Introduction: toward an applied metacognition

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489976.002

1 - Introduction: toward an applied metacognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Bennett L. Schwartz and

Timothy J. Perfect

Edited by

Timothy J. Perfect and

Bennett L. Schwartz

Show author details

Bennett L. Schwartz: Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Psychology Florida International University, USA
Timothy J. Perfect: Affiliation:
Professor of Experimental Psychology University of Plymouth, UK

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Metacognition is traditionally defined as the experiences and knowledge we have about our own cognitive processes (e.g. Flavell, 1979). Although ripe for philosophers and cognitive psychologists (e.g. Nelson, 1996), this topic may not appear at a first glance to be one immediately applicable to everyday human life. However, we hope to show in this book that metacognition has broad applications across a number of different settings. Furthermore, we contend that, unlike some laboratory research, metacognitive data from the lab have parallels to real-world phenomena and therefore can be applied. The nature of metacognition is such that, in order to study it effectively in the lab, one must devise situations that mimic real life. The current volume will also attest to the ease with which metacognition research moves back and forth from theoretical questions to applied concerns, a situation we consider most desirable in any scientific endeavor.

Let us begin with examples from everyday life in which metacognition is important. Imagine a student studying for an exam. It is well past midnight, she has been studying for hours, and is exhausted. The decision that this student must make is whether she has studied the material for the exam sufficiently and can go to sleep, or whether she must brew another pot of coffee and keep studying. The student must decide whether the material is generally well-learned, and if not, what information necessitates further study.

Type: Chapter
Information: Applied Metacognition , pp. 1 - 12

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489976.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (eds.), Metacognition: knowing about knowing, pp. 185–205. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher and A. Koriat (eds.), Attention and performance ⅩⅦ. Cognitive regulation of performance: interaction of theory and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., and Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691–695CrossRef Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognitive and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruneberg, M. M., and Monks, J. (1974). “Feeling of knowing” and cued recall. Acta Psychologica, 38, 257–265CrossRef Google Scholar

Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser (eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp. 1–24. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., and Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208–216CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 685–691CrossRef

Herrmann, D. J. (1998). The relationship between basic research and applied research in memory and cognition. In C. P. Thompson, D. J. Hermann, D. Bruce, J. D. Read, D. G. Payne, and M. P. Toglia (eds.), Autobiographical memory: theoretical and applied perspectives, pp. 13–27. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181CrossRef Google Scholar

Metcalfe, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: interpretations for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100, 3–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: what are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, and R. L. Sykes (eds.), Practical aspects of memory, pp. 3–24. London: Academic Press

Nelson, T. O. (1988). Predictive accuracy of feeling of knowing across different criterion tasks and across different subject populations and individuals. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, and R. Sykes (eds.), Practical aspects of memory: current research and issues, Volume 1, pp. 190–196. New York: Wiley

Nelson, T. O. (1993). Judgments of learning and the allocation of study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 269–273CrossRef

Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-116CrossRef

Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., and Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207–213CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, T. O., and Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 338–368CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, T. O., (1990). Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Volume 26, pp. 125–141. San Diego, CA: Academic PressCrossRef

Pezdek, K., Finger, K., and Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: the role of event plausibility. Psychological Science, 8, 437–441CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 357–375CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schwartz, B. L., Benjamin, A. S., and Bjork, R. A. (1997). The inferential and experiential basis of metamemory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 132–137CrossRef Google Scholar

Shimamura, A. P., and Squire, L. R. (1986). Memory and metamemory: a study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 452–460Google Scholar PubMed

Son, L. K., and Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204–221Google Scholar PubMed

Thiede, K. W., and Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037Google Scholar

Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1–12CrossRef Google Scholar

Wimmer, H., and Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed