Adam, J.-P. (1982) “Groma et chorobate: Exercices de topographie antique,” MEFRA 94: 1003–29.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2016) An Anthology of Informal Latin, 200 BC–AD 900, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Agache, S. (1998) “Construction dramatique et humour dans le Traité d’agriculture de Varron,” in Trédé, M. and Hoffmann, P., eds., Le rire des anciens, Paris: 201–30.Google Scholar

Ahrens, K. (1972) Columella: Über Landwirtschaft. Ein Lehr- und Handbuch der gesamten Acker- und Viehwirtschaft aus dem 1. Jh. u. Z., Berlin.Google Scholar

Alfieri, N. (1976–7) “Per la topografia storica di Fanum Fortunae (Fano),” RSA 6–7: 147–71.Google Scholar

Alfonsi, L. and Ronconi, A., eds. (1982) Plinio il Vecchio sotto il profilo storico e letterario, Como.Google Scholar

Allen, J. (2005) “The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology,” in Frede, D. and Inwood, B., eds., Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, Cambridge: 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, J. (2020) “Reason, Experience, and Art: The Gorgias and On Ancient Medicine,” in Taub, L., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science, Cambridge: 39–57.Google Scholar

Ambaglio, D. (1981) “Il trattato Sul comandante di Onasandro,” Athenaeum 59: 353–77.Google Scholar

Amsler, M. (1989) Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. C. (1997) Roman Architecture and Society, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

André, J. (1952) “Contribution au vocabulaire de la viticulture: Les noms des cépages,” REL 30: 126–56.Google Scholar

André, J. (1958) Pline l’Ancien: Histoire naturelle. Livre XIV, Paris.Google Scholar

André, J. (2010) Les noms des plantes dans la Rome antique, 2nd ed., Paris.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1985) “Le prologue scientifique et la rhétorique: Les préfaces de Vitruve,” BAGB 44: 375–84.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1987a) “La rhétorique dans les prefaces de Vitruve: Le statut culturel de la science,” in Boldrini, S, ed., Filologia e forme letterarie, Urbino: III 265–89.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1987b) “Les écoles philosophiques aux deux premiers siècles de l’Empire,” ANRW II.36.1: 5–77.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1994) “Littérature technique et héritage de la rhétorique cicéronienne chez Columelle,” in Dangel, J., ed., Grammaire et rhétorique: Notion de romanité, Strasbourg: 179–96 [= “Littérature technique et héritage de la théorie cicéronienne chez Columelle,” in Ktèma 14 (1989): 255–72].Google Scholar

Angier, T. (2010) Technē in Aristotle’s Ethics: Crafting the Moral Life, London.Google Scholar

Argoud, G. and. Guillaumin, J.-Y. (1997) Les Pneumatiques d’Héron d’Alexandrie, Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar

Aßfahl, G. (1932) Vergleich und Metapher bei Quintilian, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Ash, H. B. (1930) L. Iuni Moderati Columellae rei rusticae liber decimus: De cultu hortorum, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2011) “Pliny the Elder’s Attitude to Warfare,” in Gibson and Morello 2011: 1–19.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (2007) Griechische Wissenschaftstexte: Formen, Funktionen, Differen-zierungsgeschichten, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Asper, M. ed. (2013) Writing Science: Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor, Oxford.Google Scholar

Baader, G. (1960) “Überlieferungsprobleme des A. Cornelius Celsus,” Forschungen und Fortschritte 34: 215–18.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1963) “Columella’s Sources and How He Used Them,” Latomus 22: 785–91.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1990) “The Date, Identity, and Career of Vitruvius,” Latomus 49: 425–34.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1992) “The Career and Work of Scribonius Largus,” RhM new series 135: 74–82.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1994) “Notes on the De aquis of Frontinus,” in Deroux, C., ed., Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 7, Brussels: 484–506.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (2005) “Stylistic Notes on the Elder Pliny’s Preface,” Latomus 64: 91–5.Google Scholar

Bardon, H. (1952–6) La littérature latine inconnue, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1948) “Zu den Schriften des Cornelius Celsus und des alten Cato,” WJA 3: 117–32.Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1960) “Die Enzyklopädie des Cornelius Celsus,” Philologus 104: 236–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barwick, K. (1963) Das rednerische Bildungsideal Ciceros, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayer, E. (1947) “Onasandros: Die Entstehungszeit des Strategikos,” WJA 2: 86–90.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (1992) Roman Nature: The Thought of Pliny the Elder, Oxford.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2005) The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History, Book 7, Oxford.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2007) “Situating Nature’s Wonders in Pliny’s Natural History,” in Bispham et al. 2007: 19–40.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2011) “The Curious Eye of the Elder Pliny,” in Gibson and Morello 2011: 71–88.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2013) “Labores pro bono publico: The Burdensome Mission of Pliny’s Natural History,” in König and Woolf 2013a: 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beagon, M. (2018) “Science and Medicine in the Roman Encyclopedists: Patronage for Praxis,” in Keyser and Scarborough 2018: 655–76.Google Scholar

Beare, R. (1978) “Were Bailiffs Ever Free Born?” CQ 28: 398–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaujeu, J. (1950) Pline l’Ancien: Histoire naturelle. Livre II, Paris.Google Scholar

Becher, G. (1897) De Lucii Junii Moderati Columellae vita et scriptis, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Beekes, R. (2010) Etymological Dictionary of Greek. 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar

Bees, R. (2010) “Die Einheit von Redekunst und Philosophie: Poseidonios bei Cicero, De oratore 3.19–24?” Hermes 138: 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrends, O. (1992) “Bodenhoheit und privates Bodeneigentum im Grenzwesen Roms,” in Behrends and Capogrossi Colognesi 1992: 192–280.Google Scholar

Behrends, O. and Colognesi, L. Capogrossi, eds. (1992) Die römische Feldmesskunst: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilisationsgeschichte Roms, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Behrends, O., Clavel-Lévêque, M., Conso, D., von Cranach, P., Gonzalès, A., Guillaumin, J.-Y., Pena, M. J., and Ratti, S. (1998) Frontin: L’œuvre gromatique, Luxembourg.Google Scholar

Behrends, O., Clavel-Lévêque, M., Conso, D., Gonzalès, A., Guillaumin, J.-Y., and Ratti, S. (2000) Hygin: L’œuvre gromatique, Luxembourg.Google Scholar

Bendz, G. (1938) Die Echtheitsfrage des vierten Buches der frontinschen Strategemata, Lund.Google Scholar

Bengtson, H. (1962) “Die griechische Polis bei Aeneas Tacticus,” Historia 11: 458–68.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. E. and McElwain, M. B. (1925) Frontinus: Stratagems. Aqueducts of Rome, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Béranger, J. (1953) Recherches sur l’aspect idéologique du principat, Basel.Google Scholar

Berger, A. (1953) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Berrey, M. (2017) “Ancient Medical Friendship,” in Groton, A. H., ed., Ab omni parte beatus: Classical Essays in Honor of James M. May, Mundelein, IL: 75–96.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2009) The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Berthault, F. (2009) “Biturica, le vin des Bituriges,” in Brun, J.-P., Poux, M., and Tchernia, A., eds., Le vin: Nectar des dieux, génie des hommes, 2nd ed., Gollion: 236–8.Google Scholar

Bertoni, D. (2014) The Cultivation and Conceptualization of Exotic Plants in the Greek and Roman Worlds, unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Bertoni, D. (2017) “Geometry and Genre in Columella,” AJPh 138: 527–54.Google Scholar

Bettalli, M. (2010) “Il militare,” in Zecchini, G., ed., Lo storico antico: Mestieri e figure sociali, Bari: 215–29.Google Scholar

Bianchi, O., Thévenaz, O., and Mudry, P., eds. (2004) Conceptions et représentations de l’extraordinaire dans le monde antique, Bern.Google Scholar

Bilić, T. (2012) “Crates of Mallos and Pytheas of Massalia: Examples of Homeric Exegesis in Terms of Mathematical Geography,” TAPhA 142: 295–328.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1953) Roman Britain and the Roman Army: Collected Papers, Kendal.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2005) The Roman Government of Britain, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bispham, E. (2007) “Pliny the Elder’s Italy,” in Bispham et al. 2007: 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bispham, E., Rowe, G., and Matthews, E., eds. (2007) Vita vigilia est: Essays in Honour of Barbara Levick, London.Google Scholar

Blandenet, M. (2009) “Le savoir agronomique et sa transmission à Rome à la fin de la république,” Camenulae 3: 1–19.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (1995) “Philodemus on the Technicity of Rhetoric,” in Obbink, D., ed., Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace, Oxford: 177–88.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (2003) “Atomist Rhetoric in Philodemus,” Cronache ercolanesi 33: 69–88.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (2009) “Philosophia and technē: Epicureans on the Arts,” in Warren, J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge: 216–33.Google Scholar

Bliquez, L. J. (2014) The Tools of Asclepius: Surgical Instruments in Greek and Roman Times, Leiden.Google Scholar

Bloch, R. (2010) Moses und der Mythos: Die Auseinandersetzung mit der griechischen Mythologie bei jüdisch-hellenistischen Autoren, Leiden.Google Scholar

Bodel, J. (2015) “The Publication of Pliny’s Letters,” in Marchesi, I, ed., Pliny the Book-Maker: Betting on Posterity in the Epistles, Oxford: 13–108.Google Scholar

Boëthius, A. (1939) “Vitruvius and the Roman Architecture of his Age,” in Dragma, Martino P. Nilsson, A. D. IV id. Iul. MCMXXXIX dedicatum, Lund: 114–43.Google Scholar

Bohlin, E. (2009) Geometry in Varro, Cicero, and Vitruvius: A Philological Study, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Boldrer, F. (1996) L. Iuni Moderati Columellae rei rusticae liber decimus (carmen de cultu hortorum), Pisa.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. (2018) “Two Conceptions of Practical Skill (τέχνη) in Aristotle,” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D., ed., Aristotle: Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought, Berlin: 279–96.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. (2021) “Technê and Empeiria: Aristotle on Practical Knowledge,” in Johansen 2021: 131–65.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1957–8) P. Ovidius Naso: Die Fasten, 2 vols., Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1969–86) P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen, 7 vols., Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny, London.Google Scholar

Borca, F. (2003) Luoghi, corpi, costumi: Determinismo ambientale ed etnografia antica, Rome.Google Scholar

Boscherini, S. (1970) Lingua e scienza greca nel De agri cultura di Catone, Rome.Google Scholar

Boscherini, S. (1986) “Considerazioni sulla laus Italiae di Varrone (De re rust. 1, 2, 3–8),” in Studi in onore di Adelmo Barigazzi, Rome: I 101–9.Google Scholar

Boscherini, S. (1993) “La medicina in Catone e Varrone,” ANRW II.37.1: 729–55.Google Scholar

Bradley, K. (1994) Slavery and Society at Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brain, P. (1986) Galen on Bloodletting: A Study of the Origins, Development and Validity of His Opinions, with a Translation of the Three Works, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bréguet, E. (1969) “Urbi et orbi: Un cliché et un thème,” in Dumortier-Bibauw, J., ed., Hommages à Marcel Renard, Brussels: I 140–52.Google Scholar

Brehaut, E. (1933) Cato the Censor on Farming, New York.Google Scholar

Bretin-Chabrol, M. (2010) “Le Virgile de Columelle: Une lecture optimiste des Géorgiques,” Mosaïque 3: 29–42.Google Scholar

Bretin-Chabrol, M. (2012) L’arbre et la lignée: Métaphores végétales de la filiation et de l’alliance en latin classique, Grenoble.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. (2005) “Epinomis: Authenticity and Authorship,” in Döring, K., Erler, M., and Schorn, S., eds., Pseudoplatonica, Stuttgart: 9–24.Google Scholar

Brown, F. E. (1963) “Vitruvius and the Liberal Art of Architecture,” Bucknell Review 11.4: 99–107.Google Scholar

Brown, N. G. (2019) “A res rustica for All the People? Varro, uillatica pastio, and the Villa Publica,” TAPhA 149: 317–51.Google Scholar

Bruère, R. T. (1956) “Pliny the Elder and Virgil,” CPh 51: 228–46.Google Scholar

Brunet, C., Conso, D., Gonzalès, A., Guard, T., Guillaumin, J.-Y., and Sensal, C. (2008) Libri coloniarum (Livres des colonies), Besançon.Google Scholar

Bruno, M. G. T. (1969) Il lessico agricolo latino, 2nd ed., Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1972) “Cn. Tremellius Scrofa the Agronomist,” CR 22: 304–8.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1973) “Aspects of the Social Thought of Dio Chrysostom and of the Stoics,” PCPhS 19: 9–34.Google Scholar

Bruun, C. F. M. (1991) The Water Supply of Ancient Rome: A Study of Roman Imperial Administration, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Bruun, C. F. M. (2013) “Warum verfasste Frontin sein Werk über die Wasserversorgung Roms?” in Letzner 2013: 151–8.Google Scholar

Bubnov, N. (1899) Gerberti postea Silvestri II papae Opera mathematica (972–1003), Berlin.Google Scholar

Bürge, A. (1990) “Der mercennarius und die Lohnarbeit,” ZRG 107: 80–136.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (transl. E. L. Minar, Jr.), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Butler, T. (2003) “Empeiria in Aristotle,” SJPh 41: 329–50.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1975) “Horace, Epode 2, Tibullus I, 1 and Rhetorical Praise of the Countryside,” Museum Philologum Londiniense 1: 79–91.Google Scholar

Callipo, M. (2011) Dionisio Trace e la tradizione grammaticale, Acireale.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (1973) Vitruve: De l’architecture. Livre VIII, Paris.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (1982) “La prose du De architectura de Vitruve.” ANRW II.30.1: 696–722 [cited in pagination of Callebat 2017a: 311–47].Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (1989) “Organisation et structures du De architectura de Vitruve,” in Geertman and de Jong 1989: 34–38 [cited in pagination of Callebat 2017a: 75–85].Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (1994) “Rhétorique et architecture dans le De architectura de Vitruve,” in Le projet de Vitruve (q. v.): 31–46 [cited in pagination of Callebat 2017a: 87–104].Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (1997) “Encyclopédie et architecture,” in Bouffartigue, J. and Mélonio, F., eds., L’entreprise encyclopédique: Études, Nanterre: 169–181 [cited in pagination of Callebat 2017a: 105–16].Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (1998) “‘Architecte’: Histoire d’un mot,” in Callebat, L., ed., Histoire de l’architecte, Paris: 11–18 [cited in pagination of Callebat 2017a: 13–30].Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (2001) “Fabrica et ratiocinatio dans le De architectura de Vitruve,” in Courrént and Thomas 2001: 145–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callebat, L. (2003) “Les matériaux de l’architecte,” in Ciotta, G., ed., Vitruvio nella cultura architettonica antica, medievale e moderna, Genoa: I 88–95 [cited in pagination of Callebat 2017a: 145–56].Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (2005) “Le traité d’architecture vitruvien: Problème d’identité,” in Lafon, X. and Sauron, G., eds., Théorie et pratique de l’architecture romaine, Aix-en-Provence: 17–22 [cited in pagination of Callebat 2017a: 61–73].Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (2011) “Le savant et le livre,” in Jouanna et al. 2011: 473–80.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (2017a) Le De architectura de Vitruve, Paris.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (2017b) “Fabrica et ratiocinatio,” in Callebat 2017a: 129–44.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (2017c) “Biologie, géographie et architecture: La théorie des tempéraments dans le De architectura de Vitruve,” in Callebat 2017a: 157–66.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. and Fleury, P. (1986) Vitruve: De l’architecture. Livre X, Paris.Google Scholar

Callebat, L., Gros, P., and Jacquemard, C.. (2003) Vitruve: De l’architecture. Livre II, 2nd ed., Paris.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G. (2012) “The Desire to Know: Metaphysics A1,” in Steel, C., ed., Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha, Oxford: 1–42.Google Scholar

Camoletto, S. (1990) “Sul linguaggio traumatologico di Celso,” BStudLat 20: 14–24.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (1987) “Teach Yourself How to Be a General,” JRS 77: 13–29.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (1995) “Sharing out Land: Two Passages in the Corpus agrimensorum Romanorum,” CQ 45: 540–6.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (1996) “Shaping the Rural Environment: Surveyors in Ancient Rome,” JRS 86: 74–99.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (2000) The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors, London.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (2004) Greek and Roman Military Writers: Selected Readings, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, B. (2005) “Surveyors, Topography, and Definitions of Landholding in Ancient Rome,” in Conso et al. 2005: 173–81.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. L. (2003) Lucretius on Creation and Evolution: A Commentary on De rerum natura, Book 5, Lines 772–1104, Oxford.Google Scholar

Canter, H. V. (1938) “Praise of Italy in Classical Authors, I.” CJ 33: 457–70.Google Scholar

Canter, H. V. (1939) “Praise of Italy in Classical Authors, II.” CJ 34: 396–409.Google Scholar

Cantor, M. (1875) Die römischen Agrimensoren und ihre Stellung in der Geschichte der Feldmesskunst: Eine historisch-mathematische Untersuchung, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Capitani, U. (1966) “La produzione letteraria di Aulo Cornelio Celso alla luce di un discusso passo dell’Institutio oratoria,” Maia 18: 138–55.Google Scholar

Capitani, U. (1967) “Note critiche al testo del De medicina di Celso,” SILTA 39: 112–64.Google Scholar

Capitani, U. (1970) “Note critiche al testo del De medicina di Celso (continuazione),” SILTA 42: 5–93.Google Scholar

Capitani, U. (1974) “Il recupero di un passo di Celso in un codice del De medicina conservato a Toledo,” Maia 26: 161–212.Google Scholar

Capitani, U. (1980) “Cornelius Celsus, mediocri uir ingenio … : In margine a recenti interpretazioni di un giudizio di Quintiliano,” Prometheus 6: 67–79.Google Scholar

Capitani, U. (1991) “I Sesti e la medicina,” in Mudry, P. and Pigeaud, J., eds., Les écoles médicales à Rome, Geneva: 95–123.Google Scholar

Cardauns, B. (2001) Marcus Terentius Varro: Einführung in sein Werk, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Carder, J. N. (1978) Art Historical Problems of a Roman Land Surveying Manuscript: The Codex Arcerianus A, Wolfenbüttel, New York.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2003) Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History, Oxford.Google Scholar

Carra de Vaux, B. (1903) “Le livre des appareils pneumatiques et des machines hydrauliques, par Philon de Byzance, édité d’après les versions arabes d’Oxford et de Constantinople.” Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque nationale et autres bibliothèques 38: 27–235.Google Scholar

Carretero Gálvez, J. M. (1997) “La filosofía en Columela,” in Maestre Maestre et al. 1997: 129–35.Google Scholar

Carroll, P. D. (1976) “Columella the Reformer,” Latomus 35: 783–90.Google Scholar

Castiglioni, A. (1940) “Aulus Cornelius Celsus as a Historian of Medicine,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 8: 857–73.Google Scholar

Castillo Pascual, M.-J. (1996a) “El nacimiento de una nueva familia de textos técnicos: La literatura gromática,” Gerión 14: 233–49.Google Scholar

Castillo Pascual, P. (1996b) Espacio en orden: El modelo gromático-romano de ordenación del territorio, Logroño.Google Scholar

Castillo Pascual, P. (2013) “Los honores de Sextius Iulius Frontinus y su literatura técnica: Una propuesta cronológica para su obra gromática,” DHA 39: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castillo Pascual, P. (2016) “Echt oder unecht? Frontin als gromatischer Autor aus historischer Sicht,” eTopoi Journal for Ancient Studies 5: 46–62.Google Scholar

Castro Gasalla, M. P. (1993) “Aforismos, dichos, citas y sentencias en la obra de Columela,” EClás 35: 65–80.Google Scholar

Catalano, P. (1960) Contributi allo studio del diritto augurale, Torino.Google Scholar

Catalano, P. (1978) “Aspetti spaziali del sistema giuridico-religioso romano: Mundus, templum, urbs, ager, Latium, Italia,” ANRW II.16.1: 440–553.Google Scholar

Cataudella, M. R. (2002) “Agronomia,” in Mastrorosa et al. 2002: 31–62.Google Scholar

Cavazza, F. (1981) Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico: La lingua latina come modello di struttura linguistica, Florence.Google Scholar

Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus On Rhetoric Books 1 and 2, New York.Google Scholar

Chaniotis, A. (2013) “Greeks under Siege: Challenges, Experiences, and Emotions,” in Campbell, B. and Tritle, L. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Warfare in the Classical World, Oxford: 438–56.Google Scholar

Chiasson, C. (2001) “Scythian Androgyny and Environmental Determinism in Herodotus and the Hippocratic περὶ ἀέρων ὑδάτων τόπων,” SyllClass 12: 33–73.Google Scholar

Chiritoiu, D. A. (2018) Commanding Texts: Knowledge-ordering, Identity Construction and Ethics in ‘Military Manuals’ of the Roman Empire, unpublished PhD dissertation, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Chiron, P. (2007) “The Rhetoric to Alexander,” in Worthington 2007: 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chlup, J. T. (2014) “Just War in Onasander’s ΣΤΡΑΤΗΓΙΚΟΣ,” JAH 2: 37–63.Google Scholar

Choisy, A. (1909) Vitruve, 4 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Chouquer, G., ed. (1996–7) Les formes du paysage, 3 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Chouquer, G. (2004) “Une nouvelle interprétation du corpus des gromatici veteres,” Agri centuriati: An International Journal of Landscape Archaeology 1: 43–56.Google Scholar

Chouquer, G. (2008) “Les transformations récentes de la centuriation: Une autre lecture de l’arpentage romain,” Annales (HSS) 63: 847–74.Google Scholar

Chouquer, G., Clavel-Lévêque, M., Favory, F., and Vallat, J.-P.. (1987) Structures agraires en Italie centro-méridionale: Cadastres et paysages ruraux, Rome.Google Scholar

Chouquer, G. and Favory, F. (1992) Les arpenteurs romains: Théorie et pratique, Paris.Google Scholar

Chouquer, G. and Favory, F. (1993) “De arte mensoria, ‘Du métier d’arpenteur’: Arpentage et arpenteurs au service de Rome,” Histoire & Mesure 8: 249–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chouquer, G. and Favory, F. (2001) L’arpentage romain: Histoire des textes, droit, techniques, Paris.Google Scholar

Christmann, C. (1982) “Zur antiken Georgica-Rezeption,” WJA 8: 57–67.Google Scholar

Christmann, C. (2003) “Zum Verhältnis von Autor und Leser in der römischen Agrarliteratur: Bücher und Schriften für Herren und Sklaven,” in Horster and Reitz 2003: 121–52.Google Scholar

Cichorius, C. (1922) Römische Studien: Historisches, Epigraphisches, Literargeschichtliches aus vier Jahrhunderten Roms, Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cid López, R. M., and Fernández, E. Garcia, eds. (2013) Debita verba: Estudios en homenaje al profesor Julio Mangas Manjarrés, 2 vols., Oviedo.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. (1982) “Iuvare mortalem: L’ideale programmatico della Naturalis historia di Plinio nei rapporti con il moralismo stoico-diatribico,” A&R 27: 124–48.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. (1991) Plinio il Vecchio e la tradizione del moralismo romano, Pisa.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. (2011) La scienza della natura per un intellettuale romano: Studi su Plinio il Vecchio, Pisa.Google Scholar

Citroni Marchetti, S. (2017) “Contingat aliqua gratia operae curaeque nostra: An Ethic of Care in the Naturalis historia,” in Bessone, F. and Fucecchi, M., eds., The Literary Genres in the Flavian Age: Canons, Transformations, Reception, Berlin: 65–82.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1994) “On the Training of the agrimensores in Republican Rome and Related Problems: Some Preliminary Observations,” ICC 19: 161–70.Google Scholar

Clavel-Lévêque, M., ed. (1983) Cadastres et espace rural: Approches et réalités antiques, Paris.Google Scholar

Clavel-Lévêque, M. and Favory, F.. (1992) “Les gromatici veteres et les réalités paysagères: Présentation de quelques cas,” in Behrends and Capogrosso Colognesi 1992: 88–137.Google Scholar

Clavel-Lévêque, M., Conso, D., Gonzalès, A., Guillaumin, J.-Y., and Robin, P.. (1996) Hygin l’arpenteur: L’établissement des limites, Naples.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1967) Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology, Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar

Connor, H. M. (1921) A Study of the Syntax of the Strategemata of Frontinus, unpublished PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Conso, D. (2005) “Comment définir et délimiter le vocabulaire technique des arpenteurs latins?” in Conso et al. 2005: 11–23.Google Scholar

Conso, D., Gonzalès, A., and Guillaumin, J.-Y., eds. (2005) Les vocabulaires techniques des arpenteurs romains, Besançon.Google Scholar

Contino, S. (1988) Auli Cornelii Celsi De medicina liber VIII, Bologna.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (2009) Res gestae divi Augusti, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2002) “Rhetorical Education in Cicero’s Youth,” in May, J. M., ed., Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, 23–48.Google Scholar

Corso, A. (1997) “Vitruvius and Attic Monuments” ABSA 92: 373–400.Google Scholar

Corso, A. (2016) Drawings in Greek and Roman Architecture, Oxford.Google Scholar

Cossarini, A. (1976–7) “Unità e coerenza del De re rustica di Varrone,” RAIB 55: 177–97.Google Scholar

Cossarini, A. (1977) “Aspetti di Virgilio in Columella,” Prometheus 3: 225–40.Google Scholar

Cossarini, A. (1980) “Columella interprete del suo tempo: Alcune considerazioni,” Giornale filologico ferrarese 3: 97–108.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. and Thomas, J., eds. (2001) Imaginaire et modes de construction du savoir antique dans les textes scientifiques et techniques, Perpignan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courrént, M. (1999a) “À propos d’une polysémie problématique: Étude sémantique et lexicologique de natura dans le De architectura de Vitruve,” LEC 67: 3–20.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (1999b) “Équilibre et changement dans le De architectura de Vitruve: Mécanique et chimie du monde appliquées à l’architecture,” Latomus 58: 534–63.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (2001) “La construction du savoir par la confrontation interdisciplinaire: L’imaginaire vitruvien,” in Courrént and Thomas 2001: 123–43.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (2004) “L’au-delà de la ratio dans le De architectura de Vitruve: Le discours de la méthode,” in Naas, V., ed., En deçà et au-delà de la ratio, Villeneuve-d’Ascq.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (2005) “Demonstrare atque explicare: La fonction de l’écrit dans le De architectura de Vitruve,” Pallas 69: 299–306.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (2011) De architecti scientia: Idée de nature et théorie de l’art dans le De architectura de Vitruve, Caen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courrént, M. (2016) “Vitruve et les naturales quaestiones: La théorie de la matière dans le De architectura,” Arethusa 49: 251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courrént, M. (2019) VITRVVIVS AVCTOR: L’œuvre littéraire de Vitruve et sa réception dans la littérature antique (I^er–V^e siècles), Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. W. (2009) “Virgil’s Cucumber Again: Columella 10.378–92,” CQ 59: 286–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2000) “Divide and Rule: Frontinus and Roman Land-Surveying,” SHPS 31: 189–202.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2001) Ancient Mathematics, London.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2007) Technology and Culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2011) “Skills and Virtues in Vitruvius’ Book 10,” in Formisano, M. and Böhme, H., eds., War in Words: Transformations of War from Antiquity to Clausewitz, Berlin, 309–32.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2016a) “A Case-Study in Roman Mathematics: The Description of the Analemma in Vitruvius’ De architectura, Book IX,” in Imhausen, A and Pommerening, T, eds., Translating Writings of Early Scholars in the Ancient Near East, Egypt, Greece and Rome: Methodological Aspects with Examples, Berlin, 439–64.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2016b) “Tacit Knowledge in Vitruvius.” Arethusa 49: 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cusmano, G. (2005) Sesto Giulio Frontino: Il IV libro degli Strategemata, Penta.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, H. (1964) Varro und die hellenistische Sprachtheorie, 2nd ed., Berlin.Google Scholar

Dain, A. (1930) Les manuscrits d’Onésandros, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dain, A. (1946) Histoire du texte d’Élien le tacticien des origines à la fin du Moyen Âge, Paris.Google Scholar

Dalby, A. (1998) Cato: On Farming. De agri cultura, Totnes.Google Scholar

Darab, A. (2012) “Lector in epistula – studiorum otiosis (Plin. Nat. hist. praef. 6),” Antik tanulmányok 56: 287–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daube, D. (1974) “The Mediocrity of Celsus,” CJ 70: 41–2.Google ScholarPubMed

De Melo, W. D. C. (2019) Varro: De lingua latina, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

De Nardis, M. (1994) The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Technical and Legal Aspects, unpublished PhD dissertation, London.Google Scholar

De Rijk, L. M. (1965) “Ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία: A Study of Its Original Meaning.” Vivarium 3: 24–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Saint-Denis, E. (1969) Columelle: De l’agriculture. Livre X (De l’horticulture), Paris.Google Scholar

De Saint-Denis, E. (1971) “Columelle, miroir de Virgile,” in Bardon, H. and Verdière, R., eds., Vergiliana: Recherches sur Virgile, Leiden: 328–43.Google Scholar

De Simone, C. (1968–70) Die griechischen Entlehnungen im Etruskischen, 2 vols., Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

De Vaan, M. (2008) Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages, Leiden.Google Scholar

Debru, A. (2001) “In respiritu (Nat. deor. II, 136): L’expression de la respiration en latin,” in Debru, A., Palmieri, N., and Jacquinod, B., eds., Docente natura: Mélanges de médecine ancienne et médiévale offerts à Guy Sabbah, Saint-Étienne, 43–67.Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K. (1965) Die griechische Empirikerschule: Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre, reprint of the 1930 ed., with additions, Berlin.Google Scholar

Deinlein, B. (1975) Das römische Sachbuch, unpublished PhD dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.Google Scholar

Del Chicca, F. (2002) “Personalità e interessi culturali di Frontino,” in Isola, A., Menestò, E., and Di Pilla, A., eds., Curiositas: Studi di cultura classica e medievale in onore di Ubaldo Pizzani, Naples: 205–17.Google Scholar

Del Chicca, F. (2004) Frontino: De aquae ductu urbis Romae, Rome.Google Scholar

DeLaine, J. (1996) “De aquis suis?: The commentarius of Frontinus,” with discussion, in Nicolet 1996: 117–45.Google Scholar

Della Corte, F. (1982) “Tecnica espositiva e struttura della Naturalis historia,” in Alfonsi and Ronconi 1982: 19–39.Google Scholar

Della Corte, M. (1922) “Groma,” Monumenti Antichi pubblicati per cura della R. Accademia dei Lincei 28.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2005) Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennis, G. (2014) The Taktika of Leo VI, rev. ed., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Deuse, W. (1993) “Celsus im prooemium von De medicina: Römische Aneignung griechischer Wissenschaft,” ANRW II.37.1: 819–41.Google Scholar

Devine, A. M. (1989) “Aelian’s Manual of Hellenistic Military Tactics: A New Translation from the Greek with an Introduction,” AncW 19: 31–64.Google Scholar

Devine, A. M. (1993) “Arrians’ Tactica.” ANRW II.34.1: 312–37.Google Scholar

Di Benedetto, V. (1958) “Dionisio il Trace e la Techne a lui attribuita,” ASNP 27: 169–210.Google Scholar

Di Lorenzo, E. (1986) “Il catalogo degli autori greci in Columella,” in Gallo, I., ed., Miscellanea filologica, Salerno: 161–75.Google Scholar

Diederich, S. (2007) Römische Agrarhandbücher zwischen Fachwissenschaft, Literatur und Ideologie, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diederich, S. (2013) “Humor, Witz und Ironie in Varros Dialog De re rustica,” in Föllinger, S. and Müller, G. M., Der Dialog in der Antike: Formen und Funktionen einer literarischen Gattung zwischen Philosophie, Wissensvermittlung und dramatischer Inszenierung, Berlin: 275–94.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1967) “Illustrations from Roman Surveyors’ Manuals,” Imago Mundi 21: 9–30.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1971) The Roman Land Surveyors: An Introduction to the Agrimensores, Newton Abbot.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1974) “Archaeological and Epigraphic Evidence of Roman Land Surveys,” ANRW II.1: 564–92.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1976) “Varro and the Origins of Centuriation,” in Atti del congresso internazionale di studi varroniani, Rieti: II 353–8.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1983) “De Frontini et Flaviorum communibus curis,” in Atti del congresso internazionale di studi flaviani, Rieti, 125–32.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1987) “Maps in the Service of the State: Roman Cartography to the End of the Augustan Era,” in Harley, J. B. and Woodward, D., eds., Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean, Chicago, IL: 201–11.Google Scholar

Dilke, O. A. W. (1988) “Religious Mystique in the Training of Agrimensores,” in Porte and Néraudau 1988: 158–62.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (2017) “Xenophon: The Small Works,” in Flower, M. A., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon, Cambridge, 195–219.Google Scholar

Dion, R. (1959) Histoire de la vigne et du vin en France, des origines au XIX^e siècle, Paris.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1959) Gorgias: A Revised Text, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domínguez Petit, R. (2004) “Fuentes literarias para la agricultura cartaginesa: El tratado de Magón,” Habis 35: 179–92.Google Scholar

Doody, A. (2001) “Finding Facts in Pliny’s Encyclopaedia: The summarium of the Natural History,” Ramus 30: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doody, A. (2007) “Virgil the Farmer? Critiques of the Georgics in Columella and Pliny,” CPh 102: 180–97.Google Scholar

Doody, A. (2009) “Pliny’s Natural History: The enkuklios paideia and the Ancient Encyclopaedia,” JHI 70: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doody, A. (2010) Pliny’s Encyclopedia: The Reception of the Natural History, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doody, A. (2011) “The Science and Aesthetics of Names in the Natural History,” in Gibson and Morello 2011: 113–29.Google Scholar

Doody, A. (2017) “The Authority of Writing in Varro’s De re rustica,” in König and Woolf 2017: 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1966) M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Drachmann, A. G. (1948) Ktesibios, Philon and Heron: A Study in Ancient Pneumatics, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Dueck, D. (2000) Strabo of Amasia: A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome, New York.Google Scholar

Dumont, J.-C. (1993) Columelle: De l’agriculture. Livre III, Paris.Google Scholar

Dumont, J. C. (2008) “Columella and Vergil,” Vergilius 54: 49–58.Google Scholar

Dumont, J.-P. (1986) “L’idée de Dieu chez Pline (HN 2, 1–5, 1–27),” Helmantica 37: 219–37.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P. (1982) The Economy of the Roman Empire: Quantitative Studies, 2nd ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2012) Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speeches on Behalf of Marcus Fonteius and Marcus Aemilius, Oxford.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. (1961) The Political Thought of Sallust, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2002) “An Emperor is Made: Senatorial Politics and Trajan’s Adoption by Nerva in 97,” in Clark, G. and Rajak, T., eds., Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin, Oxford: 211–26.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2013) “Die Gestalt Frontins in ihrer politischen und sozialen Umwelt,” in Letzner 2013: 111–34.Google Scholar

Eck, W. and Pangerl, A. (2003) “Sex. Iulius Frontinus als Legat des niedergermanischen Heeres: Zu neuen Militärdiplomen in den germanischen Provinzen,” ZPE 143: 205–19.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. (1931) “The Hippocratic Physician,” in Temkin and Temkin 1967: 87–110.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. (1932) “The History of Anatomy in Antiquity,” in Temkin and Temkin 1967: 247–301.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. (1972–99) Posidonius, 4 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (1995) Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Englund, J. (1935) Kassusyntaxen hos A. Cornelius Celsus, Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Eramo, I. (2021) “Precetti per gestire l’imperium: Nota a Onasandro, Strategikos, proemio 1,” DHA 47: 239–50.Google Scholar

Ercolani, L. (1997) “La lingua di Onasandro: Ricerche sugli ἅπαξ λεγόμενα,” AFLS 18: 43–53.Google Scholar

Espinosa Espinosa, D. (2013) “La Historia natural de Plinio el Viejo: Un proyecto ‘augusteo’ de época flavia,” in Cid López and Garcia Fernández 2013: I 671–84.Google Scholar

Evans, H. B. (1994) Water Distribution in Ancient Rome: The Evidence of Frontinus, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, R. (2005) “Geography without People: Mapping in Pliny Historia naturalis Books 3–6,” Ramus 34: 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, J. and Berggren, J. L. (2006) Geminos’ Introduction to the Phenomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Survey of Astronomy, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Fagan, G. G. (2006) “Bathing for Health with Celsus and Pliny the Elder,” CQ 56: 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Favro, D. (1996) The Urban Image of Augustan Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fear, A. T. (2011) “The Roman’s Burden,” in Gibson and Morello 2011: 21–34.Google Scholar

Fensterbusch, C. (1976) Vitruvii De architectura libri decem: Zehn Bücher über Architektur, 2nd ed., Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Ferri, S. (1951) “Binomi obbligati nella critica d’arte degli antichi,” SCO 11: 206–14.Google Scholar

Ferri, S. (1960) Vitruvio: Architettura (Dai Libri I–VII), Rome.Google Scholar

Festa, N. (1932–5) I frammenti degli stoici antichi, 2 vols., Bari.Google Scholar

Finkmann, S., Behrendt, A., and Walter, A., eds. (2018) Antike Erzähl- und Deutungsmuster: Zwischen Exemplarität und Transformation, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flach, D. (1990) Römische Agrargeschichte, Munich.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (1996–2002) Marcus Terentius Varro: Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft, 3 vols., Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Flemming, R. (2000) Medicine and the Making of Roman Women: Gender, Nature, and Authority from Celsus to Galen, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleury, P. (1991) “Les roses des vents latines,” Euphrosyne 19: 61–88.Google Scholar

Fleury, P. (1994) “Le De architectura et les traités de mécanique ancienne,” in Le projet de Vitruve (q. v.): 187–212.Google Scholar

Fleury, P. (2003) Vitruve: De l’architecture. Livre I. 2nd ed., Paris.Google Scholar

Fleury, P. (2017) De rebus bellicis: Sur les affaires militaires, Paris.Google Scholar

Fögen, T., ed. (2005) Antike Fachtexte / Ancient Technical Texts, Berlin.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2009) Wissen, Kommunikation und Selbstdarstellung: Zur Struktur und Charakteristik römischer Fachtexte der frühen Kaiserzeit, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fögen, T. (2014) “Die Traktate römischer Agrimensoren im Kontext antiker Fachliteratur: Form, Funktion, Autorbewußtsein,” in Knobloch and Möller 2014: 215–38.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2018) “L’architecte engagé: Education, Morality and Politics in Vitruvius’ De architectura,” GLO 39–40: 17–46.Google Scholar

Folkerts, M. (1992) “Mathematische Probleme im Corpus agrimensorum,” in Behrends and Capogrossi Colognesi 1992: 311–34.Google Scholar

Folkerts, M. (2014) “Die Mathematik der Agrimensoren – Quellen und Nachwirkung,” in Knobloch and Möller 2014: 131–48.Google Scholar

Fontán, A. (1997) “Escritores hispanos en el siglo de Columela,” in Maestre Maestre et al. 1997: 15–34.Google Scholar

Forcellini, E. (1771) Totius Latinitatis Lexicon consilio et cura Jacobi Facciolati, opera et studio Aegidii Forcellini, alumni seminarii Patavini, lucubratum, 4 vols, Padua.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. 2001. Tecnica e scrittura: Le letterature tecnico-scientifiche nello spazio letterario tardolatino, Rome.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2006) Review of R. H. Rodgers, Frontinus: De aquaeductu urbis Romae (2004), CR 56: 132–5.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2011) “The Strategikós of Onasander: Taking Military Texts Seriously.” Technai 2: 39–52.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2017) “Fragile Expertise and the Authority of the Past: The ‘Roman Art of War,’” in König and Woolf 2017: 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Formisano, M. (2018) “Beyond the Fence: Columella’s Garden,” in Finkmann et al. 2018: 501–14.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. and van der Eijk, P., eds. (2017) Knowledge, Text and Practice in Ancient Technical Writing, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2007) “Aristotle’s Art of Rhetoric,” in Worthington 2007: 107–23.Google Scholar

Franklin, L. (2005) “Technē and Teleology in Plato’s Gorgias,” Apeiron 38: 229–55.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1980) “The Original Notion of Cause,” in Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M., and Barnes, J., eds., Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, Oxford: 217–49.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1982) “The Method of the So-Called Methodical School of Medicine,” in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M., and Schofield, M., eds., Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice, Cambridge: 1–23.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1987) “The Ancient Empiricists,” in Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis, MN: 243–60.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1988) “The Empiricist Attitude Towards Reason and Theory.” Apeiron 21: 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, M. (1990) “An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism,” in Stephen, E., ed., Epistemology, Cambridge: 225–50.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1996) “Aristotle’s Rationalism,” in Frede, M. and Striker, G., eds., Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford: 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, R. K. (1994) Ancient Natural History: Histories of Nature, London.Google Scholar

French, R. K. and Greenaway, F., eds. (1986) Science in the Early Roman Empire: Pliny the Elder, His Sources and Influence, London.Google Scholar

Frézouls, E. (1985) “Vitruve et le dessin d’architecture,” Le dessin d’architecture dans les sociétés antiques, Leiden: 213–29.Google Scholar

Frézouls, E. (1989) “Fondements scientifiques, armature conceptuelle et praxis dans le De architectura,” in Geertman and de Jong 1989: 39–48.Google Scholar

Frézouls, E. (1994) “Grammaire et rhétorique chez Vitruve,” in Dangel, J., ed., Grammaire et rhétorique: Notion de romanité, Strasbourg: 151–69.Google Scholar

Fronda, M. P. (2011) “Hannibal: Tactics, Strategy, and Geostrategy,” in Hoyos, D., ed., A Companion to the Punic Wars, Malden, MA: 242–59.Google Scholar

Fruyt, M. (2014) “Territoire, terrain, terre dans le vocabulaire des agronomes latines,” in Brunet, C., ed., Territoires et dépendances: Approches linguistiques, Besançon, 17–50.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Das systematische Lehrbuch: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wissenschaften in der Antike, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1980) “La praefatio de Vitruvio e la Roma Augustea,” ACD 16: 49–52.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1985) “Per un’interpretazione storica della centuriazione romana,” Athenaeum 63: 265–84.Google Scholar

Gaide, F. (2006) “À propos du vocabulaire des arpenteurs latins: Étymologies antiques et modernes; Analyses lexicologiques,” in Conso et al. 2006: 33–9.Google Scholar

Gaines, R. N. (2007) “Roman Rhetorical Handbooks,” in Dominik, W. and Hall, J., eds., A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, Malden, MA: 163–80.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius, and the Didactic Tradition, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2013) “Piety, Labour, and Justice in Lucretus and Hesiod,” in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D., and Sharrock, A., eds., Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, Oxford: 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galimberti, A. (2002) “Lo Strategikòs di Onasandro,” in Sordi, M., ed., Guerra e diritto nel mondo greco e romano, Milan: 141–53.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Gallia, A. B. (2012) Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Galzerano, M. (2015) “Lucrezio, De rerum natura 2, 1173–1174: In difesa di ire ad capulum,” Paideia 70: 243–53.Google Scholar

Galzerano, M. (2018) “Four Notes on Lucretius and a Note on Manilius,” Maia 70: 280–90.Google Scholar

Garani, M. (2007) Empedocles redivivus: Poetry and Analogy in Lucretius, London.Google Scholar

García Armendáriz, J. I. (2004) Columela: Libro de los árboles. La labranza: Libros I–V, Madrid.Google Scholar

Gargola, D. J. (1995) Lands, Laws and Gods: Magistrates and Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Lands in Republican Rome, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Gargola, D. J. (2004) “The Ritual of Centuriation,” in Konrad, C. F., ed., Augusto augurio: Rerum humanarum et divinarum commentationes in honorem Jerzy Linderski, Stuttgart: 124–49.Google Scholar

Gargola, D. J. (2005) “Hyginus Gromaticus and Frontinus on the Installation of limites: Ritual, Law, and Legitimacy,” Caesarodunum 39: 125–52.Google Scholar

Gargola, D. J. (2017) The Shape of the Roman Order: The Republic and Its Spaces. Chapel Hill, NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garlan, Y. (1974) Recherches de poliorcétique grecque, Paris.Google Scholar

Garrido-Hory, M. and Gonzalès, A., eds. (2003) Histoire, espaces et marges de l’Antiquité: Hommages à Monique Clavel-Lévêque, 4 vols., Besançon.Google Scholar

Gärtner, U. (2002) “Zum Lob Italiens in der griechischen Literatur,” Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz. Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 2002 IV, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gauly, M. G. (2018) “Plinius’ Zoologie und die römische Naturgeschichte,” in Müller, G. M. and Mariani-Zini, F., eds., Philosophie in Rom – römische Philosophie? Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven, Berlin: 469–87.Google Scholar

Gautherie, A. (2017) Rhétorique et thérapeutique dans le De medicina de Celse, Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geertman, H. (1994) “Teoria e attualità della progettistica architettonica di Vitruvio,” in Le projet de Vitruve (q. v.): 7–30.Google Scholar

Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J., eds. (1989) Munus non ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture, Leiden.Google Scholar

Gemoll, A. (1876) “Über das Fragment De munitionibus castrorum.” Hermes 11: 164–78.Google Scholar

Geus, K. (2014) “Agennius Urbicus und die Antichthonen: Ein stoisches Weltbild im Corpus agrimensorum Romanorum,” in Knobloch and Möller 2014: 113–30.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. Y. and Morello, R., eds. (2011) Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gilliver, C. M. (1996) “The Roman Army and Morality in War,” in Lloyd, A. B., ed., Battle in Antiquity, London: 219–38.Google Scholar

Gilliver, C. M. (1999) The Roman Art of War, Charleston, SC.Google Scholar

Gindhart, M. (2017) “Crossing Genres in römischen Fachtexten: Zu den Lehrdichtungen in den Agrarhandbüchern von Columella und Palladius,” in Dresen, A. and Freitag, F., eds., Crossing: Über Inszenierungen kultureller Differenzen und Identitäten, Bielefeld: 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goesius, W. (Willem van der Goes) (1674) Rei agrariae auctores legesque variae, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Goguey, D. (1978) “La formation de l’architecte: Culture et technique,” in André, J.-M., ed., Recherches sur les artes à Rome, Paris: 100–15.Google Scholar

Goldmann, B. (1988) Einheitlichkeit und Eigenständigkeit der Historia Romana des Appian, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, A. (2000) The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265–146 BC, London.Google Scholar

Gordon, A. E. (1952) Quintus Veranius Consul A.D. 49: A Study Based upon His Recently Identified Sepulchral Inscription, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2011) “Les définitions de l’epistêmê et de la technê dans l’ancien stoïcisme,” in Jouanna et al. 2011: 243–56.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2000) “Vegetable Love: Virgil, Columella, and Garden Poetry.” Ramus 29: 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gozzoli, S. (2010) “Vitruvio e la basilica di Fano,” SCO 56: 111–30.Google Scholar

Granger, F. (1931–4) Vitruvius: On Architecture, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Green, C. M. C. (1997) “Free as a Bird: Varro De re rustica 3,” AJPh 118: 427–48.Google Scholar

Greene, J. A. and Kehoe, D. P. (1995) “Mago the Carthaginian,” in Fantar, M. H. and Ghaki, M., eds., Actes du III^e congrès international des études phéniciennes et puniques, Tunis: 110–17.Google Scholar

Gregorić, P. and Grgić, F. (2006) “Aristotle’s Notion of Experience,” AGPh 88: 1–30.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1972) “The Elder Seneca and Spain.” JRS 62: 1–19.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1976) Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (2000) “The Flavians,” in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D., eds., The Cambridge Ancient History, Vol. IX, The High Empire, A. D. 70–192, 2nd ed., Cambridge: 1–83.Google Scholar

Grillone, A. (2012) Gromatica militare: Lo ps. Igino, Brussels.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1986) “Pline et les philosophes,” Helmantica 37: 239–49.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1975) “Structures et limites de la compilation vitruvienne dans les livres III et IV du De architectura,” Latomus 34: 986–1009.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1982) “Vitruve: L’architecture et sa théorie, à la lumière des études récentes,” ANRW II.36.1: 659–95.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1989) “L’auctoritas chez Vitruve: Contribution à l’étude de la sémantique des ordres dans le De architectura,” in Geertman and de Jong 1989: 126–33.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1992) Vitruve: De l’architecture. Livre IV, Paris.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1994) “Munus non ingratum: Le traité vitruvien et la notion de service,” in Le projet de Vitruve (q. v.): 75–90.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1996) “Les illustrations du De architectura de Vitruve: Histoire d’un malentendu,” with discussion, in Nicolet 1996: 19–44.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1997) “Vitruvio e il suo tempo,” in Gros et al. 1997: ix–lxxvii.Google Scholar

Gros, P., Corso, C. and Romano, E. (1997) Vitruvio: De architectura, 2 vols., Torino.Google Scholar

Grosse, R. (1934) Review of D. Schenk, Flavius Vegetius Renatus: Die Quellen der Epitoma rei militaris (1930), Deutsche Literaturzeitung 55: 61–5.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome, London.Google Scholar

Gugel, H. (1970) “Bemerkungen zur Darstellung von Catilinas Ende bei Sallust (Ein Beitrag zur antiken Feldherrntopik),” in Ableitinger, D. and Gugel, H., eds., Festschrift Karl Vretska zum 70. Geburtstag überreicht von seinem Freunden und Schülern, Heidelberg: 361–81.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (1994) “Géométrie grecque et agrimensorique romaine: La science comme justification d’une idéologie,” DHA 20: 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (1995) “Les agrimensores romains et la géométrie grecque.” In Jacquinod, B., ed., Actes du XXVIII^ème congrès international, Saint-Étienne: 39–64.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (1996) Balbus: Présentation systématique de toutes les figures. Podismus et textes connexes. Extraits d’Épaphrodite et de Vitruvius Rufus. La mesure des jugères, Naples.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (1997) “Les noms latins du point géométrique,” in Colace, P. R., ed., Atti del II seminario internazionale di studi sui lessici tecnici greci e latini, Naples: 85–106.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2002) “L’éloge de la geometria chez Agennius Urbicus,” REA 104: 433–43.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2003) “Géométrie et arpentage: Le ‘geometres’ à l’époque néronienne d’après Sénèque, ad Luc. 88, §10–13,” in Garrido-Hory and Gonzalès 2003: I 109–32.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2004) “L’origine du terme occupatorius d’après Hygin,” in Clavel-Lévêque, M. and Hermon, E., eds., Espaces intégrés et ressources naturelles dans l’empire romain, Besançon: 39–47.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2005) Les arpenteurs romains. Tome I: Hygin le gromatique. Frontin, Paris.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2009a) “La classification des figures géométriques dans le traité gromatique d’Hygin,” Euphrosyne 37: 177–91.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2009b) “Quels rapports entre les agrimensores romains et la science grecque?” in Le Blay, F., ed., Transmettre les savoirs dans les mondes hellénistique et romain, Rennes: 119–32.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2009c) “Regard sur le passé et identité romaine chez les auteurs du corpus gromatique latin,” Pallas 31: 133–9.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2010) “Le livre gromatique du Haut-Empire,” in Perrin, Y. and de Souza, M., eds., Neronia VIII: Bibliothèques, livres et culture écrite dans l’empire romain de César à Hadrien, Brussels: 156–64.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2015a) “Le discours des agrimensores latins: Caractéristiques et sources, transmission et adaptation,” SPhV 17: 9–34.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, J.-Y. (2015b) “Quelques incertitudes et problèmes concernant la groma,” in Fleury, P., Jacquemard, C., and Madeleine, S., eds., La technologie gréco-romaine: Transmission, restitution, et médiation, Caen: 177–89.Google Scholar

Guittard, C. (2009) “La délimitation du templum augural: Les formules d’auguratio de Varron (L., VII, 8) et de Tite-Live (I, 18, 6–10),” in Devillers, O. and Meyers, J., eds., Pouvoirs des hommes, pouvoirs des mots, des Gracques à Trajan, Louvain: 77–89.Google Scholar

Gummerus, H. (1906) Der römische Gutsbetrieb als wirtschaftlicher Organismus nach den Werken des Cato, Varro und Columella, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gummerus, H. (1909–10) De Columella philosopho, Helsinki.Google Scholar

Gundermann, G. (1888a) Iuli Frontini Strategematon libri quattuor, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gundermann, G. (1888b) Quaestiones de Iuli Frontini Strategamaton libris, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hadot, I. (2005) Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique: Contribution à l’histoire de l’éducation et de la culture dans l’antiquité, 2nd ed., Paris.Google Scholar

Hahn, J. (1991) “Plinius und die griechischen Ärtze in Rom: Naturkonzeption und Medizinkritik in der Naturalis historia,” Sudhoffs Archiv 75: 209–39.Google Scholar

Hamberg, P. G. (1965) “Vitruvius, Fra Giocondo and the City Plan of Naples: A Commentary on Some Principles of Ancient Urbanism and their Rediscovery in the Renaissance,” AArch 36: 105–25.Google Scholar

Hänger, C. (2001) Die Welt im Kopf: Raumbilder und Strategie im römischen Kaiserreich, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Hankinson, J. (1987 a) “Causes and Empiricism: A Problem in the Interpretation of Later Greek Medical Method,” Phronesis 32: 329–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hankinson, J. (1987b) “Evidence, Externality and Antecedence: Inquiries into Later Greek Causal Concepts,” Phronesis 32: 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, J. (1998) Galen: On Antecedent Causes, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hankinson, J. (2003) “Causation in Galen,” in Barnes, J., ed., Galien et la philosophie, Geneva: 31–66.Google Scholar

Hankinson, J. (2004) “Art and Experience: Greek Philosophy and the Status of Medicine,” Quaestio 4: 3–24Google Scholar

Harig, G. (1971) “Zum Problem ‘Krankenhaus’ in der Antike,” Klio 53: 179–95.Google Scholar

Harig, G. (1976) “Die Diätetik der römischen Enzyklopädisten,” NTM 13: 1–15.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1980) “Towards a Study of the Roman Slave Trade,” MAAR 36: 117–40.Google Scholar

Harris-McCoy, D. (2017) “Making and Defending Claims to Authority in Vitruvius’ De architectura,” in König and Woolf 2017: 107–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haselberger, L. (1989) “Die Zeichnungen in Vitruvs De architectura: Zur Illustration antiker Schriften über das Konstruktionswesen,” in Geertman and de Jong 1989: 69–70.Google Scholar

Haselberger, L. (1999) “Geometrie der Winde, windige Geometrie: Städtebau nach Vitruv und Aristophanes,” in Schwandner, E.-L. and Rheidt, K., eds., Stadt und Umland: Neue Ergebnisse der archäologischen Bau- und Siedlungsforschung, Mainz: 90–100.Google Scholar

Haselberger, L. (2007) Urbem adornare: Rome’s Urban Metamorphosis under Augustus (transl. A. Thein), Portsmouth, RI.Google Scholar

Hasper, P. S. and Yurdin, J. (2014) “Between Perception and Scientific Knowledge: Aristotle’s Account of Experience,” OSAPh 47: 119–50.Google Scholar

Haß, C. D. (2018) “‘Geerdetes Denken’ (Teil 1): (Agri)Kultur als Formverfahren und Episteme bei Varro, De re rustica,” in Erdbeer, R. M., Kläger, F., and Stierstorfer, K., eds., Literarische Form: Theorien, Dynamiken, Kulturen. Beiträge zur literarischen Modellforschung, Heidelberg: 305–46.Google Scholar

Hawkins, C. (2016) Roman Artisans and the Urban Economy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Healy, J. F. (1999) Pliny the Elder on Science and Technology, Oxford.Google Scholar

Heath, T. (1921) A History of Greek Mathematics, 2 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar

Heinimann, F. (1961) “Eine vorplatonische Theorie der τέχνη,” MH 18: 105–30.Google Scholar

Heisterhagen, R. (1952) Die literarische Form der Rerum rusticarum libri Varros, unpublished PhD dissertation, Marburg.Google Scholar

Heitland, W. E. (1921) Agricola: A Study of Agriculture and Rustic Life in the Greco-Roman World from the Point of View of Labour, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2002) “Columella’s Living Hedge: The Roman Gardening Book,” JRS 92: 110–33.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2004) The Roman Book of Gardening, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hentz, G. (1978) Columelle: De re rustica. Livre I, 3 vols., thesis, Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Hentz, G. (1979) “Les sources grecques dans les écrits des agronomes latins,” Ktèma 4: 151–60.Google Scholar

Hermon, E. (2003) “Les gromatici entre fictions et faits,” in Garrido-Hory and Gonzalès 2003: I 133–60.Google Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1950) “L’effort de style de Varron dans les Res rusticae,” RPh 24: 57–78.Google Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1976) “L’agronome carthaginois Magon et ses traducteurs en latin et en grec,” CRAI 120: 441–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1978–97) Varron: Économie rurale, 3 vols., Paris.Google Scholar

Highet, G. (1975) “The Mediocrity of Celsus,” CJ 70: 57.Google Scholar

Hinrichs, F. T. (1974) Die Geschichte der gromatischen Institutionen: Untersuchungen zu Landverteilung, Landvermessung, Bodenverwaltung und Bodenrecht im römischen Reich, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Hinrichs, F. T. (1992) “Die ‘agri per extremitatem mensura comprehensi’: Diskussion eines Frontintextes und der Geschichte seines Verständnisses,” in Behrends and Capogrossi Colognesi 1992: 348–72.Google Scholar

Hofter, M. (1988) Kaiser Augustus und die verlorene Republik, Mainz.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. (2017) “Pure Life: The Limits of the Vegetal Analogy in the Hippocratics and Galen,” in Wee, J. Z., ed., Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine, Leiden: 358–86.Google Scholar

Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D., eds. (2015) The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horster, M. and Reitz, C., eds. (2003) Antike Fachschriftsteller: Literarischer Diskurs und sozialer Kontext, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Howe, N. P. (1985) “In Defense of the Encyclopedic Mode: On Pliny’s ‘Preface’ to the Natural History,” Latomus 44: 561–76.Google Scholar

Hübner, W. (1992) “Himmel und Erdvermessung,” in Behrends and Capogrossi Colognesi 1992: 140–70.Google Scholar

Hug, A. (1877) Aeneas von Stymphalos: Ein arkadischer Schriftsteller aus classischer Zeit, Zurich.Google Scholar

Humm, M. (2014) “Espaces comitiaux et contraintes augurales à Rome pendant la période républicaine,” Ktèma 39: 315–45.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. (2019) “Dialectic as a Subpart of Stoic Philosophy,” in Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K., eds., Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge: 114–33.Google Scholar

Ilberg, J. (1907) A. Cornelius Celsus und die Medizin in Rom, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Illinois Greek Club. (1923) Aeneas Tacticus. Asclepiodotus. Onasander, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Ireland, R. I. (1990) Iuli Frontini Strategemata, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. (1979) Plato: Gorgias, Oxford.Google Scholar

Isager, J. (1991) Pliny on Art and Society: The Elder Pliny’s Chapters on the History of Art, London.Google Scholar

Jackson, B. D. (1975) Augustine: De dialectica, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. (2008) Archimedes and the Roman Imagination, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jahn, O. (1850) “Über römische Encyclopädien,” Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Classe 4: 263–87.Google Scholar

Janson, T. (1964) Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1985) “The New Chapters of the Ninth Book of Celsus’ Artes,” in Cairns, F., ed., Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, Vol. 5, Liverpool: 299–336.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. (2017) “Aristotle on the Logos of the Craftsman,” Phronesis 62: 97–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, T. K. ed. (2021) Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, I. (2006) Galen: On Diseases and Symptoms, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. A. (1999) “Huc pater O Lenaee veni: The Cultivation of Wine in Vergil’s Georgics,” Journal of Wine Research 10: 207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, H. (1860) M. Catonis praeter librum de re rustica quae extant, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Jori, A. (1996) Medicina e medici nell’antica Grecia: Saggio sul Perì téchnes Ippocratico, Naples.Google Scholar

Josephson, A. (1950) Casae litterarum: Studien zum corpus agrimensorum Romanorum, Uppsala.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (1999) Hippocrates (transl. M. B. DeBevoise), Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J., Fartzoff, M., and Bakhouche, B., eds. (2011) L’homme et la science, Paris.Google Scholar

Kaibel, G. (1885) “Antike Windrosen,” Hermes 20: 579–624.Google Scholar

Kappelmacher, A. (1918) Untersuchungen zur Enzyklopädie des A. Cornelius Celsus, Vienna.Google Scholar

Kassel, R. (1971) Der Text der aristotelischen Rhetorik: Prolegomena zu einer kritischen Ausgabe, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keeline, T. J. (2018) The Reception of Cicero in the Early Roman Empire: The Rhetorical Schoolroom and the Creation of a Cultural Legend, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1963) The Art of Persuasion in Greece, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1994) A New History of Classical Rhetoric, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (2007) Aristotle: On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse, 2nd ed., Oxford.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. F. (2016) “Airs, Waters, Metals, Earth: People and Environment in Archaic and Classical Greek Thought,” In Kennedy, R. F. and Jones-Lewis, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Identity and the Envrionment in the Classical and Medieval Worlds, London: 9–28.Google Scholar

Keppie, L. J. F. (1983) Colonisation and Veteran Settlement in Italy, 47–14 B.C, London.Google Scholar

Kern, P. B. (1999) Ancient Siege Warfare. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar

Keßler, L. and Ott, K.. (2017) “Nec provident future tempori, sed quasi plane in diem vivant—Sustainable Business in Columella’s De re rustica?” in Schliephake, C., ed., Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity, Lanham, MD: 197–216.Google Scholar

Keyser, P. T. and Irby-Massie, G., eds. (2008) Encyclopedia of Ancient Natural Scientists: The Greek Tradition and Its Many Heirs, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keyser, P. T. and Scarborough, J., eds. (2018) The Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kidd, I. G. (1978) “Philosophy and Science in Posidonius,” A&A 24: 7–15.Google Scholar

Kienast, H. J. (2014) Der Turm der Winde in Athen, with contributions by Karanastasi, P. and Schaldach, K., Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Kier, H. (1933) De laudibus vitae rusticae, unpublished PhD dissertation, Marburg.Google Scholar

Knell, H. (1985) Vitruvs Architekturtheorie: Versuch einer Interpretation, Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Knobloch, E. (2014) “Wissenschaftshistorische Aspekte im Thulin’schen Corpus agrimensorum Romanorum,” in Knobloch and Möller 2014: 83–112.Google Scholar

Knobloch, E. (2015) “Les écrits des arpenteurs romains et l’influence de la cosmologie,” in Caye, P., Nanni, R., and Napolitani, P. D., eds., Scienze e rappresentazioni: Saggi in onore di Pierre Souffrin, Florence, 49–68.Google Scholar

Knobloch, E. (2018) “Wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Erläuterungen,” in Lindermann et al. 2018: 64–84.Google Scholar

Knobloch, E. and Möller, C., eds. (2014) In den Gefilden der römischen Feldmesser: Juristische, wissenschaftsgeschichtliche, historische und sprachliche Aspekte, Berlin.Google Scholar

Kolendo, J. (1973) Le traité d’agronomie des Saserna (transl. J. Kasińska), Warsaw.Google Scholar

König, A. (2007) “Knowledge and Power in Frontinus’ On aqueducts,” in König and Whitmarsh 2007: 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

König, A. (2009) “From Architect to Imperator: Vitruvius and his Addressee in the De architectura,” in Taub and Doody 2009, 31–52.Google Scholar

König, A. (2013) “Frontinus’ Cameo Role in Tacitus’ Agricola,” CQ 63: 361–76.Google Scholar

König, A. (2016) “Tracing the Ebb and Flow of De architectura 8,” Arethusa 49: 161–81.Google Scholar

König, A. (2017) “Conflicting Models of Authority and Expertise in Frontinus’ Strategemata,” in König and Woolf 2017: 153–81.Google Scholar

König, A. (2018) “Reading Civil War in Frontinus’s Strategemata: A Case-Study for Flavian Literary Studies,” in Ginsberg, L. D. and Krasne, D. A., eds., After 69 CE – Writing Civil War in Flavian Rome, Berlin: 144–77.Google Scholar

König, A. (2020) “Tactical Interactions: Dialogues between Greece and Rome in the Military Manuals of Aelian and Arrian,” in König, A., Langlands, R., and Uden, J., eds., Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions, Cambridge: 134–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

König, J. (2017) “Introduction: Self-Assertion and Its Alternatives in Ancient Scientific and Technical Writing,” in König and Woolf 2017: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

König, J. and Whitmarsh, T., eds. (2007) Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

König, J. and Woolf, G., eds. (2013a.) Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

König, J. and Woolf, G. (2013b) “Introduction,” in König and Woolf 2013a: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

König, J. and Woolf, G. (2013c) “Encyclopaedism in the Roman Empire,” in König and Woolf 2013a: 23–63.Google Scholar

König, J. and Woolf, G. eds. (2017) Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korzenszky, E. and Vári, R. (1935) Onasandri Strategicus, Budapest.Google Scholar

Köves-Zulauf, T. (1973) “Die Vorrede der plinianischen Naturgeschichte,” WS new series 7: 134–84.Google Scholar

Krafft, F. 1973. “Kunst und Natur: Die Heronische Frage und die Technik in der klassischen Antike.” A&A 19.1: 1–19.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (2007) “Caesar’s Account of the Battle of Massilia (BC 1.34–2.22): Some Historiographical and Narratological Approaches,” in Marincola, J., ed., Greek and Roman Historiography, Malden, MA: II 371–8.Google Scholar

Krenkel, W. (1959) “Zu den Artes des Celsus,” Philologus 103: 114–29.Google Scholar

Krenkel, W. (1973) “A. Cornelius Celsus,” in Argentea aetas in memoriam Entii V. Marmorale, Genoa: 17–28.Google Scholar

Krings, V. (2008) “Rereading Punic Agriculture: Representation, Analogy and Ideology in the Classical Sources,” in van Dommelen, P. and Bellard, C. Gómez, eds., Rural Landscapes of the Punic World, London: 22–43.Google Scholar

Krings, V. and Devillers, O. (1996) “Autour de l’agronome Magon,” in Khanoussi, M., Ruggeri, P., and Vismara, C., eds., L’Africa romana, Ozieri: I 489–516.Google Scholar

Krohn, F. (1912) Vitruuii De architectura libri decem, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Kronenberg, L. (2009) Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kube, J. (1969) Τέχνη und ἀρετή: Sophistisches und platonisches Tugendwissen, Berlin.Google Scholar

Kuchma, V. V. (1984) “Some Disputed Questions Concerning the Strategemata of Frontinus,” Vestnik drevnej istorii (Journal of Ancient History) 171: 45–55.Google Scholar

Kühnert, F. (1961) Allgemeinbildung und Fachbildung in der Antike, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kullmann, W., Althoff, J., and Asper, M., eds. (1998) Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, Tübingen.Google Scholar

LaBarge, S. (2006) “Aristotle on Empeiria,” AncPhil 26: 23–44.Google Scholar

Lachmann, K., Blume, F., and Rudorff, A. (1848–52) Die Schriften der römischen Feldmesser, 2 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar

Lagopoulos, A. P. (2009) “The Semiotics of the Vitruvian City,” Semiotica 175: 193–251.Google Scholar

Lallot, J. (2003) La grammaire de Denys le Thrace, 2nd ed., Paris.Google Scholar

Lammert, F. (1939) Review of G. Bendz, Die Echtheitsfrage des vierten Buches der frontinischen Strategemata (1938), Philologische Wochenschrift 59: 234–9.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2008) “‘Reading for the Moral’ in Valerius Maximus: The Case of severitas,” CCJ 54: 160–87.Google Scholar