Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:09:42.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Practical ASAT

from Core Section

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2022

Thomas F. Kelly ,
Brian P. Gorman  and
Simon P. Ringer
Thomas F. Kelly
Affiliation:
Steam Instruments, Inc.
Brian P. Gorman
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines
Simon P. Ringer
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

This chapter looks, not at the big picture, but at the details of an operational ASAT instrument. Can specimens withstand repeated STEM/APT cycling? Is an integrated STEM/APT instrument needed or can they be coupled by a vacuum transport? Will specimen evolution models suffice to deliver a realistic model of the specimen shape throughout an ASAT experiment? In an integrated instrument, can APT and STEM be operated simultaneously? Concerns about radiation damage in ASAT experiments and means for mitigating these effects are explored. The role of electron diffraction in ASAT is considered, and it is seen as an important adjunct to atom probe crystallography. The importance of complementary analytical information such as EDS and especially EELS is illustrated. Since atom probe tomography is a compositional mapping tool, EELS as a chemical mapping tool takes on added import. The interplay among the many elements of ASAT and its intrinsic correlative microscopy opportunities serve as an internal check on results. A synergistic ecosystem of AST information with chemical information correlated with physical properties and image simulations defines the opportunity inherent in Atomic-Scale Analytical Tomography.

Keywords

specimen evolution modelstransmission Kikuchi diffractioncontaminationradiolysiscomputational materials science and engineeringsputteringcrystallographyknock-on damageneedle-shaped specimens
Type
Chapter
Information
Atomic-Scale Analytical Tomography
Concepts and Implications
 , pp. 125 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arslan, I., Marquis, E. A., Homer, M., Hekmaty, M. A., and Bartelt, N. C., “Towards Better 3-D Reconstructions by Combining Electron Tomography and Atom-Probe Tomography,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 108, no. 12, pp. 1579–1585, Nov. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.05.008.Google Scholar
Gorman, B. P., Diercks, D., Salmon, N. et al., “Hardware and Techniques for Cross-Correlative TEM and Atom Probe Analysis,” Microsc. Today, vol. 16, no. 1–4, pp. 42–47, 2008.Google Scholar
Gorman, B. P., Puthucode, A., Diercks, D. R., and Kaufman, M. J., “Cross-correlative TEM and Atom Probe Analysis of Partial Crystallisation in NiNbSn Metallic Glasses,” Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 682–688, Jun. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/174328408x293595.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, W. et al., “HAADF–STEM Atom Counting in Atom Probe Tomography Specimens: Towards Quantitative Correlative Microscopy,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 159, pp. 403–412, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katnagallu, S. et al., “Imaging Individual Solute Atoms at Crystalline Imperfections in Metals,” New J. Phys., vol. 21, no. 12, p. 123020, Dec. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab5cc4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, D., Petersen, T., Ringer, S. P., and Smith, G. D. W., “Atom Probe Trajectory Mapping Using Experimental Tip Shape Measurements,” J. Microsc., vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 170–180, Nov. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03522.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haley, D., Moody, M. P., and Smith, G. D. W., “Level Set Methods for Modelling Field Evaporation in Atom Probe,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1709–1717, 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vurpillot, F., “Private Communication, Université de Rouen,” presented at the test1, University of Rouen, 2016, [Online]. Available: test2.Google Scholar
Gorman, B. P., “Systems and Methods of Aberration Correction for Atom Probe Tomography,” US Patent: US20190318907A1, Oct. 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Larson, D. J. et al., “Field-Ion Specimen Preparation Using Focused Ion-Beam Milling,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 79, pp. 287–293, 1999.Google Scholar
Miller, M. K., Russell, K. F., Thompson, K., Alvis, R., and Larson, D. J., “Review of Atom Probe FIB-Based Specimen Preparation Methods,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 428–436, Nov. 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927607070845.Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Lawrence, D. J., Larson, D. J. et al., “In-Situ Site-Specific Specimen Preparation for Atom Probe Tomography,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 107, no. 2–3, pp. 131–139, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prosa, T. J. and Larson, D. J., “Modern Focused-Ion-Beam-Based Site-Specific Specimen Preparation for Atom Probe Tomography,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 23, no. 2, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927616012642.Google Scholar
Burton, G. L., Ricote, S., Foran, B. J., Diercks, D. R., and Gorman, B. P., “Quantification of Grain Boundary Defect Chemistry in a Mixed Proton-Electron Conducting Oxide Composite,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 3217–3230, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17014.Google Scholar
Larson, D. J., Camus, P. P., and Kelly, T. F., “Scanning Electron Microscopy in Very High Electric Fields Near Field Ion/Emission Specimens,” in 53rd Annual Meeting of the Microscopy Society of America, 1995, pp. 624–625.Google Scholar
Kirchhofer, R., Diercks, D. R., and Gorman, B. P., “Electron Diffraction and Imaging for Atom Probe Tomography,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 89, no. 5, p. 053706, May 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4999484.Google Scholar
Dunin-Borkowski, R. E., Kasama, T., McCartney, M. R., and Smith, D. J., “Electron Holography,” in Science of Microscopy, 2 vols., Hawkes, P. W. and Spence, J. C. H., eds. New York: Springer, 2007, pp. 1141–1195.Google Scholar
Beleggia, M., Kasama, T., Larson, D. J. et al., “Towards Quantitative Off-Axis Electron Holographic Mapping of the Electric Field around the Tip of a Sharp Biased Metallic Needle,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 116, no. 2, p. 024305, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4887448.Google Scholar
Zheng, F., Migunov, V., Caron, J. et al., “Three-Dimensional Electric Field Mapping of an Electrically Biased Atom Probe Needle Using Off-Axis Electron Holography,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 25, no. S2, pp. 326–327, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927619002368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H., “Nonstandard Imaging Methods in Electron Microscopy,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 2, pp. 251–267, Jan. 1976, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3991(76)91538-2.Google Scholar
MacLaren, I. et al., “On the Origin of Differential Phase Contrast at a Locally Charged and Globally Charge-Compensated Domain Boundary in a Polar-Ordered Material,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 154, pp. 57–63, Jul. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.03.016.Google Scholar
Lubk, A. and Zweck, J., “Differential Phase Contrast: An Integral Perspective,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 91, no. 2, p. 023805, Feb. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.023805.Google Scholar
Gault, B., Moody, M. P., Cairney, J. M., and Ringer, S. P., “Atom Probe Crystallography,” Mater. Today, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 378–386, Sep. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiser, B. P., Kelly, T. F., Larson, D. J., Schneir, J., and Roberts, J. P., “Spatial Distribution Maps for Atom Probe Tomography,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 437–447, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babinsky, K., De Kloe, R., Clemens, H., and Primig, S., “A Novel Approach for Site-Specific Atom Probe Specimen Preparation by Focused Ion Beam and Transmission Electron Backscatter Diffraction,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 144, pp. 9–18, Sep. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.04.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, G. L., Wright, S., Stokes, A. et al., “Orientation Mapping with Kikuchi Patterns Generated from a Focused STEM Probe and Indexing with Commercially Available EDAX Software,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 209, p. 112882, Feb. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.112882.Google Scholar
Herbig, M., Choi, P.-P., and Raabe, D., “Combining Structural and Chemical Information on the Nanometer Scale by Correlative TEM and APT,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 19, no. S2, pp. 948–949, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927613006739.Google Scholar
Rice, K. P., Keller, R. R., and Stoykovich, M. P., “Specimen-Thickness Effects on Transmission Kikuchi Patterns in the Scanning Electron Microscope,” J. Microsc., vol. 254, no. 3, pp. 129–136, Jun. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12124.Google Scholar
Herbig, M., Choi, P.-P., and Raabe, D., “Combining Structural and Chemical Information at the Nanometer Scale by Correlative Transmission Electron Microscopy and Atom Probe Tomography,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 153, pp. 32–39, Jun. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.003.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Rice, K. P., Prosa, T. J., Marquis, E. A., and Reed, R. C., “Integrated APT/t-EBSD for Grain Boundary Analysis of Thermally Grown Oxide on a Ni-Based Superalloy,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 21, no. Supplement S3, pp. 687–688, Aug. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927615004237.Google Scholar
Rice, K. P., Chen, Y., Prosa, T. J., and Larson, D. J., “Implementing Transmission Electron Backscatter Diffraction for Atom Probe Tomography,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 22, no. 03, pp. 583–588, Jun. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927616011296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, A. J. et al., “Correlating Atom Probe Crystallographic Measurements with Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction Data,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927616012605.Google Scholar
Guo, W. et al., “Correlative Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopic Tomography and Atom Probe Tomography of the Phase Separation in an Alnico 8 Alloy,” Microsc. Microanal., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1251–1260, Dec. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927616012496.Google Scholar
Bachhav, M., Danoix, R., Danoix, F. et al., “Investigation of Wustite (Fe1-xO) by Femtosecond Laser Assisted Atom Probe Tomography,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 111, pp. 584–588, 2011.Google Scholar
Bachhav, M., Danoix, F., Hannoyer, B., Bassat, J. M., and Danoix, R., “Investigation of O-18 Enriched Hematite (α-Fe2O3) by Laser Assisted Atom Probe Tomography,” Int. J. Mass Spectrom., vol. 335, pp. 57–60, Feb. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2012.10.012.Google Scholar
Keast, V. J., Scott, A. J., Brydson, R., Williams, D. B., and Bruley, J., “Electron Energy-Loss Near-Edge Structure – a Tool for the Investigation of Electronic Structure on the Nanometre Scale,” J. Microsc., vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 135–175, Aug. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00898.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarausch, K., Thomas, P., Leonard, D. N., Twesten, R., and Booth, C. R., “Four-Dimensional STEM-EELS: Enabling Nano-scale Chemical Tomography,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 326–337, Mar. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.12.012.Google Scholar
Binev, P., Dahmen, W., DeVore, R. et al., “Compressed Sensing and Electron Microscopy,” in Modeling Nanoscale Imaging in Electron Microscopy, Vogt, T., Dahmen, W., and Binev, P., eds. Springer US, 2012, pp. 73–126.Google Scholar
Leary, R., Saghi, Z., Midgley, P. A., and Holland, D. J., “Compressed Sensing Electron Tomography,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 131, pp. 70–91, Aug. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.019.Google Scholar
Saghi, Z. et al., “Compressed Sensing Electron Tomography of Needle-Shaped Biological Specimens – Potential for Improved Reconstruction Fidelity with Reduced Dose,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 160, pp. 230–238, Jan. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.021.Google Scholar
Egerton, R. F., Li, P., and Malac, M., “Radiation Damage in the TEM and SEM,” Micron, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 399–409, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003.Google Scholar
Rose, H., “Outline of a Spherically Corrected Semiaplanatic Medium-Voltage TEM,” Optik, vol. 85, pp. 19–24, 1990.Google Scholar
Bell, D. C., Mankin, M., Day, R. W., and Erdman, N., “Successful Application of Low Voltage Electron Microscopy to Practical Materials Problems,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 145, pp. 56–65, Oct. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.03.005.Google Scholar
Lee, Z., Rose, H., Lehtinen, O., Biskupek, J., and Kaiser, U., “Electron Dose Dependence of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Atom Contrast and Resolution in Transmission Electron Microscope Images,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 145, pp. 3–12, Oct. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.01.010.Google Scholar
Hren, J. J., “Barriers to AEM: Contamination and Etching,” in Introduction to Analytical Electron Microscopy, Hren, J. J, Goldstein, J. I, and Joy, D. C, eds. New York: Plenum Press, 1979, pp. 481–505.Google Scholar
Wall, J. S., “Contamination in the STEM at Ultra High Vacuum,” Scanning Electron Microsc.-1980, pp. 99–106, 1980.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×