We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
The previous chapters examined ASEAN's cohesion in international forums, mainly the United Nations (UN) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). We came to the conclusion that in all three major phases of negotiation (Chapter 4) and with regard to five major negotiation strategies, ASEAN's cohesiveness (Chapter 5) is quite in line with what we predicted at the end of Chapter 3 after studying the world views of foreign policy elites, how these cognitive dispositions shaped the grouping's repository of cooperation norms and how the latter reflected on the grouping's organizational structure. ASEAN's collective behavior in international forums is ambiguous and does not reveal stable long-term trends towards greater cohesiveness. It more resembles a caucus than a quasi-bloc, especially in tangible areas of negotiation such as norms and rules of the international order, trade and climate change, and in the application of crucial negotiation strategies such as the quest for leadership positions, coalition-building and, to a lesser extent, forum shopping.
Yet we are aware that these findings rest thus far on a rather broad and eclectic analysis. The subsequent two in-depth case studies have the function of examining the preliminary evidence derived from Chapter 5. We chose, as outlined in the methodology, two cases that are characterized by considerable variation in outcome. In the first case, the material distribution of values is up for negotiation, in the second case, a normative or ideational issue.
Case 1 ASEAN and GATT/WTO negotiations on agricultural and tropical products
Background: agriculture in the global trade regime
Although it is difficult to determine exactly when agriculture became an agenda for trade negotiation, trade in agricultural products was already part of the discussions at the time of the establishment of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947. Despite an increased recognition of the problems related to agricultural products from developing countries in the 1950s, little progress had been made in reforming agricultural trade.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
