Metacognition research: an interim report

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489976.012

11 - Metacognition research: an interim report

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Asher Koriat

Edited by

Timothy J. Perfect and

Bennett L. Schwartz

Show author details

Asher Koriat: Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Recent years have witnessed a trend toward the establishment of metacognition as a field of investigation in its own right that pulls together researchers from a variety of areas. These areas include memory research, developmental psychology, judgment and decision-making, neuropsychology, reasoning and problem solving, social psychology, forensic psychology, educational testing, and consciousness. The few edited volumes that have appeared in recent years on metacognition illustrate the tendency of researchers from disparate areas of investigation to bring their research under the common umbrella of metacognition. This volume is also a witness to this tendency, which I expect to intensify in the years to come.

In this overview chapter, I will begin by pointing out the basic assumptions that seem to underlie much of the experimental work on metacognition. I will then outline several lines of research on metacognition, and show how the chapters in this volume actually reflect the converging influence of these different lines of research. In the main part of the chapter I will focus on the basic issues in metacognition, pointing out some of the contributions of the research reported in this book to the emerging unified field of metacognition.

Basic assumptions

Metacognition, narrowly defined, concerns people's cognitions and feelings about their cognitive states and cognitive processes. However, the term metacognition has been also used more broadly to refer to cognitions about cognition in general, as well as self-regulation processes that take cognitive processes as their object (see Schneider and Lockl, this volume).

Type: Chapter
Information: Applied Metacognition , pp. 261 - 286

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489976.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnes, A. E., Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Mazzoni, G., and Narens, L. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In D. Gopher and A. Koriat (eds.), Attention and performance ⅩⅦ – cognitive regulation of performance: interaction of theory and application, pp. 287–313. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., and Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 610–632CrossRef Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 6, 1–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Benjamin, A. S., and Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L. M. Reder (ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition, pp. 309–338. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., and Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher and A. Koriat (eds.), Attention and performance ⅩⅦ – cognitive regulation of performance: interaction of theory and application, pp. 435–459. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bjorklund, D. F., and Douglas, R. N. (1997). The development of memory strategies. In N. Cowan (ed.), The development of memory in childhood, pp. 201–246. Hove, UK: Psychology Press

Bless, H., and Forgas, J. P. (2000). The message within: the role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. Hove, UK: Psychology Press

Brown, R., and McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgess, P. W., and Shallice, T. (1996). Confabulation and the control of recollection. Memory, 4, 359–411CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carroll, M., Nelson, T. O., and Kirwan, A. (1997). Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 95, 239–253CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cary, M., and Reder, L. M. (in press). Metacognition in strategy selection: giving consciousness too much credit. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, and P-J. Marescaux (eds.), Metacognition: process, function, and use. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer

Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y. (eds., 1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Publications

Cohen, R. L., Sandler, S. P., and Keglevich, L. (1991). The failure of memory monitoring in a free recall task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 523–538CrossRef Google Scholar

Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J., and Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12, 50–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Dodson, C. S., and Schacter, D. L. (2002). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 782–803CrossRef Google Scholar

Dufresne, A., and Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children's spontaneous allocation of study time: differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274–296CrossRef Google Scholar

Erev, I., Wallsten, T. S., and Budescu, D. V. (1994). Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: the role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review, 101, 519–527CrossRef Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, pp. 335–351. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: the appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 552–564Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant's comments: what is memory development the development of?Human Development, 14, 272–278CrossRef Google Scholar

Gardiner, J. M., and Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory, pp. 229–244. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., and Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506–528CrossRef Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., and ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press

Glenberg, A. M., and Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory and Cognition 15, 84–93CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., and Weinberg-Eliezer, A. (2002). The strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 73–95CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griffin, D. W., and Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411–435CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruneberg, M. M., Monks, J., and Sykes, R. N. (1977). Some methodological problems with feeling of knowing studies. Acta Pychologica, 41, 365–371CrossRef Google Scholar

Guttentag, R., and Carroll, D. (1998). Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition, 26, 951–958CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208–216CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley

Holland Joyner, M., and Kurtz-Costes, B. (1997). Metamemory development. In N. Cowan (ed.), The development of memory in children, pp. 275–300. Hove, UK: Psychology Press

Jacoby, L., and Kelley, C. M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 314–336CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. E., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Slavin, S., and Weiner, B. (1972), Attribution: perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press

Juslin, P., Winman, A., and Olsson, H. (2000). Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard–easy effect. Psychological Review, 107, 384–396CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Kelley, C. M., and Jacoby, L. (2000). Recollection and familiarity: process dissociation. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory, pp. 215–228. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Kelley, C. M., and Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Keren, G. (1991). Calibration and probability judgments: conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica, 77, 217–273CrossRef Google Scholar

King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. B., and Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: the influence of retrieval practice. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 329–343CrossRef Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311–333CrossRef

Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370CrossRef

Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171CrossRef

Koriat, A., and Bjork, R. A. (submitted). Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study: the foresight bias

Koriat, A., and Goldsmith, M. (1996a). Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: correspondence versus storehouse views of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 167–188CrossRef Google Scholar

Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1996b). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517CrossRef

Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., and Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537CrossRef Google Scholar

Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., Schneider, W., and Nakash-Dura, M. (2001). The credibility of children's testimony: can children control the accuracy of their memory reports?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 405–437CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koriat, A., and Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology, pp. 483–502. New York: Guilford Publications

Koriat, A., and Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and the accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34–53

Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118Google Scholar

Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., and Ma'ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(2), 147–162CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koriat, A., and Shitzer-Reichert, R. (in press). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy: insights from the processes underlying judgments of learning in children. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, and P.-J. Marescaux (eds.), Metacognition: process, function, and use. New York: Kluwer

Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, C., and Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children's knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40 (1, Serial no. 159)CrossRef Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., and Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic., and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, pp. 306–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Lindsay, D. S., and Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 197–211CrossRef Google Scholar

Maki, R. H. (1998). Metacomprehension of text: influence of absolute confidence level on bias and accuracy. In D. L. Medin (ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation, Volume 38, pp. 223–248. San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef

Mazzoni, G., and Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: why is study time sometimes not effective?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Mazzoni, G., and Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1263–1274Google Scholar PubMed

Metcalfe, J. (2000). Feelings and judgement of knowing: is there a special noetic state?Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 178–186CrossRef Google Scholar

Mitchell, K. J., and Johnson, M. K. (2000). Source monitoring: attributing mental experiences. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory, pp. 179–195. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., and Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 282–300CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nelson, T. O., Graf, A., Dunlosky, J., Marlatt, A., Walker, D., and Luce, K. (1998). Effect of acute alcohol intoxication on recall and on judgments of learning during the acquisition of new information. In G. Mazzoni and T. O. Nelson (eds.), Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology: monitoring and control processes, pp. 161–180. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Nelson, T. O., and Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, Volume 26, pp. 125–173. San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef

Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know – and sometimes misjudge – what others know: imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759CrossRef Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–279CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., and Thiede, K. W. (2000). The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1004–1010CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90–138CrossRef Google Scholar

Reder, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 227–259CrossRef Google Scholar

Reder, L. M., and Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435–451Google Scholar

Roediger, H. L., and McDermott, K. B. (2000). Distortions of memory. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory, pp. 149–177. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Volume 10, pp. 174–221. New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Schneider, W., and Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Memory. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, and R. S. Siegler (eds.), Handbook of child psychology: cognition, perception, and language, Volume 2, pp. 467–521. New York: Wiley

Schneider, W., and Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between 2 and 20. New York: Springer-Verlag

Schwartz, B. L. (2001). The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time. Memory and Cognition, 29, 117–126CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwartz, B. L., and Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing, pp. 115–135. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Simon, D. A., and Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 907–912Google Scholar PubMed

Son, L. K., and Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204–221Google Scholar PubMed

Thiede, K. W., and Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist, 40, 85–398CrossRef Google Scholar

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232CrossRef Google Scholar

Weaver, C. A., and Kelemen, W. L. (in press). Comparing processing-based, stimulus-based, and subject-based factors in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, and P.-J. Marescaux (eds.), Metacognition: process, function, and use. New York: Kluwer

Yzerbyt, V. Y., Lories, G., and Dardenne, B. (1998), Metacognition: cognitive and social dimensions. London, UK: Sage Publications