Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:36:01.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Paruedee Nguitragool
Affiliation:
Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Jűrgen Rűland
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora
Reality, Potential and Constraints
, pp. 280 - 311
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, A. (2001) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, A. (2004) “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,” International Organization 58: 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, A. (2009) Whose Ideas Matter: Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, A. (2012) “Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time has Come?,” International Spectator 47(1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahram, A. (2010) “The Theory and Method of Comparative Area Studies,” Qualitative Research 11(1): 69–90.Google Scholar
Ajanant, J., Chirathivat, S. and Iamkamala, C. (1988) “Trade Policy Options for Thailand.” In Ariff, M. and Tan, L.-H. (eds.), Asean Trade Policy Options: The Uruguay Round, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Alatas, A. (2001) A Voice for a Just Peace. A Collection of Speeches, Jakarta and Singapore: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama in cooperation with Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Alburo, F., Medalla, E. and PanteJr., F. (1988) “Trade Policy Option for the Philippines.” In Ariff, M. and Tan, L.-H. (eds.), Asean Trade Policy Options: The Uruguay Round, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Allen, D. and Smith, M. (1991) “Western Europe's Presence in the Contemporary International Arena.” In Holland, M. (ed.), The Future of European Political Cooperation, New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Allen, D. and Smith, M. (1998) “The European Union's Presence in the New European Security Order: Barrier, Facilitator or Manager?” In Rhodes, C. (ed.), The European Union in the Global Community, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 213–230.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J. and Meunier, S. (2006) “Nested and Overlapping Regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute,” Journal of European Public Policy 13(3): 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. R. O'G. (1972) “The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture.” In Holt, C. (ed.), Culture and Politics in Indonesia, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–70.Google Scholar
Anggoro, K. (2005) “Geopolitik, Pengedalian Ruang Laga dan Strategi Pertahanan Indonesia.” In Bandoro, B. (ed.), Perspektif Baru Keamanan Nasional, Jakarta: Center for Strategic and International Studies, pp. 61–79.Google Scholar
Anwar, D. F. (1992) Indonesia and the Security of Southeast Asia, Jakarta: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Anwar, D. F. (1994) Indonesia in ASEAN: Foreign Policy and Regionalism, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Asian Political News (2002) “Philippines Threatened to Pull Out of Cairns Group,” 11 February 2002, available at: http://business.highbeam.com/435555/article-1G1-84268849/philippines-threatens-pull-out-cairns-group (accessed 13 November 2012).
Ariff, M. and Tan, L.-H. (eds.) (1988) Asean Trade Policy Options: The Uruguay Round, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASEAN (1988) “The 20th ASEAN Economic Ministers Meeting, Thailand, 17–19 October 1988,” available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20081202001004/http://www.aseansec.org/7136.htm (accessed 4 November 2014).
ASEAN (1989) “Joint Communiqué of the 22nd ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Banda Seri Begawan, 3–4 July 1989,” available at: www.asean.org/communities/asean-political-security-community/item/joint-communique-of-the-22nd-asean-ministerial-meeting-bandar-seri-begawan-3-4-july-1989 (accessed 8 November 2012).
ASEAN (1999) “Listen to Southeast Asia in Seattle by Rodolfo C. Severino Secretary General of ASEAN, for International Herald Tribune,” 25 November 1999, available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20120514165122/http://www.aseansec.org/2824.htm (accessed 4 November 2014).
ASEAN (2001a) Joint Press Statement, The Twenty-Third Meeting of the ASEAN Ministers on Agriculture and Forestry (23rd AMAF), 5 October 2001, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia, available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20080907064543/http://www.aseansec.org/1071.htm (accessed 4 November 2014).
ASEAN (2001b) Joint Communiqué, The Fifteenth ASEAN Labour Ministers Meeting, 10–11 May 2001, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, available at: www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/item/joint-communique-the-fifteenth-asean-labour-ministers-meeting-10-11-may-2001-kuala-lumpur-malaysia (accessed 8 January 2013).
ASEAN (2004) Joint Communiqué, The Eighteenth ASEAN Labour Ministers Meeting, 13–14 May 2004, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam, available at: www.asean.org/communities/asean-socio-cultural-community/item/joint-communique-the-eighteenth-asean-labour-ministers-meeting (accessed 23 July 2012).
ASEAN (2010a) A Humanitarian Call: The ASEAN Response to Cyclone Nargis, Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
ASEAN (2010b) The Story of the ASEAN-Led Coordination in Myanmar: Compassion in Action, Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
Assmann, Jan (2002) Kollektives Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen, Munich: Beck'sche Reihe.Google Scholar
Ba, A. (2009) (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (2005) “Power in International Politics,” International Organization 59(1): 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Basedau, M. and Köllner, P. (2007) “Area Studies, Comparative Area Studies, and the Study of Politics: Context, Substance, and Methodological Challenges,” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 1(1): 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. (1997) Was ist Globalisierung?, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Beeson, M. and Stone, D. (2013) “The European Union Model's Influence in Asia after the Global Financial Crisis,” European Journal of East Asian Studies 12(2): 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berensmann, K., Fues, T. and Volz, U. (2011) Die G20: Rolle und Herausforderungen, Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.Google Scholar
Bellamy, A. J. and Beeson, M. (2010) “The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: Can ASEAN Reconcile Humanitarianism and Sovereignty?,” Asian Security 6(3): 262–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. (2000) “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment,” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, E. E. (1970) Zwiespältige Eliten. Eine sozialpsychologische Untersuchung über administrative Eliten in Thailand, Berne: Huber.Google Scholar
Boesche, R. (2002) The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and his Arthasastra, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2009) “The Transformative Power of Europe: The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas,” Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) Working Paper 1, Freie Universität Berlin.
Bourchier, D. (1999) “Positivism and Romanticism in Indonesian Legal Thought.” In Lindsey, T. (ed.), Indonesia: Law and Society, Sydney: The Federation Press, pp. 186–196.Google Scholar
Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (1999) The European Union As a Global Actor, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunyanunda, M. (2002) “Burma, ASEAN, and Human Rights: The Decade of Constructive Engagement, 1991–2001,” Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs 2(1): 118–135.Google Scholar
Burmester, N. and Jankowski, M. (2013) “The Unsolved Puzzle: Pacific Asia's Voting Cohesion in the United Nations General Assembly – A Response to Peter Ferdinand,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12028/abstract.
Buruma, I. and Margalit, A. (2005) Okzidentalismus. Der Westen in den Augen seiner Feinde, Vienna: Hanser.Google Scholar
Caballero-Anthony, M. (2004) “Non-State Regional Governance Mechanism for Economic Security: The Case of the ASEAN People's Assembly,” Pacific Review 17(4): 567–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capie, D. (2012) “The Responsibility to Protect Norm in Southeast Asia: Framing, Resistance and the Localization Myth,” Pacific Review 25(1): 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrapatoso, A. (2008) “Ein Klima der Veränderung? Ergebnisse des Weltklimagipfels in Bali 2007,” GIGA Focus, 3 (2008), Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.Google Scholar
Chachavalpongpun, P. (2005) A Plastic Nation: The Curse of Thainess in Thai–Burmese Relations, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Chachavalpongpun, P. (2010) Reinventing Thailand: Thaksin and His Foreign Policy, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chachavalpongpun, P. (2012) “Thailand Set to Profit from Burma's New Dawei Port Project,” East Asia Forum, 24 February 2012, available at: www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/02/24/thailand-set-to-profit-from-burma-s-new-dawei-port-project/ (accessed 24 December 2013).
Chalermpalanupap, T. (2009) “ASEAN and Myanmar: From Flexible Engagement to Enhanced Interactions, Shared Commitment and Collective Responsibility Building,” presented at the workshop “Myanmar/Burma: Outside Interests and Inside Challenges,” Washington, DC, 28–30 October 2009.
Chandra, A. C. (2005) “Indonesia and Bilateral Trade Agreements (BTAs),” Pacific Review 18(4): 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, I. A. (2010) “The Global Governance Group (3G) and Singaporean Leadership: Can Small Be Significant?,” Working Paper 108, Institute of South Studies, National University of Singapore.
Coleman, W. D. and Tangerman, S. (1999) “The 1992 CAP Reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission: Conceptualizing Linked Policy Games,” Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A. (2008) “A People-Oriented ASEAN: A Door Ajar or Closed for Civil Society Organizations?,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 30(2): 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collinson, S. (1999) “‘Issue-Systems,’ ‘Multi-Level Games’ and the EU's External Commercial and Associated Policies: A Research Agenda,” Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conceição-Heldt, E. (2006) “Integrative and Distributive Bargaining Situations in the European Union: What Difference Does it Make?Negotiation Journal 22(2): 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cororaton, C. B. and Corong, E. L. (2009) “Philippine Agricultural and Food Policies: Implication for Poverty and Income Distribution,” Research Report 161, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), available at: www.ifpri.org/publication/philippine-agricultural-and-food-policies (accessed 5 November 2012).
Czempiel, E.-O. (1994) Die Reform der UNO. Möglichkeiten und Missverständnisse, Munich: Beck'sche Reihe.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. J. (1994) “ASEAN: The Legal Framework for Its Trade Relations,” International Journal 49(3): 588–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lombaerde, P., Baert, F. and Felício, T. (eds.) (2012) The United Nations and the Regions: Third World Report on Regional Integration, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lombaerde, P., Söderbaum, F., van Langenhove, L. and Baert, F. (2010) “The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism,” Review of International Studies 36: 731–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, C. M. (2004) “The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) and Inter-Regionalism: Towards a Theory of Multilateral Utility,” Asian Survey 44(2): 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Foreign Trade (2013) “สถานการณ์ข้าวโลกเดือนพฤษภาคม 2556” [world rice production and marketing, May 2013], Ministry of Commerce, Government of Thailand, available at: http://pcoc.moc.go.th/wappPCOC/62/upload/File_IPD_FILE62228625.doc (accessed 25 February 2014).
Desierto, D. A. (2010–2011) “ASEAN's Constitutionalization of International Law: Challenges to Evolution under the New ASEAN Charter,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 268: 267–320.Google Scholar
Desker, B. (2001) “Asian Developing Countries and the Next Round of WTO Negotiations,” Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.
Desker, B. (2009) “Informal Caucuses within the WTO: Singapore in the ‘Invisibles Group’,” Working Paper 188, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Desker, B. (2011) “Asian Developing Countries and the Next Round of WTO Negotiations,” Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.
Desker, B. and Ng, J. (2011) “Responsibility to Protect: Tensions between Sovereignty and Security,” RSIS Commentaries 142/2011, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Devies, P. (2001) “Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services,” Politics 21: 73–80.Google Scholar
Dieter, H. (1998) Die Asienkrise. Ursachen, Konsequenzen und die Rolle des Internationalen Währungsfonds, Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Dobson, H. (2011) “The G20: Engine of Asian Regionalism?,” Working Paper 179, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg.
Doidge, M. (2011) The European Union and Interregionalism: Patterns of Engagement, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dörflinger, J.-S. (2009) “Die Reform des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen,” Master's thesis, University of Freiburg.
Dosch, J. (1997) Die ASEAN. Bilanz eines Erfolges. Akteure, Interessenlagen, Kooperationsbeziehungen, Hamburg: Abera Network.Google Scholar
Dosch, J. (2003) “The Post Cold War Development of Regionalism in East Asia.” In Liu, F.-K. and Regnier, P. (eds.), Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 30–51.Google Scholar
Druckman, J. N. (2011) “What's it all about? Framing in Political Science.” In Keren, G. (ed.), Perspectives on Framing, New York: Psychology Press, pp. 279–302.Google Scholar
Elliott, K. A. (2000) “The ILO and Enforcement of Core Labor Standard,” International Economics Policy Briefs 00–6, available at: www.iie.com/publications/pb/pb00-6.pdf (accessed 20 July 2012).
Fawcett, L. and Hurrell, A. (eds.) (1995) Regionalism in World Politics, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, P. (2013) “Foreign Policy Convergence in Pacific Asia: The Evidence from Voting in the UN General Assembly,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 16(4): 662–679, available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12019/abstract.Google Scholar
Forman, S. and Segaar, D. (2006) “New Coalition for Global Governance: The Changing Dynamics of Multilateralism,” Global Governance 12: 205–225.Google Scholar
Freistein, K. (2008) “Beyond the Taboos?: The Opportunities and Limitations of Asian-European Track-two Dialogue.” In Rüland, J. et al. (eds.), Asian-European Relations: Building Blocks for Global Governance, London: Routledge, pp. 348–381.Google Scholar
Friends of the Earth Canada (2005) “A Civil Society Handbook: International Labour Organization,” www.foecanada.org.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1986a) “WTO/GATT Ministerial Declaration on the Uruguay Round (Declaration of 20 September 1986)”, available at: www.jus.uio.no/lm/wto.gatt.ministerial.declaration.uruguay.round.1986/d.html (accessed 7 November 2012).
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1986b) “ASEAN: Statement at the Meeting of the GATT Contracting Parties at Ministerial Level, 15–19 September 1986, Punta del Este, Uruguay,” MIN(86)/ST/4, 15 September 1986, available at: www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/91240016.pdf (accessed 7 November 2012).
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1987a) “Negotiating Group on Agriculture, 26–27 October 1987: Statement by the ASEAN Countries on Cairns Proposal,” MTN.GNG/NG5/W/25, 5 November 1987, available at: www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/92030077.pdf (accessed 29 October 2012).
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1987b) “Tropical Products: Submission by ASEAN Countries,” MIN.GNG/NG6/W/9, 14 July 1987, available at: www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/92020219.pdf (accessed 7 November 2012).
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1987c) “Negotiating Group on Tropical Products, Meeting of 26 February 1987: Note by the Secretariat, MTN.GNG/NG6/1, 10 March 1987, available at: www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/92020043.pdf (accessed 7 November 2012).
George, A. L. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gérard, F. (2010) “Indonesian Experience in Rice Price Stabilization,” Groupe de recherche et d'échanges sur la régulation des marchés agricoles (GREMA), available at: www.inter-reseaux.org/IMG/pdf/Indonesian_experience_in_rice_price_stabilization.pdf (accessed 19 March 2014).
Gerard, K. (2013) “From the ASEAN People's Assembly to the ASEAN Civil Society Conference: The Boundaries of Civil Society Advocacy,” Contemporary Politics 19(4): 411–426, www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13569775.2013.835113?journalCode=ccpo20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J. (2008) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, B., Green, M., Tsuji, K. and Watts, W. (2009) Strategic Views on Asian Regionalism: Survey Results and Analysis, Washington, DC: Center for International and Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Gingrich, C. D. (1994) “GATT and the Thai Agricultural Economy,” GATT Research Paper 94-GATT 16, April 1994, available at: www.card.iastate.edu/publications/dbs/pdffiles/94gatt16.pdf (accessed 5 November 2012).
Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. O. (1993) “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework.” In Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Gordon, B. K. (1966) The Dimensions of Conflict in Southeast Asia, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Grieco, J. M. (1996) “State Interests and Institutional Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Reinterpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union.” In Frankel, B. (ed.), Realism: Restatements and Renewal, London: Frank Cass, pp. 262–305.Google Scholar
Grimes, W. W. (2011) “The Future of Regional Liquidity Arrangements in East Asia: Lessons from the Global Financial Crisis,” Pacific Review 24(3): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guggenheim, S. (2012) “Indonesia's Quiet Springtime: Knowledge, Policy and Reform.” In Reid, A. (ed.), Indonesia Rising: The Repositioning of Asia's Third Giant, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 141–169.Google Scholar
Haacke, J. (2003) ASEAN's Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Development and Prospects, London and New York:RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Haacke, J. (2006) “Regional Security Institutions: ASEAN, ARF, SCO and KEDO.” In Hoadley, S. and Rüland, J. (eds.), Asian Security Reassessed, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 128–170.Google Scholar
Haas, E. B. and Rowe, E. T. (1973) “Regional Organizations in the United Nations: Is There Externalization?,” International Studies Quarterly 17(1): 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, M. (1997) “ASEAN's Pivotal Role in Asian-Pacific Regional Cooperation,” Global Governance 3: 329–348.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1985) Das Gedächtnis und seine sozialen Bedingungen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hänggi, H. (1992) Neutralität in Südostasien. Das Projekt einer Zone des Friedens, der Freiheit und der Neutralität, Berne: Haupt.Google Scholar
Hänggi, H., Roloff, R. and Rüland, J. (eds.) (2006) Interregionalism and International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
He, K. and Feng, H. (2008) “If Not Soft Balancing, Then What? Reconsidering Soft Balancing and US Policy Toward China,” Security Studies 17(2): 363–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, S., Pearce, R. and Stockbridge, M. (1998) “The Implications of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture for Developing Countries,” Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, available at: www.fao.org/docrep/004/w7814e/w7814e00.htm (accessed 31 October 2012).
Hernandez, C. G. (2007) “The Coming of Age of Participatory Enlargement: Bringing the People to the ASEAN Table.” In Soesastro, H. and Joewono, C. (eds.), The Inclusive Regionalist: A Festschrift Dedicated to Jusuf Wanandi, Jakarta: Centre for Strategic Studies, pp. 281–289.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. (2012) “A False Start? Indonesian Business Associations as Democratic Actors in the Immediate Post-Soeharto Era,” Indonesian Studies Working Paper 15, University of Sydney.
Hidayat, N. (2002) “WTO, Indonesian Agriculture, and Food Security,” paper prepared for AFTINET seminar on alternatives to the WTO, Sydney, 8 November, available at: www.aftinet.org.au/papers/hidayat1.html (accessed 18 March 2014).
Hook, G., Gilson, J., Hughes, C. and Dobson, H. (2005) Japan's International Relations: Politics, Economy and Security, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopf, T. (1998) “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” International Security 23(1): 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, W. G. (1994) Economic Growth of Singapore: Trade and Development in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huotari, M. (2012) “Practices of Financial Regionalism and the Negotiation of Community in East Asia,” Occasional Paper Series 8, Southeast Asian Studies, University of Freiburg.
Huotari, M. and Rüland, J. (2014) “Context, Concepts and Comparison in Southeast Asian Studies,” Introduction to special issue, Pacific Affairs 87(3): 415–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, A. (2006) “Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-Be Great Powers?,” International Affairs 82(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igarashi, S. (2011) “The New Regional Order and Transnational Civil Society in Southeast Asia: Focusing on Alternative Regionalism from Below in the Process of Building the ASEAN Community,” World Political Science Review 7(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Indrani, T. (2001) “Agriculture and Food Security: Developments in Malaysia,” in Situation of Agriculture in Malaysia – A Cause for Concern, Education and Research Association for Consumers (ERA Consumer), Malaysia.Google Scholar
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (2006) “Malaysian Informal Paper on Special Products Draws Objections from G-33,” Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest 10(12), available at: http://ictsd.org/i/news/bridgesweekly/6289/ (accessed 17 March 2014).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2000a) “International Labour Conference Adopts Resolution Targeting Forced Labour in Myanmar (Burma),” press release, 14 June, available at: www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_007899/lang--en/index.htm (accessed 20 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2000b) “Effect Given by the Government of Myanmar to the Recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry Established to Examine the Observance of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29),” GB 279/6/1, 279th Session, Geneva, November, available at: www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb279/pdf/gb-6-1.pdf (accessed 20 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2001a) “Developments Concerning the Question of the Observance by the Government of Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29),” GB 280/6, 280th Session, Geneva (March), available at: www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb280/pdf/gb-6.pdf (accessed 20 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2001b) Provisional Record, Eighty-ninth Session, Geneva, 19, Part Three, Special Sitting Concerning the Application by Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), in Application of the Resolution Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its 88th (2000) Session, available at: www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc89/pdf/pr-19-3.pdf (accessed 20 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2003) ASEAN Senior Labour Officials Meeting and Labour Ministers Meeting, Mataram, Indonesia, 5–9 May, Mission Report, available at: www.ilo.org/public/english/region/asro/mdtbangkok/download/almmay.pdf (accessed 20 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2005) Provisional Record, Ninety-third Session, Geneva, 22, Part Three, Special Sitting to Examine Developments concerning the Question of the Observance by the Government of Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), available at: www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc93/pdf/pr-22-3.pdf (accessed 24 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2007) Provisional Record, Ninety-sixth Session, Geneva, 22, Part Three, Observations and Information concerning Particular Countries, Special Sitting to Examine Developments concerning the Question of the Observance by the Government of Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), available at: www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc96/pdf/pr-22-part3.pdf (accessed 24 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2012a) Third Item on the Agenda: Information and Reports on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, Provisional Record, 101st Session, Geneva, May–June, 19, Part Three, Observations and Information concerning Particular Countries, Special Sitting to Examine Developments concerning the Question of the Observance by the Government of Myanmar of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), available at: www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_183283.pdf (accessed 26 July 2012).
International Labor Organization (ILO) (2012b) Reports of the Selection Committee, Provisional Record, 2–4, 101st Session, Geneva, May–June, available at: www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_182971.pdf (accessed 25 July 2012).
Ismail, F. (2007) “The G20 and NAMA11: The Role of Developing Countries in the WTO Doha Round,” lecture presented as part of Global Economic Governance's seminar series, Making Globalization Work for Developing Countries, 23 November, Oxford.
Jagan, L. (2000) “Burma Sanctions Imminent,” BBC News, 16 November 2000, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1027114.stm (accessed 19 July 2012).
Jayakumar, S. (2011) Diplomacy: A Singaporean Experience, Singapore: Straits Times Press.Google Scholar
Jetschke, A. (2009) “Institutionalizing ASEAN: Celebrating Europe through Network Governance,” Cambridge Review of International Relations 22(3): 407–426.Google Scholar
Jetschke, A. and Rüland, J. (2009) “Decoupling Rhetoric and Practice: The Cultural Limits of ASEAN Cooperation,” Pacific Review 22(1): 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetschke, A. and Portela, C. (2012) “ASEAN-EU Beziehungen: Von regionaler Integrationsförderung zur Sicherheitsrelevanz,” GIGA Focus, 12 (2012), Hamburg: German Institute for Global and Area Studies.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2013) “Mainland China's Place in the New World Regional Groupings.” In Lin, B. J. and Myers, J. T. (eds.), Forces for Change in Contemporary China, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. I. (1996) “Cultural Realism and Strategy in Maoist China.” In Katzenstein, P. J. (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 216–270.Google Scholar
Jones, D. M. and Smith, M. L. R. (2007) “Making Process, Not Progress: ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian Regional Order,” International Security 32(1): 148–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. (2008) “ASEAN's Albatross: ASEAN's Burma Policy, from Constructive Engagement to Critical Disengagement,” Asian Security 4(3): 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. (2012) ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen-Dahl, A. (1977) “The Emerging External Policies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN),” Australian Journal of Politics and History 24(1): 36–51.Google Scholar
Kasetsiri, C. (1976) The Rise of Ayudhya: A History of Siam in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Century, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katada, S. N. (2011) “Seeking a Place for East Asian Regionalism: Challenges and Opportunities under the Global Financial Crises,” Pacific Review 24(3): 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsumata, H. (2009) “ASEAN and Human Rights: Resisting Western Pressure or Emulating the West?Pacific Review 22(5): 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, P. and Sil, R. (2008) “Eclectic Theorizing in the Study and Practice of International Relations.” In Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–130.Google Scholar
Kausikan, B. (2005) “Some Fundamentals of Singapore's Foreign Policy.” In Koh, T. and Chang, L. L. (eds.), The Little Red Dot: Reflections by Singapore's Diplomats, Singapore: World Scientific and Institute of Policy Studies, pp. 103–110.Google Scholar
Keck, A. and Low, P. (2004) “Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When and How?,” Staff Working Paper ERSD-2004–03, World Trade Organization, Geneva; reprinted in Evenett, S. and Hoekman, B. (eds.), Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Co-operation, Washington, DC: Palgrave Macmillan and World Bank, 2005, pp. 147–188.
Khong, T. B. (2014) “Vietnam in International Institutions,” Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Kinder, D. R. and Sanders, L. M. (1996) Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kivimäki, Timo (2008) “Power, Interest or Culture: Is there a Paradigm that Explains ASEAN's Political Role Best?Pacific Review 21(4): 431–450.Google Scholar
Kng, C. M., Low, L. and Toh, M. H. (1988) “Trade Policy Option for Singapore.” In Ariff, M. and Tan, L.-H. (eds.) Asean Trade Policy Options: The Uruguay Round, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 132–168.Google Scholar
Koh, T. and Chang, L. L. (eds.) (2005) The Little Red Dot: Reflections by Singapore's Diplomats, Singapore: World Scientific and Institute of Policy Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, H. J. S. (2000) “The Autonomy Dilemma of Track Two Diplomacy in Southeast Asia,” Security Dialogue 31(3): 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuppuswamy, C. S. (2012) “Myanmar: By-Elections and the National League for Democracy (NLD),” South Asia Analysis Group, No. 4860 (13 January 2012), available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20120312133721/http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers49/paper4860.html (accessed 4 November 2014).
Kwa, A. (2003) Power Politics in the WTO, nd edn., Bangkok: Focus on the Global South.Google Scholar
Laatikainen, K. V. and Smith, K. E. (eds.) (2006) The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralisms, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, D. A. (1999) “Global Governance: A Relational Contracting Approach.” In Prakash, A. and Hart, J. A. (eds.), Globalization and Governance, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Laksmana, E. (2008) “Strategic Theory, Clausewitz, and the Indonesian Military,” Indonesian Quarterly 36(1): 86–106.Google Scholar
Legro, J. W. (2000) “The Transformation of Policy Ideas,” American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leifer, M. (1983) Indonesia's Foreign Policy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Leifer, M. (2000) Singapore's Foreign Policy. Coping with Vulnerability, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liang, M. (2005) “Evolution of the WTO Decision-Making Process,” 2005 Singapore Year Book of International Law and Contributors 22(1): 125–132.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. F. (1996) “The USA, The EEC, and The GATT: The Road Not Taken,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17(2): 533–538.Google Scholar
Mably, P. (2007) “The Role of Research on Trade Policy Changes Affecting the Developing World: Group of 33 Influence at the World Trade Organization,” Latin American Trade Network, FLACSO Working Paper 77, available at: www.redlatn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/wp-77.pdf (accessed 16 March 2014).
McCloud, D. G. (1976) “Indonesia in Southeast Asia: An Events Data Assessment of Indonesia's Primary Foreign Policy Environment,” Asian Forum 9: 61–83.Google Scholar
McCloud, D. G. (1995) Southeast Asia: Tradition and Modernity in the Contemporary World, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1994) “Organising Interests: Corporatism in Indonesian Politics,” Working Paper 43, Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University.
Madriaga-Quinsaat, S. (2013) “The Philippines Waltzes with the Big Boys: Coalition-building Strategy in the WTO,” Asian Survey 52(5): 570–594.Google Scholar
Mahbubani, K. (1993) “The Dangers of Decadence,” Foreign Affairs 72(4): 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahbubani, K. (1995) “The Pacific Way,” Foreign Affairs 74(1): 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahbubani, K. (1998) Can Asians Think? Understanding the Divide between East and West, Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Editions.Google Scholar
Mahbubani, K. (2005) “Singapore in the United Nations Security Council.” In Koh, T. and Chang, L. L. (eds.), The Little Red Dot: Reflections by Singapore's Diplomats, Singapore: World Scientific and Institute of Policy Studies, pp. 91–96.Google Scholar
Mahbubani, K. (2008) The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Power to the East, New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mangkusuwondo, S., Simandjuntak, D. and Surono, S. (1988) “Trade Policy Option for Indonesia.” In Ariff, M. and Tan, L.-H. (eds.), Asean Trade Policy Option: The Uruguay Round, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 38–64.Google Scholar
Manners, I. (2002) “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?,” Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, T. (2007) “Allianzen und Gruppen im Global Governance-System – Multilateralismus zwischen partikularen Interessen und universellen Anforderungen,” Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 2: 25–44.Google Scholar
Martin, L. G. (1987) The ASEAN Success Story: Social, Economic and Political Dimensions, Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
Meepiarn, W. (2009) “Bargaining Strategies for Developing Countries at the WTO: The Case of Thailand and the Agreement on Agriculture in the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick.
Meunier, S. (2005) Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, A. (2013) India's Foreign Policy and Regional Multilateralism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, R. S. and Mauzy, D. K. (1999) Malaysian Politics under Mahathir, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ministry of Labour, Republic of the Union of Myanmar (2012) “Myanmar Delegation Requests to 101st ILC to Fully Lift Sanctions Imposed on Myanmar,” available at: www.mol.gov.mm/en/ilc-myanmar-delegation/ (accessed 25 July 2012).
Montes, M. F. and Magno, F. A. (1997) “Trade and Environmental Diplomacy: Strategic Options for ASEAN,” Pacific Affairs 70(3): 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Rome to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, C. E. (2006) “Track 1/Track 2 Symbiosis in Asia-Pacific Regionalism.” In Nesadurai, H. E. S. (ed.), Globalization and Economic Security in East Asia: Governance and Institutions, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 200–217.Google Scholar
Muhibat, S. F. (2006) “D-8 Summit, Regional Issues and Indonesia's International Diplomacy,” Indonesian Quarterly 34(2): 132–142.Google Scholar
Nabbs-Keller, G. (2013) “Reforming Indonesia's Foreign Ministry: Ideas, Organizations and Leadership,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 35(1): 56–82.Google Scholar
Nair, D. (2010) “Do Stated Goals Matter? Regional Institutions in East Asia and the Dynamic of Unstated Goals,” Working Paper 199, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Narine, S. (2002) Explaining ASEAN, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Narine, S. (2008) “Forty Years of ASEAN: A Historical Review,” Pacific Review 21(4): 411–429.Google Scholar
Narlikar, A. (2003) International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the GATT and WTO, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narlikar, A. (2006) “Peculiar Chauvinism or Strategic Calculation?: Explaining the Negotiating Strategy of a Rising India,” International Affairs 82(1): 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narlikar, A. and Tussie, D. (2004) “The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO,” World Economy 27(7): 947–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguitragool, P. (2011a) Environmental Cooperation in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's Regime for Transboundary Haze Pollution, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nguitragool, P. (2011b) “Negotiating the Haze Treaty: Rationality and Institutions in the Negotiations for the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution (2002),” Asian Survey 51(2): 356–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguitragool, P. (2012) “God-King and Indonesia: Renegotiating the Boundaries between Western and Non-Western Perspectives on Foreign Policy,” Pacific Affairs 85(4): 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguitragool, P. (2013) “Indonesia, the West and International Politics: A Survey of Indonesian Student Perceptions of Self and Others in International Relations,” Occasional Paper Series 16, Southeast Asian Studies, University of Freiburg.
Niksch, L. A. and Weiss, M. A. (2008) “Burma: Economic Sanctions,” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RS22737 (updated 30 January 2008), available at: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/101738.pdf (accessed 12 July 2012).
Novotny, D. (2010) Torn Between America and China: Elite Perceptions and Indonesian Foreign Policy, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, J. S. (1967) “Central American Regional Integration,” International Conciliation 562 (March): 5–66.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. (1971) “Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model.” In Lindberg, L. N. and Scheingold, S. A. (eds.), Regional Integration: Theory and Research, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 191–231.Google Scholar
Nye, J. S. (1988) “Soft Power,” Foreign Policy 80: 153–171.Google Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2002) “Creating Data on International Negotiation Strategies, Alternatives and Outcomes,” International Negotiation 7: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2005) “Chairing a WTO Negotiation,” Journal of International Economic Law 8(2): 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, J. S. (2010) “Three Islands of Knowledge about Negotiation in International Organizations,” Journal of European Public Policy 17(5): 619–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, N. D. (1991) The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Pangestu, M., Soesastro, H. and Ahmad, M. (1992) “A New Look at Intra-ASEAN Economic Co-operation,” ASEAN Economic Bulletin 8(3): 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panke, D. (2013a) Unequal Actors in Equalizing Institutions: Negotiations in the United Nations General Assembly, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panke, D (2013b) “Regional Power Revisited: How to Explain Difference in Coherency and Success of Regional Organizations in the United Nations General Assembly,” International Negotiation 18: 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perwita, A. A. B. (2007) Indonesia and the Muslim World: Islam and Secularism in the Foreign Policy of Soeharto and Beyond, Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
Pitsuwan, S. (2012) อาเซียน รู้ไว้ได้เปรียบแน่ [Competitive Advantage in Knowing ASEAN]. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing.Google Scholar
Prys, M. (2010) “Hegemony, Domination Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood,” International Studies Review 12(4): 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pura, R. (1988) “Doubts Over Heavy Industrialization Strategy.” In Jomo, K. S. (ed.), Mahathir's Economic Policies, Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Social Analysis, pp. 38–43.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1988) “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization 42(3): 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, C. (1987) “The World Asked to Liberalise in Tropical Products,” 4 March 1987, docsonline.wto.org (no longer available).
Raghavan, C. (2001) “Agri-Talks Mark Time, for End of Peace Clause not New Round?,” Third World Network, available at: www.twnside.org.sg/title/agri.htm (accessed 8 January 2013).
Rana, P. B. (2011) “Asian Monetary Fund: Getting Nearer,” RSIS Commentaries 79/2011, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Ravenhill, J. (2001) APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, J. (2008) “Fighting Irrelevance: An Economic Community with ASEAN Characteristics,” Pacific Review 21(4): 469–488.Google Scholar
Reeve, D. (1985) Golkar of Indonesia: An Alternative to the Party System, Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, A. (1998) “Political ‘Tradition’ in Indonesia: The One and the Many,” Asian Studies Review 22(1): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, D. (2013) “Brasiliens Rolle in Südamerika: Detached Power or Regional Dominator?,” term paper, Department of Political Science, University of Freiburg.
Reiterer, M. (1996) “The First Ministerial Conference of the WTO: The Road to Singapore,” Aussenwirtschaft 3: 383–416.Google Scholar
Rhinard, M. and Kaeding, M. (2006) “The International Bargaining Power of the European Union in ‘Mixed’ Competence Negotiations: The Case of the 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(5): 1023–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, M. C. (2001) A History of Modern Indonesia since c.1300, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Risse, T. (2000) “‘Let's Argue!’ Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54(1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2007) “Affinity and Trust in Southeast Asia: A Regional Survey,” paper presented at the ASEAN 40th Anniversary Conference, Ideas and Institutions: Building an ASEAN Community?, jointly organized by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) and the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 31 July–1 August, available at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/singapur/04601/2007-3/chris.pdf (accessed 14 August 2010).
Roberts, C. (2010a) “Is Myanmar Changing or Has Myanmar Changed Us?,” paper presented at the 24th Asia-Pacific Roundtable, 7–9 June, Kuala Lumpur, available at: http://ebookbrowse.com/christopher-roberts-pdf-d57699775 (accessed 25 July 2012).
Roberts, C. (2010b) ASEAN's Myanmar Crisis: Challenges to the Pursuit of a Security Community, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
RoblesJr., A. C. (2004) Political Economy of Interregional Relations: ASEAN and the EU, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Roloff, R. (2001) Europa, Amerika und Asien zwischen Globalisierung und Regionalisierung. Das interregionale Konzert und die ökonomische Dimension internationaler Politik, Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. (1992) “Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics.” In Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E.-O. (eds.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüland, J. (2000) “ASEAN and the Asian Crisis: Theoretical and Practical Consequences for Southeast Asian Regionalism,” Pacific Review 13(3): 421–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüland, J. (2002) “APEC, ASEAN and EAEC: A Tale of Two Cultures of Cooperation.” In Rüland, J., Manske, E. and Draguhn, W. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC): The First Decade, London: RoutledgeCurzon, pp. 40–71.Google Scholar
Rüland, J. (2009) “Deepening ASEAN Cooperation through Democratization? The Indonesian Legislature and Foreign Policymaking,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 9(3): 373–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüland, J. (2010) “Balancers, Multilateral Utilities or Identity Builders? International Relations and the Study of Interregionalism,” Journal of European Public Policy 17(8): 1268–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüland, J. (2011) “Southeast Asian Regionalism and Global Governance: ‘Multilateral Utility’ or ‘Hedging Utility?’,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 33(1): 83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüland, J. (2012a) “The Limits of Democratizing Interest Representation: ASEAN's Regional Corporatism and Normative Challenges,” European Journal of International Relations, DOI 10.1177/1354066112455289, published online 16 July.
Rüland, J. (2012b) “The Rise of ‘Diminished Multilateralism’: East Asian and European Forum Shopping in Global Governance,” Asia-Europe Journal 10(1): 255–270.Google Scholar
Rüland, J. (2014) “Constructing Regionalism Domestically: Local Actors and Foreign Policymaking in Newly Democratized Indonesia,” Foreign Policy Analysis 10(2): 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salih, K., Piej, M. H. and Sahathavan, M. (1988) “Trade Policy Option for Malaysia.” In Ariff, M. and Tan, L.-H. (eds.), ASEAN Trade Policy Options: The Uruguay Round, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 65–103.Google Scholar
Sally, R. (2004) Southeast Asia in the WTO, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sally, R. and Sen, R. (2005) “Trade Policies in Southeast Asia in the Wider Asian Perspective,” World Economy 34(4): 568–601.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2006) “Prozessanalyse.” In Behnke, J., Gschwend, T., Schindler, D. and Schnapp, K.-U. (eds.), Methoden der Politikwissenschaft: Neuere qualitative und quantitative Analyseverfahren, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 273–285.Google Scholar
Schirm, S. A. (1997) “Transnationale Globalisierung und regionale Kooperation. Ein politikökonomischer Ansatz zur Erklärung internationaler Zusammenarbeit in Europa und den Amerikas,” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 4(1): 69–106.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1995) Wörterbuch zur Politik, Stuttgart: Kröner Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2010) “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’,” European Political Science Review 2: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1969) “Three Neo-Functional Hypotheses about International Integration,” International Organization 23: 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1971) “A Revised Theory of Regional Integration.” In Lindberg, L. N. and Scheingold, S. A. (eds.), Regional Integration: Theory and Research, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 232–264.Google Scholar
Schwarz, A. (1994) A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Severino, R. C. (2006) Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the Former ASEAN Secretary General, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, S. W. (2002) “Evaluating Track II Approaches to Security Diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific: The CSCAP Experience,” Pacific Review 15(2): 167–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöstedt, G. (1977) The External Role of the European Community, Westmead: Gower Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. L. (2000) “Indonesia's Foreign Policy under Abdurrahman Wahid: Radical or Status Quo State?,Contemporary Southeast Asia 22(3): 498–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. E. (2006) “Speaking with One Voice? European Union Co-ordination on Human Rights Issues at the United Nations,” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(1): 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snitwongse, K. (1989) “Interaction and Collaboration of the EC and ASEAN in the UN System and International Conferences.” In Schiavone, G. (ed.), Western Europe and South-East Asia. Co-operation or Competition?, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 229–258.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. (2000) From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict, New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Sohn, I. (2007) East Asia's Counterweight Strategy: Asian Financial Cooperation and Evolving International Monetary Order, New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference of Trade and Development.Google Scholar
Solidum, E. (1974) Towards a Southeast Asian Community, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
Spiller, R. (2008) Das Management multilateraler internationaler Verhandlungen. Eine Untersuchung von UN-Konferenzen zur Verabschiedung internationaler Konventionen, Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strezhnev, A. and Voeten, E. (2013) “United Nations General Assembly Voting Data,” UNF:5:NpHV5DXWPNWMWOrLGTjQYA==Erik Voeten [Distributor] V5 [Version], http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/12379 (accessed 13 January 2014).
Stone, D. (2000) “Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes,” Governance 13(1): 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, R. (2008) “The ASEAN Alternative? Ideas, Institutions and the Challenge to ‘Global’ Governance,” Pacific Review 21(4): 451–468.Google Scholar
Sukma, R. (2000) “Indonesia and Non-Intervention: Debate in Southeast Asia.” In Dickens, D. and Wilson-Roberts, G. (eds.), Non-Intervention and State Sovereignty in the Asia-Pacific, Wellington: Centre for Strategic Studies, pp. 86–96.Google Scholar
Sukma, R. (2012) “The ASEAN Political and Security Community (APSC): Opportunities and Constraints for R2P in Southeast Asia,” Pacific Review 25(1): 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunardi, R. M. (2004) Pembinaan Ketahanan Bangsa: Dalam Rangka Memperkokoh Keutuhan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Kuaternita Adidarma.Google Scholar
Tallberg, J. (2008) Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, S. S. (2012) “ASEAN, the United Nations and the Security of Southeast Asia: Problems, Prospects and Paradox.” In de Lombaerde, P., Baert, F. and Felício, T. (eds.), The United Nations and the Regions: Third World Report on Regional Integration, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 157–166.Google Scholar
Tay, S. (2013) “Growing an ASEAN Voice?: A Common Platform in Global and Regional Governance,” ERIA Discussion Paper 2013–16: Economic Research Institute of ASEAN and East Asia, Jakarta.
Taylor, R. H. (1987) The State in Burma, London: C. Hurst.Google Scholar
Thambipillai, P. and Saravanamuttu, J. (1985) ASEAN Negotiations: Two Insights, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Than, M. and Gates, C. L. (2001) ASEAN Enlargement: Impacts and Implications, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Affairs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. and Orden, D. (2004) “Agricultural Policies in Indonesia: Producer Support Estimates 1985–2003,” MTID Discussion Paper No. 78, Markets, Trade and Institutions Division of the International Food Policy Research Institute, available at: www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/mtidp78.pdf (accessed 2 November 2012).
Thomas, V. and Wang, Y. (1995) “Structural Adjustment: Gradualism or Big Approach?” In Umali-Deininger, D. and Maguire, C. (eds.), Agriculture in Liberalizing Economies: Changing Roles for Governments, Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 25–58.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. C. (2012) “Anthropology in Southeast Asia: National Tradition and Transnational Practices,” Asian Journal of Social Science 40: 664–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thongthep, Mechai (1993) Ramakien: The Thai Ramayana, Bangkok: Naga Books.Google Scholar
Thurman, J. E. (1996) “Employment, Labor Standards, and the Social Clause.” In Yue, C. S. and Tan, J. L.-H. (eds.), ASEAN in the WTO: Challenges and Responses, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 58–50.Google Scholar
Tongthep, M. (1993) Ramakien: The Thai Ramayama, Bangkok: Naga Books.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2009) “Implementing the Responsibility to Protect,” Report of the Secretary General: www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/63/677 (accessed 16 July 2014).
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2011) Third Committee, “Summary Record of the 47th Meeting Held at Headquarters, New York, on Thursday, 18 November 2010.”
University of Helsinki (2006) An Evaluation of ASEM in its First Decade and an Exploration of its Future Possibilities, Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Network for European Studies.
von Lübke, C. (2012) “Striking the Right Balance: Economic Concentration and Local Government Performance in Indonesia and the Philippines,” European Journal of East Asian Studies 11(1): 17–44.Google Scholar
Wallensteen, P., Staibano, C. and Eriksson, M. (2004) “Routes to Democracy in Burma/Myanmar: The Uppsala Pilot Study on Dialogue and International Strategies,” available at: http://pcr.uu.se/digitalAssets/112/112143_burmareport_april_8.pdf (accessed 24 July 2012).
Walton, R. E. and McKersie, R. B. (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of Social Interaction Systems, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Warr, P. and Kohpaiboon, A. (2007) “Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Thailand,” Agricultural Distortions Working Paper 25, available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRADERESEARCH/Resources/544824-1146153362267/Thailand_0308rev.pdf (accessed 5 November 2012).
Weinstein, F. B. (1976) Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Dilemma of Dependence: From Sukarno to Suharto, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, A. N. (2004) Power Plays: Wayang Golek Puppet Theater of West Java, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Wesley, M. (1999) “The Asian Crisis and the Adequacy of Regional Institutions,” Contemporary Southeast Asia 21(1): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalley, J. (1996) “Developing Countries and System Strengthening in the Uruguay Round.” In Will, M. and Winteres, L. A. (eds.), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Widjajanto, A. (2008) “Transforming Indonesia's Armed Forces,” available at: http://lesperssi.org/id/conference/workshop-mainmenu-6/5-security-sector-in-democratic-oversight/43-transforming-indonesias-armed-forces (accessed 4 November 2014).
Wilkinson, R. (2007) The WTO: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wisma Putra (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia) (2009) “Strategic Plan, 2009–2015,” Putrajaya: Wisma Putra, available at: www.kln.gov.my/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=bf7282c4-3cad-49cd-a525-15a3e67702a0&groupId=10136 (accessed 17 March 2014).
Witcher, T. (2010) “UN Chief Urges Asia Nations to Pressure Myanmar,” 26 September, available at: http://taungzalatnews.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/un-chief-urges-asia-nations-to-pressure.html (accessed 6 November 2014).
World Bank (2009) “Cambodia Trade Brief,” World Trade Indicators 2009/10: Country Trade Briefs, Washington, DC: World Bank, available at: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/wti/docs/Cambodia_brief.pdf (accessed 13 November 2012).
Wouters, J. and Burnay, M. (2011) “The EU and Asia in the United Nations Security Council,” Working Paper 78, Centre for Global Governance Studies, Leuven.
World Trade Organization (2000) “Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in World Agricultural Trade,” G/AG/NG/W/55, 10 November, available at: http://docsonline.wto.org/imrd/directdoc.asp?DDFDocuments/t/G/AG/NGW55.doc (accessed 13 November 2012).
World Trade Organization (2013) “Public Stockholding for Food Security Purposes” (Draft Ministerial Decision), WT/MIN(13)/W/10, 6 December, available at: https://mc9.wto.org/system/files/documents/w10_1.pdf (accessed 13 March 2014).
Wunderlich, J. U. (2012) “The EU as Actor Sui Generis? A Comparison of EU and ASEAN Actorness,” Journal of Common Market Studies 50(4): 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, D. K. (1984) Thailand: A Short History, London and Bangkok: Yale University Press/Thai Wattana Panich Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Wyatt-Walter, A. (1995) “Regionalism, Globalization and the World Economic Order.” In Fawcett, L. and Hurrell, A. (eds.), Regionalism in World Politics, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 74–120.Google Scholar
Yeo, L. H. (2003) Asia and Europe: The Development and Different Dimensions of ASEM, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, H. (2007) Regional Integration and Business Interests: A Comparative Study of Europe and Southeast Asia, European Journal of East Asian Studies 6(2): 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. (1991) “Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society,” International Organization 45(3): 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangl, B. and Zürn, M. (2004) “Make Law, Not War: Internationale und transnationale Verrechtlichung als Baustein für Global Governance.” In Zangl, B. and Zürn, M. (eds.), Verrechtlichung: Baustein für Global Governance?, Bonn: Verlag J. H. W. Dietz Nachfolger, pp. 12–46.Google Scholar
Zimmer, H. (1976) Philosophien und Religionen Indiens, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (1992) Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik. Grundlegung und Anwendung des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Paruedee Nguitragool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, Jűrgen Rűland, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316218600.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Paruedee Nguitragool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, Jűrgen Rűland, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316218600.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Paruedee Nguitragool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, Jűrgen Rűland, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316218600.010
Available formats
×