Ackrill, J. L. 1972. ‘Aristotle’s Definitions of Psuche’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119–33.Google Scholar

Ackrill, J. L. 1981. Aristotle the Philosopher. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2023. ‘Natural, Artificial, and Organic Forms in Avicenna’, in Charles, D. (ed.), The History of Hylomorphism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Angier, T. 2010. Techne in Aristotle’s Ethics: Crafting the Moral Life. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1976. ‘Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Books M and N’, The Philosophical Review 87(3): 479–85.Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1982. ‘Aristotle on Inefficient Causes’, Philosophical Quarterly 32(129): 311–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2007. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life: An Essay in Practical Realism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balme, D. M. 1992. Aristotle: De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with Passages from II.1–13). Translated with notes, with a report on recent work and additional bibliography by A. Gotthelf. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Baltussen, A., Atkinson, M., Share, M. and Mueller, I. 2012. Simplicius: On Aristotle’s Physics 1.5–9. Annotated translation. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (ed.). 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Bollingen Series LXXI.2. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Barney, R. 2021. ‘Technê as a Model for Virtue in Plato’, in Johansen, T. K. (ed.), Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 62–85. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, K. 1965. ‘Der Begriff der Techne bei Aristoteles’, in Flashar, H. and Gaiser, K. (eds.), Synusia, pp. 275–87. Pfülligen: Neske.Google Scholar

Beckman, A. 1889. Num Plato Artefactorum Ideas Statuerit. Bonn: Bonnae, P. Hanstein.Google Scholar

Beere, J. 2006. ‘Potentiality and the Matter of Composite Substance’, Phronesis 51(4): 303–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berryman, S. 2002. ‘Aristotle on Pneuma and Animal Self-Motion’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bluck, R. S. 1975. Plato’s Sophist: A Commentary. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1991. ‘Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics I’ in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, pp. 1–29. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2018. ‘Two Conceptions of Practical Skill (Τέχνη) in Aristotle’, in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (ed.), Aristotle: Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought – On the 2400th Anniversary of Aristotle’s Birth, pp. 279–96. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2021. ‘Technê and Empeiria: Aristotle on Practical Knowledge’, in Johansen, T. K. (ed.), Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 131–65. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bonitz, H. 1849. Commentarius in Aristotelis Metaphysicam. Bonn.Google Scholar

Bostock, D. 1994. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books Z and H. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 1987. ‘Nature, Craft and Phronesis in Aristotle’, Philosophical Topics 15(2): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadie, S. 1990. ‘Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology’, in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, pp. 389–403. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2004. ‘De generatione et corruptione I 4: Distinguishing Alteration’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the XV Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 123–50. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2007. ‘Why No Platonistic Ideas of Artefacts?’, in Scott, D. (ed.),Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, pp. 232–53. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2009. ‘Aporia 8’, in Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta: Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 135–50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Buddensiek, F. 2018. ‘Aporia in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V. (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 137–54. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 1984. Notes on Books Eta and Theta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2004. ‘Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics’, in Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle’s on Generation and Corruption I Book 1: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Butler, T. 2003. ‘Empeiria in Aristotle’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 41(3): 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, C. 2012. ‘Compositional & Functional Matter: Aristotle on the Material Cause of Biological Organisms’, Apeiron 48(4): 387–406.Google Scholar

Byrne, C. 2019. Aristotle’s Science of Matter and Motion. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G. 1971. Platone e le tecniche. Einaudi.Google Scholar

Cambiano, G. 2012. ‘The Desire to Know Metaphysics A 1’, in Steel, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 1–43. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, M. 2019. ‘The Moving Cause of Artefacts: The Role of Techne in Metaphysical Explanation’, DIALOGOI: Ancient Philosophy Today 1(1): 64–83.Google Scholar

Cardullo, R. L. 2005. ‘L’analogia techne/physis e il finalismo universale in Fisica II’, in Cardullo, R. L. and Giardina, G. R. (eds.), La Fisica di Aristotele oggi: Problemi e prospettive, pp. 51–109. Catania: CUECM.Google Scholar

Cardullo, R. L. 2012. Asclepio di Tralle: Commentario al libro Alpha meizon (A) della Metafisica di Aristotele. Acireale: Bonanno editore.Google Scholar

Castelli, L. M. 2010. Problems and Paradigms of Unity: Aristotle’s Accounts of the One. International Aristotle Studies 6. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

Castelli, L. M. 2018. Aristotle: Metaphysics Book Iota. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caston, V. 2006. ‘Aristotle’s Psychology’, in Gill, M.-L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.),The Blackwell Companion to Ancient Philosophy, pp. 316–46. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2008. ‘Aristotle’s Psychological Theory’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 24(1): 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charles, D. 2010a. ‘Definition and Explanation in the Posterior Analytics (and Beyond)’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, pp. 286–318. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charles, D. 2010b. ‘Metaphysics Θ.7 and 8: Some Issues concerning Actuality and Lotentiality’, in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf, pp. 168–97. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2021. The Undivided Self: Aristotle and the ‘Mind-Body Problem’. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlton, W. 1970. Aristotle: Physics Books I and II. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and Academy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Code, A. 1976. ‘The Persistence of Aristotelian Matter’, Philosophical Studies 29(6): 357–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Code, A. 1987. ‘Soul as an Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology’, Philosophical Topics 15(2): 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Code, A. 1997. ‘Aristotle’s Metaphysics as a Science of Principles’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51(201): 357–78.Google Scholar

Code, A. 2003. ‘Changes, Powers and Potentialities in Aristotle’, in Reshotko, N. (ed.),Desire, Identity, and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner, pp. 253–71. Kelowna: Academic Printing and Publishing.Google Scholar

Code, A. 2011. ‘Aristotle on the Matter of Corpses in Metaph. H 5’, Invited Lecture, Munich School of Ancient Philosophy, 14 December. www.philosophy.rutgers.edu/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Matter-of-Corpses-Draft.pdfGoogle Scholar

Cohen, S. M. 1996. Aristotle on Nature and Incomplete Substance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connell, S. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coope, U. 2021. ‘Aristotle on Productive Understanding and Completeness’, in Johansen, T. K. (ed.), Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê, pp. 109–30. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. 1982. ‘Aristotle on Natural Teleology’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos, pp. 197–22. Cambridge University Press; reprinted in Cooper, J. M. 2004. Knowledge, Nature and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, pp. 107–29.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. 1987. ‘Hypothetical Necessity and Natural Teleology’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 243–74. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. 2009. ‘Two Notes on Aristotle on Mixtures’, in Cooper, J. M., Knowledge, Nature and the Good. Essays on Ancient Philosophy, pp. 148–73. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corkum, P. 2023. ‘Aristotle on Artifactual Substances’, Metaphysics 6(1): 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. Translation and commentary on the Theaetetus and the Sophist. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1939. Plato and Parmenides: Introduction, translation and commentary on Parmenides’ poem and the Parmenides of Plato. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P. 2006a. ‘The Status of the Arts: Proclus’ Theory of Artefacts’, Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 2(2): 305–44.Google Scholar

D’Hoine, P. 2006b. ‘Proclus and Syrianus on Ideas of Artefacts: A Test Case for Neoplatonic Hermeneutics’, in Perkams, M. and Piccione, R. M. (eds.), Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, pp. 279–302. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Haas, F. A. 2016. ‘Mixture in Philoponus: An Encounter with a Third Kind of Potentiality’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators, pp. 413–36. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

De Ribera-Martin, I. 2017. ‘Unity and Continuity in Aristotle’, Apeiron 50(2): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dipert, R. R. 1993. Artifacts, Art Works and Agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Elder, C. L. 2004. Real Natures and Familiar Objects. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elder, C. L. 2007. ‘On the Place of Artefacts in Ontology’, in Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation, pp. 33–51. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emilsson, E. 2021. ‘Plotinus on the Arts’, in Johansen, T. K. (ed.), Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê, pp. 245–62. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evnine, S. 2016. Making Objects and Events: A Hylomorphic Theory of Artefacts, Actions, and Organisms. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falcon, A. 2019. ‘Aristotle on Causality’, in Zalta, E. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-causality/.Google Scholar

Fernandez, P. A. and Mittelmann, J. 2017. ‘ἡ κίνησις τῆς τέχνης: Crafts and Souls as Principles of Change’, Phronesis 62(2): 136–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferro, A. 2021. Aristotle on Self Motion. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar

Fine, G. 1993. On Ideas. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fine, K. 1995. ‘The Problem of Mixture’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 266–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, K. 1998. ‘Mixing Matters’, Ratio 11(3): 278–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forcignanò, F. 2014. ‘Il problema delle idee di artefatto in Platone’, Méthexis 27: 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forcignanò, F. 2016. Forme, linguaggio, sostanze. Il dibattito sulle idee nell’Academia antica. Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.Google Scholar

Frank, D. H. 1984. The Arguments ‘From the Sciences’ in Aristotle’s ‘Peri ideon’. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Frank, J. 2005. A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Work of Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Franks, C. 2009. He Became Poor: The Poverty of Christ and Aquinas’s Economic Teachings. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Franssen, M. 2009. ‘Philosophy of Technology’, in Zalta, E. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/technology/.Google Scholar

Frede, D. 2004. ‘GC I 10: On Mixture and Mixables’, in Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle’s on Generation and Corruption I Book 1: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1987. ‘The Unity of General and Special Metaphysics: Aristotle’s Conception of Metaphysics’, in Frede, M. (ed.), Essays in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 81–95. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1994. ‘Aristotle’s Notion of Potentiality in Metaphysics’, in Scaltsas, T., Charles, D. and Gill, M.-L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, pp. 173–93. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1996. ‘Aristotle’s Rationalism’, in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought, pp. 157–73. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, M. and Patzig, G. 1988. Aristoteles, ‘Metaphysik Z’ Text, Übersetzung Und Kommentar, Band 1 and 2. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Freeland, C. 1987. ‘Aristotle on Bodies, Matter, and Potentiality’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 392–407. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, C. 2016. ‘Organic Unity and the Matter of Man’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 167–204.Google Scholar

Furley, D. 1978. ‘Self-Movers’, in Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses, pp. 165–79. Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Furley, D. 1994. ‘Self-Movers’, in Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion From Aristotle to Newton, pp. 3–14. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Furth, M. 1985. Metaphysics: Books VII-X, Zeta, Eta, Theta, Iota. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Furth, M. 1988. Substance, Form and Psyche: An Aristotelean Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galluzzo, G. 2006. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Book Zeta: The Contemporary Debate. Pisa: Edizioni della Scuola Normale.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. 2011. ‘Artifacts, Substances and Essences’, Apeiron 18: 50–58.Google Scholar

Gill, M.-L. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Golitsis, P. 2016. ‘Who Were the Real Authors of the Metaphysics Commentary Ascribed to Alexander and Ps.-Alexander?’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted: New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators, pp. 565–88. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, A. 2012. ‘Understanding Aristotle’s Teleology’, in Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 67–89. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregorić, P. and Grgić, F. 2006. ‘Aristotle’s Notion of Experience’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halper, E. 2005. One and Many in Aristotle’s Metaphysics: The Central Books. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 2020. ‘Aristotle and the Mechanics of Desire: De Motu Animalium 7 (from 701b2)–8’, in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s De motu animalium: Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 387–415. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasper, P. S. and Yurdin, J. 2014. ‘Between Perception and Scientific Knowledge: Aristotle’s Account of Experience’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47: 119–50.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. 1892. Xenocrates: Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente. Hildesheim: Gg. Olms.Google Scholar

Henning, B. 2009. ‘The Four Causes’, Journal of Philosophy 106: 137–60.Google Scholar

Henry, D. 2005. ‘Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy’, Phronesis 50(1): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, D. 2019. Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes: The Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilpinen, R. 1992. ‘Artifacts and Works of Art’, Theoria 58: 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilpinen, R. 1993. ‘Authors and Artifacts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilpinen, R. 2011. ‘Artifact’, in Zalta, E. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artifact/.Google Scholar

Houkes, W. and Vermaas, P. E. 2009. ‘Artefacts in Analytic Metaphysics: Introduction’, Techné 13(2): 74–81.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1962. ‘A proposito di un’interpretazione cinquecentesca del rapporto teoria-prassi in Aristotele e Platone’, La parola del passato 17: 436–47.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1964. ‘Platone e la prima academia di fronte al problema degli artefatti’, Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 19: 123–58.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1966. Techne: Momenti del pensiero greco da Platone a Epicuro. Firenze: Nuova Italia.Google Scholar

Jackson, H. 1982a. ‘Plato’s Later Theory of Ideas I’, Journal of Philosophy 10: 253–98.Google Scholar

Jackson, H. 1982b. ‘Plato’s Later Theory of Ideas II’, Journal of Philosophy 11: 287–331.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. W. 1912. ‘Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Metaphysik des Aristoteles’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 32: 415–18.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. W. 1923. ‘Aristoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 43(130): 201.Google Scholar

Joachim, H. H. 1922. Aristotle: On Coming-to-be and Passing-away. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2010. ‘Should Aristotle Have Recognized Final Causes in Plato’s Timaeus?’, in Mohr, R. and Sattler, B. (eds.), One Book, the Whole Universe: Plato’s Timaeus Today, pp. 179–200. Las Vegas: Parmenidies.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Souls. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2016. ‘Natural and Artificial Bodies in Plato and Aristotle’, in Buchheim, T. and Meissner, D. (eds.), Body in Ancient Philosophy and Literature, pp. 455–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2017. ‘Aristotle on the Logos of the Craftsman’, Phronesis 62(2): 97–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, T. K. 2021. ‘Crafting the Cosmos: Plato on the Limitations of Divine Craftsmanship’, in Johansen, T. K. (ed.), Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê, pp. 86–108. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, B. J. 1974. ‘Aristotle’s Introduction of Matter’, The Philosophical Review 83: 474–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judson, L. 2000. ‘Formlessness and the Priority of Form: Metaphysics Zeta 7–9 and Lambda 3’, in Charles, D. and Frede, M. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V. (eds.). 2018. The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Katayama, E. G. 1999. Aristotle on Artifacts: A Metaphysical Puzzle. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Katayama, E. G. 2008. ‘Substantial Unity and Living Things in Aristotle’, Apeiron 41(3): 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsey, S. 2003. ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Nature’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kidd, S. 2019. ‘What Do Pleasure-Objects Do? An Inquiry into Toys’, in Kidd, S. (ed.), Play and Aesthetics in Ancient Greece, pp. 97–121. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, R. A. H. 2001. Aristotle on Life and Death. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Kirwan, C. 1993. Metaphysics: Books Gamma, Delta, and Epsilon. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. 2007. ‘How to Refer to Artifacts’, in Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation, pp. 138–49. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Koslicki, K. 1997. ‘Four-Eighths Hephaistos: Artifacts and Living Things in Aristotle’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 14(1): 77–98.Google Scholar

Koslicki, K. 2008. The Structure of Objects. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koslicki, K. 2018. Form, Matter, Substance. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kosman, A. 1987. ‘Animals and Other Beings in Aristotle’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, pp. 360–91. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kosman, A. 2013. The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krizan, M. 2018. ‘Mixing and the Formation of Homoeomers in On Generation and Corruption 2.7’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54: 187–226.Google Scholar

Kroes, P. 2012. Technical Artefacts: Creations of Mind and Matter – A Philosophy of Engineering Design. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroes, P. and Meijers, A. 2006. ‘The Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts’, Studies in History Philosophy of Science 37(1): 1–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krohs, U. 2009. ‘Structure and Coherence of Two-Model-Descriptions of Technical Artefacts’, Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13: 150–61.Google Scholar

Krohs, U. and Kroes, P. 2009. Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaBarge, S. 2006. ‘Aristotle on Empeiria’, Ancient Philosophy 26(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leigh, R. 2015. On Theriac to Piso, Attributed to Galen. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 1982. ‘Teleology, Chance, and Aristotle’s Theory of Spontaneous Generation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 20(3): 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. G. 2004. Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals I-IV. Translation with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Leszl, W. 1975. Il De Ideis di Aristotele e la teoria platonica delle idee. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewens, T. 2004. Organisms and Artifacts Design in Nature and Elsewhere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, F. A. 1994. ‘Aristotle on the Relation between a Thing and Its Matter’, in Scaltsas, T. Charles, D. and Gill, M.-L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, pp. 247–78. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, F. A. 2013. How Aristotle Gets By in Metaphysics Zeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livingston, P. 2011. ‘History of the Ontology of Art’, in Zalta, E. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/art-ontology-history/.Google Scholar

Loux, M. J. 1991. Primary Ousia: An Essay on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z and H. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Löbl, R. 1997. Τέχνη-Techne Untersuchung zur Bedeutung dieses Wortes in der Zeit von Homer Bis Aristoteles, vol. 1, Von Homer bis zu den Sophisten. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Löbl, R. 2003. Τέχνη-Techne: Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung dieses Wortes in der Zeit von Homer bis Aristoteles, vol. 2, Von den Sophisten bis Aristoteles. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Löbl, R. 2008. Τέχνη-Techne: Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung dieses Wortes in der Zeit nach Aristoteles, vol. 3, Die Zeit des Hellenismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Madigan, A. 1999. Aristotle: Metaphysics Books B and K 1-2. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Majcherek, K. 2022. ‘The Medieval Problem of the Productivity of Art’, Philosophies 7(5): article 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makin, S. 2006. Aristotle: Metaphysics Theta. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Malcolm, J. 1967. ‘Plato’s Analysis of τὸ ὄν and τὸ μὴ ὄν in the Sophist’, Phronesis 12: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.). 2007. Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marmodoro, A. 2013. ‘Aristotle’s Hylomorphism without Reconditioning’, Philosophical Inquiry 36(1–2): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKirahan, R. D. 1978. ‘Aristotle’s Subordinate Sciences’, British Journal for the History of Science 11(3): 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meikle, S. 1997. Aristotle’s Economic Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Meißner, B. 1999. Die technologische Fachliteratur der Antike. Struktur, Uberlieferung und Wirkung technischen Wissens in der Antike (ca. 400 v. Chr.– ca. 500 n. Chr.). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Merlan, P. 1957. ‘Metaphysik: Name und Gegenstand’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 77(1): 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merricks, T. 2001. Objects and Persons. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menn, S. (n.d.). The Aim and the Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, www.philosophie.hu-berlin.de/de/lehrbereiche/antike/mitarbeiter/menn/contents.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2002. ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, S. S. 1992. ‘Aristotle, Teleology, and Reduction’, The Philosophical Review 101(4): 791–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mignucci, M. 1988. ‘Platone e Relativi’, Elenchos 9: 259–94.Google Scholar

Mirus, C. V. 2006. ‘The Homogeneous Bodies in Meteorology iv 12’, Ancient Philosophy 26(1): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Modrak, D. 1987. Aristotle: The Power of Perception. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Morel, P. M. 2015. Aristote, Métaphysique – Livre Èta. Translation with commentary. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Morel, P. M. 2017. ‘Substance et artefact. Sur Aristote, Mét. H’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 35(2): 169–96.Google Scholar

Morison, B. 2002. On Location: Aristotle’s Concept of Place. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morison, B. 2004. ‘Self Motion in Physics VIII’, in Laks, A. and Rashed, M. (eds.), Aristote et le mouvement des animaux, pp. 67–79. Presses universitaires du Septentrio.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moss, J. 2014. ‘Right Reason in Plato and Aristotle: On the Meaning of Logos’, Phronesis 59(3): 181–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, I. 1970. ‘Aristotle on Geometrical Objects’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52: 156–71. Reprinted in Barnes, J., Schofield, M. and Sorabji, R. (eds.). 1979. Articles on Aristotle, vol. 3. London: Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, J. 2018. Practical and Productive Thinking in Aristotle, Phronesis 63(2): 148–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Natorp, P. 1888. ‘Über Aristoteles’ Metaphysik, K 1-8, 1065a26’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1(2): 178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, D. A. 2001. The Design of Everyday Things. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1960. ‘Logic and Metaphysics in Some Earlier Works of Aristotle’, in Düring, I. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century (Studia graeca et latina gothoburgensia, XI, pp. 163–90. Gothenburg: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1971. ‘Plato on Not-Being’, in Vlastos, G., Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. 1, Metaphysics and Epistemology, pp. 223–67. New York: Doubleday and Anchor.Google Scholar

Owens, J. 1951. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics: A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar

Papandreou, M. 2018. ‘Aristotle’s Hylomorphism and the Contemporary Metaphysics of Artefacts’, Discipline Filosofiche 28(1): 113–36.Google Scholar

Papandreou, M. 2020. ‘The Shape of the Statue: The Greek Commentators on Aristotle’s Metaphysics on Forms of Artefacts’, History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 23(2): 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papandreou, M. 2021. ‘Aristotle’s Take on Inadvertently Made Objects’, Esercizi Filosofici 16: 26–41.Google Scholar

Perl, E. D. 1999. ‘The Presence of the Paradigm: Immanence and Transcendence in Plato’s Theory of Forms’, Review of Metaphysics 53(2): 339–62.Google Scholar

Petroski, H. 1992. The Evolution of Useful Things: How Everyday Artifacts – From Forks and Pins to Paper Clips and Zippers – Came to Be as They Are. New York: Knopf Doubleday.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, C. 2018a. Aristotle’s Theory of Bodies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeiffer, C. 2018b. ‘Aristotle and the Thesis of Mereological Potentialism’, Philosophical Inquiry 42: 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Politis, V. 2003. ‘Aristotle on Aporia and Searching in Metaphysics’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 145–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Politis, V. 2004. ‘Aristotle and the Metaphysics’, Mind 114(455): 760–64.Google Scholar

Preston, B. 2012. A Philosophy of Material Culture: Action, Function, and Mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Preus, A. 1975. Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Biological Works. Hildesheim: Olms Verlag.Google Scholar

Quarantotto, D. 2005. Causa Finale, Sostanza, Essenza in Aristotele. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Rackham, H. 1932. Aristotle: Politics. Loeb Classical Library 264. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rapp, C. 2016. ‘The Principles of Sensible Substance in Metaphysics Λ 2-5’, in Horn, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda – New Essays, pp. 87–118. Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rapp, C. 2020. Introduction Part I: The Argument of De Motu Animalium, in Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.). Aristotle’s De motu animalium: Symposium Aristotelicum, pp. 1–66. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rapp, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.). 2020. Aristotle’s De motu animalium: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rashed, M. 2012. ‘Il Timeo: negazione del principio di necessità condizionale, matematica e teodicea’, in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Il Platonismo e le Scienze, pp. 65–79. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar

Rea, M. C. 1995. ‘The Problem of Material Constitution’, The Philosophical Review 104: 525–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rea, M. C. 1998. ‘Sameness without Identity: An Aristotelian Solution to the Problem of Material Constitution’, Ratio 11: 316–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. 2000. Substantial Knowledge: Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. 2016. Aristotle: Metaphysics. Translation with commentary. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Reydon, T. 2012. ‘Philosophy of Technology’, in Feiser, J. and Dowden, B. (eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/technolo/.Google Scholar

Robin, L. 1908. La théorie platonicienne des idées et des nombres d’aprés Aristote. Ètude historique et critique. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics. Translation with commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Salmieri, G. 2010. ‘Αἴσθησις, Ἐμπειρία, and the Advent of Universals in Posterior Analytics II 19’, Apeiron 43(2–3): 155–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scaltsas, T. 2009. ‘Mixing the Elements’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle, pp. 242–59. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Scaltsas, T. 2015. ‘Substantial Holism’, Philosophical Inquiry 39(1): 146–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharle, M. 2015. ‘Man from Man but not Bed from Bed: Nature, Art and Chance in Phys. II’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 88–106. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schnurrenberger, D. and Bryan, A. L. 1985. ‘A Contribution to the Study of the Naturefact-Artifact Controversy’, in Plew, M. G., Woods, J. C., and Pavesic, M. G. (eds.), Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, pp. 133–59. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1991. ‘Is Aristotle’s Teleology Anthropocentric?’, Phronesis 36(2): 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. 2010. ‘Teleology, Aristotelian and Platonic’, in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf, pp. 5–29. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedley, D. 2013. ‘Plato and the One-over-Many Principle’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Galluzzo, G. (eds.), Universals in Ancient Philosophy, pp. 113–37. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1967. ‘Aristotle’s Metaphysics: An Introduction’, in Sellars, W., Philosophical Perspectives. History of Philosophy, pp. 73–124. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company .Google Scholar

Shields, C. 2005. ‘Review of Harte, V., Plato on Parts and Wholes (2002)’, The Philosophical Review 114: 273–77.Google Scholar

Shields, C. 2008. ‘Substance and Life in Aristotle’, Apeiron 41: 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simons, P. M. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Soavi, M. 2009. Antirealismo e artefatti. Sui limiti della natura. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar

Stavrianeas, S. 2015. ‘Νature as a Principle of Change’, in Leunissen, M. J. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, N. 2011. ‘Aristotle’s Causal Pluralism’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93(2): 121–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Todd, R. B. 2012. Themistius: On Aristotle Physics 1-3. Annotated translation. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Thomasson, A. L. 1999. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thomasson, A. L. 2003. ‘Realism and Human Kinds’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 580–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomasson, A. L. 2007a. Ordinary Objects. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomasson, A. L. 2007b. ‘Artifacts and Human Concepts’, in Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation, pp. 52–73. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tipton, J. 2014. Philosophical Biology in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuozzo, T. 2011. ‘How Dynamic Is Aristotle’s Efficient Cause?’, Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15(2): 447–64.Google Scholar

Unger, P. 1979. ‘There Are No Ordinary Things’, Synthese 41: 117–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vattimo, G. 1961. Il concetto di fare in Aristotele. Università di Torino.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. and Lanza, D. 1971. Aristotele. Opere biologiche. Translation with commentary. UTET: Torino.Google Scholar

Viano, C. 2015. ‘Mixis and Diagnôsis: Aristotle and the “Chemistry” of the Sublunary World’, Ambix 62(3): 203–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wardy, R. 2005. ‘The Mysterious Aristotelian Olive’, Science in Context 18(1): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waterlow, S. 1982. Nature, Change and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics: A Philosophical Study. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiting, J. 1992. ‘Living Bodies’, in Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, A. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s de Anima, pp. 75–91. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Wiggins, D. 2001. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, C. J. F. 1982. Aristotle’s De Generatione et Corruptione. Translated with notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilpert, P. 1949. Zwei aristotelische Frühschriften über die Ideenlehre. Regensburg: Habbel.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 2003. Ways of Being: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witt, C. 2015a. ‘In Defence of the Craft Analogy: Artifacts and Natural Teleology’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, pp. 107–20. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Witt, C. 2015b. ‘“As If by Convention Alone”: The Unstable Ontology of Aristotle’s Ethics’, in Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, pp. 276–92. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, R. and Weisberg, M. 2004. ‘Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems about Elemental Composition from Philoponus to Cooper’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35(4): 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zedda, S. 2000. ‘How to Build a World Soul: A Practical Guide’, in Wright, M. R. (ed.), Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus, pp. 23–41. London: Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar