Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T13:08:46.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - From measures to celestial coordinates

from Part IV - From detected photons to the celestial sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

By
Zheng Hong Tang  and
William F. van Altena
Edited by
William F. van Altena
William F. van Altena
Affiliation:
Yale University
William F. van Altena
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The goal of this book is to present an introduction to the techniques of astrometry and to highlight several applications of those techniques to the solution of current problems of astrophysical interest. In some cases we require the absolute positions of objects to establish reference frames and systems, while in others we need the change in position with time to obtain the distances and tangential velocities of the objects. The astrometric procedures necessary to solve those problems have been laid out in considerable detail by Konig (1933, 1962), Smart (1931), and others, so we will summarize the methods used to transform raw coordinate measurements of celestial objects on photographic plates and CCDs to their corresponding coordinates on the celestial sphere. We recommend that the reader consult the above references where clarification is needed. Once we have the desired celestial coordinates and their changes with time that yield parallaxes and proper motions, we can then create catalogs of those quantities and apply them to the solution of problems in galactic structure, the masses of stars, membership in star clusters, dynamical studies of objects in the Solar System, and extrasolar planets, and to help to set limits to some cosmological models.

Telescope and detector alignment

We normally assume that our telescope and detector have been carefully aligned so that the image quality will be optimum over the field of view (FOV). However, even if the apparent image quality is good over the FOV, it may be that residual misalignments remain that complicate the transformation from detector to sky. Quite often, high-order polynomials are used to absorb the effects of those misalignments. Unfortunately, that procedure obscures the interpretation of the transformation terms and can lead to spurious and/or lower-accuracy results.

Type
Chapter
Information
Astrometry for Astrophysics
Methods, Models, and Applications
 , pp. 277 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, J. and King, I. R. (1999). Astrometric and photometric corrections for the 34th-row error in HST's WFPC2 Camera. PASP, 111, 1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. and King, I. R. (2000). Toward high-precision astrometry with WFPC2. I. Deriving an accurate point-spread function. PASP, 112, 1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arend, S. (1951). Theorie de l'equatorial visuel et de l'equatorial photographique. Reglage pratique de l'equatorial visuel et de l'astrographe. Brussels: Observatoire Royal de Belgique.Google Scholar
Bertin, E. and Arnouts, S. (1996). SExtractor: software for source extraction. A&AS, 117, 393.Google Scholar
de Vegt, C., Hindsley, R., Zacharias, N., and Winter, L. (2001). A catalog of faint reference stars in 398 fields of extragalactic radio reference frame sources (ERLcat). AJ, 121, 2815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vegt, C., Laux, U., and Zacharias, N. (2003). A dedicated 1-meter telescope for high precision astrometric sky mapping of faint stars. In Small Telescopes in the New Millennium II. The Telescopes We Use, ed. T., Oswalt, Dordrecht: Kluwer, p. 255.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, H. K. (1960). Über die Reduktion von photographischen Sternpositionen und Eigenbewegungen. AN, 285, 233.Google Scholar
Girard, T. M., Dinescu, D. I., van Altena, W. F., Platais, I., Monet, D. G., and López, C. E. (2004). The Southern Proper Motion Program. III. A near-complete catalog to V = 17.5. AJ, 127, 3060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, T. M., van Altena, W. F., Zacharias, N., et al. (2011). The Southern Proper Motion Program. IV. The SPM4 Catalog. AJ, 142, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Googe, W.D., Eichhorn, H., and Lukac, C. F. (1970). The overlap algorithm for the reduction of photographic star catalogues. MNRAS, 150, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X., Girard, T., van Altena, W. F., and López, C. E. (1993). Space velocity of the globular cluster NGC 288 and astrometry with the CTIO 4 meter telescope. AJ, 105, 2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, , et al. (1998). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera. AJ, 116, 3040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. B., Klemola, A. R., Jones, B. F., and Monet, D. G. (2004). Lick Northern Proper Motion Program. III. Lick NPM2 Catalog. AJ, 128, 1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferys, W. H., Fitzpatrick, M. J., and McArthur, B. E. (1988). GaussFit – a system for least squares and robust estimation. Celestial Mechan., 41, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferys, W., Whipple, A.,Wang, Q., et al. (1994). Optical field-angle distortion calibration of FGS3. In Calibrating Hubble Space Telescope, ed. J. C., Blades and S. J., Osmer., Baltimore, MD: Space Telescope Science Institute, p. 353.Google Scholar
Konig, A. (1933). Reduktion photographischer Himmelsaufnahmen. In Handbuch der Astrophysik. Berlin: Springer Verlag, vol. 1, ch. 6.Google Scholar
Konig, A. (1962). Astrometry with astrographs. In Astronomical Techniques, ed. W. A., Hiltner. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, ch. 20, p. 461.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-F. and van Altena, W. F. (1983). Theoretical studies of the effects of grain noise on photographic stellar astrometry and photometry. AJ, 88, 1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindegren, L. (2010). High-accuracy positioning: astrometry. In Observing Photons in Space. ed. M. C. E., Huber, A., Pauluhn, J. L., Culhane, et al. Bern: International Space Science Institute, ISSI Scientific Reports Series, p. 279.Google Scholar
Meeks, M. L., Ball, J. A., and Hull, A. B. (1968). The pointing calibration of the Haystack antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., AP-16, 746.Google Scholar
Platais, I., Kozhurina-Platais, V., Girard, T. M., et al. (2002). WIYN Open Cluster Study. VIII. The geometry and stability of the NOAO CCD Mosaic Imager. AJ, 124, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platais, I., Wyse, R. F. G., and Zacharias, N. (2006). Deep astrometric standards and Galactic structure. PASP, 118, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, F. and Barney, I. (1925). Trans. Astron. Obs. Yale Univ., 4, 5.
Schroeder, D. (2000). Astronomical Optics, 2nd edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smart, W. M. (1931). Spherical Astronomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stetson, P. (1987). DAOPHOT – a computer program for crowded-field stellar photometry. PASP, 99, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J. (1981). Block adjustment in photographic astrometry. Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica, 6, 115.Google Scholar
Taff, L. G. (1988). The plate-overlap technique – a reformulation. AJ, 96, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taff, L. G. (1989). Schmidt plate astrometry – subplate overlap. AJ, 98, 1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taff, L. G., Lattanzi, M. G., and Bucciarelli, B. (1990). Two successful techniques for Schmidt plate astrometry. ApJ, 358, 359.Google Scholar
van Altena, W. F. and Monnier, R. C. (1968). Astrometric accuracy and the flatness of glass filters. AJ, 73, 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, P. T. (1979). Telescope Pointing Investigations at the Anglo-Australian Observatory. Epping: Anglo-Austrian Society.Google Scholar
Wallace, P. T. and Tritton, K. P. (1979). Alignment, pointing accuracy and field rotation of the UK 1.2 m Schmidt telescope. MNRAS, 189, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, N. (1992). Global block adjustment simulations using the CPC 2 data structure. A&A, 264, 296.Google Scholar
Zacharias, N., de Vegt, C., and Murray, C. A. (1997). CPC2 plate reductions with HIPPARCOS stars: first results. In Proceedings of the ESA Symposium “Hipparcos – Venice '97.” ESA SP-402, 85.Google Scholar
Zacharias, N., Urban, S. E., Zacharias, M. I., et al. (2000). The first US Naval Observatory CCD astrograph catalog. AJ, 120, 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×