Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- PART I Mr. Kingsley's Method of Disputation
- PART II True Mode of meeting Mr. Kingsley
- PART III History of my Religious Opinions up to 1833
- PART IV History of my Religious Opinions from 1833 to 1839
- PART V History of my Religious Opinions from 1839 to 1841
- PART VI History of my Religious Opinions from 1841 to 1845
- PART VII General Answer to Mr. Kingsley
- APPENDIX: Answer in Detail to Mr. Kingsley's Accusations
- Notes
- POSTSCRIPTUM
PART IV - History of my Religious Opinions from 1833 to 1839
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- PART I Mr. Kingsley's Method of Disputation
- PART II True Mode of meeting Mr. Kingsley
- PART III History of my Religious Opinions up to 1833
- PART IV History of my Religious Opinions from 1833 to 1839
- PART V History of my Religious Opinions from 1839 to 1841
- PART VI History of my Religious Opinions from 1841 to 1845
- PART VII General Answer to Mr. Kingsley
- APPENDIX: Answer in Detail to Mr. Kingsley's Accusations
- Notes
- POSTSCRIPTUM
Summary
In spite of the foregoing pages, I have no romantic story to tell; but I wrote them, because it is my duty to tell things as they took place. I have not exaggerated the feelings with which I returned to England, and I have no desire to dress up the events which followed, so as to make them in keeping with the narrative which has gone before. I soon relapsed into the every-day life which I had hitherto led; in all things the same, except that a new object was given me. I had employed myself in my own rooms in reading and writing, and in the care of a Church, before I left England, and I returned to the same occupations when I was back again. And yet perhaps those first vehement feelings which carried me on were necessary for the beginning of the Movement; and afterwards, when it was once begun, the special need of me was over.
When I got home from abroad, I found that already a movement had commenced in opposition to the specific danger which at that time was threatening the religion of the nation and its Church. Several zealous and able men had united their counsels, and were in correspondence with each other. The principal of these were Mr. Keble, Hurrell Froude, who had reached home long before me, Mr. William Palmer of Dublin and Worcester College (not Mr. W. Palmer of Magdalen, who is now a Catholic), Mr. Arthur Perceval, and Mr. Hugh Rose.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Apologia Pro Vita SuaBeing a Reply to a Pamphlet Entitled ‘What, Then, Does Dr Newman Mean?’, pp. 101 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010First published in: 1864