Book contents
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Anti-Constitutional Populism
- I Populisms
- II Courts
- III Anti-Constitutionalism After Post-Communism
- IV Eu Responses
- Chapter 11 Populism and the Crisis of Constitutional Pluralism
- Chapter 12 Populist Constitutional Grammar - Between Manipulative Borrowing and Bad (Judicial) Masters
- Chapter 13 Constitutional Populism versus EU Law: A Much More Complex Story than You Imagined
- V Concluding Reflections
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Chapter 12 - Populist Constitutional Grammar - Between Manipulative Borrowing and Bad (Judicial) Masters
from IV - Eu Responses
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2022
Book contents
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Anti-Constitutional Populism
- I Populisms
- II Courts
- III Anti-Constitutionalism After Post-Communism
- IV Eu Responses
- Chapter 11 Populism and the Crisis of Constitutional Pluralism
- Chapter 12 Populist Constitutional Grammar - Between Manipulative Borrowing and Bad (Judicial) Masters
- Chapter 13 Constitutional Populism versus EU Law: A Much More Complex Story than You Imagined
- V Concluding Reflections
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
A well-regarded scholar has correctly pointed out that ‘populism has a problematic relationship with constitutionalism’.1 It would be too ambitious to investigate the several ways in which such a problematic relationship has been framed,2 and, especially, the different perspectives which have been undertaken in order to investigate it.3 The aims of this chapter are much narrower.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anti-Constitutional Populism , pp. 434 - 461Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Albi, A, ‘Postmodern versus Retrospective Sovereignty: Two Different Discourses in the EU and the Candidate Countries’ in Walker, Neil (ed) Sovereignty in Transition (Hart 2003)Google Scholar
Albi, A, EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe (Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Avbelj, M, ‘The Right Question about the FCC Ultra Vires Decision’ Verfassungsblog (6 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/the-right-question-about-the-fcc-ultra-vires-decision/Google Scholar
Baer, S, ‘The Rule of – and Not by Any – Law: On Constitutionalism’ (2018) 71(1) Current Legal Problems 335Google Scholar
Blokker, P, ‘Populism as Constitutional Project’ (2019) 17(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 535Google Scholar
Blokker, P, Bugarič, B, and Halmai, G, ‘Introduction: Populist Constitutionalism: Varieties, Complexities, and Contradictions’ (2019) 20(3) German Law Journal 291Google Scholar
Canovan, M, ‘Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy’ in Meny, Y and Surel, Y (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M and Golay, D, ‘Judicial Branch in the Federal and Transnational Union’ in Cappelletti, M, Seccombe, M and Weiler, J H H (eds) Integration Trough Law (Ashgate, 1986)Google Scholar
Corrales, J, ‘The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela’ (2015) 26(2) Journal of Democracy 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrias, L, ‘Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity’ (2016) 12(1) European Constitutional Law Review 6Google Scholar
Czarnota, A, ‘The Constitutional Tribunal’ Verfassubsblog (3 June 2017) verfassungsblog.de/the-constitutional-tribunalGoogle Scholar
Dani, Marco, Mendes, Joana, Menendez, Agustín José, and Wilkinson, Michael ‘At the End of the Law: A Moment of Truth for the Eurozone and the EU’ Verfassungsblog (15 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/at-the-end-of-the-law/Google Scholar
Dixon, R, ‘Introduction – Public Law and Populism’ (2019) 20(2) German Law Journal 125Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F, and Pollicino, O, ‘Constitutional Identity in Italy: Institutional Disagreements at a Time of Political Change’ in Callies, C and Schyff, G van der (eds) Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Faraguna, P, ‘Il Bundesverfassungsgericht e l’Unione Europea, tra principio di apertura e controlimiti’ [Il Bundesverfassungsgericht and European Union, between the principle of openness and counterlimits] (2016) Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 431Google Scholar
Fournier, T, ‘From Rhetoric to Action: A Constitutional Analysis of Populism’ (EUI Working Paper 08/2018, European University Institute) cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/51725Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T, and Huq, A A, How to Save a Constitutional Democracy (Chicago University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Halmai, G, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity: The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43(1) Review of Central and East European Law 222Google Scholar
Halmai, G, and Scheppele, K L, ‘Orbán is Still the Sole Judge of his Own Law’ Verfassungsblog (30 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/orban-is-still-the-sole-judge-of-his-own-law/Google Scholar
Huq, A, and Ginsburg, T, ‘How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy’ (2018) 65 UCLA Law Review 78Google Scholar
Kallis, A, ‘Populism, Sovereigntism, and the Unlikely Re-Emergence of the Territorial Nation-State’ (2018) 11(3) Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 285Google Scholar
Kovács, K, ‘Hungary’s Orbánistan: A Complete Arsenal of Emergency Powers’ Verfassungsblog (6 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/hungarys-orbanistan-a-complete-arsenal-of-emergency-powers/Google Scholar
Krunke, H, and Klinge, S, ‘The Danish Ajos Case: The Missing Case from Maastricht to Lisbon’ (2018) 3(1) European Papers 157Google Scholar
Krygier, M, ‘The Challenge of Institutionalisation: Post-Communist “Transitions”, Populism, and the Rule of Law’ (2019) 15(3) European Constitutional Law Review 544Google Scholar
Krygier, M, ‘The Rule of Law: Legality, Teleology, Sociology’ in Palombella, G and Walker, N (eds) Re-locating the Rule of Law (Hart 2008)Google Scholar
Krygier, M, ‘The Rule of Law: Pasts, Presents, and Two Possible Futures’ (2016) 12 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 199Google Scholar
Lakoff, G, and Johnson, M, Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind & Its Challenge to Western Thought (Basic Books, 1999)Google Scholar
Lustig, D, and Weiler, J H H, ‘Judicial Review in the Contemporary World — Retrospective and Prospective’ (2018) 16(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 315Google Scholar
Madsen, M R, Olsen, H P, and Šadl, U, ‘Legal Disintegration? The Ruling of the Danish Supreme Court in AJOS’ Verfassungsblog (30 January 2017) verfassungsblog.de/legal-disintegration-the-ruling-of-the-danish-supreme-court-in-ajos/Google Scholar
Mancini, G F, ‘Attivismo e autocontrollo nella giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia’ [Activism and self-control in the case law of the European Court of Justice] (1990) 30 Rivista Diritto Europeo 233Google Scholar
Martinico, G, and Baraggia, A, ‘Who Is the Master of the Treaties? The Compact Theory in Karlsruhe’ Diritti Comparati (15 May 2020) diritticomparati.it/who-is-the-master-of-the-treaties-the-compact-theory-in-karlsruhe/Google Scholar
Martinico, G, and Pollicino, O, The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Edward Elgar, 2012)Google Scholar
Martinico, G, ‘Between Mimesis and Parasitism: Italian Populism in a Comparative Perspective’ (2020) 26(4) European Public Law 921Google Scholar
Marzal, T, ‘Is the BVerfG PSPP Decision “Simply Not Comprehensible”? A Critique of the Judgment’s Reasoning on Proportionality’ Verfassungsblog (9 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/is-the-bverfg-pspp-decision-simply-not-comprehensible/Google Scholar
Morelli, Alessandro, and Pollicino, Oreste, ‘Metaphors, Judicial Frames and Fundamental Rights in Cyberspace’ (2020) 68(3) American Journal of Comparative Law 616Google Scholar
Mudde, C, ‘Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism?’ (Policy Brief, Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2013) fljs.org/sites/www.fljs.org/files/publications/Mudde_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Müller, J W, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Palombella, G, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Core’ in Palombella, G and Walker, N (eds) Re-locating the Rule of Law (Hart, 2008)Google Scholar
Pitruzzella, G, Pollicino, O, and Bassini, M (eds) Corti europee e democrazia: Rule of law, indipendenza e accountability [European Courts and Democracy: Rule of law, independence and accountability] (Egea, 2019)Google Scholar
Poiares, Maduro M, ‘Some Preliminary Remarks on the PSPP Decision of the German Constitutional Court’ Verfassungsblog (6 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/some-preliminary-remarks-on-the-pspp-decision-of-the-german-constitutional-courtGoogle Scholar
Pollicino, O, ‘Metaphors and Identity Based Narrative in Constitutional Adjudication: When Judicial Dominance Matters’ IACL-AIDC Blog (27 February 2019) blog-iacl-aidc.org/2019-posts/2019/2/27/metaphors-and-identity-based-narrative-in-constitutional-adjudication-when-judicial-dominance-mattersGoogle Scholar
Pollicino, O, and Repetto, G, ‘Not to be Pushed Aside: the Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice’ Verfassungsblog (27 February 2019) verfassungsblog.de/not-to-be-pushed-aside-the-italian-constitutional-court-and-the-european-court-of-justice/Google Scholar
Sadurski, W, ‘Constitutionalization of the EU and the Sovereignty Concerns of the new Accession States: The Role of the Charter of Rights’ (EUI Working Paper Law, No. 2003/11, European University Institute, 2003) cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/1363/law03–11.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W, ‘Accession’s Democracy Dividend: the Impact of the EU Enlargement upon Democracy in the New Member States of Central and Eastern Europe’ (2004) 10(4) European Law Journal 371Google Scholar
Sadurski, W, ‘How Democracy Dies (in Poland): A Case Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding in Poland’ (Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 18/01, University of Sydney, January 2018) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3103491#Google Scholar
Sadurski, W, Czarnota, A, and Krygier, M (eds) Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law?: The Impact of EU Enlargement for the Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Legal Orders (Springer, 2006)Google Scholar
Scheppele, K L, ‘Orbán’s Emergency’ Verfassungsblog (29 March 2020) verfassungsblog.de/orbans-emergency/Google Scholar
Sólyom, L, ‘Constitutional Justice, Some Comparative Remarks’ (Paper presented at Conference on ‘Constitutional Justice and the Rule of Law’ on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the Constitutional Court of Lithuania, Vilnius, 4–5 September 2003) venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-JU(2003)030-eGoogle Scholar
Sólyom, L, ‘The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy’ (2003) 18(1) International Sociology 133Google Scholar
Walker, N, ‘Populism and Constitutional Tension’ (2019)17(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 515Google Scholar
Weiler, J H H, ‘Federalism and Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg’ in Nicolaidis, Kalypso and Howse, Robert (eds) The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Winter, S L, A Clearing in the Forest Law, Life and Mind (University of Chicago Press, 2001)Google Scholar