 1.Google Scholar

Berger, Klaus Peter, The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria, 2nd edn. (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar

Berman, Harold J., ‘World Law’, in Fordham International Law Journal, 18 (1995) 1617–1622.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, in Southern California Law Review, 80 (2007) 1155–1237.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bethlehem, Daniel, ‘The End of Geography: The Changing Nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law’, in European Journal of International Law, 25 (2014) 1, 9–24.Google Scholar

Bhuta, Nehal, ‘State Theory, State Order, State System – Jus Gentium and the Constitution of Public Power’, in Kadelbach, Stefan, Kleinlein, Thomas and Roth-Isigkeit, David (eds.), System, Order, and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 398–417.Google Scholar

Black, Julia, ‘Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, in Current Legal Problems, 54 (2001), 103–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumenberg, Hans, ‘Ordnungschwund und Selbsterhaltung: Über Weltverstehen und Weltverhalten im Werden der technische Epoche’, in Kuhn, H. and Wiedmann, F. (eds.), Das Problem der Ordnung. Verhandlungen des VI deutschen Kongresses für Philosophie (Meisenheim: Anton Hain Verlag, 1962), 37–57.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, Hans, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, translated by Robert Wallace (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Borges, Jorge Luis, ‘Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote’, translated by James E. Irby, available at: www.coldbacon.com/writing/borges-quixote.html (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Boutros-Ghali, Boutros, ‘Human Rights: The Common Language of Humanity’, Address at the opening of the World Conference on Human Rights at Vienna, Austria, on 14 June 1993, available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G93/142/39/PDF/G9314239.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed on 13 June 2016).Google Scholar

Boykoff, Jules, ‘Occupy Wall Street: Reclaiming Public Space, Reclaiming Dignity’, available at: www.commondreams.org/views/2011/10/12/occupy-wall-street-reclaiming-public-space-reclaiming-dignity (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Bratman, Michael, Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Bratman, Michael, Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Buber, Martin, Between Man and Man, translated by Roger Gregor Smith (New York, NY: Collier Books, 1965).Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas, ‘The Evolving International Human Rights System’, in The American Journal of International Law, 100 (2006) 4, 783–807.Google Scholar

Büthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter, The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Callies, Gralf-Peter and Zumbansen, Peer, Rough Consensus and Running Code (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar

Carens, Joseph, ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’, in The Review of Politics, 48 (1987), 251–273.Google Scholar

Casey, Edward, Getting Back into Place: For a Renewed Understanding of the Place World (Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel, The Power of Identity, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Chevallier, Jacques, ‘Mondialisation du droit ou droit de la mondialisation’, in Morand, Charles-Albert (ed.), Le droit saisi par la mondialisation (Brussels: Editions Bruylant, 2001), 37–61.Google Scholar

Chimni, Bhupinder S., ‘International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making’, in European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004) 1, 1–37.Google Scholar

Chimni, Bhupinder S., ‘Cooption and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law’, in New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 37 (2005), 799–828.Google Scholar

Chimni, Bhupinder S., ‘Global Administrative Law: Winners and Losers’, Manuscript available at: www.researchgate.net/publication/265196956_GLOBAL_ADMINISTRATIVE_LAW_WINNERS_AND_LOSERS (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Chinkin, Cristine, ‘A Critique of the Public/Private Distinction’, in European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999) 2, 387–395.Google Scholar

Choudhry, Sujit (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Christodoulidis, Emilios, ‘The Objection That Cannot Be Heard: Communication and Legitimacy in the Court Room’, in Duff, Antony, Farmer, Lindsey, Marshall, Sandra and Tadros, Victor (eds.), The Trial on Trial, Vol. 1: Truth and Due Process (Oxford: Hart Publishers, 2004), 179–202.Google Scholar

Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC) website, www.cleanclothes.org/about/who-we are (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Coalition for the International Criminal Court website: www.coalitionfortheicc.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Codex Alimentarius website: www.codexalimentarius.org/codex-home/en/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh, ‘Flipping Wreck: Lex Mercatoria on the Shoals of Ius Cogens’, in Grundmann, Stefan, Möslein, Florian and Riesenhuber, Karl (eds.), Contract Governance: Dimensions in Law and Interdisciplinary Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 383–406.Google Scholar

Colón-Ruiz, Joel, Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power (Milton Park: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Comité Maritime International website: http://comitemaritime.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Commaille, Jacques and Jobert, Bruno, Les métamorphoses de la régulation politique (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1998).Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, ‘Transnational Communities and the Concept of Law’, in Ratio Juris, 21 (2008) 1, 1–18.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, ‘Transnational Legal Authority: A Socio-Legal Perspective’, in Cotterrell, Roger and del Mar, Maksymilian (eds.), Authority in Transnational Legal Theory: Theorising across Disciplines (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), 253–279.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert, ‘Nomos and Narrative’, in Harvard Law Review, 97 (1983) 4, 4–68.Google Scholar

Crawford, James and Nevill, Penelope, ‘Relations between International Courts and Tribunals: The “Regime Problem”’, in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 235–260.Google Scholar

Culver, Keith and Giudice, Michael, Legality’s Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Culver, Keith and Giudice, Michael, ‘Claims to Authority, Legal Systems, and Dynamic Social Phenomena’, in Cotterrell, Roger and del Mar, Maksymilian (eds.), Authority in Transnational Legal Theory: Theorising across Disciplines (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), 49–74.Google Scholar

Cuniberti, Gilles, Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Approach. Text and Cases (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).Google Scholar

Cutler, A. Claire, Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Davis, Kevin E., Kingsbury, Benedict and Merry, Sally Engle, ‘Introduction: Global Governance by Indicators’, in Davis, Kevin E., Fisher, Angelina, Kingsbury, Benedict and Merry, Sally Engle (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 5–28.Google Scholar

Debord, Guy, La Société du Spectacle (Paris: Gallimard, 1967).Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne, ‘Developing Democracy beyond the State’, in Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 46 (2008) 221–266.Google Scholar

De Certeau, Michel, The Practice of Everyday Life, translated by Steven Rendall (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘Global Trade Law and the World Trade Organization’ (available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2605734) (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘The Fragmentation of International Trade Law’, in Journal of World Trade, 45 (2011) 1, 7–116.Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘Global Standard-Setting 2.0: How the WTO Puts a Spotlight on ISO and Impacts the Transnational Standard-Setting Process’, in Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 29 (2018) 2, 273–326.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Trois défis pour un droit mondial (Paris: Seuil, 1998).Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Le relative et l’universel (Paris: Seuil, 2004).Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World, translated by Naomi Norberg (Oxford: Hart Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Vers une communauté des valeurs? (Paris: Seuil, 2011).Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, L’écriture et la différence (Paris: Seuil, 1967).Google Scholar

Descartes, René, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), vols. I and II.Google Scholar

Dingwerth, Klaus and Pattberg, Philipp, ‘Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics’, in Global Governance, 12 (2006), 185–203.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack, ‘The Relative Universality of Human Rights’, in Human Rights Quarterly, 29 (2007) 2, 281–316.Google Scholar

Donovan, Donald Francis, ‘International Commercial Arbitration and Public Policy’, in New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 27 (1995), 645–657.Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael C. and Sabel, Charles F., ‘A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism’, in Columbia Law Journal, 98 (1998) 2, 267–473.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L., Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., ‘A New Approach to Regime Interaction’, in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 136–174.Google Scholar

Dussel, Enrique, Filosofía de la liberación (Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2014).Google Scholar

Du Toit, Louise, ‘Living Boundaries: An Ethics of the Interval’, available at: http://stias.ac.za/research/themes/crossing-borders/boundaries-and-legal-authority/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, ‘The Model of Rules’, in University of Chicago Law Review, 35 (1967) 14–46.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David, ‘Accountability and the Concept of (Global) Administrative Law’, in Acta Juridica, (2009), 3–31.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas (eds.), Law, Liberty and State: Oakeshott, Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David and Thorburn, Malcolm (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

eBay User Agreement, available at http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/user-agreement.html?rmvSB=true (last accessed on 15 March 2016).Google Scholar

Edel, Abraham, ‘Right and Good’, in Wiener, Philip P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas (New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973), vol. IV, 173–187.Google Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Lokhart, Nicolas L., ‘Standards of Review in WTO Law’, in Journal of International Economic Law, 7 (2003) 3, 491–525.Google Scholar

Elden, Stuart, The Birth of Territory (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Eslava, Luis, Local Space, Global Life: The Everyday Operation of International Law and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber), Lautsi and Others v. Italy, 18 March 2011.Google Scholar

European Court of Justice, Case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, 6 October 2015.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter, ‘Fighting Marginalization with Transnational Networks: Counter-Hegemonic Globalization’, in Contemporary Sociology, 29 (2000) 1, 230–241.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, ‘Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, in Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), 999–1046.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Viellechner, Lars, ‘Globaler Rechtspluralismus’, in Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, (2010), 34.Google Scholar

Ford, Richard T., ‘Law’s Territory (A History of Jurisdiction)’, in Michigan Law Review 97 (1999), 843–930.Google Scholar

Forest Stewardship Council webpage, https://us.fsc.org/mission-and-vision.187.htm (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, ‘Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias’, Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5 (1984), 46–49.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish, translated by Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage Books, 1995).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel, ‘La pensée du dehors’, in Critique, 229 (1996), 523–546.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Günter, ‘Constitutional Transfer: The IKEA Theory Revisited’, in International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (2010) 3, 563–579.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, translated by Joel Golb, James Ingram and Christiane Wilke (London: Verso, 2004).Google Scholar

Friedman-Rudovsky, Jean, ‘Return to Cochabamba: Eight Years Later, the Bolivian Water War Continues’, in Earth Island Journal: News of the World Environment, 23 (2008) 2, available online at: www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/eij/article/return_to_cochabamba/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics, translated by David E. Linge (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method, 2nd revised edn., translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall (London: Continuum, 2004).Google Scholar

Galgano, Francesco, ‘The New Lex Mercatoria’, in Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 2 (1995) 1, 99–110.Google Scholar

García Düttmann, Alexander, Between Cultures: Tensions in the Struggle for Recognition, translated by Kenneth B Woodgate (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Gilbert, Margaret, On Social Facts, 2nd edn. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Gilbert, Margaret, A Theory of Political Obligation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Gilbert, Margaret, Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, The World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York: Random House, 2001).Google Scholar

Glenn, H. Patrick, On Common Laws (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Goldman, Berthold, ‘Frontières du droit et lex mercatoria’, in Archives de philosophie du droit, 13 (1964), 177–192.Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond, History and Illusion in Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond, Philosophy and Real Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Goldoni, Marco, ‘Two Internal Critiques of Political Constitutionalism’, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10 (2012) 4, 926–949.Google Scholar

Goldoni, Marco and Wilkinson, Michael A., ‘The Material Constitution’, forthcoming in Modern Law Review, 81 (2018) 4 (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O., ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, in American Political Science Review, 99 (2005) 1, 29–43.Google Scholar

Guinier, Lani, ‘Beyond Electocracy: Rethinking the Political Representative as Powerful Stranger’, in Modern Law Review, 71 (2008), 1–35.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro (London: Heinemann, 1971).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, translated by Frederick Lawrence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, translated by William Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years’ Hindsight’, in Bohman, James (ed.), Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997), 113–154.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’, in Political Theory, 29 (2001) 6, 766–781, 774.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Postnational Constellation, translated by Max Pensky (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, translated by Ciaran Cronin and Pablo de Greiff (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Divided West, translated by Ciaran Cronin (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Hardin, Garret, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, in Science, 162 (1968), 1243–1248.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (New York: Penguin Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio, Commonwealth (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol, ‘Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values’, in European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006) 1, 187–214.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., ‘Are There any Natural Rights?’, in Philosophical Review, 64 (1955) 2, 175–191.Google Scholar

Harvey, David, The Condition of Postmodernity (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar

Harvey, David, The New Imperialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Harvey, David, Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development (London: Verso, 2006).Google Scholar

Hearse, Phil (ed.), Take the Power to Change the World: Globalisation and the Debate on Power (London: Socialist Revolution, 2007).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995 [1927]).Google Scholar

Held, David, ‘Cosmopolitanism: Taming Globalization’, excerpt reprinted in Held, David (ed.), The Global Transformations Reader, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002), 514–529.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, in Yale Law Journal, 107 (1997) 2, 273–391.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. and Donwoodie, Graeme B., ‘Designing Non-National Systems: The Case of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy’, in William and Mary Law Review, 43 (2001), 141–274.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, The Age of Rights (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, Mireille, Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (London: Penguin, 1985).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, The Citizen (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1991).Google Scholar

Holloway, John, Change the World without Taking Power: The Meaning of Revolution Today, 2nd edn. (London: Pluto Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, translated by Joel Anderson (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel, The I in We: Studies on the Theory of Recognition (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012), 137–152.Google Scholar

Hunter, Dan, ‘Cyberspace as Place and the Tragedy of the Digital Anticommons’, in California Law Review, 91 (2003) 2, 439–519.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, translated by David Carr (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, edited by Kern, Iso (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973).Google Scholar

Ihde, Don, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movement, Handbook on Some Political Issues surrounding Food and Agriculture in India, (2013), 70, available at: http://lvcsouthasia.blogspot.nl/p/blog-page.html (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

International Federation of Consulting Engineers website: http://fidic.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRSF) website: www.ifrs.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017)Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’, A/CN.4/L.702, 18 July 2006, 7. Available at: www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CN.4/L.702 (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

International Organization for Standardization website: www.iso.org/home.html (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

International Rivers Movement website: www.internationalrivers.org/campaigns/pak-mun-dam-0 (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Internet Engineering Task Force for the Adoption of Internet Standards website, www.ietf.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Janczuk-Gorywoda, Agnieszka, ‘Online Platforms as Providers of Transnational Payment Law’, in European Review of Private Law, 2 (2016), 223–252.Google Scholar

Jauss, Hans-Robert, Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, translated by Timothy Bahti (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Johns, Fleur, ‘Data, Detection and the Redistribution of the Sensible in International Law’, in American Journal of International Law, 111 (2017) 1, 57–103.Google Scholar

Johns, Fleur, ‘Data Territories: Changing Architectures of Association in International Law’, in Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 47 (2016), 107–129.Google Scholar

Johnson, David R. and Post, David, ‘Law and Borders, the Rise of Law in Cyberspace’, in Stanford Law Review, 48 (1995), 1367–1402.Google Scholar

Jullien, François, On the Universal, the Uniform, the Common and Dialogue between Cultures, translated by Michael Richardson and Krzysztof Fijalkowski (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, The Moral Law, translated by H. J. Paton (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

Karnataka State Farmers’ Association (KRRS) website: http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/indianfarmer.htm (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State, translated by Anders Wedberg (New York, NY: Russel & Russel, 1961).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine Staatslehre, reprinted (Vienna: Österreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1993).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory, 1st edn. of the Reine Rechtslehre, translated by Bonnie Litchewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State, translated by Anders Wedberg, with a new introduction by A. Javier Treviño (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?’, in European Human Rights Law Review, 3 (2001), reprinted in Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15 (2002), 101–125.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, ‘The Political Stakes in “Merely Technical” Issues of Contract Law’, in European Review of Private Law, 19 (2001) 1, 7–28.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., ‘Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations’, in World Politics, 27 (1974) 1, 39–62.Google Scholar

Khadse, Ashlesha and Bhattacharya, Niloshree, ‘India: A Conversation with Farmers of the KRRS’, www.viacampesina.org/downloads/pdf/openbooks/EN-05.pdf (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’, in European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009) 1, 23–57.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘International Law as Inter-Public Law’, in Richardson, Henry S. and Williams, Melissa S. (eds.), Moral Universalism and Pluralism, Nomos XLIX (New York, NY: New York University Press, 2009), 167–204.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Donaldson, Megan and Vallejo, Rodrigo, ‘Global Administrative Law and Deliberative Democracy’, in Orford, Anne and Hoffman, Florian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 526–542.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, in Law and Contemporary Problems, 68 (2005), 15–61.Google Scholar

Kinley, David, ‘Bendable Rules: The Development Implications of Human Rights Pluralism’, in Tamanaha, Brian, Sage, Caroline and Woolcock, Michael (eds.), Legal Pluralism and Development: Scholars and Practitioners in Dialogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 50–65.Google Scholar

Koops, Bert-Jaap and Goodwin, Morag, ‘Cyberspace, the Cloud, and Cross-Border Criminal Investigation: The Limits and Possibilities of International Law’, December 2014, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2698263.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’, in European Journal of International Relations, 15 (2003) 3, 395–422.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hegemonic Regimes’, in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 305–324.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in International Organization, 36 (1982) 2, 185–205.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich, ‘Global Governance and the Emergence of a World Society’, in Karagiannis, Nathalie and Wagner, Peter (eds.), Varieties of World-Making: Beyond Globalization (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2007), 266–283.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘Global Administrative Law and the Constitutional Ambition’, in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 245–266.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, ‘Authority, Solid and Liquid, in Postnational Governance’, in Cotterrell, Roger and del Mar, Maksymilian (eds.), Authority in Transnational Legal Theory: Theorising across Disciplines (Glos: Edward Elgar, 2016), 25–48.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’, in European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004) 5, 907–931.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, ‘The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Between Constitutional Triumphalism and Nostalgia’, in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 201–219.Google Scholar

Latimer, Jack (ed.), Friendship among Equals: Recollections from ISO’s First 50 Years (Geneva: ISO Central Secretariat, 1997), 17, available at: www.iso.org/iso/2012_friendship_among_equals.pdf (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Leader, Sheldon, ‘Trade and Human Rights II’, in Macrory, Patrick, Appleton, Arthur Edmond and Plummer, Michael C. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, Vol. II (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005), 663–696.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude, Democracy and Political Theory, translated by David Macey (Oxford: Polity Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A., ‘Place and Cyberspace’, in California Law Review, 91 (2003) 2, 521–542.Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence, ‘The Zones of Cyberspace’, in Stanford Law Review, 48 (1996), 1403–1411.Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence, Code: Version 2.0 (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Levi-Faur, David, ‘Regulation and Regulatory Governance’, in Levi-Faur, David (ed.), Handbook on the Politics of Regulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 3–21.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Inside and outside the EU’s “Area of Freedom, Security and Justice”: Reflexive Identity and the Unity of Legal Space’, in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 90 (2004) 4, 478–497.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Give and Take: Arendt and the Nomos of Political Community’, in Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32 (2006) 7, 881–901.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Democracy, Political Reflexivity and Bounded Dialogues: Reconsidering the Monism-Pluralism Debate’, in Christodoulidis, Emilios and Tierney, Stephen (eds.), Public Law and Politics: The Scope and Limits of Constitutionalism (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), 103–116.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘The Opening: Alegality and Political Agonism’, in Schaap, Andrew (ed.), Law and Agonistic Politics (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009), 57–70.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘A-Legality: Postnationalism and the Question of Legal Boundaries’, in Modern Law Review, 73 (2010) 1, 30–56.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Recognition as Domination: Constitutionalism, Reciprocity and the Problem of Singularity’, in Walker, Neil, Tierney, Stephen and Shaw, Jo (eds.), Europe’s Constitutional Mosaic (Oxford: Hart Publishers, 2011), 205–230.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘To Each Their Own Place? Immigration, Justice, and Political Reflexivity’, in Merle, Jean-Christoph (ed.), Spheres of Global Justice (Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media, 2013), vol. 1, 317–328.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Reply to Critics’, in Menga, Ferdinando (ed.), A Symposium on Hans Lindahl’s Fault Lines of Globalization, in Ethics and Politics: A Review of Philosophy, 16 (2014) 2, 1011. Available at: www2.units.it/etica/2014_2/LINDAHL.pdf (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Reply to Critics’, in Menga, Ferdinando, ‘ISO Standards and Authoritative Collective Action: Conceptual and Normative Issues’, in Delimatsis, Panagiotis (ed.), The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 42–57.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Reply to Critics’, in Menga, Ferdinando, ‘Law as Concrete Order: Schmitt and the Problem of Collective Freedom’, in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas (eds.), Law, Liberty and State: Oakeshott, Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 38–64.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Reply to Critics’, in Menga, Ferdinando, ‘Possibility, Actuality, Rupture: Constituent Power and the Ontology of Change’, in Constellations, 22 (2015) 2, 163–174.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Reply to Critics’, in Menga, Ferdinando, ‘Constituent Power and the Constitution’, in Dyzenhaus, David and Thorburn, Malcolm (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 141–160.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Reply to Critics’, in Menga, Ferdinando, ‘One Pillar: Legal Authority and a Social License to Operate in a Global Context’, in Augenstein, Daniel and Lindahl, Hans (eds.), Symposium on Global Human Rights and the Boundaries of Statehood, in Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 23 (2016) 1, 201–224.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans, ‘Reply to Critics’, in Menga, Ferdinando, ‘Review of Stuart Elden, The Birth of Territory’, in Political Theory, 44 (2016) 1, 144–146.Google Scholar

Livermore, Michael A., ‘Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and the Codex Alimentarius’, in New York University Law Review, 81 (2006), 766–801.Google Scholar

Lokashakti webpage: http://lokashakti.org/encyclopedia/groups/143-narmada-bachao-andolan (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin, Foundations of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin, ‘What Is Constitutionalisation?’, in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 47–69.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin, ‘Nomos’, in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas (eds.), Law, Liberty and State: Oakeshott, Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 65–95.Google Scholar

Lovink, Geert, Dark Fiber: Tracking Critical Internet Culture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl, Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter, ‘What Is a Hacktivist?’, New York Times, 13 January 2013, available at: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/what-is-a-hacktivist/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas, Law as a Social System, translated by Klaus A. Ziegert (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

‘Manifesto de la red de resistencia alternativa’ website: https://difusamente.wordpress.com/ 192010/11/04/manifiesto-de-la-red-de-resistencia-alternativa/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Markell, Patchen, Bound by Recognition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Marks, Susan, ‘Naming Global Administrative Law’, in New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 37 (2005), 995–1001.Google Scholar

Mbiti, John, African Religions and Philosophy (London: Heinemann, 1970).Google Scholar

Melgram, Pel, ‘Claims to Globalization: Thailand’s Assembly of the Poor and Multilevel Resistance to Capitalist Development’, in Resistance Studies Magazine, (2008) 2, 5–22.Google Scholar

Menga, Ferdinando, ‘The Seduction of Radical Democracy. Deconstructing Hannah Arendt’s Political Discourse’, in Constellations, 21 (2014) 3, 313–326.Google Scholar

Menga, Ferdinando, ‘Was sich der Globalisierung entzieht. Die unaufhebbare Kontingenz bei der Stiftung von Weltordnungen’, in Koch, Dietmar, Ruppert, Michael and Weidtmann, Niels (eds.), Globalisierung – Eine Welt? (Tübingen: Attempto-Verlag, 2015), 64–73.Google Scholar

Menga, Ferdinando, ‘How Much and What Kind of Radical Democracy Can a Community Withstand?’, in Gräb-Schmidt, Elisabeth and Menga, Ferdinando (eds.), Grenzgänge der Gemeinschaft (Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2016), 79–94.Google Scholar

Menga, Ferdinando, Ausdruck, Mitwelt, Ordnung. Zur Ursprünglichkeit einer Dimension des Politischen im Anschluss an die Philosophie des frühen Heidegger (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2018).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith (New York, NY: Humanities Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, L’œil et l’esprit (Paris: Gallimard, 1985).Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, ‘The True Lex Mercatoria: Law beyond the State’, in Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 14 (2007) 2, 447–468.Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, in Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5 (2009), 243–262.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank, ‘Constitutional Authorship’, in Alexander, Larry (ed.), Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 64–98.Google Scholar

Miller, David, On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Minkkinen, Panu, ‘Political Constitutionalism versus Political Constitutional Theory: Law, Power, and Politics’, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11 (2013) 3,585–610.Google Scholar

Molineaux, Charles, ‘Moving towards a Construction Lex Mercatoria – A Lex Constructionis’, in Journal of International Arbitration, 14 (1997) 1, 55–66.Google Scholar

Monbiot, George, ‘The Tragedy of Enclosure’, in Scientific American, January (1994), 140.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren, ‘Who’s Afraid of the Multitude? Between the Individual and the State’, in The South Atlantic Quarterly, 104 (2005) 4, 655–673.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal, On the Political (Abingdon: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal, Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically (London: Verso, 2013).Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, Human Rights and the Uses of History (London: Verso, 2014).Google Scholar

Murphy, Craig N., ‘Global Governance: Poorly Done and Poorly Understood’, in International Affairs, 76 (2000) 4, 789–803.Google Scholar

Mutua, Makua wa, ‘The Banjul Charter and the African Cultural Fingerprint: An Evaluation of the Language of Duties’, in Virginia Journal of International Law, 35 (1995), 339–380.Google Scholar

Mutua, Makua wa, ‘The Ideology of Human Rights’, in Virginia Journal of International Law, 36 (1996), 589–657.Google Scholar

Mutua, Makua wa, ‘What Is TWAIL?’, in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, (2000) 31–38.Google Scholar

Mutua, Makua wa, ‘Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights’, in Harvard International Law Journal, 42 (2001) 1, 201–245.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio, The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics, translated by Michael Hardt (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio, Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Neves, Marcelo, Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: Eine theoretische Betrachtung und eine Interpretation des Falls Brasilien (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1992).Google Scholar

Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Shaffer, Gregory, ‘Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government’, in Law and Contemporary Problems, 68 (2005) 3–4, 263–317.Google Scholar

Notes from Nowhere (eds.), We Are Everywhere: The Irresistible Rise of Global Anticapitalism (London: Verso, 2003).Google Scholar

Nouwen, Sarah M. H., Complementarity in the Line of Fire: The Catalysing Effect of the International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Nouwen, Sarah M. H. and Werner Wouter, G., ‘Monopolizing Global Justice: International Law as Challenge to Human Diversity’, in Journal of International Criminal Justice, 13 (2015), 157–176.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Ost, François and Van de Kerchove, Michel, De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit (Brussels: Publications des Facultés de Saint Louis, 2002).Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: Evolution of the Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Ostrom Elinor, Joanna Burger, Christopher B. Field, Richard B. Norgaard, David Policansky, , ‘Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges’, in Science, 284 (1999), 278–282.Google Scholar

Oudejans, Nanda, ‘The Right to Not Have Rights: Illegal Migration and the Potentiality of the Law’ (unpublished manuscript, presented at the Conference of Philosophy and the Social Sciences, in Prague, 20–24 May 2015, on file with the author).Google Scholar

Paiement, Phillip, Transnational Sustainability Laws (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Panikkar, Raimon, ‘Is the Notion of Human Rights a Western Concept’, in Diogenes, 120 (1982), 75–102.Google Scholar

Pashukanis, Evgeny, Law and Marxism: A General Theory, translated by Barbara Einhorn (London: Pluto Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Perry, John, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2000).Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘Humanity as the A and the Ω of Sovereignty’, in European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009) 3, 513–544.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘Global Constitutionalism’, in Gibbons, Michael T. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, 2015), 1484–1487.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Pham, Khûe, ‘Ein Schock und eine gute Nachricht’, in Zeit Online, 9 June 2017, available at: www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2017–06/parlamentswahlen-grossbritannien-brexit-theresa-may-jeremy-corbyn/komplettansicht (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Pleyers, Geoffrey, Alter-Globalization: Becoming Actors in the Global Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. and Shaffer, Gregory C., When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Post, David G., ‘Governing Cyberspace’, in Wayne Law Review, 43 (1996) 155–171.Google Scholar

Powell, Walter W., ‘Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization’, in Research in Organizational Behavior, 12 (1990), 295–336.Google Scholar

Pulkowski, Dirk, The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Radbruch, Gustav, Rechtsfilosofie (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar

Rasch, William, Sovereignty and Its Discontents: On the Primacy of Conflict and the Structure of the Political (London: Birkbeck Law Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Reidenberg, Joel, ‘Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology’, in Texas Law Review, 76 (1998) 3, 553–593.Google Scholar

Reitan, Ruth, Global Activism (Milton Park: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul, Time and Narrative, translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1990), vol. 3.Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul, ‘Narrative Identity’, in Philosophy Today, 35 (1991) 1, 73–81.Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul, Oneself as Another, translated by Kathleen Blamely (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul, Le Juste I (Paris: Éditions Esprit, 1995).Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul, Autour du politique (Paris: Seuil, 1999).Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul, Memory, History, Forgetting, translated by Kathleen Blamely and David Pellauer (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Ricœur, Paul, The Course of Recognition, translated by David Pellauer (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Rittlich, Kerry, ‘Who’s Afraid of the Critique of Adjudication? Tracing the Discourse of Law in Development’, in Cardozo Law Review, 22 (2001), 929–945.Google Scholar

Romany, Celina, ‘Women as Aliens: a Feminist Critique of the Public-Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law’, in Harvard Human Rights Journal, 6 (1993) 87–125.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N., ‘Governance in a New Global Order’, in Hewson, Martin and Sinclair, Timothy (eds.), Approaches to Global Governance Theory (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999), 70–86.Google Scholar

Rottenburg, Richard and Merry, Sally Engle, ‘A World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification’, in Rottenburg, Richard, Merry, Sally Engle, Park, Sung-Joon and Mugler, Johanna (eds.), The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 1–33.Google Scholar

Roughan, Nicole, Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Ryngaert, Cedric, Jurisdiction in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Said, Edward, Culture and Imperialism (New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994).Google Scholar

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, Toward a New Legal Common Sense, 2nd edn. (London: Butterworths, 2002).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, ‘Spatialities and Temporalities of the Global: Elements for a Theorization’, in Public Culture, 12 (2000) 1, 260–278.Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, ‘The Global City: Introducing a Concept’, in Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11 (2005) 2, 25–43.Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, A Sociology of Globalization (New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 2007).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, ‘Places and Spaces of the Global: An Expanded Analytic Terrain’, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Globalization Theory: Approaches and Controversies (Cambridge: Polity, 2007), 79–105.Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, ‘Bordering Capabilities versus Borders: Implications for National Borders’, in Michigan Journal of International Law, 30 (2009), 568–597.Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, ‘The Global inside the National: A Research Agenda for Sociology’, Sociopedia.isa, 2010, available at: http://saskiasassen.com/PDFs/publications/the-global-inside-the-national.pdf (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Sassen, Saskia, Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization, 2nd edn. (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Schaffer, Gregory, ‘Reconciling Trade and Regulatory Goals: The Prospects and Limits of New Approaches to Transatlantic Governance through Mutual Recognition and Safe Harbor Agreements’, in Columbia Journal of European Law, 9 (2002), 29–77.Google Scholar

Schill, Stephan W., ‘International Arbitrators as System-Builders’, in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, 106 (2012), 295–297.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, ‘Nehmen/Teilen/Weiden’, in Schmitt, Carl, Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1958), 489–504.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated by George Schwab (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, ‘Appropriation/Distribution/Production: Toward a Proper Formulation of Basic Questions of Any Social and Economic Order (1953)’, in Telos, 95 (1993), 52–64.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl,‘Nomos – Nahme – Name (1959)’, in Schmitt, Carl, Staat, Großraum, Nomos: Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916–1969 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1995), 573–591.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europæum, 4th edn. (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1997).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, translated by Joseph W. Bendersky (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2004).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated by George Schwab (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, translated by George Schwab (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Constitutional Theory, translated by Jeffrey Seitzer (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Schmitthoff, Clive M., ‘International Business Law: A New Law Merchant’, in Current Law and Social Problems, 2 (1961), 129–153.Google Scholar

Scholten Paul, S., Algemeen Deel van Mr C. Asser’s Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlandsch Burgerlijk Recht (Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1934).Google Scholar

Schultz, Thomas; ‘Private Legal Systems: What Cyperspace Might Teach Legal Theorists’, in Yale Journal of Law &Technology, 10 (2007), 151–193.Google Scholar

Schultz, Thomas, ‘Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface’, in European Journal of International Law, 19 (2008) 4, 799–839.Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred and Luckmann, Thomas, The Structures of the Life-World, translated by Richard M. Zaner and H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Scott, Colin, ‘Analyzing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design’, in Public Law, 1 (2001), 283–305.Google Scholar

Scott, Colin, ‘Regulating Global Regimes’, in Levi-Faur, David (ed.), Handbook on the Politics of Regulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 563–575.Google Scholar

Searle, John, Intentionality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Sempasa Samson, L., ‘Obstacles to International Commercial Arbitration in African Countries’, in International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 41 (1992), 387–413.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Sending, Ole Jacob and Neuman, Iver, ‘Governance to Governmentality: NGOs, States and Power’, in International Studies Quarterly, 50 (2006), 651–672.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, ‘The Globalization of Law’, in Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1 (1993), 37–64.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Scott J., ‘Authority’, in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 382–439.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Scott J., Legality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Shapiro, Scott J., ‘Massive Shared Agency’, in Vargas, Manuel and Yaffe, Gideon (eds.), Rational and Social Agency: The Philosophy of Michael Bratman (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 257–292.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’, in European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006) 3, 483–529.Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg, ‘The Stranger’, in On Individuality and Social Forms (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1971) 143–150.Google Scholar

Singer, Peter S., One World: The Ethics of Globalization (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Sitrin, Marina and Azzellini, Dario, They Can’t Represent Us! Reinventing Democracy from Greece to Occupy (London: Verso, 2014).Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin, ‘A Genealogy of the Modern State’, in Proceedings of the British Academy, 162 (2009), 325–370.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Somek, Alexander, ‘Administration without Sovereignty’, in Dobner, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 267–287.Google Scholar

Sørensen, Eva and Torfing, Jacob, ‘The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks’, in Scandinavian Political Studies, 28 (2005) 3, 195–218.Google Scholar

Sous-Commandant, Marcos and Yvon, Le Bot, Le rêve zapatiste (Paris: Seuil, 1997).Google Scholar

Speth, Rudolf and Buchstein, Hubertus, ‘Hannah Arendts Theorie intransitiver Macht’, in Göhler, Gerhard (ed.), Institution – Macht – Repräsentation. Wofür politische Institutionen stehen und wie sie wirken (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1997), 224–261.Google Scholar

Stein, Ursula, Lex Mercatoria: Realität und Theorie (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 1995).Google Scholar

Steiner, Henry J., ‘Ideals and Counter-Ideals in the Struggle over Autonomy Regimes for Minorities’, in Notre Dame Law Review, 55 (1991) 5, 1539–1560.Google Scholar

Stewart Richard, B., ‘Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance: Accountability, Participation and Responsiveness’, in The American Journal of International Law, 108 (2014) 2, 211–270.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec, ‘The New Lex Mercatoria and Transnational Governance’, in Journal of European Public Policy, 13 (2006) 5, 627–646.Google Scholar

Subcomandante, Marcos, ‘Al pueblo de México: hablaron los hombres verdaderos, los sin rostro. Mandar obedeciendo’, 26 February 1994, available at: https://es.wikisource.org/wiki/Discurso_del_Subcomandante_Marcos_%22Mandar_obedeciendo%22 (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian, A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles, ‘Social Theory as Practice’, in Taylor, Charles, Philosophical Papers, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 91–115.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles, ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in Gutmann, Amy (ed.), Multiculturalism and ‘The Politics of Recognition’ (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992), 25–73.Google Scholar

Taylor, Prue, ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind: A Bold Doctrine Kept within Strict Boundaries’, available at: http://wealthofthecommons.org/essay/common-heritage-mankind-bold-doctrine-kept-within-strict-boundaries (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti, Humanity’s Law (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Tencer, Daniel, ‘Hackers Take Down Website of Bank That Froze Wikileaks Funds’, in Raw Story, 6 December 2010. Available at: www.rawstory.com/2010/12/hackers-website-bank-froze-wikileaks-funds/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Tesón, Fernando R., ‘International Human Rights and Cultural Relativism’, in Virginia Journal of International Law, 25 (1985) 4, 869–898.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, ‘Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’, in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law without a State (Dartmouth: Aldershot, 1997), 3–28.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Netzwerk als Vertragsverbund: Virtuelle Unternehmen, Franchising, Just-in-Time in sozialwissenschaftlicher und juristischer Sicht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004).Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centered Constitutional Theory’, in Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Portland, OR: Hartford Publishing, 2004), 3–28.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Thomas v. Norris [1992] 2 Canadian Native Law Reporter (British Columbia Supreme Court), 139–163.Google Scholar

Thürer, Daniel and Burri, Thomas, ‘Self-Determination’, in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law, at: http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e873 (article last updated in December 2008; last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Tourme-Jouannet, Emmanuelle, ‘The International Law of Recognition’, in European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 667–690.Google Scholar

Tully, James, Strange Multiplicities: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Tully, James, ‘Struggles over Recognition and Distribution’, in Constellations 7 (2000) 4, 469–482.Google Scholar

Tuomela, Raimo, The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Tuori, Kaarlo, ‘Transnational Law: On Legal Hybrids and Legal Perspectivism’, in Maduro, Miguel, Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds.), Transnational Law: Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 11–57.Google Scholar

Tuori, Kaarlo, ‘Crossing the Limits but Stuck behind the Fault Lines?’, in Transnational Legal Theory, 7 (2016) 1, 133–153.Google Scholar

Twining, William, General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

UNIDROIT website: www.unidroit.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Urueña, René, ‘Global Administrative Law and the Global South’, in Cassese, Sabino (ed.), Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016), 392–414.Google Scholar

Vallejo, Rodrigo, ‘Private Regulators, Public Interests and the Idea of a Global Administrative Law: The Case of Accounting Standards’ (unpublished manuscript on file with the author).Google Scholar

Valverde, Mariana, Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance (Milton Park: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bas C., Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Van Roermund, Bert, Law, Narrative and Reality: An Essay in Intercepting Politics (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).Google Scholar

Van Roermund, Bert, ‘Constituerende macht, soevereiniteit en representatie’, in Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 64 (2002) 3, 509–532.Google Scholar

Van Roermund, Bert, ‘First-Person Plural Legislature: Political Reflexivity and Representation’, in Philosophical Explorations, 6 (2003) 3, 235–252.Google Scholar

Van Roermund, Bert, ‘Sovereignty: Popular and Unpopular’, in Walker, Neil (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford: Hart Publishers, 2003), 33–54.Google Scholar

Van Roermund, Bert, ‘Kelsen and the Low Skies. Recognition Theory Revisited and Revised’, in Walter, Robert, Jabloner, C. and Zeleny, K. (eds.), Hans Kelsen anderswo. Hans Kelsen abroad (Vienna: Manz Verlag, 2010), 259–278.Google Scholar

Van Roermund, Bert, Legal Thought and Legal Philosophy: What Legal Scholarship Is About (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar

Van Roermund, Bert, ‘What Is Bodily about the Body Politic? II: On How “We” Gather’ (manuscript on file with the author).Google Scholar

Vatter, Miguel, The Republic of the Living: Biopolitics and the Critique of Civil Society (New York: Fordham University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Vesting, Thomas, Die Medien des Rechts: Computernetzwerke (Göttingen: Velbrück, 2015).Google Scholar

Vesting, Thomas, Legal Theory and the Media of Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar

Vía Campesina website: http://viacampesina.org/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Virilio, Paul, Speed and Politics: An Essay on Dromology, translated by Mark Pollizzotti (New York, NY: Semiotext(e), 1977).Google Scholar

Virno, Paolo, A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life (Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e), 2004).Google Scholar

Waldenfels, Bernhard, Antwortregister (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994).Google Scholar

Waldenfels, Bernhard, Order in the Twilight, translated by David J. Parent (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Waldenfels, BernhardVielstimmigkeit der Rede: Studien zur Phänomenologie des Fremden (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1999), vol. 4.Google Scholar

Waldenfels, Bernhard, Verfremdung der Moderne: Phänomenologische Grenzgänge (Essen: Wallstein Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar

Waldenfels, Bernhard, Schattenrisse der Moral (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2006).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘What Is Cosmopolitan?’, in Journal of Political Philosophy, 8 (2000), 227–243.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil, ‘Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders’, in International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (2008), 373–396.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil, ‘Taking Constitutionalism beyond the State’, in Political Studies, 56 (2008), 539–543, 524.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil, ‘The Antinomies of Constitutional Authority’, in Cotterrell, Roger and del Mar, Maksymilian (eds.), Authority in Transnational Legal Theory: Theorising across Disciplines (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), 125–150.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Watson, Alan, Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, 2nd edn. (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Weber, Max, ‘Politics as a Vocation’, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxon: Routledge, 1958).Google Scholar

Wehrle, Maren, ‘Normality and Normativity in Experience’, in Doyon, Maxime and Breyer, Thiemo (eds.), Normativity in Experience (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2015), 128–138.Google Scholar

Werbach, Kevin D., ‘The Song Remains the Same: What Cyberlaw Might Teach the Next Internet Economy’, in Florida Law Review, 69 (2017), 887–957.Google Scholar

Wikipedia entry, ‘Criticism of eBay’: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_eBay#cite_note-58 (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

World Social Forum Montreal 2018 webpage: https://fsm2016.org/en/sinformer/a-propos-du-forum-social-mondial/ (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

WTO website, www.wto.org/ (last accessed on 3 May 2015).Google Scholar

WTO Case, Appellate Body, Report of 16 January 1998 WT/DS26/AB/R&WT/DS48/AB/R, EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products. Available at: www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/hormab.pdf (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

WTO Case, EU – Trade Description of Sardines, Report of the Appellate Body, DS 231/AB/R, 26 September, 2002; United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, WT/DS381/AB/R, of May 16, 2012. Available at www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/381abrw_a_e.pdf (last accessed on 13 December 2017).Google Scholar

Yearbook of the European Convention 1958–1959, Application 176/56 (Greece v. United Kingdom, “Cyprus”), 2 174–199.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, ‘Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder and Enlarged Thought’, in Young, Iris Marion, Intersecting Voices (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997), 38–59.Google Scholar

Young, Margaret, ‘Introduction: The Productive Friction between Regimes’, in Young, Margaret A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 1–19.Google Scholar

Zaring, David, ‘International Law by Other Means: The Twilight Existence of International Financial Regulatory Organizations’, in Texas International Law Journal, 33 (1998), 281–330.Google Scholar

Zekoll, Joachim, ‘Jurisdiction in Cyberspace’, in Handl, Günther, Zekoll, Joachim and Zumbansen, Peer (eds.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012), 341–369.Google Scholar