Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption Book II Introduction, Translation, and Interpretative Essays
Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption Book IIIntroduction, Translation, and Interpretative Essays, pp. 281 - 288Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Anagnostopoulos, 2021 Anagnostopoulos, A., “Mixture, Generation and the First Aporia of Aristotle’s GC 1.10.” In Phronesis 66: 139–177.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, 2009 Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, 1976 Barnes, J., “Aristotle, Menaechmus, and Circular Proof.” In Classical Quarterly 26: 278–292.Google Scholar
Barnes, 1984 Barnes, J., The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Beere, 2006 Beere, J., “Potentiality and the Matter of Composite Substance.” In Phronesis 51: 303–329.Google Scholar
Beere, 2016 Beere, J., “Receptacle as a Material Base for Bodies in Plato’s Timaeus.” In Buchheim et al.: 201–226.Google Scholar
Bodnár, 1997 Bodnár, I., “Movers and Elemental Motion in Aristotle.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15: 81–117.Google Scholar
Bogen, 1996 Bogen, J., “Fire in the Belly: Aristotelian Elements, Organisms, and Chemical Compounds.” In Lewis-Bowen 1996: 183–216.Google Scholar
Bolton, 2009 Bolton, R., “Two Standards of Inquiry in Aristotle’s de Caelo.” In Bowen-Wildberg 2009: 51–82.Google Scholar
Bostock, 1995 Bostock, D., “Aristotle on the Transmutation of the Elements in De Generatione et Corruptione I 1–4.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 13: 217–229 (reprinted in Bostock 2006: 19–29).Google Scholar
Bostock, 2006 Bostock, D., Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowen-Wildberg, 2009 Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, Ch. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De caelo. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
Broadie, 1982 Waterlow, S. [Broadie]. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Broadie, 2004 Broadie, S., “GC I 4: Distinguishing Alteration.” In de Haas-Mansfeld 2004: 123–150.Google Scholar
Broadie, 2007 Broadie, S., “Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology.” In Broadie, S., Aristotle and Beyond: Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 85–100 (originally published in Devereux-Pellegrin 1990: 389–403).Google Scholar
Bruns, 1892 Alexander of Aphrodisias. Ἀπορίαι καὶ λύσεις. In Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Supplementary volume. 2.2, edited by Bruns, I.. Reimer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, 2004 Brunschwig, J., “On Generation and Corruption I 1: A False Start?” In de Haas-Mansfeld 2004: 25–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchheim, 2010 Buchheim, Th., Aristoteles, Über Werden und Vergehen. Übersetzt und erläutert von Th. Buchheim. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Buchheim, et al. 2016 Buchheim, Th., Meissner, D., and Wachsmann, N. (eds.), ΣΩΜΑ: Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur. Felix Meiner, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Burkert, 1959 Burkert, W., “STOICHEION: Eine semasiologische Studie.” In Philologus 103: 167–197.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, 2004 Burnyeat, M. F., “Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics.” In de Haas-Mansfeld 2004: 7–24.Google Scholar
Castelli, 2018 Castelli, L. M., Aristotle: Metaphysics Book Iota. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Charlton, 1970 Charlton, W., Aristotle: Physics Books I and II. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cherniss, 1935 Cherniss, H., Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Code, 2008 Code, A., “Aristotelian Colors as Causes.” In Føllesdal-Woods 2008: 235–242.Google Scholar
Cohen, 1996 Cohen, S. M., Aristotle on Nature and Incomplete Substance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cohen, 2012 Cohen, S. M., “Alteration and Persistence: Form and Matter in the Physics and De Generatione et Corruptione.” In Shields 2012: 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, (forthcoming) Connell, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Critical Guide to Aristotle’s Parts of Animals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cooper, 2009 Cooper, J. M., “Two Notes on Aristotle on Mixture.” In Cooper, J. M., Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Crowley, 2005 Crowley, T. J., “On the Use of Stoicheion in the Sense of ‘Element’.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2005: 367–389.Google Scholar
Crowley, 2008 Crowley, T. J., “Aristotle’s ‘So-called Elements’.” In Phronesis 53: 223–242.Google Scholar
Crowley, 2013 Crowley, T. J., “De generatione et corruptione 2.3: Does Aristotle Identify the Contraries as Elements?” In Classical Quarterly 63: 161–182.Google Scholar
Crowley, 2019 Crowley, T. J., “On the ‘Perceptible Bodies’ at GC II 1.” In Archai 27: 1–26.Google Scholar
Crubellier, 2000 Crubellier, M., “Metaphysics Lambda 4.” In Frede-Charles 2000: 137–160.Google Scholar
Dancy, 1978 Dancy, R. M., “On Some of Aristotle’s Second Thoughts about Substances: Matter.” In Philosophical Review 87: 373–413.Google Scholar
de Haas, 1999 de Haas, F., “An Encounter with a Third Kind of Potentiality.” In Thijssen-Braakhuis 1999: 21–46.Google Scholar
de Haas-Mansfeld, 2004 de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.) Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I. Symposium Aristotelicum. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Delcomminette, 2018 Delcomminette, S., Aristote et la nécessité. Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, Paris.Google Scholar
Denyer, 2000 Denyer, N., “Aristotle on Modality.” In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74: 143–161.Google Scholar
Devereux-Pellegrin, 1990 Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote. Éditions du CNRS, Paris 1990.Google Scholar
Dimas, et al. 2019 Dimas, P., Jones, R. E., Lear, G. R. (eds.), Plato’s Philebus: A Philosophical Discussion. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrey, 2015 Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ebrey, 2020 Ebrey, D., “Aristotle on the matter for Birth, Life, and the Elements.” In Taub 2020: 79–101.Google Scholar
Falcon, 2005 Falcon, A., Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Falcon, 2016 Falcon, A., “The Subject Matter of Aristotle’s Physics.” In Buchheim et al. 2016: 423–436.Google Scholar
Falcon-Leunissen, 2015 Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M., “The Scientifics Role of Eulogos in Aristotle’s Cael II 12.” In Ebrey 2015: 217–240.Google Scholar
Fine, 1995 Fine, K., “The Problem of Mixture.” In Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76: 266–369.Google Scholar
Føllesdal-Woods, 2008 Føllesdal, D. and Woods, J. (eds), Festschrift for Julius Moravcsik. College Publications, London.Google Scholar
Forster–Furley, 1955 Aristotle, On Sophistical Refutations, On Coming-to-Be and Passing-Away, On the Cosmos, edited and translated by Forster, E. S. and Furley, D. J.. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Frede, 2004 Frede, D., “On Generation and Corruption I 10: On Mixture and Mixables.” In de Haas-Mansfeld 2004: 289–314.Google Scholar
Frede-Charles, 2000 Frede, M. and Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda. Proceedings of the Symposium Aristotelicum. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Frey, 2007 Frey, Ch., “Organic Unity and the Matter of Man.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 167–204.Google Scholar
Frey, 2015 a Frey, Ch., “Two Conceptions of Soul in Aristotle.” In Ebrey 2015: 137–160.Google Scholar
Frey, 2015 b Frey, Ch., “Capacities and the Eternal in Metaphysics Θ.8 and De caelo.” In Phronesis 60: 88–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, (forthcoming) Frey, Ch., “Analogical Unity and Biological Kinds in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals.” In Connell (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Furth, 1988 Furth, M., Substance, Form, and Psyche: An Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gannagé, 2005 Gannagé, E., Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle’s On Coming-to-Be and Perishing 2.2–5. Bloomsbury, London.Google Scholar
Gill, 1989 Gill, M. L., Aristotle’s Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gill, 2019 Gill, M. L., “The Fourfold Division of Beings: Philebus 27 C–31B.” In Dimas et al. 2019: 71–89.Google Scholar
Gill-Lennox, 1994 Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Graham, 2010 Graham, D. (ed. and trans.), The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. Part I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harte, 2002 Harte, V., Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Henry, 2014 Henry, D., “The Birds and the Bees: Aristotle on the Biological Concept of ἀνάλογον.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 29: 145–169.Google Scholar
Henry, 2015 Henry, D., “Substantial Generation in Physics I 5–7.” In Leunissen 2015: 144–161.Google Scholar
Henry, 2019 Henry, D., Aristotle on Matter, Form, and Moving Causes: The Hylomorphic Theory of Substantial Generation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, et. al. 2019 Ierodiakonou, K., Kalligas, P., Karasmanis, V. (eds.), Aristotle’s Physics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, 1948 Jaeger, W. W., Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of his Development. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Joachim, 1922 Aristotle, On Coming-to-be and Passing-away, edited by Joachim, H. H. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Judson, 1994 Judson, L., “Heavenly Motion and the Unmoved Mover.” In Gill-Lennox 1994: 155–172.Google Scholar
Kahn, 1960 Kahn, Ch., Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kalfas, 2011 Kalfas, V., Aristotelis: Peri Geneseos kai Phthoras, Translation, Introduction, Notes by Kalfas, V.. Athens.Google Scholar
Karbowski, 2014 Karbowski, J., “Empirical Eulogos Argumentation in GA III 10.” In British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 25–38.Google Scholar
Karbowski, 2016 Karbowski, J., “Justification ‘by Argument’ in Aristotle’s Natural Science.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51: 119–160.Google Scholar
Kelsey, 2003 Kelsey, S., “Aristotle’s Definition of Nature.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 59–87.Google Scholar
King, 1956 King, H. R., “Aristotle without Prima Materia.” In Journal of the History of Ideas 17: 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizan, 2013 “Elemental Structure and the Transformation of the Elements On Generation and Corruption II 4.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 195–224.Google Scholar
Krizan, 2018 Krizan, M., “Mixing and Homoeomers in GC II 7.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54: 187–226.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, 2005 Kupreeva, I. (ed.), Philoponus, On Aristotle’s “On Coming-to-Be and Perishing 2.5–11.” Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Kurland, 1958 Kurland, S. (ed.), Averroes on Aristotle’s De generatione et Corruptione. on Aristotle’sMiddle Commentary and Epitome. Medieval Academy of America, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Laks–Most, 2016 Laks, A. and Most, G. W., Early Greek Philosophy. Volume 5: Western Greek Thinkers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leunissen, 2014 Leunissen, M., “Commentary on Henry.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 29: 170–181.Google Scholar
Leunissen, 2015 Leunissen, (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lewis, 1996 Lewis, E. (ed.), Alexander of Aphrodisias, On Aristotle “Meteorology 4.” Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Lewis, 2008 Lewis, F. A., “What’s the Matter with Prime Matter?” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 123–146.Google Scholar
Lewis-Bowen, 1996 Lewis, F. A. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle. Blackwell Publishers, Malden.Google Scholar
Lorenz, 2019 Lorenz, H., “Physics I 7: The Principles of Natural Things–Two of Three?” In Ierodiakonou et. al. 2019: 262–285.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, 1936 Lovejoy, A. O., The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Malink–Rosen, 2012 Malink, M. and Rosen, J. “A Method of Modal Proof in Aristotle.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 42: 179–261.Google Scholar
Mansion, 1946 Mansion, S., Le jugement d’existence chez Aristote. Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de philosophie, Louvain.Google Scholar
McCabe, 1994 McCabe, M. M., Plato’s Individuals. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Migliori, 1976 Migliori, M. (ed.), Aristotele, La generazione e la corruzione. Loffredo editore, Napoli.Google Scholar
Mugler, 1966 Aristote, De la génération et la corruption. Texte établi par Mugler, Ch.. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.Google Scholar
Natali, 2004 Natali, C., “On Generation and Corruption I 6.” In de Haas-Mansfeld 2004: 195–217.Google Scholar
O’Connor, 2015 O’Connor, S., “The Subjects of Natural Generations in Aristotle’s Physics I 7.” In Apeiron 48: 45–75.Google Scholar
Owens, 2007 Owens, J., Aristotle’s Gradations of Being in Metaphysics E-H. St. Augustine’s Press, South Bend.Google Scholar
Quarantotto, 2015 Quarantotto, D., “A Dynamic Ontology: On How Aristotle Arrived at the Conclusion that Eternal Change Accomplishes Ousia.” in Leunissen 2015: 162–185.Google Scholar
Quarantotto, 2018 Quarantotto, D. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rashed, 2005 Aristote, De la génération et la corruption. Text établi et traduit par Rashed, M.. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.Google Scholar
Robinson, 1974 Robinson, H. M., “Prime Matter in Aristotle.” In Phronesis 19: 168–188.Google Scholar
Scharle, 2008 Scharle, M., “Elemental Teleology in Aristotle’s Physics II 8.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 147–183.Google Scholar
Scharle, 2009 Scharle, M., “A Synchronic Justification of Aristotle’s Commitment to Prime Matter.” In Phronesis 54: 326–345.Google Scholar
Scharle, 2015 a Scharle, M., “Man from Man but not Bed from Bed: Nature, Art, and Chance in Physics II.” In Leunissen 2015: 88–106.Google Scholar
Scharle, 2015 b Scharle, M., “‘And These Things Follow’: Teleology, Necessity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Meteorologica.” In Ebrey 2015: 79–99.Google Scholar
Sedley, 2007 Sedley, D., Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Sharples, 1979 Sharples, R. W. “‘If what is earlier, then of necessity what is later?’ Some Ancient Discussions of Aristotle, De generatione et corruptione II 11.” In Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 26: 27–44.Google Scholar
Sharples, 1992 Alexander of Aphrodisias, Quaestiones. Vol. 2, 2.16–3.15. Edited by Sharples, R. W.. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Sharvy, 1983 Sharvy, R., “Aristotle on Mixtures.” In Journal of Philosophy 80: 439–457.Google Scholar
Shields, 2012 Shields, Ch., The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Solmsen, 1958 Solmsen, F., “Aristotle and Prime Matter: A Reply to Hugh R. King.” In Journal of the History of Ideas 19: 243–252.Google Scholar
Solmsen, 1960 Solmsen, F., Aristotle’s System of the Physical World. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Taub, 2020 Taub, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thijssen-Braakhuis, 1999 Thijssen, J. M. M. H., and Braakhuis, H. A. G. (eds.), The Commentary Tradition on Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione: Ancient, Medieval, and Early Modern. Brepols, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Tricot, 1951 Tricot, J., Aristote, De la génération et de la corruption. J. Vrin, Paris (2nd edition).Google Scholar
van Rijen, 1989 van Rijen, J., Aspects of Aristotle’s Logic of Modalities. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht and Boston.Google Scholar
Verdenius-Waszink, 1966 Verdenius, W. J. and Waszink, J. H., Aristotle on Coming-to-Be and Passing-Away: Some Comments. Brill, Leiden (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Vitelli, 1897 Philoponus, In Aristotelis Libros de Generatione et Corruptione Commentaria. In Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 14.2, edited by Vitelli, G.. Reimer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wedin, 2013 Wedin, M., “Aristotle on the Impossibility of Anaximander’s apeiron: On Generation and Corruption, 332a20–25.” In Phronesis 58: 17–31.Google Scholar
Wehrli, 1969 Wehrli, F., Eudemus von Rhodos. In Die Schule des Aristoteles: Texte und Kommentar. Heft 8. Schwabe, Basel (2nd revised edition).Google Scholar
Weisberg-Wood, 2004 Weisberg, M. and Wood, R.. “Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems about Elemental Composition from Philoponus to Cooper.” In Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35: 681–706.Google Scholar
Wildberg, 2004 Wildberg, Ch., “On Generation and Corruption I 7: Aristotle on poiein and paschein.” In de Haas-Mansfeld 2004: 219–242.Google Scholar
Williams, 1982 Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione. Translated with Notes by Williams, C. J. F.. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilson, 2014 Wilson, M.. Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meteorologica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar